User Talk: Whothatwhothatwhothstboi

Server-side rendered snapshot of this editor's Wikipedia talk page discussions.

August 2023

25px|alt=Information icon ↗ Hello, I'm Estar8806. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, it's important to be mindful of the feelings of your fellow editors, who may be frustrated by certain types of interaction, such as your addition to :User talk:Priya 43434 ↗. While you probably didn't intend any offense, please do remember that Wikipedia strives to be an inclusive atmosphere. In light of that, it would be greatly appreciated if you could moderate yourself so as not to offend. ''Profane language should be avoided at all costs while communicating with other editors. Thanks,'' estar8806 (talk) ★ ↗ 15:09, 26 August 2023 (UTC)

:Hey sorry. I was just so upset. Priya keeps changing the accurate edits to wrong things. It has been pissing me off. If she stops doing that, I wouldn't have to be so harsh. Whothatwhothatwhothstboi (talk) 23:13, 26 August 2023 (UTC)
::Wrong answer. You can be civil ↗. You're getting upset about a TV show. --Onorem (talk) 05:13, 27 August 2023 (UTC)
:::Not about the show. The audacity to keep changing the wikipedia page. I worked hard to keep it updated and accurate, but she keeps changing it to innacurate material. Whothatwhothatwhothstboi (talk) 06:50, 27 August 2023 (UTC)

June 2024

25px|alt=Information icon ↗ Hi Whothatwhothatwhothstboi! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor at :Udaariyaan ↗ that may not have been. "Minor edit ↗" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia—it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections ↗ or reverting obvious vandalism ↗. Any edit that changes the <em>meaning</em> of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Thank you.  '''<span style="color: darkred;">Ravensfire</span>''' (talk) 04:33, 20 June 2024 (UTC)

July 2024

25px|alt=Information icon ↗ Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at :Udaariyaan ↗. Your edits appear to be disruptive ↗ and have been or will be reverted ↗.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute ↗ with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page ↗, and seek consensus ↗ with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution ↗ page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards ↗.

If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents ↗.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines ↗, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges ↗. ''I'm not the first user to revert your unnecessary, unexplained, unverified, and excessively detailed edits in this article. You want to update some number? Do it--but not while adding loads of redundant detail please.'' Drmies (talk) 14:07, 6 July 2024 (UTC)

25px|alt=Information icon|link= ↗ Hello. I have noticed that you {{usertalk other|often ↗|often}} edit without using an edit summary ↗. Please do your best to '''always fill in the summary field'''. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. To help yourself remember, you may wish to check the "prompt me when entering a blank edit summary" box in your preferences ↗. Thanks!  Drmies (talk) 14:08, 6 July 2024 (UTC)

:Oh of course! Sorry about that. Whothatwhothatwhothstboi (talk) 06:11, 7 July 2024 (UTC)

Nomination of :Pukaar – Dil Se Dil Tak ↗ for deletion

<div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">48px|alt=|link= ↗</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article :Pukaar – Dil Se Dil Tak ↗, to which you have significantly contributed ↗, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines ↗ or if it should be deleted ↗.

The discussion will take place at '''Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pukaar – Dil Se Dil Tak ↗''' until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by ''SDZeroBot'' (talk) 01:01, 16 July 2024 (UTC)

August 2024

25px|alt=Information icon ↗ Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions ↗ did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted ↗. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines ↗. You can find information about these at our welcome page ↗ which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia ↗. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page ↗. ''I would not advise restoring ↗ this WP:FANCRUFT ↗ again without consensus. See WP:ONUS ↗.'' CNMall41 (talk) 08:02, 5 August 2024 (UTC)

:Sorry I am not really familiar with Wiki rules. I am just here to make sure the plot and the cast are accurate with ITV show articles. Whothatwhothatwhothstboi (talk) 05:46, 6 August 2024 (UTC)

25px|alt=Information icon ↗ Hello, I'm CNMall41. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions ↗ to :Anurager Chhowa ↗ have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse ↗ or the Help desk ↗. Thanks. CNMall41 (talk) 22:12, 25 August 2024 (UTC)

:Dude, no one likes your changes. Why are you hellbent on changing things when it has always been done this way?? It’s infuriating. People come to Wikipedia to learn the plot and see if it’s worth watching or not. The cast list is there to understand how characters are related to one another. Whothatwhothatwhothstboi (talk) 02:56, 26 August 2024 (UTC)

CIVILITY

Please review WP:CIVIL ↗ compared to your edit summary ↗. Should you decide to be uncivil or revert again, it will be brought up at WP:ANI ↗. If you feel this fancruft should be included in the article, it is up to you per WP:ONUS ↗ to get consensus. CNMall41 (talk) 22:13, 25 August 2024 (UTC)

:Sure bud. Let’s see if people like you messing with all their hard work and deleting it within seconds. Whothatwhothatwhothstboi (talk) 02:58, 26 August 2024 (UTC)
::Unfortunately, WP:FANCRUFT ↗ is not allowed. This is an encyclopedia, not IMDb or WP:NOTTVGUIDE ↗. Has nothing to do with me. --CNMall41 (talk) 03:45, 26 August 2024 (UTC)

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

<div class="ivmbox " style="margin-bottom: 1em; border: 1px solid #a2a9b1; background-color: #fdf2d5; padding: 0.5em; display: flex; align-items: center; ">
<div class="ivmbox-image noresize" style="padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em;">40px ↗</div>
<div class="ivmbox-text">
Hello! Voting in the '''2024 Arbitration Committee elections ↗''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2024|end}}-1 day}}. All '''eligible users ↗''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee ↗ is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process ↗. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans ↗, topic bans ↗, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy ↗ describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates ↗ and submit your choices on the '''2024|poll}}|voting page ↗'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. <small>MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:53, 19 November 2024 (UTC)</small>

</div>
</div>

January 2025

25px|alt=Information icon ↗ Hello, I'm CNMall41. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, :Karuthamuthu ↗, but you didn't provide a reliable source ↗. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation ↗ and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners ↗. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you.  CNMall41 (talk) 02:01, 12 January 2025 (UTC)

Final Warning

You were already warned multiple times about adding information in violation of WP:TVCAST ↗. You continue to do it ↗. Consider this your last warning before being reported. CNMall41 (talk) 20:11, 6 February 2025 (UTC)

:You are the one that comes to each ITV wiki and ruins it. I don’t get why you are hellbent on getting rid of stuff that is helpful. Whothatwhothatwhothstboi (talk) 02:02, 7 February 2025 (UTC)

ArbCom 2025 Elections voter message

<div class="ivmbox " style="margin-bottom: 1em; border: 1px solid #a2a9b1; background-color: #fdf2d5; padding: 0.5em; display: flex; align-items: center; ">
<div class="ivmbox-image" style="padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em;flex-basis: 40px">40px ↗</div>
<div class="ivmbox-text">
Hello! Voting in the '''2025 Arbitration Committee elections ↗''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2025|end}}-1 day}}. All '''eligible users ↗''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee ↗ is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process ↗. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans ↗, topic bans ↗, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy ↗ describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please review the candidates ↗ and submit your choices on the '''2025|poll}}|voting page ↗'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. <small>MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:58, 18 November 2025 (UTC)</small>

</div>
</div>