User Talk: Zmbro

Server-side rendered snapshot of this editor's Wikipedia talk page discussions.

{{lowercase title}}
{{Archive box|{{hlist|2016–2017 ↗|2018 ↗|2019 ↗|2020 ↗|2021 ↗|2022 ↗|2023 ↗|2024 ↗|2025 ↗}}}}
<div class="center"><big>'''Hi there! I am zmbro and I'm here to make Wikipedia a better and more reliable place. Click here to leave a message. ↗'''</big></div>

Happy New Year, Zmbro!

<div style="border: 3px solid #FFD700; background-color: #FFFAF0; padding:0.2em 0.4em; height:auto; min-height:173px; border-radius:1em; box-shadow:.1em .1em .5em rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.75); box-shadow:.1em .1em .5em light-dark(rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.75), rgba(255, 255, 255, 0.75));" class="plainlinks">
left|x173px ↗x173px|right ↗
{{Paragraph break}}
{{Center|{{resize|179%|'''''Happy New Year ↗!'''''}}}}
'''Zmbro''', Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year ↗, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia.
 OrdinaryOtter (talk) 08:14, 1 January 2026 (UTC) 
</div>
   ''{{resize|88%|Send New Year cheer by adding {{tls|Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.}}''
{{clear}}

Speedy deletion ↗ nomination of :File:Elvis Costello and the Attractions 1979.jpg ↗

48px|left|alt=|link= ↗

A tag has been placed on :File:Elvis Costello and the Attractions 1979.jpg ↗ requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion ↗, because it is a non-free file ↗ from a commercial source (e.g. Associated Press ↗, Getty Images ↗), where the file itself is not the subject of sourced commentary. If you can explain why the file can be used under the non-free content guidelines ↗, please add the appropriate non-free use tag ↗ and rationale.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may '''contest the nomination''' by visiting the page ↗ and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines ↗.    <math>999</math>REAL 💬 ⬆ ↗   19:51, 5 January 2026 (UTC)

Promotion of Blackstar (album) ↗

{{ivmbox
|image = Cscr-featured.svg
|imagesize=60px
|extracss=font-size:1.25em; font-family:Georgia;
|text = Congratulations, Zmbro! The article you nominated, '''Blackstar (album) ↗''', has been promoted to featured status, recognizing it as one of the best articles on Wikipedia. The '''nomination discussion ↗''' has been archived.{{parabr}}This is a rare accomplishment and you should be proud. If you would like, you may nominate it ↗ to appear on the Main page as Today's featured article. Keep up the great work! Cheers, {{user0|Gog the Mild}} via FACBot (talk) 23:05, 7 January 2026 (UTC)
}}

Your nomination of Load (album) ↗ is under review

Your good article nomination ↗ of the article Load (album) ↗ is 20px|alt=|link= ↗ '''under review'''. See '''Talk:Load (album)/GA1{{!}}the review page ↗''' for more information. This may take up to 7 days; feel free to contact the reviewer with any questions you might have.  Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of SignedInteger -- SignedInteger (talk) 14:05, 8 January 2026 (UTC)

Vis a vis your edits on David Bowie

Your decision to revert was good, not sure if you're aware but these edits come from an LTA who has been blocked several times. They have a bunch of technical tells (which is why I know that was them) but their general preoccupation is insisting on vandalizing the term "neo-Nazi" into articles with 0 sources, often of random CEOs and celebrities they don't like, then concern trolling about it when confronted.

Going forward, just revert them for block evasion, debate is useless. No matter what source you bring up, they aren't satisfied, they will misrepresent sources, then admit it don't say this, and then when you call them out will imply you're whitewashing secret neo-Nazi cabals. They have been doing this for several months, and may continue targeting the Bowie page. Just wanted to make you aware. PARAKANYAA (talk) 17:14, 8 January 2026 (UTC)

:{{u|PARAKANYAA}} I appreciate the heads up. The only reason I didn't revert to begin with was that I neglected to see the original revert, and no one had reverted the post I responded to by the time I replied (thinking it was real). I'll keep an eye out for the future and not waste my time with this shit. Thanks! – '''zmbro''' (talk) (cont ↗) 17:16, 8 January 2026 (UTC)

Your nomination of Load (album) ↗ has passed

Your good article nomination ↗ of the article Load (album) ↗ has 20px|alt=|link= ↗ '''passed'''; congratulations! See '''Talk:Load (album)/GA1{{!}}the review page ↗''' for more information. If the article is eligible to appear ↗ in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it ↗ within the next seven days.  Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of SignedInteger -- SignedInteger (talk) 02:26, 9 January 2026 (UTC)

Your nomination of Reload (Metallica album) ↗ is under review

Your good article nomination ↗ of the article Reload (Metallica album) ↗ is 20px|alt=|link= ↗ '''under review'''. See '''Talk:Reload (Metallica album)/GA1{{!}}the review page ↗''' for more information. This may take up to 7 days; feel free to contact the reviewer with any questions you might have.  Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of SignedInteger -- SignedInteger (talk) 02:44, 9 January 2026 (UTC)

Your nomination of Reload (Metallica album) ↗ has passed

Your good article nomination ↗ of the article Reload (Metallica album) ↗ has 20px|alt=|link= ↗ '''passed'''; congratulations! See '''Talk:Reload (Metallica album)/GA1{{!}}the review page ↗''' for more information. If the article is eligible to appear ↗ in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it ↗ within the next seven days.  Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of SignedInteger -- SignedInteger (talk) 04:43, 9 January 2026 (UTC)

WP:BLAR ↗ing of Articles to ''"Heroes"''

Hello there. This is a courtesy notification to let you know that I've just blanked-and-redirected ↗ the articles "Sense of Doubt" and "Neuköln" to ''"Heroes" (album) ↗'', since neither song seemed to have any significant coverage outside of mentions in Bowie biographies or coverage about ''"Heroes"''. As the person who got the album to GA, you are likely the editor with the most knowledge about whether this sort of significant coverage does exist at all for these songs; if so, feel free to reverts these BLARs. Leafy46 (talk) 21:24, 17 January 2026 (UTC)

Your nomination of Hallo Spaceboy ↗ is under review

Your good article nomination ↗ of the article Hallo Spaceboy ↗ is 20px|alt=|link= ↗ '''under review'''. See '''Talk:Hallo Spaceboy/GA1{{!}}the review page ↗''' for more information. This may take up to 7 days; feel free to contact the reviewer with any questions you might have.  Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Ceoil -- Ceoil (talk) 21:46, 18 January 2026 (UTC)

Thank you

Thank you for all of your wonderful work - it was such a delightful brightness to see Ziggy Stardust on main page today. You rock. Netherzone (talk) 01:46, 30 January 2026 (UTC)
{{User QAIbox
| image = Hazel in bloom near Leine, Döhren.jpg
| image_upright = 0.8
| bold = story · music · places
}}
Thank you today for Life on Mars? ↗, "about... David Bowie's 1971 masterpiece "Life on Mars?". Take two, electric boogaloo. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:40, 30 January 2026 (UTC)

:Thank you both so much! Appreciate the kind words :-) – '''zmbro''' (talk) (cont ↗) 17:08, 1 February 2026 (UTC)

DYK for Load (album)

{{ivmbox
|image = Updated DYK query.svg
|imagesize=40px
|image class=skin-invert
|text = On 5 February 2026 ↗, '''Did you know ↗''' was updated with a fact from the article '''''Load (album) ↗''''', which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ''... that the cover artworks for Metallica's '''''Load ↗''''' and '''''Reload ↗''''' were created by mixing blood with semen and urine, respectively?'' The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Reload (Metallica album) ↗. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Load (album) ↗), and the hook may be added to the statistics page ↗ after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to nominate it ↗.
{{DYK views|18,894|787.2|February 2026|Load (album)}} GalliumBot (talk • contribs ↗) (he/it ↗) 03:27, 6 February 2026 (UTC)
}} JuniperChill (talk) 00:07, 5 February 2026 (UTC)

DYK for Reload (Metallica album)

{{ivmbox
|image = Updated DYK query.svg
|imagesize=40px
|image class=skin-invert
|text = On 5 February 2026 ↗, '''Did you know ↗''' was updated with a fact from the article '''''Reload (Metallica album) ↗''''', which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ''... that the cover artworks for Metallica's '''''Load ↗''''' and '''''Reload ↗''''' were created by mixing blood with semen and urine, respectively?'' The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Reload (Metallica album) ↗. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Reload (Metallica album) ↗), and the hook may be added to the statistics page ↗ after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to nominate it ↗.
}} JuniperChill (talk) 00:07, 5 February 2026 (UTC)

CS1 error on Wild Life (Wings album) ↗

25px|alt=|link= ↗ Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have '''automatically detected''' that this edit ↗ performed by you, on the page :Wild Life (Wings album) ↗, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A URL ↗ error. References show this error when one of the URL-containing parameters contains an invalid URL. Please edit the article to add the valid URL. ([//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wild_Life_(Wings_album)&action=edit&minor=minor&summary=Fixing+reference+error+raised+by+%5B%5BUser%3AQwerfjkl%20(bot)%7CQwerfjkl%20(bot)%5D%5D Fix] | [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&preload=User:Qwerfjkl%20(bot)/helpform&preloadtitle=Referencing%20errors%20on%20%5B%5BSpecial%3ADiff%2F1337703590%7CWild%20Life%20(Wings%20album)%5D%5D Ask for help])

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive ↗, you can [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:Qwerfjkl/Botpreload&editintro=User:Qwerfjkl/Boteditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:Qwerfjkl&preloadtitle=Qwerfjkl%20(bot)%20–%20Zmbro&section=new&preloadparams%5b%5d={{FULLPAGENAMEE:Wild Life (Wings album)}}&preloadparams%5b%5d=1337703590 report it to my operator].
Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 00:52, 11 February 2026 (UTC)

Your nomination of Hallo Spaceboy ↗ has passed

Your good article nomination ↗ of the article Hallo Spaceboy ↗ has 20px|alt=|link= ↗ '''passed'''; congratulations! See '''Talk:Hallo Spaceboy/GA1{{!}}the review page ↗''' for more information. If the article is eligible to appear ↗ in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it ↗ within the next seven days.  Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Ceoil -- Ceoil (talk) 00:09, 13 February 2026 (UTC)

TFL notification

Hi, zmbro. I'm just posting to let you know that List of songs recorded by the Smiths ↗ – a list that you have been heavily involved with – has been chosen to appear on the Main Page as Today's featured list ↗ for March 18, 2026. The TFL blurb can be seen here ↗. If you have any thoughts on the selection, please post them on my talk page or at TFL talk ↗. --'''PresN''' 02:48, 17 February 2026 (UTC)

Good Articles

Thank you for your work on Elvis Costello. I agree that it is not GA status (yet.)

His appearances on ''Saturday Night Live'' were mentioned in three places. This seems unnecessary. I merged them.

Bob Dylan has a Featured Article, and rightly. Without GAs are those who followed in his happy wake: Joni Mitchell, Neil Young, Bruce Springsteen, Tom Waits and Elvis Costello. One thing at a time...

I love this quote, on the influences of ''Armed Forces'': "If you're sitting in a station wagon driving from Atlanta to Madison, Wisconsin and listening to Bowie ↗'s ''Low'' ↗ and ''Heroes'' ↗ and Iggy Pop ↗'s ''The Idiot'' ↗ and ''ABBA's Greatest Hits'' ↗ over and over again, that's the kind of record you'll make!" Hollis Hurlbut (talk) 02:49, 15 March 2026 (UTC)

:{{u|Hollis Hurlbut}} These things take time. I still have a bunch of work to do at David Bowie ↗ (already an FA) to bring that article up to modern standards. Problem is, I have other hobbies that gets in the way of WP, as well as other projects and the like. For the future, do NOT nominate articles for GA (and especially FA) unless you've reviewed the GA criteria ↗. Costello's article should have been a given: dozens of uncited paragraphs, a refs needed tag, and improper sources. For example, the wiki fan site ↗ is not a reliable source ↗ (which you cited in this edit ↗). Furthermore, in this edit ↗, you did not provide enough info (see Template:Cite comic ↗). And that only covers sources; Costello's article needs much more on prose writing, musical influences, his jumping from genre to genre, and songwriting style to be even close to GA, but I think it's doable, especially while he's still alive. – '''zmbro''' (talk) (cont ↗) 18:20, 15 March 2026 (UTC)
::Strunk and White write "If those who have studied the art of writing are in accord on any one point, it is this: the surest way to arouse and hold the reader’s attention is by being specific, definite, and concrete." I have tried to that. There was mention of the Byrds influencing Costello's interest in country music. The album was ''Sweetheart of the Rodeo.'' I added it. I have tried to say more with less, as brevity is the soul of wit (the character who says that, Polonius, is long-winded, so that was a joke on Shakespeare's part. Never mind.) I also added quotes around Bowie's "''Heroes''" (I heard Philip Glass's "''Heroes''" symphony ↗ on the radio this morning. Synchronicity?
::I have not read Costello's ''Unfaithful Music and Disappearing Ink'', though I want to. His songwriting is specific, definite and concrete. (I have read Dylan's ''Chronicles: Volume One''. Well-written, but don't expect a lot of answers.)
::The article is far from perfect but, as Lennon and McCartney said, getting better ↗. Hollis Hurlbut (talk) 15:14, 16 March 2026 (UTC)
::I do think the article is getting better. It used to say Costello "neither particularly liked or disliked Presley". I do not think someone who was ambivalent about Elvis would record ''King of America'' with two of Presley's sidemen.
::I think detail is worth adding. I think it's notable that "Watching the Detectives" was inspired by The Clash ↗'s debut ↗ and by Bernard Herrmann ↗'s Hitchcock ↗ scores, as that shows Costello's eclectic affinities. Hollis Hurlbut (talk) 18:00, 18 March 2026 (UTC)
:::It is, but a few minor additions and copyedits will not make it a GA. The article still needs restructuring and an overhaul of sources (particularly in the 2000s era). I would like to see more analysis of his consistent genre-hopping and collaborations, as that feels particularly weak. – '''zmbro''' (talk) (cont ↗) 20:26, 18 March 2026 (UTC)
::::Agreed, the more recent sections seem weaker. What structural changes do you recommend?
::::There was mention of him playing with Green Day. Interesting, I guess, but I'm not sure it's encyclopedically significant. Some things were mentioned redundantly, in many places, like R. White's "Secret Lemonade Drinker" ad. That seems important enough to mention once. Hollis Hurlbut (talk) 23:46, 18 March 2026 (UTC)

Editor of the Week

{| style="border: 2px solid lightgray; background-color: #fafafa" color:#aaa"
|rowspan="2" valign="middle" | 100px ↗
|rowspan="2" |
|style="font-size: x-large; padding: 3; vertical-align: middle; height: 1.1em; color:#606570" |'''Editor of the Week'''
|-
|style="vertical-align: middle; border-top: 2px solid lightgray" |Your ongoing efforts to improve the encyclopedia have not gone unnoticed: You have been selected as Editor of the Week ↗ in recognition of your great contributions! (courtesy of the Wikipedia Editor Retention Project ↗)
|}
User:NegativeMP1 submitted the following nomination for Editor of the Week ↗:
:When I checked the Hall of Fame ↗, and did not find {{user10|Zmbro}} anywhere, I was appalled. Of all editors who work primarily on music articles, Zmbro is among those whose repertoire I look up to the most. With a grand total of 13 featured articles, 17 featured lists, and 69 good articles, his work includes a topic for every single studio album by David Bowie ↗ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Good_topics/David_Bowie_studio_albums ↗, of which all I believe he promoted (or at least most), multiple songs by Bowie (including Life on Mars? ↗ and, one of my personal favorites, "Heroes" (David Bowie song) ↗), multiple albums by Bruce Springsteen ↗ (including the FAs Born in the U.S.A. ↗ and Born to Run ↗), and multiple song lists (including the Beatles ↗, Daft Punk ↗, and Led Zeppelin ↗). He's also reviewed a great number of nominations, including some of my own, to which I will say that he is an incredible reviewer and has even helped add content I initially missed https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Spit_Out_the_Bone&oldid=1290869975 ↗. On multiple occasions, I have checked one or more of the articles he has worked on as a frame of reference on how to structure my own contributions. And with as expansive and impressive of a list of works as his, I can't imagine I'm the only one. This nomination was seconded by TechnoSquirrel69 and Gog the Mild.
You can copy the following text to your user page to display a user box proclaiming your selection as Editor of the Week:
<syntaxhighlight lang="wikitext">{{User:UBX/EoTWBox}}</syntaxhighlight>
{{WP:WikiProject Editor Retention/Editor of the Week/Infobox
| recipient = Zmbro
| week_start_date = March 22, 2026
| mini_bio = Zmbro's extensive and high-quality work on Wikipedia's music articles over the years is applauded. With a grand total of 13 featured articles, 17 featured lists, and 69 good articles, his work includes a topic for every single studio album by David Bowie ↗ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Good_topics/David_Bowie_studio_albums ↗, multiple songs by Bowie (including Life on Mars? ↗ and "Heroes" (David Bowie song) ↗), multiple albums by Bruce Springsteen ↗ (including the FAs Born in the U.S.A. ↗ and Born to Run ↗), and multiple song lists (including the Beatles ↗, Daft Punk ↗, and Led Zeppelin ↗). He's also reviewed a great number of nominations while adding content other editors may have missed.
| recognized_for = promoting music articles
| notable_works = 
| image = David-Bowie Chicago 2002-08-08 photoby Adam-Bielawski-cropped.jpg
| caption = 
| image_size = 200px
}}
Thanks again for your efforts! '''Buster Seven'''''' Talk''' (UTC) 20:37, 21 March 2026 (UTC)

Edit to David Bowie, 'The Man Who sold the World'.

Bowie's 'The Man Who sold the World' was described in one little part of the Wiki piece about it as being and being close to heavy metal (after being compared to hard rock several times). It is not heavy metal and to describe it as heavy metal demeans it. Early Black Sabbath, Deep Purple and Led Zeppelin were not heavy metal bands either, they were hard rock bands. Judas Priest was probably one of the first heavy metal bands, Very loud, screaming vocals, fast, very high energy, that's heavy metal, The Man Who Sold The World is art and if it must be labeled, it should be called something like hard art rock. From a 73 year old hard rock bassist who dislikes most heavy metal. Bobyoung53 (talk) 00:47, 7 April 2026 (UTC)

:Hey there. Heavy metal as a genre began as a branch of hard rock. Early Sabbath and Zeppelin have very much been described as heavy metal, even if what the genre became later on in the 70s and 80s diverged from the early beginnings. Nevertheless, the genre began somewhere, and it's been widely established that heavy metal began in the late 60s and really came to prominence and contributed to the genre's development with bands like Sabbath (saying Sabbath wasn't heavy metal is frankly just plain wrong and demeaning to them).
:More importantly, Wikipedia operates under what reliable sources say about the topics at hand. The provided sources compare ''Man'' as heavy metal, as that's what they should say. We can come across information we disagree with, but changing that doesn't make it true. You also saying you dislike most heavy metal introduces bias, and WP is built on neutrality. I hope this helped. – '''zmbro''' (talk) (cont ↗) 15:00, 7 April 2026 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi Zmbro. Thank you for your work on List of songs recorded by Depeche Mode ↗. Another editor, Aszx5000, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol ↗ and left the following comment:

{{Bq|1=These are perfectly created articles - you should be autopatrolled ↗? thanks.}}

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{code|<nowiki>{{Re|</nowiki>Aszx5000<nowiki>}}</nowiki>}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation ↗ tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Aszx5000 (talk) 20:00, 18 April 2026 (UTC)

Autopatrolled granted

right|80px ↗
Hi Zmbro, I just wanted to let you know that I have added ↗ the autopatrolled user right ↗ to your account. This means that pages you create will automatically be marked as 'reviewed', and no longer appear in the new pages feed ↗. Autopatrolled is assigned to prolific creators of articles, where those articles do not require further review, and may have been requested ↗ on your behalf by someone else. It doesn't affect how you edit; it is used only to manage the workload of new page patrollers ↗.

Since the articles you create will no longer be systematically reviewed by other editors, it is important that you maintain the high standard you have achieved so far in all your future creations. Please also try to remember to add relevant WikiProject ↗ templates, stub tags ↗, categories ↗, and incoming links ↗ to them, if you aren't already in the habit; user scripts such as Rater and StubSorter can help with this. As you have already shown that you have a strong grasp of Wikipedia's core content policies ↗, you might also consider volunteering to become a new page patroller ↗ yourself, helping to uphold the project's standards and encourage other good faith article writers.

Feel free to leave me a message if you have any questions. Happy editing! Chetsford (talk) 05:38, 20 April 2026 (UTC)

:Thank you so much! – '''zmbro''' (talk) (cont ↗) 14:22, 20 April 2026 (UTC)

On Lennon

First of all, congrats on the EOTW award! Secondly, I wanted to clarify regarding John Lennon ↗. His official website states in its search page, from verbatim, that it is the "Official website for artist, musician, poet, peace activist & philosopher John Lennon." My main thing regarding that was was that I would write it as his website would, as it technically is also ran and accepted by his family and the Lennon estate. I did ''not'' intend to stating that he was one, only that his website made it that he would be recognized as such. I don't know the logistics of it, but I feel like there is some weight via the website. Once again, not my words; blame the site!

Thank you. Be blessed. Frippinator (talk) 22:14, 20 April 2026 (UTC)

:{{u|Frippinator}} Hey there! Thanks for the kind words! Ah, I understand where you're coming from. I didn't see the summary when I looked at the page. I don't necessarily see how he could have been a philosopher. Yeah he wrote some philosophical lyrics, but was he Aristotle ↗? No. He was a songwriter. Then again, Bob Dylan ↗'s been compared to a poet for decades... Anyways, back to Lennon, since philosophy isn't really mentioned elsewhere throughout the article, I don't think it makes sense to include it in the opening sentence, even if his website says so. But maybe that's just me. Thanks for explaining! – '''zmbro''' (talk) (cont ↗) 02:12, 21 April 2026 (UTC)
::Now I will begin to ponder for the rest of my life whether John Lennon ''was'' Aristotle. Maybe I'll have to reinterpret Nicomachean Ethics ↗ as Nicobeatlean Ethics. I don't agree that he should be listed as a philosopher; I feel as though that he didn't really have any real credentials of philosophy besides his contemporary songwriting and lyrics. Intelligence and poetry does not equal philosophy; it's as steep a hole to become one as it is to relate to one. Thanks for the response! Frippinator (talk) 08:56, 21 April 2026 (UTC)

Promotion of List of songs recorded by Duran Duran ↗

{{ivmbox
|image = Cscr-featured.svg
|imagesize=60px
|extracss=font-size:1.25em; font-family:Georgia;
|text = Congratulations, Zmbro! The list you nominated, '''List of songs recorded by Duran Duran ↗''', has been promoted to featured status, recognizing it as one of the best lists on Wikipedia. The '''nomination discussion ↗''' has been archived.{{parabr}}This is a rare accomplishment and you should be proud. If you would like, you may nominate it ↗ to appear on the Main Page as Today's featured list. Keep up the great work! Cheers, {{user0|PresN}} via FACBot (talk) 23:25, 18 May 2026 (UTC)
}}

Modern Warfare II in Game Pass

If you look at the older Call of Duty games that went into Game Pass, they all got noted to go into Game Pass on their wiki pages. WW2, Modern Warfare 2019, Modern Warfare II, Black Ops 6 and 7. So i am just filling in what other people have done. RCPolygons (talk) 07:50, 23 May 2026 (UTC)

Update on the Metallica project

So a while ago, you proposed working on all of the Metallica album articles ↗. I figured I'd kind-of give an update on where I'm sitting on that.

I think I probably will take on ''Hardwired'' over the summer. I've gone back on a Hardwired kick lately and I'm interested in trying to work on the remaining articles for songs from that album (so Moth ↗, Atlas ↗ and NTWD ↗). Especially Moth. And might as well do something for the album article at that point. ''72 Seasons'' I feel a lot less inclined to work on but I'm sure you or I will get to it eventually.

Another Metallica project that I'm thinking about that I look more "forward" to trying though is creating more song articles. I've said it before but there are a ''lot'' of Metallica songs that I think are notable but don't have articles. I'm willing to bet that most songs from the main 5 albums are notable except for maybe a few off of ''Kill 'Em All'' or the Black Album (can't imagine anybody is writing extended commentary on "Motorbreath"). Otherwise though every song from RTL, MOP, and AJFA is probably notable. Load, Reload, and Death Magnetic also probably have potential for some extra songs themselves (Outlaw? Suicide & Redemption? Fixxxer?). And, obviously, improving existing song articles along the way. One of these days I'll swing through "One", "The Day That Never Comes", "All Nightmare Long", and "Fade to Black". '''λ''' '''Negative''''''MP1''' 17:00, 23 May 2026 (UTC)

:{{u|NegativeMP1}} Hey there! I apologize for the late reply, I've been on vacation this whole time. That sounds like a good plan! I still would like to redo the ''St. Anger'' article at some point (I just have to set aside a day to watch ''Some Kind of Monster'' and do some research). I'd also like to do ''Garage Inc. ↗'' too. Let me know if you need any assistance! I'd be happy to help :-) – '''zmbro''' (talk) (cont ↗) 18:19, 1 June 2026 (UTC)
::I don't know if I'd be able to help with either of those but I'd definitely be interested in trying to make song articles for those depending on what your research brings up. I strongly believe that their covers of "Whiskey in the Jar ↗" and "Turn the Page ↗" should be split out into standalone pages. And for ''St. Anger'', "All Within My Hands ↗" is a fascinating trainwreck that I almost made the article for but someone beat me to it. "Sweet Amber" is (for some reason) hailed as one of the better tracks on the album so maybe there's potential there as well. '''λ''' '''Negative''''''MP1''' 20:11, 1 June 2026 (UTC)

June 2026 GAN Backlog Drive

{| style="border: 5px solid #ABCDEF ; background-color: #FFF; padding:10px 15px 0; color: black"
|style="padding: 0; vertical-align: middle; height: 1.1em; font-size:130%" |'''Good article nominations ↗ |''' June 2026 Backlog Drive
|rowspan=3|right|75px ↗
|-
|'''June 2026 Backlog Drive:'''
Do you want to become more experienced in the GA process?

On 1 June, a one-month backlog drive for good article nominations will begin.

Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles reviewed.

Mentors are available, and new reviewers (<6 reviews) get bonus points!

Interested in taking part? You can '''sign up here ↗'''.
|-
|colspan=2|'''Other ways to participate:'''

Join the conversations on our talk page ↗.

|-
|colspan=2 style="font-size:85%; padding-top:15px;"|You're receiving this message because you have participated in a good article review this year or participated in the previous backlog drive.
|}

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:59, 25 May 2026 (UTC)

Your nomination of Be Sweet to Me ↗ is under review

Your good article nomination ↗ of the article Be Sweet to Me ↗ is 20px|alt=|link= ↗ '''under review'''. See '''Talk:Be Sweet to Me/GA1{{!}}the review page ↗''' for more information. This may take up to 7 days; feel free to contact the reviewer with any questions you might have.  Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Vestrian24Bio -- Vestrian24Bio (talk) 12:01, 7 June 2026 (UTC)

Talk:The Man Who Sold the World (song)/GA1

User:Gavetheman555 just nominated The Man Who Sold the World (song) ↗ for GAN. As you are the primary author, and the instructions say "if the nominator is neither the author of more than 10% of the article nor ranked in the top five by authorship, and there is no post on the article talk page, a reviewer may uncontroversially consider the GAN a drive-by nomination. A reviewer may notify the nominator on their talk page. Reviewers have the discretion to remove any drive-by nominations they come across." Let me know what you want me to do. Viriditas (talk) 02:54, 13 June 2026 (UTC)
:I am so sorry I didn't intend for this to happen, my intentions were not a drive by at all. It did seem like I was able to nominate it considering I made 41 current edits to the page, but I guess I somehow misunderstood something. I apologize. '''''Gavetheman555''' ''(talk) 11:21, 13 June 2026 (UTC)
::{{ping|Gavetheman555}} You can check out the statistics page.https://xtools.wmcloud.org/articleinfo/en.wikipedia.org/The_Man_Who_Sold_the_World_(song) ↗ You're right that in some unique circumstances, if your 41 edits were substantial, then yes, you could conceivably become a primary author. This has been known to happen. But in this case, most of your 41 edits were minor, IMO.https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=The_Man_Who_Sold_the_World_%28song%29&diff=1359031229&oldid=1357563297 ↗ If Zmbro feels differently, they will respond in kind. Viriditas (talk) 12:09, 13 June 2026 (UTC)
:::Thanks for bringing this up to me. In my humble opinion, the article needs some good copy editing before any kind of GAN nomination. I wasn't comfortable with nominating it before now for that reason, and I still feel the same way now. I fully believe {{u|Gavetheman555}} their actions were definitely not meant to be seen negatively (I've kept a close eye on all my expanded articles over the years and have come across a few poor ones from time to time). If I thought Gave made some poor choices I would ovule have said something. Anyways, if you'd like to co-nominate that's fine with me, but only after some major copy-editing is done :-) In its current state, I don't believe it's there yet. {{u|Viriditas}} – '''zmbro''' (talk) (cont ↗) 14:48, 13 June 2026 (UTC)

Your nomination of Be Sweet to Me ↗ has passed

Your good article nomination ↗ of the article Be Sweet to Me ↗ has 20px|alt=|link= ↗ '''passed'''; congratulations! See '''Talk:Be Sweet to Me/GA1{{!}}the review page ↗''' for more information. If the article is eligible to appear ↗ in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it ↗ within the next seven days. Please also consider reviewing ↗ somebody else's nomination to help keep the backlog down.  Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Vestrian24Bio -- Vestrian24Bio (talk) 10:21, 17 June 2026 (UTC)

FLC potential

Hey there! I'm planning to nominate List of songs recorded by My Chemical Romance ↗ for featured list status sometime really soon. Given I've never had a FL before, and Im aware you have a few in Artist lists, I wanted to see your opinion if you think its ready for nomination? I've done substantial work and followed other FL's (particually List of songs recorded by the Smiths ↗ and List of songs recorded by Joy Division ↗), overall I just wanted to make sure I have everything ready to go, thank you :) '''''Gavetheman555''' ''(talk) 20:40, 20 June 2026 (UTC)

:{{u|Gavetheman555}} Thanks for reaching out! Of course I can take a look! :-) – '''zmbro''' (talk) (cont ↗) 15:01, 21 June 2026 (UTC)
:::Thank you for your edits! I've nominated the list over at Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of songs recorded by My Chemical Romance/archive1 ↗ just incase if you want to leave comments :) '''''Gavetheman555''' ''(talk) 02:31 22 June 2026 (UTC)

New Paul McCartney and Wings article

Hey, just wanted to let you know that I just created an article for the title track from the album ''Wild Life''. Here's ↗ the link. Newtatoryd222 (talk) 00:16, 3 July 2026 (UTC)

:Are you gonna help improve the article or are you busy? Newtatoryd222 (talk) 17:12, 3 July 2026 (UTC)
::Hey there. It's July 4th weekend here in the states so I'll be a little busy this weekend. I can take a look when I'm available. What's the rush? lol – '''zmbro''' (talk) (cont ↗) 19:42, 3 July 2026 (UTC)
:::No rush, I was just wondering if you knew about it. Newtatoryd222 (talk) 19:47, 3 July 2026 (UTC)
::::Yep I saw your message. Just forgot to reply, sorry about that! – '''zmbro''' (talk) (cont ↗) 19:49, 3 July 2026 (UTC)
:::::I also just created an article for "Some People Never Know ↗". Newtatoryd222 (talk) 22:41, 4 July 2026 (UTC)
::::::{{u|Newtatoryd222}} Thanks for creating these articles! It's honestly about time ''Wild Life'' got some appreciation. "Bip Bop" has been a massive guilty-pleasure song for me ever since it appeared on ''Pure McCartney ↗''. – '''zmbro''' (talk) (cont ↗) 16:50, 5 July 2026 (UTC)

Your nomination of Wild Life (Wings album) ↗ is under review

Your good article nomination ↗ of the article Wild Life (Wings album) ↗ is 20px|alt=|link= ↗ '''under review'''. See '''Talk:Wild Life (Wings album)/GA1{{!}}the review page ↗''' for more information. This may take up to 7 days; feel free to contact the reviewer with any questions you might have.  Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of DannyRogers800 -- DannyRogers800 (talk) 15:47, 3 July 2026 (UTC)

DYK for Be Sweet to Me

{{ivmbox
|image = Updated DYK query.svg
|imagesize=40px
|image class=skin-invert
|text = On 5 July 2026 ↗, '''Did you know ↗''' was updated with a fact from the article '''''Be Sweet to Me ↗''''', which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ''... that the title of Violet Grohl ↗'s debut album '''''Be Sweet to Me ↗''''' began as an in-joke between her and her best friend?'' The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Be Sweet to Me ↗. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (Be Sweet to Me ↗), and the hook may be added to the statistics page ↗ after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to nominate it ↗.
}} Cielquiparle (talk) 00:03, 5 July 2026 (UTC)

TFL notification for July 2026

Hi, Zmbro. I'm just posting to let you know that List of songs recorded by Duran Duran ↗ – a list that you have been heavily involved with – has been chosen to appear on the Main Page as Today's featured list ↗ for July 27. The TFL blurb can be seen here ↗. If you have any thoughts on the selection, please post them on my talk page or at TFL talk ↗. Regards, Giants2008 (Talk) 00:29, 5 July 2026 (UTC)

Simplicity

Discogs is just as reliable as wikipedia. They have this image there. Is that enough? https://i.discogs.com/wG5aYj1Eu-UkfX0J0vMJo_rBvUZSA7wd8tQ3wLjFg10/rs:fit/g:sm/q:90/h:596/w:600/czM6Ly9kaXNjb2dz/LWRhdGFiYXNlLWlt/YWdlcy9SLTE4MjQ2/MDA0LTE2MTgyNDk3/ODUtMzM4NC5qcGVn.jpeg AMCKen (talk) 19:35, 9 July 2026 (UTC)

:I don't think you understand why you're being reverted. Discogs is a user-generated site, which is considered unreliable per WP:NOTRSMUSIC ↗. When it comes to song covers, simply existing does not mean it's notable ↗. A simple image that establishes the existence of something doesn't warrant notability (in this context). Per WP:SONGCOVER ↗, {{xt|Only cover versions/renditions important enough to have gained attention in their own right should be added to song articles.}} If Curry's version was notable (i.e. charted really well, had secondary commentary ↗ on it, etc.), it could warrant a sentence. But a simple Google search of his cover only finds lyrics and streaming sites, so it is not notable. That can change in the future, but as of right now, his cover is not notable enough per WP guidelines. I hope this helps. – '''zmbro''' (talk) (cont ↗) 20:45, 9 July 2026 (UTC)
::{{tps}} Yes, Discogs is just as reliable as Wikipedia, and Wikipedia is not reliable at all (being also user-generated). Bishonen | tålk 21:17, 9 July 2026 (UTC).
:::{{u|Bishonen}} I mean, it's gotten better as of lately ↗. – '''zmbro''' (talk) (cont ↗) 14:00, 10 July 2026 (UTC)