User Talk: Anthropophoca

Server-side rendered snapshot of this editor's Wikipedia talk page discussions.

Anthropophoca, you are invited to the Teahouse!

{| style="margin: 1em 4em;"
|- valign="top"
| alt=Teahouse logo|link=w:en:WP:Teahouse|File:WP teahouse logo 2.png by User:Heatherawalls, licensed under CC BY-SA 3.0 ↗
| <div style="background-color:#f4f3f0; color: #393D38; padding: 0.4em 1em;border-radius:10px; font-size: 1.1em;">
Hi '''Anthropophoca'''! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. <br />Be our guest at the Teahouse ↗! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like {{noping|Naypta}} (talk ↗).

<div class="submit ui-button ui-widget ui-state-default ui-corner-all ui-button-text-only" role="button" aria-disabled="false" style="float: left;"><span class="ui-button-text">Visit the Teahouse ↗</span></div>

<div style="text-align:right;">We hope to see you there!

<small>Delivered by {{noping|HostBot}} on behalf of the Teahouse hosts ↗</small>

<small>16:10, 28 January 2020 (UTC)</small></div>
</div>
|}
Category:Wikipedians who have received a Teahouse invitation ↗

A belated welcome!

thumb|300px|The welcome may be belated, but the cookies are still warm! File:Face-smile.svg|25px ↗ ↗

Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia ↗, Anthropophoca. I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions ↗. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

Introduction ↗

The five pillars of Wikipedia ↗

Contributing to Wikipedia ↗

How to edit a page ↗

Help pages ↗

How to write a great article ↗

Also, when you post on talk pages ↗ you should sign your name ↗ using four tildes (<nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian ↗! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page, consult Wikipedia:Questions ↗, or place {{tl|help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there.

Again, welcome! <span style="white-space: nowrap;">— Wug·a·po·des</span> 22:31, 29 January 2020 (UTC)

:Thank you for your sentiment! Anthropophoca (talk) 13:26, 31 January 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

<table class="messagebox " style="border: 1px solid #AAA; background: ivory; padding: 0.5em; width: 100%;">
<tr><td style="vertical-align:middle; padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em;">40px ↗</td><td>Hello! Voting in the '''2021 Arbitration Committee elections ↗''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2021|end}}-1 day}}. All '''eligible users ↗''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee ↗ is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process ↗. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans ↗, topic bans ↗, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy ↗ describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates ↗ and submit your choices on the '''2021|poll}}|voting page ↗'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. <small>MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:59, 23 November 2021 (UTC)</small>
</td></tr>
</table>

January 2022

25px|alt=Information icon ↗ Please do not move a page to a title that is harder to follow, or move it unilaterally against naming conventions ↗ or consensus ↗. This includes making page moves while a discussion remains underway. We have some guidelines ↗ to help with deciding what title is best for a subject. If you would like to experiment with page titles and moving, please use the test ↗ Wikipedia. Thank you. BilCat (talk) 05:47, 16 January 2022 (UTC)

Combat Approved ↗ moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Combat Approved ↗, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable ↗, independent sources ↗. <small>(? ↗)</small> Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability ↗ is of central importance ↗ on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace ↗ (with a prefix of "<code>Draft:</code>" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline ↗ and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. ––<span style="color: #0151D2; font-family: Microsoft Sans Serif; letter-spacing: -.5px;font-size:95%;">'''F'''</span><span style="color: #0151D2; font-family: Microsoft Sans Serif; letter-spacing: 0px;font-size:103%;">'''ormal'''</span><span style="color: black; font-family: Microsoft Sans Serif; letter-spacing: -.5px;font-size:95%;">'''D'''</span><span style="color: black; font-family: Microsoft Sans Serif; letter-spacing: -.5px;font-size:105%;">'''ude'''</span> <span style="border-radius:7em;padding:2.5px 3.5px;background:#005bed;font-size:76%"><span style="color:#FFF">'''talk'''</span></span> 03:31, 17 March 2022 (UTC)

:I suppose things have changed since 2012. Anthropophoca (talk) 03:45, 17 March 2022 (UTC)
::Pretty sure this wouldn't fly in 2012 either. ––<span style="color: #0151D2; font-family: Microsoft Sans Serif; letter-spacing: -.5px;font-size:95%;">'''F'''</span><span style="color: #0151D2; font-family: Microsoft Sans Serif; letter-spacing: 0px;font-size:103%;">'''ormal'''</span><span style="color: black; font-family: Microsoft Sans Serif; letter-spacing: -.5px;font-size:95%;">'''D'''</span><span style="color: black; font-family: Microsoft Sans Serif; letter-spacing: -.5px;font-size:105%;">'''ude'''</span> <span style="border-radius:7em;padding:2.5px 3.5px;background:#005bed;font-size:76%"><span style="color:#FFF">'''talk'''</span></span> 03:46, 17 March 2022 (UTC)
:::👍
:::This article will be notable enough once more links to it are added Anthropophoca (talk) 03:54, 17 March 2022 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 6

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Kh-59 ↗, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Gadfly ↗. Such links are usually incorrect ↗, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. <small>(Read the FAQ{{*}} Join us at the DPL WikiProject ↗.)</small>

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 6 April 2022 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Combat Approved ↗

25px|alt=Information icon ↗ Hello, Anthropophoca. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Combat Approved ↗, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted ↗, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it ↗ again or request ↗ that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted ↗ so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 14:02, 26 August 2022 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Combat Approved ↗

48px|left|alt=|link= ↗

Hello, Anthropophoca. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation ↗ submission or Draft ↗ page you started, "Combat Approved ↗".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace ↗, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion ↗. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing.  <span style="font-family:Papyrus; color:#800080;">'''''L'''''iz</span> <sup style="font-family: Times New Roman; color: #006400;">'''''Read!''''' ↗ '''''Talk!'''''</sup> 03:54, 17 September 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

<div class="ivmbox " style="margin-bottom: 1em; border: 1px solid #AAA; background-color: ivory; padding: 0.5em; display: flex; align-items: center; ">
<div class="ivmbox-image" style="padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em; flex: 1 0 40px;">40px ↗</div>
<div class="ivmbox-text">
Hello! Voting in the '''2022 Arbitration Committee elections ↗''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2022|end}}-1 day}}. All '''eligible users ↗''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee ↗ is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process ↗. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans ↗, topic bans ↗, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy ↗ describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates ↗ and submit your choices on the '''2022|poll}}|voting page ↗'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. <small>MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:44, 29 November 2022 (UTC)</small>

</div>
</div>

Your submission at Articles for creation ↗: RSVN ↗ (December 17)

<div style="border: solid 1px #FCC; background-color: #F8EEBC; padding: 0.5em 1em; color: #000; margin: 1.5em; width: 90%;"> 50px|left ↗Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation ↗ has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time.<nowiki> </nowiki>The reason left by Ingenuity was:

{{divbox|gray|3=This is not the correct place to request new redirects. Please follow the instructions at Articles for creation/Wizard-Redirects ↗. Thank you.|}} Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit ''after they have been resolved''.
{{clear}}

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:RSVN ↗ and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.

If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted ↗.

If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior ↗ associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the <span class="plainlinks">[//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:RSVN '''Articles for creation help desk''']</span>, on the <span class="plainlinks">[//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Ingenuity&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:RSVN '''reviewer's talk page''']</span> or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors ↗.

— Ingenuity (talk • contribs ↗) 02:09, 17 December 2022 (UTC)</div>

Your submission at Articles for creation ↗: Yokozuna slickhead ↗ (December 17)

<div style="border: solid 1px #FCC; background-color: #F8EEBC; padding: 0.5em 1em; color: #000; margin: 1.5em; width: 90%;"> 50px|left ↗Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation ↗ has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time.<nowiki> </nowiki>The reason left by EchidnaLives was:

{{divbox|gray|3=We're sorry, but we cannot accept blank submissions. If in fact you did include text within the article, but it isn't showing, please make sure that any extra text above your entry is removed, as it may be causing it to hide and not be shown to the reviewer.|}} Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit ''after they have been resolved''.
{{clear}}

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Yokozuna slickhead ↗ and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.

If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted ↗.

If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior ↗ associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the <span class="plainlinks">[//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Yokozuna_slickhead '''Articles for creation help desk''']</span>, on the <span class="plainlinks">[//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:EchidnaLives&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Yokozuna_slickhead '''reviewer's talk page''']</span> or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors ↗.

<span style="color:#b257f7">echidnaLives</span> - <span style="color:#fcaa3f">talk</span> - <span style="color:#3f78fc">edits</span> ↗ 02:14, 17 December 2022 (UTC)</div>

:Isn't that how you make redirect pages? Anthropophoca (talk) 02:15, 17 December 2022 (UTC)

Speedy deletion ↗ nomination of :Draft:Yokozuna slickhead ↗

48px|left|alt=|link= ↗
{{Quote box|quote=<p>If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article ↗.</p><p>You may want to consider using the Article Wizard ↗ to help you create articles.</p>|width=20%|align=right}}
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page you created, :Draft:Yokozuna slickhead ↗, was tagged as a test page under section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion ↗ and has been or soon may be deleted. Please use the sandbox ↗ for any other test edits you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page ↗ if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may '''contest the nomination''' by visiting the page ↗ and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines ↗. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the {{Querylink|Special:Log|qs=type=delete&page=Draft%3AYokozuna+slickhead|deleting administrator}}, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here ↗.  --<span style="font-family: monospace, monospace; color:#69C;">Minorax</span><sup>«¦'''talk'''¦»</sup> 08:30, 27 December 2022 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 16

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Russian floating nuclear power station ↗, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Entrainment ↗.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 16 February 2023 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:RVSN ↗

25px|alt=Information icon ↗ Hello, Anthropophoca. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:RVSN ↗, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted ↗, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it ↗ again or request ↗ that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted ↗ so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 02:02, 19 May 2023 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:RSVN ↗

25px|alt=Information icon ↗ Hello, Anthropophoca. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:RSVN ↗, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted ↗, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it ↗ again or request ↗ that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted ↗ so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 03:03, 19 May 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion ↗ of :Draft:RVSN ↗

48px|left|alt=|link= ↗
{{Quote box|quote=<p>If this was the first article that you created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article ↗.</p><p>You may want to consider using the Article Wizard ↗ to help you create articles.</p>|width=20%|align=right}}
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page you created, :Draft:RVSN ↗, was deleted as a test page under section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion ↗. Please use the sandbox ↗ for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page ↗ if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines ↗. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, or you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the {{Querylink|Special:Log|qs=type=delete&page=Draft%3ARVSN|deleting administrator}}, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here ↗.  <span style="font-family:Papyrus; color:#800080;">'''''L'''''iz</span> <sup style="font-family: Times New Roman; color: #006400;">'''''Read!''''' ↗ '''''Talk!'''''</sup> 18:48, 16 June 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion ↗ of :Draft:RSVN ↗

48px|left|alt=|link= ↗
{{Quote box|quote=<p>If this was the first article that you created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article ↗.</p><p>You may want to consider using the Article Wizard ↗ to help you create articles.</p>|width=20%|align=right}}
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page you created, :Draft:RSVN ↗, was deleted as a test page under section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion ↗. Please use the sandbox ↗ for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page ↗ if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines ↗. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, or you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the {{Querylink|Special:Log|qs=type=delete&page=Draft%3ARSVN|deleting administrator}}, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here ↗.  <span style="font-family:Papyrus; color:#800080;">'''''L'''''iz</span> <sup style="font-family: Times New Roman; color: #006400;">'''''Read!''''' ↗ '''''Talk!'''''</sup> 18:49, 16 June 2023 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 29

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Operation Alpha (Indonesia) ↗, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Cover story ↗.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 29 October 2023 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 5

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Indonesia–North Korea relations ↗, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Annual ↗ and Biennial ↗.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:07, 5 November 2023 (UTC)

Giant anteater ↗

Hello, I've reverted several edits you made to the article giant anteater ↗ last month, where you added new information without supporting references. Even if some information seems obvious to you (eg "keeping them sharp"), you need to provide sources to support that assertion while editing an article. The source that actually supported the sentence you modified (available here ↗) does not mention keeping claws sharp at all; it hypothesizes that knuckle-walking evolved as a way to keep the long claws out of the way while walking and make it easier to walk. Also, you linked Foraging in the heading; per MOS:HEADINGS ↗, headings should not include links. AryKun (talk) 09:10, 9 November 2023 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 17

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Domestic pigeon ↗, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Fatty ↗.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:00, 17 November 2023 (UTC)

November 2023

25px|alt=Information icon ↗ Please do not add or change content without citing a reliable source ↗. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources ↗ and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. <span style="font-variant:small-caps;border-radius:9em;background:#E0E8E0; color:#1a4c39; padding:4px;">Wracking</span> <sup>talk!</sup> 19:21, 20 November 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

<div class="ivmbox " style="margin-bottom: 1em; border: 1px solid #AAA; background-color: ivory; padding: 0.5em; display: flex; align-items: center; ">
<div class="ivmbox-image" style="padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em; flex: 1 0 40px; max-width: 100px">40px ↗</div>
<div class="ivmbox-text">
Hello! Voting in the '''2023 Arbitration Committee elections ↗''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2023|end}}-1 day}}. All '''eligible users ↗''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee ↗ is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process ↗. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans ↗, topic bans ↗, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy ↗ describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates ↗ and submit your choices on the '''2023|poll}}|voting page ↗'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. <small>MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:59, 28 November 2023 (UTC)</small>

</div>
</div>

Hypalocrinus

Hi there! I noticed you added a new reference to the Hypalocrinus ↗ article. Could you please fix the reference to remove the red error? References should not have both a {{para|page}} and {{para|pages}} parameter. Thanks! GoingBatty (talk) 14:10, 2 July 2024 (UTC)

Disambiguation pages

I see that you have previously been notified by automated processes, but I think you must not have understood that linking to a Wikipedia:Disambiguation ↗ page from the text of an article is not allowed. Figure out which article page to link to or do not add the link. 🌿<span style="color:#254c00">Mt</span><span style="color:#326500">B</span><span style="color:#3e7e00">o</span><span style="color:#4a9700">t</span><span style="color:#57b000">a</span><span style="color:#63ca00">n</span><span style="color:#70e300">y</span> (talk) 16:34, 10 September 2024 (UTC)

:Sorry, but the page did not make it easy to determine which type of hawthorn is the correct one to link to. I did ensure that the page would direct the reader to appropriate section of the disambiguation page to start reading, and as i am more experienced in zoology i did add links that elaborated on the types of animal that utilize quaking aspen ↗ as a food resource. Links that were removed by your reversion. Anthropophoca (talk) 23:52, 10 September 2024 (UTC)

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

<div class="ivmbox " style="margin-bottom: 1em; border: 1px solid #a2a9b1; background-color: #fdf2d5; padding: 0.5em; display: flex; align-items: center; ">
<div class="ivmbox-image noresize" style="padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em;">40px ↗</div>
<div class="ivmbox-text">
Hello! Voting in the '''2024 Arbitration Committee elections ↗''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2024|end}}-1 day}}. All '''eligible users ↗''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee ↗ is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process ↗. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans ↗, topic bans ↗, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy ↗ describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates ↗ and submit your choices on the '''2024|poll}}|voting page ↗'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. <small>MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:46, 19 November 2024 (UTC)</small>

</div>
</div>

Your submission at Articles for creation ↗: Resonating device ↗ has been accepted

<div style="border:solid 1px #57DB1E; background:#E6FFE6; padding: 0.5em 1em; color: #000; margin: 1.5em; width: 90%;">50px|left ↗ '''Resonating device ↗, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.'''<br />

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

<div class="autoconfirmed-show">Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself ↗ without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation ↗ if you prefer.</div>

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the '''<span class="plainlinks">[//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/New_question&withJS=MediaWiki:AFCHD-wizard.js&page=Resonating_device help desk]</span>'''.<span class="unconfirmed-show"> Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself ↗ without posting a request to Articles for creation ↗.</span>

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider {{leave feedback/link|page=Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation|text=leaving us some feedback}}.

Thanks again, and happy editing!
Bobby Cohn (talk) 17:45, 19 November 2024 (UTC)</div>

Moving by copying content within Wikipedia

Hi. Regarding your recent work on pigeon related articles: we are expected to ensure attribution is maintained by methods explained on WP:COPYWITHIN ↗, including the use of {{tl|copied}}. Please apply it as needed. Thanks :) <code style="background:#DFF;white-space:pre">Fred Gandt · talk · contribs ↗</code> 12:59, 17 February 2025 (UTC)

AfC ↗ notification: Draft:Gluvia dorsalis ↗ has a new comment

<div style="border:solid 1px #9accf6;background:#f1f9ff; padding: 0.5em 1em; color: #000; margin: 1.5em; width: 90%;"> 50px|left ↗
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Gluvia dorsalis ↗. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 00:23, 27 February 2025 (UTC) </div>

Your submission at Articles for creation ↗: Gluvia dorsalis ↗ has been accepted

<div style="border:solid 1px #57DB1E; background:#E6FFE6; padding: 0.5em 1em; color: #000; margin: 1.5em; width: 90%;">50px|left ↗ '''Gluvia dorsalis ↗, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.'''<br />

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions. <br />

The article has been assessed as '''Start-Class''', which is recorded on its talk page ↗. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop ↗ over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme ↗ to see how you can improve the article.

<div class="autoconfirmed-show">Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself ↗ without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation ↗ if you prefer.</div>

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the '''<span class="plainlinks" >[//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/New_question&withJS=MediaWiki:AFCHD-wizard.js&page=Gluvia_dorsalis help desk]</span>'''.<span class="unconfirmed-show"> Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself ↗ without posting a request to Articles for creation ↗.</span>

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider {{leave feedback/link|page=Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation|text=leaving us some feedback}}.

Thanks again, and happy editing!
Robert McClenon (talk) 00:26, 27 February 2025 (UTC)</div>

Unattributed copying within Wikipedia

This edit of yours ↗ contains large amounts of unattributed text from other Wikipedia articles. These are copyright violations ↗. Please read carefully the Wikipedia guideline Copying within Wikipedia ↗, and remedy the situation on the affected articles by using their talk pages and/or by making dummy edits on the articles and using the edit comments. – Epipelagic (talk) 02:17, 6 March 2025 (UTC)

:I'll put the copy template on the destination page as well then Anthropophoca (talk) 02:34, 6 March 2025 (UTC)
::Ok i've seen your reversion in the Fish reproduction ↗ page and while i agree i did not discuss this change prior to implementing i used the Template:copy ↗, which is visible in the talk page and provides attribution data. Now that it is also present on both origin and destination pages it should provide enough of a continuity to the editing history Anthropophoca (talk) 02:40, 6 March 2025 (UTC)

::: Thank you — Epipelagic (talk) 01:56, 7 March 2025 (UTC)
::::I still believe that the entry on the fish reproduction page should be a shorter summary, as it did mostly discuss the habits of ceratioids. There's still a hidden comment from who knows when that considered the possibility of an article on sexual parasitism, which is one of the reasons why i created that section on Ceratioidei ↗. As that article discusses the subject matter (and now in more detail), i don't believe there is a need to keep the lengthy explanation on both articles, just one of them, especially when the other form of sexual parasitism, hybridogenesis, only got 5 sentences explaining the phenomenon. Anthropophoca (talk) 03:16, 7 March 2025 (UTC)

::: Feel free to rewrite the section for better balance – Epipelagic (talk) 05:51, 9 March 2025 (UTC)
::::Well if it were up to me i'd just revert to my edit and request Sexual parasitism ↗ to redirect into the section in Ceratioidei ↗ Anthropophoca (talk) 05:58, 9 March 2025 (UTC)

::::: I don't agree with that! Fish reproduction ↗ is an overview article whose purpose is to provide a balanced overview of the topic. Overview articles can provide convenient summaries and wider perpectives where focusing on constituant parts cannot. If your approach was followed, then the overview article would cease to be an overview article, and would merely beome a collection of links. Stripping it of content by moving content elsewhere without acknowledging where you took the content from (which by default means you are claiming the content as your own work) is particularly unconstructive. I'm not sure why you are persisting in what seems like an attack on the article. — Epipelagic (talk) 22:06, 10 March 2025 (UTC)
::::::I thought we'd agreed that using {{template:copied}} is an appropriate way of copying content over to other pages. I've added it to the talk pages of both articles.
::::::In my opinion, an overview article (especially one for the characteristics of an entire class) should summarize the subject matter and lead to a more detailed description on their relevant pages, e;g one such page i made: Resonating device ↗. They should not supplant taxon pages in discussing the specificities of their behavior/anatomy as that is relevant to the discussion as that is within the scope of those articles, unless you prefer order/family/genera pages to just comprise of a list of constituent clades, like ''Pecten ↗''. Taxonomy isn't an "entry-level subject" for zoology, so pages that exclusively deal with it aren't very friendly to laymen, so you'd need to expand it in some way.
::::::By the way, I proposed an overhaul of the Lophiiformes page ↗ and i would appreciate some responses before i start with it. Anthropophoca (talk) 02:57, 11 March 2025 (UTC)

Your GA ↗ nomination of Domestic pigeon ↗

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've Talk:Domestic pigeon/GA1{{!}}begun reviewing ↗ the article Domestic pigeon ↗ you nominated for GA ↗-status according to the criteria ↗. 20px|link= ↗ This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period.   <small>Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Chiswick Chap</small> -- Chiswick Chap (talk) 17:03, 11 March 2025 (UTC)

Your GA ↗ nomination of Domestic pigeon ↗

The article Domestic pigeon ↗ you nominated as a good article ↗ has failed 20px|link= ↗; see Talk:Domestic pigeon ↗ for reasons why Talk:Domestic pigeon/GA1{{!}}the nomination ↗ failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article.   <small>Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Chiswick Chap</small> -- Chiswick Chap (talk) 17:22, 11 March 2025 (UTC)
:Don't give up! CC is a superb reviewer. A bit more polish and time and this article could shine. Regards, 14.2.203.227 ↗ (talk) 07:54, 10 April 2025 (UTC)
::Having a laundry list of fixes is convenient for anyone who wants to fix the page, and for now that is enough. I don't think i can improve it by much more because i do not own pigeon fancying books which are the main source of information for their husbandry. Perhaps you can improve it yourself? I myself probably need more time before i can return to this (I improved many articles in that editing run, mostly moved passages over though, for WP:Scope) Anthropophoca (talk) 09:59, 10 April 2025 (UTC)

AfC ↗ notification: Draft:Hybrid tilapia ↗ has a new comment

<div style="border:solid 1px #9accf6;background:#f1f9ff; padding: 0.5em 1em; color: #000; margin: 1.5em; width: 90%;"> 50px|left ↗
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Hybrid tilapia ↗. Thanks! Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 13:46, 20 March 2025 (UTC) </div>

Your submission at Articles for creation ↗: Hybrid tilapia ↗ has been accepted

<div style="border:solid 1px #57DB1E; background:#E6FFE6; padding: 0.5em 1em; color: #000; margin: 1.5em; width: 90%;">50px|left ↗ '''Hybrid tilapia ↗, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.'''<br />

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions. <br />

The article has been assessed as '''Start-Class''', which is recorded on its talk page ↗. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop ↗ over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme ↗ to see how you can improve the article.

<div class="autoconfirmed-show">Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself ↗ without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation ↗ if you prefer.</div>

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the '''<span class="plainlinks" >[//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/New_question&withJS=MediaWiki:AFCHD-wizard.js&page=Hybrid_tilapia help desk]</span>'''.<span class="unconfirmed-show"> Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself ↗ without posting a request to Articles for creation ↗.</span>

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider {{leave feedback/link|page=Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation|text=leaving us some feedback}}.

Thanks again, and happy editing!
Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 13:47, 20 March 2025 (UTC)</div>

May 2025

25px|alt=Information icon ↗ Hi Anthropophoca! I noticed that you recently made an edit at :Domestic pigeon ↗ and marked it as "minor", but it may not have been. "Minor edit ↗" has a specific definition on Wikipedia: it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections ↗ or reverting obvious vandalism ↗. Any edit that changes the <em>meaning</em> of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Thank you.  <code style="background:#DFF;white-space:pre">Fred Gandt · talk · contribs ↗</code> 13:40, 1 May 2025 (UTC)

:Hello {{ping|Fred Gandt}}, sorry for the inappropriate use of the minor edit tag; i had thought that moving a passage that i had written myself ↗ was not uncalled for. Thanks for your concern! Anthropophoca (talk) 13:54, 1 May 2025 (UTC)
::Just wanted to add that the external links/citations to two online markets you added {{diff2|1287169283|in this edit}} are not appropriate reliable sources ↗ – macaddct1984 <sup>(talk | contribs ↗)</sup> 15:59, 1 May 2025 (UTC)
:::Alright then, please help find a resource that better discusses crop milk substitute formula that does not discuss any branded option, it'll be much appreciated. Anthropophoca (talk) 01:14, 2 May 2025 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Pholidoteuthis adami

25px ↗ Hello! Your submission of Pholidoteuthis adami ↗ at the Did You Know nominations page ↗ has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at '''your nomination's entry ↗''' and respond there at your earliest convenience. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know!  BlueMoonset (talk) 20:12, 20 May 2025 (UTC)

Alicella gigantea stuff

Hello, I saw that you restructured Alicella gigantea. I mostly agree with your changes (and they are appreciated!), but I think there are some things that need to be changed so I thought I'd talk it over with you first. I think that the DNA sequences sentence, phylogeny figure and genome subsection both belong together under a unified genetics section as it previously was. To me, it looks pretty awkward that they are all split up from each other. I like the formatting changes you made to the phylogenetic tree (looks much tidier), but I'd like to flip it horizontally so the root is to the left (this is usually how phylogenetic trees are done in publications). Otherwise I think everything else is reasonable. I might create the gigantism section again later on if I can stitch together enough information on causes/mechanisms etc, but I think it's fine under description for the time being.

Are you planning to make more changes to the page? If so, we should coordinate as I plan to make many more edits (aiming to get this up to good article status).

AxonsArachnida (talk) 17:34, 22 May 2025 (UTC)

:I also appreciate your work on this page, and wish you luck on your efforts to improve the page to GA. I myself plan to improve the page on amphipod ↗s.
:I agree that it's awkward that the passages relating to genetics are split up, but we must remember that the formatting of pages is somewhat important, and the previous placement of the cladogram caused it to "fall through" to the reference list, which is not ideal. When media or templates do that, it's most often a sign that there's not enough text on the page, so i moved it up for visibility. I used the cladeRs for appearance's sake but i can make it right-facing again like it was, and remove the resizing code so it's a full size phylogeny. Seems like the examples of left-facing phylogenies were removed from wiki, so i can't use them for example, but it was related to the practice of selecting images which "face into the text", so to speak, which somewhat improves the appearance of articles.
:I'd certainly prefer if you kept the ordering that i set up (which is kind of the "standard" for taxon pages, like the GA page Bovidae ↗) but i won't stop you from experimenting with it, though i'd recommend consulting Wikipedia:Styletips ↗ when proceeding. One last thing is that phylogenies should have a root taxon, so you should include the family or whatever taxon it is that the phylogeny represents, if it is named.
:Happy editing, and good luck! Anthropophoca (talk) 06:04, 22 May 2025 (UTC)
::How about I bulk up the DNA sentence into a paragraph first, then merge all the genetics stuff into a single section? That way the phylogeny won't spill over into other sections. No need to revert the resizing of the phylogeny though, that's perfectly sized. I'm a bit biased since I've published phylogenies before, but it is exceptionally unusual to see them facing inwards like that. See ''Metrosideros bartletti ↗'' for example. I suppose at the end of the day, the reviewers for GA will have the final say.
::Also I'm organising to get some photos of live Alicella added to Wikicommons (just hashing out a few details with the creator of the images first). They might be useful for your work on the amphipoda page. Would you like me to notify you when they're available? AxonsArachnida (talk) 07:09, 22 May 2025 (UTC)
:::No need, i'll be able to find them myself if i need to. It's nice to have a non-student editor around these parts though Anthropophoca (talk) 07:33, 22 May 2025 (UTC)

DYK for Pholidoteuthis adami

{{ivmbox
|image = Updated DYK query.svg
|imagesize=40px
|text = On 7 June 2025 ↗, '''Did you know ↗''' was updated with a fact from the article '''''Pholidoteuthis adami ↗''''', which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ''... that the male '''pink scaled squid ↗''' has been observed to mate upside down?'' The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Pholidoteuthis adami ↗. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page <small>(here's how, Pholidoteuthis adami ↗)</small>, and the hook may be added to the statistics page ↗ after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page ↗.
}} —Ganesha811 (talk) 00:03, 7 June 2025 (UTC)

Re: Candiru (fish)

Hey, You removed redirect to Vandellia cirrhosa ↗ and expanded Candiru (fish) ↗. I am not an expert on species but it's seems like both are same species as the section '''Alleged attacks on Human''' present in both article. If both are same than you should expand the Vandellia cirrhosa article. also your expansion didn't mention the scientific name of Candiru (your version).––kemel49<sup>(connect)(contri ↗)</sup> 14:07, 10 July 2025 (UTC)

:Please refer to V. cirrhosa's talkpage ↗; i've planned this out for a while. Thanks for the attention. Anthropophoca (talk) 14:10, 10 July 2025 (UTC)
::I don't see any discussion regarding ''Similar-name'' at Talk:Vandellia cirrhosa ↗.––kemel49<sup>(connect)(contri ↗)</sup> 14:13, 10 July 2025 (UTC)
:::I've updated the talkpage link as it has for some reason been archived improperly.
:::The split was based on multiple facts, such as the use of candiru as a common name for multiple species across two disparate families, and the dubious nature of the urethra-crawling thing. We (whatever's left of WikiProject Fish ↗) decided that the ''V. cirrhosa'' page should mainly discuss the actual biology of the fish, while the unconfirmable urethra-crawling was to be moved to the Candiru page, since it's mostly attached to the common name ↗ and the binomial was often given to legitimize the claim (it's suspicious that the type species of the type genus ↗ of Vandelliinae is the only one to do this attack. Similar to how every single domestic betta is ''Betta splendens ↗'' despite known hybridization events...) Anthropophoca (talk) 14:19, 10 July 2025 (UTC)

Fish Taxonomy

Hi Anthropophoca, I see you have been amending Cyprinidae and have put a note on it about outdated taxonomy. In October 2024 WP:Fishes ↗ agreed to use ''Eschmeyer's Catalog of Fishes ↗'' as the source for taxonomy of fishes on and below the level of Order. This means that the systematics section of this article should follow ECoF, other classifications should be discussed in the text. ECoF may have updated its classification of Cyprinidae since the list of subfamilies and genera was last updated, probaby by me, at the start of this year, but if that is not the case then the note you placed on that section should be removed.

Thank you for your interest in WP:Fishes and I hope you will make many more edits to articles covered by the project. Quetzal1964 (talk) 19:22, 20 September 2025 (UTC)

:Speaking of outdated Cyprinidae taxonomy, the Labeoninae ↗ still seems to largely be the version from a decade or more ago, so we need to get onto that. I wish they would just split ''Labeo''... Anthropophoca (talk) 00:00, 21 September 2025 (UTC)
::The list of genera is still based on ECoF and was updated in December 2024. What about the taxonomy is outdated? As I said above ECoF is the source used for the taxonomy of fishes at the level of order and below. ECoF is regularly updated, prior to using ECoF the project used the 5th Edition of ''Fishes of the World ↗'' which was published in 2016. Classifications used by other authors should be discussed in the text of the article, with the appropriate citations. Quetzal1964 (talk) 19:56, 21 September 2025 (UTC)
:::Either way i've removed the banner along with images of species that were split out and not discussed in the text. I believe those were the parts i had issue with.
:::ECoF does not have a more convenient catalog browser to peruse does it? I find it hard to link to a page that gives you just the valid names, which is unlike WoRMS. Anthropophoca (talk) 23:15, 21 September 2025 (UTC)
::::I undertsand that WoRMS follows FishBase for its fish taxonomy. Before we switched to ECof the project used FishBase for genus and species and FotW for taxonomic levels above genus. FishBase is based on ECoF, therefore, so is WoRMS but with a lag. ECoF is updated more quickly than FishBase. We know it's not perfect, for example it doesn't work for extinct, taxa but ECoF was agreed to be the most appropriate source for taxa at the level of order and below. Quetzal1964 (talk) 13:22, 22 September 2025 (UTC)
:::::Well i'm asking if there is something similar to WoRMS' lists, where you can type in a cladename and it retrieves a list of valid and synonymous names that you can then retrieve for Wiki. As i understand it EcoF only displays the giant block of text for every taxon and you can't get anything more concise than that. Anthropophoca (talk) 13:40, 22 September 2025 (UTC)
::::::You can certainly get lists of taxa at the genus and species leverl in ECoF. So if you serach by Genus and enter ''Salmo'' you get {{Cof genus|genus=Salmo|access-date=22 September 2025}}. Quetzal1964 (talk) 15:44, 22 September 2025 (UTC)
:::::::Well as i said, there's a giant block of text detailing the specific publication details, type locality, etc. You don't get a concise list of names, you use a lot of time trimming the "extraneous" information which isn't useful for a synonyms list Anthropophoca (talk) 15:55, 22 September 2025 (UTC)

Deletion discussion about Diagnostic trait ↗

Hello, Anthropophoca

I edit here too, under the username Shocksingularity and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I've asked for a discussion about the redirect Diagnostic trait ↗, created by you. Your comments are welcome at {{sectionlink|Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 October 7#Diagnostic trait}}.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with <code><nowiki>{{Re|</nowiki>Shocksingularity<nowiki>}}</nowiki></code>. And don't forget to sign your reply with <code><nowiki>~~~~</nowiki></code> . Thanks!

<small>(Message delivered via the Page Curation ↗ tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)</small>

Shocksingularity (talk) 01:56, 7 October 2025 (UTC)

ArbCom 2025 Elections voter message

<div class="ivmbox " style="margin-bottom: 1em; border: 1px solid #a2a9b1; background-color: #fdf2d5; padding: 0.5em; display: flex; align-items: center; ">
<div class="ivmbox-image" style="padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em;flex-basis: 40px">40px ↗</div>
<div class="ivmbox-text">
Hello! Voting in the '''2025 Arbitration Committee elections ↗''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2025|end}}-1 day}}. All '''eligible users ↗''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee ↗ is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process ↗. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans ↗, topic bans ↗, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy ↗ describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please review the candidates ↗ and submit your choices on the '''2025|poll}}|voting page ↗'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. <small>MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:46, 18 November 2025 (UTC)</small>

</div>
</div>

Template:Use British English ↗

Can you please clean up ↗ the Giorgia Meloni ↗ article according to the Template:Use British English ↗ in the article (there are some "criticized", AE)?

Why should I?Anthropophoca (talk) 11:56, 14 January 2026 (UTC)
:Because "Use British English" is a website policy, and not wanting to respect it on en.wiki is strange; in any case, do as you wish.
::I have never edited the page on Giorgia Meloni so i do not see how this is relevant to me, random IP account.Anthropophoca (talk) 12:14, 14 January 2026 (UTC)

Reliable sourcing for barbel fish on hippos

Hi, thanks for your intention to improve the Cleaner fish ↗ article, and sorry to have to revert you. However, the addition of doubtfully-sourced claims, combined with editorial reasoning, isn't the way. If there is actual science behind the claims, then we must locate and cite the research in the usual way. In any case, the supposed BBC source is inaccessible ("file not found"), so whatever it may have said, it's not verifiable. Given that there is doubt here, nothing but scientific sourcing will be sufficient. Hope this is all clear to you. Chiswick Chap (talk) 11:22, 28 March 2026 (UTC)

:It seems to be a common issue for media players; on the device that i edited on initially the video did load properly, which is how i was able to identify the featured fish. Either way, the text above the video remains a source for such a claim, though i don't particularly care for the edit to remain Anthropophoca (talk) 11:47, 28 March 2026 (UTC)

''Lycopodina hypogea'' article

Hello Anthropophoca, Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I refer to the article ''Lycopodina hypogea ↗'' created by you and would appreciate it if you could kindly divide the article into sections ↗ for clarity and to improve readability. Regards. <span style="color:#FF4500">QEnigma</span> <span style="color:#0033FF">论</span> 06:58, 4 April 2026 (UTC)

:Hello, I thought that for an article of such short length I wouldn't need to divide it into sections, so I didn't do so. I get that it is better to do so, but unless someone were to write a lede for it I don't really see the need for sectioning. Have a nice day! Anthropophoca (talk) 07:49, 4 April 2026 (UTC)

Your nomination of Ceratioidei ↗ is under review

Your good article nomination ↗ of the article Ceratioidei ↗ is <span class="nowrap">20px|alt=|link= ↗ </span>'''under review'''. See '''Talk:Ceratioidei/GA1{{!}}the review page ↗''' for more information. This may take up to 7 days; feel free to contact the reviewer with any questions you might have.  <small>Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Chiswick Chap</small> -- Chiswick Chap (talk) 12:22, 16 May 2026 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi Anthropophoca. Thank you for your work on Aquaculture of squid ↗. Another editor, Northernhenge, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol ↗ and left the following comment:

{{Bq|1=Thanks for creating this article. In the references, it’s better to also identify publication dates for the sources.}}

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{code|<nowiki>{{Re|</nowiki>Northernhenge<nowiki>}}</nowiki>}}. <small>(Message delivered via the Page Curation ↗ tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)</small>

Northernhenge (talk) 19:13, 16 May 2026 (UTC)

Your nomination of Ceratioidei ↗ has passed

Your good article nomination ↗ of the article Ceratioidei ↗ has <span class="nowrap">20px|alt=|link= ↗ </span>'''passed'''; congratulations! See '''Talk:Ceratioidei/GA1{{!}}the review page ↗''' for more information. If the article is eligible to appear ↗ in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it ↗ within the next seven days. Please also consider reviewing ↗ somebody else's nomination to help keep the backlog down.  <small>Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Chiswick Chap</small> -- Chiswick Chap (talk) 10:01, 19 May 2026 (UTC)

June 2026 GAN Backlog Drive

{| style="border: 5px solid #ABCDEF ; background-color: #FFF; padding:10px 15px 0; color: black"
|style="padding: 0; vertical-align: middle; height: 1.1em; font-size:130%" |'''Good article nominations ↗ |''' <span style="font-size:85%">June 2026 Backlog Drive</span>
|rowspan=3|right|75px ↗
|-
|'''June 2026 Backlog Drive:'''
Do you want to become more experienced in the GA process?

On 1 June, a one-month backlog drive for good article nominations will begin.

Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles reviewed.

Mentors are available, and new reviewers (<6 reviews) get bonus points!

Interested in taking part? You can '''sign up here ↗'''.
|-
|colspan=2|'''Other ways to participate:'''

Join the conversations on our talk page ↗.

|-
|colspan=2 style="font-size:85%; padding-top:15px;"|You're receiving this message because you have participated in a good article review this year or participated in the previous backlog drive.
|}

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:58, 25 May 2026 (UTC)