User Talk: Telenovelafan215
Server-side rendered snapshot of this editor's Wikipedia talk page discussions.
{{nobots}}
{{talk header |bottom= |custom_header= |wp= |display_title= |arpol= |sc1= |sc2= |sc3= |sc4= |sc5= |demospace= |hide_find_sources= |search_term1= |search_term2= |search-domain= |search= |noarchive= }}
Awards won by the telenovela "Cañaveral de pasiones"
Hello!
Wish you a Happy New Year full of health and success in all your endeavors. This message is to share with you a series of sources that confirm some more awards won by the 1996 Televisa telenovela "Cañaveral de pasiones" and some of its actors.
Here is a photo of Christian Bach (along with associate producer Gerardo Zurita) posing with the 1997 Eres Award for Best Telenovela: https://www.facebook.com/photo/?fbid=6079205818756980&set=a.5985970294747200
This one is a photo of Daniela Castro, winner for Best Actress: https://www.facebook.com/photo/?fbid=6078972195447009&set=a.5985970294747200
And, finally, this is Juan Soler, posing with his award for Best Actor: https://www.facebook.com/photo/?fbid=6078774102133485&set=a.5985970294747200
Naturally, these pictures have been uploaded by fans, so I guess it wouldn't be wise to cite the Facebook account, yet I think a photo confirms the fact that these awards have been given to these artists in particular. Actually, I'd appreciate it if you could give me a piece of advice on whether I should add it in the awards list, since what I'm trying to avoid is to get into trouble anew for the same reason, ha-ha!
I've also found other sources, where it is mentioned that Francisco Gattorno and Azela Robinson have won the 1997 Latin ACE Awards for Best Actor and Best Supporting Actress respectively for their performances (in Gattorno's case, it wouldn't be a surprise, since he has been recognized by the Association of Latin Entertainment Critics more than once -he has been honored for his performances in "La dueña", "Laberintos de pasión", "Amores verdaderos" and "Muchacha italiana viene a casarse", apart from some of his interventions in theater).
Anyway, I have found this award being mentioned here (https://www.dcubanos.com/somos/francisco-gattorno/) and here (https://www.cineinformacionymas.com/post/lifetime-amores-que-enga%C3%B1an-amor-compartido#:~:text=*%20FRANCISCO%20GATTORNO&text=En%201997%20recibi%C3%B3%20el%20premio,en%20%E2%80%9CLaberintos%20de%20Pasi%C3%B3n%E2%80%9D.) as part of the actor's biography. Which onee is more reliable, according to you?
Also, when it comes to Azela Robnison's award, it is mentioned in the Trivia Section of her IMDB biography (which I understand is not the most reliable source) and it is also brought out here (https://www.gabrielblanco.cc/nuevaweb/pdf/azela_robison.pdf) and in this article by ''El informador'' (https://www.informador.mx/Entretenimiento/Azela-Robinson-villana-reconocida-por-el-publico-20100825-0109.html) which I have already cited in "Laberintos de pasión".
Definitely, I can tell it sounds logical that in this kind of shows some information may sometimes be incomplete or even deliberately altered, since it is a task of fans to find and sort out all this information, which many times can get confusing (personally, I'm sure Angélica Aragón must have won something too, but since I haven´t found anything that confirms it, I can´t assume it's actually true).
So, what am I supposed to do? What would you say if I added all this and then you remove whatever doesn't convince you, so we don't start any kind of conflict?
Thanks for your attention and all your guidance. It's been really valuable to me when it comes to editing Wikipedia, believe me. That's why I actually like to share my findings with you; it's because I'm aware that you will know better what must be done in most cases.
Have a nice and fruitful day.
Greetings, Nick Bizer (talk) 12:42, 13 January 2025 (UTC)
:The images from Facebook cannot be used as Facebook is listed as an unreliable source. See here: WP:RSPFACEBOOK ↗ for details. Telenovelafan215 (talk) 21:12, 15 January 2025 (UTC)
Translation request
Hi {{U|Telenovelafan215}} I see you say you can translate pages from English to Spanish. I was wondering if you could create a page on the Spanish language Wikipedia for the article Kyle Kulinski ↗ please? It has other major language pages like English, German and French but not Spanish, so this would be very helpful. I look forward to hearing from you. Helper201 (talk) 23:46, 29 January 2025 (UTC)
:Working on it. https://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Usuario:Telenovelafan215/Kyle_Kulinski Telenovelafan215 (talk) 20:30, 30 January 2025 (UTC)
::@Helper201 {{done}}: :es:Kyle Kulinski ↗. Telenovelafan215 (talk) 02:14, 31 January 2025 (UTC)
:::{{U|Telenovelafan215}}, brilliant! Thank you so much! Helper201 (talk) 07:05, 31 January 2025 (UTC)
La casa de los famosos 5 All stars
Hey! I was wondering if I can help you add-in the celebrities who enter the house. Let me know. Thanks! Danny5784 (talk) 00:27, 5 February 2025 (UTC)
:Yes as long as you add them when they are revealed. No speculation ↗. Telenovelafan215 (talk) 00:31, 5 February 2025 (UTC)
::Sure thing! I just added Julia Gama ↗ as the 3rd person from season 2. Danny5784 (talk) 00:41, 5 February 2025 (UTC)
:::You need to make sure you are not adding repetitive content as you have done twice now. https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=La_casa_de_los_famosos_season_5&oldid=1274003576 ↗https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=La_casa_de_los_famosos_season_5&oldid=1274004129 ↗ Telenovelafan215 (talk) 00:46, 5 February 2025 (UTC)
::::Alright I will make sure. Danny5784 (talk) 00:48, 5 February 2025 (UTC)
Proposed deletion ↗ of :File:A Dona do Pedaço soundtrack vol 1.jpg ↗
left|link=|alt=Notice|48px| ↗
The file :File:A Dona do Pedaço soundtrack vol 1.jpg ↗ has been proposed for deletion ↗ because of the following concern:
<blockquote>'''Non-free album cover being used in a decorative manner in :A Dona do Pedaço#Soundtrack ↗. Non-free album cover art is generally allowed to be used for primary identification purposes in stand-alone articles about albums, but its use in other articles is generally only allowed when the cover art itself is the subject of sourced critical commentary as explained in :WP:NFC#cite_note-3 ↗ and the context for non-free use ↗ required by :WP:NFCC#8 ↗ is evident. There is no such commentary for this particular album cover anywhere in the article, and the use of soundtrack album cover art in articles about films or TV programs is generally not allowed for this reason as explained in :WP:FILMSCORE ↗ and :MOS:TVPRODUCTION ↗.'''</blockquote>
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons ↗.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary ↗ or on the file's talk page ↗.
Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process ↗, but other deletion process ↗es exist. In particular, the speedy deletion ↗ process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion ↗ allows discussion to reach consensus ↗ for deletion.<!-- Template:Proposed deletion notify --> -- Marchjuly (talk) 05:21, 5 February 2025 (UTC)
: The above also applies to :File:A Dona do Pedaço soundtrack vol 2.jpg ↗, and correspondingly to :File:Papás por conveniencia soundtrack.jpg ↗, :File:El gallo de oro tv series soundtrack.jpg ↗. :File:Vencer la culpa soundtrack.jpg ↗, and :File:Juego de mentiras soundtrack.jpg ↗. -- Marchjuly (talk) 05:22, 5 February 2025 (UTC)
::@Marchjuly I will go ahead and remove them so they can be deleted. I have read the concern and did not know cover arts couldn't be used on non stand-alone articles. Telenovelafan215 (talk) 05:42, 5 February 2025 (UTC)
::: I was posting the below while you were posting your above reply and didn't notice it. Since you've removed the files from the articles where they were being used, they will be tagged for speedy deletion as "orphaned non-free use" by a bot or a human file remover unless someone re-adds them back or to some other article. You're receive a notification of these for each of the files, which probably will be a lot of notifications if you do the same for the all the files I listed below. You can avoid this (if you want) by tagging the files for speedy deletion per :WP:G7 ↗ instead. An administrator should delete the files fairly quickly (perhaps even sometime today or tomorrow) and a bot will should remove their syntax from the articles where they're being used. -- Marchjuly (talk) 06:06, 5 February 2025 (UTC)
::::@Marchjuly In case you wanted to know these articles about TV shows: Segundo Sol ↗ and A Força do Querer ↗, are also using soundtrack album covers on their soundtrack/music section. I did not upload these but just letting you know about them. Telenovelafan215 (talk) 06:11, 5 February 2025 (UTC)
:::::Thank you for pointing them out. They've been prodded for deletion and the uploader notified. Files (non-free and free) aren't formally vetted and assessed before they're uploaded and added to a Wikipedia, i.e there's no approval process. So, non-free policy related problems often often only get noticed later on ↗ (sometimes years later on), and it's usually by chance or when someone else points them out. In your case, I just came across the first file while looking at various other non-free soundtrack album covers. Once I found more than one of these files uploaded by you having the same issue, I checked your file uploads to see if there were more. So, if you come across any more of these files (even uploaded by others), you can point them out if you want, do nothing if you want or prod them for deletion yourself if you want. You could also remove them from their respective articles, but just make sure to leave edit summaries explaining why. If, someone re-adds the file without addressing the issue, you can then start a discussion about the file at :WP:FFD ↗ if you want or bring to someone else's attention. -- 06:33, 5 February 2025 (UTC)
Soundtrack album covers
Hi Telenovelafan215. Over the years you seem to have uploaded quite a number of non-free soundtrack covers and then added them to articles about TV shows. I'm sure you did this with the best of intentions, but such non-free, however, doesn't comply with Wikipedia's non-free content use policy ↗.{{pb}}I've already prodded six of these files for deletion and the reasons why I've done this are explained in the notification template added above, but you've upload many more of this type of file and they all have the same problem. :File:Te la dedico soundtrack vol 2.jpg ↗, :File:Rensga Hits! soundtrack cover.jpg ↗, :File:Te la dedico soundtrack.jpg ↗, :File:Café con aroma soundtrack.jpg ↗, :File:Tempo de Amar vol 2 soundtrack.jpg ↗, :File:Tempo de Amar vol 1 soundtrack.jpg ↗, :File:Deus Salve o Rei soundtrack.jpg ↗, :File:Orgulho e Paixão soundtrack.jpg ↗, :File:O Tempo Não Para soundtrack.jpg ↗, :File:O Sétimo Guardião vol 2 soundtrack.jpg ↗, :File:O Sétimo Guardião vol 1 soundtrack.jpg ↗, :File:Órfãos da Terra soundtrack.jpg ↗, :File:Bom Sucesso Vol 1 soundtrack.jpg ↗, :File:Bom Sucesso Vol 2 soundtrack.jpg ↗, :File:Éramos Seis Vol 2 soundtrack.jpg ↗, :File:Éramos Seis Vol 1 soundtrack.jpg ↗, :File:Amor de Mãe Vol 2 soundtrack.jpg ↗, :File:Amor de Mãe Vol 1 soundtrack.jpg ↗ and :File:Salve-se Quem Puder Vol 1 soundtrack.jpg ↗ all have the same problem as the six I've already prodded for deletion. {{pb}}If you think any of the soundtrack albums corresponding to these files meets the criteria of :WP:NALBUMS ↗ and want to create a stand-alone article about it, then the relevant non-free album cover would be OK to use in the main infobox of that article; there's, however, really no way to justify their use in individual sections or articles about TV series/shows.{{pb}}If you disagree with my assessment, you can :WP:DEPROD ↗ the six files I've already prodded for deletion, and I will start a discussion about them at :WP:FFD ↗; I think, though, you're going to have a near impossible task of establishing a consensus in favor of their use and that the files should be kept. If you want to ask for other opinions on this, you can do so at :WP:MCQ ↗ or :WT:NFCC ↗. If, on the other hand, you acknowledge the non-free use problem I've pointed out and agree that the files should be deleted, you can tag them all for speedy deletion yourself per :WP:G7 ↗ or simply remove them from the articles where they're being used so that they end up being deleted per :WP:F5 ↗. If you have any questions about this, you can ask them at WP:MCQ or WT:NFCC. -- Marchjuly (talk) 06:00, 5 February 2025 (UTC)
:@Marchjuly Like I said in my previous reply I will go ahead and remove them from their respective articles so they can be deleted. Telenovelafan215 (talk) 06:02, 5 February 2025 (UTC)
March 2025
25px|alt=Information icon ↗ I noticed that a message you recently left to Fgute may have been unduly harsh. Please remember not to bite the newcomers ↗. If you see others making a common mistake ↗, consider politely pointing out what they did wrong and showing them how to correct it. It may take some time, but it helps us retain new editors. Thank you.<!-- Template:uw-bite --> The Bushranger <sub><span style="color: maroon;">One ping only</span></sub> 23:52, 26 March 2025 (UTC)
About recent removals
Hello and Happy Easter!
I noticed you recently reverted some of my edits (which were, actually, re-edits). Undoubtably, it's absolutely right that you patrol the pages to prevent possible vandalisms. In my case, I alaways double-check the sources I find and it happens that sometimes some of them contrast each other, so there are occassions when I get confused.
For example, the TLN Awards were originally sourced, but when I checked the kind of awards they were, I realized they had no real importance or impact in the actor's careers (at least, as I see it), since it was more of a dynamic for viewers to vote for their favorite shows or actors (the nominees were decided by the journalist who hosted the "show") and they were nothing more than a symbolic reference to tha viewers' favorites... That's why I decided to remove that information.
On the other part, when it comes to Arturo Peniche and Leticia Calderón's "Micrófono de Oro", I came across two different sources (the one that was originally there stated it was an award to recognize their "Artistic Excellence", so I thought it was a kind of recognition for their respective careers, in general -since the time when they started to the moment of that particular ceremony). But, a couple of days ago, I came across an article, published by Televisa, where it is stated clearly that "Arturo Peniche fue galardonado con El Micrófono de Oro en Dolores, Hidalgo por su destacada participación como protagonista en la telenovela "En nombre del amor" https://web.archive.org/web/20171107024446/http://www2.esmas.com/en-nombre-del-amor/noticias/073940/arturo-peniche-recibe-premio-nombre-del-amor/ ↗, which means it should be included as one of the awards won by that telenovela in particular and that my original assumption was wrong. Consequently, the same applies to Leticia Calderón https://www.informador.mx/Entretenimiento/Leticia-Calderon-recibe-Microfono-de-Oro-20090624-0077.html ↗. That's why I decided to restore them, to be honest...
On the other hand, in what refers to the "Galardones a los grandes de TVyNovelas", I came across a Youtube video (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EiI_ge_HDdk&ab_channel=RebeccaAnneJonesFuentes -this one, in quite a poor quality), where Rebecca Jones confirms it was a recognition for her career, as well as her performance in "Para volver a amar" -which means, the same goes for Camacho and Magda Guzmán or the actors from "Soy tu dueña", who were also awarded, according to the source from Televisa). I guess it was thought of as an extra recognition to some of the nominees in the official ceremony in addition to the official awards they were supposed to win on March 7th, 2011. Unfortunately, in the Best Actress category, they opted for the then young Angelique Boyer, leaving the beautiful Rebecca Jones without the statuette, no mater of the fact the actress really diserved it, at least in my opnion...
Thanks for your attention and I wish you have a good time with family and loved ones!
Blessings, Nick Bizer (talk) 19:33, 20 April 2025 (UTC)
Teleonce Programming
Hi there, I see you took issue with the TeleOnce programming article. As I stated in the Talk Page discussion that I started on the WLII page, The article that exist is incredible long and outdated. In order to "update it" it would need to be done from scratch (which is what I did). Additionally, whenever updates are made to the previous article it also is met with push backs and reversals. On the WLII talk page I said that I would create the page, link it and asked for you guys to read it, compare it and give it a chance to that we could have a proper updated programming page and in turn delete all of the information that makes the WLII page way too long. However the reaction was a quick reversal and a stamp of quick deletion on the page. I really don't think that helps anything here as no matter what anyone does to try and update this it is met with resistance. I implore you to please read the talk page and the new article carefully and to be more patient when undoing and labeling things in the future. Thanks. PR2021 (talk) 01:58, 14 June 2025 (UTC)
Recent edits on "Abismo de pasión"
Hi there!
This message is to inform you about some recent edits I have made on the article concerning the 2012 Televisa telenovela "Abismo de pasión". I just replaced the plot summary with one of my own invention, but trying to keep it coherent and cohesioned while not surpassing the word limit.
Furthermore, I have classified the cast as displayed in the first official opening theme by Televisa, which can be found right here (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zZ5bXk-xZFk&ab_channel=JuanFelipeMart%C3%ADnez). As you can see, originally Ludwika Paleta and César Évora were placed among the Main cast, despite the fact that their appearances lasted only 5 episodes within the context of the series. On the other hand, Livia Brito's name is presented after the title, which means she is not among the Main cast (I guess it's some kind of Televisa policy, but I just limited myself in following their own classification, where the "actuacioness multiestelares" and the "actuaciones espciales were included after the tile's display).
When it comes to the characters' names, I attached myself to the way they were recorded in the show's official site, which can be consulted following the link below: https://web.archive.org/web/20121231142321/http://televisa.esmas.com/entretenimiento/telenovelas/abismo-de-pasion/elenco In my opinion, it's a way of not exceeding onself adding a number of surnames or second names that the characters might have used in some part of a telenovela consisting of more that 160 episodes, so that the page would look more tidy and elegant.
I would also like to really thank you for having showed me (maybe without yourself knowing) the right way to use the web archive where old sites are preserved, since it is a very useful tool in order to find information about these topics (like official synopsis, characters' profiles and awards received by different productions). So, I want to thank you once more for this!
When it comes to the summary I added myself, I hope youl ike it... I tried to put an emphasis on the relationship between the friends and the misunderstanding that marks their lives, avoiding to mention major plot twists or important details, apart from the obvious fact of the "blood ties" between the two male leads).
Thanks for your attention and wish you all the best! Feel free to add or remove details from the plot summary, or correct the expression in case you detect any kind of incosistencies! Nick Bizer (talk) 14:38, 24 July 2025 (UTC)
''Masked Singer'' LTA
Continuing on from WP:ANI#IP 193.52.208.98 ↗ yesterday... looks like more reverting is needed, sadly... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/2001:861:41C0:3F30:0:0:0:0/64 ↗. Magitroopa (talk) 13:54, 6 September 2025 (UTC)
:At this point we should probably request a general sanction ↗ on Masked Singer pages and make a list of pages that need to be temporary or indefinitely protected. Similar to Wikipedia:General sanctions/Beauty pageants ↗. Telenovelafan215 (talk) 16:16, 6 September 2025 (UTC)
Juan Colucho
If IMDb isn’t reliable, why is it mentioned in "External Links"? VMLeblon (talk) 04:01, 25 September 2025 (UTC)
:WP:IMDB-EL ↗ explains why IMDb can be used as an external link but not as a reliable source. Telenovelafan215 (talk) 04:04, 25 September 2025 (UTC)
::You didn't answer my question: If IMDb isn’t reliable, why is it mentioned in "External Links"? VMLeblon (talk) 10:49, 25 September 2025 (UTC)
I have sent you a note about a page you started
Hi Telenovelafan215. Thank you for your work on Cómplices (TV series) ↗. Another editor, Rosiestep, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol ↗ and left the following comment:
::I enjoyed reading this article. Please translate the title of the foreign language reference(s) into English. Foreign language references should retain the foreign language version <code><noinclude>|title=</noinclude></code>, and add the translated title <code><noinclude>|trans-title=</noinclude></code>. More information here: Wikipedia:Press coverage ↗. If you have a question, please ping me. Thanks.
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{code|<nowiki>{{Re|</nowiki>Rosiestep<nowiki>}}</nowiki>}}. <small>(Message delivered via the Page Curation ↗ tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)</small><!-- Template:Sentnote-NPF -->
Rosiestep (talk) 15:32, 8 November 2025 (UTC)
:{{Re|Rosiestep}} {{done}} Telenovelafan215 (talk) 23:19, 8 November 2025 (UTC)
Speedy deletion declined: :Doménica Montero (2026 TV series) ↗
Hello Telenovelafan215. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of :Doménica Montero (2026 TV series) ↗, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Probably best to leave this one as a redirect, since it's been at this title for a few months by now. Thank you. asilvering (talk) 10:10, 9 November 2025 (UTC)
Regarding Papás por siempre ↗ (Parents Forever)
According to TelevisaUnivision ↗, it is considered a sequel, not a second season and a separate show to ''Papás por conveniencia ↗'' meaning that the show is sold to broadcasters separately from the original show as seen on their sales site ↗. VenezuelanSpongeBobFan2004 (talk) 08:43, 16 November 2025 (UTC)
ArbCom 2025 Elections voter message
<div class="ivmbox " style="margin-bottom: 1em; border: 1px solid #a2a9b1; background-color: #fdf2d5; padding: 0.5em; display: flex; align-items: center; ">
<div class="ivmbox-image" style="padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em;flex-basis: 40px">40px ↗</div>
<div class="ivmbox-text">
Hello! Voting in the '''2025 Arbitration Committee elections ↗''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2025|end}}-1 day}}. All '''eligible users ↗''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee ↗ is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process ↗. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans ↗, topic bans ↗, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy ↗ describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please review the candidates ↗ and submit your choices on the '''2025|poll}}|voting page ↗'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. <small>MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:44, 18 November 2025 (UTC)</small>
</div>
</div>
<!-- Message sent by User:Cyberpower678@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2025/Coordination/MM/05&oldid=1322758768 -->
Happy First Edit Anniversary Telenovelafan215 🎉
Hey @Telenovelafan215. Your wiki edit anniversary was 1 day ago, marking 10 years of dedicated contributions to English Wikipedia. Your passion for sharing knowledge and your remarkable contributions have not only enriched the project, but also inspired countless others to contribute. Thank you for your amazing contributions. Wishing you many more wonderful years ahead in the Wiki journey. :) -<span style="color:#990000">❙❚❚</span><span style="color:#339966">❙❙</span><span style="font-variant:small-caps;color:#000"> GnOeee </span><span style="color:#006699">❚❙❚</span><span style="color:#339966">❙❙</span> ✉ 17:15, 16 December 2025 (UTC)
Happy New Year, Telenovelafan215!
<div style="border: 3px solid #FFD700; background-color: #FFFAF0; padding:0.2em 0.4em; height:auto; min-height:173px; border-radius:1em; box-shadow:.1em .1em .5em rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.75); box-shadow:.1em .1em .5em light-dark(rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.75), rgba(255, 255, 255, 0.75));" class="plainlinks">
left|x173px ↗x173px|right ↗
{{Paragraph break}}
{{Center|{{resize|179%|'''''Happy New Year ↗!'''''}}}}
'''Telenovelafan215''',<br />Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year ↗, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia.
<br />Abishe (talk) 17:11, 31 December 2025 (UTC)<br /><br />
</div>
''{{resize|88%|Send New Year cheer by adding {{tls|Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.}}''
{{clear}}<!-- From template:Happy New Year fireworks --> Abishe (talk) 17:11, 31 December 2025 (UTC)
I have sent you a note about a page you started
Hi Telenovelafan215. Thank you for your work on Just Alice ↗. Another editor, Mariamnei, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol ↗ and left the following comment:
{{Bq|1=Thank you for your work on this article. Please establish notability as per WP:NFILMS ↗. Thanks and have a wonderful day!}}
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{code|<nowiki>{{Re|</nowiki>Mariamnei<nowiki>}}</nowiki>}}. <small>(Message delivered via the Page Curation ↗ tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)</small><!-- Template:Sentnote-NPF -->
Mariamnei (talk) 12:32, 15 January 2026 (UTC)
:See page history.....thank you. ~2026-31842-5 ↗ (talk) 14:20, 15 January 2026 (UTC)
:Hello {{Re|Mariamnei}}. ''Just Alice'' is not a film, it is a television series. I’m not sure why a television series would need to follow guidelines for film articles WP:FILMS ↗. Wouldn’t it in need to follow WP:NTV ↗ guidelines? Telenovelafan215 (talk) 16:14, 15 January 2026 (UTC)
::Good question (see page history, my edit summary). In general Wikipedia:Gng ↗ applies, as NTV is an essay not a guideline. ~2026-31842-5 ↗ (talk) 17:55, 15 January 2026 (UTC)
:::Thank you for writing to me. As has been pointed out above, WP:NTV ↗ is an essay. So I suppose that if it's not a film, we would follow WP:GNG ↗ guidelines. I hope that helps clarify. Have a wonderful day! Mariamnei (talk) 13:03, 19 January 2026 (UTC)
Article Request
Hi there Telenovelafan215,
You have a bunch of great articles that you made about TV series and all. I was wondering if you could make an article about a talk show that is on Telemundo ↗ which is called: La mesa caliente
Let me know, thanks! ArchiveSignal33 (talk) 14:58, 3 March 2026 (UTC)
May 2025
Hey there @Telenovelafan215!
Thanks for contributuing to the following articles I made: La mesa caliente ↗ and Zapata: Amor en rebeldía ↗! ArchiveSignal33 (talk) 02:49, 16 May 2026 (UTC)
:Hello there @Telenovelafan215! Thanks again for contributing to the article: En casa con Telemundo ↗ that I made! ArchiveSignal33 (talk) 18:12, 16 May 2026 (UTC)
Facts & Ideas
Hello there!
I really hope you're doing great! Today I'm opening this new topic in order to discuss with you about some edits I wouldl ike to make and know your opinion (and, of course, manage to get your contribution or piece of advice on some ideas I've recently had)...
First of all, I'd like to share with you some points of disagreement I'm having with the way the information about the cast and crew of the 2001 Televisa telenovela "El Manantial" has been arranged. First of all, according to the official opening theme, only Mónica Miguel and Adriana Barraza were in charge of the stage direction of the telenovela, while Alejandro Frutos and Alfredo Sánchez were in charge solely of the direction of the cameras (or cinematography), thus, I consider it is wrong that they be be listed as additional directors. On the other hand, Ricardo Navarrete had nothing to with the cinematography; instead, he was actually the person responsible for the set design!
Also, when it comes to the cast classification, Karyme Lozano, athough she actually played one of the main characters of the plot, in the opening theme is not classified as part of the Main cast; actually, she holds the last credit along with Jorge Poza (I've sometimes even thought that, in this case, Carla Estrada and her creative team were heavily influenced by the opening theme of "Cañveral de pasiones", a telenovela with similar themes and by the same writers, where the last credit was given to Azela Robinson along Roberto Ballesteros, who despite playing key roles to the plot, were granted this special "honorary mention" by the producers of said telenovela).
What's more, the article mentions Carlos Páramo as the incidental music composer, but this is only the case of the DVD version, in reality, the official version of "El Manantial" (the one televised) was musicalized mainly with tracks composed by Jorge Avendaño and Roberto Roffiel and to a lesser extent music by Adrián Bac, Jesús Blanco (who has also been the music programmer for the series) and Raúl Elizalde Olmedo was used, apart from some extra musical themes by Alberto Chávez and Daniela Romo herself that musicalized particular moments of the telenovela. Yet again, none of these composers is mentioned in the opening theme, apart from Jesús Blanco, who is credited as "Music Programmer" (musicalizador) and not as composer... And yet I would say thet his name could remain in the article (I mean, it would be the only one I would leave as it is, since he appears in the opening theme), but Carlos Páramo's should definitely get removed, unless it is clarified that we're talking about the DVD version of the telenovela.
Finally, the article in English includes Julio Abreu as part of the editing crew (I guess, based on inforation provided by IMDB), while the opening theme only credits Juan Franco and Luis Horacio Valdés. Also, concerning the character's names, at the time of the telenovela's release Televisa used to present its shows character's only by their first name, omitting their paternal or maternal surnames, although in the telenovela they might be mentioned more than once. I was wondering if you would agree with this idea of mine...
The other subject I wanted to talk to you about has to do with the Awards and Nominations section of the 2003 telenovela "Amor real"... The matter here is that, in my humble opnion, I think that that telenovela's awards have been actually too many (or maybe its coverage by the press at the time was enormous due to its popularity, getting much more coverage than other shows of the same period)... So, I was thinking that in order for the article referring to the show itself not to look extremely overloaded, it might be a good idea to create a separate page in Wkipedia that would include all the awards and nominations garnered by said telenovela apart from a brief synopsis of the plot and a quick mention to the main protagonists of the show; actually, my original thought was to leave only the awards and nominations that "Amor real" achieved in the 2004 TVyNovelas awards and add a link directing to a separate article addressed to any reader interested in learning more about the other awards and nominations garnered by the production...
The problem is I'm not sure if an article like this would be supported and, above all, I have no idea how I should start creating it, in any case... I mean, I've seen, for example, that in Wikipedia articles about cinematic production (egthe movie "Titanic" by James Cameron) it is usually done (there is a main article referring to the film, its cast, production history, etc.), then a brief reference to the most prmoinent awards and nominations (eg. the Academy Awards) and then a separate link that includes all other awards and nominations... Although, I don't know if in the case of a show like "Amor real" this would be appropriate in the English version of the encyclopedia. If yes, then from where would you advise me to start and it what way should I work? Could collaborate in something like this, if you have th time or interest to do so, or do you think it is fine as it is?
The third topic I wanted to talk about were some recent edits I made on the article concerning the 2004 telenovela "Rubí" produced by José Alberto Castro... What I did was that I edited the character's names citing the official site by Televisa, where the characters were presented solely by their first name or, in some cases, by their surname... I really think the way Televisa presents the characters in its site also has to do with the way they are adressed at most of the time during the show. Also it gives the article a certain uniformity... By saying that, I mean, for example, that the fact that in Alejandro and Sonia's wedding, the screenwriter has decided to add Alejandro's maternal surname (supposedly being Ruiz), this doesn't mean that in any chapter of the series his mother, played by Olivia Bucio, is ever refered to as "Carla Ruiz de Cárdenas"... On the other hand, taking into account that Ana Bertha Espín's character does not have biological children of her own in the show, her maiden name is never mentioned... So why would one character's surname get included and the other one's wouldn't? While, if we adhere to the way the official site presents the characters, as well as does the official opening theme, those little "misunderstandings" are prevented... It's the same I'd like to do with "El Manantial"'s characters, actually... Follow the way they are credited in the official opening theme and in the official site (although in "El Manantial"s case this can't be found anymore, ha-ha! Yet, the opening theme does exist).
So, what do you think of what I've shared with you today?
Thanks a lot for your attention as always and wish you the best, my friend! Have a nice day! <3 Nick Bizer (talk) 15:00, 24 May 2026 (UTC)
Turkish Series broadcast by Telemundo
Hey! I was wondering why the Telemundo series template was on the Turkish series that Telemundo broadcast called: Poder y traición when Telemundo only broadcast it. Not produce it. ArchiveSignal33 (talk) 19:25, 3 June 2026 (UTC)
:@ArchiveSignal33 Poder y traición / Yalı Çapkını ↗ is not included on :Template:Telemundo shows ↗ (for original productions) nor is it on the page itself.
:However, it is included on the :Template:Telemundo programming (current and upcoming) ↗ as it is the template for programs and series/telenovelas airing on the network. Telenovelafan215 (talk) 19:35, 3 June 2026 (UTC)
::oh so the other template with the original series is what Telemundo made correct? ArchiveSignal33 (talk) 19:51, 3 June 2026 (UTC)
::::Template:Telemundo shows ↗ is for scripted series originally produced by Telemundo.
::::Template:Telemundo programming (current and upcoming) ↗ is for programs airing on the channel itself, including original and acquired programs. Telenovelafan215 (talk) 20:06, 3 June 2026 (UTC)
::::Oh alright thanks for letting me know! Also another question. Why are there Telemundo series that Telemundo made are not on the template? Like for example, Un Amor en Pelicula ArchiveSignal33 (talk) 20:14, 3 June 2026 (UTC)
:::::Un amor de película ↗ was a series that was announced at Telemundo's 2011 upfront ↗ but was never actually produced. This happens often where not every series announced at an upfront is actually produced. For example in 2023 Telemundo announced a series titled Mujer de oro, that as of this year has yet to be produced. https://hispanicad.com/news/telemundo-nbcuniversal-2023-24-multiplatform-programming-line-up/ ↗
:::::This is why is it best to wait until a series actually begins filming to create an article/page for it. Whoever created the article for Un amor de pelicula got ahead of time and created the page solely based on an upfront announcement. They should have waited until further details were revealed or had the series began filming. Telenovelafan215 (talk) 20:40, 3 June 2026 (UTC)
::::::True. I am also finding some of those TV series from the websitr that you linked, about Telemundo ↗ have produced/created and I have made an article called: Los Teens ↗ about a teenage series that Telemundo ↗ with Caracol TV ↗ produced ArchiveSignal33 (talk) 23:16, 3 June 2026 (UTC)
June 2026
<div class="user-block" style="padding: 5px; margin-bottom: 0.5em; border: 1px solid var(--border-color-base, #a2ab91); background-color: var(--background-color-warning-subtle, #fef6e7); color:inherit; min-height: 40px">40px|left|alt=Stop icon with clock ↗<div style="margin-left:45px">You have been '''blocked ↗''' from editing for a period of '''48 hours''' for edit warring ↗. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions ↗. </div><div style="margin-left:45px">During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes ↗ and seek consensus ↗. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution ↗, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection ↗.</div><div style="margin-left:45px">If you believe that there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks ↗, then submit a request through the unblock wizard ↗ or through <span class="plainlinks">[{{fullurl:Special:MyTalk|action=edit§ion=new&editintro=Template:Unblock/editintro&preloadtitle=Unblock+request&preload=Template:Unblock/preload&preloadparams%5b%5d=}} your talk page]</span>. Daniel Case (talk) 22:21, 5 June 2026 (UTC)</div></div><!-- Template:uw-ewblock -->
:Hello @Daniel Case. In which article did the edit warring take place? One was not linked and I would like to know before I appeal the block. Thanks. Telenovelafan215 (talk) 22:27, 5 June 2026 (UTC)
::Esmeralda Pimentel ↗. There's no requirement that we tell you which article ... usually people understand that. Daniel Case (talk) 22:29, 5 June 2026 (UTC)
Introduction to contentious topics
{{ivmbox | image = Commons-emblem-notice.svg |imagesize=50px | bg = #E5F8FF | text = You have recently edited a page related to ''' living or recently deceased subjects of biographical content on Wikipedia articles''', a topic designated as '''''contentious ↗'''''. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and <em>does <strong>not</strong> imply that there are any issues with your editing</em>.
A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as ''contentious topics''. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee ↗. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia's norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators ↗ have an expanded level of powers and discretion in order to reduce disruption to the project.
Within contentious topics, editors should edit <strong>carefully and constructively</strong>, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:
- adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia ↗;
- comply with all applicable policies and guidelines ↗;
- follow editorial and behavioural best practices;
- comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
- refrain from gaming the system ↗.
<p>Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics <em>procedures</em>, you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard ↗ or you may learn more about this contentious topic ↗. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{tl|Ctopics/aware}} template. </p>}}<!-- Derived from Template:Contentious topics/alert/first --> Daniel Case (talk) 22:26, 5 June 2026 (UTC)
Unblock request
{{Unblock reviewed|reason=I was blocked for edit warring on Esmeralda Pimentel ↗ with temporary accounts over the nationality of the actress and which one is to be used per MOS:CONTEXTBIO ↗, as she was born in the United States but most of her career has been in Mexico and she grew up there. The block is no longer necessary as the issue has been resolved. Furthermore, I will no longer edit the page, not even to revert obvious vandalism or addition of unsourced content. Telenovelafan215 (talk) 22:49, 5 June 2026 (UTC)|accept=I will remove the block as you seem to be saying there is no risk of edit warring on that article any longer. I do suggest you review how to resolve content disputes ↗ without edit warring, for future reference. Courtesy ping to {{u|Daniel Case}}. 331dot (talk) 08:28, 6 June 2026 (UTC)}}
Temporary account IP viewer granted
right|80px|alt=The temporary account IP viewer logo, composed of the Wikipedia globe with a user and an IP address ↗
Hello, Telenovelafan215. Per your request, your account has been <span class="plainlinks">granted ↗</span> {{mono|temporary-account-viewer}} rights. You are now able to reveal the IP addresses of individuals using temporary accounts ↗ that are not visible to the general public. This is very sensitive information that is <strong>only</strong> to be used to aid in anti-abuse workflows. Please take a moment to review Wikipedia:Temporary account IP viewer ↗ for more information on this user right. It is important to remember:
- You must not share IP address data with someone who does not have the same access permissions unless disclosure is permissible as per guidelines listed at Foundation:Policy:Wikimedia Access to Temporary Account IP Addresses Policy ↗.
- Access <strong>must not</strong> be used for political control, to apply pressure on editors, or as a threat against another editor in a content dispute. There must be a valid reason to investigate a temporary user. Note that using multiple temporary accounts is not forbidden, so long as they are not used in violation of policies (for example, block or ban evasion).
- When a user accepts the preference that enables or disables IP reveal for their account.
- Revealing an IP address of a temporary account.
- Listing the temporary accounts that are associated with one or more IP address ↗es (using the CIDR notation ↗ format).
Telemundo Series Template
Hello @Telenovelafan215!
I wanna thank you for contributing to the following articles that I made:
El Señor de los Cielos season 2 ↗ and El Señor de los Cielos season 3 ↗
Thanks for adding your contribution to those articles! Now my question to you is if I can like edit Template:Telemundo shows ↗ making a new section of the template for miniseries so it doesn’t get too confusing with the telenovelas with longer episodes like Corazon valiente ↗?
let me know and thanks for your hard work!
~ ArchiveSignal33 (talk) 13:41, 10 June 2026 (UTC)
:I don't think a new section is required, since the template already includes miniseries, organized by their premiere year. Telenovelafan215 (talk) 15:18, 10 June 2026 (UTC)
::So, it doesn’t need to have a new section of the template called Miniseries? Also, Telemundo might make a film for Christmas so, does that count as a series or film? ArchiveSignal33 (talk) 17:15, 10 June 2026 (UTC)
:::I don't think it needs a new section. As for the potential Christmas film it would be considered a film. Telenovelafan215 (talk) 22:34, 10 June 2026 (UTC)
::::Oh. So, because it will be made by Telemundo ↗ would it go to the film section? ArchiveSignal33 (talk) 22:41, 10 June 2026 (UTC)
:::::Yes it would go in a film section. Telenovelafan215 (talk) 03:10, 11 June 2026 (UTC)
::::::Alright thanks! Also, can you check Sin senos sí hay paraíso season 4 ↗ to make sure that all info is correct, because there was a violent attack during filming of the series ArchiveSignal33 (talk) 12:19, 11 June 2026 (UTC)
Violetta page
hello. Can you please do me a favor leave the cast information that way? I think it's more easy for people to read it like this. Thank you ~2026-35697-35 ↗ (talk) 18:38, 18 June 2026 (UTC)
:You did not use the edit summary to explain your edits. Additionally you have no power to block users and should not threaten to block users as you did here: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Violetta_(TV_series)&diff=prev&oldid=1360015866 ↗. Instead of using the edit summary to threaten users you should use it to explain your edits. Please review Principles of Wikipedia etiquette ↗. Telenovelafan215 (talk) 18:50, 18 June 2026 (UTC)
::it was not a threat at all it was just a consistency. You are very rude and i spoke to you very kindly to let the page the way I did. I'm sure even if I explained the reason I changed it you would destroy my work again. Im sorry but I can't continue speaking with toxic people. Have a nice summer ~2026-35697-35 ↗ (talk) 18:54, 18 June 2026 (UTC)