User Talk: Wfclegend

Server-side rendered snapshot of this editor's Wikipedia talk page discussions.

Wfclegend, you are invited to the Teahouse!

{| style="margin: 1em 4em;"
|- valign="top"
| alt=Teahouse logo|link=w:en:WP:Teahouse|File:WP teahouse logo 2.png by User:Heatherawalls, licensed under CC BY-SA 3.0 ↗
| <div style="background-color:#f4f3f0; color: #393D38; padding: 0.4em 1em;border-radius:10px; font-size: 1.1em;">
Hi '''Wfclegend'''! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. <br />Be our guest at the Teahouse ↗! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like {{noping|Masumrezarock100}} (talk ↗).

<div class="submit ui-button ui-widget ui-state-default ui-corner-all ui-button-text-only" role="button" aria-disabled="false" style="float: left;"><span class="ui-button-text">Visit the Teahouse ↗</span></div>

<div style="text-align:right;">We hope to see you there!

<small>Delivered by {{noping|HostBot}} on behalf of the Teahouse hosts ↗</small>

<small>16:03, 11 February 2019 (UTC)</small></div>
</div>
|}
Category:Wikipedians who have received a Teahouse invitation ↗

February 2019

25px|alt=Information icon ↗ Hello, and thank you for your contributions ↗ to Wikipedia ↗. I noticed that you recently added commentary to an article, :Hampshire League 2004 ↗. While Wikipedia welcomes editors' opinions on an article and how it could be changed, these comments are more appropriate for the article's accompanying talk page ↗. If you post your comments there, other editors ↗ working on the same article will notice and respond to them, and your comments will not disrupt the flow of the article. However, keep in mind that even on the talk page of an article, you should limit your discussion to improving the article. Article talk pages are not the place to discuss opinions of the subject of articles, nor are such pages a forum. Thank you. <b>J<small><small>ACKINTHE</small></small>B<small><small>OX</small></small></b> • <i><b><sup><small><span style="color:#006400">TALK</span></small></sup></b></i> 08:17, 15 February 2019 (UTC)

:File:Eastleigh Athletic FC.jpg ↗

left|25px|alt= ↗Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to :Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing ↗. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for the calculation of the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution ↗, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content ↗. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot (talk) 18:01, 15 February 2019 (UTC)

:File:Bishop's Waltham Town FC.jpg ↗

:File:Road-Sea Southampton F.C.jpg ↗

:File:Sholing Sports F.C.jpg ↗

:File:Ryde Sports F.C.jpg ↗

:File:Portals Athletic FC logo.jpg ↗

:File:Wellworthy Athletic FC.jpg ↗

:File:Freemantle FC.jpg ↗

Orphaned non-free image File:RS Basingstoke F.C.jpg

35px|text-top|left|⚠|link= ↗ Thanks for uploading ''':File:RS Basingstoke F.C.jpg ↗'''. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use ↗. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media ↗).

Note that any non-free images not used in any '''articles''' will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion ↗. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:47, 23 February 2019 (UTC)

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

<table class="messagebox " style="border: 1px solid #AAA; background: ivory; padding: 0.5em; width: 100%;">
<tr><td style="vertical-align:middle; padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em;">40px ↗</td><td>Hello! Voting in the '''2019 Arbitration Committee elections ↗''' is now open until 23:59 on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2019|end}}-1 day}}. All '''eligible users ↗''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee ↗ is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process ↗. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans ↗, topic bans ↗, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy ↗ describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates ↗ and submit your choices on the '''2019|poll}}|voting page ↗'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:24, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
</td></tr>
</table>

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

<table class="messagebox " style="border: 1px solid #AAA; background: ivory; padding: 0.5em; width: 100%;">
<tr><td style="vertical-align:middle; padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em;">40px ↗</td><td>Hello! Voting in the '''2020 Arbitration Committee elections ↗''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2020|end}}-1 day}}. All '''eligible users ↗''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee ↗ is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process ↗. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans ↗, topic bans ↗, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy ↗ describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates ↗ and submit your choices on the '''2020|poll}}|voting page ↗'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:00, 24 November 2020 (UTC)
</td></tr>
</table>

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

<div class="ivmbox " style="margin-bottom: 1em; border: 1px solid #a2a9b1; background-color: #fdf2d5; padding: 0.5em; display: flex; align-items: center; ">
<div class="ivmbox-image noresize" style="padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em;">40px ↗</div>
<div class="ivmbox-text">
Hello! Voting in the '''2024 Arbitration Committee elections ↗''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2024|end}}-1 day}}. All '''eligible users ↗''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee ↗ is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process ↗. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans ↗, topic bans ↗, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy ↗ describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates ↗ and submit your choices on the '''2024|poll}}|voting page ↗'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. <small>MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:41, 19 November 2024 (UTC)</small>

</div>
</div>

Writing style

Hey Wfclegend, good work expanding multiple football club pages recently. One thing you should know for future reference, though, is that you should try to write in an encyclopedic manner as much as possible. I've seen you use exclamations and stuff generally along the lines of WP:PUFFERY ↗ on these articles (for example as we speak there is some on Awbridge F.C. ↗). Just try and limit that in the future. Also, please try and make your sources not be bare URLs. You can either use templates in the source editor, or just use the visual editor and have it convert them if that's easier.

Thanks. Tolozen (talk) 10:00, 15 July 2025 (UTC)

:Thanks very much for the positive feedback, much appreciated and I will remember this for future reference. Wfclegend (talk) 13:06, 15 July 2025 (UTC)

July 2025

25px|alt=Information icon ↗ Please do not remove maintenance templates ↗ from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to :Braishfield F.C. ↗, without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary ↗. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted ↗. Thank you. Dl2000 (talk) 22:42, 15 July 2025 (UTC)

:OK, but can you please tell me what exactly what text (or word(s)) need amending? The article is accurate and does contain real information that has been referenced. I'm not sure what else to do, so any clear concise advice would be much appreciated. Thank you. Wfclegend (talk) 07:12, 16 July 2025 (UTC)

Minor edits

Hi - just looked at the history of Hedge End Rangers F.C. ↗ and saw that all your edits on it were marked as minor. Just wanted to let you know that the minor edit checkbox is meant to be for just really tiny edits (like formatting or fixing a single typo) - anything that adds or removes something to an article shouldn't be marked as minor. Thanks <span style="font-weight:bold;color:#f50">BugGhost</span> 🦗👻 22:24, 26 July 2025 (UTC)

Reply

The amount of time you have spent researching is not a factor for notability, nor is the age ''per se''. The page isn't acceptable even disregarding notability.
If you have a conflict of interest ↗, you must declare it.

Also read the following regarding writing an article:

you must provide '''independent verifiable sources ↗''' to enable us to verify the facts and show that it meets the notability guidelines ↗. Sources that are not acceptable include those linked to the club, press releases, YouTube, IMDB, social media and other sites that can be self-edited, logs, websites of unknown or non-reliable provenance, and sites that are just reporting what the club claims or interviewing its management. Note that references should be in-line so we can tell what fact each is supporting, and should not be bare urls

:*Most of your text was completely unreferenced, and of the three bare url sources you did give, the first said "no other facts", the second didn't mention him, and the obituary said nothing about the club apart from Crompton's presidency. Basically, nothing you have said is verified apart from where they play.
:*Nothing you wrote, even if verified, shows how the club meets the notability criteria linked above.
:*The club doesn't seem to have any employees, management structure, funding or expenditure.
:*You appear to be writing the article backwards. Find independent verifiable sources ↗ first and write text based on what they say. Don't write the text in the vague hope you can find references later.

You must write in a non-promotional ↗ tone. Articles must be neutral and encyclopaedic, with verifiable facts, not opinions or reviews.

:*Unsourced claims include ''one of the top amateur sides in Southampton, enjoying great success in their hey-day... The fifties saw Netley win countless trophies... These successes...'' and so on''

There shouldn't be ''any'' url links in the article, only in the "References" or "External links" sections.

You must not copy text from elsewhere. Copyrighted text is not allowed in Wikipedia, as outlined in this policy ↗. That applies ''even'' to pages created by you or your organisation, unless they state '''clearly and explicitly''' that the text is '''public domain'''. We require that text posted here can be used, modified and distributed for any purpose, including commercial; text is considered to be copyright unless explicitly stated otherwise. There are ways to donate copyrighted text to Wikipedia, as described here ↗; please note that simply asserting on the talk page that you are the owner of the copyright, or you have permission to use the text, isn't sufficient.

:*I didn't check.
The fact that other
articles have not been deleted doesn't help you, either they met the criteria or should be deleted as well. See What about article x? ↗. Also note that many articles would have been accepted before the notability guidelines were made stricter.

Your text comes nowhere close to meeting Wikipedia editing standards; if you try again, write it as a draft and submit for review, but bear in mind that it might be rejected on notability anyway.
Before attempting to write an article again, please make sure that the topic meets the notability criteria linked above, and check that you can find independent third party sources ↗.

I now see that you have contributed to several other club articles, which have the same problems, with references absent or of very poor quality (such as the clubs' websites).

I'll leave those for now, but you would do better to get those up to scratch before you seek to add to their number <b style="font-family:Lucida;color:red">Jimfbleak</b> - <i style="font-family:arial;color:green">talk to me?</i> 15:41, 28 July 2025 (UTC)

:(later...) have a look at Gillingham F.C. ↗ <b style="font-family:Lucida;color:red">Jimfbleak</b> - <i style="font-family:arial;color:green">talk to me?</i> 15:46, 28 July 2025 (UTC)
:Hi, thanks for the advice - I get what you are saying, but I hadn't finished the article and it would have been nice to given me the opportunity to amend it before deleting! If you can please re-instate it then I will shorten it as instructed. Wfclegend (talk) 16:09, 28 July 2025 (UTC)
::If it's not finished, it should be a draft, I'll restore to draft shortly <b style="font-family:Lucida;color:red">Jimfbleak</b> - <i style="font-family:arial;color:green">talk to me?</i> 18:01, 28 July 2025 (UTC)
:::Hi Jim, thanks for the advice - this is very useful. I have amended the AFC Netley article. It is still in draft, please could you take a look and let me know if this is now acceptable. Wfclegend (talk) 21:42, 3 August 2025 (UTC)

Tone and neutrality

Hi, just some further advice following some my edits and comments I can see above.

An encyclopaedia has a dry, neutral and factual tone. Wikipedia does not have any opinion about a club's season, good or bad. It does not have an opinion whether relegation is unfortunate, or promotion is well deserved. It does not think it sad when a club has to wind up.

It does not decide if something happens "soon" or "immediate". If it is notable that something happened on a date, include it and let the reader decide if that is soon, or late.

That doesn't mean you cannot say any of the above, if they are attributable opinions that you can provide a cite for. It also of course help if it is the opinion of someone notable. An expert, an authority or a recognised commentator. But you cannot have it appear as either your, or Wikipedia's, opinion.

You're writing some good stuff, you just need to adopt the right style of writing. <span style="color: green;">Escape Orbit</span> <sup>(Talk) ↗</sup> 14:07, 12 August 2025 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi Wfclegend. Thank you for your work on Broughton F.C. ↗. Another editor, Northernhenge, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol ↗ and left the following comment:

{{Bq|1=Thanks for creating this page. Normally other wikipedia articles only need to be linked once, certainly within the same section, so I’ve removed some duplicated links. I’ve also tagged the article for bare urls because currently quite a few of the refs are just weblinks without authors, titles, dates etc.}}

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{code|<nowiki>{{Re|</nowiki>Northernhenge<nowiki>}}</nowiki>}}. <small>(Message delivered via the Page Curation ↗ tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)</small>

Northernhenge (talk) 23:23, 30 August 2025 (UTC)

License tagging for File:Awbridge FC.jpg

Thanks for uploading :File:Awbridge FC.jpg ↗. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags ↗ to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list ↗, click on this link ↗, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions ↗. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 12:30, 31 August 2025 (UTC)

Nomination of :Sway F.C. ↗ for deletion

<div class="afd-notice">
<div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0;">48px|alt=|link= ↗</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article :Sway F.C. ↗ is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines ↗ or whether it should be deleted ↗.

The article will be discussed at '''Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sway F.C. ↗''' until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.</div> Govvy (talk) 14:19, 4 September 2025 (UTC)

Ways to improve B.T.C. Southampton F.C.

Hello, Wfclegend,

Thank you for creating B.T.C. Southampton F.C. ↗.

I have tagged the page ↗ as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process ↗ and note that:

{{Quote|1=Thanks for creating this page. I haven’t managed to find the documents listed in the references section. Please add publishers, and/or the name of the archive office where they are located.}}

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with <code><nowiki>{{Re|</nowiki>Northernhenge<nowiki>}}</nowiki></code>. Remember to sign your reply with <code><nowiki>~~~~</nowiki></code>. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse ↗.

<small>Delivered via the Page Curation ↗ tool, on behalf of the reviewer.</small> 

Northernhenge (talk) 21:15, 7 September 2025 (UTC)

October 2025

25px|alt=Information icon ↗ Hello! Thank you for your recent contributions to :Whitecroft & Barton Sports F.C. ↗. I did have one note for you. I am working on a maintenance project to clean up :Category:Pages using infoboxes with thumbnail images ↗. In the future, please do not use thumbnails when adding images to an infobox (see WP:INFOBOXIMAGE ↗). What does this mean? Well in the infobox, when you specify the image you wish to use, instead of doing it like this:

{{para|image|{{var|<nowiki>thumb|Some image caption ↗</nowiki>}}}}

Instead just supply the name of the image. So in this case you can simply do:

{{para|image|{{var|SomeImage.jpg}}}}.

There will then be a separate parameter for the image caption such as {{para|caption|{{var|Some image caption}}}}. Please note that this is a generic form message I am leaving on your page because you recently added a thumbnail to an infobox. The specific parameters for the image and caption may be different for the infobox you are using! Please consult the Template page for the infobox being used to see better documentation. Thanks!! '''<span style="color:#00ced1">Zack</span><span style="color:#007F94">mann</span>''' (<sup>Talk to me ↗</sup>/<sub><span style="color:orange;">What I been doing</span> ↗</sub>) 09:52, 2 October 2025 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Wellow F.C.

Hello, Wfclegend,

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username SnowyRiver28 and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I have tagged an article that you started, Wellow F.C. ↗, for deletion, because a consensus decision ↗ previously decided that it wasn't suitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. If you wish to restore a page deleted via a deletion discussion, please use the deletion review process ↗ instead, rather than reposting the content of the page.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can <span class="plainlinks">'''F.C.}}&action=edit&section=new&preload=Template:Hangon_preload&preloadtitle=This+page+should+not+be+speedy+deleted+because...+ contest this deletion ↗'''</span> but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top. If the page is already deleted by the time you come across this message and you wish to retrieve the deleted material, please contact the {{Querylink|Special:Log|qs=type=delete&page=Wellow+F.C.&subtype=delete|deleting administrator}}.

For any further query, please leave a comment here and prepend it with <code><nowiki>{{Re|</nowiki>SnowyRiver28<nowiki>}}</nowiki></code>. And, don't forget to sign your reply with <code><nowiki>~~~~</nowiki></code> . Thanks!

<small>Message delivered via the Page Curation ↗ tool, on behalf of the reviewer.</small>

<span style="font-family: calisto;border: 2px solid white; background-color:navy; color:white; padding:2px">SnowyRiver28</span> (talk) 13:36, 25 October 2025 (UTC)

:{{Re|SnowyRiver28}} OK that's a shame - I was hoping a more improved version would be accepted. Thanks. Wfclegend (talk) 16:50, 25 October 2025 (UTC)
::Please note this is purely procedural to prevent articles going in constant create-delete cycles.
::Use the link in my original message to have the deletion consensus reviewed, in which case an admin can undelete the content. <span style="font-family: calisto;border: 2px solid white; background-color:navy; color:white; padding:2px">SnowyRiver28</span> (talk) 22:24, 25 October 2025 (UTC)
:::It's OK thanks. Upon reflection, I agree that this club doesn't meet the criteria. Wfclegend (talk) 08:22, 27 October 2025 (UTC)

Fordingbridge Turks

Hiya. I've moved your article to draft where you can work on it in peace. The sources need to be properly identified, ideally with ISBNs but certainly with year of publication, publisher, location, page number. Ideally verifiable sources are best. Use the citation template for this. When the article is properly sourced, please do ping me and I'll review it into mainspace same day. It's potentially a great article - it just needs that sourcing to be properly done! Best Alexandermcnabb (talk) 14:08, 31 October 2025 (UTC)

:Hi Alexander, thanks very much for the good feedback. The books mentioned are 100% genuine (expertly written by local authors) but unfortunately most are privately produced or just handbooks without an ISBN number. However, I have added in page numbers. The club that this article is about are well known and are most worthy of inclusion. Wfclegend (talk) 22:03, 2 November 2025 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation ↗: Fordingbridge Turks F.C. ↗ has been accepted

<div style="border:solid 1px #57DB1E; background:var(--background-color-success-subtle, #dff2eb); padding: 0.5em 1em; color: inherit; margin: 1.5em; width: 90%;">50px|left ↗ '''Fordingbridge Turks F.C. ↗, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.'''<br />

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions. <br />

The article has been assessed as '''Start-Class''', which is recorded on its talk page ↗. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop ↗ over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme ↗ to see how you can improve the article.

<div class="autoconfirmed-show">Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself ↗ without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation ↗ if you prefer.</div>

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the '''<span class="plainlinks" >[//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/New_question&withJS=MediaWiki:AFCHD-wizard.js&page=Fordingbridge_Turks_F.C. help desk]</span>'''.<span class="unconfirmed-show"> Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself ↗ without posting a request to Articles for creation ↗.</span>

Thanks again, and happy editing!
Alexandermcnabb (talk) 05:05, 3 November 2025 (UTC)</div>

Disambiguation link notification for November 7

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Bishop's Waltham Town F.C. ↗, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Meon Valley ↗. Such links are usually incorrect ↗, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. <small>(Read the FAQ{{*}} Join us at the DPL WikiProject ↗.)</small>

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 07:58, 7 November 2025 (UTC)

ArbCom 2025 Elections voter message

<div class="ivmbox " style="margin-bottom: 1em; border: 1px solid #a2a9b1; background-color: #fdf2d5; padding: 0.5em; display: flex; align-items: center; ">
<div class="ivmbox-image" style="padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em;flex-basis: 40px">40px ↗</div>
<div class="ivmbox-text">
Hello! Voting in the '''2025 Arbitration Committee elections ↗''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2025|end}}-1 day}}. All '''eligible users ↗''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee ↗ is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process ↗. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans ↗, topic bans ↗, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy ↗ describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please review the candidates ↗ and submit your choices on the '''2025|poll}}|voting page ↗'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. <small>MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:49, 18 November 2025 (UTC)</small>

</div>
</div>

Disambiguation link notification for February 7

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Waterlooville F.C. ↗, a link pointing to the disambiguation page Southern League ↗ was added.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:58, 7 February 2026 (UTC)

Ways to improve Holt United F.C.

Hello, Wfclegend,

Thank you for creating Holt United F.C. ↗.

I have tagged the page ↗ as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process ↗ and note that:

{{Quote|1=Please fix References 3, 4, and 6, they lead to nonexistent pages.}}

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with <code><nowiki>{{Re|</nowiki>Hurricane Wind and Fire<nowiki>}}</nowiki></code>. Remember to sign your reply with <code><nowiki>~~~~</nowiki></code>. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse ↗.

<small>Delivered via the Page Curation ↗ tool, on behalf of the reviewer.</small> 

🌀Hurricane Wind and Fire (talk) (contribs) ↗🔥 15:00, 22 March 2026 (UTC)

:Thanks, I have removed the references. Wfclegend (talk) 18:16, 22 March 2026 (UTC)

Nomination of :Holt United F.C. ↗ for deletion

<div class="afd-notice">
<div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0;">48px|alt=|link= ↗</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article :Holt United F.C. ↗ is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines ↗ or whether it should be deleted ↗.

The article is being discussed at '''Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Holt United F.C. ↗''' until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the AfD notice from the article until the discussion is closed.</div> JMWt (talk) 07:50, 21 April 2026 (UTC)

Proposed deletion ↗ of :Ludgershall Sports F.C. ↗

left|link=|alt=Notice|48px| ↗

The article :Ludgershall Sports F.C. ↗ has been proposed for deletion ↗ because of the following concern:
<blockquote>'''Fails the generally accepted cut-off point ↗ for English football club notability (playing at step 6 or in the FA Cup/FA Vase, and no evidence of GNG being met.'''</blockquote>

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary ↗ or on the article's talk page ↗.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process ↗, but other deletion process ↗es exist. In particular, articles for deletion ↗ allows discussion to reach consensus ↗ for deletion based on established criteria ↗.

If the proposed deletion has already been carried out, you may request undeletion ↗ of the article at any time.

This is an automated notification. Please refer to the page's history ↗ for further information. DatBot (talk) 00:31, 24 April 2026 (UTC)

Proposed deletion ↗ of :Fair Oak F.C. ↗

left|link=|alt=Notice|48px| ↗

The article :Fair Oak F.C. ↗ has been proposed for deletion ↗ because of the following concern:
<blockquote>'''Fails the generally accepted cut-off point ↗ for English football club notability (playing at step 6 or in the FA Cup/FA Vase, and no evidence of GNG being met.'''</blockquote>

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary ↗ or on the article's talk page ↗.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process ↗, but other deletion process ↗es exist. In particular, articles for deletion ↗ allows discussion to reach consensus ↗ for deletion based on established criteria ↗.

If the proposed deletion has already been carried out, you may request undeletion ↗ of the article at any time.

This is an automated notification. Please refer to the page's history ↗ for further information. DatBot (talk) 00:31, 24 April 2026 (UTC)

Proposed deletion ↗ of :Swanmore F.C. ↗

left|link=|alt=Notice|48px| ↗

The article :Swanmore F.C. ↗ has been proposed for deletion ↗ because of the following concern:
<blockquote>'''Fails the generally accepted cut-off point ↗ for English football club notability (playing at step 6 or in the FA Cup/FA Vase, and no evidence of GNG being met.'''</blockquote>

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary ↗ or on the article's talk page ↗.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process ↗, but other deletion process ↗es exist. In particular, articles for deletion ↗ allows discussion to reach consensus ↗ for deletion based on established criteria ↗.

If the proposed deletion has already been carried out, you may request undeletion ↗ of the article at any time.

This is an automated notification. Please refer to the page's history ↗ for further information. DatBot (talk) 00:31, 24 April 2026 (UTC)

Proposed deletion ↗ of :Nursling F.C. ↗

left|link=|alt=Notice|48px| ↗

The article :Nursling F.C. ↗ has been proposed for deletion ↗ because of the following concern:
<blockquote>'''Fails the generally accepted cut-off point ↗ for English football club notability (playing at step 6 or in the FA Cup/FA Vase, and no evidence of GNG being met.'''</blockquote>

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary ↗ or on the article's talk page ↗.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process ↗, but other deletion process ↗es exist. In particular, articles for deletion ↗ allows discussion to reach consensus ↗ for deletion based on established criteria ↗.

If the proposed deletion has already been carried out, you may request undeletion ↗ of the article at any time.

This is an automated notification. Please refer to the page's history ↗ for further information. DatBot (talk) 00:31, 24 April 2026 (UTC)

Proposed deletion ↗ of :Bishopstoke F.C. ↗

left|link=|alt=Notice|48px| ↗

The article :Bishopstoke F.C. ↗ has been proposed for deletion ↗ because of the following concern:
<blockquote>'''Fails the generally accepted cut-off point ↗ for English football club notability (playing at step 6 or in the FA Cup/FA Vase, and no evidence of GNG being met.'''</blockquote>

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary ↗ or on the article's talk page ↗.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process ↗, but other deletion process ↗es exist. In particular, articles for deletion ↗ allows discussion to reach consensus ↗ for deletion based on established criteria ↗.

If the proposed deletion has already been carried out, you may request undeletion ↗ of the article at any time.

This is an automated notification. Please refer to the page's history ↗ for further information. DatBot (talk) 00:31, 24 April 2026 (UTC)

Proposed deletion ↗ of :Harlandic F.C. ↗

left|link=|alt=Notice|48px| ↗

The article :Harlandic F.C. ↗ has been proposed for deletion ↗ because of the following concern:
<blockquote>'''Fails the generally accepted cut-off point ↗ for English football club notability (playing at step 6 or in the FA Cup/FA Vase, and no evidence of GNG being met.'''</blockquote>

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary ↗ or on the article's talk page ↗.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process ↗, but other deletion process ↗es exist. In particular, articles for deletion ↗ allows discussion to reach consensus ↗ for deletion based on established criteria ↗.

If the proposed deletion has already been carried out, you may request undeletion ↗ of the article at any time.

This is an automated notification. Please refer to the page's history ↗ for further information. DatBot (talk) 00:31, 24 April 2026 (UTC)

Proposed deletion ↗ of :Ford Sports F.C. (Southampton) ↗

left|link=|alt=Notice|48px| ↗

The article :Ford Sports F.C. (Southampton) ↗ has been proposed for deletion ↗ because of the following concern:
<blockquote>'''Fails the generally accepted cut-off point ↗ for English football club notability (playing at step 6 or in the FA Cup/FA Vase, and no evidence of GNG being met.'''</blockquote>

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary ↗ or on the article's talk page ↗.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process ↗, but other deletion process ↗es exist. In particular, articles for deletion ↗ allows discussion to reach consensus ↗ for deletion based on established criteria ↗.

If the proposed deletion has already been carried out, you may request undeletion ↗ of the article at any time.

This is an automated notification. Please refer to the page's history ↗ for further information. DatBot (talk) 00:31, 24 April 2026 (UTC)

Proposed deletion ↗ of :Old Tauntonians F.C. ↗

left|link=|alt=Notice|48px| ↗

The article :Old Tauntonians F.C. ↗ has been proposed for deletion ↗ because of the following concern:
<blockquote>'''Fails the generally accepted cut-off point ↗ for English football club notability (playing at step 6 or in the FA Cup/FA Vase, and no evidence of GNG being met.'''</blockquote>

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary ↗ or on the article's talk page ↗.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process ↗, but other deletion process ↗es exist. In particular, articles for deletion ↗ allows discussion to reach consensus ↗ for deletion based on established criteria ↗.

If the proposed deletion has already been carried out, you may request undeletion ↗ of the article at any time.

This is an automated notification. Please refer to the page's history ↗ for further information. DatBot (talk) 00:31, 24 April 2026 (UTC)

Proposed deletion ↗ of :West End F.C. (Hampshire) ↗

left|link=|alt=Notice|48px| ↗

The article :West End F.C. (Hampshire) ↗ has been proposed for deletion ↗ because of the following concern:
<blockquote>'''Fails the generally accepted cut-off point ↗ for English football club notability (playing at step 6 or in the FA Cup/FA Vase, and no evidence of GNG being met.'''</blockquote>

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary ↗ or on the article's talk page ↗.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process ↗, but other deletion process ↗es exist. In particular, articles for deletion ↗ allows discussion to reach consensus ↗ for deletion based on established criteria ↗.

If the proposed deletion has already been carried out, you may request undeletion ↗ of the article at any time.

This is an automated notification. Please refer to the page's history ↗ for further information. DatBot (talk) 00:31, 24 April 2026 (UTC)

Proposed deletion ↗ of :Mullard Sports F.C. ↗

left|link=|alt=Notice|48px| ↗

The article :Mullard Sports F.C. ↗ has been proposed for deletion ↗ because of the following concern:
<blockquote>'''Fails the generally accepted cut-off point ↗ for English football club notability (playing at step 6 or in the FA Cup/FA Vase, and no evidence of GNG being met.'''</blockquote>

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary ↗ or on the article's talk page ↗.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process ↗, but other deletion process ↗es exist. In particular, articles for deletion ↗ allows discussion to reach consensus ↗ for deletion based on established criteria ↗.

If the proposed deletion has already been carried out, you may request undeletion ↗ of the article at any time.

This is an automated notification. Please refer to the page's history ↗ for further information. DatBot (talk) 00:31, 24 April 2026 (UTC)

Proposed deletion ↗ of :Netley Athletic Victoria F.C. ↗

left|link=|alt=Notice|48px| ↗

The article :Netley Athletic Victoria F.C. ↗ has been proposed for deletion ↗ because of the following concern:
<blockquote>'''Fails the generally accepted cut-off point ↗ for English football club notability (playing at step 6 or in the FA Cup/FA Vase, and no evidence of GNG being met.'''</blockquote>

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary ↗ or on the article's talk page ↗.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process ↗, but other deletion process ↗es exist. In particular, articles for deletion ↗ allows discussion to reach consensus ↗ for deletion based on established criteria ↗.

If the proposed deletion has already been carried out, you may request undeletion ↗ of the article at any time.

This is an automated notification. Please refer to the page's history ↗ for further information. DatBot (talk) 00:31, 24 April 2026 (UTC)

Proposed deletion ↗ of :Upham F.C. ↗

left|link=|alt=Notice|48px| ↗

The article :Upham F.C. ↗ has been proposed for deletion ↗ because of the following concern:
<blockquote>'''Fails the generally accepted cut-off point ↗ for English football club notability (playing at step 6 or in the FA Cup/FA Vase, and no evidence of GNG being met.'''</blockquote>

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary ↗ or on the article's talk page ↗.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process ↗, but other deletion process ↗es exist. In particular, articles for deletion ↗ allows discussion to reach consensus ↗ for deletion based on established criteria ↗.

If the proposed deletion has already been carried out, you may request undeletion ↗ of the article at any time.

This is an automated notification. Please refer to the page's history ↗ for further information. DatBot (talk) 00:31, 24 April 2026 (UTC)

Proposed deletion ↗ of :Four Marks F.C. ↗

left|link=|alt=Notice|48px| ↗

The article :Four Marks F.C. ↗ has been proposed for deletion ↗ because of the following concern:
<blockquote>'''Fails the generally accepted cut-off point ↗ for English football club notability (playing at step 6 or in the FA Cup/FA Vase, and no evidence of GNG being met.'''</blockquote>

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary ↗ or on the article's talk page ↗.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process ↗, but other deletion process ↗es exist. In particular, articles for deletion ↗ allows discussion to reach consensus ↗ for deletion based on established criteria ↗.

If the proposed deletion has already been carried out, you may request undeletion ↗ of the article at any time.

This is an automated notification. Please refer to the page's history ↗ for further information. DatBot (talk) 00:31, 24 April 2026 (UTC)

Proposed deletion ↗ of :Micheldever F.C. ↗

left|link=|alt=Notice|48px| ↗

The article :Micheldever F.C. ↗ has been proposed for deletion ↗ because of the following concern:
<blockquote>'''Fails the generally accepted cut-off point ↗ for English football club notability (playing at step 6 or in the FA Cup/FA Vase, and no evidence of GNG being met.'''</blockquote>

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary ↗ or on the article's talk page ↗.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process ↗, but other deletion process ↗es exist. In particular, articles for deletion ↗ allows discussion to reach consensus ↗ for deletion based on established criteria ↗.

If the proposed deletion has already been carried out, you may request undeletion ↗ of the article at any time.

This is an automated notification. Please refer to the page's history ↗ for further information. DatBot (talk) 00:31, 24 April 2026 (UTC)

Proposed deletion ↗ of :East Lodge F.C. ↗

left|link=|alt=Notice|48px| ↗

The article :East Lodge F.C. ↗ has been proposed for deletion ↗ because of the following concern:
<blockquote>'''Fails the generally accepted cut-off point ↗ for English football club notability (playing at step 6 or in the FA Cup/FA Vase, and no evidence of GNG being met.'''</blockquote>

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary ↗ or on the article's talk page ↗.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process ↗, but other deletion process ↗es exist. In particular, articles for deletion ↗ allows discussion to reach consensus ↗ for deletion based on established criteria ↗.

If the proposed deletion has already been carried out, you may request undeletion ↗ of the article at any time.

This is an automated notification. Please refer to the page's history ↗ for further information. DatBot (talk) 00:31, 24 April 2026 (UTC)

Proposed deletion ↗ of :Basing Rovers F.C. ↗

left|link=|alt=Notice|48px| ↗

The article :Basing Rovers F.C. ↗ has been proposed for deletion ↗ because of the following concern:
<blockquote>'''Fails the generally accepted cut-off point ↗ for English football club notability (playing at step 6 or in the FA Cup/FA Vase, and no evidence of GNG being met.'''</blockquote>

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary ↗ or on the article's talk page ↗.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process ↗, but other deletion process ↗es exist. In particular, articles for deletion ↗ allows discussion to reach consensus ↗ for deletion based on established criteria ↗.

If the proposed deletion has already been carried out, you may request undeletion ↗ of the article at any time.

This is an automated notification. Please refer to the page's history ↗ for further information. DatBot (talk) 00:31, 24 April 2026 (UTC)

Proposed deletion ↗ of :Malshanger Sports F.C. ↗

left|link=|alt=Notice|48px| ↗

The article :Malshanger Sports F.C. ↗ has been proposed for deletion ↗ because of the following concern:
<blockquote>'''Fails the generally accepted cut-off point ↗ for English football club notability (playing at step 6 or in the FA Cup/FA Vase, and no evidence of GNG being met.'''</blockquote>

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary ↗ or on the article's talk page ↗.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process ↗, but other deletion process ↗es exist. In particular, articles for deletion ↗ allows discussion to reach consensus ↗ for deletion based on established criteria ↗.

If the proposed deletion has already been carried out, you may request undeletion ↗ of the article at any time.

This is an automated notification. Please refer to the page's history ↗ for further information. DatBot (talk) 00:31, 24 April 2026 (UTC)

Proposed deletion ↗ of :New Milton F.C. (1898) ↗

left|link=|alt=Notice|48px| ↗

The article :New Milton F.C. (1898) ↗ has been proposed for deletion ↗ because of the following concern:
<blockquote>'''Fails the generally accepted cut-off point ↗ for English football club notability (playing at step 6 or in the FA Cup/FA Vase, and no evidence of GNG being met.'''</blockquote>

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary ↗ or on the article's talk page ↗.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process ↗, but other deletion process ↗es exist. In particular, articles for deletion ↗ allows discussion to reach consensus ↗ for deletion based on established criteria ↗.

If the proposed deletion has already been carried out, you may request undeletion ↗ of the article at any time.

This is an automated notification. Please refer to the page's history ↗ for further information. DatBot (talk) 00:31, 24 April 2026 (UTC)

Proposed deletion ↗ of :Bass Alton F.C. ↗

left|link=|alt=Notice|48px| ↗

The article :Bass Alton F.C. ↗ has been proposed for deletion ↗ because of the following concern:
<blockquote>'''Fails the generally accepted cut-off point ↗ for English football club notability (playing at step 6 or in the FA Cup/FA Vase, and no evidence of GNG being met.'''</blockquote>

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary ↗ or on the article's talk page ↗.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process ↗, but other deletion process ↗es exist. In particular, articles for deletion ↗ allows discussion to reach consensus ↗ for deletion based on established criteria ↗.

If the proposed deletion has already been carried out, you may request undeletion ↗ of the article at any time.

This is an automated notification. Please refer to the page's history ↗ for further information. DatBot (talk) 00:31, 24 April 2026 (UTC)

Proposed deletion ↗ of :Bournemouth Electric F.C. ↗

left|link=|alt=Notice|48px| ↗

The article :Bournemouth Electric F.C. ↗ has been proposed for deletion ↗ because of the following concern:
<blockquote>'''Fails the generally accepted cut-off point ↗ for English football club notability (playing at step 6 or in the FA Cup/FA Vase, and no evidence of GNG being met.'''</blockquote>

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary ↗ or on the article's talk page ↗.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process ↗, but other deletion process ↗es exist. In particular, articles for deletion ↗ allows discussion to reach consensus ↗ for deletion based on established criteria ↗.

If the proposed deletion has already been carried out, you may request undeletion ↗ of the article at any time.

This is an automated notification. Please refer to the page's history ↗ for further information. DatBot (talk) 00:31, 24 April 2026 (UTC)

Proposed deletion ↗ of :Parley F.C. ↗

left|link=|alt=Notice|48px| ↗

The article :Parley F.C. ↗ has been proposed for deletion ↗ because of the following concern:
<blockquote>'''Fails the generally accepted cut-off point ↗ for English football club notability (playing at step 6 or in the FA Cup/FA Vase, and no evidence of GNG being met.'''</blockquote>

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary ↗ or on the article's talk page ↗.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process ↗, but other deletion process ↗es exist. In particular, articles for deletion ↗ allows discussion to reach consensus ↗ for deletion based on established criteria ↗.

If the proposed deletion has already been carried out, you may request undeletion ↗ of the article at any time.

This is an automated notification. Please refer to the page's history ↗ for further information. DatBot (talk) 00:31, 24 April 2026 (UTC)

Football club notability

Hello. Please could you stop creating (and removing proposed deletion templates from) articles on clubs who have never played at what is now step 6 or or above. We have nearly two decades of deletion discussions on English football clubs and there is clear consensus that a club that has never played at step 6 or in the FA Cup/Vase is not notable, except in exceptional circumstances (for example, Wallsend Boys Club). Cheers, <span style="color: orange;">Number</span> <span style="color: green;">5</span><span style="color: blue;">7</span> ↗ 19:52, 25 April 2026 (UTC)

:Dear sir, I am sorry that these articles are not acceptable and will not be doing anymore. However, please do not delete Hedge End Rangers, AFC Netley and Fordingbridge Turks. I have short notes explaining why I think these should remain. If you need anymore information, please let me know. Thank you. Wfclegend (talk) 13:09, 11 May 2026 (UTC)

Proposed deletion ↗ of :Otterbourne F.C. ↗

left|link=|alt=Notice|48px| ↗

The article :Otterbourne F.C. ↗ has been proposed for deletion ↗ because of the following concern:
<blockquote>'''Fails the generally accepted cut-off point ↗ for English football club notability (playing at step 6 or in the FA Cup/FA Vase, and no evidence of GNG being met.'''</blockquote>

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary ↗ or on the article's talk page ↗.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process ↗, but other deletion process ↗es exist. In particular, articles for deletion ↗ allows discussion to reach consensus ↗ for deletion based on established criteria ↗.

If the proposed deletion has already been carried out, you may request undeletion ↗ of the article at any time.

This is an automated notification. Please refer to the page's history ↗ for further information. DatBot (talk) 00:31, 12 May 2026 (UTC)

Proposed deletion ↗ of :A.F.C. Netley ↗

left|link=|alt=Notice|48px| ↗

The article :A.F.C. Netley ↗ has been proposed for deletion ↗ because of the following concern:
<blockquote>'''Fails the generally accepted cut-off point ↗ for English football club notability (playing at step 6 or in the FA Cup/FA Vase, and no evidence of GNG being met.'''</blockquote>

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary ↗ or on the article's talk page ↗.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process ↗, but other deletion process ↗es exist. In particular, articles for deletion ↗ allows discussion to reach consensus ↗ for deletion based on established criteria ↗.

If the proposed deletion has already been carried out, you may request undeletion ↗ of the article at any time.

This is an automated notification. Please refer to the page's history ↗ for further information. DatBot (talk) 00:31, 12 May 2026 (UTC)

Proposed deletion ↗ of :West Wight F.C. ↗

left|link=|alt=Notice|48px| ↗

The article :West Wight F.C. ↗ has been proposed for deletion ↗ because of the following concern:
<blockquote>'''Fails the generally accepted cut-off point ↗ for English football club notability (playing at step 6 or in the FA Cup/FA Vase, and no evidence of GNG being met.'''</blockquote>

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary ↗ or on the article's talk page ↗.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process ↗, but other deletion process ↗es exist. In particular, articles for deletion ↗ allows discussion to reach consensus ↗ for deletion based on established criteria ↗.

If the proposed deletion has already been carried out, you may request undeletion ↗ of the article at any time.

This is an automated notification. Please refer to the page's history ↗ for further information. DatBot (talk) 00:31, 12 May 2026 (UTC)

Proposed deletion ↗ of :Michelmersh & Timsbury F.C. ↗

left|link=|alt=Notice|48px| ↗

The article :Michelmersh & Timsbury F.C. ↗ has been proposed for deletion ↗ because of the following concern:
<blockquote>'''Fails the generally accepted cut-off point ↗ for English football club notability (playing at step 6 or in the FA Cup/FA Vase, and no evidence of GNG being met.'''</blockquote>

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary ↗ or on the article's talk page ↗.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process ↗, but other deletion process ↗es exist. In particular, articles for deletion ↗ allows discussion to reach consensus ↗ for deletion based on established criteria ↗.

If the proposed deletion has already been carried out, you may request undeletion ↗ of the article at any time.

This is an automated notification. Please refer to the page's history ↗ for further information. DatBot (talk) 00:31, 12 May 2026 (UTC)

Proposed deletion ↗ of :Ventnor F.C. ↗

left|link=|alt=Notice|48px| ↗

The article :Ventnor F.C. ↗ has been proposed for deletion ↗ because of the following concern:
<blockquote>'''Fails the generally accepted cut-off point ↗ for English football club notability (playing at step 6 or in the FA Cup/FA Vase, and no evidence of GNG being met.'''</blockquote>

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary ↗ or on the article's talk page ↗.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process ↗, but other deletion process ↗es exist. In particular, articles for deletion ↗ allows discussion to reach consensus ↗ for deletion based on established criteria ↗.

If the proposed deletion has already been carried out, you may request undeletion ↗ of the article at any time.

This is an automated notification. Please refer to the page's history ↗ for further information. DatBot (talk) 00:31, 12 May 2026 (UTC)

Proposed deletion ↗ of :Shanklin F.C. ↗

left|link=|alt=Notice|48px| ↗

The article :Shanklin F.C. ↗ has been proposed for deletion ↗ because of the following concern:
<blockquote>'''Fails the generally accepted cut-off point ↗ for English football club notability (playing at step 6 or in the FA Cup/FA Vase, and no evidence of GNG being met.'''</blockquote>

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary ↗ or on the article's talk page ↗.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process ↗, but other deletion process ↗es exist. In particular, articles for deletion ↗ allows discussion to reach consensus ↗ for deletion based on established criteria ↗.

If the proposed deletion has already been carried out, you may request undeletion ↗ of the article at any time.

This is an automated notification. Please refer to the page's history ↗ for further information. DatBot (talk) 00:31, 12 May 2026 (UTC)

Proposed deletion ↗ of :Mottisfont F.C. ↗

left|link=|alt=Notice|48px| ↗

The article :Mottisfont F.C. ↗ has been proposed for deletion ↗ because of the following concern:
<blockquote>'''Fails the generally accepted cut-off point ↗ for English football club notability (playing at step 6 or in the FA Cup/FA Vase, and no evidence of GNG being met.'''</blockquote>

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary ↗ or on the article's talk page ↗.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process ↗, but other deletion process ↗es exist. In particular, articles for deletion ↗ allows discussion to reach consensus ↗ for deletion based on established criteria ↗.

If the proposed deletion has already been carried out, you may request undeletion ↗ of the article at any time.

This is an automated notification. Please refer to the page's history ↗ for further information. DatBot (talk) 00:31, 12 May 2026 (UTC)

Proposed deletion ↗ of :Liphook United F.C. ↗

left|link=|alt=Notice|48px| ↗

The article :Liphook United F.C. ↗ has been proposed for deletion ↗ because of the following concern:
<blockquote>'''Fails the generally accepted cut-off point ↗ for English football club notability (playing at step 6 or in the FA Cup/FA Vase, and no evidence of GNG being met.'''</blockquote>

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary ↗ or on the article's talk page ↗.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process ↗, but other deletion process ↗es exist. In particular, articles for deletion ↗ allows discussion to reach consensus ↗ for deletion based on established criteria ↗.

If the proposed deletion has already been carried out, you may request undeletion ↗ of the article at any time.

This is an automated notification. Please refer to the page's history ↗ for further information. DatBot (talk) 00:31, 12 May 2026 (UTC)

Proposed deletion ↗ of :Nursling & Shirley F.C. ↗

left|link=|alt=Notice|48px| ↗

The article :Nursling & Shirley F.C. ↗ has been proposed for deletion ↗ because of the following concern:
<blockquote>'''Fails the generally accepted cut-off point ↗ for English football club notability (playing at step 6 or in the FA Cup/FA Vase, and no evidence of GNG being met.'''</blockquote>

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary ↗ or on the article's talk page ↗.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process ↗, but other deletion process ↗es exist. In particular, articles for deletion ↗ allows discussion to reach consensus ↗ for deletion based on established criteria ↗.

If the proposed deletion has already been carried out, you may request undeletion ↗ of the article at any time.

This is an automated notification. Please refer to the page's history ↗ for further information. DatBot (talk) 00:31, 12 May 2026 (UTC)

Proposed deletion ↗ of :Lyndhurst F.C. (Hampshire) ↗

left|link=|alt=Notice|48px| ↗

The article :Lyndhurst F.C. (Hampshire) ↗ has been proposed for deletion ↗ because of the following concern:
<blockquote>'''Fails the generally accepted cut-off point ↗ for English football club notability (playing at step 6 or in the FA Cup/FA Vase, and no evidence of GNG being met.'''</blockquote>

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary ↗ or on the article's talk page ↗.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process ↗, but other deletion process ↗es exist. In particular, articles for deletion ↗ allows discussion to reach consensus ↗ for deletion based on established criteria ↗.

If the proposed deletion has already been carried out, you may request undeletion ↗ of the article at any time.

This is an automated notification. Please refer to the page's history ↗ for further information. DatBot (talk) 00:31, 12 May 2026 (UTC)

Proposed deletion ↗ of :Durley F.C. ↗

left|link=|alt=Notice|48px| ↗

The article :Durley F.C. ↗ has been proposed for deletion ↗ because of the following concern:
<blockquote>'''Fails the generally accepted cut-off point ↗ for English football club notability (playing at step 6 or in the FA Cup/FA Vase, and no evidence of GNG being met.'''</blockquote>

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary ↗ or on the article's talk page ↗.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process ↗, but other deletion process ↗es exist. In particular, articles for deletion ↗ allows discussion to reach consensus ↗ for deletion based on established criteria ↗.

If the proposed deletion has already been carried out, you may request undeletion ↗ of the article at any time.

This is an automated notification. Please refer to the page's history ↗ for further information. DatBot (talk) 00:31, 12 May 2026 (UTC)

Proposed deletion ↗ of :Warsash F.C. ↗

left|link=|alt=Notice|48px| ↗

The article :Warsash F.C. ↗ has been proposed for deletion ↗ because of the following concern:
<blockquote>'''Fails the generally accepted cut-off point ↗ for English football club notability (playing at step 6 or in the FA Cup/FA Vase, and no evidence of GNG being met.'''</blockquote>

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary ↗ or on the article's talk page ↗.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process ↗, but other deletion process ↗es exist. In particular, articles for deletion ↗ allows discussion to reach consensus ↗ for deletion based on established criteria ↗.

If the proposed deletion has already been carried out, you may request undeletion ↗ of the article at any time.

This is an automated notification. Please refer to the page's history ↗ for further information. DatBot (talk) 00:31, 12 May 2026 (UTC)

Proposed deletion ↗ of :A.C. Delco F.C. (Eastleigh) ↗

left|link=|alt=Notice|48px| ↗

The article :A.C. Delco F.C. (Eastleigh) ↗ has been proposed for deletion ↗ because of the following concern:
<blockquote>'''Fails the generally accepted cut-off point ↗ for English football club notability (playing at step 6 or in the FA Cup/FA Vase, and no evidence of GNG being met.'''</blockquote>

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary ↗ or on the article's talk page ↗.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process ↗, but other deletion process ↗es exist. In particular, articles for deletion ↗ allows discussion to reach consensus ↗ for deletion based on established criteria ↗.

If the proposed deletion has already been carried out, you may request undeletion ↗ of the article at any time.

This is an automated notification. Please refer to the page's history ↗ for further information. DatBot (talk) 00:31, 12 May 2026 (UTC)

Proposed deletion ↗ of :Compton F.C. (Hampshire) ↗

left|link=|alt=Notice|48px| ↗

The article :Compton F.C. (Hampshire) ↗ has been proposed for deletion ↗ because of the following concern:
<blockquote>'''Fails the generally accepted cut-off point ↗ for English football club notability (playing at step 6 or in the FA Cup/FA Vase, and no evidence of GNG being met.'''</blockquote>

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary ↗ or on the article's talk page ↗.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process ↗, but other deletion process ↗es exist. In particular, articles for deletion ↗ allows discussion to reach consensus ↗ for deletion based on established criteria ↗.

If the proposed deletion has already been carried out, you may request undeletion ↗ of the article at any time.

This is an automated notification. Please refer to the page's history ↗ for further information. DatBot (talk) 00:31, 12 May 2026 (UTC)

Proposed deletion ↗ of :Bournemouth Sports F.C. ↗

left|link=|alt=Notice|48px| ↗

The article :Bournemouth Sports F.C. ↗ has been proposed for deletion ↗ because of the following concern:
<blockquote>'''Non-notable football club, seems to be a recreation of a previously deleted article.'''</blockquote>

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary ↗ or on the article's talk page ↗.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process ↗, but other deletion process ↗es exist. In particular, articles for deletion ↗ allows discussion to reach consensus ↗ for deletion based on established criteria ↗.

If the proposed deletion has already been carried out, you may request undeletion ↗ of the article at any time. Porterjoh (talk) 03:14, 14 June 2026 (UTC)

Nomination of :Bournemouth Sports F.C. ↗ for deletion

<div class="afd-notice">
<div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0;">48px|alt=|link= ↗</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article :Bournemouth Sports F.C. ↗ is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines ↗ or whether it should be deleted ↗.

The article is being discussed at '''Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bournemouth Sports F.C.  (2nd nomination) ↗''' until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines ↗.

Users may still edit the article ↗, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the AfD notice from the article until the discussion is closed.</div> Porterjoh (talk) 14:21, 21 June 2026 (UTC)