User Talk: Yivan000

Server-side rendered snapshot of this editor's Wikipedia talk page discussions.

----
<blockquote style="text-align:center">
''Talk. Talk page.''

''It was said that I needed to write a talk page. And here I am writing a talk page.''

''Nobody said that. They didn't talk.''

''You are reading this, not talking it.''

''- Yivan''
</blockquote>
----

Speedy deletion nomination of Don Bosco Parish

Hello Yivan000,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Don Bosco Parish ↗ for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly indicate why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can '''[//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title={{urlencode:Talk:Don Bosco Parish}}&action=edit&section=new&preload=Template:Hangon_preload&preloadtitle=This+page+should+not+be+speedy+deleted+because...+ contest this deletion]''', but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page ↗ if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation ↗ tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Red Phoenix talk 02:39, 10 July 2019 (UTC)

: Oh, I didn't know this was a thing. Not that I look at this, it seems like WP:A7 ↗ has reasons that are currently present with the subject (the fact that Don Bosco Parish was marked "not important or significant" makes me laugh as it is slightly true now that I think of it). I was thinking about it also being an educational institution (which they are), but then again I can't find any more sources for this let alone their schools. So, I will give the go signal to delete that article. 
: So unless the educational institution reason holds up, go ahead. Delete the article. :) Yivan000 (talk) 03:35, 10 July 2019 (UTC)
::Hi Yivan000. I appreciate how polite you have been, and I did notice the effort you have put in to try and make this work. Unfortunately, Wikipedia is pretty specific on what is and isn't notable ↗ enough to have an article. If you ever have any questions and have an idea for another article, you can always use articles for creation ↗, as they're pretty helpful. I'm always willing to answer any questions you have. Best of luck! Red Phoenix talk 11:50, 10 July 2019 (UTC)

Migration to minecraft.wiki

Hi. I thought you might want to change the Fandom Minecraft Wiki link on your user page to the new location on minecraft.wiki - I see you've already redirected your user page on Fandom. ~Anachronist (talk) 06:02, 17 October 2023 (UTC)
: Looks like I forgot to update my Wikipedia userpage. Done! — 🍕 Yivan000 viewtalk ↗ 07:12, 17 October 2023 (UTC)
::Great, thanks. I'm an admin in both places, there and here. The job is a lot easier there than here! ~Anachronist (talk) 03:07, 18 October 2023 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 5

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Pantabangan ↗, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ilocano ↗. Such links are usually incorrect ↗, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ{{*}} Join us at the DPL WikiProject ↗.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 08:00, 5 January 2025 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 21

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of Filipino restaurants ↗, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Urdaneta ↗.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:56, 21 March 2025 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi Yivan000. Thank you for your work on 2025 Philippine earthquakes ↗. Another editor, MPGuy2824, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol ↗ and left the following comment:

{{Bq|1=either there should be a link to an article about the earthquake, OR there should be a reference if no article exists}}

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{code|<nowiki>{{Re|</nowiki>MPGuy2824<nowiki>}}</nowiki>}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation ↗ tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

-MPGuy2824 (talk) 04:45, 12 October 2025 (UTC)

:@MPGuy2824 2 of them are already linked to their respective articles, while the rest are just listed as such since there are no specific articles about them (as of now). — 🍕 Yivan000 viewtalk ↗ 05:00, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
::{{tq|the rest are just listed as such since there are no specific articles about them}} which is why I think you should add references for those. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 05:01, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
:::Done. — 🍕 Yivan000 viewtalk ↗ 05:29, 12 October 2025 (UTC)

Links to draft articles

25px|alt=Information icon ↗ Please do not introduce links ↗ to draft ↗ articles in actual articles, as you did to :2025 Philippine protests ↗. Since a draft is not yet ready for the main article space, it is not in shape for ordinary readers, and links from articles should not go to a draft. Such links are contrary to the Manual of Style ↗. {{#ifeq:{{lc:}}|yes|An edit has converted these links, into links to the not-currently-existing page (redlinks) where the draft will be placed if it is eventually accepted. Thus the links will automatically become valid links aimed at the correct target when and if the draft is accepted.|These links have been removed.}} Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 16:09, 17 November 2025 (UTC)

ArbCom 2025 Elections voter message

<div class="ivmbox " style="margin-bottom: 1em; border: 1px solid #a2a9b1; background-color: #fdf2d5; padding: 0.5em; display: flex; align-items: center; ">
<div class="ivmbox-image" style="padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em;flex-basis: 40px">40px ↗</div>
<div class="ivmbox-text">
Hello! Voting in the '''2025 Arbitration Committee elections ↗''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2025|end}}-1 day}}. All '''eligible users ↗''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee ↗ is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process ↗. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans ↗, topic bans ↗, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy ↗ describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please review the candidates ↗ and submit your choices on the '''2025|poll}}|voting page ↗'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:42, 18 November 2025 (UTC)

</div>
</div>