User Talk: Aciram

Server-side rendered snapshot of this editor's Wikipedia talk page discussions.

thumb|250px|'''Agnolo Bronzino ↗''' – ”Portrait of Lucrezia Panciatichi” (circa 1540). [[Galleria degli Uffizi ↗, Florence ↗.]]
thumb|left|The Goddess Demeter ↗. ↗
{{Archive basics
|archive = User talk:Aciram/Archives/%(counter)d/%(monthname)s
|counter = 2015
}}
{{User:ClueBot III/ArchiveThis
|archiveprefix=User talk:Aciram/Archives/
|format=Y/F
|age=2160
}}
{{bots|deny=DPL bot}}
{{Archive box |search=yes |collapsible=yes |collapsed=yes |minkeepthreads=2 |
bot=ClueBot III |age=90 |
title=Archives ↗ (1}}/Archive index|index ↗)|
{{Nowrap|'''2007''': {{Archives by months|2007}}}}
{{Nowrap|'''2008''': {{Archives by months|2008}}}}
{{Nowrap|'''2009''': {{Archives by months|2009}}}}
{{Nowrap|'''2010''': {{Archives by months|2010}}}}
{{Nowrap|'''2011''': {{Archives by months|2011}}}}
{{Nowrap|'''2012''': {{Archives by months|2012}}}}
{{Nowrap|'''2013''': {{Archives by months|2013}}}}
{{Nowrap|'''2014''': {{Archives by months|2014}}}}
{{Nowrap|'''2015''': {{Archives by months|2015}}}}
}}

CfD nomination at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2026 May 10 § "Somalian" to "Somali" across the board ↗

<div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">48px|alt=|link= ↗</div>Categories you have created have been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization ↗ guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at '''Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2026 May 10 § "Somalian" to "Somali" across the board ↗''' on the categories for discussion ↗ page. Thank you. '''~Malvoliox''' ''(talk | contribs ↗)'' 17:31, 10 May 2026 (UTC)

May 2026

25px|alt=Information icon ↗ Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. A page you recently created, :François Galaup de Chasteuil ↗, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines ↗ for new pages, so it has been moved to where you can continue to work on it. Please consider using the Article Wizard ↗ or the Articles for Creation ↗ procedure. For more information about creating articles, you may want to read "Your first article ↗". You may also want to read our introduction page ↗ to learn more about contributing. Thank you.  -- HungryHighway🛣️ 08:41, 18 May 2026 (UTC)
:Wikipedia has the following policy: an article is never complete. It is open for every user to edit, and improve, as log as it excists. That is a constructve policy. It means that millions of people can conctribute to it, and correct any faults it might have.
:To move an article do draft space, however, is an inefficent policy. That means, that the correction of flaws in the article is left for one single person to correct, if they should have the time, or wish, to do so. That is inconstructive and inefficient.
:In this case, it means that ths article will remain in draft space until it is deleted. It is a shame, since it is evidently relevant in its context - a famed criminal of one of the biggest crime cases of a century - but I have neither time or energy to make it perfect. Such a shame that the article is not open to more people to edit, than a single one. If it had, it could have been saved. Have a nice day. --Aciram (talk) 11:14, 18 May 2026 (UTC)

Maître Pierre (poisoner) ↗ moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Maître Pierre (poisoner) ↗. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing as a live article at this time because '''it needs more sources to establish notability'''.
I have converted it to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page ↗.
When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. -- HungryHighway🛣️ 21:28, 18 May 2026 (UTC)

:Wikipedia has the following policy: an article is never complete. It is open for every user to edit, and improve, as log as it excists. That is a constructve policy. It means that millions of people can conctribute to it, and correct any faults it might have.
:To move an article do draft space, however, is an inefficent policy. That means, that the correction of flaws in the article is left for one single person to correct, if they should have the time, or wish, to do so. That is inconstructive and inefficient.
:In this case, it means that ths article will remain in draft space until it is deleted. It is a shame, since it is evidently relevant in its context - a famed criminal of one of the biggest crime cases of a century - but I have neither time or energy to make it perfect. Such a shame that the article is not open to more people to edit, than a single one. If it had, it could have been saved. Have a nice day. --Aciram (talk) 00:47, 19 May 2026 (UTC)

Wikiproject Feminism Revive

Hello User:Aciram, I wanted to notify you that there are a few editors, including myself, trying to REVIVE ↗ Wikiproject feminism ↗. We recently sorted through the old members' list and found that you were still active! If you want to help Revive Wikiproject feminism ↗ we'd love to have you! Also if you have anyone in mind who you think would be willing to join the project please leave them an invitation on their Talk page ↗ [[User:The Ars Goetia|Goetia [She/They] ]] (talk) 16:13, 24 May 2026 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi Aciram. Thank you for your work on Jacqueline du Roure, vicomtesse de Polignac ↗. Another editor, Bogger, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol ↗ and left the following comment:

{{Bq|1=Remember to include the Template:translated page ↗ template for translated articles on the talk page. -}}

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{code|<nowiki>{{Re|</nowiki>Bogger<nowiki>}}</nowiki>}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation ↗ tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Bogger (talk) 12:29, 25 May 2026 (UTC)

Speedy deletion ↗ nomination of :Category:Vietnamese slaves ↗

48px|left|alt=|link= ↗

A tag has been placed on :Category:Vietnamese slaves ↗ indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category ↗, a category redirect ↗, under discussion at Categories for discussion ↗, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion ↗.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may '''contest the nomination''' by visiting the page ↗ and removing the speedy deletion tag.   '''''L'''''iz '''''Read!''''' ↗ '''''Talk!''''' 22:04, 7 June 2026 (UTC)

Formatting of your references in recent new articles

Hey there Aciram. You (and I) have been around since 2007, so I know you know how to (a) format reused references and (b) how to include the URL (when it's available) in the reference (for verifiability ↗), so I'm wondering why your recent new articles (I came across them during new page patrol ↗) have reference sections that look like they're ai-generated. To be clear, I'm not stating that they ''are'' ai-generated, only that they ''look like'' they are. Three examples (but there are others, which is why I'm inquiring):

Caesia Helpis ↗, uses the same 2 references as Vibia (vine merchant) ↗ (I added the URLs to the latter).

Melissonomoi ↗ uses the same ref 3 times (I handled the reuse function; and added an additional ref).

-- Rosiestep (talk) 14:50, 8 June 2026 (UTC)

Speedy deletion ↗ nomination of :Alia Hafeez ↗

48px|left|alt=|link= ↗
{{Quote box|quote=If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article ↗.You may want to consider using the Article Wizard ↗ to help you create articles.|width=20%|align=right}}
A tag has been placed on :Alia Hafeez ↗ requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion ↗, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement ↗. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://web.archive.org/web/20230712152956/https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.970.8000&rep=rep1&type=pdf<nowiki> </nowiki>and CTRL+F "Alia"; it's on page 22. The paragraph is pasted essentially word for word. I think we nuke this.. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of ''information'', but not as a source of ''sentences''. This part is crucial: ''say it in your own words''. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators '''will be blocked from editing ↗'''.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you ''must'' verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials ↗. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission ↗ for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy ↗ for more details, or ask a question here ↗.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may '''contest the nomination''' by visiting the page ↗ and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines ↗.  jolielover♥talk 18:11, 13 June 2026 (UTC)

:Category:Count's Feud ↗ has been nominated for deletion

<div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">48px|alt=|link= ↗</div>:Category:Count's Feud ↗ has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization ↗ guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at '''the category's entry ↗''' on the categories for discussion ↗ page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 06:16, 14 June 2026 (UTC)

Topic: Slavery in Qatar

I reverted the edit in the '''“Slavery in Qatar”''' article because the statement specifically mentioning the Baloch is not supported by the cited source. The reference provided does not identify a specific page where this claim can be verified; instead, it cites a work spanning more than 300 pages without indicating the relevant page. Such a citation is insufficient to verify a specific and potentially contentious claim. Unless a reliable source with the exact page supporting this statement is provided, the material should not be included in the article. Saoud54321 (talk) 16:43, 4 July 2026 (UTC)
:Stop removing references information. If you do not stop, you may be reported and blocked. You have been warned. Thank you.--Aciram (talk) 21:21, 4 July 2026 (UTC)
::Hello, I have ceased making direct edits to the article. Instead, I have posted proposed text revisions on the talk pages of the articles concerning slavery in the Gulf states. These revisions are intended to provide a more accurate historical context and are supported by reliable, cited sources. I would appreciate it if you could review them when you have the time. Thank you. Saoud54321 (talk) 15:33, 6 July 2026 (UTC)

Subject: Inquiry regarding my recent edits

Hello, I would like to ask for clarification regarding the repeated reversion of my recent edits to the article.
I have tried to ensure that my contributions are accurate, supported by reliable sources, and consistent with the existing content. My intention was only to clarify the historical background and origins of the groups that migrated from Africa to Balochistan while preserving the existing information and references.
I acknowledge that in my first edit I accidentally removed a source, but I corrected that issue in later edits and kept the original references intact.
Regarding your note that I should add my text without removing the existing content, I would like to clarify that I did not intend to remove any information. My edits were mainly focused on clarifying and improving the wording of the existing text, not deleting or replacing important content. If any part of my edit appeared to remove information, it was not my intention.
Could you please explain the specific concerns with these edits? If there are any issues related to wording, sourcing, or Wikipedia policies, I would appreciate your guidance so I can make the necessary adjustments and ensure my edits align with the required standards.
Thank you for your time and assistance. Saoud54321 (talk) 00:59, 7 July 2026 (UTC)

CfD nomination at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2026 July 9 § Category:American slaves ↗

<div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">48px|alt=|link= ↗</div>Categories you have created have been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization ↗ guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at '''Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2026 July 9 § Category:American slaves ↗''' on the categories for discussion ↗ page. Thank you. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄ ↗) 15:46, 9 July 2026 (UTC)

User Talk: Aciram

CfD nomination at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2026 May 10 §&nbsp;"Somalian" to "Somali" across the board ↗