User Talk: SomeAnotherCastaway

Server-side rendered snapshot of this editor's Wikipedia talk page discussions.

Welcome!

Hi SomeAnotherCastaway! I noticed your contributions ↗ and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

{{Clickable button|Help:Introduction|Learn more about editing|class=mw-ui-progressive|style=margin-left: 1.6em;}}

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia ↗ page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

{{Clickable button|Wikipedia:Teahouse|Get help at the Teahouse|style=margin-left: 1.6em;}}

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

{{Clickable button|Wikipedia:Task Center|Volunteer at the Task Center|style=margin-left: 1.6em;}}

Happy editing!  CNMall41 (talk) 20:49, 23 February 2025 (UTC)

March 2025

25px|alt=Information icon ↗ Hello. Thank you for your contributions ↗ to Wikipedia ↗. I noticed that your recent edit to :Masters of the Universe (2026 film) ↗ did not have an edit summary ↗. You can use the edit summary field to explain your reasoning for an edit, or to provide a description of what the edit changes. Summaries save time for other editors and reduce the chances that your edit will be misunderstood. For some edits, an adequate summary may be quite brief ↗.

The edit summary field looks like this:
{{Edit summary field/OOUI}}

'''Please provide an edit summary for every edit you make.''' With a Wikipedia account ↗, you can give yourself a reminder by setting {{myprefs|3|check={{int:tog-forceeditsummary}}}}, and then click the "{{int:saveprefs}}" button.
Thanks!{{sp}} BOVINEBOY2008 01:21, 2 March 2025 (UTC)

Edit warring advice

To avoid getting into trouble for edit warring ↗ and breaking the WP:3RR ↗, I recommend taking your dispute with the IP about Li Jun Li in the cast on Sinners (2025 film) ↗ to the talk page ↗, where you can discuss and come to consensus. —Ganesha811 (talk) 18:50, 20 April 2025 (UTC)

:Thank you. Would you mind deleting it for me, please? I'll start a discussion there. SomeAnotherCastaway (talk) 18:59, 20 April 2025 (UTC)
::The status quo is fine while consensus is determined, it's not an urgent issue. Thanks for starting the discussion, I'll keep an eye on it. —Ganesha811 (talk) 19:08, 20 April 2025 (UTC)
:::The discussion has begun. Please check it out when you have the chance. SomeAnotherCastaway (talk) 19:16, 20 April 2025 (UTC)

April 2025

30px|link= ↗ You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war ↗ according to the reverts you have made on :Sinners (2025 film) ↗. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate ↗ with others, to avoid editing disruptively ↗, and to try to reach a consensus ↗, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:
# '''Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;'''
# '''Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.'''
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page ↗ to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard ↗ or seek dispute resolution ↗. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection ↗. If you engage in an edit war, you '''may be blocked ↗ from editing.''' ''Look, I said the status quo would be fine. This is the 5th time you've reverted that material in less than 24 hours. You could easily be blocked for this per WP:3RR ↗, but I'll hold off on a block as you are willing to discuss and started a discussion. Still, be on notice for edit warring.'' —Ganesha811 (talk) 19:36, 20 April 2025 (UTC)
: Yep. Got it. I'll stop.SomeAnotherCastaway (talk) 19:40, 20 April 2025 (UTC)

May 2025

25px|alt=Information icon ↗ Please don't change the format of dates, as you did to ''Grand Theft Auto VI ↗''. As a general rule, if an article has evolved using predominantly one format, the dates should be left in the format they were originally written in, unless there are reasons for changing it based on '''strong''' national ties to the topic ↗. For more information about how dates should be written on Wikipedia, please see this page ↗. If you have any questions, please feel free to ask me here or on my talk page. Thank you.  – '''''Rhain''''' ☔ (he/him ↗) 03:11, 3 May 2025 (UTC)

30px|link=|alt=Copyright problem icon ↗ Your edit to :The Amazing World of Gumball ↗ has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted ↗ material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission ↗ from the copyright holder. If you {{em|are}} the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials ↗ for information on how to contribute your work appropriately. For legal reasons, Wikipedia strictly cannot host copyrighted text or images from print media or digital platforms without an appropriate ↗ and verifiable license. Contributions infringing on copyright will be removed. You may use external websites or publications as a source of {{em|information}}, but not as a source of {{em|content}}, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy '''will be blocked from editing ↗'''. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources ↗ for more information.  '''EvergreenFir''' (talk) 17:22, 19 May 2025 (UTC)

FYI

This is a notice to let you know that I've reported the IP editor seeking Li Jun Li's inclusion in the poster billing on Sinners (2025 film) ↗ and committing WP:NPA ↗ violations at User talk:Dr vulpes#Thanks. Lord Sjones23 (talk - contributions) 05:39, 18 May 2025 (UTC)

:Thank you very much. They've been getting on my nerves. SomeAnotherCastaway (talk) 15:18, 18 May 2025 (UTC)

::No problem. There are some ongoing discussions at Talk:Sinners (2025 film)#Plot summary edits ↗ and Talk:Sinners (2025 film)#Edit War Dispute ↗ if you are interested. Lord Sjones23 (talk - contributions) 00:18, 19 May 2025 (UTC)

About ''Dora and the Search for Sol Dorado ↗''

I don't care what I say, but this film is announced to be produced for television. So I call it a "Nickelodeon Original Film". Just stop the edit war. Okay? Be reliable next time. Akhil K. (talk) 20:43, 23 May 2025 (UTC)

:You be reliable. A Facebook post is not a reliable source. Besides, the film is coming out on Paramount+ first, so it is technically not a "Nickelodeon Original Film." SomeAnotherCastaway (talk) 02:40, 24 May 2025 (UTC)
::How about coming to Nickelodeon first, then Paramount+. Here's the source: https://deadline.com/2025/05/dora-and-the-search-for-sol-dorado-streaming-premiere-date-1236405074/. Akhil K. (talk) 16:46, 24 May 2025 (UTC)
:::Then it would premiere on Paramount+ first. SomeAnotherCastaway (talk) 17:09, 24 May 2025 (UTC)
::::But still counts as an original film because it also says, "Nickelodeon" and according the article the quote says, "''Dora and the Search for Sol Dorado'', the latest live-action movie in kids franchise ''Dora the Explorer'', is set to premiere on Paramount+ and Nickelodeon in the U.S. on Wednesday, July 2." Akhil K. (talk) 21:43, 24 May 2025 (UTC)
:::::Well, Good Burger 2 was a Nickelodeon original film, and that uses Nickelodeon Movies. Same with A Really Haunted Loud House. No Time to Spy. The list goes on and on. So keep it as Nickelodeon Movies. SomeAnotherCastaway (talk) 21:50, 24 May 2025 (UTC)
::::::Good Burger 2 is not an original film, but A Really Haunted Loud House and No Time to Spy are. Including other films that are produced for television, if simulcast on Paramount+. Akhil K. (talk) 21:57, 24 May 2025 (UTC)
:::::::The point remains. They all used the Nickelodeon Movies logo. That is why it shall remain up. SomeAnotherCastaway (talk) 01:59, 25 May 2025 (UTC)

June 2025

25px|alt=Information icon ↗ I noticed that you added Template:Rotten Tomatoes prose ↗ to KPop Demon Hunters ↗, but you didn't provide a reliable source ↗. On Wikipedia, it's important that article content be verifiable ↗. The documentation for the template highlights that if you set <code>|ref=y</code>, it only includes the reference if the "Rotten Tomatoes ID" property is defined on Wikidata ↗. Otherwise, you need to add the reference separately in the article which I've now done. Please remember to verify and include references when using this type of template. Thank you. Sariel Xilo (talk) 15:59, 20 June 2025 (UTC)

Plot summary

Lemme explain:

We need a plot summary for the movie. I put that there so that way editors will be encouraged to write a plot summary for the movie. Because frankly, a premise isn't enough. The majority of movies on Wikipedia have plot summaries. HiGuys69420 (talk) 03:56, 22 June 2025 (UTC)

:I understand that we need a plot summary. But we don't add that if it's listed under the premise tab. Someone will add a plot eventually.SomeAnotherCastaway (talk) 04:55, 22 June 2025 (UTC)

heads-up!!

the list of pokémon anime characters was actually redirected over this discussion in afd ↗, so that blar wasn't vandalism. thus, to reinstate or recreate it, you'd need to at least address the issues there. at least in my current view, that'd involve finding any sources to establish notability for the cast in general... at all, really '''consarn ↗ (grave) ↗ (obituary) ↗''' 20:38, 10 July 2025 (UTC)

Talkback, July 2025

{{Talkback|Talk:Dora and the Search for Sol Dorado#July 2025}} '''M.''' Bill'''oo''' 05:55, 24 July 2025 (UTC)
:Reminder, although I have partially changed it back now. Thank you. '''M.''' Bill'''oo''' 01:34, 31 July 2025 (UTC)
::Replied, please check. '''M.''' Bill'''oo''' 13:00, 31 July 2025 (UTC)
:::Please check a comment, hope for your response as well. '''M.''' Bill'''oo''' 02:29, 11 August 2025 (UTC)

August 2025

25px|alt=Information icon ↗ Hello, I'm Belbury. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, :Jay Kelly ↗, but you didn't provide a reliable source ↗. On Wikipedia, it's important that article content be verifiable ↗. If you'd like to resubmit your change with a citation ↗, your edit is archived in the page history ↗. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you.  Belbury (talk) 13:30, 4 August 2025 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:OutRun (film) ↗

25px|alt=Information icon ↗ Hello, SomeAnotherCastaway. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:OutRun (film) ↗, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted ↗, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it ↗ again or request ↗ that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted ↗ so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 00:12, 22 September 2025 (UTC)

New message from 1isall

{{talkback|Talk:The Super Mario Galaxy Movie|Secondary sources|ts=02:29, 11 November 2025 (UTC)}}
Please see the section as to why secondary sources are preferred over primary ones. This is for in case you missed my ping. Thanks, 1isall (he/him) (talk <nowiki>|</nowiki> contribs ↗) 02:29, 11 November 2025 (UTC)

*No, I saw your ping. You make valid points, and I apologize.SomeAnotherCastaway (talk) 02:51, 11 November 2025 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Untitled Whac-A-Mole film ↗

25px|alt=Information icon ↗ Hello, SomeAnotherCastaway. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Untitled Whac-A-Mole film ↗, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted ↗, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it ↗ again or request ↗ that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted ↗ so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 14:07, 17 November 2025 (UTC)

November 2025

25px|alt=Information icon ↗ Hello, I'm Denonia. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions ↗ have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse ↗ or the Help desk ↗. Thanks. Denonia✉ 00:26, 22 November 2025 (UTC)

25px|alt=Information icon ↗ Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism ↗ and have been reverted ↗. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges ↗. Thank you. Denonia✉ 00:26, 22 November 2025 (UTC)

W:FG billing

Your edits have been reverted. Cynthia Erivo is billed first than Ariana Grande and this is supported by numerous reliable sources and should not be changed. If you have an issue with it, discuss it on the page’s talk page. Thank you. Denonia✉ 00:33, 22 November 2025 (UTC)

Edit summaries

25px|alt=Information icon ↗ Hello. Thank you for your contributions ↗ to Wikipedia ↗. I noticed that one or more recent edits you made did not have an edit summary ↗. Collaboration among editors is fundamental to Wikipedia, and every edit should be explained by a clear edit summary ↗, or by discussion on the talk page ↗. Please use the edit summary field to explain your reasoning for an edit and/or to describe what it changes. Summaries save time for other editors and reduce the chances that your edit will be misunderstood. For some edits, an adequate summary may be quite brief ↗.

The edit summary field looks like this:
{{Edit summary field/OOUI}}

or in the visual editor:
{{Edit summary field/VisualEditor}}

{{strong|Please provide an edit summary for every edit you make.}} When logged in to your Wikipedia account ↗, you can give yourself a reminder by setting {{myprefs|3|check={{int:tog-forceeditsummary}}}}, and then click the "{{int:saveprefs}}" button.
Thanks!{{sp}} ''Signed, SleepyRedHair.'' (talk - contribs ↗) 14:32, 22 November 2025 (UTC)

Concern of ''FNAF 2 ↗'' movie BO receipt

We do round the box office total up or down, yes. But that's only for the lead paragraph. We don't round it up or down in the infobox. Multiplivision (talk) 02:42, 7 December 2025 (UTC)

:Inconsistent gross figures are just not constructive. Also, according to MOS:LARGENUM ↗: "Avoid using approximately, about, and similar terms with figures that have merely been approximated or rounded in a normal and expected way" SomeAnotherCastaway (talk) 03:07, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
::It doesn't work that way. We '''only''' round if it's over or under 5 in decimals. Multiplivision (talk) 16:14, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
:::Dude, there are decimals. Why do you think I'm rounding up and down? SomeAnotherCastaway (talk) 16:16, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
::::You're literally rounding ''The Bad Guys 2''{{'}}s gross to the '''nearest whole number''' (in this case, $240 million), when their worldwide gross is $239.2 million. You're not rounding it up properly. Multiplivision (talk) 16:17, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
:::::I'm only rounding it up because the amount grown both domestically and internationally are above 5 in the decimal range. SomeAnotherCastaway (talk) 16:18, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
::::::It does not work that way. Multiplivision (talk) 16:19, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
:::::::How? How does it not work that way? SomeAnotherCastaway (talk) 16:19, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
::::::::The worldwide gross for ''The Bad Guys 2'', as of today, is $239,193,810. As per rounding to the nearest number, we round it up to $239.2 million. We don't near it to $240 million. I don't care if the domestic and international grosses round to the nearest number.
::::::::'''This''' is how it is supposed to be done:
::::::::$82,593,605 (domestic) → $82.6 million (rounding to nearest decimal, being 6)
::::::::$156,600,205 (international) → $156.6 million (stays the same because there are no numbers exceeding)
::::::::$239,193,810 (worldwide) → $239.2 million (rounding to nearest decimal, being 2) Multiplivision (talk) 16:23, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
:::::::::In addition, per the lead paragraph, we round it to the '''nearest whole number''', with it being $239 million '''flat'''. Multiplivision (talk) 16:23, 8 December 2025 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Unabom (film) ↗

25px|alt=Information icon ↗ Hello, SomeAnotherCastaway. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Unabom (film) ↗, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted ↗, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it ↗ again or request ↗ that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted ↗ so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 03:07, 10 December 2025 (UTC)

Zootopia 2 ↗

Do you have updated sources for the box office? The referenced cites in the text and infobox both link to the $992M figure. LizardJr8 (talk) 00:37, 14 December 2025 (UTC)

:Yes. Right here: https://deadline.com/2025/12/box-office-zootopia-2-five-nights-at-freddys-2-ella-mccay-1236647494/ SomeAnotherCastaway (talk) 02:00, 14 December 2025 (UTC)

December 2025

25px|alt=Information icon ↗ Hello, I'm SleepyRedHair. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, :Disclosure Day ↗, but you didn't provide a reliable source ↗. On Wikipedia, it's important that article content be verifiable ↗. If you'd like to resubmit your change with a citation ↗, your edit is archived in the page history ↗. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you.  ''Signed, SleepyRedHair.'' (talk - contribs ↗) 15:16, 31 December 2025 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Honeymoon with Harry ↗

25px|alt=Information icon ↗ Hello, SomeAnotherCastaway. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Honeymoon with Harry ↗, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted ↗, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it ↗ again or request ↗ that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted ↗ so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 21:08, 18 January 2026 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Untitled Martin Scorsese film ↗

25px|alt=Information icon ↗ Hello, SomeAnotherCastaway. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Untitled Martin Scorsese film ↗, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted ↗, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it ↗ again or request ↗ that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted ↗ so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 06:07, 25 January 2026 (UTC)

MikeAllen's edit

Why did you undo MikeAllen's edit? He said specifically "t''oo soon no reviews are even discussed in article''". Also, how come you put "negative" reviews on Scream 7 when Scream 3 received a similar RT score and is credited as having "mixed" reviews? NarutoSan6000 (talk) 21:38, 26 February 2026 (UTC)

:As they usually do. It's borderline disruptive. '''Mike Allen''' 22:06, 26 February 2026 (UTC)
::How is it too soon to add that the film received negative reviews?
::Also, the reason why Scream 3 is mixed and Scream 7 is negative is because of their Metacritic scores, which label them as mixed or negative. 3 has a 56, meaning mixed, while 7 has a 39, meaning negative. SomeAnotherCastaway (talk) 22:18, 26 February 2026 (UTC)
:::oh so we just go by the Metacritic consensus in the lead? that should be clarified then. '''Mike Allen''' 22:48, 26 February 2026 (UTC)
::::I mean, that was my thought. I always thought that's how it went, unless I'm misremembering something. SomeAnotherCastaway (talk) 01:00, 27 February 2026 (UTC)
:::::Okay, can you put "on metacritic" next to your edit then? That's how you clarify something. Also when you reverted Mike's edit you again forgot to use an edit summary. NarutoSan6000 (talk) 01:36, 27 February 2026 (UTC)
::::::That's my bad. I keep doing that. I did put that it was per Metacritic in the arrow. SomeAnotherCastaway (talk) 01:43, 27 February 2026 (UTC)
:::::::Fair enough. NarutoSan6000 (talk) 01:43, 27 February 2026 (UTC)

February 2026

25px|alt=Information icon ↗ Hello. I have noticed that you {{usertalk other|often ↗|often}} edit without using an edit summary ↗. Please do your best to {{strong|always fill in the summary field}}. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. To help yourself remember, you may wish to set {{Preferences|3|check={{int:tog-forceeditsummary}}}}. Thanks!  '''Mike Allen''' 22:06, 26 February 2026 (UTC)

Wikipedia's rule:

I suggest you read this:

Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Abbreviations#Full points (periods) ↗ NarutoSan6000 (talk) 08:11, 1 March 2026 (UTC)

Shiver

The film is currently untitled, it was called Shiver but not anymore, if you read the new article. KingArti (talk) 20:19, 5 March 2026 (UTC)

:Yep. Just saw that. Let me try and change it back. SomeAnotherCastaway (talk) 20:20, 5 March 2026 (UTC)

Nomination of :Unabom (upcoming film) ↗ for deletion

<div class="afd-notice">
<div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0;">48px|alt=|link= ↗</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article :Unabom (upcoming film) ↗ is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines ↗ or whether it should be deleted ↗.

The article will be discussed at '''Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Unabom (upcoming film) ↗''' until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.</div> BOVINEBOY2008 08:42, 10 March 2026 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Out Run (film) ↗

25px|alt=Information icon ↗ Hello, SomeAnotherCastaway. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Out Run (film) ↗, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted ↗, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it ↗ again or request ↗ that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted ↗ so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 18:08, 20 March 2026 (UTC)

March 2026

25px|alt=Information icon ↗ Hi, and thank you for your contributions ↗ to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to change the title of a page by cutting its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into :Flowervale Street ↗. This is known as a "cut-and-paste move ↗", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history ↗, which is legally required for attribution ↗. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be ''moved'' to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases for registered users, once your account is four days old and has ten edits ↗, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab ↗ at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu ↗ for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect ↗ from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves ↗ to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Requests for history merge ↗. Thank you.  BOVINEBOY2008 08:12, 26 March 2026 (UTC)

Project Hail Mary box office

Frankly, I don't care about this because it's going to blow past $170 million worldwide anyway, but... why did you change this back to $170 million when the citation it is using doesn't show that? Further, look at this ↗; shows $168 million. --Hammersoft (talk) 02:11, 28 March 2026 (UTC)

:That's Box Office Mojo. Did you check here ↗? SomeAnotherCastaway (talk) 02:15, 28 March 2026 (UTC)
::No, because at the time that cite hadn't been provided, and the one that was was not in congruence with the provided figures. --Hammersoft (talk) 03:49, 28 March 2026 (UTC)
:::Well, usually we have two sources, The Numbers and Box Office Mojo. Numbers updates daily, while idk BOM's update schedule. SomeAnotherCastaway (talk) 04:56, 28 March 2026 (UTC)

April 2026

25px|alt=Information icon ↗ Hi SomeAnotherCastaway! I noticed that you've made several edits in order to restore a version of an article. The impulse to repeatedly undo an edit you disagree with is understandable, but I wanted to make sure that you're aware of Wikipedia's edit warring policy ↗. Repeatedly undoing the changes made by other users in a back-and-forth fashion like this is disallowed, even if you feel what you're doing is justifiable.

All editors are expected to discuss content disputes on article talk pages ↗ in order to try to reach a consensus ↗ with the other editors involved. If you are unable to come to an agreement, please use one of the dispute resolution options ↗ that are available in order to seek input from others. Using this approach instead of repeatedly reverting other editors' changes can help you avoid getting drawn into edit wars. Thank you. Tbhotch™ (CC BY-SA 4.0) 19:26, 5 April 2026 (UTC)

Heart Eyes 2

The way you made the article was very barebones and unprofessional. Leave this stuff to me, I can do it better. KingArti (talk) 21:45, 22 April 2026 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Untitled Mitchells vs. the Machines sequel ↗

48px|left|alt=|link= ↗

Hello, SomeAnotherCastaway. This message concerns the Articles for Creation ↗ submission or draft ↗ page you started, "Untitled Mitchells vs. the Machines sequel ↗".

Drafts that go unedited for six months are eligible for deletion, in accordance with our draftspace policy ↗, and this one has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply {{edit|Draft:Untitled Mitchells vs. the Machines sequel|edit the submission}}, and remove the {{tlc|db-afc}}, {{tlc|db-draft}}, or {{tlc|db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you read this, you can '''request its undeletion''' ↗. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the draft so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia!  DreamRimmer bot II (talk) 17:26, 2 May 2026 (UTC)

May 2026

25px|alt=Information icon ↗ Hello, I'm Jolielover. I noticed that you recently removed content ↗ from :Red, White & Royal Wedding ↗ without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary ↗. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page ↗. Thanks. jolielover♥talk 07:33, 12 May 2026 (UTC)

25px|alt=Information icon ↗ Hello, I'm Trailblazer101. I noticed that you recently removed content ↗ from :The Mandalorian and Grogu ↗ without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary ↗. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page ↗. ''The critical response summary you removed from the lead was accurate and cited in the Reception section. It does not require a reference in the lead, per WP:LEADCITE ↗, and it complies fully with MOS:FILMCRITICS ↗. The mixed reviews wording is a generalized description that is far too vague to provide any encyclopedic value, and not necessarily reflective of how present sources describe the critical response.'' — ''Trailblazer'''''101'''🔥 (discuss · contribs ↗) 01:05, 20 May 2026 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Untitled Whac-A-Mole film ↗

48px|left|alt=|link= ↗

Hello, SomeAnotherCastaway. This message concerns the Articles for Creation ↗ submission or draft ↗ page you started, "Untitled Whac-A-Mole film ↗".

Drafts that go unedited for six months are eligible for deletion, in accordance with our draftspace policy ↗, and this one has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply {{edit|Draft:Untitled Whac-A-Mole film|edit the submission}}, and remove the {{tlc|db-afc}}, {{tlc|db-draft}}, or {{tlc|db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you read this, you can '''request its undeletion''' ↗. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the draft so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia!  DreamRimmer bot II (talk) 17:26, 17 May 2026 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:I Eat Poop ↗

48px|left|alt=|link= ↗

Hello, SomeAnotherCastaway. This message concerns the Articles for Creation ↗ submission or draft ↗ page you started, "I Eat Poop ↗".

Drafts that go unedited for six months are eligible for deletion, in accordance with our draftspace policy ↗, and this one has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply {{edit|Draft:I Eat Poop|edit the submission}}, and remove the {{tlc|db-afc}}, {{tlc|db-draft}}, or {{tlc|db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you read this, you can '''request its undeletion''' ↗. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the draft so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia!  DreamRimmer bot II (talk) 14:25, 4 June 2026 (UTC)

Who's gonna protect Sonic the Hedgehog 4?

You know from me putting Miles "Tails" Prower in and on between Amy Rose and Knuckles the Echidna. ~2026-17806-98 ↗ (talk) 09:15, 9 June 2026 (UTC)

:Why did you even want to do that in the first place? We have a billing block, and she is not listed in between Bell and Elba. SomeAnotherCastaway (talk) 12:19, 9 June 2026 (UTC)

Redirect listed at Redirects for discussion ↗

30px ↗
Redirects you have created have been listed at redirects for discussion ↗ to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines ↗. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at '''{{slink| Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2026 June 25#Untitled Spider-Man: No Way Home sequel }}''' until a consensus is reached.  — ''Trailblazer'''''101'''🔥 (discuss · contribs ↗) 17:46, 25 June 2026 (UTC)

The Angry Birds Movie 3 ↗

What I meant by "unsourced" was that the citation did not support your removal of production companies, which were all mentioned in the source cited, and addition of John Cohen Productions (which I don't think even exists). ''Signed, SleepyRedHair.'' (talk - contribs ↗) 16:30, 29 June 2026 (UTC)

:I thought every company that's listed under "in association with" only helped out with finances and didn't help make the movie at all. Is that not right? SomeAnotherCastaway (talk) 16:35, 29 June 2026 (UTC)
::Yes, that is true, but that's not the case in this scenario. The source in question is DNEG's page for the film ↗, which listed all of the companies as "production companies" and mentions nothing about financers. ''Signed, SleepyRedHair.'' (talk - contribs ↗) 16:40, 29 June 2026 (UTC)
:::That's the thing. What if that website considers financiers production companies by accident? Who's to say that they are actually right in this scenario and not Paramount? SomeAnotherCastaway (talk) 16:56, 29 June 2026 (UTC)
::::That's a good point. Maybe the production companies should be based on multiple sources rather than just one. I'll have a look and try something. ''Signed, SleepyRedHair.'' (talk - contribs ↗) 17:34, 29 June 2026 (UTC)
:::::Yeah, that would be preferred, if Paramount's website isn't proof enough SomeAnotherCastaway (talk) 18:07, 29 June 2026 (UTC)
::::::Edit has been done. I've only just now noticed that "in association with" was explicitly said in the article despite me having worked on this article since it was a draft in 2024. That's my bad, lol. ''Signed, SleepyRedHair.'' (talk - contribs ↗) 18:10, 29 June 2026 (UTC)
:::::::Yeah, lol. No worries SomeAnotherCastaway (talk) 18:11, 29 June 2026 (UTC)
:::::::Are you sure about the website? Cause it works fine for me. SomeAnotherCastaway (talk) 19:46, 29 June 2026 (UTC)
::::::::Oh. I realised what I did wrong; I included part of the comment syntax in the link. My mistake once again. ''Signed, SleepyRedHair.'' (talk - contribs ↗) 20:22, 29 June 2026 (UTC)