W
Active Editors
Back to Profile

User Talk: Thedarkknightli

Server-side rendered snapshot of this editor's Wikipedia talk page discussions.

{{tph}}

Mohamed Hadid ↗



Which parameter should I use instead (of nationality)? MOS:INFONAT ↗ doesn't suggest any. If we remove "nationality" without any option, that seems quite unfair? Huldra (talk) 22:14, 1 March 2025 (UTC)

:@Huldra: Well, not sure what you were trying to say in that comment, but doesn't MOS:INFONAT state, "{{tq|A {{para|citizenship}} field can be used ...}}"? Thedarkknightli (talk) 04:07, 2 March 2025 (UTC)
::No, as you can see in Mohamed Hadid ↗, his citizenship= United States, Jordan. There is ''no'' field stating his ethnicity/nationality, and what he self-defines as, namely Palestinian, after you removed it. Please suggest a solution to that problem, thanks, Huldra (talk) 20:18, 2 March 2025 (UTC)
:::How about changing the lead sentence to "... American real estate developer of Palestinian origin"? Thedarkknightli (talk) 21:04, 2 March 2025 (UTC)
:::Why can't we have that in the info-box? Some would argue that is more important that what country gives you a passport, after all, Huldra (talk) 22:10, 2 March 2025 (UTC)
::::Well, besides MOS:INFONAT, we have MOS:INFOBOXPURPOSE ↗, which states, "{{tq|... an article should remain complete with its infobox ignored. The less information that an infobox contains, the more effectively it serves its purpose, allowing readers to identify key facts at a glance.}}" Thedarkknightli (talk) 22:31, 2 March 2025 (UTC)
:::::And you just removed a major point about him from the info-box. I'm undoing. If you want to remove it, please start a RfC, Huldra (talk) 23:21, 2 March 2025 (UTC)

Infobox person



I saw this ↗ discussion you referenced and I think it makes sense to include the republic (the infobox documentation does not discourage including subdivisions; it mentions this standard format: city, administrative region, country).

This discussion seems to be focused more on the USSR and Yugoslavia etc., but I did see you also mentioned the Russian Empire. I am not sure about this, though, at least for places that were always part of Russia (say Moscow and St. Petersburg).

For example, I do not think we would generally need to write "French Fourth Republic" or "Kingdom of France" etc. (maybe there will be some exceptions but that will depend on discussion). Algeria was considered to be part of Metropolitan France, at least administratively, but of course we would be fine if we just wrote "France" for places that are still part of France. Thoughts? Mellk (talk) 11:34, 13 June 2025 (UTC)

:Hi @Mellk, thanks for noting that! I personally find disambiguation necessary in Russian Empire's case. The empire was much bigger than present-day Russia. I mean, it included a lot of present-day countries. Thedarkknightli (talk) 12:48, 14 June 2025 (UTC)
::I think it would make sense to write "Russian Empire" for places not located within present-day Russia, but I am not sure if it is necessary for places like Moscow. Mellk (talk) 12:50, 14 June 2025 (UTC)
:::No, it isn't unless for consistency within an infobox. Thedarkknightli (talk) 13:31, 14 June 2025 (UTC)

Notice of Arbitration Enforcement noticeboard discussion


Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a report involving you at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement ↗ regarding a possible violation of an Arbitration Committee ↗ decision. The thread is '''Thedarkknightli ↗'''. <!--Template:AE-notice--> Thank you. —Absolutiva 01:50, 15 July 2025 (UTC)

Greta Garbo ↗



I agree that "Swedish citizenship from 1905" (repeating the birth year) was not proper format; I have reworded the infobox accordingly. However, you are quite wrong about the rules of Swedish citizenship. While some countries do indeed forbid dual citizenship, Sweden is not one of them. Garbo never renounced her Swedish citizenship, and that citizenship did not cease when she became a naturalized U.S. citizen in 1951. It is erroneous to state, or even infer, that it ceased when it didn't. Mason.Jones (talk) 20:04, 18 August 2025 (UTC)

:Well @Mason.Jones, do you have a source for that? Per the article Swedish nationality law ↗, it was impossible for Swedish citizens to hold dual citizenship before 2001 unless they automatically acquired the other citizenship at birth. Also, I changed the descriptor to "Swedish and American" in {{diff||prev|1306054441|this edit}} not because Garbo held dual citizenship, but because she had a career that spanned her emigration (see MOS:NATIONALITY ↗). Thedarkknightli (talk) 01:41, 19 August 2025 (UTC)
::Yes, I've googled many sources about this. If they mention Garbo's citizenship at all, they confirm that she did have to relinquish her Swedish citizenship in 1951. Although it was restored with Sweden's new 2001 law (which was retroactive), that certainly doesn't cover all the decades when she was not a Swedish citizen. Your edit seems to be the most logical resolution. Mason.Jones (talk) 15:52, 19 August 2025 (UTC)

You just changed designation of GG from Swedish American actress to Swedish and American Actress.... I've been following this page for over a decade since I wrote most of the current version back then, and I want to let you know that editors have been changing her national designation around for 10 years. Inevitably, it gets changed. "Swedish American" has lasted the longest. I don't care, but you should know it will eventually get changed, so beware.Classicfilmbuff (talk) 21:20, 16 March 2026 (UTC)

CfD nomination at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2025 September 18 §&nbsp;Category:Entertainers from Aachen ↗



<div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">48px|alt=|link= ↗</div>Categories you have created have been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization ↗ guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at '''Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2025 September 18 §&nbsp;Category:Entertainers from Aachen ↗''' on the categories for discussion ↗ page.<!-- Template:Cfd mass notice--> Thank you. Kaffet i halsen (talk) 12:33, 18 September 2025 (UTC)

:Category:Swiss entertainers by canton ↗ has been nominated for merging



<div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">48px|alt=|link= ↗</div>:Category:Swiss entertainers by canton ↗ has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization ↗ guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at '''the category's entry ↗''' on the categories for discussion ↗ page.<!-- Template:Cfd-notify--> Thank you. <sup>S</sup>Mason<sub>Garrison</sub> 19:06, 28 September 2025 (UTC)

CfD nomination at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2025 October 14 §&nbsp;Category:People from Taff's Well by occupation ↗



<div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">48px|alt=|link= ↗</div>Categories you have created have been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization ↗ guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at '''Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2025 October 14 §&nbsp;Category:People from Taff's Well by occupation ↗''' on the categories for discussion ↗ page.<!-- Template:Cfd mass notice--> Thank you. Kaffet i halsen (talk) 11:26, 14 October 2025 (UTC)

ArbCom 2025 Elections voter message



<div class="ivmbox " style="margin-bottom: 1em; border: 1px solid #a2a9b1; background-color: #fdf2d5; padding: 0.5em; display: flex; align-items: center; ">
<div class="ivmbox-image" style="padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em;flex-basis: 40px">40px ↗</div>
<div class="ivmbox-text">
Hello! Voting in the '''2025 Arbitration Committee elections ↗''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2025|end}}-1 day}}. All '''eligible users ↗''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee ↗ is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process ↗. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans ↗, topic bans ↗, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy ↗ describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please review the candidates ↗ and submit your choices on the '''2025|poll}}|voting page ↗'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. <small>MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:49, 18 November 2025 (UTC)</small>

</div>
</div>
<!-- Message sent by User:Cyberpower678@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2025/Coordination/MM/06&oldid=1322758825 -->

Hany Abu-Assad article


<small>This thread was split off from #Mohamed Hadid ↗ above by Thedarkknightli (talk) 06:44, 25 December 2025 (UTC)</small>

Hi there, you made some edit to Hany Abu-Assad ↗ that are problematic because they protect unsourced anon edits not based in the sources cited & which conflict with his self-identification. I have opened a talk page section there to rectify this. Please participate to explain your edits if you seek to preserve them. Tiamut (talk) 06:39, 26 November 2025 (UTC)

: Its just you & me on the talk page & no one is responding to the blp noticeboard request. If you had not objected, I would just be bold & change the infobox bc it is clearly out of line with several policies, including wp:blp. It currently implies Hany is an Israeli-Dutch filmmaker when that is not true & not what he is notable for. Can you please explain in the talk why you are okay with this misrepresentation? Based on what policies exactly? Or else withdraw your objection to the change. Thanks Tiamut (talk) 09:05, 28 November 2025 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation ↗: Huashan Grassland murder ↗ (December 3)


<div style="border: solid 1px #FCC; background-color: var(--background-color-warning-subtle, #fdf2d5); color: inherit; padding: 0.5em 1em; margin: 1.5em; width: 90%;"> 50px|left ↗Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation ↗ has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time.<nowiki> </nowiki>The reason left by Monkeysmashingkeyboards was:

{{divbox|gray|3=Notability is there, but the article is a mess formatting-wise. Splitting into sections and removing some citations(WP:CITEKILL ↗) would be a start, and a {{T|Infobox event}} would be good, too.|}}<!--
--
--> Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit ''after they have been resolved''.
{{clear}}

<span style="color:#ff00ff">monkey</span><sub style="color:#aa22aa">smashing</sub><sup style="color:#aa66aa">keyboards</sup> (talk) 18:56, 3 December 2025 (UTC)</div><!--Template:AfC decline-->

{| style="margin: 0.4em 2em;"
|- style="vertical-align: top;"
| alt=Teahouse logo ↗
| <div style="background-color:#e1e6db; color: #393D38; padding: 1em; font-size: 1.1em; border-radius:10px;box-shadow:-2px -2px 1px #8e8a78;">Hello, '''Thedarkknightli'''!
Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the '''Articles for creation help desk ↗'''. If you have any ''other'' questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the '''Teahouse ↗''', a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! <span style="color:#ff00ff">monkey</span><sub style="color:#aa22aa">smashing</sub><sup style="color:#aa66aa">keyboards</sup> (talk) 18:56, 3 December 2025 (UTC)</div>
|}<!-- Wikipedia:Teahouse/AfC Invitation -->
Category:Wikipedians who have received a Teahouse invitation through AfC ↗

December 2025



link=|25px|alt=Information icon ↗ You have recently made edits related to the region of South Asia ↗ (India, Pakistan, Afghanistan, Sri Lanka, Bangladesh and Nepal), broadly construed, including but not limited to history, politics, ethnicity, and social groups. This is a standard message to inform you that the region of South Asia ↗ (India, Pakistan, Afghanistan, Sri Lanka, Bangladesh and Nepal), broadly construed, including but not limited to history, politics, ethnicity, and social groups is a designated contentious topic. {{pb}}Additionally, editors must be logged in, have 500 edits, and have an account age of 30 days ↗ in order to make edits related to two subtopics: (1) Indian military history, or (2) social groups, explicitly including caste associations and political parties related to India, Pakistan, Sri Lanka, Bangladesh and Nepal. {{pb}} This message <em>does <strong>not</strong> imply that there are any issues with your editing</em>. For more information about the contentious topics system, please see Wikipedia:Contentious topics ↗. <!-- Derived from Template:Contentious topics/alert --> Absolutiva 04:17, 7 December 2025 (UTC)

ANI suggestion



I'm a bit hesitant to weigh in at ANI due to past drama, but if you leave diffs to each of Croyston's previous ANI's, the time where they said they'd communicate and all the warnings since then, people will find it ''very''hard to ignore your post...

Literally lay out the history in diffs - perhaps do a timeline? Like: ANI1, ANI2, block, reply, ANI3, block...

Show a clear pattern of behaviour that's hard to ignore.

I'm happy to vote on sanctions if needed, but an admin was concerned that I was clerking on ANI so I've avoided doing too much on that noticeboard (otherwise I'd write it myself!). Blue Sonnet (talk) 08:36, 22 December 2025 (UTC)

Happy holidays!



<div style="border-style:solid; border-color:red; background-color:#fff; border-width:2px; text-align:left; padding:8px;" class="plainlinks">70px|left ↗


Blue Sonnet (talk) is wishing you Happy Holidays ↗! This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove ↗ and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user Happy Holidays ↗, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Happy New Year! <br />

''Spread the cheer by adding {{tls|Happy holidays}} to their talk page with a friendly message.''
</div> Blue Sonnet (talk) 00:48, 25 December 2025 (UTC)

Happy Humbug



Christmas? Bah Humbug ↗

Happy Humbug! Pincrete (talk) 09:34, 25 December 2025 (UTC)

Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year



thumb|none ↗ <span style="color: #3200CC;">'''Space4T'''CatHerder</span>🖖 ↗ 17:28, 25 December 2025 (UTC)

Minnie Driver Infobox Citizenships



Hey, sorry to bother you. I noticed you reverted my edit on the Minnie Driver article on her citizenships. I just want to clarify why I made that edit, it was to make it consistent with other articles about people with more than one citizenship, as they typically list the full names of the countries that person had citizenship in, not just the abbreviations; one example being Mark Carney's page, where on his infobox it lists him as having had Canadian, Irish and United Kingdom citizenship, as opposed to Canadian, Irish and UK citizenship. Obviously what you did was a good faith edit and I just want to underscore that I'm not mad about this at all, I just wanted you to know. Have a good new year! EngineerGaming9999 (talk) 00:41, 29 December 2025 (UTC)

:@EngineerGaming9999: First off, let's ignore irrelevant other stuff ↗. Second, we have MOS:VAR ↗ (which states, "{{tq|Edit warring ↗ over style, or enforcing optional style in a bot-like ↗ fashion without prior consensus, is disruptive ↗ and is never acceptable.}}") and, like {{diff||prev|1329896582|I said}}, MOS:INFOBOXPURPOSE ↗ (which states, "{{tq|... information should be presented in a short format wherever possible ...}}"). Third, writing {{para|citizenship|<nowiki>{{ubl|United Kingdom|United States (from 2017)}}</nowiki>}} instead of {{para|citizenship|<nowiki>{{ubl|UK|US (from 2017)}}</nowiki>}} ''doubles'' the parameter's length. Fourth, there's a consensus to write "US" or "U.S." instead of "United States" in {{para|birth_place}} and {{para|death_place}}, so I really don't see why we can't do the same to {{para|citizenship}}. Thedarkknightli (talk) 09:42, 29 December 2025 (UTC)
::I just want to reassure that I am absolutely not trying to edit war, but I am glad that's how you immediately seem to view my intentions as being. I would also like to point out that my precedent seems to be more relevant to the "citizenship" part of a person's infobox than yours, and that you calling it "irrelevant" without explaining why seems to be rather reductive. Either way, though, I do recognize that this is an entirely frivolous debate and even though I still believe it would make more sense to display the full names of the countries, I'm not going to revert it anymore as, like I said, I do not want an edit war, especially not over something as trivial as this. Have a good day and a happy new year! EngineerGaming9999 (talk) 19:25, 29 December 2025 (UTC)
:::OK @EngineerGaming9999, I've just {{diff||prev|1330226639|restored my edit}}.
:::{{tq|and that you calling it "irrelevant" without explaining why seems to be rather reductive}} Well, while consistency ''within'' the same article is almost always necessary per WP:MOS ↗, consistency ''between'' different articles usually isn't cuz they possibly have different ''consensus'' on the same ''issue''. Thedarkknightli (talk) 04:18, 30 December 2025 (UTC)
::::That's fair. Thank you for explaining. Sorry about the passive-aggressiveness from earlier. EngineerGaming9999 (talk) 06:27, 3 January 2026 (UTC)

Happy New Year


<small>This heading was added by Thedarkknightli (talk) 11:30, 2 January 2026 (UTC)</small>

{| style="background-color:#FFFBC4; border:5px solid #009600;"
|rowspan="2" style="vertical-align:middle; padding:4px;" | 500px ↗
|style="font-size:x-large; padding:3px 3px 0 3px; height:1.5em; text-align:center;" | '''Happy New Year ↗!'''
|-
|style="vertical-align:middle; padding:2px;" |<div class="center">{{fontcolor|green|'''''Hello Thedarkknightli:'''''}}</div><br /><br />'''Did you know ...''' that back in 1885, Wikipedia editors wrote Good Articles with axe ↗s, hammer ↗s and chisel ↗s?<br />
Thank you for your contributions to this encyclopedia using 21st century technology. I hope you don't get any unnecessary blister ↗s.<br><br><span style="font-family: Bradley Hand ITC;">'''CAPTAIN RAJU'''</span><sup>(T) ↗</sup> 15:25, 31 December 2025 (UTC)
|}
{{paragraph break}}
:<div style="float:left">''{{resize|88%|Spread the WikiLove; use {{tls|Happy New Year elves}} to send this message}}''</div>{{clear}} <span style="font-family: Bradley Hand ITC;">'''CAPTAIN RAJU'''</span><sup>(T) ↗</sup> 15:25, 31 December 2025 (UTC)
::Thank you, @CAPTAIN RAJU! Happy New Year! Regards, Thedarkknightli (talk) 11:32, 2 January 2026 (UTC)

CfD nomination at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2026 January 3 §&nbsp;Category:Female models from Bangkok ↗



<div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">48px|alt=|link= ↗</div>Categories you have created have been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization ↗ guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at '''Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2026 January 3 §&nbsp;Category:Female models from Bangkok ↗''' on the categories for discussion ↗ page.<!-- Template:Cfd mass notice--> Thank you. Kaffet i halsen (talk) 23:22, 3 January 2026 (UTC)

About the RfC



Regarding the Mannerheim RfC, a few comments: The RfC should be its own section, with <nowiki>==Title==</nowiki> instead of three ='s. The title should also be more descriptive than just '''RfC'''. There should probably be more options with three items, with either the manor or the municipality removed. Jähmefyysikko (talk) 17:02, 27 January 2026 (UTC)

:Category:American people by religion and century ↗ has been nominated for merging



<div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">48px|alt=|link= ↗</div>:Category:American people by religion and century ↗ has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization ↗ guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at '''the category's entry ↗''' on the categories for discussion ↗ page.<!-- Template:Cfd-notify--> Thank you. Mclay1 (talk) 08:24, 9 February 2026 (UTC)

Present-day countries in infoboxes



Greetings. The documentation for Template:Infobox person ↗ was recently changed to remove the mention that present-day countries should be included in the main text instead of the infobox for the birthplace. I have started a discussion and would appreciate your input: Template talk:Infobox person#Present-day countries in birthplace ↗. Mellk (talk) 07:15, 7 March 2026 (UTC)

WP:DRN



Wikipedia is not a battleground ↗ for dispute resolution noticeboard ↗ about people in lede and infoboxes, as well as contentious topics ↗. Please understand the following not to disrupt Wikipedia to illustrate a point ↗. Absolutiva 05:44, 30 April 2026 (UTC)

:@Absolutiva, could you please be specific? Thanks, Thedarkknightli (talk) 06:01, 30 April 2026 (UTC)
::Since recently you started DRN ↗ for Volodymyr Zelenskyy ↗, which is considered contentious topic ↗ (also WP:RUSUKR ↗). Other articles designated as contentious topic include Mohamed Hadid ↗, under that you previously started an DRN ↗.
::For now, please refrain the use of DRN from any contentious topic area, or you will be subjected a topic ban ↗. Absolutiva 06:14, 30 April 2026 (UTC)
:::Well @Absolutiva, I ''still'' don't get what you're talking about. TBH, I don't see how I've (recently) violated WP:BATTLEGROUND ↗ or WP:POINTY ↗, or an ''explicit'' restriction on how many contentious topic-related DRN cases I can file. Thedarkknightli (talk) 04:17, 1 May 2026 (UTC)

May 2026



link=|25px|alt=Information icon ↗ There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents ↗ regarding an issue with which you may have been involved.&nbsp;The thread is Misuse of infoboxes by Thedarkknightli ↗.<!--Template:Discussion notice--><!--Template:ANI-notice--> Absolutiva 06:09, 2 May 2026 (UTC)

Source



https://www.imdb.com/name/nm0000030/quotes/ "I never think of myself as an icon. What is in other people's minds is not in my mind. I just do my thing." - Audrey Hepburn. There's also a video of her saying that. --DoveTheEditor (talk) 20:35, 16 May 2026 (UTC)

:@DoveTheEditor, I've just reverted your edit, see {{diff||prev|1354883867}}. I'm afraid that '''neither''' of the URLs you've provided can be treated as a reliable source, see WP:RS ↗, WP:IMDB ↗, and WP:CITEIMDB ↗.
:{{tq|There's also a video of her saying that.}} Well, please provide a URL that contains the video so that we can assess its reliability. Thanks, Thedarkknightli (talk) 19:38, 18 May 2026 (UTC)

Vinayak Damodar Savarkar


Please use the article talk page ↗ to explain your objections to AlphaVictorDelta0107's edit to :Vinayak Damodar Savarkar ↗ '''before''' you revert back. I know that you explained in your edit summary when you made your first revert, but he/she did not get it. Maybe a more detailed explanation on the article talk page would do the trick.<span style="font-family:Monotype Corsiva;font-size:10pt;color:#000000">-- Toddy1 (talk)</span> 07:53, 23 May 2026 (UTC)

OrphanReferenceFixer: Help on reversion


Hi there! I check pages listed in :Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting ↗ to try to fix reference errors. Recently, you reverted ↗ my fix to :Angelina Jolie ↗.

If you did this because the references should be removed from the article, you have misunderstood the situation. Most likely, the article originally contained both <code><nowiki><ref name="foo">...</ref></nowiki></code> and one or more <code><nowiki><ref name="foo"/></nowiki></code> referring to it. Someone then removed the <code><nowiki><ref name="foo">...</ref></nowiki></code> but left the <code><nowiki><ref name="foo"/></nowiki></code>, which results in a <strong class="error">big red error</strong> in the article. I replaced one of the remaining <code><nowiki><ref name="foo"/></nowiki></code> with a copy of the <code><nowiki><ref name="foo">...</ref></nowiki></code>; I ''did not'' re-insert the reference to where it was deleted, I just replaced one of the ''remaining'' instances. What you need to do to fix it is to make sure you remove '''all''' instances of the named reference so as to not leave any <strong class="error">big red error</strong>.

If you reverted because I made an actual mistake, please be sure to also correct any reference errors in the page so I won't come back and make the same mistake again. Also, please post an error report at User talk:AnomieBOT so my operator can fix me! If the error is so urgent that I need to be stopped, also post a message at User:AnomieBOT/shutoff/OrphanReferenceFixer. Thanks! AnomieBOT<span style="color:#880">⚡</span> 12:45, 11 June 2026 (UTC) <small style="color:#888">If you do not wish to receive this message in the future, add {{tlx|bots|2=optout=AnomieBOT-OrphanReferenceFixer}} to your talk page.</small>