W
Active Editors
Back to Profile

User Talk: AndyMeven

Server-side rendered snapshot of this editor's Wikipedia talk page discussions.

Welcome!



Hello, AndyMeven, and welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate encyclopedic contributions, but some of your recent contributions ↗, such as your edit to the page :Camperdown Works ↗, seem to be advertising or for promotional purposes ↗. Wikipedia does not allow advertising. For more information on this, please see:
If you still have questions, there is a new contributors' help page ↗, or you can {{edit|Special:MyTalk|click here to ask a question on your talk page|section=new|preload=Help:Contents/helpmepreload|preloadtitle=Help me!}}. You may also find the following pages useful for a general introduction to Wikipedia:
I hope you enjoy editing Wikipedia! Please sign your name ↗ on talk pages using four tildes (<nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Feel free to write a note on the bottom of User talk:Dmartin969{{!}}my talk page if you want to get in touch with me. Again, welcome! <!-- Template:Welcomespam --> –DMartin ↗ 13:29, 15 December 2020 (UTC)

December 2020



25px|alt=Information icon ↗ Hello, I'm Dmartin969. I wanted to let you know that one or more external links you added&nbsp;to :Basil Crockett ↗ have been removed because they seemed to be inappropriate for an encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page ↗, or take a look at our guidelines ↗ about links. Thank you. {{PAGENAME}} ↗<!-- Template:uw-spam1 --> –DMartin ↗ 13:31, 15 December 2020 (UTC)

25px|alt=Information icon ↗Please do not places links to websites outside of wikiepdia into the body of an article, as you have done at Basil Crockett ↗ and Camperdown Works ↗ . Wikiepdia has an external linking policy ↗, whcih explains when linking to external sites is and is not appropriate. I have reverted your edits that appear to be in violation of this policy. If have you have any qeustions please leave a message on my talk page.  –DMartin ↗ 13:42, 15 December 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation ↗: George Addison Cox ↗ (December 2)


<div style="border: solid 1px #FCC; background-color: var(--background-color-warning-subtle, #fdf2d5); color: inherit; padding: 0.5em 1em; margin: 1.5em; width: 90%;"> 50px|left ↗Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation ↗ has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time.<nowiki> </nowiki>The reason left by Monkeysmashingkeyboards was:

{{divbox|gray|3=This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article ↗—that is, they do not show ''significant'' coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in ''published'', ''reliable'' ↗, ''secondary'' ↗ sources that are ''independent ↗'' of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people ↗). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help ↗ and learn about mistakes to avoid ↗ when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.|}}<!--
--
-->&nbsp;The comment the reviewer left was:

{{divbox|blue|3=Sources do not have significant coverage of the subject.}} Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit ''after they have been resolved''.
{{clear}}

<span style="color:#ff00ff">monkey</span><sub style="color:#aa22aa">smashing</sub><sup style="color:#aa66aa">keyboards</sup> (talk) 21:15, 2 December 2025 (UTC)</div><!--Template:AfC decline-->

{| style="margin: 0.4em 2em;"
|- style="vertical-align: top;"
| alt=Teahouse logo ↗
| <div style="background-color:#e1e6db; color: #393D38; padding: 1em; font-size: 1.1em; border-radius:10px;box-shadow:-2px -2px 1px #8e8a78;">Hello, '''AndyMeven'''!
Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the '''Articles for creation help desk ↗'''. If you have any ''other'' questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the '''Teahouse ↗''', a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! <span style="color:#ff00ff">monkey</span><sub style="color:#aa22aa">smashing</sub><sup style="color:#aa66aa">keyboards</sup> (talk) 21:15, 2 December 2025 (UTC)</div>
|}<!-- Wikipedia:Teahouse/AfC Invitation -->
Category:Wikipedians who have received a Teahouse invitation through AfC ↗

Your submission at Articles for creation ↗: John Sinclair of Lochaline ↗ has been accepted


<div style="border:solid 1px #57DB1E; background:var(--background-color-success-subtle, #dff2eb); padding: 0.5em 1em; color: inherit; margin: 1.5em; width: 90%;">50px|left ↗ '''John Sinclair of Lochaline ↗, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.'''<br />

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

<div class="autoconfirmed-show">Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself ↗ without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation ↗ if you prefer.</div>

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the '''<span class="plainlinks" >[//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/New_question&withJS=MediaWiki:AFCHD-wizard.js&page=John_Sinclair_of_Lochaline help desk]</span>'''.<span class="unconfirmed-show"> Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself ↗ without posting a request to Articles for creation ↗.</span>

Thanks again, and happy editing!
<span style="color:#ff00ff">monkey</span><sub style="color:#aa22aa">smashing</sub><sup style="color:#aa66aa">keyboards</sup> (talk) 19:15, 3 December 2025 (UTC)</div><!--Template:AfC accept-->

AfC ↗ notification: Draft:Angus Eric Methven Sinclair-Thomson ↗ has a new comment


<div style="border:solid 1px #9accf6;background:#f1f9ff; padding: 0.5em 1em; color: #000; margin: 1.5em; width: 90%;"> 50px|left ↗
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Angus Eric Methven Sinclair-Thomson ↗. Thanks! <span style="color:#0F08D1; font-weight:bold;"> CONFUSED SPIRIT</span><span style="font-size:60%; color:#0000FF; position:relative; top:0px; margin-left:4px;">(Thilio).Talk</span> 09:15, 6 December 2025 (UTC) </div>

:Thank you for your helpful advice. I have deleted the link and will get copyright permission before using the image again. AndyMeven (talk) 12:35, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
:Thank you for picking this up and I have amended the link AndyMeven (talk) 10:34, 10 December 2025 (UTC)

Speedy deletion ↗ nomination of :File:Plaque on Lochaline House ruins.png ↗


48px|left|alt=|link= ↗

A tag has been placed on :File:Plaque on Lochaline House ruins.png ↗ requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion ↗, because it is a copyright violation ↗ and has no credible claim of non-free use ↗ or permission. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators '''will be blocked from editing ↗'''.

If the image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use it — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you ''must'' verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials ↗. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission ↗ for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy ↗ for more details, or ask a question here ↗.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may '''contest the nomination''' by visiting the page ↗ and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines ↗. <!-- Template:Db-imgcopyvio-notice --> <!-- Template:Db-csd-notice-custom --> — Ирука<sup>13 ↗</sup> 12:03, 6 December 2025 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation ↗: Angus Eric Methven Sinclair-Thomson ↗ (December 22)


<div style="border: solid 1px #FCC; background-color: var(--background-color-warning-subtle, #fdf2d5); color: inherit; padding: 0.5em 1em; margin: 1.5em; width: 90%;"> 50px|left ↗Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation ↗ has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time.<nowiki> </nowiki>The reason left by Mikeycdiamond was:

{{divbox|gray|3=Your draft shows signs of having been generated by a large language model ↗, such as ChatGPT. '''Wikipedia guidelines prohibit the use of LLMs ↗ to write articles from scratch.''' In addition, LLM-generated articles usually have multiple quality issues, to include:<br />
Please address these issues. The best way is usually to read reliable sources ↗ and summarize them, instead of using a large language model. See our help page on large language models ↗.|}}<!--
--
--> Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit ''after they have been resolved''.
{{clear}}

Mikeycdiamond (talk) 12:32, 22 December 2025 (UTC)</div><!--Template:AfC decline-->

AfC ↗ notification: Draft:Angus Eric Methven Sinclair-Thomson ↗ has a new comment


<div style="border:solid 1px #9accf6;background:#f1f9ff; padding: 0.5em 1em; color: #000; margin: 1.5em; width: 90%;"> 50px|left ↗
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Angus Eric Methven Sinclair-Thomson ↗. Thanks! Mwen Sé Kéyòl Translator-a (talk) 10:03, 26 January 2026 (UTC) </div>

:Thank you for your helpful comment on Draft:Angus Eric Methven Sinclair-Thomson ↗ and I have deleted Sources 24 and 25 and replacing them with: ''The V.C. and D.S.O.'' (Creagh), page 427. ''The London Gazette'', 12 March 1915, page 2499 AndyMeven (talk) 15:59, 26 January 2026 (UTC)
::Ok, there was no need to fully delete them but simply find what entry mentions him directly, howeve thank you for adding a good source, keep working and it should be good Mwen Sé Kéyòl Translator-a (talk) 16:19, 26 January 2026 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation ↗: Angus Eric Methven Sinclair-Thomson ↗ (January 27)


<div style="border: solid 1px #FCC; background-color: var(--background-color-warning-subtle, #fdf2d5); color: inherit; padding: 0.5em 1em; margin: 1.5em; width: 90%;"> 50px|left ↗Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation ↗ has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time.<nowiki> </nowiki>The reason left by CostalCal was:

{{divbox|gray|3=Your draft shows signs of having been generated by a large language model ↗, such as ChatGPT. '''Wikipedia guidelines prohibit the use of LLMs ↗ to write articles from scratch.''' In addition, LLM-generated articles usually have multiple quality issues ↗, to include:<br />
Please address these issues. The best way is usually to read reliable sources ↗ and summarize them, instead of using a large language model. See our help page on large language models ↗.|}}<!--
--
-->&nbsp;The comment the reviewer left was:

{{divbox|blue|3=This article uses an LLM for most of the article.}} Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit it ''after they have been resolved''.
{{clear}}

CostalCal (talk) 06:33, 27 January 2026 (UTC)</div><!--Template:AfC decline-->

:See my response on 2 January 2026 on the Talk page. I stand by this and not sure what more I can say.
:== Resubmission note on sources and authorship ==
:The research, structure, sourcing and factual content of this draft are entirely my own work, based on primary and secondary historical sources including archival material, regimental publications, newspapers and the London Gazette. I used limited assistance only to help locate sources and to check that the prose meets Wikipedia’s neutral, encyclopaedic tone and style guidance. No content was generated wholesale, and all statements in the article are supported by cited sources. AndyMeven (talk) 12:39, 2 January 2026 AndyMeven (talk) 08:21, 27 January 2026 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation ↗: Angus Eric Methven Sinclair-Thomson ↗ (March 12)


<div style="border: solid 1px #FCC; background-color: var(--background-color-warning-subtle, #fdf2d5); color: inherit; padding: 0.5em 1em; margin: 1.5em; width: 90%;">'''Draft declined'''{{pb}}50px|left ↗Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Your draft submission to Articles for creation ↗ has been reviewed but not accepted at this time.{{pb}}
<nowiki> </nowiki>'''Feedback'''{{pb}}The reviewer, Suitskvarts, left the following feedback:
{{divbox|gray|3=This draft appears to be generated by a large language model ↗ (such as ChatGPT). You should not use LLMs ↗ to write articles from scratch.
LLM-generated pages with the below issues may be deleted without notice ↗.

These tools are prone to specific issues that violate our policies:

Instead, only summarize in your own words a range of independent, reliable, published sources ↗ that discuss the subject.

See the advice page on large language models ↗ for more information.|}}<!--
--
-->

'''Next steps'''

'''Need help?'''

'''Scam warning'''
Suitskvarts (talk) 17:21, 12 March 2026 (UTC)</div><!--Template:AfC decline-->

:Hello Suitskvarts,
:Thank you for reviewing my draft article on Angus Eric Methven Sinclair-Thomson. I can assure you that the research, sources and structure are entirely my own work. I have spent a considerable time researching the subject and the article is based on archival material, regimental histories, the London Gazette, and other published sources.
:As a relatively new Wikipedia editor, I have occasionally used ChatGPT only for limited assistance in locating sources and checking that the wording follows Wikipedia’s neutral encyclopaedic style. No content in the article was generated wholesale.
:If there are particular passages or aspects of the draft that appear problematic or unencyclopedic, I would be grateful if you could indicate them so that I can revise the article appropriately before resubmitting.
:Many thanks for your time
:AndyMeven AndyMeven (talk) 11:09, 13 March 2026 (UTC)

About your edit on Camperdown Works ↗



Your edit https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Camperdown_Works&curid=37659053&diff=1343825922&oldid=1343600007|edit ↗ on Camperdown Works ↗ reads like AI. Especially the sentence, "[...] reportedly coordinated the work of about 300 weavers in the Lochee area, illustrating the scale of textile production already present in the district." I'm not quite sure how to go about this, as you've previously been warned for using LLMs to add content to Wikipedia. I'm going to go ahead and revert the edit. <span style="font-family:Verdana;color:#30232c;background-color:#f5dceb;">jiraijohnny˚₊‧꒰ა ♡ ໒꒱ ‧₊˚</span> (KISS ME GOOD-BYE.⋆˚꩜｡) 17:00, 16 March 2026 (UTC)

:Thank you for flagging this and I appreciate the concern.
:The wording I added is based on published sources (particularly Whatley & Tomlinson, ''The Triumph of Textiles''). I had become concerned that this article might give the impression that the jute industry in Dundee developed in isolation, and I was trying to reflect the link historians make with the earlier linen industry.
:I can see that the wording comes across as too generalised and impersonal in places, and I’m very happy to rephrase or tighten the sentence, perhaps by attributing the point more directly to the source. Please let me know if you would prefer a shorter or more closely cited version.
:Thanks again for taking the time to review the edit. AndyMeven (talk) 10:30, 17 March 2026 (UTC)
::Well, your edit was not quite "too generalized and impersonal," it added unnecessary puffery and details like the exact amount of weavers at the complex. In addition, your response reads to me like AI. I'd like to have a discussion with you in your own words, if possible. <span style="font-family:Verdana;color:#30232c;background-color:#f5dceb;">jiraijohnny˚₊‧꒰ა ♡ ໒꒱ ‧₊˚</span> (KISS ME GOOD-BYE.⋆˚꩜｡) 13:00, 17 March 2026 (UTC)
:::In light of your comments, I’ve reassessed my edit and agree that parts of it may come across as unnecessary or over-elaborate, which wasn’t my intention. I was aiming to give a little more context on the background to Dundee’s jute industry, but I agree that this may not be needed here. On reflection, the existing sentence at the end of the ‘History’ section is probably sufficient: “The firm was quick to adopt the most recent improvements and moved over from the linen trade to jute trade.” So, to be clear, I’m content to leave the article as you have edited it, and thank you for taking the time to review and comment. AndyMeven (talk) 10:45, 18 March 2026 (UTC)
::::Are you using AI to generate your replies to me? <span style="font-family:Verdana;color:#30232c;background-color:#f5dceb;">jiraijohnny˚₊‧꒰ა ♡ ໒꒱ ‧₊˚</span> (KISS ME GOOD-BYE.⋆˚꩜｡) 12:37, 18 March 2026 (UTC)
:::::No - I’m writing these replies myself. I’m just trying to respond carefully and keep things clear and neutral in line with Wikipedia style. As I’ve said, I’m happy to leave the article as it now stands. Thank you again for your time. AndyMeven (talk) 13:58, 18 March 2026 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation ↗: Angus Eric Methven Sinclair-Thomson ↗ (March 18)


<div style="border: solid 1px #F99; background-color: var(--background-color-destructive-subtle, #F8EEBC); padding: 0.5em 1em; color: inherit; margin: 1.5em; width: 90%;"> 50px|left ↗
'''Draft rejected'''<br>
Your draft submission to Articles for creation ↗ has been rejected and cannot be resubmitted.
{{pb}}
<nowiki> </nowiki>'''Reason for rejection'''{{pb}}The reviewer, ThatTrainGuy1945, left the following feedback:
{{divbox|gray|3=The subject is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia ↗.|}}<!--
--
-->{{divbox|blue|3=This draft appears to be generated by a large language model (such as ChatGPT). You should not use LLMs to write articles from scratch.
LLM-generated pages with the below issues may be deleted without notice.

These tools are prone to specific issues that violate our policies:

hallucinations: they often invent false information and cite non-existent references.
unencyclopedic tone: they tend to be vague, promotional, or essay-like, rather than neutral and factual.
copyright issues: they may closely paraphrase existing text, leading to copyright violations.
Instead, only summarize in your own words a range of independent, reliable, published sources that discuss the subject.

See the advice page on large language models for more information.


This seems notable; however you must stop using AI and resubmitting this without changes. Notice the random bolding. (Also, on a general note, add in some periods and citations come after commas.)}}
'''Next steps'''

'''Scam warning'''

{{clear}}
🚂<span style="color:blue"><b>That</b></span><span style="color:red"><b>Train</b></span><span style="color:blue"><b>Guy</b></span><span style="color:red"><b>1945</b></span> <sup>Peep peep!</sup> 11:52, 18 March 2026 (UTC)</div><!--Template:AfC reject-->

:Thank you for your helpful comments. I have revised the draft accordingly and have learned a great deal from this particular editing and review process. AndyMeven (talk) 17:32, 19 March 2026 (UTC)
::Do you use AI to communicate? 🚂<span style="color:blue"><b>That</b></span><span style="color:red"><b>Train</b></span><span style="color:blue"><b>Guy</b></span><span style="color:red"><b>1945</b></span> <sup>Peep peep!</sup> 00:52, 20 March 2026 (UTC)
:::No - I write my own messages and I am genuinely grateful for your constructive feedback, and I have found the review process very helpful. AndyMeven (talk) 08:32, 20 March 2026 (UTC)
::::Hello, and thank you again for your earlier comments. Following the recent advice from ChrysGalley, I understand that I should have come back to you to resolve any outstanding issues before resubmitting the draft. I have now gone carefully through the article and made a number of changes, including improving the references, tightening the wording, and removing anything that read more like a “name-check” of sources rather than a summary of them. I have tried to follow advice as closely as I can and to bring the article into a more standard Wikipedia style. I would be very grateful if you could take another look and let me know whether the main concerns you raised have now been addressed. AndyMeven (talk) 10:46, 20 March 2026 (UTC)
:::::You haven't. I don't know why you're simply telling the AI to lie to me. I don't appreciate it. 🚂<span style="color:blue"><b>That</b></span><span style="color:red"><b>Train</b></span><span style="color:blue"><b>Guy</b></span><span style="color:red"><b>1945</b></span> <sup>Peep peep!</sup> 11:33, 20 March 2026 (UTC)
::::::I have spent a considerable amount of time revising the article in line with the feedback received, including addressing points on sourcing, notability, and style. In particular, I have strengthened the use of independent sources and tightened how they are summarised within the article. If there are still specific concerns, I would be very grateful if you could indicate them so that I can address them directly. AndyMeven (talk) 13:55, 20 March 2026 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation ↗: Angus Eric Methven Sinclair-Thomson ↗ (March 20)


<div style="border: solid 1px #F99; background-color: var(--background-color-destructive-subtle, #F8EEBC); padding: 0.5em 1em; color: inherit; margin: 1.5em; width: 90%;"> 50px|left ↗
'''Draft rejected'''<br>
Your draft submission to Articles for creation ↗ has been rejected and cannot be resubmitted.
{{pb}}
<nowiki> </nowiki>'''Reason for rejection'''{{pb}}The reviewer, ChrysGalley, left the following feedback:
{{divbox|gray|3=The subject does not meet Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion ↗.|}}<!--
--
-->{{divbox|blue|3=This is not a new review as such, so don't be disheartened. Kindly read this section, since there is a perception that you are not reading the advice offered. This draft was rejected earlier by user:ThatTrainGuy1945 ↗ and that generated a plate on your Talk page which explains what you have to do. I am rejecting this because it's not clear that you have followed that advice and that process, namely entered into discussion with user:ThatTrainGuy1945 ↗ about the draft and then user:ThatTrainGuy1945 ↗ makes the call as to whether to lift the rejection. It's not your call (or mine).
What I will say is that the last section is a version of WP:AIATTR ↗ - so rather than summarise that 1961 obituary's content and merely reference the source, it has LLM style started with name-checking the source and not really mentioning the contents, wrong way around, and contrary to the purposes of this project: Wikipedia is a summary of sources, not a name-check of sources that may or may not be worth summarising. LLM gave you that initial set of wording and no amount of word-mashing will get you around that, you have to forget that section, go to the sources, summarise them and put the citations in. You don't need to mention the Wasp and the Eagle per se, except within the reference citation, since W&E is not part of this subject's life or legacy.}}
'''Next steps'''

'''Scam warning'''

{{clear}}
ChrysGalley (talk) 09:06, 20 March 2026 (UTC)</div><!--Template:AfC reject-->

:Thank you for your comments and guidance. I have now carefully revised the article in line with the advice given, including reworking sections to ensure that sources are summarised rather than highlighted, and making further improvements to clarity and style. I am also now in discussion with ThatTrainGuy1945 as suggested, and will continue to address any remaining points that are raised. AndyMeven (talk) 10:33, 21 March 2026 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation ↗: George Addison Cox ↗ has been accepted


<div style="border:solid 1px #57DB1E; background:var(--background-color-success-subtle, #dff2eb); padding: 0.5em 1em; color: inherit; margin: 1.5em; width: 90%;">50px|left ↗ '''George Addison Cox ↗, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been accepted!'''<br />

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions. <br />

The article has been assessed as '''Start-Class''', which is recorded on its talk page ↗. Most new articles start out as Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time ↗. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme ↗ to see how you can improve the article.

'''Future articles'''
<div class="autoconfirmed-show">
<div class="unconfirmed-show">

'''Next steps'''
Thanks again, and happy editing!
Nighfidelity (talk) 13:54, 30 April 2026 (UTC)</div><!--Template:AfC accept-->

Your submission at Articles for creation ↗: Angus Eric Methven Sinclair-Thomson ↗ (May 11)


<div style="border: solid 1px #F99; background-color: var(--background-color-destructive-subtle, #F8EEBC); padding: 0.5em 1em; color: inherit; margin: 1.5em; width: 90%;"> 50px|left ↗
'''Draft rejected'''<br>
Your draft submission to Articles for creation ↗ has been rejected and cannot be resubmitted.
{{pb}}
<nowiki> </nowiki>'''Reason for rejection'''{{pb}}The reviewer, Cmajorftw, left the following feedback:
{{divbox|gray|3=The subject is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia ↗.|}}<!--
--
-->
'''Next steps'''

'''Scam warning'''

{{clear}}
<span style="color:#d33; font-family:serif; text-shadow:1px 1px 2px #ccc;">'''C'''major</span><sup><span style="color:#000;">ftw</span></sup> 18:23, 11 May 2026 (UTC)</div><!--Template:AfC reject-->