W
Active Editors
Back to Profile

User Talk: Whatismyname2000

Server-side rendered snapshot of this editor's Wikipedia talk page discussions.

Bring it to the talk page


You are a completely irrational user who demonstrably has no idea about Dragomir Krančević and whose vandalism is supported by a user of your absurdity. <!-- Template:Unsigned IP --><small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding unsigned ↗ comment added by 2001:4BB8:124:B3C7:0:0:F74F:B7CD ↗ (talk) 15:54, 23 August 2025 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

You would need to bring the Djokovic greatness issue to the talk page to gauge consensus there. He is already described as the greatest by many on his article, but there are several others that have that same status, including Rod Laver. Other sports pages may be swarmed with super-fans that keep it at something that belongs at a water cooler, not an encyclopedia. Personally I'd go with Laver and Chamberlain but that's a fun silly conversation to have with friends, not really here. Fyunck(click) (talk) 07:33, 12 February 2025 (UTC)

:Fine... But Chamberlain!? Come on man. Russell is greater🙂 Whatismyname2000 (talk) 10:37, 12 February 2025 (UTC)

February 2025



25px|alt=|link= ↗ Please stop your disruptive editing ↗.
If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at :Serbia men's national basketball team ↗, you may be blocked from editing ↗. <!-- Template:uw-disruptive3 --> Drmies (talk) 01:31, 13 February 2025 (UTC)

:You want to block me!? Why? What is disruptive about my contribution. Medals won by players and coaches are facts. I have provided relevant sources for other claims. What is non-objective here? Whatismyname2000 (talk) 06:58, 13 February 2025 (UTC)


25px|alt=Information icon ↗ Hi Whatismyname2000! I noticed that you have reverted to restore your preferred version of :Marko Miljanov ↗ several times. The impulse to undo an edit you disagree with is understandable, but I wanted to make sure you're aware that the edit warring policy ↗ disallows repeated reversions even if they are justifiable.

All editors are expected to discuss content disputes on article talk pages ↗ to try to reach consensus ↗. If you are unable to agree&#32;at {{TALKPAGENAME:Marko Miljanov}} ↗, please use one of the dispute resolution options ↗ to seek input from others. Using this approach instead of reverting can help you avoid getting drawn into an edit war. Thank you.<!-- Template:uw-ewsoft --> '''<span style="color:#008B8B;">Vanjagenije</span> <span style="color: #F4A460;">(talk)</span>''' 15:34, 17 February 2025 (UTC)

:Can you explain to me why you deleted the fact that Marko Miljanov was a Serb who happened to live in Montenegro? The video I posted as proof of my claim proves unequivocally that the Kuči collectively as a tribe feel like Serbs. For them, "Montenegrian" is not a national affiliation but a regional one. According to the Kuči tribe, Montenegrins are Serbs like Venetians are Italians. Whatismyname2000 (talk) 15:42, 17 February 2025 (UTC)
::First of all, you are confusing ethnicity ↗ with nationality ↗. English word "nationality" has a different meaning than the Serbo-Croatian word "nacionalnost". I do not dispute that Miljanov was ethnically Serb, that is clear. But, the WP:lead section ↗ and the WP:infobox ↗ should contain nationality, not ethnicity, see WP:ETHNICITY ↗ for more info. '''<span style="color:#008B8B;">Vanjagenije</span> <span style="color: #F4A460;">(talk)</span>''' 15:47, 17 February 2025 (UTC)
:::I don't understand. What you are talking about is citizenship. Not nationality. Marko Miljanov's nationality is Serbian and he is an ethnic Serb. His citizenship is Montenegrin because he lives in Montenegro. Should the part of the page you are talking about include nationality or citizenship? In the first case, it should be written that Marko Miljanov is a Serbian. In the second case, a Montenegrian. Whatismyname2000 (talk) 15:57, 17 February 2025 (UTC)
::::Did you even bother to read the nationality ↗ article, or are you just giving your opinion on what "nationality" should mean? '''<span style="color:#008B8B;">Vanjagenije</span> <span style="color: #F4A460;">(talk)</span>''' 21:02, 17 February 2025 (UTC)
:::::Моје мишљење? Националност подразумева припадност нацији. Држављанство припадност држави. То је мишљење? Националност човека чију страницу узалудно мењам је Србин. Држављанство је црногорско. Whatismyname2000 (talk) 21:24, 17 February 2025 (UTC)
:::::Нема одговора? Whatismyname2000 (talk) 06:53, 18 February 2025 (UTC)

March 2025



30px|link= ↗ You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war ↗&#32; according to the reverts you have made on :Grandmaster (chess) ↗. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate ↗ with others, to avoid editing disruptively ↗, and to try to reach a consensus ↗, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:
# '''Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;'''
# '''Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.'''
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page ↗ to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard ↗ or seek dispute resolution ↗. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection ↗. If you engage in an edit war, you '''may be blocked ↗ from editing.''' <!-- Template:uw-ew --> <span style="border-radius:2px;padding:3px;background:#1E816F"><span style="color:#fff">'''Remsense'''</span><span style="color:#fff">&nbsp;‥&nbsp;</span><span lang="zh" style="color:#fff">'''论'''</span></span> 06:29, 11 March 2025 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 20



Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Hungarian Chess Championship ↗, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Csaba Horváth ↗. Such links are usually incorrect ↗, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. <small>(Read the FAQ{{*}} Join us at the DPL WikiProject ↗.)</small>

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 19:57, 20 March 2025 (UTC)

Referred to WP:ANI ↗ for violating WP:3RR ↗ at Grandmaster (chess) ↗



link=|25px|alt=Information icon ↗ There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents ↗ regarding an issue with which you may have been involved.<!--Template:Discussion notice--><!--Template:ANI-notice--> Quale (talk) 17:15, 11 April 2025 (UTC)

April 2025


<div class="user-block uw-pblock" style="padding: 5px; margin-bottom: 0.5em; border: 1px solid #a9a9a9; background-color: #ffefd5; min-height: 40px">40px|left|alt=Stop icon with clock ↗<div style="margin-left:45px">You have been '''blocked ↗''' from editing from certain pages (:Grandmaster (chess) ↗) for a period of '''1 month''' for edit warring ↗. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions ↗. </div><div style="margin-left:45px">During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes ↗ and seek consensus ↗. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution ↗, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection ↗.</div><div style="margin-left:45px">If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks ↗, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. Do not include the "tlx|" code. --><code><nowiki>{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}</nowiki></code>. &nbsp;ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 17:17, 11 April 2025 (UTC)</div></div><!-- Template:uw-ewpblock -->

Copyright problem: Svetozar Gligorić


30px|link=|alt=Control copyright icon ↗ Hello Whatismyname2000! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Svetozar Gligorić ↗, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted material from other websites or printed works. This article appears to contain work copied from https://www.chessgames.com/player/svetozar_gligoric.html, and therefore to constitute a violation of Wikipedia's copyright policies ↗. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted. While we appreciate your contributions, copying content from other websites is unlawful and against Wikipedia's copyright policy ↗. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators are likely to lose their editing privileges ↗.

If you believe that the article is ''not'' a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under license allowed by Wikipedia, then you should do one of the following:

It may also be necessary for the text to be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and to follow Wikipedia article layout ↗. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines ↗.

See Wikipedia:Declaration of consent for all enquiries ↗ for a template of the permissions letter the copyright holder is expected to send.

Otherwise, you may rewrite this article from scratch. If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at [{{fullurl:Talk:Svetozar Gligorić/Temp|action=edit&preload=Template:Copyvio/preload}} this temporary page]. Leave a note at Talk:Svetozar Gligorić ↗ saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved.

Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing!<!-- Template:Nothanks-web --> — Diannaa&nbsp;<span style="color:red">🍁</span>&nbsp;(talk) 18:34, 11 April 2025 (UTC)

:How long does it take to read a few paragraphs? What are you doing all this time? Whatismyname2000 (talk) 08:04, 12 April 2025 (UTC)
::Perhaps you do not realize that I live in Canada? It is now 6:52 AM in my time zone. So what have I been doing? Since I posted my last message, I went to the gym, had supper, watched the hockey game, and went to bed.{{pb}}I have now checked your amendments to the article and it's not ready yet so I have restored the copyvio template. You can use Earwig's tool ↗ to detect what remains to be done. Thanks. — Diannaa&nbsp;<span style="color:red">🍁</span>&nbsp;(talk) 13:05, 12 April 2025 (UTC)
:::Sorry. No hard feelings. I thought you were European. Didn't pay attention to the maple leaf😅. Whatismyname2000 (talk) 13:17, 12 April 2025 (UTC)
::::Please let me know when it's ready for another check. I will be doing some real-life tasks today so please be patient if I don't show up here in a timely fashion! {{smiley|3}} Cheers, — Diannaa&nbsp;<span style="color:red">🍁</span>&nbsp;(talk) 15:17, 12 April 2025 (UTC)
:::::I think I'm done. If something else needs to be changed, just tell me to what percentage I have to lower the matching of the two texts. And I wouldn't even mention anything if I knew how many time zones separate us. Whenever you find time to check this I'm fine with that. Greetings🙂 Whatismyname2000 (talk) 15:52, 12 April 2025 (UTC)
::::::I don't actually go by percentrages, but I look at individual phrases and see what improvements need to be made. The current version is okay. Thanks for taking the time to get this fixed. — Diannaa&nbsp;<span style="color:red">🍁</span>&nbsp;(talk) 20:06, 12 April 2025 (UTC)
:::::::👍 Whatismyname2000 (talk) 20:17, 12 April 2025 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 17



An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Svetozar Gligorić ↗, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Robert Wade ↗, Vladimir Sokolov ↗ and Larry Evans ↗.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:56, 17 April 2025 (UTC)

Battle of Gallipoli (1312) ↗



Novak Grebostrek wasn't at this battle, Oikonomides, Nicolas, page 166, "AFTER Halil Edje and his men were annihilated, a second Serbian elite cavalry contingent arrive in Herakleia, under the command of the nobleman Novak Grebostrek." --Kansas Bear (talk) 20:33, 28 May 2025 (UTC)

:My mistake. Whatismyname2000 (talk) 21:39, 28 May 2025 (UTC)

June 2025



30px|link=|alt=Copyright problem icon ↗ Your edit to :Dragomir Krančević ↗ has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted ↗ material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission ↗ from the copyright holder. If you {{em|are}} the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials ↗ for information on how to contribute your work appropriately. For legal reasons, Wikipedia strictly cannot host copyrighted text or images from print media or digital platforms without an appropriate ↗ and verifiable license. Contributions infringing on copyright will be removed. You may use external websites or publications as a source of {{em|information}}, but not as a source of {{em|content}}, such as sentences or images&mdash;you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy '''will be blocked from editing ↗'''. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources ↗ for more information. <!-- Template:uw-copyright --> — Diannaa&nbsp;<span style="color:red">🍁</span>&nbsp;(talk) 13:35, 11 June 2025 (UTC)

June 2025


25px|alt=Information icon ↗ Please do not remove maintenance templates ↗ from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to :Stevan Hristić ↗, without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary ↗. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted ↗. Thank you.<!-- Template:uw-tdel2 --> Dl2000 (talk) 19:56, 12 June 2025 (UTC)

Identity card



Hello Whatismyname2000. Even if the picture of the identity card was valid as a source, you also need to keep in mind that only a notable nationality of the subject is mentioned in the lead per MOS:NATIONALITY ↗. I do not see what is unclear about Wikipedia relying only on reliable and published sources, particularly secondary sources. StephenMacky1 (talk) 15:10, 13 June 2025 (UTC)

:I don't understand. The picture is absolutely authentic. Taken from this site.
:https://www.ivoandric.org.rs/%D0%B1%D0%B8%D0%BE%D0%B3%D1%80%D0%B0%D1%84%D0%B8%D1%98%D0%B0
:The man clearly declared himself as Serbian, just as his contemporary Miroslav Krleza declared himself a Croatian. If Miroslav Krleža's page says "Croatian", by what logic does Andrić's page not say "Serbian"? Whatismyname2000 (talk) 17:49, 13 June 2025 (UTC)
::It is not about whether the document is authentic or not. It is about how the subject is commonly defined in sources. You cannot use one document to disregard secondary sources and switch nationality unilaterally. I am not interested in whataboutism. If you have issues with Krleža's page, you can raise it on the article's talk page. I would advise you to discuss this issue regarding Andrić on the main article's talk page. You will need more than a picture of an identity card to change nationality though. Nationality is also not the same thing as ethnicity. StephenMacky1 (talk) 17:59, 13 June 2025 (UTC)
:::Hahaha... You've got to be kidding. That's like saying you need more than my identity card to figure out my name. For God's sake we are talking about identity card. Whatismyname2000 (talk) 18:34, 13 June 2025 (UTC)
::::Did you miss everything I wrote to you? I pointed you to a guideline as well. You ignored it. If we went solely by documents, then even Nikola Tesla would not be defined as a Serbian-American in his article. If you are not gonna bother reading basic messages (and guidelines), then I will not waste my time with you. You also need to learn to distinguish between "nationality" and "ethnicity". Sounds like you have not learned the difference since February 2025. StephenMacky1 (talk) 20:48, 13 June 2025 (UTC)
:::::It's my fault. When it comes to nationality, personally, the most important thing for me is how someone defines himself. If you were to tell me that you are French, I absolutely do not care what passport or passports you have. During their lives, Andrić and Tesla clearly expressed their position on the issue of national affiliation many times. But it doesn't seem to mean anything to you. Even documents have significance on a case-by-case basis. There is no criterion by which Andrić is not a Serb and Krleža is a Croat.
:::::But I won't bother you anymore. I understand how double standards work. Whatismyname2000 (talk) 21:41, 13 June 2025 (UTC)
::::::There are no double standards. We define people as per secondary sources, and not personal or state documents. What I meant is that there is no document where Tesla is defined as a "Serbian-American". If there are secondary sources that deem a nationality as a notable aspect of a person, then that's what gets covered in the first sentence. A case could be made that Andrić being a Serbian is notable enough to mention in the first sentence as well, but I disagree with excluding Yugoslav, since that is clearly a notable aspect and sources that classify him as such can easily be found. However, if you claim that him being "Serbian" is also notable for the first sentence, then you will have no issue citing several sources that emphasize that. StephenMacky1 (talk) 21:52, 13 June 2025 (UTC)

July 2025


{{checkuserblock-account|sig=&#126; ToBeFree (talk) 13:16, 28 July 2025 (UTC)}}

:Why did you block me? Whatismyname2000 (talk) 14:08, 28 July 2025 (UTC)
:The links that I posted during the discussions on FIBA basketball World Cup page, the links that you can find on the FIBA website, prove that after the independence of Montenegro, Serbia retained the place of FR Yugoslavia/Serbia and Montenegro as a FIBA member. This means that the medals won between 1992 and 2006 belong to Serbia, which is fair. 95% of the players of FR Yugoslavia/Serbia and Montenegro were Serbs anyway. If the official FIBA decision says one thing and the medal table of the same organization says something else, why am I blocked!? I can also find you a video that FIBA posted 2 years ago, in which the position was taken without hesitation that FR Yugoslavia's medals belong to Serbia. WHY DID YOU BLOCK ME? Whatismyname2000 (talk) 14:18, 28 July 2025 (UTC)
::I'll send you an e-mail. You can decide if you'd like to share it by copying it here for discussion. &#126; ToBeFree (talk) 14:23, 28 July 2025 (UTC)
:::E-mail sent. Feel free to copy it here. &#126; ToBeFree (talk) 14:25, 28 July 2025 (UTC)
::::I don't understand. I explained to you what was discussed during the debate on FIBA World Cup page. You blocked me with an explaination that:
::::"Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse".
::::Why did you block me? Whatismyname2000 (talk) 14:37, 28 July 2025 (UTC)
::::Hello Whatismyname2000,
::::you may copy this text to your user talk page if it's not a secret to you. By doing so, you irrevocably publish the connection between your account and the IP address.
::::You have edit warred using your account Whatismyname2000 and your IP address 178.221.182.70 while logged out, and you did so after the page was protected because of your earlier edit warring, and you did so after a month-long block for edit warring, so you knew this behavior is prohibited.
::::Best regards,
::::ToBeFree Whatismyname2000 (talk) 14:43, 28 July 2025 (UTC)
:::::Thank you. Does the e-mail leave any questions open about the block reason? &#126; ToBeFree (talk) 14:46, 28 July 2025 (UTC)
::::::Are you kidding me? Of course.
::::::The reason I was previously blocked from editing for a month has nothing to do with this. I insisted that the page about chess grandmasters should have a table with the name and flags of the original grandmasters. The man who blocked me took the view that it was unnecessary. This time the situation is completely different. One user ie. I present a source that comes from FIBA which proves that Serbia retained the place of FR Yugoslavia as a FIBA member and that on that basis the medals of FR Yugoslavia belong to Serbia. Another user cites a source from the same organization that contradicts what FIBA claims. If FIBA doesn't agree with itself, why am I blocked? And why is my interlocutor right and I am not? Whatismyname2000 (talk) 14:56, 28 July 2025 (UTC)
::::::https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dnkoQgKeUPk Whatismyname2000 (talk) 15:43, 28 July 2025 (UTC)
::::::I mean Jesus Christ... Look at this! I want an explanation. Why did you block me? Whatismyname2000 (talk) 15:44, 28 July 2025 (UTC)
:::::::I think there may be a significant misunderstanding here that, if it's the only one and if that's cleared up, may lead to:
:::::::* you understanding why you were blocked, and
:::::::* you promising that you won't do it again, and
:::::::* you getting unblocked because the block lacks a preventative need from that point on.
:::::::And that misunderstanding may be pretty simple, actually. If I understand correctly, you genuinely believe that both your original block and this one have anything to do with the accuracy of your content.
:::::::They don't.
:::::::Edit warring ↗ is disruptive and prohibited '''even if you are right'''. &#126; ToBeFree (talk) 16:06, 28 July 2025 (UTC)
::::::::As soon as you see the issue, please create an unblock request using the instructions at WP:GAB ↗, and make sure that your request explains what the issue was, why it didn't become clear even when you were blocked explicitly for this reason (see the 1-month block message from back then, please, have a close look at what it says) and why we can be sure that it won't happen again. &#126; ToBeFree (talk) 16:08, 28 July 2025 (UTC)

{{unblock reviewed|1=While editing pages on Wikipedia, I was under the impression that it is possible to get a block if you insist too much on changing the page in accordance with claims of a subjective nature when there's really no source I could use to back up the claim. To be honest, I didn't read the warnings i got before. Probably because of that I honestly had no idea that it was possible to get blocked even if I provided first-class evidence for what I was claiming. And that's exactly what happened when I edited the FIBA World Cup page while providing evidences that medals of FR Yugoslavia belong to Serbia (https://www.fiba.basketball/en/news/pr-no-22-montenegro-becomes-213th-fiba-member .... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dnkoQgKeUPk). If I understood correctly based on the discussions with ToBeFree who blocked me, the war between editors is prohibited in itself and can lead to the fact that even the editor who is right and provides evidence for his claim is blocked. I honestly didn't know that this was possible at all. I believed that in the case of presenting first-class evidence, it is impossible to get a block no matter how many times I change the content of the page in accordance with what the source says. Obviously I was wrong. In this regard, I am sending a request for unblock with the promise that the edit war will not happen again in my case|accept=Thank you and welcome back. Feel free to remove all of this. &#126; ToBeFree (talk) 01:13, 29 July 2025 (UTC)}} Whatismyname2000 (talk) 20:14, 28 July 2025 (UTC)

:In case you encounter a similar situation again, what would you do? The policy against edit warring ↗ contains advice for such situations. The dispute resolution policy ↗ goes even further with advice. &#126; ToBeFree (talk) 20:37, 28 July 2025 (UTC)
::I'll be reading this in the next few days for sure, but I can guarantee you that I am absolutely no longer interested in insisting on changing any page even if I provide proof for my claim. I will try to change the page according to what my proof says. I'll try once. If someone restores the old version of the page, the discussion is over as far as I'm concerned. I don't care anymore. I won't risk the block. If the links you sent me give me some better advice on what to do if someone keeps bringing back the old version of the page despite the evidence I've presented then I'll apply that advice. Whatismyname2000 (talk) 20:55, 28 July 2025 (UTC)
::When I say "page" I mean any page. Whatismyname2000 (talk) 20:56, 28 July 2025 (UTC)
:::Thank you and welcome back. Feel free to remove all of this. &#126; ToBeFree (talk) 01:13, 29 July 2025 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 14



An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Boris Kostić ↗, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Frank Marshall ↗.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:57, 14 September 2025 (UTC)

ArbCom 2025 Elections voter message



<div class="ivmbox " style="margin-bottom: 1em; border: 1px solid #a2a9b1; background-color: #fdf2d5; padding: 0.5em; display: flex; align-items: center; ">
<div class="ivmbox-image" style="padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em;flex-basis: 40px">40px ↗</div>
<div class="ivmbox-text">
Hello! Voting in the '''2025 Arbitration Committee elections ↗''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2025|end}}-1 day}}. All '''eligible users ↗''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee ↗ is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process ↗. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans ↗, topic bans ↗, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy ↗ describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please review the candidates ↗ and submit your choices on the '''2025|poll}}|voting page ↗'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. <small>MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:51, 18 November 2025 (UTC)</small>

</div>
</div>
<!-- Message sent by User:Cyberpower678@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2025/Coordination/MM/09&oldid=1322758983 -->

Battle of Kosovo 1389



The Turks came to Serbia with the intention of occupying the country, establishing Turkish administration and potentially continuing their march further towards Europe. After the battle, the Turks did not achieve any of these goals and withdrew from Serbia. What is this but a Serbian victory? Whatismyname2000 (talk) 07:19, 17 January 2026 (UTC)

Serbia men's national water polo team



Could you explain why you removed almost all newly added information from the Serbia national water polo team page, including the first matches, players, and participants? '''S.W.''' <!-- Template:Unsigned IP --><small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding unsigned ↗ comment added by ~2026-55949-4 ↗ (talk) 23:26, 26 January 2026 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

Hello



Try not to add too many images, please. ''Less is more''. Best. — <span style="color:#CC6600;">Sadko</span> (words are wind) 00:43, 12 February 2026 (UTC)

Copying licensed material requires attribution



25px|alt=Information icon ↗ Thank you for your contributions ↗ to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved content from :Serbs ↗ into :Culture of Serbia ↗. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content (here or elsewhere), Wikipedia's licensing ↗ requires that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s).{{pb}} When copying within Wikipedia, at a minimum, give attribution in an edit summary ↗ at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking ↗ to the copied page, e.g., <code>copied content from <nowiki>page name ↗</nowiki>; see that page's history for attribution</code>. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{tl|copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination.{{pb}} Please add attribution if no one has done so yet. If you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia ↗. Thank you. <!-- Template:uw-copying -->— Diannaa&nbsp;<span style="color:red">🍁</span>&nbsp;(talk) 15:11, 12 February 2026 (UTC)

June 2026 ethnicity in the lead



I just reverted a weird edit at Ivo Vojnović ↗. I see you've been battling similar issues since last summer. This sort of behavior is a glaring WP:ARBMAC ↗ violation. Any further violations will lead to a block. --Joy (talk) 20:37, 20 June 2026 (UTC)

:I don't understand. I have never edited Ivo Vojnovic's page in my life... And what did I even do now? I made a claim and posted a source that proves that claim? Isn't that what editing is all about? What is weird about it? Whatismyname2000 (talk) 22:16, 20 June 2026 (UTC)