User Talk: Santasa99

Server-side rendered snapshot of this editor's Wikipedia talk page discussions.

'''Wikipedia:Template_index''': Cleanup (#Neutrality_and_factual_accuracy, etc) ↗

'''Meta Category:Editor handbook''' ↗

{{Purge button|right}}
{{User:MiszaBot/config
| algo = old(15d)
| archive = User talk:Santasa99/Archive %(counter)d
| counter = 10
| maxarchivesize = 200K
| archiveheader = {{Automatic archive navigator}}
| minthreadstoarchive = 2
| minthreadsleft = 1
}}
{{archives}}

{{centralized discussion|width=200px}}

{{shortcut|WP:DBOARD}}
{{shortcut|WP:PGLIST}}
{{Linking and page manipulation|linking and diffs}}
{{Administrators' noticeboard navbox}}
{{Wikipedia policies and guidelines|state=collapsed}}
{{Wikipedia essays|state=expanded|state1=collapsed|state2=collapsed|state3=collapsed|state4=collapsed|state5=collapsed}}

Few tips & tricks

When page number does not make sense use <nowiki>{{sfn|Fine|2009b|loc=§ Poglavlje II}}</nowiki> !

In that case, the page number does not make sense. If you want to make it explicit where the revelant text is located in longer online sources, you can use the parameter "loc" instead of "p" to indicate the section. For example, you could use "<nowiki>{{sfn|Fine|2009b|loc=§ Poglavlje II}}</nowiki>".

Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution

{{User:ClueBot III/DoNotArchiveUntil|1934652718}}
25px|alt=Information icon ↗ Thank you for your contributions ↗ to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from :Bosnian genocide denial ↗ into :Milorad Dodik ↗. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing ↗ does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary ↗ at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking ↗ to the copied page, e.g., <code>copied content from <nowiki>page name ↗</nowiki>; see that page's history for attribution</code>. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{tl|copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia ↗. Thank you.  If you are the sole author of the prose that was copied, attribution is not required. ''( Note from user Diannaa (talk) 14:59, 17 March 2021 (UTC); original post archived.)
''

Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution

25px|alt=Information icon ↗ Thank you for your contributions ↗ to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from :Bosnian genocide denial ↗ into :Milorad Dodik ↗. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing ↗ does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary ↗ at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking ↗ to the copied page, e.g., <code>copied content from <nowiki>page name ↗</nowiki>; see that page's history for attribution</code>. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{tl|copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia ↗. Thank you.  If you are the sole author of the prose that was copied, attribution is not required. — Diannaa (talk) 14:59, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
: Thanks Diannaa, I was sort of aware of this but didn't know that it's required to do something in that regard. So, basically, this <code>copied content from <nowiki>page name ↗</nowiki>; see that page's history for attribution</code> would suffice and can be used as a template in edit-summary (if copied text is short or not substantial) and in TP (if there is a lot of copied text). I think that in this case - Bosnian genocide denial > Milorad Dodik - I am a sole contributor of copied text, and it is not particularly intricate narrative it's more of a listing, but if I understood correctly, in case of being sole contributor then, maybe, it could be unnecessary. Please, just to be on the safe side, let me know if I understood this correctly? Thanks again, and stay safe.--'''౪ Santa ౪''''''''99°''''' 15:44, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
::Hi Santasa99. The edit summary is mandatory whether you place a template on the talk page or not. The talk page template is optional. You are correct that if you are the sole author, attribution is not required, but it's still helpful for patrolling admins if you do so. — Diannaa (talk) 15:48, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
:::Yes, of course, I know that edit summary is mandatory on its own, that's elemental, and yes, it could be that I have done it before. However I am not sure that I am able to remember where, but if I do I will put this temp to appropriate TP. Also, most likely, when and if i used bits of text from one article for writing in another, then, it was again probably my own. Anyhow, I will be sure to use it every time I am reusing any amount of text from now on. Cheers.--'''౪ Santa ౪''''''''99°''''' 16:02, 17 March 2021 (UTC)

Narenta

Hi Santasa, my dictionary of ancient Greek mentions for the term "emporion" the meanings "trading place", "trading city" and "market".--Ulamm (talk) 17:20, 27 June 2026 (UTC)