User Talk: Entropyandvodka
Server-side rendered snapshot of this editor's Wikipedia talk page discussions.
A barnstar for you!
{| style="border: 1px solid gray; background-color: #fdffe7;"
|rowspan="2" style="vertical-align:middle;" | {{#ifeq:{{{2}}}|alt|100px ↗| 100px ↗}}
|rowspan="2" |
|style="font-size: x-large; padding: 0; vertical-align: middle; height: 1.1em;" | '''The Tireless Contributor Barnstar'''
|-
|style="vertical-align: middle; border-top: 1px solid gray;" | You deserve this barnstar for your contributions in the 2026 Iran war. Pachu Kannan (talk) 19:19, 23 March 2026 (UTC)
|}
Please self-revert
Hi, the status quo ante was "ongoing." As per WP:ONUS ↗ the burden to show consensus is on the party that wants to change the status quo. This should not be changed until after the result of the RfC. Please self-revert this https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Template:2026_Iran_war_infobox&curid=82580572&diff=1360657612&oldid=1360652421 ↗. Slava570 (talk) 20:59, 22 June 2026 (UTC)
:Actually, sorry, I just pinged you at AN. Let's discuss there instead since others are already discussing this issue... Slava570 (talk) 21:10, 22 June 2026 (UTC)
::The field before the RfC was actually Result Iranian victory. The RfC began after that change, when edit warring began to break out with multiple editors changing between Iranian victory and Inconclusive, among other things. Changing it back to Ongoing is a means of ignoring the RfC altogether, and the opinions of the editors that have thus far participated. Now another editor has begun yet another RfC before the current RfC has been closed (again). The situation is quite a mess. <span style="color:#Da7301;font-size:small;">entropyandvodka</span> | <span style="color:#0D47A1;font-size:small;">talk</span> 23:25, 22 June 2026 (UTC)