User Talk: Scope creep

Server-side rendered snapshot of this editor's Wikipedia talk page discussions.

Archive 1
Archive 2
Archive 3
Archive 4
Archive 5
Archive 6
Archive 7
Archive 8
Archive 9
Archive 10
Archive 11
Archive 12
Archive 13
Archive 14
Archive 15

The Janitor (Scrubs) ↗

There’s been multiple sources speculating about his return in the revival season of Scrubs. I believe that he is notable. Let me know what you think. MrHunter25 (talk) 19:55, 22 January 2026 (UTC)
:{{ping|MrHunter25}} I watched it religiously. If its a news, it will be popular. Revert it. Somebody else may review it though. '''scope_creepTalk''' 20:59, 22 January 2026 (UTC)
::::I’ve only just started watching it. MrHunter25 (talk) 23:24, 22 January 2026 (UTC)
::I’ve been reverted again. MrHunter25 (talk) 23:59, 22 January 2026 (UTC)
:::{{ping|MrHunter25}} You can't revert it. It has been sent to Afd and decision was a redirect. You can't revert it again or likely blocked. '''scope_creepTalk''' 04:46, 23 January 2026 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

{| style="background-color: var(--background-color-success-subtle, #fdffe7); border: 1px solid var(--border-color-success, #fceb92); color: var(--color-base, #202122);"
|rowspan="2" style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 5px;" | 100px ↗
|style="font-size: x-large; padding: 3px 3px 0 3px; height: 1.5em;" | '''The Barnstar of Diligence'''
|-
|style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;" | For all of your hard work at AfDs. Keep it up, 4,000+ strong! Iljhgtn (''they/them'' ↗ · talk) 16:19, 26 January 2026 (UTC)
|}
::{{ping|Iljhgtn}} Thank you. Its well appreciated. I don't think I've seen it before, which makes it more cool. '''scope_creepTalk''' 16:21, 26 January 2026 (UTC)
:::Seen what? This barnstar!? It is a pretty common one, and well deserved. Iljhgtn (''they/them'' ↗ · talk) 16:22, 26 January 2026 (UTC)

''The Signpost'': 29 January 2026

<div lang="en" dir="ltr" class="mw-content-ltr"><div style="column-count:2;"> {{Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/2026-01-29}} </div> <div class="hlist" style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;"> * '''Read this Signpost in full ↗''' * Single-page ↗ * Unsubscribe ↗ * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:29, 29 January 2026 (UTC) </div></div>

List of schools in Zimbabwe

There is currently a discussion at Talk:List of schools in Zimbabwe#Keep the blue links only ↗. You can join the discussion if you like. BhikhariInformer (talk) 14:56, 30 January 2026 (UTC)
::Hi {{ping|BhikhariInformer}} How goes it. Unfortunately I don't know much about this. I don't even think I've even worked on a school article to be honest, even taken one to Afd, so I'll have to give it a miss. Thanks for considering me though. '''scope_creepTalk''' 11:07, 1 February 2026 (UTC)
:::No worries at all! I just thought that I'd check in since your policy inputs are always very sharp. But I completely understand. Thanks! BhikhariInformer (talk) 14:49, 1 February 2026 (UTC)

Women in Red February 2026

{| style="border: 5px solid #ABCDEF ;"
|rowspan="2" style="vertical-align:middle;" |
|rowspan="2" |
|style="padding: 0; vertical-align: middle; height: 1.1em;" | right|100px ↗'''<big>Women in Red ↗</big>''' <big>|</big> February 2026, Vol 12, Issue 2, Nos 358, 359, 361, 362, 363 
 
'''Online events:'''

''New'': Alphabet run: countries starting with B ↗ <big>|</big> Black Women ↗ <big>|</big> Works by women: theatre, opera, music ↗

''Continuing'': #1day1woman ↗ ( year-long initiative) <big>|</big> Sports ↗ (year-long initiative)

'''Announcements from other communities'''

Join Wikipedia:26 for '26 ↗ and create or substantially improve twenty-six Wikipedia articles during the year 2026, at least one for each letter of the English alphabet.

'''Tip of the month:'''

Our redlists ↗ are a great resource, but not every redlinked subject is notable. Be sure to research before starting a new article.

'''Other ways to participate:'''

Become a member ↗. You can always opt-out of notifications ↗.

Join the conversations on our talkpage ↗.

Help us plan future events ↗ and add any general ideas on developing the project.

frameless|15px ↗ Instagram ↗ '''|'''
frameless|15px ↗ Pinterest ↗
|}
--Lajmmoore (talk 22:50, 31 January 2026 (UTC) via MassMessaging

January–February 2026 NPP drive - Phase 2

thumb|right|270px|NPP unreviewed article statistics as of February 02, 2026 ↗
Welcome to Phase 2 of the January–February 2026 NPP drive ↗. During Phase 1, we reviewed 16,658 articles and 4,416 redirects, and there is currently a backlog of 16,475 articles and 23,782 redirects in the queue. Fantastic job! Completing 22,502 patrols in the first phase made a significant dent in the backlog. Let's keep our foot on the gas for Phase 2, and I hope we can achieve even more reviews than Phase 1. Best of luck!
<div class="center" style="width:auto; margin-left:auto; margin-right:auto;">{{Clickable button 2|Special:NewPagesFeed|Start patrolling!|class=mw-ui-progressive}}</div>
{{clear}}
You are receiving this message because you added your name to the participants list ↗.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:21, 2 February 2026 (UTC)


link=|25px|alt=Information icon ↗ There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents ↗ regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Scope creep AfD's hoax analysis, harassing in Royiswariii's talk page ↗. ROY is WAR '''''Talk!''''' 11:51, 5 February 2026 (UTC)

Nomination of :Foodics ↗ for deletion

<div class="afd-notice">
<div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0;">48px|alt=|link= ↗</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article :Foodics ↗ is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines ↗ or whether it should be deleted ↗.

The article will be discussed at '''Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Foodics ↗''' until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.</div>

Pinging you since you nominated it the first time. MightyRanger (talk) 07:57, 6 February 2026 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 7

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Robinson papers ↗, a link pointing to the disambiguation page Red Orchestra ↗ was added.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:57, 7 February 2026 (UTC)

Question from Rettebdael (12:40, 12 February 2026)

Hi Scope Creep, new to this, wanting to give back to the site that has given me so much. Have you got any hints/tips for starting out with updating on Wikipedia? --Rettebdael (talk) 12:40, 12 February 2026 (UTC)
::Hi {{ping|Rettebdael}} How are you? I've left a welcome message on your talk page, more like a landing page. Please take a look at that first as it has a load of links which lead to different parts of Wikipedia. It may provide some ideas for future development. Generally you could start out by updating articles via Wikipedia:maintenance ↗ tasks. These are a whole series different tasks like e.g. spell checking or fixing grammer. Each maintenance task has a wikiproject, an area where folk gather to consult, plan and schedule. For example, the grammer team is at Wikipedia:WikiProject Grammar ↗. There is Wikiprojects for all sorts of task. A lot of the tasks depend on your the particular strengths and weakness and what you like and dislike. Doing something like fixing grammer for example would be ideal if you had a good command of English grammer, which I don't have, so I would never tackle it. Fixing vandalism is another thing you can look it. Both of these types of task will get you used to the layout of the article, how they are structured depending on its type. A lot of that kind of stuff is automatically done through scripting so may not be as rewarding as first thought but will get you experience of what good articles look like and more so, what bad articles look like. If your particularly good at English and have some writing and research experience you could have a go at updating an article that has particular fault. For example, in the maintenance tasks list there is the section called "Improve lead sections". The lead/lede (two spellings) sections in the article are particularly problematic as they provide the opening context or meaning of what the subject is about. Its essentially a summary of the article and needs to be accurate. They are generally quite easy to write but easy to get wrong. For the reader a wrong lead is problematic. Fixing the WP:LEAD ↗ in small WP:STUB ↗'s, (small stubby articles) are fairly easy, just by reading the article and writing what you think the summary should be. Lastly, please check out the WP:TEAHOUSE ↗ for new editors, a place to ask questions, WP:Help desk ↗ for asking technical questions about problems on Wikipedia and the reference desk at WP:Reference desk ↗ for difficult factual problems that need resolved. Right, I'll leave it there for the moment. Its a lot to take in, but don't worry too much about it. The knowledge seeps in. I can check some of your work and provide some help at any time. Ping me any time. To do that type in <nowiki>{{ping|Scope creep}}</nowiki>. I'm here most days, except on holiday which I was last week. Hope that helps. '''scope_creepTalk''' 14:56, 20 February 2026 (UTC)

pblocked for one month from Project space

You've been repeatedly warned, and previously blocked for behaviour such as what you exhibited at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Colet (singer) ↗. Harassing, attacking and threatening those who disagree with you is not something the project tolerates, and no amount of warnings seems to deter you. I hope you use this month to rethink your attitude. Owen× <big>☎</big> 00:55, 13 February 2026 (UTC)

ANI discussion closed, warning

I have closed the ANI discussion about your behavior at AfD https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents&oldid=1338337769#Concerns_regarding_an_AFD_source_analysis ↗. There was consensus to warn you for your behavior and consensus against a topic ban. Please always treat your fellow editors with respect, assume good faith, and be polite. Do not make personal attacks or threaten retaliation for actions you disagree with. '''Toadspike [[User talk:Toadspike|[Talk]]]''' 15:55, 14 February 2026 (UTC)

''The Signpost'': 17 February 2026

<div lang="en" dir="ltr" class="mw-content-ltr"><div style="column-count:2;"> {{Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/2026-02-17}} </div> <div class="hlist" style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;"> * '''Read this Signpost in full ↗''' * Single-page ↗ * Unsubscribe ↗ * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:01, 17 February 2026 (UTC) </div></div>

Question from ProFactDem (19:33, 19 February 2026)

Hello, I'm not ready to edit any entries today, but it's to meet you. --ProFactDem (talk) 19:33, 19 February 2026 (UTC)
::Hi {{ping|ProFactDem}} How goes it? Nice to meet you as well. No worries. I've left you a welcome message on your talk page, which looks like a landing page. Take a look at it when you have time. I'm here most days except when on holidays like I was last week. ping me whenever you need me. To do that type in <nowiki>{{ping|Scope creep}}</nowiki> Lastly, please check out the WP:TEAHOUSE ↗ for new editors, a place to ask questions. Hope that helps. '''scope_creepTalk''' 15:05, 20 February 2026 (UTC)

Question from Holy Spirit Fourth (01:27, 23 February 2026)

My Lif vIs Mad Public, United States Of America Government Is Using A Ouija Board, Life Is A Life Set By Tested And Boasted.

I Don't Use Violence , The King 4 Use's The King Truth. --Holy Spirit Fourth (talk) 01:27, 23 February 2026 (UTC)

Question from Robdiamond116 (14:17, 23 February 2026)

Hello, am very thrilled to have you as my mentor. Please how do I have my name added to Wikipedia such that people can look up to my name and access my detailed biography --Robdiamond116 (talk) 14:17, 23 February 2026 (UTC)
::Hi {{ping|Robdiamond116}} How are you? Welcome to Wikipedia on your first edit. Well generally you don't add a detailed biography of yourself unless you are considered notable and there is a policy known as Conflict of Interest ↗ that governs the ways it is written. Generally when a person is writing about themselves, the article tends to be bit skewed, be a bit unbalanced and a bit puffy or promotional so it is generally discouraged but it can be done if you are notable and sources are available. I would write it for you. There is an area you can write about yourself until your hearts content that is known as the user page. Yours in located at User:Robdiamond116. Here is an example of an editor with a good user page User:Cullen328. You can see how Cullen describes what is background and how he came to Wikipedia and so on. Now your here, I've added a thing called a template to your talk page here User talk:Robdiamond116 which is essentially a landing page full of links to help you find stuff, which takes a bit of time. I recently discovered a new area on Wikipedia which I didn't know about so don't worry too much about being overwhelmed. It takes time to settle in. There is areas and folk to help you. One is an noticeboard called the WP:TEAHOUSE ↗, which is for new editors to ask questions. There is a lot of folk up there to help you. I'm in every day unless I'm on holiday, so you can contact at any time and i'll available to help on most things. If I see one of your messages I'll be there right away. I hope that helps to get your started. Contact me anytime about anything. '''scope_creepTalk''' 15:04, 23 February 2026 (UTC)

Women in Red - March 2026

{| style="border: 5px solid #ABCDEF ;"
|rowspan="2" style="vertical-align:middle;" |
|rowspan="2" |
|style="padding: 0; vertical-align: middle; height: 1.1em;" | right|75px ↗'''<big>Women in Red ↗</big>''' <big>|</big> March 2026, Vol 12, Issue 3, Nos 358, 359, 364, 365, 366 
 
'''Online events:'''

''March 1-31'': Artists & Activists ↗ <big>|</big> Artworks by women ↗ <big>|</big> Alphabet run: countries starting with C ↗

''Continuing (year-long initiatives)'': #1day1woman ↗ <big>|</big> Sports ↗

'''Announcements from other communities:'''

Celebrate Women ↗

Unreferenced articles backlog drive ↗

Wiki Loves Ramadan ↗

'''Tip of the month:'''

''Those experiencing difficulties with new articles can follow the guidance in our essays ↗,{{br}} perhaps starting with our Ten Simple Rules ↗.''

'''Other ways to participate:'''

Become a member ↗. You can always opt-out of notifications ↗.

Join the conversations on our talkpage ↗.

Help us plan future events ↗ and add any general ideas on developing the project.

frameless|15px ↗ Instagram ↗ '''|'''
frameless|15px ↗ Pinterest ↗
|} --Rosiestep (talk) 09:30, 25 February 2026 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Disambiguation link notification for February 25

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Perdido Street Station ↗, a link pointing to the disambiguation page Robert Wood ↗ was added.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 11:58, 25 February 2026 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Georg Schumann.png

35px|text-top|left|⚠|link= ↗ Thanks for uploading ''':File:Georg Schumann.png ↗'''. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use ↗. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media ↗).

Note that any non-free images not used in any '''articles''' will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion ↗. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:20, 26 February 2026 (UTC)

Question from Pepere'slibrary on Harriet E. Wilson ↗ (19:26, 27 February 2026)

Hi!
Is this a proper reference for Harriet E. Wilson? In my retirement I've been reading a sizeable collection of books handed down from my dad's father. My habit is to research terms, words and people that I'm unfamiliar with. One such book is Experiment Perilous, by Margaret Carpenter. Published by Little, Brown and Company 1943. In the story one Dr. Huntingdon Bailey is the lead character/hero. At the bottom of page 108 appears this sentence: "Dr. Bailey's office secretary-nurse was called Harriet Wilson and, unlike the lady who had born that name some time earlier, had as anonymous a personality as the name suggested." --Pepere'slibrary (talk) 19:26, 27 February 2026 (UTC)
::Hi {{ping|Pepere'slibrary}} How goes it? Not really unfortunately. Its not a good reference. I think the book is fiction and shes mentioned on the periphery. It does show she was known though which means there is more references out there. Try looking at https://www.jstor.org/ ↗, Google Books and the Internet Archive, Refseek. There seems to be plenty on the women. I see they made the book it into a film Experiment Perilous ↗. This women is famous. There is a mountain of coverage. It goes on an on and on, e.g.

::* {{cite journal |last1=Elwood-Farber |first1=Lisa |title=Harriet Wilson's Our Nig : A Look at the Historical Significance of a Novel that Exposes a Century's Worth of Hypocritical Ideology |journal=Women's Studies |date=22 June 2010 |volume=39 |issue=5 |pages=470–489 |doi=10.1080/00497878.2010.484340}}
::* {{cite journal |last1=Ellis |first1=R. J. |title=What Happened to Harriet E. Wilson, née Adams? |journal=Transition |date=2008 |issue=99 |pages=162–168 |jstor=20204269}}
::* https://www.npr.org/2020/02/15/805991106/early-novel-written-by-free-black-woman-called-out-racism-among-abolitionists ↗
::* [https://www.oxfordreference.com/display/10.1093/oi/authority.20110803123546154 ↗
Hope that helps.

I hope you stay. Its a bit overwhelming at first. Take a look at this wee vlog on how create articles: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bRRHR1NEOqE ↗ and this one on how to create references: WP:REFB ↗. Visit the WP:TEAHOUSE ↗ which is a good place for newbs to ask questions. I'm in here every day. Drop me message at any time. Hope that helps. '''scope_creepTalk''' 21:10, 27 February 2026 (UTC)

:Thank you. ~2026-13025-33 ↗ (talk) 03:06, 28 February 2026 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Arvid Harnack 2.jpg

35px|text-top|left|⚠|link= ↗ Thanks for uploading ''':File:Arvid Harnack 2.jpg ↗'''. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use ↗. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media ↗).

Note that any non-free images not used in any '''articles''' will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion ↗. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:10, 7 March 2026 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Mildred Harnack 2.jpg

35px|text-top|left|⚠|link= ↗ Thanks for uploading ''':File:Mildred Harnack 2.jpg ↗'''. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use ↗. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media ↗).

Note that any non-free images not used in any '''articles''' will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion ↗. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 19:43, 7 March 2026 (UTC)

Magyar Abdullah

My recent draft titled above was rejected due to insufficient sources. I have added more sources, including a book on his life and accomplishments. I have a lot more material to add and expand for this important historical figure. Please let me know if it is good enough for publication now. Thanks. Murat (talk) 19:49, 8 March 2026 (UTC)

Request on 03:32:27, 10 March 2026 for assistance on AfC ↗ submission by Hudavendigar

{{anchor|03:32:27, 10 March 2026 review of submission by Hudavendigar}}
{{Lafc|username=Hudavendigar|ts=03:32:27, 10 March 2026|declinedtalk=Draft:Magyar_Abdullah}}


I have added more resources and also some edits to the draft. Can someone look over and tell me if looks good enough to publish? I have other details I will add later.
Murat (talk) 03:32, 10 March 2026 (UTC)

''The Signpost'': 10 March 2026

<div lang="en" dir="ltr" class="mw-content-ltr"><div style="column-count:2;"> {{Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/2026-03-10}} </div> <div class="hlist" style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;"> * '''Read this Signpost in full ↗''' * Single-page ↗ * Unsubscribe ↗ * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:12, 10 March 2026 (UTC) </div></div>

Question from Nimbus Hunt (06:09, 13 March 2026)

Hi scopecreep, You have chosen to be my mentor in here. Here's hoping for a productive period and that we both stay safe in a chaotic world, Nimbus --Nimbus Hunt (talk) 06:09, 13 March 2026 (UTC)
::Hi {{ping|Nimbus Hunt}} How are you? Welcome to Wikipedia!! I'm here most days if you need help. I've left a welcome message on your talk page. Its a whole bunch of links that can help you get a started and help you find stuff. If you need any kind of help on anything at any time, or anything that need explained, drop me a line. Is there anything that your are particularly insterested in doing. '''scope_creepTalk''' 10:07, 13 March 2026 (UTC)

Question from Turkeycrook (10:06, 20 March 2026)

hello, thanks for being my mentor. I have a question about the notices about needing more citations and also information needing to be updated. Does that give specific places that need more citations? basically im asking what those notices really mean and how i should use them. Thanks for your help --Turkeycrook (talk) 10:06, 20 March 2026 (UTC)
::Hi {{ping|Turkeycrook}} How you doing mate? Its good to see you. Yes, the tags are used to define exactly what kind of maintenance needs done to the article. When you put a tag on, its puts the article is particular maintenance category (See WP:PROJCATS ↗). For example, when you look at this maintenance category e.g. <nowiki>Category:Articles with topics of unclear notability</nowiki> (your need to copy into the search box to find it). When you look at this maintenance category, you see a whole load of articles. Somebody has tagged them with Non-notability tag and its placed it thus category. At the other side there editors in different wikiprojects that look/manage and fix each of these in article the category. For each type of tag, there is maintenance category that some group editors are working on. To use tags, try and put the least number in that you can. If you can fix something quickly, e.g. a cleanup, do the cleanup and don't leave a tag. Some of that work is difficult and its better to tag the article so a specialist to take a look at it, later For example, if its a WP:BLP ↗, biography of a living person and there is stuff unsourced and say its been tagged already and not been updated in 6 months, remove the stuff. But if your unsure, e.g. if its unsourced, then tag and leave it for somebody else Eventually you will get experience whats what but try and leave the least tag you can. I'm here for any kind of questions most days. Hope that help. '''scope_creepTalk''' 18:56, 20 March 2026 (UTC)
:::{{ping|Turkeycrook}} This is a maintenance category for articles that needs more citations. <nowiki>Category:All articles needing additional references</nowiki> Don't be too worried at the size. It actually a small list at the moment. You can see its goes back to 2010. Some of them are very hard to source correctly. So you send them to WP:AFD ↗ where folk could discuss whether its worth keeping. '''scope_creepTalk''' 19:01, 20 March 2026 (UTC)
:::Thanks so much that’s a lot of help. I have another question about how I can do as editing on things that I am good at. I’ve found that I’m good at writing articles in a consistent and neutral tone and wanted to see if there’s a way to find articles that need that kind of help. Do filters like that exist? Turkeycrook (talk) 19:08, 20 March 2026 (UTC)
::::{{ping|Turkeycrook}} Yea, kind of. There is a script that runs that provides a list of articles that need worked on that is sent to your talk page. I'll find that for you. Its been a while since I've looked at it. Also take a look at WP:COM ↗. Down at bottom is a list of tasks needing done. You can see more at the task centre here WP:TASKS ↗. Its a boon I think the fact you can write good articles. Probably since your quite new, the best way is to do it through the WP:DRAFT ↗ system. You create an article, publish it in draft using the WP:Article wizard ↗ and then its reviewed by another editor. For new article writers, its a good way of getting constructive feedback quite quickly. If you wrote something, I could review for you. It would great if you could create a bundle of articles. '''scope_creepTalk''' 19:32, 20 March 2026 (UTC)
:::::Okay sounds good. I’ll definitely look into the WP:DRAFT system. Thanks for all the help. Really appreciate it Turkeycrook (talk) 21:13, 20 March 2026 (UTC)
::::{{ping|Turkeycrook}} Once you know the core of writing the article on WP, you just crack on yourself. '''scope_creepTalk''' 19:34, 20 March 2026 (UTC)

Question from Feebee82 (19:24, 20 March 2026)

Hi! While I study for exams I sometimes find little mistakes or outdated information in articles. I often have the resource open and could include it with the correction in the article right away. Am I allowed to do that? And If how does it work? --Feebee82 (talk) 19:24, 20 March 2026 (UTC)
::Hi {{ping|Feebee82}} How its going? Yes, of course you can. Are you using the visual editor or the markdown? Open the article for editing from the edit menu, then make the correction, then leave a summary of your work in the edit summary box at the bottom of the edit window and then hit publish changes. Take a look at WP:HEP ↗. There is a wee video about half-way down on the right that shows you how to edit an article. Its a very old video but its accurate. WP:REB ↗ is another good video. It shows you how to add citations easily. The visual editor, I've not used it but is menu driven so relatively easy to use and uses a similar edit loop. Sometimes when you edit, you might get an edit-conflict. That way I do it is to mark and save the section or sentence you have worked on, close it, refresh the page and then go back and edit again and add your stuff. The software does try and fix it for you when you crack on, but often you have to go back in and fix it manually anyway, sometimes is a pain in the posterior, so its easier to do it that way. Remember to put in a ref for every sentence or every paragraph at least. Hope that helps. '''scope_creepTalk''' 19:57, 20 March 2026 (UTC)

Nomination of :Maria Husarska ↗ for deletion

<div class="afd-notice">
<div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">48px|alt=|link= ↗</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article :Maria Husarska ↗, which you previously '''marked as reviewed''', is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines ↗ or whether it should be deleted ↗. The article will be discussed at '''Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Maria Husarska ↗''' until a consensus is reached, and you are welcomed to contribute to the discussion. SodiumBot (botop|talk ↗|contribs ↗) 22:03, 22 March 2026 (UTC)

{{grey|These updates are delivered by SodiumBot. To opt out of these messages, add <code><nowiki>{{User:SodiumBot/NoNPPDelivery}}</nowiki></code> to your talk page.}}
</div>

A fox for you!

left|150px ↗
Swift help!

Radiobioneer (talk) 12:38, 23 March 2026 (UTC)

Question from Tormidal (21:48, 25 March 2026)

Hi Scope creep! Love the name by the way! I saw you're labelled as my mentor-

I recently made my first edit to Wikipedia, to a thankfully sparsely used or referenced page ( over at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lost_52_Project ).

While feedback on my first change would be phenomenal, I really just have a question or two on the topic of references and sources:

When referencing a webpage for a group or organization, is it helpful to cite a sub-page of that site even though the home page is already referenced? E.g. if MyWebPage.com is already referenced, but I add additional details only found on MyWebPage.com/subPage, should I add that as a second reference?

Additionally, I saw a note when making my edit about using a secondary source(like a news article) instead of a primary source. While this makes sense to avoid bias and interpretation of data, it makes less sense on an article like this where its just the raw data. When is it proper to use a primary source instead? --Tormidal (talk) 21:48, 25 March 2026 (UTC)
::Hi {{ping|Tormidal}} How goes it? Its good to see you. Sorry, I had to remove those two press-releases you added. They are not the best references and are generally WP:PRIMARY ↗. They don't add anything to the article and it is generally frowed upon to use as they provide no value to establishing notability. They are not considered unreliable e.g. Goodreads. When you look at WP:RSP ↗, the perennial sources noticeboard, you can see it lists a load of common references and whether they are unreliable or not. For example goodreads is on it as being unreliable. Its doesn't cover everything but it does a lot of the common day-to-day sites for the ones that are particularly dodgy. Cision is a press-release aggregator. Its a WP:PRIMRY ↗.

::There is a script that flags up they quality of the sources. Its flags them up in the colour red, which not to use. There is reliable sources noticeboard WP:RSN ↗. They will discuss a source to see if its good and come to a consensus whether it is good. There is an archive there you can search to see if its good. On second sources on sites, yes. Some sites are vast, some have millions of pages, so problem putting more in from different parts. WP:SECONDARY ↗ sources are they gold standard for estbalishing notability. For example on a WP:BLP ↗, its some person talking to another person about another person they don't know. They are detached from the original event, so its a truly secondary event and there is many scenario's to guage whether it is secondary, e.g. who is doing the talking. On the last point, your leaving yourself open to getting the article deleted. If it's all WP:PRIMARY ↗ sources, then if somebody sees it will get deleted very quickly at WP:AFD ↗. Only secondary sources can establish notability. Primary sources are for the small details around the subject/event/domain/whatever but it need secondary details to show it has a place here. Hope that helps. '''scope_creepTalk''' 08:29, 26 March 2026 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Adolf Grimme.jpg

35px|text-top|left|⚠|link= ↗ Thanks for uploading ''':File:Adolf Grimme.jpg ↗'''. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use ↗. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media ↗).

Note that any non-free images not used in any '''articles''' will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion ↗. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:48, 26 March 2026 (UTC)

Women in Red – April 2026

{| style="border: 5px solid #ABCDEF ;"
|rowspan="2" style="vertical-align:middle;" |
|rowspan="2" |
|style="padding: 0; vertical-align: middle; height: 1.1em;" | right|75px ↗'''<big>Women in Red ↗</big>''' <big>|</big> April 2026, Vol 12, Issue 4, Nos 358, 359, 367, 368, 369
 
'''Online events:'''

''New'': Countries starting with D, E and F ↗ <big>|</big> Women's Works: Written works ↗ <big>|</big> Cascading Women ↗

''Continuing (year-long initiatives)'': #1day1woman ↗ <big>|</big> Sports ↗

'''Announcements from other communities:'''

CEE women ↗

'''Tip of the month:'''

When creating a new article, take a moment to ensure any notable woman is redlinked.{{br}} Someone might be inspired to create an article for her.

'''Other ways to participate:'''

Become a member ↗. You can always opt-out of notifications ↗.

Join the conversations on our talkpage ↗.

Help us plan future events ↗ and add any general ideas on developing the project.

frameless|15px ↗ Instagram ↗ '''|'''
frameless|15px ↗ Pinterest ↗
|}
--Chocmilk03 (talk) 20:17, 29 March 2026 (UTC) via MassMessaging

''The Signpost'': 31 March 2026

<div lang="en" dir="ltr" class="mw-content-ltr"><div style="column-count:2;"> {{Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/2026-03-31}} </div> <div class="hlist" style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;"> * '''Read this Signpost in full ↗''' * Single-page ↗ * Unsubscribe ↗ * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 10:06, 31 March 2026 (UTC) </div></div>

January–February 2026 NPP backlog drive – Points award

{| style="border: 1px solid gray; background-color: #fdffe7;"
|rowspan="2" style="vertical-align:top;" | 160px ↗
|rowspan="2" |
|style="font-size: x-large; padding: 0; vertical-align: bottom; height: 1.1em;" | '''The Tireless Contributor Barnstar '''  
|-
|style="vertical-align: top; border-top: 1px solid gray;" | This award is given in recognition of Scope creep for accumulating at least 50 points in the January–February 2026 NPP backlog drive. Your contributions helped review 27,750 articles and 7,050 redirects during the drive. Thank you so much for taking part and helping reduce the backlog! – '''Dream'''Rimmer ■ 16:53, 4 April 2026 (UTC)
|}

January–February 2026 NPP backlog drive – Backlog Crusher Award

{| style="border: 1px solid gray; background-color: #fdffe7;"
|rowspan="2" style="vertical-align:top;" | 160px ↗
|rowspan="2" |
|style="font-size: x-large; padding: 0; vertical-align: bottom; height: 1.1em;" | '''Backlog Crusher Award '''  
|-
|style="vertical-align: top; border-top: 1px solid gray;" | This award is given in recognition of Scope creep for reviewing at least 50 pages that were more than 40 days old at the time of review during the January–February 2026 NPP backlog drive. Your contributions helped reduce the older backlog and made an important impact during the drive. Thank you so much for taking part and helping reduce the backlog! – '''Dream'''Rimmer ■ 17:12, 4 April 2026 (UTC)
|}

Question from Jellowriter333 (17:52, 5 April 2026)

I added some things to a wikipedia article and now it appears to be gone. What happened? --Jellowriter333 (talk) 17:53, 5 April 2026 (UTC)
::{{ping|Jellowriter333}} What article was it? '''scope_creepTalk''' 18:44, 5 April 2026 (UTC)

Question from Md jillul hoq rasel on Talk:Shanan, Saudi Arabia ↗ (19:00, 9 April 2026)

Hlw --Md jillul hoq rasel (talk) 19:00, 9 April 2026 (UTC)

Question from BlackMiomi (23:03, 9 April 2026)

Hello i would like to know why my drafts are being deleted even though they are verified facts --BlackMiomi (talk) 23:03, 9 April 2026 (UTC)
::Hi {{ping|BlackMiomi}} How are you? I'm assuming its this draft here Draft:Oloma ↗ your talking about. It's not been deleted. On the 9th April it was reviewed and it didn't pass the review. The reason for that is that large sections of the article are unsourced. The message that was left doesn't really doesn't tell you whats going on although it does say its "not supported by reliable sources" meaning it is missing references. That means the article fails WP:V ↗. Whole sections of the article are unsourced, for example the "Geography" section. Each sentence generally needs a source. Your 3 references while not standard are not bad. If they were in a standard format it would be easier on the reviewer. Take a look at WP:REFB ↗. There is a wee video half-way down which describes how they are created. I see you missted the <nowiki>{{Reflist}}</nowiki> tag. I've added that in, which rationalises your refs in a correct place and seems to fix a whole bunch red links at the bottom. Your also missing page numbers, which will make it difficult for the reader to find your refences. So what its needs before its resubmitted it to 1) Add more references. 2) Try and make them standard looking 3) Add page numbers so folk can find the page. Hope that helps. I removed the stub tag at the bottom. Its not a stub anymore. If you need help, leave a message here. '''scope_creepTalk''' 01:36, 10 April 2026 (UTC)

Question from Daltonius (13:09, 15 April 2026)

I guess you are my editing mentor. Is it just me or has Wikipedia become extremely left leaning and progressive? Or has it always been that way and I'm just realizing it? Every conservative I look up is labeled as a far-right conspiracy theorist. I'm trying to change that. --Daltonius (talk) 13:09, 15 April 2026 (UTC)
::Hi {{ping|Daltonius}} How goes it? Nice to meet you. I don't know if Wikipedia is left-leaning or a right-leaning to be honest. It is what it is. I think you have a large number of people cooperating to produce a produce a product, in this case millions of article, the group effect tends to be left-wing at scale. I've not actually looked at it but I think that it is only way it works. Folk strive for honesty on here. We are not looking for a political viewpoint or importing any particular political or otherwise. Wikipedia has a very strict policy on this called WP:NPOV ↗. Its is used to ensure that articles are balanced and neutral. Wikipedia strives for accuracy and if you seeing a conversative figure being right wing and talking about conspiracy theories then its likely the case that the person is right-wing and a conspiracy theorist. You must strive for accuracy on here. Not what thing should be but what they actually are. Folk strive for facts here and nothing else. If you plan to edit I would leave the politics at the door. What articles are you talking about specifically. '''scope_creepTalk''' 13:49, 15 April 2026 (UTC)
:::Specifically, MTG, Lauren Boebert, Matt Walsh among other popular politicians. But then they call Ben Shapiro, who opposes same-sex marriage and believes being transgender is a mental illness, a traditional conservative. I'm just wondering who decides what's extreme and getting a feel for the trust level. Wikipedia chooses to include politicians which I love. I just think that if the aim is to create a pure encyclopedia, defining anybody as extreme or conspiracy theorist or even moderate is antithesis unless it's directly linked to a specific event. I'll keep paying attention and thanks for sharing your perspective. Daltonius (talk) 16:35, 15 April 2026 (UTC)
::::{{ping|Daltonius}} The notability of these types of articles that are known as a Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons ↗ ,is based on WP:SECONDARY ↗ sources. These types of references are the gold standard, essentially meaning somebody talking to somebody else about the person, who doesn't know that person. WP:SECONDARY defines it as as "analysis, evaluation, interpretation, or synthesis of the facts, evidence, concepts, and ideas taken from primary sources." So its one removed. Secondary source ↗ has a good description of its function. Take a look at WP:V ↗ as well, which is a policy. Folk are described by their actions. Everything that MTG has said and done is recorded somewhere usually in a newspaper or somewhere else and that it telling. I'm assuming that MTG is Marjorie Taylor Greene ↗. Anybody that reads a paper knows that she is a well know conspiracy theorist. Most republican figures in the US are to the right of the UK tories which makes them far-right on the political spectrum. While it is well known to those who think and read that she is a conspiracy theorist, it still has to be verified WP:V ↗, to a reliable WP:RS ↗, secondary source.WP:SECONDARY ↗ reference and then the content must be balanced and neutral WP:NPOV ↗. I could tell you why MTG is a conspiracy theorist, but your not generally allowed to espouse your own views on here. Its strictly about the encyclopeadic aspect and nothing else. '''scope_creepTalk''' 17:30, 15 April 2026 (UTC)

Question from Antostephen360 on User:Antostephen360/sandbox (06:16, 18 April 2026)

Hello, how can I write my biography --Antostephen360 (talk) 06:16, 18 April 2026 (UTC)
::Hi {{ping|Antostephen360}} How goes it? Wikipedia is not the place to write your own biography even if you are notable. Writing your own biography is frowned upon and can lead to significant problems. Folk who do it have an inherent Conflict of interest ↗ that can result in the article being biased somehow leading to other problems like WP:NPOV ↗ for example, which is only one of the problem types that can appear. Please take a look at this Wikipedia:An article about yourself isn't necessarily a good thing ↗. '''scope_creepTalk''' 07:35, 21 April 2026 (UTC)

''The Signpost'': 21 April 2026

<div lang="en" dir="ltr" class="mw-content-ltr"><div style="column-count:2;"> {{Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/2026-04-21}} </div> <div class="hlist" style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;"> * '''Read this Signpost in full ↗''' * Single-page ↗ * Unsubscribe ↗ * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:48, 21 April 2026 (UTC) </div></div>

Question from Theodorewiki1 (01:52, 27 April 2026)

Well I guess you can start here huh? --Theodorewiki1 (talk) 01:52, 27 April 2026 (UTC)
::{{ping|Theodorewiki1}} Hows its going? Yes, I'm your mentor. I guess so. I've posted a welcome template to your talk page and that will help you get around, which will give you a start. Are you hoping to write some articles? '''scope_creepTalk''' 06:42, 27 April 2026 (UTC)

New pages patrol May 2026 Backlog drive

{| style="border: 2px solid #36c; border-radius: 4px; background: linear-gradient(to right, #ffffff, #eaf3ff); padding: 10px; color: #000;"
| style="vertical-align: middle; font-size: 130%" | May 2026 Backlog Drive ↗ | '''New pages patrol ↗''' 
| rowspan=3 | right|100px ↗
|-
|

On 1 May 2026, a one-month backlog drive for New Page Patrol will begin.

Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles patrolled.

Barnstars will also be granted for re-reviewing articles previously reviewed by other patrollers during the drive.

Each review will earn 1 point.

Interested in taking part? '''Sign up here ↗'''.

|-
|colspan=2 style="font-size:85%; padding-top:15px;"|You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here. ↗
|}
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:24, 29 April 2026 (UTC)

Question from Olololol0js (19:55, 29 April 2026)

How do I make a new page --Olololol0js (talk) 19:55, 29 April 2026 (UTC)
::Hello {{ping|Olololol0js}} Welcome to Wikipedia. To create a new article cyou would use WP:DRAFT ↗. You create a draft, its published, then reviewed by an independent editor. Hope that helps. '''scope_creepTalk''' 05:45, 30 April 2026 (UTC)

Women in Red – May 2026

{| style="border: 5px solid #ABCDEF ;"
|rowspan="2" style="vertical-align:middle;" |
|rowspan="2" |
|style="padding: 0; vertical-align: middle; height: 1.1em;" | right|75px ↗'''<big>Women in Red ↗</big>''' <big>|</big> May 2026, Vol 12, Issue 5, Nos 358, 359, 370, 371, 372
 
'''Online events:'''

''New'': Countries starting with G and H ↗ <big>|</big> Women's scientific works ↗ <big>|</big> Religion and Spirituality ↗

''Continuing (year-long initiatives)'': #1day1woman ↗ <big>|</big> Sports ↗

'''Announcements from other communities:'''

''Contest'': Destubathon of the Americas ↗

'''Tip of the month:'''

Struggling to find scientific works to write about? Start with review articles or textbooks,{{br}} which may highlight influential studies, theories or methods by women.

'''Other ways to participate:'''

Become a member ↗. You can always opt-out of notifications ↗.

Join the conversations on our talkpage ↗.

Help us plan future events ↗ and add any general ideas on developing the project.

frameless|15px ↗ Instagram ↗ '''|'''
frameless|15px ↗ Pinterest ↗
|}
--Chocmilk03 (talk) 04:50, 30 April 2026 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Indirect ping

Hello again @Scope creep - not sure if you were pinged but..... Draft:Alexander R. A. Anderson ↗ - greetings from ChrysGalley (talk) 18:42, 6 May 2026 (UTC)
::Hi {{ping|ChrysGalley}} Thanks for informing me! '''scope_creepTalk''' 19:18, 6 May 2026 (UTC)

AfC Request

Hello @Scope creep, I want to ask if you can review my article Draft:Eliot K-8 Innovation School ↗, if that is possible for you. I would appreciate it! Welovecontributors! [talk ↗] [contribs ↗] 01:05, 8 May 2026 (UTC)
::{{ping|Welovecontributors}} I'm sorry but I don't know anything about schools. I tend to avoid them at WP:NPP ↗/WP:AFC ↗. '''scope_creepTalk''' 19:03, 8 May 2026 (UTC)

Question from Fishyfish2 on Tornado outbreak sequence of April 23–28, 2026 ↗ (09:03, 8 May 2026)

There was an ef3 tornado in mineral wells tx that injured 5 people and destroyed a big stretch of the town. Maybe someone could word it better

https://spectrumlocalnews.com/tx/south-texas-el-paso/news/2026/05/06/mineral-wells-tornado-recovery --Fishyfish2 (talk) 09:03, 8 May 2026 (UTC)

Vandalism

Thanks for clarifying I am not a vandal and "intentionally pointing out this is the official Percy Shelley account after 20 years." That was one of the last times I saw my grandfather. Jellocube (talk) 18:48, 8 May 2026 (UTC)
: Hi {{ping|Jellocube}} I never replied to this before as it's has been sometime since I left that warning, almost 2 years ago. You put a brass plate notice for instructions to the reader in the Quenya ↗ article, the type you would find in software documentation that was completely unsuitable for a encyclopeada. You '''never''' leave instructions for the reader, particularly something that is a of a commercial nature. Its it is a clear fail of WP:NOT ↗. Its so crass its almost beyond belief and is clearly vandalism and disruptive. I wouldn't do it again. '''scope_creepTalk''' 06:57, 12 May 2026 (UTC)

Judith Turner

Hello @Scope creep - the page on Judith Turner was authored by yours truly without the use of AI. Thanks, Dieter Djanssen (talk) 15:05, 11 May 2026 (UTC)
::{{ping|Djanssen}} Then why does reads likes its been been written by a LLM? How do you explain that? I have reviewed ↗ a lot of these articles types now and can recognise AI text like the sun coming up. You introduce whole concepts that haven't been spoken about before and never explained, making it unreadable for the general reader. The whole convoluted language of these sections is completely non-encyclopeadic. I understand that artists have a particular rationale that is sometimes particularly hard to explain, even to themselves and getting that across to the general reader is sometime difficult, but having written several artists articles myself I know it can be done. I would suggest your rewrite the sections, offline. If they go back in, in that state, then it's Afd with a deletion tag WP:TNT ↗. It will get deleted, I can assure you and rewritten by somebody else. '''scope_creepTalk''' 15:17, 11 May 2026 (UTC)
:::Djanssen, I saw what you wrote. It was not good. Drmies (talk) 15:22, 11 May 2026 (UTC)

Felix Schaffgotsche ↗ - lead

@Scope creep - hello. The mainspace Felix Schaffgotsche ↗ has a "lead too short" template. I worked with Mr. Huey regarding the lead section (he is declared COI) and we have come up with a new lead section. For the moment I have left the template but I am minded to remove it. Do you have any comments on the new lead? Thanks. ChrysGalley (talk) 09:19, 12 May 2026 (UTC)
::{{ping|ChrysGalley}} That is a solid bit of work and quick as well. Well impressed. I wish everybody was so quick. '''scope_creepTalk''' 11:42, 12 May 2026 (UTC)

Question from Allieaard (17:43, 14 May 2026)

Hi, I am drafting a new page about the San Francisco film commission. There is an interesting history behind the department and its incentive programs in the past and in the present. I want to include a list of movies/shows filmed in San Francisco under the incentive. Can anyone give any suggestions on this page? Is it suitable for Wikipedia, is there a better format I should take like just a list or something, or any advice would be helpful! This is my first Wikipedia page --Allieaard (talk) 17:43, 14 May 2026 (UTC)
::Hi {{ping|Allieaard}} How are you mate. That sounds like an excellent idea for an historial article on Film SF. If the movies are notable and have coverage ↗, then can go in a well. Do a section on the background, formation, on the department, reason for coming into existance, folk who set it up, sucesses, failures, and have a section of films + other salient details. Plus images. There is a lot films, series that is really known, that could go in rightaway. If you need any help, ping me. '''scope_creepTalk''' 20:29, 14 May 2026 (UTC)
:::Hi @Scope creep Thank you!!! Is there a way to have you review it before i publish? Allieaard (talk) 22:11, 14 May 2026 (UTC)
::::{{ping|Allieaard}} As I'm involved, I would usually leave it to somebody else to review it, although I give you a load of pointers. '''scope_creepTalk''' 08:23, 16 May 2026 (UTC)
::::{{ping|Allieaard}} Since its the reviewing season at the moment, I would review it for you and fix anything that needs fixed. Ping me when your finished. '''scope_creepTalk''' 08:27, 26 May 2026 (UTC)
:::::I'm finished! Allieaard (talk) 18:55, 27 May 2026 (UTC)
::::::@Scope creep Allieaard (talk) 18:55, 27 May 2026 (UTC)

New Page Patrol Newsletter - May 2026

<div style="border:2px solid #90C0FF; background:#F0F0FF; width:99%; padding:4px">

Hello {{BASEPAGENAME}},

thumb|400px|New Page Review queue November 2025 - May 2026 ↗

'''Backlog update'''

At the time of this message, there are 15,282 articles and 32,951 redirects awaiting review.

After the January–February drive the article backlog was reduced to 15,179 articles and the redirect backlog to 19,053 respectively. Great job! However, both queues are growing rapidly and any additional reviews are highly appreciated.

'''2024 and 2025 NPP Awards'''

74px|left ↗{{no ping|JTtheOG}} was selected as the NPP reviewer of the year for both 2024 and 2025, for reviewing the most articles amongst all reviewers.
{{no ping|Hey man im josh}} and {{no ping|MPGuy2824}} won the Redirect Ninja Master Award for 2024 and 2025 respectively, for reviewing the most redirects.

Overall in 2024, one Platinum, two Gold, eight Silver, 12 Bronze and 45 Iron Barnstars were awarded. Additionally, 66 reviewers got the NPP barnstar for doing more than 100 reviews through the year. In 2025, one Platinum, ten Silver, 13 Bronze and 38 Iron Barnstars were awarded. Additionally, 38 reviewers got the NPP barnstar for doing more than 100 reviews through the year.

{{no ping|BoyTheKingCanDance}}, {{no ping|Rosiestep}}, {{no ping|SunDawn}}, and {{no ping|Vanderwaalforces}} were inducted into the NPP Hall of Fame ↗ for having two separate years of 2,000+ article reviews.

'''January–February backlog drive'''

The experimental two-month long backlog drive concluded with 183 reviewers patrolling over 27,761 articles and 35,309 redirects, earning over 36,836 points. Congratulations to {{no ping|JTtheOG}}, who achieved first place with 6,484.6 points in this drive.

'''May backlog drive'''

An article-only backlog drive is currently underway. We are hoping to make a big dent in the backlog. You can read more about it or join at Wikipedia:New pages patrol/Backlog drives/May 2026 ↗.

'''PageTriage'''

An attempt was made to get the New Pages Feed ↗ to sort by date marked as reviewed instead of date created. However we had to revert it due to bugs. We may try again in the future. You can subscribe to the Phabricator ticket ↗ if you're interested in following along.

{{refbegin}}
'''Reminders:'''

You can access live chat with patrollers on the New Page Patrol Discord ↗.

Consider adding the project discussion page ↗ to your watchlist.

To opt out of future mailings, please remove yourself here ↗.

{{refend}}
</div>

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:38, 14 May 2026 (UTC)

Trom

Good day! I made a second attempt at converting Trom ↗ to a disambiguation page. Hopefully this edit will be better than the first attempt. ~2026-29508-33 ↗ (talk) 13:08, 16 May 2026 (UTC)

Blanking and immediately restoring disambiguation pages

I noticed you did this at least twice, namely with Piek ↗ and Mowla ↗. Is there any particular reason why? Duckmather (talk) 07:01, 20 May 2026 (UTC)
::Hi {{ping|Duckmather}} How are you? Possibly slow in the upkeep, since its early in the morning for me. I know there are certain rules around it and at first glance they don't look like disamb articles but then they do once I examine them properly. '''scope_creepTalk''' 07:06, 20 May 2026 (UTC)

''The Signpost'': 22 May 2026

<div lang="en" dir="ltr" class="mw-content-ltr"><div style="column-count:2;"> {{Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/2026-05-22}} </div> <div class="hlist" style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;"> * '''Read this Signpost in full ↗''' * Single-page ↗ * Unsubscribe ↗ * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 05:17, 22 May 2026 (UTC) </div></div>

Morning Call

Thank you for the message you left on my Talk page.

The reason I reverted it is because I see Morning Call and The Call as different programmes, and of course Morning Call is back on air after many years. That said, I can see why you opted for redirect, with the intent being to effectively merge the original ''Morning Call'' with ''The Call'' which effectively replaced it, but it also meant that some information was lost, which is what usually happens with mergers.

I also considered your comment that Morning Call would not survive an AfD and I agree which is why I did not re-revert. Therefore to stop the important Morning Call information being lost to Wikipedia, I have added a separate section for ''Morning Call'' to ''The Call'' to ensure that the information contained in that article is retained. I hope you agree that this is a good compromise. Rillington (talk) 14:38, 24 May 2026 (UTC)
::Hi {{ping|Rillington}} Yip. Often these things can be reverted if good sources can found. Hopefully that will happen sometime in the future, maybe a encyclopedia of morning programmes. Who knows. Thanks for not reverting it, in the meantime. '''scope_creepTalk''' 16:53, 24 May 2026 (UTC)
:::I think it is very unlikely that references would now be found for a programme that ended so long ago and it is very possible than an AfD would have occurred sooner or later and as you said before, I don't think it would have survived. This way the salient information is retained and an article for the new early-morning programme can be written in the future, and there are bound to be references to ensure it would survive any AfD attempt. Rillington (talk) 15:54, 25 May 2026 (UTC)

Ben 10

Hi there, I saw that you removed a large swath of information from List of Ben 10 characters ↗. Was there a reason for this? The page is now completely missing any mention of Ben's aliens. Realshow19 (talk) 01:22, 25 May 2026 (UTC)
::Hi {{ping|Realshow19}} How goes it? The article was reviewed ↗ as part of the latested NPP sprint. All of that content was unsourced. You can't have unsourced content, huge sections of it. Don't add it back unless it sourced. Anybody adding in unsourced content will be issued warnings. '''scope_creepTalk''' 06:49, 25 May 2026 (UTC)
:::Isn't there a template for sections needing citations? I'm not super active here but I do edit for other sites like the Minecraft wiki, usually people don't remove half the page over this. With how it is now, it's broken several redirects and arguably is a little misleading. Realshow19 (talk) 19:40, 25 May 2026 (UTC)
::::{{ping|Realshow19}} The sections were unsourced for more than 6 months, so it is perfectly reasonable to remove the content per established consensus. Wikipedia is not the same as other wikies on the web. First and foremost, its an encyclopedia, so the content must be verifiable. There is a whole series of policies and guidelines that define exactly what can be added, in what format and everything that is added must have a reference per sentence. The stuff can go back if, if its referenced, but if its not referenced properly, it will be pulled. There is a template for section citations missing, but the uncited sections where there for more than 6 months so were removed. You can't slap on a template on an uncited section and expect it to be accepted. That is considered disruptive. An attempt must be made to source each section. If it can't be sourced, don't put it back. Hope that helps. '''scope_creepTalk''' 20:02, 25 May 2026 (UTC)
:::::Was the page assigned to someone specific? I don't know why the sources couldn't just be added when they came into question, it's not up for dispute that these characters are in the show. Removing them entirely gives a pretty poor representation of the subject, everyone is labeled a main character. Even ones in less than ten episodes. Realshow19 (talk) 22:15, 25 May 2026 (UTC)
::::::True, but that is nature of it. Who ever wrote it up didn't want to source. Probably a fan, maybe a young fan who knows. It needs redone really, if its to be kept. There is examples of good series character articles. It just needs to come up to that standard. '''scope_creepTalk''' 22:28, 25 May 2026 (UTC)

Women in Red - June 2026

{| style="border: 5px solid #ABCDEF ;"
|rowspan="2" style="vertical-align:middle;" |
|rowspan="2" |
|style="padding: 0; vertical-align: middle; height: 1.1em;" | right|75px ↗'''<big>Women in Red ↗</big>''' <big>|</big> June 2026, Vol 12, Issue 6, Nos 358, 359, 373, 374, 375
 
'''Online events:'''

''New'': LGBTQ+ women ↗ <big>|</big> Alphabet run: Countries starting with I, J, K and L ↗

''Article improvement campaign'': Orphaned women ↗

''Continuing (year-long initiatives)'': #1day1woman ↗ <big>|</big> Sports ↗

{{hidden|Announcements, tips, participation...|
'''Announcements from other communities:'''

Eiffel women ↗

'''Tip of the month:'''

Consider contributing to two of our monthly events at once, and improve coverage of LGBTQ+ women by de-orphaning their articles.

'''Other ways to participate:'''

Become a member ↗. You can always opt-out of notifications ↗.

Join the conversations on our talkpage ↗.

Help us plan future events ↗ and add any general ideas on developing the project.

|} --Rosiestep (talk) 22:52, 25 May 2026 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Question from Glikethecar (03:43, 26 May 2026)

Hi there Scope creep! For one of my first edits, I'd like to make an edit to the page for Theodore Roosevelt based on info from a book I'm currently reading. Before I do, I want to make sure I can get the citation right.

Here's a link to my sandbox page:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Glikethecar/Referencing_sandbox

Could you help me understand why my book citation is giving an error for the date? That part of the citation should be the date I accessed the source, no? --Glikethecar (talk) 03:44, 26 May 2026 (UTC)
::Hi {{ping|Glikethecar}} Welcome to Wikipedia. I see your excellent wee article. Here is the ref:

::* {{cite book |last1=Gonzalez |first1=Juan |title=Harvest of Empire: A History of Latinos in America |date=25 May 2026 |publisher=Penguin Books |isbn=0-670-86720-9 |page=67|year=2000|location=Penguin Putnam Inc., 275 Hudson Street, New York, New York 10014 U.S.A.|language=En}}

::Generally speaking, you put the location as New York, which is well understoood as a publishing centre. According to Worldcat here: https://search.worldcat.org/title/42002545?oclcNum=42002545 ↗ its dated to 2000. So the date would set to 2000, and year would be removed. So it would be become something like this.

::* {{cite book |last1=Gonzalez |first1=Juan |title=Harvest of Empire: A History of Latinos in America |publisher=Penguin Books |isbn=0-670-86720-9 |page=67|year=2000|location=New York|language=en}}

::The language entry would be lower case. If the article your writing is good and you take eventually take it to WP:GA ↗ for example, they would be expecting to see a oclc attribute/value pair. That links it to worldcat ↗. So it becomes something like:

::* {{cite book |last1=Gonzalez |first1=Juan |title=Harvest of Empire: A History of Latinos in America |publisher=Penguin Books |isbn=0-670-86720-9 |page=67|year=2000|location=New York|language=en|oclc=42002545}}

::Your book also has an edition field. If you took your article to WP:GA ↗ for example and certainly WP:FA ↗, you would expect to see it. If you were writing rigourously, to very high standard, articles that were closed, meaning everything tied up, then you would expect to see an edition field. The book itself will provide it, so it becomes edition=1st or edition=Revised and so on and whatever.

::Lastly, if you wanted to reference a chapter, then fill in the editor fields, and put the main chapter author in last1, first1 and so on, and the chapter name in the chapter field. If you have a web reference and you think its really important, you can archive it in the way back machine. Put in the archive-url and archive-date fields, so its never lost. That cover 95% of the use cases.

::The rest of the refs fine. Excellent wee micro article. Hope that helps.. Stirling work. '''scope_creepTalk''' 08:02, 26 May 2026 (UTC)

Question from Kimakishi (16:13, 6 June 2026)

Hi! I'm super new to editing Wikipedia, obviously, do you have any advice? I think I'm mostly gonna be fixing grammar/linking/punctuation errors, not adding large chunks of info to articles --Kimakishi (talk) 16:13, 6 June 2026 (UTC)
::Hello {{ping|Kimakishi}} Welcome to Wikipedia!! I suggest not leaving any warnings with regular editors. Its called "don't template the regulars". Speak to them instead to explain what your problem is. I would also thank folk who are working with you. You can do that through the editors contribution history. You'll see the undo and thank buttons at each revision entry. That tells folk you appreciate their work and they are more likely to help you in the future. In a way your collecting them. I would say maintain good manners and don't loose your cool in WP:AFD ↗ or any of the admin board discussions. Assume WP:AGF ↗. Try and understand that folk are driven by different motivations on Wikipedia. Its not just the altruistic need to build an encyclopaedia. Others who are getting paid for example, need paid to keep a roof over their head. Others are just trying to preserve a memory of a friend or relative. Handle with care. They may be grieving while they are trying to update the article. A bit of understanding goes a long way. Get to the policies around articles understood, like WP:NPOV ↗, WP:BIO ↗, WP:PRIMARY ↗, WP:SECONDARY ↗, WP:BLP ↗ which is particular important and the WP:NOTABILITY ↗ and WP:V ↗, WP:NACADEMIC ↗. Even though your not creating articles, you must have some appreciation of the polices associated with different subject types. If you ever get around to adding references, take a look a wee training video half-way down the article at WP:REFB ↗. Its really handy. Don't add any social media junk to an article and learn what can be added and what can't in terms of source material. I know I've mentioned quite a quite a lot. Takes a bit of time to leak-in, perhaps months, so don't be too hard on yourself. If your fixing grammar and punctuation errors, perhaps you could join the Wikipedia:WikiProject Guild of Copy Editors ↗. I've added a welcome template your talk page that will help you get around. '''scope_creepTalk''' 18:21, 6 June 2026 (UTC)

== May 2026 NPP backlog drive – Points award ==
{| style="border: 1px solid gray; background-color: #fdffe7;"
|rowspan="2" style="vertical-align:top;" | 160px ↗
|rowspan="2" |
|style="font-size: x-large; padding: 0; vertical-align: bottom; height: 1.1em;" | '''The Order of the Lesser Scribe of Wikipedia '''  
|-
|style="vertical-align: top; border-top: 1px solid gray;" | This award is given in recognition of Scope creep for accumulating at least 350 points in the May 2026 NPP backlog drive. Your contributions helped review 14884 articles during the drive. Thank you so much for taking part and helping reduce the backlog! – '''Dream'''Rimmer ■ 15:56, 12 June 2026 (UTC)
|}
== May 2026 NPP backlog drive – Streak award ==
{| style="border: 1px solid gray; background-color: #e7dddf;"
|rowspan="2" style="vertical-align:middle;" | 100px ↗
|rowspan="2" |
|style="font-size: x-large; padding: 0; vertical-align: middle; height: 1.1em;" |
'''Asymmetric Epicyclic Gears'''
|-
|style="vertical-align: middle; border-top: 1px solid gray; width:100%;" | This award is given in recognition of Scope creep for accumulating at least 50 points during each week of the May 2026 NPP backlog drive. Your contributions helped review 14884 articles during the drive. Thank you so much for taking part and helping reduce the backlog! – '''Dream'''Rimmer ■ 15:56, 12 June 2026 (UTC)
|}

Question from LokiLukiLolli (13:37, 13 June 2026)

hello, how to become mentor as well
(eventuallly) --LokiLukiLolli (talk) 13:37, 13 June 2026 (UTC)
::Hi {{ping|LokiLukiLolli}} You signup at Wikipedia:Mentorship ↗. '''scope_creepTalk''' 18:19, 13 June 2026 (UTC)

Notice of Conflict of interest noticeboard discussion

link=|25px|alt=Information icon ↗ There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard ↗ regarding a possible conflict of interest ↗ incident with which you may be involved. The thread is Consistent sloppy paid editing by WhiteHatWiki ↗. The discussion is about the topic :Topic ↗.  Thank you.

You seem to be one of the editors who has been more aware of these issues. I mentioned you in passing but didn't want to rely on the ping. —~2026-34199-65 ↗ (talk) 11:34, 14 June 2026 (UTC)

Question from Brittneyatchison on Iran and state-sponsored terrorism ↗ (03:49, 15 June 2026)

I noticed that after citation 12 there are absolutely no credible sources to back up the last paragraph and the short paragraph added after. It seems to be speculation or opinion. --Brittneyatchison (talk) 03:49, 15 June 2026 (UTC)
::Hello {{ping|Brittneyatchison}} Welcome to Wikipedia!! Are you talking about the "Other allegations" and "Public responses in Iran" in sections specifically. '''scope_creepTalk''' 06:06, 15 June 2026 (UTC)

Draft:Magyar Abdullah

Hi there. This draft was submitted 4 months ago. I have implemented all suggestions as best as I could and have been refining it ever since. I had left two other related messages here but did not get any feedback. I know you must have much on your plate but what is next? What more can I do? I have sunk much time in this article already and I think it is a decent one. What happens next? Thanks. Murat (talk) 13:08, 20 June 2026 (UTC)
::Hi {{ping|Hudavendigar|label=Murat}} Can you add page numbers, page ranges to each of the references. It certainly looks better. Ping me when your done. Thanks. '''scope_creepTalk''' 13:15, 20 June 2026 (UTC)

''The Signpost'': 21 June 2026

<div lang="en" dir="ltr" class="mw-content-ltr"><div style="column-count:2;"> {{Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/2026-06-21}} </div> <div class="hlist" style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;"> * '''Read this Signpost in full ↗''' * Single-page ↗ * Unsubscribe ↗ * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:19, 21 June 2026 (UTC) </div></div>

Request on 20:24:57, 23 June 2026 for assistance on AfC ↗ submission by Cyril voyant

{{anchor|20:24:57, 23 June 2026 review of submission by Cyril voyant}}
{{Lafc|username=Cyril voyant|ts=20:24:57, 23 June 2026|declinedtalk=Draft:Cyril_Voyant}}


Dear Scope creep,

Thank you for reviewing Draft:Cyril Voyant. I understand the rejection and that publication count alone is not sufficient under WP:ACADEMIC.

I am the subject of the draft and have disclosed my conflict of interest. I will not recreate or resubmit it.

I would only like to ask whether WP:NACADEMIC criterion 1 may apply, based on the citation impact and scholarly use of my work in solar radiation forecasting, especially the 2017 Renewable Energy review paper and the metrics visible in Google Scholar/Scopus.

If these elements are still considered insufficient, I will accept the decision.

Best regards,
Cyril Voyant

Cyril voyant (talk) 20:24, 23 June 2026 (UTC)
::Hi {{ping|Cyril voyant}} I'll take a look at it tommorrow. '''scope_creepTalk''' 20:57, 23 June 2026 (UTC)
:::{{ping|Cyril voyant}} I've asked a colleague to see what they think. '''scope_creepTalk''' 10:01, 2 July 2026 (UTC)

Hey!

Hi, Scope creep,

I was doing some regular tasks, going through stale drafts to tag them for CSD G13 and I noticed your edits in the page history and thought to myself, "That's a name I haven't seen in a while!" I'm not sure if you took a well-deserved Wiki-Break or rotated through other tasks but it was nice to run into you, virtually. We're in a bit of a heatwave right now in the Pacific Northwest of the U.S. but I hope wherever you are and whatever you are doing, you are having a good summer. Take care! '''''L'''''iz '''''Read!''''' ↗ '''''Talk!''''' 06:55, 24 June 2026 (UTC)
::Hi Liz, Good to hear from you. Funny I was thinking about you, a couple of days ago, that I had seen you for ages. Doing well. I've not really been away. I've been working on a several specific articles for ages and not really taken part on anything on Wikipedia or anything on the noticeboards for a long time. We have a heatwave here as well in Scotland. You too. Its great to hear that folk still know me, even though some of the old regulars are beginning to disappear. '''scope_creepTalk''' 07:48, 24 June 2026 (UTC)

Question from Owethu mafe on Microsoft Word ↗ (20:18, 27 June 2026)

How do I copy and paste my work --Owethu mafe (talk) 20:18, 27 June 2026 (UTC)
:Hi, {{ping|Owethu mafe}}, have you written an article in Microsoft Word? '''scope_creepTalk''' 21:20, 27 June 2026 (UTC)
::Owethu mafe I would read this first WP:YFA ↗. You will need to create the article in WP:DRAFT ↗, where it will be reviewed. There is a utility for this: Help:WordToWiki ↗. '''scope_creepTalk''' 21:49, 27 June 2026 (UTC)

Question from BrazilBlox (22:22, 27 June 2026)

Hello! I have a problem, I made a draft article about 2020 in Colorado but I accidentally made the title say Colorado in 2020. How do I fix this? --BrazilBlox (talk) 22:22, 27 June 2026 (UTC)
::{{ping|BrazilBlox}} The reviewer can rename it during the acceptance process of WP:AFC ↗, assuming the reviewer passes it, which won't happen at the moment as the article is effectively unsourced. Its worth reading WP:DRAFT ↗ and WP:YFA ↗. '''scope_creepTalk''' 22:43, 27 June 2026 (UTC)
::{{ping|BrazilBlox}} I've left a note for the reviewer to read. That should be sufficient. '''scope_creepTalk''' 22:57, 27 June 2026 (UTC)

Women in Red in July 2026

<section begin="July" />
{| style="border: 5px solid #ABCDEF ;"
|rowspan="2" style="vertical-align:middle;" |
|rowspan="2" |
|style="padding: 0; vertical-align: middle; height: 1.1em;" | right|75px ↗'''<big>Women in Red ↗</big>''' <big>|</big> July 2026, Vol 12, Issue 7, Nos 358, 359, 376, 377
'''Events:'''

''New'': Crime & law ↗ <big>|</big> Alphabet run: Countries starting with M ↗

''Continuing (year-long initiatives)'': #1day1woman ↗ <big>|</big> Sports ↗

{{hidden|Announcements, tips, participation...|
'''Announcements from other communities:'''
|frameless|100px|right ↗

Women in Red celebrates its 11 Year Anniversary on July 18!

Eiffel women ↗

Developing Countries WikiContest ↗

'''Tip of the month:'''

Working on a group of linked articles? Have you thought about creating a navigation box ↗ for the footer of those pages?

'''Other ways to participate:'''

Become a member ↗. You can always opt-out of notifications ↗.

Join the conversations on our talkpage ↗.

Help us plan future events ↗ and add any general ideas on developing the project.

|}<section end="July" />

--MSGJ (talk 22:15, 28 June 2026 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Typo on your User page

You've typed "Gealic" for "Gaelic". Bibliosporias (talk) 14:10, 29 June 2026 (UTC)
::{{ping|Bibliosporias}} Thanks for that. I didn't notice it. '''scope_creepTalk''' 14:47, 29 June 2026 (UTC)

Question from Mohamed Najah Pookkottur (01:21, 30 June 2026)

When can I make an article Mentor --Mohamed Najah Pookkottur (talk) 01:21, 30 June 2026 (UTC)
::Hi {{ping|Mohamed Najah Pookkottur}} How goes it? I would read WP:YFA ↗ first, which describes what needs to be done first when approaching the development of an article. The article you develop will be done in WP:DRAFT ↗. This is an area where you can easily work on it, undisturbed and once completed you can submit it for review by an external reviewer. If it follows follows policy correctly in format, layout, structure and so on, as well as proper referencing, it will moved to article-space where it will become a live article. You would create the article in your sandbox (a silly name but accurate) found here User:Mohamed Najah Pookkottur/sandbox and then somebody will come along and submit it into draft where you can work on it, until its ready for you, or you can create the draft article directly by filling in the dialog box field at WP:DRAFT ↗. Either way works. Hope that helps. '''scope_creepTalk''' 10:19, 30 June 2026 (UTC)
:::Thank you mentor, I thought you aren't gonna reply, it is going well btw, I will start working on it Mohamed Najah Pookkottur (talk) 06:46, 2 July 2026 (UTC)
::::{{ping|Mohamed Najah Pookkottur}} I always answer if I can understand what's been said. I see its going well. I've added a template to your talk page which gives you a whole load of links. It should help you navigate around the place. '''scope_creepTalk''' 08:59, 2 July 2026 (UTC)
::::Hi {{ping|Mohamed Najah Pookkottur}} There is a wee training video half down this article here: WP:REFB ↗ which shows you create a reference. Newspapers, magazines, dictionaries, journals, websites with editorial control, meaning they are ran by an editorial team, academic sites are good places to get references. Social media sites, listing sites like IMDB discogs, forums, blogs and press-releases sites are bad place to use for references. Avoid them like the plague. '''scope_creepTalk''' 09:39, 2 July 2026 (UTC)

Question by N198UA ↗ (June 30, 2026, 14:37 CST)

If a create an article that was deleted because it was created by a banned or block user that is unrelated to me. Am I breaking any rules (I don’t want to make another mistake because I moved a Wikipedia article (The person who told me to look at WP:RUU ↗ said that it wasn’t clear)? - N198UA (talk) 19:39, 30 June 2026 (UTC)
::Hi {{ping|N198UA}} If you are a new editor who has came in to recreate an article that was deleted because it was created by a banned or block user, then it tends to be the assumption that you are the banned or blocked editor, or related somehow to that editor (See WP:COI ↗) and its viewed in that manner. I see you are a new editor. I see what looks like two articles in your user space that you have written. As they stand, those two article aren't fit for article-space on Wikipedia and I will likely send them to WP:AFD ↗ if they are moved to article-space, where there will be a discussion on whether to delete them. They will get deleted as they appear to be merely event listings without encyclopaedic merit. They seem to be entirely routine in nature. Wikipedia is not a listing site for spurious or routine content. We are not an almanac. New editors generally go through the WP:DRAFT ↗ process. This is an area where articles can be worked on at your leisure, then get reviewed by an independent reviewer to ensure they are to up to standard and if they are, they can be moved to article-space.

::It's the general case that articles can be recreated and they do all the time, but they must follow the rules. The banned or blocked editor has usually created it in a manner that breaks some part of policy, like e.g. no or bad references, its promotional, or badly written, WP:NPOV ↗, WP:TNT ↗, non-notable, an attack article, or perhaps a hoax and so on. There are several to many reasons why it would get deleted and the editor removed. But it could be a notable subject, so its recreated by somebody who is capable of writing it properly. '''scope_creepTalk''' 05:06, 1 July 2026 (UTC)
:::Okay. So, not a good idea to recreate that article.
::: I found a second deleted page (Not sure if it is related, there no user listed by it was mentioned to have been created by a banned or blocked user (Pages are Northern Thunderbird Air Flight 204 ↗, which was made by a banned/blocked user named “TyHaliburtn” (IDK how to link to their user), and Summit Air Flight 802D ↗ (I don’t know who the article creator for that article is). The reasons for the pages on my article is because my user is because my user is based on the Boeing 747-422 that was N198UA. The other article was the article that I mentioned that I accidentally moved after getting confused by WP: RUU and later I hopefully did it correctly (The article was deleted but I tried to put the revision that I put on my article) and I put it on my page since I added most of the info at the time of when I moved it to my page. I am not intending to move them to the article space.
:::I do apologize for any confusion that has made you think that I am a banned/blocked user. - N198UA (talk) 18:51, 1 July 2026 (UTC)
::::Hi {{ping|N198UA}} No, I don't think your a banned or blocked user. There is a general assumption that if somebody comes in quite quickly after an article is deleted, then its some group working on it, and they need it to be created. I think your in earnest. Oh, right. I never realised. You can ask for the article that was deleted to be WP:REFUND ↗ed. I think you can if its a blocked editor that created it. Once its refunded by an administrator, its put in WP:DRAFT ↗. Might be worth a go. If you can't get it back and you think its definitely notable, recreate it. I would suggest doing in draft. '''scope_creepTalk''' 09:18, 2 July 2026 (UTC)
:::::Okay. Thank you. - N198UA (talk) 17:08, 2 July 2026 (UTC)

Question from We Live Together By God's Grace (19:41, 3 July 2026)

"Would you like to share a brief message or words of encouragement for the beneficiary?" --We Live Together By God's Grace (talk) 19:41, 3 July 2026 (UTC)

You're invited to the Mentorship noticeboard

Hi, Scope creep. You are cordially invited to the brand new Wikipedia:Mentorship noticeboard ↗. I get the impression sometimes that we mentors are each toiling in our own cubbyhole or hamster wheel, quietly answering mentee questions with little to no interaction with other mentors. I think we have a lot to share and learn from each other, and I know it will make me feel better just having the opportunity to interact with you and other mentors there, and I hope it will for you, too. Looking forward to hearing your feedback. Please take the {{slink|WP:MNB|Survey|nopage=yes}} when you get there! (P.S., haven't heard a peep out of E. for quite some time; have you?) Mathglot (talk) 00:43, 5 July 2026 (UTC)

Regarding Draft:Smalt

Hi. I'm a bit skeptical of your reasons for moving the page Smalt ↗ into draftspace following a major edit by TAHPaul ↗. Your provided reasons were: "Reason/s: no sources, machine-generated".

I have not talked to & do not know TAHPaul. That said, TAHPaul's contribution history shows that his(?) first edit was the creation of Technical art history ↗ via AFC ↗. This page creation occurred in April 2020, before the widespread availability of LLMs, measured 20,690 bytes and contained numerous references and external links. Ergo, I would argue that writing a long article out of the blue -- without the use of any LLM -- is within this user's capabilities.

In regards to sources: The edit by TAHPaul provided '''at least 20 new references''', along with citation notes, mentions of the authors in-text, and a subsection regarding the documentation of smalt production. I do acknowledge that there are no citations in the introduction, and the first citation appears near the end of the first section, giving it the appearance of no sources at a glance. Later sections with more technical details are rather thoroughly cited. I have checked, and every referenced book/article/etc. exists, though some are not digitally available.

Searching the internet for "technical art history Paul" and "Paul smalt research" both lead me to a technical art historian named Paul whose work as a PhD student and museum research associate includes a focus on smalt. I figure that someone who has been researching smalt and related pigments for several years probably knows more than an LLM.

If there are other aspects of the Smalt article that need improvement, I'm eager to help where I can.

Astronomyfortwo (talk) 04:01, 5 July 2026 (UTC)
::Hi {{ping|Astronomyfortwo}} How goes it? I see what you mean. I found him relatively easy. I originally moved it to draft because it looked suspicious. Here is a 43k article that appeared out the blue with no on-Wikipedia development. Normally such an article would take at least a couple of months if it was researched from a standing start. So it either had to be an expert, a specialist in the field that wrote it, or a LLM. I felt it was LLM written as it hadn't had the normal on-wikipedia development period and looked and read in parts that look like LLM. Certainly, I know there is plenty of off-wiki editing tools that could be used to write it. Regarding the draft, I was looking for a second point of view. The fact you have checked the references provides me with some level of confidence that is factually correct. I think, certainly if you think if is within the editors capability to write this and you think its OK, then I would move it back to main-space. '''scope_creepTalk''' 15:42, 5 July 2026 (UTC)

Question from FinnElGhifari-78e on Inderprastha Dental College ↗ (14:08, 9 July 2026)

How do I create a citation? --FinnElGhifari-78e (talk) 14:08, 9 July 2026 (UTC)
::Hi {{ping|FinnElGhifari-78e}} Assuming your using the source editor, then please take a look at WP:REFB ↗. Half way down is a wee video on the right that is a tutorial on how to do it. You will see at the top of the editor window is a cite button. When you click on templates, it gives four choices - cite web, cite news, cite book and cite journal, which are the most common types. Some of the dialogue form are active, where you can put a value and it will do a lookup and attempt the fill the form for you. If your using the visual editor, take a look at these how-to's WP:VEREFB ↗ and WP:INTREFVE ↗. When you create the references, fill as many fields as you can. Hope that helps. I'm here most days if you need to ask any questions or need help on something. '''scope_creepTalk''' 16:14, 9 July 2026 (UTC)
::{{ping|FinnElGhifari-78e}} I've sent that article Inderprastha Dental College ↗ to WP:AFD ↗. That is an area where it discussed to determine if its worth keeping. I sent there because it has no sources. I guess that is the reason you were asking about source. Generally you need 3 sources to show its notable per WP:THREE ↗ It's really a test to show its notable. . If you provide those three sources, I can add them for you. '''scope_creepTalk''' 16:58, 9 July 2026 (UTC)