User Talk: Shivertimbers433

Server-side rendered snapshot of this editor's Wikipedia talk page discussions.

Welcome!

thumb|300px|Some cookies to welcome you! File:Face-smile.svg|25px ↗ ↗ Welcome to Wikipedia ↗, Shivertimbers433! Thank you for your contributions ↗. I am WereSpielChequers and I have been editing Wikipedia for some time, so if you have any questions feel free to leave me a message on my talk page. You can also check out Wikipedia:Questions ↗ or type {{tlx|helpme}} at the bottom of this page. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Introduction ↗

The five pillars of Wikipedia ↗

How to edit a page ↗

Help pages ↗

How to write a great article ↗

Also, when you post on talk pages ↗ you should sign your name ↗ using four tildes (<nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>); that will automatically produce your username and the date. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian ↗! ''<span style="color:DarkGreen">Ϣere</span><span style="color:DarkRed">Spiel</span><span style="color:#CC5500">Chequers</span>'' 22:15, 8 April 2012 (UTC)

January 2013

25px|alt=|link= ↗ Hello, I'm Tbhotch. I noticed that you made an edit to a biography of a living person, :List of gay, lesbian or bisexual people: F ↗, but that you didn’t support your changes with a citation to a reliable source ↗. Wikipedia has a strict policy concerning how we write about living people ↗, so please help us keep such articles accurate. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page ↗. Thank you.  <span style="color:#4B0082;">Tb</span><span style="color:#6082B6;">hotch</span>.<sup><span style="color:#6B8E23;"><big>™</big></span></sup> Grammatically incorrect? '''Correct it!''' <u>See terms and conditions.</u> 22:00, 16 January 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 3

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Best-selling albums in the United States since Nielsen SoundScan tracking began ↗, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Based on a True Story ↗ and Night Visions ↗ (check to confirm ↗ | fix with Dab solver ↗). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. <small>Read the FAQ{{*}} Join us at the DPL WikiProject ↗.</small>

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:08, 3 January 2014 (UTC)

Reference Errors on 13 January

25px|alt=|link= ↗ Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have '''automatically detected''' that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. {{#ifeq:1|1|It is|They are}} as follows:

On the Roxann Dawson ↗ page, [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=590577031 your edit] caused a broken reference name ↗ <small>(help ↗)</small>. ([{{fullurl:Roxann Dawson|action=edit&minor=minor&summary=Fixing+reference+error+raised+by+%5B%5BUser%3AReferenceBot%7CReferenceBot%5D%5D}} Fix] | [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&preload=User:ReferenceBot/helpform&preloadtitle=Referencing%20errors%20on%20%5B%0A%0A%2F%2Fen.wikipedia.org%2Fw%2Findex.php%3Fdiff%3D590577031%20{{Replace|Roxann Dawson| |%20}}%5D Ask for help])

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive ↗, you can [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/RBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/RBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=ReferenceBot%20–%20{{subst</noinclude>:REVISIONUSER}}&section=new report it to my operator].
Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:31, 14 January 2014 (UTC)

New RfC on Talk:List of African-American Academy Award winners and nominees

I have just posted a new RfC on Talk:List of African-American Academy Award winners and nominees ↗. Given your previous involvement in the discussion of a related RfC there, you might want to comment on mine. 99.192.66.175 ↗ (talk) 14:36, 18 March 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 25

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of Kathy Griffin stand-up specials ↗, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The View ↗ (check to confirm ↗ | fix with Dab solver ↗). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. <small>Read the FAQ{{*}} Join us at the DPL WikiProject ↗.</small>

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:58, 25 March 2014 (UTC)

Kathy Griffin

Nice job on the List of Kathy Griffin stand-up specials ↗ page! Looks amazing with the tables Oath2order (talk) 21:57, 26 March 2014 (UTC)
:Thanks!--Shivertimbers433 (talk) 19:08, 28 March 2014 (UTC)

List

Hi Shivertimbers433. As noted in the 21 April general notice ↗ I posted on the page, I've started a formal move review ↗ of the RfC. Best regards, Middayexpress (talk) 19:32, 28 April 2014 (UTC)

Catregories for discussion

I have closed the discussion at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2014 July 10 ↗ with no outcome on :Category:Digital movie cameras ↗ and :Category:Camcorder films ↗, as you had not tagged the category pages. Please let me know if there is any specific part of the instructions at WP:CFD ↗ that does not work or is hard to follow. – Fayenatic '''<span style="color:#FF0000;">L</span> ↗'''ondon 14:42, 24 September 2014 (UTC)

Rachel Morrison

Hi, thanks for creating the article for Rachel Morrison ↗! Just a heads up that I expanded it a little and have nominated it here ↗ to appear on the "Did you know" section on the main page. 97198 (talk) 13:52, 11 February 2015 (UTC)

DYK for Rachel Morrison

{{tmbox
|type = notice
|image = 15px|Updated DYK query ↗
|text = On 7 March 2015 ↗, '''Did you know ↗''' was updated with a fact from the article '''''Rachel Morrison ↗''''', which you recently created or substantially expanded. The fact was ''... that ''Dope ↗'' is cinematographer '''Rachel Morrison ↗'''{{`}}s seventh film to screen at the Sundance Film Festival ↗ in six consecutive years?'' {{#if: |The nomination discussion and review may be seen at [[]].|{{#ifexist:Template:Did you know nominations/Rachel Morrison|The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Rachel Morrison ↗.|{{#ifexist:Template talk:Did you know/Rachel Morrison|The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template talk:Did you know/Rachel Morrison ↗.}} }} }} You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page <small>(here's how, live views ↗, daily totals ↗)</small>, and it may be added to the statistics page ↗ if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page ↗.
}} <small style="color:#999;white-space:nowrap;text-shadow:lightgrey 0.3em 0.3em 0.15em;">— <big style="color:#ffa439">Coffee</big> // <span style="color:#009900;">have a cup</span> ↗ // <span style="color:#4682b4;">beans</span> ↗ // </small> 23:42, 7 March 2015 (UTC)

Backup

Hi, make backups of the monster list. With in essence one contributor (=you) based on an uncommon interpretation of "what wikipedia is not" anybody else suggesting a "speedy deletion" has a high success chance, and then your work would be not more visible for non-admins. –Be..anyone (talk) 03:02, 20 April 2015 (UTC)
:Hello mate, not quite sure I understood your message. Could you elaborate more? --Shivertimbers433 (talk) 05:32, 20 April 2015 (UTC)
::I'm one of the "keep talk where it was started" folks, therefore I've copied your reply and answer here: I'm kind of worried that you create a huge referenced list alone. It's not like any other page I know, and there are rules in the direction of Wikipedia:NOTDIRECTORY ↗ against creating huge lists based on external links (the references on this page could be also considered as external links.) Maybe ask for a third opinion somewhere, because I think you put a lot of effort in the list, and I'm not confident that it won't be deleted. Allegedly (untested) the Teahouse ↗ is an extremely friendly place, and the (tested) Help desk ↗ is straight forward, if you have no better idea where to get another opinion. –Be..anyone (talk) 05:52, 20 April 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open! ↗

Hi,<br>
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election ↗. The Arbitration Committee ↗ is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process ↗. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans ↗, topic bans ↗, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy ↗ describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements ↗ and submit your choices on the voting page ↗. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:53, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 9

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Jenny Shimizu ↗, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page American ↗. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. <small>Read the FAQ{{*}} Join us at the DPL WikiProject ↗.</small>

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:44, 9 August 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016 ↗: Voting now open!

{{Ivmbox|Hello, Shivertimbers433. Voting in the '''2016 Arbitration Committee elections ↗''' is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee ↗ is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process ↗. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans ↗, topic bans ↗, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy ↗ describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements ↗ and submit your choices on '''the voting page ↗'''. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
|Scale of justice 2.svg|imagesize=40px}}

Vermont gubernatorial election, 2014

Hi Shivertimbers, in reference to your recent edit at Vermont gubernatorial election, 2014 ↗, which I support, you should be aware that two other editors felt that the Libertarian candidate should be included. Out of respect for their wishes, we should weigh in at Talk:Vermont gubernatorial election, 2014#Libertarian candidate ↗. Cheers, User:HopsonRoad 17:59, 18 December 2016 (UTC)

Hello! There is a DR/N request you may have interest in.

60px|left ↗
This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard ↗ regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult for editors. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help this dispute come to a resolution. The discussion is about the topic Talk:Vermont gubernatorial election, 2014 ↗.
Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you! User:HopsonRoad 16:32, 21 December 2016 (UTC)

Proposed deletion ↗ of 24/7 Wall St. ↗

Hello, Shivertimbers433. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, 24/7 Wall St. ↗, for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:

# Wall St.}}&action=edit edit the page ↗
# remove the text that looks like this: {{tlc|proposed deletion/dated...}}
# save the page

Also, ''be sure to explain why'' you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page ↗. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.

You can leave a note on my talk page ↗ if you have questions.

Scorpion293 (talk) 06:13, 15 January 2017 (UTC)

May 2017

30px|left|alt=|link= ↗ You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war ↗  according to the reverts you have made on :Stranger Things ↗. Users are expected to collaborate ↗ with others, to avoid editing disruptively ↗, and to try to reach a consensus ↗ rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.<br>
Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring ↗ states:
# '''Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made'''.
# '''Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.'''
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page ↗ to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus ↗ among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard ↗ or seek dispute resolution ↗. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection ↗. If you engage in an edit war, you '''may be blocked ↗ from editing.''' -- '''<span style="color:#1632E0;text-shadow:1px 1px 8px #324A6E;">Alex</span>'''''<sup><span style="color:#1632E0">TW</span></sup>'' 04:54, 26 May 2017 (UTC)

Video formats

Per the instructions for {{tl|Infobox television}}, the <code>picture_format</code> field should be "the video or film format in which the show is or was originally recorded or broadcast". Aspect ratios are not a video format. This is not understood by many editors, which is why they are improperly included in some infoboxes. If you find these, you should remove them, rather than conform to an incorrect practice. Please note that the instructions also say not to use SDTV ↗ as it is ambiguous. --'''<span style="color:#008751;">Aussie</span><span style="color:#fcd116;">Legend</span>''' (<big>✉</big>) 19:04, 13 June 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

{{Ivmbox|Hello, Shivertimbers433. Voting in the '''2017 Arbitration Committee elections ↗''' is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee ↗ is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process ↗. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans ↗, topic bans ↗, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy ↗ describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates ↗ and submit your choices on the '''voting page ↗'''. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
|Scale of justice 2.svg|imagesize=40px}}

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

{{Ivmbox|Hello, Shivertimbers433. Voting in the '''2018 Arbitration Committee elections ↗''' is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee ↗ is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process ↗. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans ↗, topic bans ↗, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy ↗ describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates ↗ and submit your choices on the '''voting page ↗'''. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
|Scale of justice 2.svg|imagesize=40px}}

Disambiguation link notification for February 13

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited The Sarah Silverman Program ↗, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page High definition ↗ ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/The_Sarah_Silverman_Program check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/The_Sarah_Silverman_Program?client=notify fix with Dab solver]). Such links are usually incorrect ↗, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. <small>(Read the FAQ{{*}} Join us at the DPL WikiProject ↗.)</small>

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:43, 13 February 2019 (UTC)

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

<table class="messagebox " style="border: 1px solid #AAA; background: ivory; padding: 0.5em; width: 100%;">
<tr><td style="vertical-align:middle; padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em;">40px ↗</td><td>Hello! Voting in the '''2019 Arbitration Committee elections ↗''' is now open until 23:59 on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2019|end}}-1 day}}. All '''eligible users ↗''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee ↗ is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process ↗. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans ↗, topic bans ↗, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy ↗ describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates ↗ and submit your choices on the '''2019|poll}}|voting page ↗'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:15, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
</td></tr>
</table>

Discretionary sanctions on Jeff Van Drew ↗

{{ivmbox | image = Commons-emblem-notice.svg |imagesize=50px | bg = #E5F8FF | text = This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. ''It does '''not''' imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.''

You have shown interest in post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions ↗ is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions ↗ on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies ↗, or the page-specific restrictions ↗, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions ↗ and the Arbitration Committee's ↗ decision here ↗. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
}} DES <sup>(talk)</sup><sub>DESiegel Contribs</sub> ↗ 02:42, 15 December 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 11

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Buffalo '66 ↗, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Dick Pope ↗ ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Buffalo_%2766 check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Buffalo_%2766?client=notify fix with Dab solver]). Such links are usually incorrect ↗, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. <small>(Read the FAQ{{*}} Join us at the DPL WikiProject ↗.)</small>

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 16:18, 11 February 2020 (UTC)

Mac Mini (PowerPC-based) ↗

I don't know what you were going for, but that content was copied from Mac Mini ↗. See Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia ↗. Drmies (talk) 01:02, 23 June 2020 (UTC)

August 2020

25px|alt=Information icon ↗ Hello, I'm Toddst1. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living (or recently deceased) person{{spaces|1}}on :Rory Kennedy ↗, but you didn't support your changes with a citation to a reliable source ↗, so I removed it. Wikipedia has a very strict policy concerning how we write about living people ↗, so please help us keep such articles accurate and clear. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page ↗. ''See WP:BURDEN ↗.''  Toddst1 <small>(talk)</small> 13:52, 26 August 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 16

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited HomePod Mini ↗, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page UWB ↗.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:14, 16 October 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

<table class="messagebox " style="border: 1px solid #AAA; background: ivory; padding: 0.5em; width: 100%;">
<tr><td style="vertical-align:middle; padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em;">40px ↗</td><td>Hello! Voting in the '''2020 Arbitration Committee elections ↗''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2020|end}}-1 day}}. All '''eligible users ↗''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee ↗ is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process ↗. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans ↗, topic bans ↗, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy ↗ describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates ↗ and submit your choices on the '''2020|poll}}|voting page ↗'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:29, 24 November 2020 (UTC)
</td></tr>
</table>

December 2020

25px|alt=Information icon|link= ↗ Hello. I have noticed that you often edit without using an edit summary ↗. Please do your best to '''always fill in the summary field'''. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. Thanks!  ― <span style="color:#990000">'''''Tartan357'''''</span> <sup><span style="color:#224434">'''Talk'''</span></sup> 01:10, 6 December 2020 (UTC)

25px|alt=Information icon ↗ Please do not add original research ↗ or novel syntheses ↗ of published material to articles as you apparently did to :2020 United States Senate election in Arkansas ↗. Please cite a reliable source ↗ for all of your contributions. Thank you. ― <span style="color:#990000">'''''Tartan357'''''</span> <sup><span style="color:#224434">'''Talk'''</span></sup> 01:11, 6 December 2020 (UTC)

Your vote on Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MacBook Air (M1) ↗

Hi, we do not yet have consensus about whether to delete the article MacBook Air (M1) ↗.
Since you're a very large contributor to the MacBook pages, I'd like to invite you to take part in the discussion on the deletion: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MacBook Air (M1) ↗. Thank you! Andibrema (talk) 00:14, 9 February 2021 (UTC)

It's corporate-owned, not corporately-owned

Just noticed this edit ↗ on 17 March 2021.

The correct usage is corporate-owned, not corporately-owned. It's quite clear which one is the correct usage and which is the typo if you look at Google Ngram Viewer ↗. --Coolcaesar (talk) 05:15, 23 March 2021 (UTC)

2016 United States presidential election in Vermont: Infobox inclusion of Sanders

Hi Shivertimbers, I concurred with your observation at Talk:2016 United States presidential election in Vermont#Should Sanders be in infobox? ↗ that probably Sanders shouldn't be included in the infobox. However, we have a new editor, who has declined the suggestion that such inclusion be based on consensus and has reverted my removal twice ↗. Perhaps, you could re-engage to help build consensus. Cheers, HopsonRoad (talk) 13:55, 1 June 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion ↗ nomination of :Frame.io ↗

48px|left|alt=|link= ↗
{{Quote box|quote=<p>If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article ↗.</p><p>You may want to consider using the Article Wizard ↗ to help you create articles.</p>|width=20%|align=right}}
A tag has been placed on :Frame.io ↗ requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion ↗, because the article appears to be about a company, corporation or organization that does not credibly indicate ↗ how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion ↗, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable ↗.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may '''contest the nomination''' by visiting the page ↗ and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines ↗. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the {{Querylink|Special:Log|qs=type=delete&page=Frame.io|deleting administrator}}.  Htanaungg (talk) 07:01, 1 November 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

<table class="messagebox " style="border: 1px solid #AAA; background: ivory; padding: 0.5em; width: 100%;">
<tr><td style="vertical-align:middle; padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em;">40px ↗</td><td>Hello! Voting in the '''2021 Arbitration Committee elections ↗''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2021|end}}-1 day}}. All '''eligible users ↗''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee ↗ is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process ↗. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans ↗, topic bans ↗, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy ↗ describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates ↗ and submit your choices on the '''2021|poll}}|voting page ↗'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. <small>MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:34, 23 November 2021 (UTC)</small>
</td></tr>
</table>

thank you for the edits on apple studio display

I noticed you went and updated all articles mentioning it, nice job Editor8778 (talk) 00:18, 9 March 2022 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Shivertimbers433

Thank you for creating Apple Studio Display ↗.

User:FormalDude, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process ↗, had the following comments:

{{Bq|1=Needs additional sources for notability ↗.}}

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{code|<nowiki>{{Re|</nowiki>FormalDude<nowiki>}}</nowiki>}}. Please remember to sign your reply with {{code|<nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>}} .

<small>(Message delivered via the Page Curation ↗ tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)</small>

––<span style="color: #0151D2">''FormalDude''</span> <span style="border-radius:7em;padding:2.5px 3.5px;background:#005bed;font-size:76%"><span style="color:#FFF">'''talk'''</span></span> 04:34, 9 March 2022 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 26

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of The Simpsons Treehouse of Horror episodes ↗, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page I Am Legend ↗.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:15, 26 July 2022 (UTC)

I Know What You Did Last Summer

Please note that Blu-ray.com is not considered a reliable source ↗ as discussed here ↗, and as such should not be used in citations. Cheers! DonIago (talk) 16:55, 11 October 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

<div class="ivmbox " style="margin-bottom: 1em; border: 1px solid #AAA; background-color: ivory; padding: 0.5em; display: flex; align-items: center; ">
<div class="ivmbox-image" style="padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em; flex: 1 0 40px;">40px ↗</div>
<div class="ivmbox-text">
Hello! Voting in the '''2022 Arbitration Committee elections ↗''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2022|end}}-1 day}}. All '''eligible users ↗''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee ↗ is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process ↗. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans ↗, topic bans ↗, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy ↗ describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates ↗ and submit your choices on the '''2022|poll}}|voting page ↗'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. <small>MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:08, 29 November 2022 (UTC)</small>

</div>
</div>

Charles III requested move discussion

There is a new requested move discussion ↗ in progress for the Charles III article. Since you participated in the previous discussion, I thought you might like to know about this one. Cheers. Rreagan007 (talk) 06:06, 24 July 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

<div class="ivmbox " style="margin-bottom: 1em; border: 1px solid #AAA; background-color: ivory; padding: 0.5em; display: flex; align-items: center; ">
<div class="ivmbox-image" style="padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em; flex: 1 0 40px; max-width: 100px">40px ↗</div>
<div class="ivmbox-text">
Hello! Voting in the '''2023 Arbitration Committee elections ↗''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2023|end}}-1 day}}. All '''eligible users ↗''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee ↗ is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process ↗. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans ↗, topic bans ↗, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy ↗ describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates ↗ and submit your choices on the '''2023|poll}}|voting page ↗'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. <small>MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:41, 28 November 2023 (UTC)</small>

</div>
</div>

The Crown - Engvar

Hi - just a polite reminder that the articles on The Crown TV series are in British English; editing to change spellings or punctuation from one Engvar to another is deprecated. Kind regards, MapReader (talk) 07:25, 19 December 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

<div class="ivmbox " style="margin-bottom: 1em; border: 1px solid #a2a9b1; background-color: #fdf2d5; padding: 0.5em; display: flex; align-items: center; ">
<div class="ivmbox-image noresize" style="padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em;">40px ↗</div>
<div class="ivmbox-text">
Hello! Voting in the '''2024 Arbitration Committee elections ↗''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2024|end}}-1 day}}. All '''eligible users ↗''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee ↗ is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process ↗. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans ↗, topic bans ↗, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy ↗ describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates ↗ and submit your choices on the '''2024|poll}}|voting page ↗'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. <small>MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:30, 19 November 2024 (UTC)</small>

</div>
</div>

A cup of tea for you!

{| style="background-color: var(--background-color-success-subtle, #fdffe7); border: 1px solid var(--border-color-success, #fceb92); color: var(--color-base, #202122);"
|style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 5px;" | 120px ↗
|style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;" | Thank you sincerely for your contributions! :) <span style="font-family: century gothic;">'''x'''<u> RozuRozu </u> • ''<sup>'''t'''ea</sup><sub>'''c'''ups</sub> ↗''</span> 17:46, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
|}

Robert Sarvis & the 2014 US Senate Election in Virginia

If you will read the talk section regarding this article you will find that "Result: Robert Sarvis should be included in the infobox.

"Two editors felt that Sarvis should be excluded from the infobox and five felt that he should be included. One editor appeared to be neutral/leaning exclude. Since there doesn't appear to be any clear dividing line between where a candidate should be included in an infobox and where they shouldn't (given that not all elections are alike, perhaps it is right that there should be no clear dividing line), I don't see what else can be done here except to go with the majority.

"It was claimed during the discussion that there is an existing consensus that candidates must get 5% or more in at least two opinion polls to qualify for the infobox, but I have not been able to find any evidence of this. If evidence is presented after the close, then I may be willing to take it into account."

VirginiaPolitics (talk) 18:16, 27 July 2025 (UTC)

:Consensuses based on pre-election polling are no longer in effect once the election takes place and the actual balloting is known. Since he didn't reach 5% in the actual results, he's doesn't qualify for the infobox anymore. See Wikipedia:Five percent rule ↗ and Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Elections_and_Referendums/Archive_12#RfC_on_5%_threshold ↗. There was a consensus to include Gary Johnson ↗ in the 2016 United States presidential election ↗ infobox before it took place because he polled 5%, and he was removed after the fact because he didn't reach that in actual results. -- Shivertimbers433 (talk) 17:20, 27 July 2025 (UTC)

There is no harm in including Sarvis in the election box and it is important given that it is quite rare for minor party and independent candidates to make the statewide ballot in Virginia. Deleting him is a way of silencing those who voted for him, much like the debate organizers did repeated to Sarvis during the election. Is there some reason why you feel it is necessary to delete him? Does including him offend you somehow? I'd rather not keep fighting you on this issue, but without a solid rational reason to exclude him, beside some arbitrary 5% threshold, I'll keep re-adding Sarvis into the graphic no matter how many times you delete him.

:The 5% threshold for infobox inclusion is based on established consensus among editors as a reasonable objective standard for significant electoral support. Since multiple editors have reverted you in line with that guideline, repeatedly re-adding him without broader agreement risks violating Wikipedia’s policies on consensus and edit warring. -Shivertimbers433 (talk) 04:08, 28 July 2025 (UTC)

Question about Rover

Hi, Shivertimbers433. I was looking through the Rover article's edit history and I see that made some substantial edits last year. I'm a Rover rep and I'm trying to address the "promotional content" banner by cleaning up the article and possibly deleting the finance section entirely. Could you look at the request I put together ↗? Any feedback would be greatly appreciated. RoverDM (talk) 15:37, 25 September 2025 (UTC)

Disciple of Saturn

{| style="background-color: var(--background-color-success-subtle, #fdffe7); border: 1px solid var(--border-color-success, #fceb92); color: var(--color-base, #202122);"
|rowspan="2" style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 5px;" | 100px ↗
|style="font-size: x-large; padding: 3px 3px 0 3px; height: 1.5em;" | '''Bishop of Saturn'''
|-
|style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;" | Thank you for your work on the GM EV1 page! Your work towards the preservation of Saturn and Saturn-adjacent history is much appreciated :) TheSaturnLover (talk) 06:42, 25 October 2025 (UTC)
|}

Pending changes

right|130px ↗
Hello again. I don't know if any of the pages you watch are under pending changes yet, but if there aren't any I suspect it is just a matter of time. So I have set your account as a "{{mono|pending changes reviewer}}", allowing you to review other users' edits ↗ on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges ↗, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages ↗.

Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.

''See also:''

Wikipedia:Reviewing pending changes ↗, the guideline on reviewing

Wikipedia:Reviewing pending changes#Requirements to accept an edit ↗, when to accept an edit <br>

If you would also like WP:Rollback ↗, just read the policy and tell me when you would and wouldn't use it.
''<span style="color:DarkGreen">Ϣere</span><span style="color:DarkRed">Spiel</span><span style="color:#CC5500">Chequers</span>'' 17:57, 25 October 2025 (UTC)

Proposed deletion ↗ of :File:Book jacket of 107 Days.jpg ↗

left|link=|alt=Notice|48px| ↗

The file :File:Book jacket of 107 Days.jpg ↗ has been proposed for deletion ↗ because of the following concern:
<blockquote>'''redundant to :File:107 Days Kamala Harris.jpg ↗'''</blockquote>

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons ↗.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary ↗ or on the file's talk page ↗.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process ↗, but other deletion process ↗es exist. In particular, the speedy deletion ↗ process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion ↗ allows discussion to reach consensus ↗ for deletion. —'''Matrix''' <sub>ping ↗ me</sub><sup>when u reply</sup> (t? - <sub></sub>c ↗) 21:49, 4 November 2025 (UTC)

ArbCom 2025 Elections voter message

<div class="ivmbox " style="margin-bottom: 1em; border: 1px solid #a2a9b1; background-color: #fdf2d5; padding: 0.5em; display: flex; align-items: center; ">
<div class="ivmbox-image" style="padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em;flex-basis: 40px">40px ↗</div>
<div class="ivmbox-text">
Hello! Voting in the '''2025 Arbitration Committee elections ↗''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2025|end}}-1 day}}. All '''eligible users ↗''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee ↗ is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process ↗. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans ↗, topic bans ↗, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy ↗ describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please review the candidates ↗ and submit your choices on the '''2025|poll}}|voting page ↗'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. <small>MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:36, 18 November 2025 (UTC)</small>

</div>
</div>

DYK for MacBook Neo

{{ivmbox
|image = Updated DYK query.svg
|imagesize=40px
|image class=skin-invert
|text = On 2 April 2026 ↗, '''Did you know ↗''' was updated with a fact from the article '''''MacBook Neo ↗''''', which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ''... that the '''MacBook Neo ↗''' uses a processor found in iPhones?'' The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/MacBook Neo ↗. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page <small>(here's how, MacBook Neo ↗)</small>, and the hook may be added to the statistics page ↗ after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to nominate it ↗.
}} <span style="background-color:#ffd98c; color:black">'''Hurricane'''</span><span style="background-color:#ffd98c; color:black">'''Zeta'''</span><sup>C ↗</sup> 00:02, 2 April 2026 (UTC)