User Talk: Shoshin000

Server-side rendered snapshot of this editor's Wikipedia talk page discussions.

Always sign your posts ↗ on talk pages. You can do this either by clicking on the 22px|link=Wikipedia:Signatures ↗ button on the edit toolbar ↗ or by typing four tilde ↗s <code><nowiki>~~~~</nowiki></code> at the end of your post. This will automatically insert your signature ↗, a link to your talk page, and a timestamp ↗.

Leave descriptive edit summaries ↗ for your edits. Doing so helps other editors understand what changes you have made and why you made them.<br/>

The best way to learn about something is to experience it. Explore, learn, contribute, and don't forget to have some fun! ↗</div>

<div style="border:1px solid #aae1ff;padding:5px;background-color:#f3f3f3;text-align:center;border-radius:0 0 10px 10px;">
{{hlist|style=font-size:90%;
|{{lang|es|Español ↗|italic=no}}
|{{lang|de|Deutsch ↗|italic=no}}
|{{lang|fr|Français ↗|italic=no}}
|{{lang|it|Italiano ↗|italic=no}}
|{{lang|he|עברית ↗|italic=no}}
|{{lang|ru|Русский ↗|italic=no}}
|{{lang|ja|日本語 ↗|italic=no}}
|{{lang|pl|Polski ↗|italic=no}}
|{{lang|fa|فارسی ↗|italic=no}}}}
Sincerely, Jax 0677 (talk) <span class="plainlinks" style="font-size:.9em">[//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Jax_0677&action=edit&section=new&preload=Template:Welcome_to_Wikipedia/user-talk_preload (Leave me a message)]</span> 21:46, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
</div>

Extended confirmed restrictions

Hello,

Please be aware that all articles related to politics, ethnic relations, and conflicts involving Armenia ↗, Azerbaijan ↗, or both—broadly construed and explicitly including the Armenian genocide ↗—are subject to an extended confirmed restriction ↗. KhndzorUtogh (talk) 21:27, 14 May 2024 (UTC)

:Thank you for notifying me, but where does this policy oblige you to revert my edits as if I'm a pest? Here ↗ I read ''{{tq| Enforcement of the restriction on articles primarily in the topic area is preferably done with extended confirmed protection, but it's not required (other enforcement methods are outlined in the policy). As always, review the policy before enforcing it.}}'' I control-F'ed the string "revert" and it returned 0 results. What exactly prompted you to apply this rule this harshly? Shoshin000 (talk) 07:41, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
:Such a harsh application of this rule is unnecessary, I am open to dialogue. On the other hand, are you? Shoshin000 (talk) 07:44, 15 May 2024 (UTC)

June 2024

25px|alt=Information icon ↗ Hello, I'm Zsohl. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions ↗—specifically <span class="plainlinks">this edit ↗</span> to :Monsieur Ibrahim ↗—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox ↗. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse ↗ or the Help desk ↗. Thanks. <span style="font-family:'Trebuchet MS'; color:#217d00;font-size:110%">'''Z'''sohl</span><sup style="font-family:Trebuchet MS; color:#9971DA;font-size:10px">'''''(Talk)'''''</sup> 08:31, 23 June 2024 (UTC)

:Hi, I've read WP:SPOILER ↗ and I understood that it is acceptable to put the ending in a separate section to prevent spoilers. Shoshin000 (talk) 08:32, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
::The article just says that sections like "Plot" or "Ending" imply spoilers, not that they should have a spoiler warning. I also just don't see the point in having a separate section for such a short summary. Harryhenry1 (talk) 10:07, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
:::You gotta understand: I was frustrated by the final sentence spoiling the whole thing :) Shoshin000 (talk) 11:00, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
::::I understand feeling frustrated (since the summary's so short it's hard to not look at it) but in the future it's better to not do that kind of editing out of frustration. Harryhenry1 (talk) 11:02, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
:::::Yet I haven't violated the guidelines afaik? Shoshin000 (talk) 11:03, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
::::::You did, since the Spoiler article specifically says not to add a spoiler warning notice like your edit did. Harryhenry1 (talk) 11:08, 23 June 2024 (UTC)

August 2024

25px|alt=|link= ↗ Hello, I'm रोहित साव27. An edit you recently made to :History of prostitution ↗ seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want more practice editing, the sandbox ↗ is the best place to do so. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. <span style="text-shadow:gray 3px 3px 2px;color: black">'''रोहित'''</span> ↗<sup><span style="text-shadow:gray 3px 3px 2px;color: black">'''Talk_with_me'''</span></sup> 10:59, 9 August 2024 (UTC)

:I don't understand why you removed the image? Shoshin000 (talk) 12:01, 9 August 2024 (UTC)

25px|alt=Information icon ↗ Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, such as those you made to :Iran–Iraq War ↗, even if you intend to fix them later. Your edits have been reverted ↗. If you would like to experiment again, please use your sandbox. Thank you. Skitash (talk) 13:21, 25 August 2024 (UTC)

Introduction to contentious topics

{{ivmbox | image = Commons-emblem-notice.svg |imagesize=50px | bg = #E5F8FF | text = You have recently edited a page related to '''the Arab–Israeli conflict ↗''', a topic designated as '''contentious ↗'''. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and <em>does <strong>not</strong> imply that there are any issues with your editing</em>.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as ''contentious topics''. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit <strong>carefully</strong> and <strong>constructively</strong>, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;

comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;

follow editorial and behavioural best practice;

comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and

refrain from gaming the system.

<p>Additionally, you must be logged-in, have 500 edits and an account age of 30 days ↗, and are not allowed to make more than 1 revert within 24 hours on a page within this topic.</p><p>Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics ''procedures'' you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard ↗ or you may learn more about this contentious topic here ↗. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{tl|Ctopics/aware}} template. </p>}} Selfstudier (talk) 10:27, 20 August 2024 (UTC)

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

<div class="ivmbox " style="margin-bottom: 1em; border: 1px solid #a2a9b1; background-color: #fdf2d5; padding: 0.5em; display: flex; align-items: center; ">
<div class="ivmbox-image noresize" style="padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em;">40px ↗</div>
<div class="ivmbox-text">
Hello! Voting in the '''2024 Arbitration Committee elections ↗''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2024|end}}-1 day}}. All '''eligible users ↗''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee ↗ is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process ↗. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans ↗, topic bans ↗, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy ↗ describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates ↗ and submit your choices on the '''2024|poll}}|voting page ↗'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. <small>MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:53, 19 November 2024 (UTC)</small>

</div>
</div>

Original Research

Hi, in your edit on Sickle cell disease ↗ you said:

{{Blockquote|text=@ Robertpedley: to be more precise. From what I've searched, In the Middle East, the prevalence is very low in places like Lebanon or Syria, but much higher in Bahrain, Kuwait, Qatar, the Basra region in Iraq etc. In Europe, the only region I've found in which it is particularly common among the native population is Sicily. Everywhere else (including Greece etc) it primarily affects people of foreign origin (typically sub-saharan African)}}

Please can you check the following guidelines:

# Wikipedia:No original research ↗ - it appears that you are performing your own research using primary sources ↗, rather than summarising scientific consensus in secondary source ↗<nowiki/>s
# Wikipedia:MEDDATE ↗ - sources in medicine related articles should be as up-to-date as possible.

Here are a few good secondary sources for risk factors - American Society for Hematology,<ref>{{Cite web |title=Sickle Cell Disease |url=https://www.hematology.org/education/patients/anemia/sickle-cell-disease |access-date=2025-05-28 |website=American Society for Hematology |language=en}}</ref> Johns Hopkins Medicine<ref>{{Cite web |title=Sickle Cell Disease |url=https://www.hopkinsmedicine.org/health/conditions-and-diseases/sickle-cell-disease |website=Johns Hopkins Medicine}}</ref>, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention<ref>{{Cite web |last= |date=2024-05-22 |title=Data and Statistics on Sickle Cell Disease |url=https://www.cdc.gov/sickle-cell/data/index.html |access-date=2025-05-28 |website=Centers for Disease Control and Prevention |language=en-us}}</ref>

Please revise your edit, taking into account the above guidelines.

Thank you. Bob (talk) 20:43, 28 May 2025 (UTC) Bob (talk) 20:43, 28 May 2025 (UTC)

:I don't understand how it is original research, as I just described what I've gleaned from sources? Shoshin000 (talk) 22:35, 28 May 2025 (UTC)

ArbCom 2025 Elections voter message

<div class="ivmbox " style="margin-bottom: 1em; border: 1px solid #a2a9b1; background-color: #fdf2d5; padding: 0.5em; display: flex; align-items: center; ">
<div class="ivmbox-image" style="padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em;flex-basis: 40px">40px ↗</div>
<div class="ivmbox-text">
Hello! Voting in the '''2025 Arbitration Committee elections ↗''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2025|end}}-1 day}}. All '''eligible users ↗''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee ↗ is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process ↗. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans ↗, topic bans ↗, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy ↗ describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please review the candidates ↗ and submit your choices on the '''2025|poll}}|voting page ↗'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. <small>MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:00, 18 November 2025 (UTC)</small>

</div>
</div>

Notice of Dispute resolution noticeboard discussion

62px|left ↗
This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard ↗ regarding how to format Volodymyr Zelenskyy ↗'s place of birth in the infobox. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help this dispute come to a resolution. The thread is "Volodymyr Zelenskyy ↗".
Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you! {{clear}} Thedarkknightli (talk) 17:15, 21 April 2026 (UTC)

Why the banner saying you are new?

Two years is a relatively long time. <span style="color:#070">Doug Weller</span> talk 15:43, 26 May 2026 (UTC)
: I didn't notice it was still up there. Thanks for telling me! --Shoshin000 (talk) 17:15, 26 May 2026 (UTC)