User Talk: Grieg2

Server-side rendered snapshot of this editor's Wikipedia talk page discussions.

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Grieg2. Thank you for your work on Nederlandsche Suikerraffinaderij ↗. User:Onel5969, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process ↗, had the following comments:

{{Bq|1=Very nice job on this article. Keep up the good work!}}

'''Onel5969''' TT me 16:26, 6 January 2023 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Grieg2. Thank you for your work on Kriegswaffenkontrollgesetz ↗. User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process ↗, had the following comments:

{{Bq|1=Thank you for creating the article! Hopefully you will write more, have a blessed day!}}

&maltese; SunDawn &maltese; (contact) 08:01, 28 January 2023 (UTC)

Beet sugar factory ↗ moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Beet sugar factory ↗, is not suitable as written to remain published. It is too closely worded and structured to another article, Sugar beet ↗. I've moved your draft to draftspace ↗ (with a prefix of "<code>Draft:</code>" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline ↗ and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Mattdaviesfsic (talk) 16:42, 19 February 2023 (UTC)

:Indeed, the article intentionally consists of sections from the sugar beet page with updates and fixes on the references. The idea is to remove the sections about sugar processing and the history of the sugar beet industry to a separate page called beet sugar factory. (Just like there are separate pages for sugar cane and the cane sugar processing.) As soon as the review is complete, I will replace these sections on the sugar beet page with small paragraphs and a link to the beet sugar factory page, fixing this issue. Grieg2 (talk) 17:00, 19 February 2023 (UTC)

Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution

25px|alt=Information icon ↗ Thank you for your contributions ↗ to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from one or more pages into :Beet sugar factory ↗. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing ↗ does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary ↗ at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking ↗ to the copied page, e.g., <code>copied content from <nowiki>page name ↗</nowiki>; see that page's history for attribution</code>. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{tl|copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia ↗. Thank you.  DanCherek (talk) 12:44, 29 April 2023 (UTC)

:Thank you for your comment. I added the applicable templates to the beet sugar factory talk page.Grieg2 (talk) 16:28, 29 April 2023 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Grieg2. Thank you for your work on Dordrecht Sugar Factory ↗. User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process ↗, I had the following comments:

{{Bq|1=Hey there! Hope you're having a great day. Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia with your article. I'm happy to inform you that your article has adhered to Wikipedia's policies, so I've marked it as reviewed. Have a fantastic day for you and your family!}}

&maltese; SunDawn &maltese; (contact) 05:11, 25 July 2023 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Grieg2. Thank you for your work on 21 cm RK L/19 ↗. User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process ↗, had the following comments:

{{Bq|1=Hey there! Hope you're having a great day. Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia with your article. I'm happy to inform you that your article has adhered to Wikipedia's policies, so I've marked it as reviewed. Have a fantastic day for you and your family!}}

&maltese; SunDawn &maltese; (contact) 21:43, 10 September 2023 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Grieg2. Thank you for your work on 17 cm RK L/25 ↗. User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process ↗, had the following comments:

{{Bq|1=Thank you for writing the article on Wikipedia! I genuinely appreciate your efforts in creating the article on Wikipedia and expanding the sum of human knowledge in Wikipedia. Wishing you and your family a great day!}}

&maltese; SunDawn &maltese; (contact) 05:18, 13 October 2023 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Grieg2. Thank you for your work on 21 cm RK L/22 ↗. User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process ↗, had the following comments:

{{Bq|1=Thank you for writing the article on Wikipedia! I genuinely appreciate your efforts in creating the article on Wikipedia and expanding the sum of human knowledge in Wikipedia. Wishing you and your family a great day!}}

&maltese; SunDawn &maltese; (contact) 05:19, 13 October 2023 (UTC)

21 cm RK L/19

thumb|21 cm RK L/22 calculations ↗
Hello Grieg2,

Thank you for the useful articles on different guns. Useful for me who does not know much about old or new gun machines.

The reason for contacting you is to have some help identifying some old field guns in my town.
For example this gun ↗ or this one ↗ or this one ↗ or this one ↗. There are some more which I try to identify and would like your help if you can and know.

Best wishes
Nikos D. Karabelas

Actia Nicopolis (talk) 18:01, 27 January 2024 (UTC)

:Hi Actia Nicopolis,
:The color postcard is a bit vague. On the other three images, the upper part of the carriage, i.e. the vertical part below the trunnions, shows that these all depict a gun on what is roughly the same type of carriage. One can count the number of rivet ↗s on the muzzle side. There are 11 in the first column which does not reach the bottom, and 11 in the second column which does not reach to the top. This applies to all three of the carriages.
:I identify the carriage as a German 21 cm RK coastal gun carriage. We can deduce this from an image of the 1873 Vienna exhibition, shown on the 21 cm RK L/22 ↗ page. The pattern of the rivets of the 21 cm RK L/22 Vienna photograph matches that of your three images. Based on the overall appearance of the guns and carriage, and an image supplied by the Dutch captain Mazel, I say that the three images depict a Krupp 21 cm Ring Kanone.
:However, the unclear number of rivets on the Vienna photograph does not seem to match the number of rivets on your three images. The explanation for this would be that as the Dutch captain Mazel mentioned, the 21 cm RK L/22 at the Vienna exhibition was on a carriage which had the trunnions at a height of 2.015 m. This identifies the Vienna carriage as the early c/69 carriage. So, the images you linked are probably on a different coastal carriage. This could be the even somewhat lower c/70 carriage, or the higher c/73 carriage. It anyway explains the likely difference in the number of rivets.
:I will first update the carriage identification on the 21 cm RK L/22, and upload or link Mazel's picture of the 21 cm RK L/22 on that carriage, with proper references. I will then proceed with the identification. Grieg2 (talk) 18:17, 30 January 2024 (UTC)
::I finished the identification of the gun as a 21 cm RK L/22 ↗ by doing some calculations to check whether it all makes sense. These are in the image I added to this discussion. Grieg2 (talk) 11:49, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
:::Hello Grieg2,
:::Could you help me identify the gun on the right of this photo?
:::thumb|left ↗
::: 
:::Actia Nicopolis (talk) 14:20, 18 October 2024 (UTC)
::::@Actia Nicopolis The picture is a bit vague. I would really have to get into this, if it is possible. I will keep it in mind for after I finish some other ideas. Grieg2 (talk) 14:42, 28 October 2024 (UTC)
:::::@Grieg2 Many thanks Actia Nicopolis (talk) 18:15, 28 October 2024 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Grieg2. Thank you for your work on Fort Harssens ↗. SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process ↗, had the following comments:

{{Bq|1=Good day! Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia by writing this article. I have marked the article as reviewed. Have a wonderful and blessed day for you and your family!}}

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{code|<nowiki>{{Re|</nowiki>SunDawn<nowiki>}}</nowiki>}}. Please remember to sign your reply with {{code|<nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation ↗ tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

&maltese; SunDawn &maltese; (contact) 03:28, 23 March 2024 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Grieg2. Thank you for your work on 30.5 cm MRK L/35 ↗. SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process ↗, had the following comments:

{{Bq|1=Good day! Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia by writing this article. I have marked the article as reviewed. Have a wonderful and blessed day for you and your family!}}

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{code|<nowiki>{{Re|</nowiki>SunDawn<nowiki>}}</nowiki>}}. Please remember to sign your reply with {{code|<nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation ↗ tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

&maltese; SunDawn &maltese; (contact) 16:19, 6 April 2024 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Grieg2. Thank you for your work on 26 cm RK L/22 ↗. SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process ↗, had the following comments:

{{Bq|1=Good day! Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia by writing this article. I have marked the article as reviewed. Have a wonderful and blessed day for you and your family!}}

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{code|<nowiki>{{Re|</nowiki>SunDawn<nowiki>}}</nowiki>}}. Please remember to sign your reply with {{code|<nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation ↗ tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

&maltese; SunDawn &maltese; (contact) 02:39, 16 April 2024 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi Grieg2. Thank you for your work on 26 cm RK L/20 ↗. Another editor, SunDawn, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol ↗ and left the following comment:

{{Bq|1=Good day! Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia by writing this article. I have marked the article as reviewed. Have a wonderful and blessed day for you and your family!}}

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{code|<nowiki>{{Re|</nowiki>SunDawn<nowiki>}}</nowiki>}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation ↗ tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

&maltese; SunDawn &maltese; (contact) 10:23, 3 May 2024 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi Grieg2. Thank you for your work on 35.5 cm MRK L/22.5 ↗. Another editor, Aszx5000, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol ↗ and left the following comment:

{{Bq|1=Very nice article; you should be autopatrolled!}}

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{code|<nowiki>{{Re|</nowiki>Aszx5000<nowiki>}}</nowiki>}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation ↗ tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Aszx5000 (talk) 20:24, 4 June 2024 (UTC)

:{{Re|Aszx5000}} Thank you! I took me some time to realize what Wikipedia:Autopatrolled ↗ means.😀 Grieg2 (talk) 15:49, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
::I think you are definitely at that level. Aszx5000 (talk) 16:36, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
:You are doing a great job with your Krupp gun articles, but could you please add categorization by caliber to them? I. e. :Category:356 mm artillery ↗.5.178.188.143 ↗ (talk) 08:42, 16 July 2024 (UTC)

Invitation to participate in a research

Hello,

The Wikimedia Foundation is conducting a survey of Wikipedians to better understand what draws administrators to contribute to Wikipedia, and what affects administrator retention. We will use this research to improve experiences for Wikipedians, and address common problems and needs. We have identified you as a good candidate for this research, and would greatly appreciate your participation in this '''anonymous survey ↗'''.

You do not have to be an Administrator to participate.

The survey should take around 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its Meta page ↗ and view its privacy statement ↗ .

Please find our contact on the project Meta page if you have any questions or concerns.

Kind Regards,

WMF Research Team ↗

<bdi lang="en" dir="ltr">BGerdemann (WMF) (talk) 19:27, 23 October 2024 (UTC) </bdi>

Reminder to participate in Wikipedia research

Hello,

I recently invited you to take a survey about administration on Wikipedia. If you haven’t yet had a chance, there is still time to participate– we’d truly appreciate your feedback. The survey is anonymous and should take about 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its Meta page ↗ and view its privacy statement ↗.

Take the survey '''here ↗'''.

Kind Regards,

WMF Research Team ↗

<bdi lang="en" dir="ltr">BGerdemann (WMF) (talk) 00:41, 13 November 2024 (UTC) </bdi>

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

<div class="ivmbox " style="margin-bottom: 1em; border: 1px solid #a2a9b1; background-color: #fdf2d5; padding: 0.5em; display: flex; align-items: center; ">
<div class="ivmbox-image noresize" style="padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em;">40px ↗</div>
<div class="ivmbox-text">
Hello! Voting in the '''2024 Arbitration Committee elections ↗''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2024|end}}-1 day}}. All '''eligible users ↗''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee ↗ is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process ↗. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans ↗, topic bans ↗, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy ↗ describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates ↗ and submit your choices on the '''2024|poll}}|voting page ↗'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:13, 19 November 2024 (UTC)

</div>
</div>

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi Grieg2. Thank you for your work on Canon de 27 C modèle 1864 ↗. Another editor, SunDawn, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol ↗ and left the following comment:

{{Bq|1=Thank you for writing the article! Have a blessed weekend for you and your family!}}

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{code|<nowiki>{{Re|</nowiki>SunDawn<nowiki>}}</nowiki>}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation ↗ tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

&maltese; SunDawn &maltese; (contact) 15:21, 19 January 2025 (UTC)

Ways to improve Ruelle Foundry

Hello, Grieg2,

Thank you for creating Ruelle Foundry ↗.

I have tagged the page ↗ as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process ↗ and note that:

{{Quote|1=Thank you for your translation of the Ruelle Foundry ↗ article. I noticed the translation is a little rough in places (for example: "At the time, the production of ammunition, was also very important" is an example of comma splicing.) If English is not your first language, no worries, feel free to ask the kind folk over at Wikipedia:WikiProject Guild of Copy Editors ↗ to clean up the language. I believe, however, the article passes notability and can remain on the site.}}

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with <code><nowiki>{{Re|</nowiki>1TWO3Writer<nowiki>}}</nowiki></code>. Remember to sign your reply with <code><nowiki>~~~~</nowiki></code>. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse ↗.

Delivered via the Page Curation ↗ tool, on behalf of the reviewer. 

123Writer talk 02:15, 25 January 2025 (UTC)

Hi {{Re|1TWO3Writer}} you certainly had a point. The page was and is rather unbalanced. I addressed the too many headers issue. Indeed French and English are not my first language. This made it challenging to translate the often very technical content of the referenced works. I did not translate much of the French page, because I could not check its references. Anyway, after making some improvements, I requested assitance at the Wikipedia:WikiProject Guild of Copy Editors ↗.Grieg2 (talk) 14:57, 9 February 2025 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi Grieg2. Thank you for your work on Prinses Margriet Canal ↗. Another editor, JBchrch, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol ↗ and left the following comment:

{{Bq|1=Many thanks for the article! Just one point: the Harv ref "De Heerenveensche koerier 26 June 1946" appears to not point to any references.}}

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{code|<nowiki>{{Re|</nowiki>JBchrch<nowiki>}}</nowiki>}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation ↗ tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

'''JBchrch''' talk ↗ 13:21, 23 August 2025 (UTC)

:{{Re|JBchrch}} Thanks, the reference was indeed missing. I added it just now Grieg2 (talk) 14:59, 23 August 2025 (UTC)
::Thanks a lot! By the way if you want to spot issues of that kind User:Trappist the monk/HarvErrors is very useful. '''JBchrch''' talk ↗ 16:46, 23 August 2025 (UTC)

ArbCom 2025 Elections voter message

<div class="ivmbox " style="margin-bottom: 1em; border: 1px solid #a2a9b1; background-color: #fdf2d5; padding: 0.5em; display: flex; align-items: center; ">
<div class="ivmbox-image" style="padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em;flex-basis: 40px">40px ↗</div>
<div class="ivmbox-text">
Hello! Voting in the '''2025 Arbitration Committee elections ↗''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2025|end}}-1 day}}. All '''eligible users ↗''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee ↗ is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process ↗. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans ↗, topic bans ↗, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy ↗ describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please review the candidates ↗ and submit your choices on the '''2025|poll}}|voting page ↗'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:30, 18 November 2025 (UTC)

</div>
</div>

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi Grieg2. Thank you for your work on MS Moldanger (1932) ↗. Another editor, Scope creep, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol ↗ and left the following comment:

{{Bq|1=Ref 17 doesn't have any bib entry and it looks like a lot of the author information is missing from the references section.}}

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{code|<nowiki>{{Re|</nowiki>Scope creep<nowiki>}}</nowiki>}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation ↗ tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

'''scope_creepTalk''' 11:42, 29 December 2025 (UTC)

:{{Re|Scope creep}} Thank you, the bib entry was indeed missing. I added it just now.Grieg2 (talk) 15:40, 29 December 2025 (UTC)

Koopvaarders Lock ↗

Hello, I saw that you started this article. The lock has been renovated for the past three years and was opened again today. As you are more familiar with the subject can I ask you to update the article? I'm planning on writing an article about the lock for the Dutch Wikipedia (or translate (parts of) this English article). Larshei (talk) 14:40, 15 April 2026 (UTC)

:Hi Larshei, nice to hear about the renovation, which is interesting from the engineering point of view. Remind me if I forget to update the article.
:It would be good to have a Dutch version of the page.Grieg2 (talk) 06:02, 16 April 2026 (UTC)
::Done Grieg2 (talk) 18:55, 24 April 2026 (UTC)
:::Thanks! Larshei (talk) 10:09, 22 May 2026 (UTC)