User Talk: Ezéchiel Péquay

Server-side rendered snapshot of this editor's Wikipedia talk page discussions.

Your submission at Articles for creation ↗: Little Johnny Jewel ↗ (December 25)

<div style="border: solid 1px #FCC; background-color: var(--background-color-warning-subtle, #fdf2d5); color: inherit; padding: 0.5em 1em; margin: 1.5em; width: 90%;"> 50px|left ↗Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation ↗ has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time.<nowiki> </nowiki>The reason left by Qcne was:

{{divbox|gray|3=This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article ↗—that is, they do not show ''significant'' coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in ''published'', ''reliable'' ↗, ''secondary'' ↗ sources that are ''independent ↗'' of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics ↗). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help ↗ and learn about mistakes to avoid ↗ when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.|}} Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit ''after they have been resolved''.
{{clear}}

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Little Johnny Jewel ↗ and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.

If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted ↗.

If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior ↗ associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the <span class="plainlinks" >[//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/New_question&withJS=MediaWiki:AFCHD-wizard.js&page=Draft:Little_Johnny_Jewel '''Articles for creation help desk''']</span>, on the <span class="plainlinks" >[//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Qcne&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Little_Johnny_Jewel '''reviewer's talk page''']</span> or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors ↗.

<span style="background-color: #006888; border-radius: 1em; padding: 3px 3px 3px 3px;">'''<span style="color: GhostWhite">qcne</span>''' <small><span style="color: GhostWhite">(talk)</span></small></span> 18:14, 25 December 2025 (UTC)</div>

{| style="margin: 0.4em 2em;"
|- style="vertical-align: top;"
| alt=Teahouse logo ↗
| <div style="background-color:#e1e6db; color: #393D38; padding: 1em; font-size: 1.1em; border-radius:10px;box-shadow:-2px -2px 1px #8e8a78;">Hello, '''Ezéchiel Péquay'''!
Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the '''Articles for creation help desk ↗'''. If you have any ''other'' questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the '''Teahouse ↗''', a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! <span style="background-color: #006888; border-radius: 1em; padding: 3px 3px 3px 3px;">'''<span style="color: GhostWhite">qcne</span>''' <small><span style="color: GhostWhite">(talk)</span></small></span> 18:14, 25 December 2025 (UTC)</div>
|}
Category:Wikipedians who have received a Teahouse invitation through AfC ↗

January 2026

30px|alt=Stop icon ↗ '''You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war ↗, according to the reverts you've made to :Marquee Moon ↗.''' This means that you are repeatedly reverting content back to how you think it should be, despite knowing that other editors disagree. Once it is known that there is a disagreement, users are expected to collaborate ↗ with others, avoid editing disruptively ↗, and try to reach a consensus ↗ – rather than repeatedly reverting the changes made by other users.

Important points to note:
# {{strong|Edit warring is disruptive behavior ↗ – regardless of how many reverts you have made;}}
# {{strong|Do not engage in edit warring – even if you believe that you are right.}}
You need to discuss the disagreement on the article's talk page ↗ and work towards a revision that represents consensus among everyone involved. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard ↗ or seek dispute resolution ↗ if discussions reach an impasse. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection ↗. {{strong|If you continue to engage in edit warring, you may be blocked ↗ from editing.}}  Binksternet (talk) 22:09, 6 January 2026 (UTC)

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion

link=|25px|alt=Information icon ↗
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring ↗ regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring ↗.  Thank you. Binksternet (talk) 00:16, 7 January 2026 (UTC)

January 2026

<div class="user-block uw-pblock" style="padding: 5px; margin-bottom: 0.5em; border: 1px solid var(--border-color-base, #a2ab91); background-color: var(--background-color-warning-subtle, #fef6e7); color:inherit; min-height: 40px">40px|left|alt=Stop icon with clock ↗<div style="margin-left:45px">You have been '''blocked ↗''' from editing from certain pages (:Marquee Moon ↗) for a period of '''2 weeks''' for edit warring ↗. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions ↗. </div><div style="margin-left:45px">During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes ↗ and seek consensus ↗. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution ↗, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection ↗.</div><div style="margin-left:45px">If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks ↗, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: <code><nowiki>{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}</nowiki></code>.  ~ ToBeFree (talk) 02:59, 7 January 2026 (UTC)</div></div>

30px|alt=Stop icon ↗ '''You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war ↗, according to the reverts you've made to :Prove It (Television song) ↗.''' This means that you are repeatedly reverting content back to how you think it should be, despite knowing that other editors disagree. Once it is known that there is a disagreement, users are expected to collaborate ↗ with others, avoid editing disruptively ↗, and try to reach a consensus ↗ – rather than repeatedly reverting the changes made by other users.

Important points to note:
# {{strong|Edit warring is disruptive behavior ↗ – regardless of how many reverts you have made;}}
# {{strong|Do not engage in edit warring – even if you believe that you are right.}}
You need to discuss the disagreement on the article's talk page ↗ and work towards a revision that represents consensus among everyone involved. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard ↗ or seek dispute resolution ↗ if discussions reach an impasse. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection ↗. {{strong|If you continue to engage in edit warring, you may be blocked ↗ from editing.}}  Binksternet (talk) 15:43, 7 January 2026 (UTC)

30px|alt=Stop icon ↗ You may be '''blocked from editing ↗ without further warning''' the next time you change genres in pages without discussion or sources, as you did at :Mortal Primetime ↗.  Doctorhawkes (talk) 10:45, 15 January 2026 (UTC)

:Whoa, relax, I misunderstood, it happens, we're only human, don't be so pedantic. Ezéchiel Péquay (talk) 11:16, 15 January 2026 (UTC)
::18px|link=|alt=🙂 ↗ Hi {{u|Ezéchiel Péquay}}, the practice known as "genre-warring" is such a common thing it has started to annoy editors who actively edit about music, and they are relatively quick to throw warnings around to be able to request administrative action in case an editor just keeps on doing it. Please have a look at {{tl|uw-genre1}} for a more friendly version of the same warning. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 19:57, 15 January 2026 (UTC)

30px|alt=Stop icon ↗ You may be '''blocked from editing ↗ without further warning''' the next time you change genres in pages without discussion or sources, as you did at :Been Stellar ↗.  Doctorhawkes (talk) 01:29, 18 January 2026 (UTC)

30px|alt=Stop icon ↗ Your recent editing history at :Been Stellar ↗ shows that you are currently engaged in an '''edit war ↗'''. This means that you are repeatedly changing a page's content back to how you believe it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree with your changes. Please ''stop editing the page'' and use the '''talk page ↗''' to work toward creating a version of the page that represents consensus ↗ among the editors involved. Wikipedia provides a page explaining how this is accomplished ↗. If discussions reach an impasse, you can request help at a relevant noticeboard ↗ or seek dispute resolution ↗ such as a third opinion ↗. In some cases, you may wish to request page protection ↗ while a discussion to resolve the dispute is ongoing.

'''If you continue edit warring, you may be blocked from editing ↗ Wikipedia'''—especially if you violate the three-revert rule ↗, which states that an editor ''must not perform more than three reverts ↗ on a single page within a 24-hour period''. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, or whether it involves the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also, please keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—'''even if you do not violate the three-revert rule'''— if things indicate that you intend to continue reverting content on the page. Doctorhawkes (talk) 01:52, 18 January 2026 (UTC)

<div class="user-block" style="padding: 5px; margin-bottom: 0.5em; border: 1px solid var(--border-color-base, #a2ab91); background-color: var(--background-color-warning-subtle, #fef6e7); color:inherit; min-height: 40px">40px|left|alt=Stop icon with clock ↗<div style="margin-left:45px">You have been '''blocked ↗''' from editing for a period of '''2 weeks''' for edit warring ↗ while partially blocked for the same behavior. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions ↗. </div><div style="margin-left:45px">If you believe that there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks ↗, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: <code><nowiki>{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}</nowiki></code>.  ~ ToBeFree (talk) 09:19, 18 January 2026 (UTC)</div></div>

Your submission at Articles for creation ↗: $0 (song) ↗ (February 2)

<div style="border: solid 1px #FCC; background-color: var(--background-color-warning-subtle, #fdf2d5); color: inherit; padding: 0.5em 1em; margin: 1.5em; width: 90%;"> 50px|left ↗Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation ↗ has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time.<nowiki> </nowiki>The reason left by ScalarFactor was:

{{divbox|gray|3=This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article ↗—that is, they do not show ''significant'' coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in ''published'', ''reliable'' ↗, ''secondary'' ↗ sources that are ''independent ↗'' of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics ↗). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help ↗ and learn about mistakes to avoid ↗ when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.|}} The comment the reviewer left was:

{{divbox|blue|3=Most coverage seems to be about the song as part of an album, which is not sufficient for WP:NSONG ↗.}} Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit it ''after they have been resolved''.
{{clear}}

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:$0 (song) ↗ and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.

If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted ↗.

If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior ↗ associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the <span class="plainlinks" >[//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/New_question&withJS=MediaWiki:AFCHD-wizard.js&page=Draft:$0_(song) '''Articles for creation help desk''']</span>, on the <span class="plainlinks" >[//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:ScalarFactor&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:$0_(song) '''reviewer's talk page''']</span> or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors ↗.

ScalarFactor (talk) 22:12, 2 February 2026 (UTC)</div>

March 2026

30px|alt=Stop icon ↗ You may be '''blocked from editing ↗ without further warning''' the next time you unconstructively edit Wikipedia using a large language model ↗, as you did at :Talking Heads: 77 ↗. Binksternet (talk) 23:29, 10 March 2026 (UTC)

30px|alt=Stop icon ↗ You may be '''blocked from editing ↗ without further warning''' the next time you violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy ↗ by inserting commentary or your personal analysis into an article, as you did at :All Tomorrow's Parties ↗.  Binksternet (talk) 22:25, 15 March 2026 (UTC)

30px|alt=Stop icon ↗ You may be '''blocked from editing ↗ without further warning''' the next time you change genres in pages without discussion or sources, as you did at :The Velvet Underground ↗.  Doctorhawkes (talk) 03:19, 16 March 2026 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation ↗: Scream from New York, NY ↗ (May 1)

<div style="border: solid 1px #FCC; background-color: var(--background-color-warning-subtle, #fdf2d5); color: inherit; padding: 0.5em 1em; margin: 1.5em; width: 90%;">'''Draft declined'''{{pb}}50px|left ↗Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Your draft submission to Articles for creation ↗ has been reviewed but not accepted at this time.{{pb}}
<nowiki> </nowiki>'''Feedback'''{{pb}}The reviewer, RangersRus, left the following feedback:
{{divbox|gray|3=This draft's references do not show that the subject meets Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion for music ↗. The draft requires either:

evidence that the subject meets any of the ''specific criteria for music ↗;''

'''or''' multiple published secondary ↗ sources that:

provide ''significant coverage ↗'': discuss the subject in detail, not just brief mentions or routine announcements;

are ''reliable ↗'': from reputable outlets with editorial oversight;

are ''independent ↗'': not connected to the subject, such as interviews, press releases, the subject's own website, or sponsored content.

Edit Draft:Scream from New York, NY ↗ to address the points above, making sure to publish any changes.

When you are ready to resubmit your draft for review, click the '''Resubmit''' button.

If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it may be deleted ↗.

'''Need help?'''

For an overview of our policies and guidelines see Everything you need to know ↗.

You can ask for help at the <span class="plainlinks" >[//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/New_question&withJS=MediaWiki:AFCHD-wizard.js&page=Draft:Scream_from_New_York,_NY '''Articles for creation help desk''']</span>, or on the <span class="plainlinks" >[//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:RangersRus&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Scream_from_New_York,_NY '''reviewer's talk page''']</span>.

'''Scam warning'''

If anyone asks you for money or payment to publish, protect, or restore a Wikipedia article or draft, it is a scam. Learn about scams on Wikipedia ↗.

RangersRus (talk) 14:06, 1 May 2026 (UTC)</div>

Your submission at Articles for creation ↗: $0 (song) ↗ (May 23)

<div style="border: solid 1px #FCC; background-color: var(--background-color-warning-subtle, #fdf2d5); color: inherit; padding: 0.5em 1em; margin: 1.5em; width: 90%;">'''Draft declined'''{{pb}}50px|left ↗Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Your draft submission to Articles for creation ↗ has been reviewed but not accepted at this time.{{pb}}
<nowiki> </nowiki>'''Feedback'''{{pb}}The reviewer, Quxyz, left the following feedback:
{{divbox|gray|3=This draft's references do not show that the subject meets Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion for music ↗. The draft requires either:

evidence that the subject meets any of the ''specific criteria for music ↗;''

'''or''' multiple published secondary ↗ sources that:

provide ''significant coverage ↗'': discuss the subject in detail, not just brief mentions or routine announcements;

are ''reliable ↗'': from reputable outlets with editorial oversight;

are ''independent ↗'': not connected to the subject, such as interviews, press releases, the subject's own website, or sponsored content.

Please add references that meet these criteria. If none exist, the subject is not yet suitable for Wikipedia.

It is often easier to prove the notability of an ''album'' or ''artist'' than an ''individual song'' or ''band member''. If the subject is not yet notable, consider improving a relevant existing article instead.|}}{{divbox|blue|3=Pretty much every source I checked fails WP:SIGCOV ↗. I think there was even one source that did not even mention the song (though, it could just be my browser being fickle). There also might be WP:OR ↗ concerns.}}

'''Next steps'''

Edit Draft:$0 (song) ↗ to address the points above, making sure to publish any changes.

When you are ready to resubmit your draft for review, click the '''Resubmit''' button.

If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it may be deleted ↗.

'''Need help?'''

For an overview of our policies and guidelines see Everything you need to know ↗.

You can ask for help at the <span class="plainlinks" >[//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/New_question&withJS=MediaWiki:AFCHD-wizard.js&page=Draft:$0_(song) '''Articles for creation help desk''']</span>, or on the <span class="plainlinks" >[//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Quxyz&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:$0_(song) '''reviewer's talk page''']</span>.

'''Scam warning'''

If anyone asks you for money or payment to publish, protect, or restore a Wikipedia article or draft, it is a scam. Learn about scams on Wikipedia ↗.

<span style="color:#926F17">✶Quxyz✶</span> (talk) 13:43, 23 May 2026 (UTC)</div>

June 2026

30px|alt=Stop icon ↗ '''You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war ↗, according to the reverts you've made to :The Beatles ↗.''' This means that you are repeatedly reverting content back to how you think it should be, despite knowing that other editors disagree. Once it is known that there is a disagreement, users are expected to collaborate ↗ with others, avoid editing disruptively ↗, and try to reach a consensus ↗ – rather than repeatedly reverting the changes made by other users.

Important points to note:
# {{strong|Edit warring is disruptive behavior ↗ – regardless of how many reverts you have made;}}
# {{strong|Do not engage in edit warring – even if you believe that you are right.}}
You need to discuss the disagreement on the article's talk page ↗ and work towards a revision that represents consensus among everyone involved. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard ↗ or seek dispute resolution ↗ if discussions reach an impasse. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection ↗. {{strong|If you continue to engage in edit warring, you may be blocked ↗ from editing.}}  – '''zmbro''' <sub>(talk) (cont ↗)</sub> 14:52, 26 June 2026 (UTC)