User Talk: Salgo60

Server-side rendered snapshot of this editor's Wikipedia talk page discussions.

{{User:MiszaBot/config
| algo = old(7d)
| archive = User talk:Salgo60/Archive
}}

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

<div class="ivmbox " style="margin-bottom: 1em; border: 1px solid #AAA; background-color: ivory; padding: 0.5em; display: flex; align-items: center; ">
<div class="ivmbox-image" style="padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em; flex: 1 0 40px; max-width: 100px">40px ↗</div>
<div class="ivmbox-text">
Hello! Voting in the '''2023 Arbitration Committee elections ↗''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2023|end}}-1 day}}. All '''eligible users ↗''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee ↗ is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process ↗. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans ↗, topic bans ↗, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy ↗ describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates ↗ and submit your choices on the '''2023|poll}}|voting page ↗'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. <small>MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:25, 28 November 2023 (UTC)</small>

</div>
</div>

Your revert

What do you mean by "Wikivoyage Its [sic]not good enough" in Special:Diff/1295698298 ↗. Not only is that an invalid reason for removing the link, I cannot help but notice you rapidly removing links to Wikivoyage on multiple wikis after you were indeffed. Care to explain yourself? --SHB2000 (talk) 09:15, 15 June 2025 (UTC)

:see Talk%3AStockholm_Archipelago_Trail#Wikivoyage_link_removed ↗ Salgo60 (talk) 09:48, 15 June 2025 (UTC)

ArbCom 2025 Elections voter message

<div class="ivmbox " style="margin-bottom: 1em; border: 1px solid #a2a9b1; background-color: #fdf2d5; padding: 0.5em; display: flex; align-items: center; ">
<div class="ivmbox-image" style="padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em;flex-basis: 40px">40px ↗</div>
<div class="ivmbox-text">
Hello! Voting in the '''2025 Arbitration Committee elections ↗''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2025|end}}-1 day}}. All '''eligible users ↗''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee ↗ is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process ↗. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans ↗, topic bans ↗, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy ↗ describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please review the candidates ↗ and submit your choices on the '''2025|poll}}|voting page ↗'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. <small>MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:22, 18 November 2025 (UTC)</small>

</div>
</div>

May 2026

25px|alt=Information icon ↗ Hello, I'm Belbury. An edit that you recently made to :Forward Deployed Engineer ↗ seemed to be generated using a large language model ↗ (an "AI chatbot ↗" or other application using such technology). Text produced by these applications is not allowed on Wikipedia ↗, and may contain factually inaccurate statements, fictitious citations, or other problems. You should instead read reliable sources ↗ and then summarize those in your own words. Your edit may have been reverted ↗. If you want to practice editing, please use your sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page, or ask your questions at the Teahouse ↗, a friendly place for new users. ''I have removed the Venn diagram where the text content was written by a chatbot.''{{PAGENAME}} ↗ Belbury (talk) 15:45, 5 May 2026 (UTC)

:I dont understand the logic I wrote the prompt for the picture ""A simple black-and-white Venn diagram with three overlapping circles on a white background. The circles are labeled "Software engineer", "Platform engineer", and "Solutions architect". In the center intersection, place the text "Forward Deployed Engineer". Use thin black lines, no colors or only very light grayscale. Use a clean sans-serif font. The design should be minimalistic, neutral, and encyclopedic, similar to diagrams found on Wikipedia or in textbooks. No decorations, no icons, no shading, no 3D effects." see File:Forward_Deployed_Engineer.png ↗ Salgo60 (talk) 16:09, 5 May 2026 (UTC)

The Deployment Company ↗ moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to The Deployment Company ↗. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing as a live article at this time because '''Likely fails WP:NCORP ↗ but sending to draft as an ATD so it can be sourced according to WP:ORGCRIT ↗. '''.
I have converted it to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page ↗.
When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. CNMall41 (talk) 06:29, 20 May 2026 (UTC)

:OK — time will tell what becomes notable. You may have another candidate in Forward Deployed Engineer ↗ - pageviews ↗
:* page views The Deployment Company ↗
: -Salgo60 (talk) 06:43, 20 May 2026 (UTC)

ChatGPT about the subject: Wikipedia, AI, and the Future of Notability

''I asked ChatGPT about this subject:'''

I think within a year we’ll see several quite significant changes in how “notability” is perceived and how knowledge systems operate.

Traditional signals like newspaper articles and books will no longer be enough on their own. Many new concepts first gain traction through GitHub, YouTube, podcasts, Hacker News, Reddit, X, and AI assistants.

Roles such as “Forward Deployed Engineer ↗,” “AI Safety Engineer,” and similar titles will become established faster than Wikipedia’s processes can adapt to.

At the same time, I think Wikipedia may start discussing more seriously how to evaluate digital impact, usage patterns, community signals, and perhaps even machine-readable knowledge.

Ironically, '''I also think Wikipedia will become even more important''' as a human-curated and quality-assured source when AI-generated content floods the internet.

We’ll probably also see growing tension between:

the rapid pace of change in the tech world

slower institutional quality processes

requirements for verifiability

and people’s sense of what is already culturally relevant

What’s fascinating is that Wikipedia is already in the middle of this transition. Many AI-related concepts receive enormous attention long before there is stable secondary coverage according to traditional criteria.

So I think the question will gradually shift from:

> '''“Is this notable?”'''

to something more like:

> '''“How do we recognize early signals of what is becoming important?”'''

In many ways, this connects closely to broader discussions around open knowledge systems, linked data, provenance, and how new phenomena become understandable before institutions have fully caught up.

- Salgo60 (talk) 07:36, 20 May 2026 (UTC)