W
Active Editors
Back to Profile

User Talk: Whathever2

Server-side rendered snapshot of this editor's Wikipedia talk page discussions.

<!-- Template from Template:Welcome-detailed -->

Welcome!


{| style="background-color:#fff; padding:0;" cellpadding="0" width="93%"
|style="border:1px solid #000; background-color:#dff2f3; vertical-align:top; color:#000000;"|
{| width="100%" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="5" style="vertical-align:top; background-color:#F5FFFA; padding:0;"
| <div style="margin:0; background-color:#CEF2E0; border:1px solid #000; text-align:left; padding-left:0.4em; padding-top:0.2em; padding-bottom:0.2em;">
right|210px ↗
{{resize|97%|Hello, Whathever2}}, and welcome ↗ to Wikipedia ↗. Thank you for your contributions ↗ to the encyclopedia. If you need assistance, check out the ''Getting Help'' section below or place {{tl|Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name ↗ on talk pages by using four tildes (<nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>), which will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please always fill in the edit summary ↗ field to describe your edits. Below are some useful links to help you get started. '''Jetstreamer'''&nbsp;''{{sup|Talk}}'' 12:59, 23 January 2024 (UTC)</div>
|}

{| width="100%" style="background-color:#F5FFFA;"
|style="width: 49%; border:1px solid #FFFFFF; background-color:#F5FFFA; vertical-align:top"|
{| width="100%" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="5" style="vertical-align:top; background-color:#F5FFFA"
! <div style="margin: 0; background-color:#cef2f3; font-family: sans-serif; font-size:97%; font-weight:bold; border:1px solid #000000; text-align:left; color:#000000; padding-left:0.4em; padding-top: 0.2em; padding-bottom: 0.2em;">Getting started</div>
|-
| style="color:#000; font-size:97%"|
|-
!<div style="margin: 0; background-color:#cef2f3; font-family: sans-serif; font-size:97%; font-weight:bold; border:1px solid #000000; text-align:left; color:#000000; padding-left:0.4em; padding-top: 0.2em; padding-bottom: 0.2em;">Getting help</div>
|-
| style="color:#000; font-size:97%"|
|-
!<div style="margin: 0; background-color:#cef2f3; font-family: sans-serif; font-size:97%; font-weight:bold; border:1px solid #000000; text-align:left; color:#000000; padding-left:0.4em; padding-top: 0.2em; padding-bottom: 0.2em;">Policies and guidelines</div>
|-
| style="color:#000; font-size:97%"|
<hr />
|-
|}
|class="MainPageBG" style="width: 49%; border:1px solid #FFFFFF; background-color:#F5FFFA; vertical-align:top"|
{| width="100%" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="5" style="vertical-align:top; background-color:#F5FFFA"
|-
!<div style="margin: 0; background-color:#cef2f3; font-family: sans-serif; font-size:97%; font-weight:bold; border:1px solid #000000; text-align:left; color:#000000; padding-left:0.4em; padding-top: 0.2em; padding-bottom: 0.2em;">Writing articles</div>
|-
| style="color:#000; font-size:97%"|
|-
!<div style="margin: 0; background-color:#cef2f3; font-family: sans-serif; font-size:97%; font-weight:bold; border:1px solid #000000; text-align:left; color:#000000; padding-left:0.4em; padding-top: 0.2em; padding-bottom: 0.2em;">The community</div>
|-
| style="color:#000; font-size:97%"|
|-
!<div style="margin: 0; background-color:#cef2f3; font-family: sans-serif; font-size:97%; font-weight:bold; border:1px solid #000000; text-align:left; color:#000000; padding-left:0.4em; padding-top: 0.2em; padding-bottom: 0.2em;">Miscellaneous</div>
|-
| style="color:#000; font-size:97%"|
|-
|}
|}
|}<!--Template from Template:Welcome-detailed--> '''Jetstreamer'''&nbsp;''{{sup|Talk}}'' 12:59, 23 January 2024 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 15



Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Bartolomeu de Gusmão ↗, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ballon ↗. Such links are usually incorrect ↗, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. <small>(Read the FAQ{{*}} Join us at the DPL WikiProject ↗.)</small>

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 19:24, 15 July 2024 (UTC)

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message



<div class="ivmbox " style="margin-bottom: 1em; border: 1px solid #a2a9b1; background-color: #fdf2d5; padding: 0.5em; display: flex; align-items: center; ">
<div class="ivmbox-image noresize" style="padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em;">40px ↗</div>
<div class="ivmbox-text">
Hello! Voting in the '''2024 Arbitration Committee elections ↗''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2024|end}}-1 day}}. All '''eligible users ↗''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee ↗ is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process ↗. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans ↗, topic bans ↗, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy ↗ describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates ↗ and submit your choices on the '''2024|poll}}|voting page ↗'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. <small>MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:53, 19 November 2024 (UTC)</small>

</div>
</div>
<!-- Message sent by User:Cyberpower678@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2024/Coordination/MM/09&oldid=1258243804 -->

May 2025



25px|alt=Information icon ↗ Hello, I'm Escape Orbit. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, :2019 Lincoln Memorial confrontation ↗, but you didn't provide a reliable source ↗. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation ↗ and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners ↗. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. ''Your opinion of what events represented is irrelevant. There is absolutely nothing in the article, either cited or not, that discusses anti catholicism.'' <!-- Template:uw-unsourced1 --> <span style="color: green;">Escape Orbit</span> <sup>(Talk) ↗</sup> 05:32, 25 May 2025 (UTC)

:I provided the sources for my edition and my edition was accepted and still remains in place as of 07 February 2026. Whathever2 (talk) 07:07, 7 February 2026 (UTC)

June 2025




25px|alt=Information icon ↗ Hi Whathever2! I noticed that you have reverted to restore your preferred version of :Template:Persecutions of the Catholic Church sidebar ↗ several times. The impulse to undo an edit you disagree with is understandable, but I wanted to make sure you're aware that the edit warring policy ↗ disallows repeated reversions even if they are justifiable.

All editors are expected to discuss content disputes on article talk pages ↗ to try to reach consensus ↗. If you are unable to agree&#32;at {{TALKPAGENAME:Template:Persecutions of the Catholic Church sidebar}} ↗, please use one of the dispute resolution options ↗ to seek input from others. Using this approach instead of reverting can help you avoid getting drawn into an edit war. Thank you.<!-- Template:uw-ewsoft --> Pbritti (talk) 12:03, 10 June 2025 (UTC)

September 2025



25px|alt=Information icon ↗ Hello, I'm Danners430. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, :Pilatus PC-24 ↗, but you didn't provide a reliable source ↗. On Wikipedia, it's important that article content be verifiable ↗. If you'd like to resubmit your change with a citation ↗, your edit is archived in the page history ↗. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. <!-- Template:uw-unsourced1 --> <span class="nowrap"><span style="color: RebeccaPurple">Danners430</span> <sub>tweaks made ↗</sub></span> 15:01, 12 September 2025 (UTC)

25px|alt=Information icon ↗ Please do not add or change content, as you did at :Mexicana de Aviación (2023–present) ↗, without citing a reliable source ↗. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources ↗ to see how to add references to an article. Thank you.<!-- Template:uw-unsourced2 --> <span class="nowrap"><span style="color: RebeccaPurple">Danners430</span> <sub>tweaks made ↗</sub></span> 20:49, 15 September 2025 (UTC)

October 2025



30px|alt=Stop icon ↗ Your editing history at :UFC rankings ↗ shows that you are currently engaged in an '''edit war ↗'''. That means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Instead of reverting edits, please ''stop editing the page'' and discuss on the '''talk page ↗''' to create a version of the page that represents consensus ↗ among the editors involved. Wikipedia provides a page explaining how this is accomplished ↗. If discussions reach an impasse, you can request help at a relevant noticeboard ↗ or seek dispute resolution ↗ such as a Third opinion ↗. In some cases, you may wish to request page protection ↗ while a discussion to resolve the dispute is ongoing.

'''If you continue edit warring, you may be blocked from editing ↗ Wikipedia'''&mdash;especially if you break the three-revert rule ↗, which states that an editor ''must not perform more than three reverts ↗ on a single page within a 24-hour period''. Undoing another editor's work&mdash;whether in whole or in part, or whether it involves the same or different material each time&mdash;counts as a revert. Also, please keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;'''even if you do not violate the three-revert rule'''&mdash; if it looks like you intend to continue reverting.<!-- Template:uw-3rr --> Nswix (talk) 21:56, 28 October 2025 (UTC)

:In the end my editions were all accepted and remained because I was just being consistent with the truth. I was just being fair and using the same criteria of nationality that was applied to other fighters such as Topuria. I was threatened with a blocking by some people like this guy above for simply being logical and fair. I was not being disruptive, I was only making a fair edition in good faith and supported by verifiable sources, some users disagreed by personal reasons and they were the ones who pushed for a edit war. Whathever2 (talk) 07:04, 7 February 2026 (UTC)

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion


link=|25px|alt=Information icon ↗
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring ↗ regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring ↗. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Whathever2 reported by User:Nswix (Result: ) ↗. <!--Template:An3-notice--> Thank you. Nswix (talk) 15:22, 29 October 2025 (UTC)

November 2025



25px|alt=Warning icon ↗ Please stop. If you continue to remove maintenance templates ↗ without resolving the problem that the template refers to, as you did at :Taurus Armas ↗, you may be blocked from editing ↗. <!-- Template:uw-tdel3 --> <span style="color:red">⇒</span><span style="font-family:Serif"><span style="color:black">SWAT</span><span style="color:goldenrod">Jester</span></span> ↗ <small><sup>Shoot Blues, Tell VileRat!</sup></small> 01:16, 9 November 2025 (UTC)

30px|link=|alt=Copyright problem icon ↗ Your edit to :Taurus Armas ↗ has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted ↗ material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission ↗ from the copyright holder. If you {{em|are}} the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials ↗ for information on how to contribute your work appropriately. For legal reasons, Wikipedia strictly cannot host copyrighted text or images from print media or digital platforms without an appropriate ↗ and verifiable license. Contributions infringing on copyright will be removed. You may use external websites or publications as a source of {{em|information}}, but not as a source of {{em|content}}, such as sentences or images&mdash;you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy '''will be blocked from editing ↗'''. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources ↗ for more information. ''Please note that deceptively tagging content as being freely licensed when no such license release exists is highly disruptive and will result in a permanent revocation of your editing privileges. Do not do this again.''<!-- Template:uw-copyright --> <span style="color:red">⇒</span><span style="font-family:Serif"><span style="color:black">SWAT</span><span style="color:goldenrod">Jester</span></span> ↗ <small><sup>Shoot Blues, Tell VileRat!</sup></small> 01:18, 9 November 2025 (UTC)

<div class="user-block" style="padding: 5px; margin-bottom: 0.5em; border: 1px solid var(--border-color-base, #a2ab91); background-color: var(--background-color-warning-subtle, #fef6e7); color:inherit; min-height: 40px">40px|left|alt=Stop icon with clock ↗<div style="margin-left:45px">You have been '''blocked ↗''' from editing for a period of '''1 week''' for persistently making disruptive edits ↗. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions ↗. </div><div style="margin-left:45px">If you believe that there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks ↗, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. --><code><nowiki>{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}</nowiki></code>. &nbsp;<span style="color:red">⇒</span><span style="font-family:Serif"><span style="color:black">SWAT</span><span style="color:goldenrod">Jester</span></span> ↗ <small><sup>Shoot Blues, Tell VileRat!</sup></small> 01:23, 9 November 2025 (UTC)</div></div><!-- Template:uw-disruptblock -->
:You have a long history of disruption on this project, and a recent review of your editing history shows me copyright violations, unexplained blankings of sourced content, repeated addition of unsourced content, and other unconstructive behavior that indicates that you either lack the capability to effectively contribute to this project, or are intentionally being disruptive and vandalizing it. Take this timeout to review our policies and self-reflect on how you can do better; and please take this seriously, as the next time it will be an indefinite block. <span style="color:red">⇒</span><span style="font-family:Serif"><span style="color:black">SWAT</span><span style="color:goldenrod">Jester</span></span> ↗ <small><sup>Shoot Blues, Tell VileRat!</sup></small> 01:25, 9 November 2025 (UTC)
::It's clear that this behavior has continued. Stop refusing to engage in discussion, contradicting sourcing, and engaging in edit wars. You will be blocked for an extended period time if you fail to reform your behavior. Best, ~ Pbritti (talk) 23:05, 24 November 2025 (UTC)
:::It's clear that you're not engaging in good faith, this was already discussed before, all the editions that I did are legit and point to pages that show episodes of persecution against Catholics and their Church. You could just stop being lazy and read the pages to see for yourself that these are all coherent and justified in the context of the persecution template, and don't violate any wiki rules. How can you deny that a terrorist attack against a catholic church is NOT a case of persecution against the Catholic Church? And I have not included all the cases, I have only included cases that were big and could not be ignored. Again, it's very clear for anyone with common sense and that is not being dishonest. Also are you a "catholic"? I see in your page you claim to be "catholic", very "catholic' of your part to threaten to block someone for editions that you have not even verified. Whathever2 (talk) 00:18, 25 November 2025 (UTC)
:::You're also abusing the verifiability ONUS flag. This exist for requiring justification in disputed and controversial content, but that's not the case here, basically all my inclusions are self evident, evidence for their inclusion is presented in the pages of the articles that were included, you just have to read them to find the sources and see for yourself if it was really a case of persecution or not. And this should be done in a case by case basis. Also I don't see a crowd of users disputing my inclusions as controversial, for the contrary they stayed up for much time with other editors working on the article and no one disputed the contents that I included, it appears that only you have this odd interpretation that all my inclusions are controversial and disputed. Whathever2 (talk) 01:05, 25 November 2025 (UTC)
::::{{tps}} It only needs one (1) editor to disagree with your additions. That is all that's required, and they are perfectly entitled to disagree. It is your responsibility, as it is theirs, to engage in civil ↗ discussion to discuss the disagreement. Comments like {{tq|You could just stop being lazy}} and {{tq|it's very clear for anyone with common sense and that is not being dishonest}} are fundamentally unacceptable, as they not only violate WP:CIVIL ↗, that's also '''you''' not assuming good faith ↗. As for verifiability, I don't know what's been going on but it's simple - if you add or change content, you must source those changes (or make a note in the edit summary that the edits are based on an existing source(s)). ONUS is about the onus being on yourself as the party adding or changing content to provide a source.
::::My suggestion, from a standpoint of not being involved in this dispute, is to stop, take a step back, and start a meaningful discussion on the article talk page. It would also be in your favour to recognise some of the uncivil comments above and strike them. Content disputes like this happen all the time on Wikipedia - they're not bad, they're not unusual, and they're easily resolved by discussion. Don't let something silly like this get you banned. <span class="nowrap"><span style="color: RebeccaPurple">Danners430</span> <sub>tweaks made ↗</sub></span> 09:47, 25 November 2025 (UTC)
:::::If you "don't know what's been going on" by your own words you should refrain from comment or taking side in this discussion. Here we have a person that is denying that the Armenian Genocide was also a persecution against the Catholic Church, when most scholars agree that this a clear case of persecution against the Catholic Church, there was systematic not only killings against church members and clergy but also physical destruction of Churches and legal persecution, this is well documented. He is just abusing his power to control the narrative by some personal ulterior motive, again he's just abusing his power and situations like this has become the norm in wikipedia, a few mods control the flow of information and structure on how information should be presented even in detriment of the truth. And yes, he's being dishonest, this is literally a textbook case of intellectual dishonest. Whathever2 (talk) 06:55, 7 February 2026 (UTC)

30px|alt=Stop icon ↗ '''You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war ↗, according to the reverts you've made to :Template:Persecutions of the Catholic Church sidebar ↗.''' This means that you are repeatedly reverting content back to how you think it should be, despite knowing that other editors disagree. Once it is known that there is a disagreement, users are expected to collaborate ↗ with others, avoid editing disruptively ↗, and try to reach a consensus ↗ – rather than repeatedly reverting the changes made by other users.

Important points to note:
# {{strong|Edit warring is disruptive behavior ↗ – regardless of how many reverts you have made;}}
# {{strong|Do not engage in edit warring – even if you believe that you are right.}}
You need to discuss the disagreement on the article's talk page ↗ and work towards a revision that represents consensus among everyone involved. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard ↗ or seek dispute resolution ↗ if discussions reach an impasse. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection ↗. {{strong|If you continue to engage in edit warring, you may be blocked ↗ from editing.}} ''~''<!-- Template:uw-ew --> Pbritti (talk) 01:42, 25 November 2025 (UTC)

ArbCom 2025 Elections voter message



<div class="ivmbox " style="margin-bottom: 1em; border: 1px solid #a2a9b1; background-color: #fdf2d5; padding: 0.5em; display: flex; align-items: center; ">
<div class="ivmbox-image" style="padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em;flex-basis: 40px">40px ↗</div>
<div class="ivmbox-text">
Hello! Voting in the '''2025 Arbitration Committee elections ↗''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2025|end}}-1 day}}. All '''eligible users ↗''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee ↗ is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process ↗. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans ↗, topic bans ↗, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy ↗ describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please review the candidates ↗ and submit your choices on the '''2025|poll}}|voting page ↗'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. <small>MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:59, 18 November 2025 (UTC)</small>

</div>
</div>
<!-- Message sent by User:Cyberpower678@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2025/Coordination/MM/08&oldid=1322758940 -->

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion 2


link=|25px|alt=Information icon ↗
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring ↗ regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring ↗. <!--Template:An3-notice--> Thank you. IDontDoDoja (talk) 17:12, 8 February 2026 (UTC)

February 2026



30px|alt=Stop icon ↗ '''You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war ↗, according to the reverts you've made to :Senna Tower ↗.''' This means that you are repeatedly reverting content back to how you think it should be, despite knowing that other editors disagree. Once it is known that there is a disagreement, users are expected to collaborate ↗ with others, avoid editing disruptively ↗, and try to reach a consensus ↗ – rather than repeatedly reverting the changes made by other users.

Important points to note:
# {{strong|Edit warring is disruptive behavior ↗ – regardless of how many reverts you have made;}}
# {{strong|Do not engage in edit warring – even if you believe that you are right.}}
You need to discuss the disagreement on the article's talk page ↗ and work towards a revision that represents consensus among everyone involved. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard ↗ or seek dispute resolution ↗ if discussions reach an impasse. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection ↗. {{strong|If you continue to engage in edit warring, you may be blocked ↗ from editing.}} <!-- Template:uw-ew --> The Bushranger <sub><span style="color: maroon;">One ping only</span></sub> 02:11, 10 February 2026 (UTC)

<div class="user-block uw-pblock" style="padding: 5px; margin-bottom: 0.5em; border: 1px solid var(--border-color-base, #a2ab91); background-color: var(--background-color-warning-subtle, #fef6e7); color:inherit; min-height: 40px">40px|left|alt=Stop icon with clock ↗<div style="margin-left:45px">You have been '''blocked ↗''' from editing from certain pages (:Senna Tower ↗) for a period of '''1 month''' for edit warring ↗. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions ↗. </div><div style="margin-left:45px">During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes ↗ and seek consensus ↗. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution ↗, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection ↗.</div><div style="margin-left:45px">If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks ↗, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. Do not include the "tlx|" code. --><code><nowiki>{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}</nowiki></code>. &nbsp;&#126; ToBeFree (talk) 20:54, 14 February 2026 (UTC)</div></div><!-- Template:uw-ewpblock -->

:It's sad that this is what wikipedia has become, a place when admin cannot even verify a source to see if it's true or not. There can be no consensus possibility when the other user is not engaging in good faith and has openly lied about the source I provided. Also why only I'm being blocked if the other user is also committing edit warring?
:I have provided sources for my claim. Senna Tower is already under construction, there's even a video on the source I linked showing the active construction site. The construction started almost 5 months ago, and is in the foundation phase more specifically. Anyone can verify this on youtube, just search for: "Execution of the Foundations of the SENNA TOWER - Diaphragm Wall". There's many sources documenting the under construction status of this building, from articles to videos. The other user just refuses to verify them, and he even lied about the contents of the article I linked, saying that it doesn't say that the construction started. This is a lie not only the article states clearly that the construction started it even has an embedded video showing the machines working on the soil to prepare the diaphragm wall.
:In resume all my edition are made in good faith, and my claim is supported by the source I provided. The source can be verified by anyone, just open the link read the article and watch the video embedded.
:Some additional sources and evidence of my claim that this building is under construction:
:
:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lo1ojHC0Zvw
:
:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KmPY0eKABIk
:
:https://ndmais.com.br/economia/senna-tower-comecam-em-sc-as-obras-do-residencial-mais-alto-do-mundo/ (in portuguese)
:https://en.clickpetroleoegas.com.br/Scene-Tower%3A-See-how-the-tallest-residential-building-in-the-world-is-being-built-in-Balne%C3%A1rio-Cambori%C3%BA--with-a-foundation-40-meters-deep.-MHBB01/ Whathever2 (talk) 21:35, 14 February 2026 (UTC)
::{{tps}} I don't wish to take sides or wade into this dispute - however, ToBeFree has only blocked you from one specific page for a month in order to stop an edit war. He's not saying you are right or wrong when it comes to the content you are trying to add, alter or remove, he's only saying you need to stop edit warring and discuss with other editors on the talk page. Edit warring, whether you're right or wrong, is inherently disruptive - and when you find yourself in one, you need to stop and discuss on the article talk page to find a consensus. If that fails, there are other avenues open to you - see WP:DR ↗ for example. <span class="nowrap"><span style="color: RebeccaPurple">Danners430</span> <sub>tweaks made ↗</sub></span> 13:21, 15 February 2026 (UTC)

CS1 error on Embraer Legacy 450/500 and Praetor 500/600 ↗


25px|alt=|link= ↗ Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have '''automatically detected''' that this edit ↗ performed by you, on the page :Embraer Legacy 450/500 and Praetor 500/600 ↗, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive ↗, you can [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:Qwerfjkl/Botpreload&editintro=User:Qwerfjkl/Boteditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:Qwerfjkl&preloadtitle=Qwerfjkl%20(bot)%20–%20Whathever2&section=new&preloadparams%5b%5d={{FULLPAGENAMEE:Embraer Legacy 450/500 and Praetor 500/600}}&preloadparams%5b%5d=1342113195 report it to my operator].
Thanks, <!-- User:Qwerfjkl (bot)/inform -->Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 02:30, 7 March 2026 (UTC)

April 2026



25px|alt=Information icon ↗ Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at :Plinio Corrêa de Oliveira ↗. Your edits appear to be disruptive ↗ and have been or will be reverted ↗.
Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines ↗, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges ↗. Thank you.<!-- Template:uw-disruptive2 --> Ixocactus (talk) 02:05, 23 April 2026 (UTC)