User Talk: Umofomia

Server-side rendered snapshot of this editor's Wikipedia talk page discussions.

{{busy}}

{{archive box|Older conversations I've had with other users (including those that appeared on their talk pages) can be found here:

February 2005 - March 2005 ↗

April 2005 - May 2005 ↗

June 2005 - December 2006 ↗

}}

__TOC__

<br clear=all />

Stroke order

You noticed there : Talk:Stroke_order#Calligraphic_Stroke_Order ↗, that stroke order may change.

I'm sorry to don't have a perfect english, but I wrote this Stroke_order#Read_the_Stroke_order_from_the_graph ↗ & Stroke_order#Three_National_stroke_order_schools ↗ which may answer to you {{;)}} Yug <small><span style="color:green;">(talk)</span></small> 17:07, 19 February 2007 (UTC)

Taiwanese Mandarin

Posted on User talk:LDHan ↗ 08:36, 27 March 2007 (UTC)

: Thanks for pointing out the distinction between perfect and perfective. I just felt the translation of 你吃了吗? as "did you eat?" is not really idiomatic English. And if the two phrases are not interchangeable, then perhaps they are not a useful illustration of the 有 construction. Please correct if I've made any mistakes. LDHan 10:25, 27 March 2007 (UTC)

:: Replied ↗ 00:10, 1 April 2007 (UTC)

Fix this template

Posted on User talk:Wikimachine ↗ 22:07, 6 April 2007 (UTC)

: Replied ↗ 23:19, 6 April 2007 (UTC)

:: I'm very sorry for messing up the template. I tried to fix it according to a new proposal laid out in WikiProject Korea's discussion page. Thanks for your concern. (Wikimachine 22:54, 7 April 2007 (UTC))

Stroke order according to each country

<s>hello, The article Stroke order now contain data to answer to a previous question : Talk:Stroke order#Calligraphic Stroke Order ↗</s>

<s>see : Stroke order#Three national schools of stroke order ↗ </s>

<s>and : Which stroke order for each style ↗</s>

Other question : do you allow me to archive your question "Talk:Stroke order#Calligraphic Stroke Order ↗" in one week ?
Yug <small><span style="color:green;">(talk)</span></small> 16:35, 14 June 2007 (UTC)

: ........... I want archive it exactly for such cases : it's the 2nd time I inform you about this......... Sorry......
: <small>—Preceding unsigned ↗ comment added by Yug (talk • contribs ↗) 16:38, 14 June 2007 (UTC)</small>

:: Replied on User talk:Yug ↗ 17:49, 9 March 2008 (UTC)
:::Noticed. thanks for your answer. ;) Yug 15:22, 16 March 2008 (UTC)

Gweilo

Posted on User talk:HenryLi ↗ 23:45, 1 March 2008 (UTC)

: I've just restored the deleted. — HenryLi (Talk) 15:40, 2 March 2008 (UTC)

Chinese cash

You have previously participated in discussions of the title of the article Chinese wén ↗. If you care, please discuss a resolution of this issue by suggesting your preferred title at Talk:Chinese wén ↗. — <span style="border:1px solid blue;padding:1px;"><span style="color:#fef; background:navy;">''' AjaxSmack '''</span></span> 01:55, 31 July 2008 (UTC)

Extremaduran language

Would you can to help me, in the article Extremaduran language ↗? <small><span class="autosigned">—Preceding unsigned ↗ comment added by El estremeñu (talk • contribs ↗) 01:04, 6 August 2009 (UTC)</span></small> 

:Replied on User talk:El estremeñu ↗ 01:11, 8 August 2009 (UTC)

::You can to help me, correcting ortographics or linguistic errors, please, make it... :::My English is very bad... <small><span class="autosigned">—Preceding unsigned ↗ comment added by El estremeñu (talk • contribs ↗) 01:48, 8 August 2009 (UTC)</span></small>

You are now a Reviewer

right|130px ↗
Hello. Your account has been granted the "{{mono|1=reviewer}}" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits ↗ on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a two-month trial ↗ scheduled to end 15 August 2010.

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed ↗ to articles placed under pending changes. Pending changes is applied to only a small number of articles ↗, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages ↗.

When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism ↗ or BLP violations ↗, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Wikipedia:Reviewing process ↗). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here ↗.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.  Courcelles (talk) 01:28, 18 June 2010 (UTC)

:Replied on User talk:Courcelles ↗ 21:39, 19 June 2010 (UTC)

Wikipedia_talk:Article_titles#Non-Roman_characters_in_redirects_to_articles ↗

There is currently a policy discussion that may concern a Wikiproject that you are a member of Wikipedia_talk:Article_titles#Non-Roman_characters_in_redirects_to_articles ↗. '''Handschuh ↗'''-<sup>talk to me ↗</sup> 02:18, 19 November 2010 (UTC)

Research survey invitation

Greetings Umofomia-

My name is Randall Livingstone, and I am a doctoral student at the University of Oregon, studying digital media and online community. I am posting to invite you to participate in my research study exploring the work of Wikipedia editors who are members of WikiProject: Countering Systemic Bias. The online survey should take 20 to 25 minutes to complete and can be found here:

https://oregon.qualtrics.com/SE/?SID=SV_cSHzuwaQovaZ6ss

Your responses will help online communication researchers like me to better understand the collaborations, challenges, and purposeful work of Wikipedia editors like you. In addition, at the end of the survey you will have the opportunity to express your interest in a follow-up online interview with the researcher.

This research project has been reviewed and approved by the Wikimedia Research Committee as well as the Office for Protection of Human Subjects at the University of Oregon. For a detailed description of the project, please visit its Meta page ↗.
This survey is voluntary, and your confidentiality will be protected. You will have the choice of using your Wikipedia User Name during the research or creating a unique pseudonym. You may skip any question you choose, and you may withdraw at any time. By completing the survey, you are providing consent to participate in the research.

If you have any questions about the study, please contact me via my Talk Page (UOJComm) ↗ or via [mailto://livingst@uoregon.edu email]. My faculty advisor is [mailto://light@uoregon.edu Dr. Ryan Light]. If you have any questions regarding your rights as a research participant, please contact the [mailto://human_subjects@orc.uoregon.edu Office for Protection of Human Subjects] at the University of Oregon.

Thank you very much.

Sincerely,

Randall Livingstone
School of Journalism & Communication
University of Oregon
UOJComm (talk) 18:44, 22 June 2011 (UTC)

Your feedback is requested

80px|thumb|link=Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Writing_systems#Poll_on_the_future_of_WikiProject_Writing_Systems ↗

WikiProject Writing Systems ↗ is conducting a poll ↗ regarding its future goals, and we have identified you as a person with a vested interest in the future of that project. Whether you are a member of the WikiProject, a frequent contributor, or a passerby with an interest in the subject, we want your input as to the future emphasis that the Writing Systems project will take. Please take a moment to peruse the entries and add your comments where you have an opinion. You can visit the poll by clicking here ↗, or on the project image, 書, on the right. <small><span class="autosigned">— Preceding unsigned ↗ comment added by Vanisaac (talk • contribs ↗) 12:31, 29 July 2011 (UTC) </span></small>

Two variants of lowercase G

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Allography&diff=215525869 ↗ you were actually wrong at this point, they do: <span class="nounderlines">g ↗ ɡ ↗</span>. Use some tools to reveal Unicode code points next time, before boldly editing data you are not familiar with. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 22:05, 13 February 2012 (UTC)

Nobel Laureates in the University Infobox

I noticed you added a "Nobel Laureates" section to MIT's ↗ infobox today more than 4 years ago ↗ but it is not a part of the university infobox template. I have added a new section ↗ to discuss this topic on the Template talk:Infobox university ↗ page. I think the wiki community would like to hear what you have to say about this subject, not just as the first person to add it to MIT's infobox, but as a notable wiki contributor. --Triesault (talk) 01:15, 10 December 2012 (UTC)

Love history & culture? Get involved in WikiProject World Digital Library!

{|style="background:#CEE3F6; border:1px solid #cee3f6; margin:0.5em; padding:0.5em;border-radius: 8px;"
|-
!colspan=2 style="font-size:150%;"|World Digital Library ↗ Wikipedia Partnership - We need ''you!''
|-
|right|90px ↗
|Hi '''{{ {{{|safesubst:}}}ROOTPAGENAME}}'''! I'm the Wikipedian In Residence at the World Digital Library ↗, a project of the Library of Congress ↗ and UNESCO ↗. I'm recruiting Wikipedians who are passionate about history & culture to participate in improving Wikipedia using the WDL's vast free online resources. Participants can earn our awesome WDL barnstar and help to disseminate free knowledge from over 100 libraries in 7 different languages. Multilingual editors are welcome! (But being multilingual is not a requirement.) Please sign up to participate here ↗. Thanks for editing Wikipedia and I look forward to working with you! SarahStierch (talk) 22:22, 29 May 2013 (UTC)
|}

Are you active?

I'm writing on behalf of Wikipedia:WikiProject Linguistics ↗ to see if you are active or not. I've moved your name to the inactive participants list. If you are active, feel free to move your name back to the active participants list. We hope you come back soon! Joeystanley (talk) 21:28, 23 April 2014 (UTC)

: Replied on User talk:Joeystanley ↗ 18:46, 24 April 2014 (UTC)

Join

Population update project

Hi. The 18th edition of ''Ethnologue'' just came out, and if we divide up our language articles among us, it won't take long to update them. I would appreciate it if you could help out, even if it's just a few articles (5,000 articles is a lot for just me), but I won't be insulted if you delete this request.

A largely complete list of articles to be updated is at :Category:Language articles citing Ethnologue 17 ↗. The priority articles are in :Category:Language articles with old Ethnologue 17 speaker data ↗. These are the 10% that have population figures at least 25 years old.

Probably 90% of the time, ''Ethnologue'' has not changed their figures between the 17th and 18th editions, so all we need to do is change "e17" to "e18" in the reference (ref) field of the language info box. That will change the citation for the artcle to the current edition. Please put the data in the proper fields, or the info box will flag it as needing editorial review. The other relevant fields are "speakers" (the number of native speakers in all countries), "date" (the date of the reference or census that Ethnologue uses, not the date of Ethnologue!), and sometimes "speakers2". Our convention has been to enter e.g. "1990 census" when a census is used, as other data can be much older than the publication date. Sometimes a citation elsewhere in the article depends on the e17 entry, in which case you will need to change "name=e17" to "name=e18" in the reference tag (assuming the 18th edition still supports the cited claim).

Remember, we want the *total* number of native speakers, which is often not the first figure given by ''Ethnologue''. Sometimes the data is too incompatible to add together (e.g. a figure from the 1950s for one country, and a figure from 2006 for another), in which case it should be presented that way. That's one use for the "speakers2" field. If you're not sure, just ask, or skip that article.

Data should not be displayed with more than two, or at most three, significant figures. Sometimes it should be rounded off to just one significant figure, e.g. when some of the component data used by ''Ethnologue'' has been approximated with one figure (200,000, 3 million, etc.) and the other data has greater precision. For example, a figure of 200,000 for one country and 4,230 for another is really just 200,000 in total, as the 4,230 is within the margin of rounding off in the 200,000. If you want to retain the spurious precision of the number in ''Ethnologue'', you might want to use the {{tl|sigfig}} template. (First parameter in this template is for the data, second is for the number of figures to round it off to.)

Dates will often need to be a range of all the country data in the Ethnologue article. When entering the date range, I often ignore dates from countries that have only a few percent of the population, as often 10% or so of the population isn't even separately listed by ''Ethnologue'' and so is undated anyway.

If ''Ethnologue'' does not provide a date for the bulk of the population, just enter "no date" in the date field. But if the population figure is undated, and hasn't changed between the 17th & 18th editions of ''Ethnologue'', please leave the ref field set to "e17", and maybe add a comment to keep it so that other editors don't change it. In cases like this, the edition of ''Ethnologue'' that the data first appeared in may be our only indication of how old it is. We still cite the 14th edition in a couple dozen articles, so our readers can see that the data is getting old.

The articles in the categories linked above are over 90% of the job. There are probably also articles that do not currently cite Ethnologue, but which we might want to update with the 18th edition. I'll need to generate another category to capture those, probably after most of the ''Ethnologue'' 17 citations are taken care of.

Jump in at the WP:LANG ↗ talk page if you have any comments or concerns. Thanks for any help you can give!

— kwami (talk) 02:09, 4 March 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open! ↗

{{Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2015/MassMessage}} MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:57, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016 ↗: Voting now open!

{{Ivmbox|Hello, Umofomia. Voting in the '''2016 Arbitration Committee elections ↗''' is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee ↗ is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process ↗. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans ↗, topic bans ↗, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy ↗ describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements ↗ and submit your choices on '''the voting page ↗'''. Mdann52 (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
|Scale of justice 2.svg|imagesize=40px}}

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

{{Ivmbox|Hello, Umofomia. Voting in the '''2017 Arbitration Committee elections ↗''' is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee ↗ is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process ↗. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans ↗, topic bans ↗, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy ↗ describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates ↗ and submit your choices on the '''voting page ↗'''. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
|Scale of justice 2.svg|imagesize=40px}}

Proposed deletion ↗ of :RentHop ↗

left|link=|48px| ↗

The article :RentHop ↗ has been proposed for deletion ↗ because of the following concern:
<blockquote>An advertorially toned page on an unremarkable startup of local interest. Significant RS coverage not found. The article is cited to passing mentions, launch publicity, blogs, WP:SPIP ↗, and other sources otherwise not suitable for notability. Fails WP:NCORP ↗ / WP:CORPDEPTH ↗.</blockquote>

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons ↗.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary ↗ or on the article's talk page ↗.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process ↗, but other deletion process ↗es exist. In particular, the speedy deletion ↗ process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion ↗ allows discussion to reach consensus ↗ for deletion. K.e.coffman (talk) 03:02, 6 January 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of :RentHop ↗ for deletion

<div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">48px|alt=|link= ↗</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ''':RentHop ↗''' is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines ↗ or whether it should be deleted ↗.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/RentHop ↗ until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. K.e.coffman (talk) 23:50, 13 January 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

{{Ivmbox|Hello, Umofomia. Voting in the '''2018 Arbitration Committee elections ↗''' is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee ↗ is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process ↗. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans ↗, topic bans ↗, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy ↗ describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates ↗ and submit your choices on the '''voting page ↗'''. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
|Scale of justice 2.svg|imagesize=40px}}

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

<table class="messagebox " style="border: 1px solid #AAA; background: ivory; padding: 0.5em; width: 100%;">
<tr><td style="vertical-align:middle; padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em;">40px ↗</td><td>Hello! Voting in the '''2019 Arbitration Committee elections ↗''' is now open until 23:59 on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2019|end}}-1 day}}. All '''eligible users ↗''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee ↗ is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process ↗. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans ↗, topic bans ↗, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy ↗ describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates ↗ and submit your choices on the '''2019|poll}}|voting page ↗'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:04, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
</td></tr>
</table>

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

<table class="messagebox " style="border: 1px solid #AAA; background: ivory; padding: 0.5em; width: 100%;">
<tr><td style="vertical-align:middle; padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em;">40px ↗</td><td>Hello! Voting in the '''2021 Arbitration Committee elections ↗''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2021|end}}-1 day}}. All '''eligible users ↗''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee ↗ is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process ↗. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans ↗, topic bans ↗, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy ↗ describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates ↗ and submit your choices on the '''2021|poll}}|voting page ↗'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. <small>MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:07, 23 November 2021 (UTC)</small>
</td></tr>
</table>

"List of phases" listed at Redirects for discussion ↗

30px ↗
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect :List of phases ↗ and has thus listed it for discussion ↗. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 May 10#List of phases ↗ until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion.  – Arms & Hearts (talk) 12:05, 10 May 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

<div class="ivmbox " style="margin-bottom: 1em; border: 1px solid #AAA; background-color: ivory; padding: 0.5em; display: flex; align-items: center; ">
<div class="ivmbox-image" style="padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em; flex: 1 0 40px;">40px ↗</div>
<div class="ivmbox-text">
Hello! Voting in the '''2022 Arbitration Committee elections ↗''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2022|end}}-1 day}}. All '''eligible users ↗''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee ↗ is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process ↗. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans ↗, topic bans ↗, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy ↗ describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates ↗ and submit your choices on the '''2022|poll}}|voting page ↗'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. <small>MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:27, 29 November 2022 (UTC)</small>

</div>
</div>

":Queensboro ↗" listed at Redirects for discussion ↗

30px ↗
The redirect <span class="plainlinks">[//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Queensboro&redirect=no Queensboro]</span> has been listed at redirects for discussion ↗ to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines ↗. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at {{slink|Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 March 15#Queensboro}} until a consensus is reached.  —⁠ ⁠BarrelProof (talk) 19:09, 15 March 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

<div class="ivmbox " style="margin-bottom: 1em; border: 1px solid #AAA; background-color: ivory; padding: 0.5em; display: flex; align-items: center; ">
<div class="ivmbox-image" style="padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em; flex: 1 0 40px; max-width: 100px">40px ↗</div>
<div class="ivmbox-text">
Hello! Voting in the '''2023 Arbitration Committee elections ↗''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2023|end}}-1 day}}. All '''eligible users ↗''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee ↗ is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process ↗. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans ↗, topic bans ↗, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy ↗ describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates ↗ and submit your choices on the '''2023|poll}}|voting page ↗'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. <small>MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:22, 28 November 2023 (UTC)</small>

</div>
</div>

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

<div class="ivmbox " style="margin-bottom: 1em; border: 1px solid #a2a9b1; background-color: #fdf2d5; padding: 0.5em; display: flex; align-items: center; ">
<div class="ivmbox-image noresize" style="padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em;">40px ↗</div>
<div class="ivmbox-text">
Hello! Voting in the '''2024 Arbitration Committee elections ↗''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2024|end}}-1 day}}. All '''eligible users ↗''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee ↗ is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process ↗. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans ↗, topic bans ↗, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy ↗ describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates ↗ and submit your choices on the '''2024|poll}}|voting page ↗'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. <small>MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:08, 19 November 2024 (UTC)</small>

</div>
</div>

ArbCom 2025 Elections voter message

<div class="ivmbox " style="margin-bottom: 1em; border: 1px solid #a2a9b1; background-color: #fdf2d5; padding: 0.5em; display: flex; align-items: center; ">
<div class="ivmbox-image" style="padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em;flex-basis: 40px">40px ↗</div>
<div class="ivmbox-text">
Hello! Voting in the '''2025 Arbitration Committee elections ↗''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2025|end}}-1 day}}. All '''eligible users ↗''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee ↗ is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process ↗. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans ↗, topic bans ↗, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy ↗ describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please review the candidates ↗ and submit your choices on the '''2025|poll}}|voting page ↗'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. <small>MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:20, 18 November 2025 (UTC)</small>

</div>
</div>