User Talk: The Blue Rider

Server-side rendered snapshot of this editor's Wikipedia talk page discussions.

__NOTOC__

<div style="display: block; border: 1px solid #4e6376; vertical-align: top; background: #f5f7fb; color: black; margin-bottom: 10px; padding: 1em; margin-top: 0em; padding-top: .3em;">

{|cellpadding="1" cellspacing="2" style="width: 100%; vertical-align: top;"
| colspan="2" style="padding: 0;" |
|-
| style="width: 100%; vertical-align: top;" |
{| style="width:100%; height:336px; margin-bottom:.5em; font-size:100%; text-align:left; padding:-2px; background:none" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"
| rowspan="1" width="100%" colspan="2" valign="top" style="border-bottom:0; border-top:0; padding:0; padding-right:1em; margin:0" |
<div style="padding:10px; text-align: justify;">

<gallery mode="packed" heights="295px">
File:1900 Petersen-Angeln Segelschiff im Flensburger Hafen anagoria.JPG
File:Franz Roubaud Tscherkessische Reiter an einem Fluss.jpg
</gallery>
|}
|}

__TOC__


{{User QAIbox
|title=
|image=File:Antônio Parreiras - A prece.jpg
|normal='''Archives''': 1 2 3 4
}}

Your nomination of José Vicente Barbosa du Bocage ↗ is under review

Your good article nomination ↗ of the article José Vicente Barbosa du Bocage ↗ is 20px|alt=|link= ↗ '''under review'''. See Talk:José Vicente Barbosa du Bocage/GA1{{!}}the review page ↗ for more information. This may take up to 7 days; feel free to contact the reviewer with any questions you might have.  Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Giantflightlessbirds -- Giantflightlessbirds (talk) 01:04, 4 September 2025 (UTC)

BPD

Hey I see your doing some significant work on the BPD page, which is great to see, it definitely needs some work. I thought I would just reach out directly here instead of the articles talk page because the talk page does tend to get quite cluttered. I just wanted to give some feedback on your recent edits as I'm assuming that based on the rework you did, you're looking to improve the page more in the future.

There is some overly technical wording in some of your recent additions, the audience for such a well known mental ilness is going to be mostly laypeople so I think phrases such as {{tq|emotional granularity, negative affect, non-acceptance of emotional responses, emotional clarity, and adaptive coping strategies}} may be overly technical. Even as someone who has studied this topic area extensively I still feel like this wording requires me to brush up on my terminology. Some of these terms may benefit from being glossed. I don't know how much you've edited in Med and psych areas but the best practice for this is to expain the term in simple words then put the technical term in brackets (see WP:MTAU ↗). for example:

{{tq|the tendency to experience negative emotions (negative affectivity ↗)}} and so forth.

The other thing I noticed is that you're using a lot of older sources. This isn't as big of a deal as the text you replaced also used older sources but especially with med/psych it's helpful to aim to use the most recent reliable sources so that they don't have to be updated/replaced as often. If you don't have access to newer sources I'd be more than happy to download some pretty comprehensive recent ones and send you pdfs through email as I know getting access to recent sources can be tricky.

I hope this didn't come off as overly critical, I'm honestly just happy to see someone devoting some time to this particular article since it does need some love. '''Intentionally''''''Dense''' (''Contribs'' ↗) 03:54, 6 September 2025 (UTC)
:{{u|IntentionallyDense}}, hey, thank you for the feedback. I was precisely wondering, not too long ago, how I could rephrase some of the more technical terms and I will be doing some copyedits in that direction soon. Regarding the sources, my main focus was more about replacing the content, but I will definitely look for more recent papers; that's also why I put the template, so users know it's not final. Many thanks, '''The Blue Rider''' 04:57, 6 September 2025 (UTC)

Women in Green's 9th Edit-a-thon

<div style="border: 6px solid #2bbf08; background: #FFF; background-color:#FFFFFF; padding: 1ex 1ex 1ex 1.5ex; margin: 0px 0px 1em 1em; font-size: 99%">
100px|right ↗
Hello The Blue Rider:

'''WikiProject Women in Green ↗''' is holding a '''month-long Good Article Editathon event in October 2025 ↗'''! 
Running from October 1 to 31, 2025, WikiProject Women in Green (WiG) is hosting a Good Article (GA) editathon event with the theme '''What Women Do'''! All experience levels welcome. Never worked on a GA project before? We'll teach you how to get started. Or maybe you're an old hand at GAs – we'd love to have you involved! Participants are invited to work on nominating and/or reviewing GA submissions related to women and women's works (e.g., books, films) during the event period. We hope to collectively cover article subjects from at least '''31 different occupations or professions''' (or broader roles in society) by month's end. GA resources and one-on-one support will be provided by experienced GA editors, and participants will have the opportunity to earn a special WiG barnstar for their efforts.

We hope to see you there!

Grnrchst (talk), Spookyaki (talk) & Alanna the Brave (talk)

{{small|You are receiving this message as a member of the WikiProject Women in Green ↗. You can remove yourself from receiving notifications here ↗.}}
</div>
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:38, 17 September 2025 (UTC)

Your nomination of Daniela Melchior ↗ is under review

Your good article nomination ↗ of the article Daniela Melchior ↗ is 20px|alt=|link= ↗ '''under review'''. See Talk:Daniela Melchior/GA1{{!}}the review page ↗ for more information. This may take up to 7 days; feel free to contact the reviewer with any questions you might have.  Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Simongraham -- Simongraham (talk) 22:42, 2 October 2025 (UTC)

Your nomination of The Blue Rider (Kandinsky) ↗ is under review

Your good article nomination ↗ of the article The Blue Rider (Kandinsky) ↗ is 20px|alt=|link= ↗ '''under review'''. See Talk:The Blue Rider (Kandinsky)/GA1{{!}}the review page ↗ for more information. This may take up to 7 days; feel free to contact the reviewer with any questions you might have.  Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Chiswick Chap -- Chiswick Chap (talk) 20:45, 3 October 2025 (UTC)

Your nomination of Daniela Melchior ↗ is on hold

Your good article nomination ↗ of the article Daniela Melchior ↗ has been placed 20px|alt=|link= ↗ '''on hold''', as the article needs some changes. See Talk:Daniela Melchior/GA1{{!}}the review page ↗ for more information. If these are addressed within 7 days, the nomination will pass; otherwise, it may fail.  Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Simongraham -- Simongraham (talk) 21:25, 4 October 2025 (UTC)

Your nomination of Tamara Bunke ↗ is under review

Your good article nomination ↗ of the article Tamara Bunke ↗ is 20px|alt=|link= ↗ '''under review'''. See Talk:Tamara Bunke/GA1{{!}}the review page ↗ for more information. This may take up to 7 days; feel free to contact the reviewer with any questions you might have.  Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Easternsahara -- Easternsahara (talk) 22:28, 5 October 2025 (UTC)

Your nomination of The Blue Rider (Kandinsky) ↗ is on hold

Your good article nomination ↗ of the article The Blue Rider (Kandinsky) ↗ has been placed 20px|alt=|link= ↗ '''on hold''', as the article needs some changes. See Talk:The Blue Rider (Kandinsky)/GA1{{!}}the review page ↗ for more information. If these are addressed within 7 days, the nomination will pass; otherwise, it may fail.  Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Chiswick Chap -- Chiswick Chap (talk) 16:04, 6 October 2025 (UTC)

Your nomination of Daniela Melchior ↗ has passed

Your good article nomination ↗ of the article Daniela Melchior ↗ has 20px|alt=|link= ↗ '''passed'''; congratulations! See Talk:Daniela Melchior/GA1{{!}}the review page ↗ for more information. If the article is eligible to appear ↗ in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it ↗ within the next seven days.  Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Simongraham -- Simongraham (talk) 22:47, 18 October 2025 (UTC)

FA review of Political philosophy

Hi {{u|The Blue Rider}} and thanks for your GA review of the article Political philosophy ↗ a while back. I've nominated the article for FA status but the nomination hasn't attracted much attention so far. I was wondering whether you might be interested in providing some feedback at Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Political philosophy/archive1 ↗. Thank you for taking a look and please feel under no obligation if now is not a good time. Phlsph7 (talk) 16:54, 21 October 2025 (UTC)
: Sure, I think I can do that. '''The Blue Rider''' 17:02, 21 October 2025 (UTC)

Your nomination of The Blue Rider (Kandinsky) ↗ has passed

Your good article nomination ↗ of the article The Blue Rider (Kandinsky) ↗ has 20px|alt=|link= ↗ '''passed'''; congratulations! See Talk:The Blue Rider (Kandinsky)/GA1{{!}}the review page ↗ for more information. If the article is eligible to appear ↗ in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it ↗ within the next seven days.  Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Chiswick Chap -- Chiswick Chap (talk) 16:04, 26 October 2025 (UTC)

:The two citations to Vezin 2024 don't point to any source at the moment. Chiswick Chap (talk) 18:17, 11 November 2025 (UTC)
:: Fixed the ISBN. '''The Blue Rider''' 11:27, 12 November 2025 (UTC)

Women in Green - October 2025 Barnstar

{| style="border: 2px solid green; background-color: #FFFFF0; vertical-align: middle; padding:10px;"
|rowspan="2" | 100px ↗
|rowspan="2" |
|style="font-size: x-large; vertical-align: middle; height: 1.1em;" |'''Women in Green Editathon October '25'''
|-
|This barnstar is given in recognition of your contributions to Women in Green ↗'s October 2025 "What Women Do" ↗ Good Article Editathon! Together, we nominated 27 Good Articles and conducted 19 GA reviews. We exceeded our goal, addressing 34 different occupations. Thank you for improving the quality of Wikipedia's coverage of women! ~ L 🌸 (talk) 23:30, 12 November 2025 (UTC)
|}

ArbCom 2025 Elections voter message

<div class="ivmbox " style="margin-bottom: 1em; border: 1px solid #a2a9b1; background-color: #fdf2d5; padding: 0.5em; display: flex; align-items: center; ">
<div class="ivmbox-image" style="padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em;flex-basis: 40px">40px ↗</div>
<div class="ivmbox-text">
Hello! Voting in the '''2025 Arbitration Committee elections ↗''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2025|end}}-1 day}}. All '''eligible users ↗''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee ↗ is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process ↗. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans ↗, topic bans ↗, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy ↗ describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please review the candidates ↗ and submit your choices on the '''2025|poll}}|voting page ↗'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:54, 18 November 2025 (UTC)

</div>
</div>

GA2 review of Daniela Lalita [Women in Green | Good Article Edit-a-thon]

Hi {{u|The Blue Rider}} and thanks for your GA review of the article Daniela Lalita ↗. Your comments were very helpful in improving it. Since then, I have thoroughly checked all statements in the text against the sources, added new sources, and removed older, less reliable ones. I have implemented all the specific suggestions for improvement. The proofreading by WP:GUILD is now complete, and the resulting shortening should make the article more readable. You suggested to ping you to have a second look. Thank you if you have the time. ◉'''wwwWiki'''◉ 04:07, 27 November 2025 (UTC)

:Thank you for the ping. I will absolutely have a second look! '''The Blue Rider''' 10:16, 27 November 2025 (UTC)

::Hi {{u|The Blue Rider}}, I hope you're doing well. I just wanted to politely check in and ask whether you might have time to continue the GAN review for Daniela Lalita ↗. If you don't have the capacity, that's completely fine. In that case I may look for another reviewer to take over the review. Thank you very much for the feedback you've already provided! ◉'''wwwWiki'''◉ 19:39, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
:::I will continue the review tomorrow, thank you for your patience. '''The Blue Rider''' 21:25, 6 December 2025 (UTC)

DYK for Daniela Melchior

{{ivmbox
|image = Updated DYK query.svg
|imagesize=40px
|text = On 7 December 2025 ↗, '''Did you know ↗''' was updated with a fact from the article '''''Daniela Melchior ↗''''', which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ''... that '''Daniela Melchior ↗''' ''(pictured)'' once did a chemistry screen test with fancy rats?'' The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Daniela Melchior ↗. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Daniela Melchior ↗), and the hook may be added to the statistics page ↗ after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to nominate it ↗.
}}  — Amakuru (talk) 00:02, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
{{DYK views|26,765|1,115.2|December 2025|Daniela Melchior}} GalliumBot (talk • contribs ↗) (he/it ↗) 03:27, 8 December 2025 (UTC)

Your nomination of José Vicente Barbosa du Bocage ↗ is under review

Your good article nomination ↗ of the article José Vicente Barbosa du Bocage ↗ is 20px|alt=|link= ↗ '''under review'''. See '''Talk:José Vicente Barbosa du Bocage/GA2{{!}}the review page ↗''' for more information. This may take up to 7 days; feel free to contact the reviewer with any questions you might have.  Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Chickenpox4dinner -- Chickenpox4dinner (talk) 19:22, 4 January 2026 (UTC)

Your nomination of José Vicente Barbosa du Bocage ↗ has passed

Your good article nomination ↗ of the article José Vicente Barbosa du Bocage ↗ has 20px|alt=|link= ↗ '''passed'''; congratulations! See '''Talk:José Vicente Barbosa du Bocage/GA2{{!}}the review page ↗''' for more information. If the article is eligible to appear ↗ in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it ↗ within the next seven days.  Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Chickenpox4dinner -- Chickenpox4dinner (talk) 21:22, 4 January 2026 (UTC)

Women in Green reviewing drive

<div style="border: 6px solid #2bbf08; background: #FFF; background-color:#FFFFFF; padding: 1ex 1ex 1ex 1.5ex; margin: 0px 0px 1em 1em; font-size: 99%">
100px|right ↗
Hello The Blue Rider:

This month, February 2026, '''WikiProject Women in Green ↗''' is participating in the February 2026 GAN Backlog Drive ↗, in which we're aiming to review as many outstanding Good Article (GA) nominations about women and women's works as possible. If you want to help out, you can check out the project talk page ↗ for a list of nominations in need of review (including some WiG originals). If you haven't reviewed a GA nomination before, be sure to check out the reviewing instructions ↗ and guidelines ↗ and feel free to ask for a mentor ↗ to check your work.

We are also working together with a wikithon hosted on 5 February by Wikimedia UK, which will focus on writing and improving articles about women involved in sustainable development. If you want to join the event, feel free to sign up at the eventbrite page ↗; or if you would be interested in providing a 20-minute assessment and/or a full GA review of the submitted articles in the weeks following, put your name down on the project talk page ↗ for updates as the event progresses.

We hope to see you there!

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:05, 3 February 2026 (UTC)
</div>

Your nomination of Tamara Bunke ↗ is under review

Your good article nomination ↗ of the article Tamara Bunke ↗ is 20px|alt=|link= ↗ '''under review'''. See '''Talk:Tamara Bunke/GA2{{!}}the review page ↗''' for more information. This may take up to 7 days; feel free to contact the reviewer with any questions you might have.  Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Zzz plant -- Zzz plant (talk) 01:02, 9 February 2026 (UTC)

Your nomination of Tamara Bunke ↗ has failed

Your good article nomination ↗ of the article Tamara Bunke ↗ has 20px|alt=|link= ↗ '''failed'''. See '''Talk:Tamara Bunke/GA2{{!}}the review page ↗''' for more information. If or when the reviewer's feedback has been addressed, you may nominate the article again.  Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Zzz plant -- Zzz plant (talk) 12:05, 11 February 2026 (UTC)

2026 Onikişubat school shooting WP:INDISCRIMINATE

Looks like other users want the section to stay Trade (talk) 12:17, 23 April 2026 (UTC)
: I did not removed the section; I did removed indiscriminate information within a section. '''The Blue Rider''' 13:38, 23 April 2026 (UTC)

June 2026 GAN Backlog Drive

{| style="border: 5px solid #ABCDEF ; background-color: #FFF; padding:10px 15px 0; color: black"
|style="padding: 0; vertical-align: middle; height: 1.1em; font-size:130%" |'''Good article nominations ↗ |''' June 2026 Backlog Drive
|rowspan=3|right|75px ↗
|-
|'''June 2026 Backlog Drive:'''
Do you want to become more experienced in the GA process?

On 1 June, a one-month backlog drive for good article nominations will begin.

Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles reviewed.

Mentors are available, and new reviewers (<6 reviews) get bonus points!

Interested in taking part? You can '''sign up here ↗'''.
|-
|colspan=2|'''Other ways to participate:'''

Join the conversations on our talk page ↗.

|-
|colspan=2 style="font-size:85%; padding-top:15px;"|You're receiving this message because you have participated in a good article review this year or participated in the previous backlog drive.
|}

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:59, 25 May 2026 (UTC)

Your nomination of Tamara Bunke ↗ is under review

Your good article nomination ↗ of the article Tamara Bunke ↗ is 20px|alt=|link= ↗ '''under review'''. See '''Talk:Tamara Bunke/GA3{{!}}the review page ↗''' for more information. This may take up to 7 days; feel free to contact the reviewer with any questions you might have.  Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Chao Garden -- Chao Garden (talk) 06:26, 1 June 2026 (UTC)

Your nomination of Tamara Bunke ↗ is on hold

Your good article nomination ↗ of the article Tamara Bunke ↗ has been placed 20px|alt=|link= ↗ '''on hold''', as the article needs some changes. See '''Talk:Tamara Bunke/GA3{{!}}the review page ↗''' for more information. If these are addressed within 7 days, the nomination will pass; otherwise, it may fail.  Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Chao Garden -- Chao Garden (talk) 02:25, 4 June 2026 (UTC)

ANI notice

link=|25px|alt=Information icon ↗ There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents ↗ regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is User:The Blue Rider - deleting GA review comments and hounding ↗. — Chao Garden 🌱 ~ say hello 22:19, 17 June 2026 (UTC)

A cup of coffee for you!

{| style="background-color: var(--background-color-success-subtle, #fdffe7); border: 1px solid var(--border-color-success, #fceb92); color: var(--color-base, #202122);"
|style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 5px;" | 120px ↗
|style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;" | Hey, saw the ANI report. Not sure what's going on with it, but I hope it is resolved smoothly. Just coming by to nudge you to avoid profanity when the target of even a bad report. It doesn't make you look good to third parties, regardless of how right or wrong that is. Don't want to see something small escalate over word choice. GeogSage (⚔Chat?⚔) 23:00, 17 June 2026 (UTC)
|}

:Thanks for the heads-up. I think my reply was very mild, but I will be even more careful. '''The Blue Rider''' 23:23, 17 June 2026 (UTC)

June 2026

<div class="user-block" style="padding: 5px; margin-bottom: 0.5em; border: 1px solid var(--border-color-base, #a2ab91); background-color: var(--background-color-warning-subtle, #fef6e7); color:inherit; min-height: 40px">40px|left|alt=Stop icon ↗<div style="margin-left:45px">You have been '''blocked indefinitely ↗''' from editing because your recent edits appear to be disruptive ↗. Please note that this is not necessarily an assessment of faith or character, and we welcome good faith edits ↗ that are also constructive and in line with our policies ↗. </div><div style="margin-left:45px">If you believe that there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks ↗, then submit a request through the unblock wizard ↗ or through [{{fullurl:Special:MyTalk|action=edit&section=new&editintro=Template:Unblock/editintro&preloadtitle=Unblock+request&preload=Template:Unblock/preload&preloadparams%5b%5d=}} your talk page].  SarekOfVulcan (talk) 01:15, 18 June 2026 (UTC)</div></div>

:No way I am permantly blocked on the grounds of disruptive editing. Crazy. '''The Blue Rider''' 01:23, 18 June 2026 (UTC)
::{{u|SarekOfVulcan}} care to clarify what was my disruptive editing? '''The Blue Rider''' 01:24, 18 June 2026 (UTC)
:::Well, it seems like my block is "strongly endorsed" by other admin. I thought by focusing on GA I would be free of any trouble, seems like I was wrong. I shall take the standard offer and then vanish. Would I also need to be unblocked from the Portuguese Wikipedia in order to vanish? '''The Blue Rider''' 01:52, 18 June 2026 (UTC)
::::The WP:STANDARDOFFER ↗ is for returning to editing. It is highly unlikely you would be unblocked for the sole purpose of vanishing, as your account would have no chance to become not in bad standing. - The Bushranger One ping only 02:07, 18 June 2026 (UTC)
::::: Noted, thank you. '''The Blue Rider''' 19:13, 19 June 2026 (UTC)
:I'm sorry to see this. I'm not sure if this is related to your mental health, but this feels just like the last time you were blocked (also over a Tamara-related GA nom). I think you can continue to be a good contributor here, but you need to address how you deal with constructive criticism before returning and have a plan for preventing things from going south. voorts (talk/contributions ↗) 17:17, 18 June 2026 (UTC)
::Thank you for your words. My behaviour is most likely due to my ASPD ↗ indeed; and there is no (golden-child) treatment for it. I do have various plans, but it is a different story actually applying them when I need it. '''The Blue Rider''' 17:55, 18 June 2026 (UTC)

Your nomination of Tamara Bunke ↗ has failed

Your good article nomination ↗ of the article Tamara Bunke ↗ has 20px|alt=|link= ↗ '''failed'''. See '''Talk:Tamara Bunke/GA3{{!}}the review page ↗''' for more information. If or when the reviewer's feedback has been addressed, you may nominate the article again.  Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Chao Garden -- Chao Garden (talk) 03:26, 18 June 2026 (UTC)

WP:GRAVEDANCING ↗

{{u|Gnomingstuff}} makes a baseless and serious acussation at WP:AIN ↗ that a LLM was used by me to rewrite some parts of the article Love ↗ back in 2024. The simple use of certain adjectives does not translate to 1) it was written by a LLM, 2) it is a bad edit. {{u|sapphaline}} sees the AIN and reverts all edits since 2024 to a version where the previously rewritten part is mostly unsourced. Gnomingstuff noted on their report that I was blocked for no good reason, which needlesly signals to other users that my edits are bad; this most likely prompted the erronous revertion by sapphaline. '''The Blue Rider''' 09:09, 26 June 2026 (UTC)
:Cleaning up after a blocked problematic user isn't "gravedancing". sapphaline ↗ (talk ↗) 09:19, 26 June 2026 (UTC)
:: Thank you for confirming that you were indeed operating under gravedancing assumptions. '''The Blue Rider''' 09:21, 26 June 2026 (UTC)
:I would also suggest you to see Wikipedia:Help, I've been accused of AI! ↗, and directly ("yes" or "no") answer the question whether you used LLMs or not. sapphaline ↗ (talk ↗) 09:29, 26 June 2026 (UTC)
::I would also suggest you to understand 1) my block is due to behavioural problems, that is, not content creation, 2) reverting hundreds of revisions by multiple users in a time-span of 2 years is not acceptable, 3) using the fact that I am blocked to revert all my 65 edits on an article is gravedancing, 4) the revision you restored is mostly unsourced, 5) I did not use a LLM, if it was not already clear by me raising this issue. '''The Blue Rider''' 09:36, 26 June 2026 (UTC)

User Talk: The Blue Rider

Your nomination of José Vicente Barbosa du Bocage ↗ is under review

BPD

Women in Green's 9th Edit-a-thon

Your nomination of Daniela Melchior ↗ is under review

Your nomination of The Blue Rider (Kandinsky) ↗ is under review

Your nomination of Daniela Melchior ↗ is on hold

Your nomination of Tamara Bunke ↗ is under review

Your nomination of The Blue Rider (Kandinsky) ↗ is on hold

Your nomination of Daniela Melchior ↗ has passed

FA review of Political philosophy

Your nomination of The Blue Rider (Kandinsky) ↗ has passed

Women in Green - October 2025 Barnstar

ArbCom 2025 Elections voter message

GA2 review of Daniela Lalita <small>[Women in Green | Good Article Edit-a-thon]</small>

DYK for Daniela Melchior

Your nomination of José Vicente Barbosa du Bocage ↗ is under review

Your nomination of José Vicente Barbosa du Bocage ↗ has passed

Women in Green reviewing drive

Your nomination of Tamara Bunke ↗ is under review

Your nomination of Tamara Bunke ↗ has failed

2026 Onikişubat school shooting WP:INDISCRIMINATE

June 2026 GAN Backlog Drive

Your nomination of Tamara Bunke ↗ is under review

Your nomination of Tamara Bunke ↗ is on hold

ANI notice

A cup of coffee for you!

June 2026

Your nomination of Tamara Bunke ↗ has failed

WP:GRAVEDANCING ↗