User Talk: Phlsph7

Server-side rendered snapshot of this editor's Wikipedia talk page discussions.

old archive: User_talk:Phlsph7/Archive_1 ↗
{{User:ClueBot III/ArchiveThis|archiveprefix=User talk:Phlsph7/Archives/|format=Y/F|age=2160|archivebox=yes|box-advert=yes}}

Wikipedia:Destubathon of the Americas ↗

You are invited to participate in the '''Destubathon of the Americas ↗''', a contest/editathon which will run from May 1 to May 31. The goal is to destub as many of our 475,000+ stubs for the Americas (from Alaska down to Chile) as possible. A good chance to have fun in expanding many of our old stale stubs and win up to £2000 ($2680) in Amazon vouchers for expanding stub articles. Sign up in the Contestants/participants section on the contest page if interested. Even if not interested in prizes you are still warmly welcome to participate in it as an editathon! Hopefully we can achieve something significant in the month of May together! ♦ ''Dr. Blofeld'' 17:26, 15 April 2026 (UTC)

Principle of bivalence

A lot of the articles on logic are a mix of technicians above my pay grade, and fake news from memes Ayn Rand style. I did my best to fix the "laws of thought" article and each principle by itself. I am unclear on the differences between the principle of bivalence and the law of excluded middle. Most commentary on Aristotle's sea battle treats them as equivalent. Would you be so kind to give the bivalence article a look? '''Cake''' (talk) 16:03, 20 April 2026 (UTC)

:Hi {{u|MisterCake}}, you are right that various logic articles struggle to make their topic accessible to a general reader. As I understand it, the principle of bivalence is about the possible truth values of propositions (every proposition has either the truth value "true" or the truth value "false") and the law of excluded middle is about a tautology (all propositions of the form "P or not-P" are automatically true). For example, three-valued logics violate the principle of bivalence (some propositions have the truth value "indeterminate") and intuitionistic logics violate the law of excluded middle (the proposition "P or not-P" is not automatically true). Phlsph7 (talk) 08:38, 21 April 2026 (UTC)

::Don't intuitionistic logics have a third truth value of indeterminate or unproven?? '''Cake''' (talk) 11:18, 21 April 2026 (UTC)
:::At least not the standard version. One way to understand intuitionistic logic is to see it as a classical logic with fewer rules of inference. Because some rules of inference are missing, there are certain things you can prove in classical logic but not in intuitionistic logic. For example, you can't infer P from not-not-P in intuitionistic logic. Phlsph7 (talk) 13:30, 21 April 2026 (UTC)
::::I thought not-not-P doesn't entail P ''because'' there are three truth values. If there is P, not-P, and a third, then not-not P is either P or a third option. I guess I am lost as to how a truth value gap is not a violation of the law of excluded middle. That is how Aristotle's sea battle is often expressed in the literature. Wiki seems to say it isn't. For example, "Cooper, Neil. “The Law of Excluded Middle.” Mind 87, no. 346 (1978): 161–80. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2253416." seems to disagree. '''Cake''' (talk) 10:44, 22 April 2026 (UTC)
:::::A.I. has told me bivalence entails LEM, but LEM doesnt necessarily entail bivalence. That first part fits what I have read. For instance, I have heard it said Aristotle's denial of bivalence entails a denial of excluded middle. It seems to me, due to the meme that Aristotle did the "3 laws of logic" wiki tried to previously say he denied bivalence but not excluded middle, as if a third truth value isn't the middle being excluded. '''Cake''' (talk) 14:10, 24 April 2026 (UTC)
::::::For a different opinion, see https://philarchive.org/archive/RAAILA ↗: {{green|There is certainly a close connection between LEM and PB, but they are not trivially equivalent. There are logical systems (e.g. certain many-valued logics and supervaluational languages) in which LEM is valid but PB does not hold, and vice versa (see e.g. van Fraasen 1966, Day 1992, DeVidi & Solomon 1999).}}
::::::The two principles are not always clearly distinguished in reliable sources, which makes understanding the difference more difficult. Phlsph7 (talk) 16:48, 24 April 2026 (UTC)

April TFA

{{User QAIbox
| image = Oberauroff, purple dragon.jpg
| image_upright = 0.9
| bold = story · music · places
}}
Thank you today for Nihilism ↗, introduced as "a family of views that reject certain aspects of existence, including the ideas that life is meaningless, that moral values are baseless, and that knowledge is impossible. The article is a level-4 vital article with over 1.2 million page views last year"! - Gerda Arendt (talk) 06:14, 22 April 2026 (UTC)

Today's story is about one of three bios I brought to today's main page: look and listen, an extraordinary woman in many respects. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 20:01, 30 April 2026 (UTC)

The 2026 Core Contest has begun!

The Core Contest ↗ has begun! You have until May 31 (23:59 UTC) to make eligible changes. Although you are most welcome (and encouraged) to continue working on the article, changes after May 31 will not be considered for rankings or prizes.

We are now about a week in, and it's worth sharing some issues we judges have noticed in the past:

'''Understandability ↗''' is extra important for big topics like these. Avoid jargon ↗ when possible; give context (and of course, citations), even for things that seem obvious ↗; and always consider the age-old adage from {{noping|Iridescent}}: ''"would a bright 14-year old with no prior knowledge of the topic understand this?"''

'''The source, the whole source, and nothing but the source.''' Instead of asking "what do I want to say in this article", ask yourself: "what do most high-quality, reliable and recent sources say about this topic?"

Take a '''global perspective ↗''' whenever possible. If you're writing about someone from France, consider looking at recent, high-quality sources in French. Amid language barriers, consider the careful use of an online translation tool or *shudder* a language dictionary.

'''Plan, plan, plan!''' Make an outline, a draft TOC, or some kind of gameplan. Big articles are a different beast, and it's worth figuring out structural and logistical aspects early on.

Cheers from the judges, Femke, Casliber, Aza24. – '''Aza24 (talk)''' 00:08, 24 April 2026 (UTC)

If you wish to start or stop receiving news about The Core Contest, please add or remove yourself from the delivery list ↗.

New pages patrol May 2026 Backlog drive

{| style="border: 2px solid #36c; border-radius: 4px; background: linear-gradient(to right, #ffffff, #eaf3ff); padding: 10px; color: #000;"
| style="vertical-align: middle; font-size: 130%" | May 2026 Backlog Drive ↗ | '''New pages patrol ↗''' 
| rowspan=3 | right|100px ↗
|-
|

On 1 May 2026, a one-month backlog drive for New Page Patrol will begin.

Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles patrolled.

Barnstars will also be granted for re-reviewing articles previously reviewed by other patrollers during the drive.

Each review will earn 1 point.

Interested in taking part? '''Sign up here ↗'''.

|-
|colspan=2 style="font-size:85%; padding-top:15px;"|You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here. ↗
|}
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:24, 29 April 2026 (UTC)

Promotion of Cognition ↗

{{ivmbox
|image = Cscr-featured.svg
|imagesize=60px
|extracss=font-size:1.25em; font-family:Georgia;
|text = Congratulations, Phlsph7! The article you nominated, '''Cognition ↗''', has been promoted to featured status, recognizing it as one of the best articles on Wikipedia. The '''nomination discussion ↗''' has been archived.{{parabr}}This is a rare accomplishment and you should be proud. If you would like, you may nominate it ↗ to appear on the Main Page as Today's featured article. Keep up the great work! Cheers, {{user0|David Fuchs}} via FACBot (talk) 23:05, 29 April 2026 (UTC)
}}

Disambiguation link notification for May 2

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Agnosticism ↗, a link pointing to the disambiguation page Burden of proof ↗ was added.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 18:03, 2 May 2026 (UTC)

Hi

Hi Phlsph7, nice talking to you again. In return for your review to ''The Emancipation of Mimi ↗'', I'm happy to review an FAC of yours. Would dualism ↗ still need a review or would you want me to wait until your next candidate? Thanks and best, 750 h+ 13:45, 5 May 2026 (UTC)

:Hi {{u|750h+}} and thanks for the offer! Reviews are always welcome, but the dualism nomination already has several finished reviews, so it wouldn't be essential there. In case the topic Well-being ↗ interests you, this would be my next candidate in need of reviews, probably in a few days once I have finished preparations. Phlsph7 (talk) 17:05, 5 May 2026 (UTC)
:{{ping|750h+}} Alright, I started the nomination, see Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Well-being/archive1 ↗. I would be interested in your comments if you find the time. Phlsph7 (talk) 11:34, 13 May 2026 (UTC)
::Happy to ! 750 h+ 01:54, 15 May 2026 (UTC)

CS1 error on Well-being ↗

25px|alt=|link= ↗ Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have '''automatically detected''' that this edit ↗ performed by you, on the page :Well-being ↗, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A ISBN ↗ error. References show this error when the ISBN value or formatting is invalid. Please edit the article to ensure the value is correct, that only one ISBN is used, that the proper optional separators are used, and that no other text is included. ([//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Well-being&action=edit&minor=minor&summary=Fixing+reference+error+raised+by+%5B%5BUser%3AQwerfjkl%20(bot)%7CQwerfjkl%20(bot)%5D%5D Fix] | [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&preload=User:Qwerfjkl%20(bot)/helpform&preloadtitle=Referencing%20errors%20on%20%5B%5BSpecial%3ADiff%2F1353833848%7CWell-being%5D%5D Ask for help])

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive ↗, you can [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:Qwerfjkl/Botpreload&editintro=User:Qwerfjkl/Boteditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:Qwerfjkl&preloadtitle=Qwerfjkl%20(bot)%20–%20Phlsph7&section=new&preloadparams%5b%5d={{FULLPAGENAMEE:Well-being}}&preloadparams%5b%5d=1353833848 report it to my operator].
Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 17:31, 12 May 2026 (UTC)

New Page Patrol Newsletter - May 2026

<div style="border:2px solid #90C0FF; background:#F0F0FF; width:99%; padding:4px">

Hello {{BASEPAGENAME}},

thumb|400px|New Page Review queue November 2025 - May 2026 ↗

'''Backlog update'''

At the time of this message, there are 15,282 articles and 32,951 redirects awaiting review.

After the January–February drive the article backlog was reduced to 15,179 articles and the redirect backlog to 19,053 respectively. Great job! However, both queues are growing rapidly and any additional reviews are highly appreciated.

'''2024 and 2025 NPP Awards'''

74px|left ↗{{no ping|JTtheOG}} was selected as the NPP reviewer of the year for both 2024 and 2025, for reviewing the most articles amongst all reviewers.
{{no ping|Hey man im josh}} and {{no ping|MPGuy2824}} won the Redirect Ninja Master Award for 2024 and 2025 respectively, for reviewing the most redirects.

Overall in 2024, one Platinum, two Gold, eight Silver, 12 Bronze and 45 Iron Barnstars were awarded. Additionally, 66 reviewers got the NPP barnstar for doing more than 100 reviews through the year. In 2025, one Platinum, ten Silver, 13 Bronze and 38 Iron Barnstars were awarded. Additionally, 38 reviewers got the NPP barnstar for doing more than 100 reviews through the year.

{{no ping|BoyTheKingCanDance}}, {{no ping|Rosiestep}}, {{no ping|SunDawn}}, and {{no ping|Vanderwaalforces}} were inducted into the NPP Hall of Fame ↗ for having two separate years of 2,000+ article reviews.

'''January–February backlog drive'''

The experimental two-month long backlog drive concluded with 183 reviewers patrolling over 27,761 articles and 35,309 redirects, earning over 36,836 points. Congratulations to {{no ping|JTtheOG}}, who achieved first place with 6,484.6 points in this drive.

'''May backlog drive'''

An article-only backlog drive is currently underway. We are hoping to make a big dent in the backlog. You can read more about it or join at Wikipedia:New pages patrol/Backlog drives/May 2026 ↗.

'''PageTriage'''

An attempt was made to get the New Pages Feed ↗ to sort by date marked as reviewed instead of date created. However we had to revert it due to bugs. We may try again in the future. You can subscribe to the Phabricator ticket ↗ if you're interested in following along.

{{refbegin}}
'''Reminders:'''

You can access live chat with patrollers on the New Page Patrol Discord ↗.

Consider adding the project discussion page ↗ to your watchlist.

To opt out of future mailings, please remove yourself here ↗.

{{refend}}
</div>

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:38, 14 May 2026 (UTC)

Your nomination of Agnosticism ↗ is under review

Your good article nomination ↗ of the article Agnosticism ↗ is 20px|alt=|link= ↗ '''under review'''. See '''Talk:Agnosticism/GA3{{!}}the review page ↗''' for more information. This may take up to 7 days; feel free to contact the reviewer with any questions you might have.  Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Vigilantcosmicpenguin -- Vigilantcosmicpenguin (talk) 03:01, 15 May 2026 (UTC)

Your nomination of Agnosticism ↗ has passed

Your good article nomination ↗ of the article Agnosticism ↗ has 20px|alt=|link= ↗ '''passed'''; congratulations! See '''Talk:Agnosticism/GA3{{!}}the review page ↗''' for more information. If the article is eligible to appear ↗ in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it ↗ within the next seven days. Please also consider reviewing ↗ somebody else's nomination to help keep the backlog down.  Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Vigilantcosmicpenguin -- Vigilantcosmicpenguin (talk) 23:00, 19 May 2026 (UTC)

Promotion of Dualism ↗

{{ivmbox
|image = Cscr-featured.svg
|imagesize=60px
|extracss=font-size:1.25em; font-family:Georgia;
|text = Congratulations, Phlsph7! The article you nominated, '''Dualism ↗''', has been promoted to featured status, recognizing it as one of the best articles on Wikipedia. The '''nomination discussion ↗''' has been archived.{{parabr}}This is a rare accomplishment and you should be proud. If you would like, you may nominate it ↗ to appear on the Main Page as Today's featured article. Keep up the great work! Cheers, {{user0|FrB.TG}} via FACBot (talk) 23:05, 22 May 2026 (UTC)
}}

June 2026 GAN Backlog Drive

{| style="border: 5px solid #ABCDEF ; background-color: #FFF; padding:10px 15px 0; color: black"
|style="padding: 0; vertical-align: middle; height: 1.1em; font-size:130%" |'''Good article nominations ↗ |''' June 2026 Backlog Drive
|rowspan=3|right|75px ↗
|-
|'''June 2026 Backlog Drive:'''
Do you want to become more experienced in the GA process?

On 1 June, a one-month backlog drive for good article nominations will begin.

Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles reviewed.

Mentors are available, and new reviewers (<6 reviews) get bonus points!

Interested in taking part? You can '''sign up here ↗'''.
|-
|colspan=2|'''Other ways to participate:'''

Join the conversations on our talk page ↗.

|-
|colspan=2 style="font-size:85%; padding-top:15px;"|You're receiving this message because you have participated in a good article review this year or participated in the previous backlog drive.
|}

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:59, 25 May 2026 (UTC)

GA review of Truth ↗ article?

Hi. I notice you have the Truth ↗ article nominated for GA (as well as some others). I just nominated Dam ↗ for GA, and I'm looking for someone to swap reviews with. Are you interested in swapping GA reviews? I could do Truth ↗, or any other of your GA nominations. I know some editors don't like swapping GA reviews, but it is not prohibited, provided that the reviews are thorough and proper ... which is what we both want, of course. I think you and I swapped a pair of PR reviews in 2025. Schedule: I'm hoping to have the reviews done within 7 to 10 days after starting, so I can move forward towards a FA nomination. Thanks for considering it! Noleander (talk) 23:40, 25 May 2026 (UTC)

:Hi {{u|Noleander}} and thanks for the offer. Unfortunately, I'm not particularly familiar with the topic of dams or with articles on civil engineering, so I may not be the best reviewer candidate. Phlsph7 (talk) 12:06, 26 May 2026 (UTC)
::No worries. Good luck with your nominations! Noleander (talk) 13:10, 26 May 2026 (UTC)

One Week Left in The Core Contest!

Hello Core Contest participants! There is less than '''one week left''' until the May 31 deadline (23:59 UTC), so it's time to ramp up our efforts. Remember, Wikipedia wants to be edited!

Now is a good time to set some final goals for your article: What section needs the most improvement? Which sources remain unused? How can you best spend your time? Good luck and happy editing! Cheers from the judges, Femke, Casliber, Aza24. – '''Aza24 (talk)''' 19:37, 26 May 2026 (UTC)

If you wish to start or stop receiving news about The Core Contest, please add or remove yourself from the delivery list ↗.

Cognition scheduled at TFA

This is to let you know that Cognition ↗ has been scheduled as today's featured article ↗ for 15 July 2026. Please check that the article needs no amendments. Feel free to amend the draft blurb, which can be found at Wikipedia:Today's featured article/July 2026 ↗, or to make comments on other matters concerning the scheduling of this article at Wikipedia talk:Today's featured article/July 2026 ↗. Please keep an eye on that page, as notifications of copy edits to or queries about the draft blurb may be posted there. I also suggest that you watchlist Wikipedia:Main Page/Errors ↗ from two days before it appears on the Main Page. Thanks, and congratulations on your work! Z1720 (talk) 00:27, 29 May 2026 (UTC)

Your nomination of Semiotics ↗ is under review

Your good article nomination ↗ of the article Semiotics ↗ is 20px|alt=|link= ↗ '''under review'''. See '''Talk:Semiotics/GA1{{!}}the review page ↗''' for more information. This may take up to 7 days; feel free to contact the reviewer with any questions you might have.  Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Freedom4U -- Freedom4U (talk) 00:07, 1 June 2026 (UTC)

Your nomination of Truth ↗ is under review

Your good article nomination ↗ of the article Truth ↗ is 20px|alt=|link= ↗ '''under review'''. See '''Talk:Truth/GA1{{!}}the review page ↗''' for more information. This may take up to 7 days; feel free to contact the reviewer with any questions you might have.  Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of ScrubbedFalcon -- ScrubbedFalcon (talk) 08:47, 1 June 2026 (UTC)

End of the 2026 Core Contest!

The Core Contest ↗ has now ended! Thank you for your interest and efforts. Make sure that you include both a "start" and "improvement diff" on the entries ↗ page. The judges will begin delibertaing shortly and annouce the winners within the next few weeks. Cheers from the judges, Femke, Casliber, Aza24. – '''Aza24 (talk)''' 18:27, 1 June 2026 (UTC)

If you wish to start or stop receiving news about The Core Contest, please add or remove yourself from the delivery list ↗.

Re:FA review of Well-being

Thank you for the thank you! I am unfortunately going through a bit of a hard season during this time, though I will do my best to give the article a thorough reading and add comments sometime in the near future :) ★ The Green Star Collector ★ (talk) 22:05, 8 June 2026 (UTC)

:Hi {{u|The Green Star Collector}} and sorry to hear about the difficulties you are facing. Thanks for taking a look at the article, I'm looking forward to your comments. Phlsph7 (talk) 07:47, 9 June 2026 (UTC)

Your nomination of Normativity ↗ has failed

Your good article nomination ↗ of the article Normativity ↗ has 20px|alt=|link= ↗ '''failed'''. See '''Talk:Normativity/GA1{{!}}the review page ↗''' for more information. If or when the reviewer's feedback has been addressed, you may nominate the article again.  Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Z. Patterson -- Z. Patterson (talk) 03:05, 12 June 2026 (UTC)

Your nomination of Premise ↗ is under review

Your good article nomination ↗ of the article Premise ↗ is 20px|alt=|link= ↗ '''under review'''. See '''Talk:Premise/GA1{{!}}the review page ↗''' for more information. This may take up to 7 days; feel free to contact the reviewer with any questions you might have.  Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Z. Patterson -- Z. Patterson (talk) 01:26, 14 June 2026 (UTC)

Your nomination of Normativity ↗ is under review

Your good article nomination ↗ of the article Normativity ↗ is 20px|alt=|link= ↗ '''under review'''. See '''Talk:Normativity/GA2{{!}}the review page ↗''' for more information. This may take up to 7 days; feel free to contact the reviewer with any questions you might have.  Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Generalissima -- Generalissima (talk) 15:05, 14 June 2026 (UTC)

Political philosophy

I would have brought this up on the article's talk page, but you are the main (if not sole) contributor and you are the only one opposing the edit.

Could you explain what exactly is the problem with this edit here ↗ (and the one previous to it)? For starters, I believe that the description in the image caption is very vague, for example, what exactly is "pragmatic governance"? This is why I viewed "founder of modernity" as a very specific claim, and one supported by a source of NM specialists (and a quote in the reference). For the latter claim about the "ends justifying the means", that is a sentiment which all scholars of Machiavelli note is a sentiment that, textually, he never uttered. One does not even need academics to know this, as it is something anyone can figure out by reading the primary sources. Considering that the scholars in the original edit are not specialists in the topic, and also that scholars are not perfect and it is possible that they can sometimes be lazy and not do simple due diligence, I view that my edit should, at the very least, be considered instead of just discarded via a quick edit summary. I assure you that I have more sources that support my reasoning than what is already offered. Care to wager? '''''Plasticwonder''''' (Cat got your tongue?) 17:05, 14 June 2026 (UTC)

:Hi {{u|Plasticwonder}} and thanks for bringing this to the talk page. The image is placed right next to the discussion of realism, so the image caption should discuss in what sense Machiavelli is a realist rather than present Machiavelli-related information that is irrelevant to the text. Maybe we can find something more concrete that fits these requirements. What about {{green|Realism is closely associated with Niccolò Machiavelli's emphasis on power politics and the pragmatic pursuit of self-interest.}}
:As I understand it, the expression "The end justifies the means" is a paraphrase of Machiavelli that is sometimes mistakenly presented as quote from Machiavelli. Our current text does not attribute it to Machiavelli as quote. It just uses this principle to describe Machiavelli's philosophy. I think that part is correct. For example this book ↗ has a full chapter on this aspect of Machiavelli's ''The Prince'', titled "The end justifies the means: end-orientation and the discourses of power".
:Concerning your suggestion, the expression "the founder of modernity" is too general and I don't think that it is widely used in this overly broad sense outside the context of political philosophy. The expression "the founder of modern political philosophy" is more commonly associated with Machiavelli, but it is also associated with Hobbes (e.g. see https://books.google.com/books?id=8QdTDwAAQBAJ&pg=PA155 ↗ and https://books.google.com/books?id=ILPoOzi6T80C&pg=PA87 ↗), so we have to qualify it in some form and can't simply state it in wikivoice. Phlsph7 (talk) 08:41, 15 June 2026 (UTC)
::You know, I never thought of it from your perspective, and this makes total sense. Thank you for your gracious reply! '''''Plasticwonder''''' (Cat got your tongue?) 14:12, 15 June 2026 (UTC)

Your nomination of Premise ↗ is on hold

Your good article nomination ↗ of the article Premise ↗ has been placed 20px|alt=|link= ↗ '''on hold''', as the article needs some changes. See '''Talk:Premise/GA1{{!}}the review page ↗''' for more information. If these are addressed within 7 days, the nomination will pass; otherwise, it may fail.  Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Z. Patterson -- Z. Patterson (talk) 23:45, 14 June 2026 (UTC)

Your nomination of Premise ↗ has passed

Your good article nomination ↗ of the article Premise ↗ has 20px|alt=|link= ↗ '''passed'''; congratulations! See '''Talk:Premise/GA1{{!}}the review page ↗''' for more information. If the article is eligible to appear ↗ in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it ↗ within the next seven days. Please also consider reviewing ↗ somebody else's nomination to help keep the backlog down.  Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Z. Patterson -- Z. Patterson (talk) 01:45, 16 June 2026 (UTC)

Promotion of Well-being ↗

{{ivmbox
|image = Cscr-featured.svg
|imagesize=60px
|extracss=font-size:1.25em; font-family:Georgia;
|text = Congratulations, Phlsph7! The article you nominated, '''Well-being ↗''', has been promoted to featured status, recognizing it as one of the best articles on Wikipedia. The '''nomination discussion ↗''' has been archived.{{parabr}}This is a rare accomplishment and you should be proud. If you would like, you may nominate it ↗ to appear on the Main Page as Today's featured article. Keep up the great work! Cheers, {{user0|Gog the Mild}} via FACBot (talk) 23:06, 16 June 2026 (UTC)
}}

Congrats!

I was go{{umlaut|i}}ng to check out your FAC for well-be{{umlaut|I}}ng and, well, I was too late! Congrats on the promotion! sina pali e lipu pi pona mute a ↗. ''toby'' ''in solidarity ↗'' 04:39, 17 June 2026 (UTC)

:Thanks! I'm glad that it worked out in the end. Phlsph7 (talk) 07:45, 17 June 2026 (UTC)

Your nomination of Normativity ↗ has passed

Your good article nomination ↗ of the article Normativity ↗ has 20px|alt=|link= ↗ '''passed'''; congratulations! See '''Talk:Normativity/GA2{{!}}the review page ↗''' for more information. If the article is eligible to appear ↗ in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it ↗ within the next seven days. Please also consider reviewing ↗ somebody else's nomination to help keep the backlog down.  Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Generalissima -- Generalissima (talk) 10:25, 25 June 2026 (UTC)

Well-being ↗ scheduled for TFA

This is to let you know that Well-being ↗ has been scheduled as today's featured article ↗ for 25 August 2026. Please check that the article needs no amendments. Feel free to amend the draft blurb, which can be found at Wikipedia:Today's featured article/August 2026 ↗, or to make comments on other matters concerning the scheduling of this article at Wikipedia talk:Today's featured article/August 2026 ↗. Please keep an eye on that page, as notifications of copy edits to or queries about the draft blurb may be posted there. I also suggest that you watchlist Wikipedia:Main Page/Errors ↗ from two days before it appears on the Main Page. Thanks, and congratulations on your work! Z1720 (talk) 15:27, 27 June 2026 (UTC)

Dualism ↗ scheduled for TFA

This is to let you know that Dualism ↗ has been scheduled as today's featured article ↗ for 29 August 2026. Please check that the article needs no amendments. Feel free to amend the draft blurb, which can be found at Wikipedia:Today's featured article/August 2026 ↗, or to make comments on other matters concerning the scheduling of this article at Wikipedia talk:Today's featured article/August 2026 ↗. Please keep an eye on that page, as notifications of copy edits to or queries about the draft blurb may be posted there. I also suggest that you watchlist Wikipedia:Main Page/Errors ↗ from two days before it appears on the Main Page. Thanks, and congratulations on your work! Z1720 (talk) 22:39, 27 June 2026 (UTC)

DYK for Premise

{{ivmbox
|image = Updated DYK query.svg
|imagesize=40px
|image class=skin-invert
|text = On 30 June 2026 ↗, '''Did you know ↗''' was updated with a fact from the article '''''Premise ↗''''', which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ''... that a faulty '''premise ↗''' can turn a whole argument into a fallacy?'' The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Premise ↗. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Premise ↗), and the hook may be added to the statistics page ↗ after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to nominate it ↗.
}}  — Amakuru (talk) and '''TechnoSquirrel69''' ('''talk''') 00:02, 30 June 2026 (UTC)
Just wonderful work. I spend years scribbling about minor people and objects but you write the aticles that a thousand clever children will pour over in decades to come. Thank you. No Swan So Fine (talk) 21:21, 30 June 2026 (UTC)

:Hi {{u|No Swan So Fine}} and thanks for the feedback! Phlsph7 (talk) 07:18, 1 July 2026 (UTC)

Tampa Bay Lightning

Hi there, I don't want you to be caught off-guard as I have resubmitted the article to GAN. I have to taken your review comments and put in a couple hours worth of work to get it better suited. I know there will likely be some small issues, but there shouldn't be anything glaringly bad to fail it immediately now. If there are, definitely let me know. Cheers! Conyo14 (talk) 02:57, 5 July 2026 (UTC)

:{{ping|Conyo14}} Thanks for the changes, the sourcing looks better now. Good luck with the renomination. Phlsph7 (talk) 07:10, 5 July 2026 (UTC)

DYK

Hi, I would generally advise against starting a review before the nominator has done their QPQ. TSventon (talk) 15:15, 5 July 2026 (UTC)

:{{ping|TSventon}} Thanks for the input. I haven't run into this type of problem before, but that's probably a good idea to be on the safe side. Phlsph7 (talk) 16:09, 5 July 2026 (UTC)

The 2026 Core Contest Winners!

The winners of the 2026 Core Contest ↗ are announced 🎉. A ''huge'' turnout that resulted in one of our trickiest deliberation sessions. The judges ({{noping|Aza24}}, {{noping|Femke}} and {{noping|Casliber}}) would like to thank everybody who joined and congratulate the winners!

First place (and a prize of £120) goes to {{user|Vigilantcosmicpenguin}} for his dual efforts on Flatbread ↗ and Tortilla ↗! One, formerly an unsourced list-like article, and the other, once a poorly sourced and spotty overview, both now number 250+ citations from an impressively academic source pool. We particularly commend the efforts to globalize content, treat the topics comprehensively and thoughtfully select illustrations. Both articles (one now a GA ↗) are of a uniquely high quality amid the often underserved food topics on Wikipedia. Bravo!

Second place (and a prize of £100) goes to {{user|Phlsph7}}, a Core Contest regular who has once again shown a mastery of big topics, with his dual efforts on Agnosticism ↗ and Premise ↗—both now GA ↗s (one, with a review by our first place winner!). With immensely thorough sourcing improvements, alongside carefully nuanced text on these often misunderstood topics, both articles are a pleasure to read.

Third place (and a prize of £80) goes to {{user|MCE89}}, whose improvements to the Heard Island and McDonald Islands ↗ article have led to a triumphant FA ↗ declaration. The incredible balance of detail between human, geographical and flora-fauna elements is a great achievement, and sets a high standard for future island articles.

If you wish to start or stop receiving news about The Core Contest, please add or remove yourself from the delivery list ↗. – '''Aza24 (talk)''' 02:30, 7 July 2026 (UTC)

:Congratulations! BorgQueen (talk) 11:32, 7 July 2026 (UTC)

Core Contest 2026 prize winner

Hello. Thank you for taking part in this year's Core Contest and congratulations on your win. Could you please write to me at karla.marte@wikimedia.org.uk to coordinate your prize. I may have your address from last year, just making sure it is is till the same. Best wishes, Karla Marte(WMUK) (talk) 09:42, 8 July 2026 (UTC)

Your nomination of Semiotics ↗ has passed

Your good article nomination ↗ of the article Semiotics ↗ has 20px|alt=|link= ↗ '''passed'''; congratulations! See '''Talk:Semiotics/GA1{{!}}the review page ↗''' for more information. If the article is eligible to appear ↗ in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it ↗ within the next seven days. Please also consider reviewing ↗ somebody else's nomination to help keep the backlog down.  Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Freedom4U -- Freedom4U (talk) 18:06, 9 July 2026 (UTC)