User Talk: ReyHahn
Server-side rendered snapshot of this editor's Wikipedia talk page discussions.
{{User:MiszaBot/config
| algo = old(30d)
| archive = User talk:ReyHahn/Archive %(counter)d
| counter = 2
| maxarchivesize = 150K
| archiveheader = {{Automatic archive navigator}}
| minthreadstoarchive = 1
| minthreadsleft = 4
}}
{{Talk header|disclaimer=yes}}
<br/>
{{edit notice
| id = loremipsumedn
| header = Attention editors
| headerstyle = font-size: 200%;
| text = '''Please do not leave a message here''' if it is only related to a particular edit I made or about some topic concerning a specific Wikipedia article. Please {{t|ping}} me or '''write to me in the talk page of the article you want to discuss'''.
| textstyle = font-size: 120%;
}}
<!--
HEY HEY HEY HEY HEY HEY HEY HEY HEY HEY HEY HEY HEY HEY HEY HEY HEY HEY HEY HEY HEY HEY HEY HEY HEY HEY HEY HEY HEY HEY HEY HEY HEY HEY HEY HEY
IF YOU ARE GOING TO ADD A NEW MESSAGE
PLEASE
PLEASE
PLEASE
CONSIDER FIRST THE MESSAGE IN THE MESSAGE BOX ABOVE
THANKS
HEY HEY HEY HEY HEY HEY HEY HEY HEY HEY HEY HEY HEY HEY HEY HEY HEY HEY HEY HEY HEY HEY HEY HEY HEY HEY HEY HEY HEY HEY HEY HEY HEY HEY HEY HEY HEY HEY HEY
-->
<br>
New Page Patrol newsletter October 2022
Hello {{BASEPAGENAME}},
thumb|right|120px ↗
Much has happened since the last newsletter over two months ago. The open letter ↗ finished with 444 signatures. The letter was sent to several dozen people at the WMF, and we have heard that it is being discussed but there has been no official reply. A related article appears in the current issue of ''The Signpost'' ↗. If you haven't seen it, you should, including the readers' comment section.
'''Awards''': Barnstars were given for the past several years (thanks to {{Noping|MPGuy2824}}), and we are now all caught up. The 2021 cup went to {{no ping|John B123}} for leading with 26,525 article reviews during 2021. To encourage moderate activity, a new "Iron" level barnstar is awarded annually for reviewing 360 articles ("one-a-day"), and 100 reviews earns the "Standard" NPP barnstar. About 90 reviewers received barnstars for each of the years 2018 to 2021 (including the new awards that were given retroactively). All awards issued for every year are listed on the Awards page ↗. Check out the new Hall of Fame ↗ also.
'''Software news''': {{Noping|Novem Linguae}} and {{Noping|MPGuy2824}} have connected with WMF developers who can review and approve patches, so they have been able to fix some bugs, and make other improvements to the Page Curation software. You can see everything that has been fixed recently here ↗. The reviewer report ↗ has also been improved.
thumb|450px|right|NPP backlog May – October 15, 2022 ↗
'''Suggestions''':
- There is much enthusiasm over the low backlog, but remember that the "quality and depth of patrolling are more important than speed".
- Reminder: ''an article should not be tagged for any kind of deletion for a minimum of 15 minutes after creation and it is often appropriate to wait an hour or more.'' (from the NPP tutorial ↗)
- Reviewers should focus their effort where it can do the most good, reviewing articles. Other clean-up tasks that don't require advanced permissions can be left to other editors that routinely improve articles in these ways (creating Talk Pages, specifying projects and ratings, adding categories, etc.) Let's rely on others when it makes the most sense. On the other hand, if you enjoy doing these tasks while reviewing and it keeps you engaged with NPP (or are guiding a newcomer), then by all means continue.
- This user script puts a link to the feed in your top toolbar.
'''Backlog''':80px|left ↗ Saving the best for last: From a July low of 8,500, the backlog climbed back to 11,000 in August and then reversed in September dropping to below 6,000 and continued falling with the October backlog drive ↗ to under 1,000, a level not seen in over four years. Keep in mind that there are 2,000 new articles every week, so the number of reviews is far higher than the backlog reduction. To keep the backlog under a thousand, we have to keep reviewing at about half the recent rate!
{{-}}
{{refbegin}}
;Reminders
- Newsletter feedback - please take this short poll ↗ about the newsletter.
- If you're interested in instant messaging and chat rooms, please join us on the New Page Patrol Discord ↗, where you can ask for help and live chat with other patrollers.
- Please add the project discussion page ↗ to your watchlist.
- If you are no longer very active on Wikipedia or you no longer wish to be a reviewer, please ask any admin to remove you from the group. If you want the tools back again, just ask at PERM ↗.
- To opt out of future mailings, please remove yourself here ↗.
<!-- Drafted by User:MB -->
<!-- Message sent by User:MB@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:New_pages_patrol/Reviewers/Newsletter_list&oldid=1114894896 -->
New Pages Patrol newsletter January 2023
<div style="border:2px solid #90C0FF; background:#F0F0FF; width:99%; padding:4px">
{| style="float: right; border: 1px solid #BBB; background: #FFFFFF;
|}
Hello {{BASEPAGENAME}},
{| style="float: right;
|- style="font-size: 86%;"
|}
thumb|400px|New Page Review queue December 2022 ↗
;Backlog
The October drive reduced the backlog from 9,700 to an amazing 0! Congratulations to {{noping|WaddlesJP13}} who led with 2084 points. See this page ↗ for further details. The queue is steadily rising again and is approaching 2,000. It would be great if <2,000 were the “new normal”. Please continue to help out even if it's only for a few or even one patrol a day.
;2022 Awards
74px|left ↗
{{no ping|Onel5969}} won the 2022 cup for 28,302 article reviews last year - that's an average of nearly 80/day. There was one Gold Award (5000+ reviews), 11 Silver (2000+), 28 Iron (360+) and 39 more for the 100+ barnstar. {{no ping|Rosguill}} led again for the 4th year by clearing 49,294 redirects. For the full details see the Awards page ↗ and the Hall of Fame ↗. Congratulations everyone!
'''Minimum deletion time''': The previous WP:NPP ↗ guideline was to wait 15 minutes before tagging for deletion (including draftification and WP:BLAR ↗). Due to complaints, a consensus decided to raise the time to 1 hour. To illustrate this, very new pages in the feed ↗ are now highlighted in red. (As always, this is not applicable to attack pages, copyvios, vandalism, etc.)
'''New draftify script''': In response to feedback from AFC, the The Move to Draft script now provides a choice of set messages that also link the creator to a new, friendly explanation page ↗. The script also warns reviewers if the creator is probably still developing the article. The former script is no longer maintained. Please edit your edit your common.js ↗ or vector.js file from <code>User:Evad37/MoveToDraft.js</code> to <code>User:MPGuy2824/MoveToDraft.js</code>
'''Redirects''': Some of our redirect reviewers have reduced their activity and the backlog is up to 9,000+ (two months deep). If you are interested in this distinctly different task and need any help, see this guide ↗, this checklist ↗, and spend some time at WP:RFD ↗.
'''Discussions with the WMF''' The PageTriage open letter ↗ signed by 444 users is bearing fruit. The Growth Team has assigned some software engineers to work on PageTriage, the software that powers the NewPagesFeed and the Page Curation toolbar. WMF has submitted dozens of patches ↗ in the last few weeks to modernize PageTriage's code, which will make it easier to write patches in the future. This work is helpful but is not very visible to the end user. For patches visible to the end user, volunteers such as {{noping|Novem Linguae}} and {{noping|MPGuy2824}} have been writing patches for bug reports and feature requests. The Growth Team also had a video conference ↗ with the NPP coordinators to discuss revamping the landing pages that new users see.
{{refbegin}}
;Reminders
- Newsletter feedback - please take this short poll ↗ about the newsletter.
- There is live chat with patrollers on the New Page Patrol Discord ↗.
- Please add the project discussion page ↗ to your watchlist.
- If you no longer wish to be a reviewer, please ask any admin to remove you from the group. If you want the tools back again, just ask at PERM ↗.
- To opt out of future mailings, please remove yourself here ↗.
</div>
<!-- Drafted by User:MB, Reviewed by Novem Linguae, Kudpung -->
<!-- Message sent by User:MB@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:New_pages_patrol/Reviewers/Newsletter_list&oldid=Reviewers/Newsletter_list&oldid=1130464022 -->
New Pages Patrol newsletter June 2023
<div style="border:2px solid #90C0FF; background:#F0F0FF; width:99%; padding:4px">
<!-- do not use ;Header to make bold headers per H:DL ↗, causes errors for screen readers -->
{| style="float: right; border: 1px solid #BBB; background: #FFFFFF;
|}
Hello {{BASEPAGENAME}},
{| style="float: right;
|- style="font-size: 86%;"
|}
thumb|400px|New Page Review queue April to June 2023 ↗
'''Backlog'''
'''Redirect drive''': In response to an unusually high redirect backlog, we held a redirect backlog drive in May. The drive completed with '''23851''' reviews done in total, bringing the redirect backlog to '''0''' (momentarily). Congratulations to {{Noping|Hey man im josh}} who led with a staggering 4316 points, followed by {{noping|Meena}} and {{noping|Greyzxq}} with 2868 and 2546 points respectively. See this page ↗ for more details. The redirect queue is steadily rising again and is steadily approaching 4,000. Please continue to help out, even if it's only for a few or even one review a day.
'''Redirect autopatrol''': All administrators without autopatrol have now been added to the redirect autopatrol list. If you see any users who consistently create significant amounts of good quality redirects, consider requesting redirect autopatrol for them here ↗.
'''WMF work on PageTriage''': The WMF Moderator Tools team ↗, consisting of {{noping|Samwalton9 (WMF)|label1=Sam|JSherman (WMF)|label2=Jason|SCardenas (WMF)|label3=Susana}}, and also some patches from {{noping|Jon (WMF)|label1=Jon}}, has been hard at work updating PageTriage ↗. They are focusing their efforts on modernising the extension's code rather than on bug fixes or new features, though some user-facing work will be prioritised. This will help make sure that this extension is not deprecated, and is easier to work on in the future. In the next month or so, we will have an opt-in beta test ↗ where new page patrollers can help test the rewrite of Special:NewPagesFeed ↗, to help find bugs. We will post more details at WT:NPPR ↗ when we are ready for beta testers.
'''Articles for Creation (AFC)''': All new page reviewers are now '''automatically approved''' for Articles for Creation draft reviewing (you do not need to apply at WT:AFCP ↗ like was required previously). To install the AFC helper script ↗, visit Special:Preferences ↗, visit the Gadgets tab, tick "Yet Another AFC Helper Script", then click "Save". To find drafts to review, visit Special:NewPagesFeed ↗, and at the top left, tick "Articles for Creation". To review a draft, visit a submitted draft, click on the "More" menu, then click "Review (AFCH)". You can also comment on and submit drafts that are unsubmitted using the script.
You can review the AFC workflow at WP:AFCR ↗. It is up to you if you also want to mark your AFC accepts as NPP reviewed (this is allowed but optional, depends if you would like a second set of eyes on your accept). Don't forget that draftspace is optional ↗, so moves of drafts to mainspace (even if they are not ready) should not be reverted, except possibly if there is conflict of interest.
'''Pro tip''': Did you know that visual artists such as painters have their own SNG ↗? The most common part of this "creative professionals" criteria that applies to artists is WP:ARTIST ↗ 4b (solo exhibition, not group exhibition, at a major museum) or 4d (being represented within the permanent collections of two museums).
{{refbegin}}
'''Reminders'''
- Newsletter feedback - please take this short poll ↗ about the newsletter.
- There is live chat with patrollers on the New Page Patrol Discord ↗ and {{IRC|wikimedia-npp}} on IRC.
- Please add the project discussion page ↗ to your watchlist.
- To opt out of future mailings, please remove yourself here ↗.
</div>
<!-- Drafted by Novem Linguae, MPGuy2824 and Zippybonzo. Sent by Zippybonzo. -->
<!-- Message sent by User:Zippybonzo@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:New_pages_patrol/Reviewers/Newsletter_list&oldid=1160196052 -->
Revert please
I checked your theory and found "She shared the 1903 Nobel Prize in Physics with her husband, Pierre Curie, "for their joint researches on the radioactivity phenomena discovered by Professor Henri Becquerel". She won the 1911 Nobel Prize in Chemistry". Victuallers (talk) 21:41, 16 June 2026 (UTC)
Feedback request: Maths, science, and technology request for comment
48px|left|alt=|link= ↗Your feedback is requested  at '''Talk:Repressed memory'''  on a "Maths, science, and technology" request for comment ↗. Thank you for helping out!<br/><small>You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service ↗ subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name ↗.</small> <!-- Template:FRS notification --><div class="paragraphbreak" style="margin-top:0.5em"></div> <small>(replacing <span class="plainlinks">Yapperbot ↗</span>)</small> SodiumBot (botop|talk ↗|contribs ↗) 03:30, 28 June 2026 (UTC)
Edits on Eiffel Women articles
Happy to be addressing you on your talk page for the first time, ReyHahn, and beh-ta-reen-ha ro ba-rat a-re-zoo da-ram! As a former developer of "automatic translation" (usually called machine translation in English), I was interested to read your comments on your user page. I see that despite various discussions, you have now removed references to Eiffel Tower naming from several other articles related to the 72 Eiffel Women. May I simply request that before you make any further edits along these lines, you wait for some kind of consensus to be established. In all my years with Wikipedia, I have never entered into edit wars by reverting changes made by other editors. Instead, I have found discussions on talk pages to be a far more constructive way forward. If we can agree to a "crease-fire" along these lines, I may be able to continue my work on improving the biographies related to the Eiffel Women. If not, I hope there will be others who are willing to take up the challenge. Happy editing! And please forgive me for copying this to {{u|Victuallers}}, {{u|Rosiestep}} and {{u|MumphingSquirrel}}.--Ipigott (talk) 14:30, 7 July 2026 (UTC)
:Thanks for the message. Yes, I will stop removing lines about the Eiffel Tower addition while the discussion is on. Just to be clear I was not edit warring or anything I discussed this before with other users and in others there was no even other edits so I thought it was ok. Again I am trying to improve the articles too and I will continue. Please let me know if there any specific strategy on other points ReyHahn (talk) 14:39, 7 July 2026 (UTC)
:Also please next time do not bring more people to my talk page without justification. Also please consider specifying why you bring certain people to discussions. To avoid WP:CANVAS ↗ accusations. -ReyHahn (talk) 14:42, 7 July 2026 (UTC)
::Thanks a million for your cooperation. I will try not to upset you further on your talk page or ping other collaborators but I really considered this to be a serious matter in connection with my own interests. Tomorrow I'll try to get back to improving Eiffel Women articles. You may be interested to know that through my family I have has close relations with Farsi and that this also extended to my development of machine translation from the 1970s when the Americans, especially the US Air Force, were particularly concerned about developments in Iran and the middle east. Thanks to AI, today machine translation is becoming a real asset, even for languages like Farsi. Please let me know if I can help you along with anything.--Ipigott (talk) 20:11, 7 July 2026 (UTC)
::: As I said I will stop editing the specific line in discussion while we settle this up. I will try to help on the rest. I would like to let you know that I am not all (not even an inch) related to Iran, some users suggested that because my username sounds like "basil" in Farsi. Nevertheless, I am also happy to help with related articles. I have my issues with machine translation but that is not important for now. Thanks for reaching out and remaining very polite.--ReyHahn (talk) 07:32, 8 July 2026 (UTC)
:::: Super polite. Please stop anything that looks like stalking. If you are not doing anything that looks like stalking then that's great. Victuallers (talk) 15:23, 8 July 2026 (UTC)
:::::You have been more on the defense. Please consider discussing editorial and consensus rules that you have in a public page. My manner of editing in Wikipedia is to edit here and there when I see something I can help with. It is not helpful to call this stalking. I have been working in some of the Eiffel women articles even before the announcement. Please if you have any important issue to discuss let us discuss it in the appropriate page.--ReyHahn (talk) 15:27, 8 July 2026 (UTC)
:::::Also I read the Event:EiffelWomen ↗ and joined. Hope it is allowed.--ReyHahn (talk) 15:29, 8 July 2026 (UTC)