W
Active Editors
Back to Profile

User Talk: Igordebraga

Server-side rendered snapshot of this editor's Wikipedia talk page discussions.

{{top icon
| imagename = Original Barnstar.png
| wikilink = User:Igordebraga/Barnstars
| description = For your tireless work in bringing Metroid Prime ↗ to FA status. And even though I nominated it, you get 99% of the FA star! Congratulations! Judgesurreal777 01:56, 26 February 2008 (UTC)
| sortkey = 1}}
{{top icon
| imagename = Team Barnstar Hires.png
| wikilink = User:Igordebraga/Barnstars
| description = Fantastic work (again) on ''Goldfinger'': we're now GA listed again! Thanks very much for all your hard work and invaluable input, without which we would not have got anywhere near GA! Schrodinger's cat is alive ^ @ 12:57, 29 July 2011 (UTC)
| sortkey = 2}}
{{top icon
| imagename = Tireless Contributor Barnstar Hires.gif
| wikilink = User:Igordebraga/Barnstars
| description = Igor - for the third time, thanks again for all your help, this time with ''On Her Majesty's Secret Service'' ↗, which is now a GA-listed article again. Without your hard work and invaluable input we wouldn't have made it. Thanks again - and on to ''MWTGG''! Gavin Schrodinger's cat is alive ^ @ 21:15, 14 August 2011 (UTC)
| sortkey = 3}}
{{top icon
| imagename = Tireless Contributor Barnstar Hires.gif
| wikilink = User:Igordebraga/Barnstars
| description = Igor - for the third time, thanks again for all your help, this time with ''On Her Majesty's Secret Service'' ↗, which is now a GA-listed article again. Without your hard work and invaluable input we wouldn't have made it. Thanks again - and on to ''MWTGG''! Gavin Schrodinger's cat is alive ^ @ 21:15, 14 August 2011 (UTC)
| sortkey = 4}}
{{top icon
| imagename = Tireless Contributor Barnstar Hires.gif
| wikilink = User:Igordebraga/Barnstars
| description = Here's to you, Igor! For aiding me through the storm of a reassessment! The next (or two) review(s) by Tbhotch will be the final before the reassessment ends! Be sure to help aid me for the article! Fanaction2031 07:25, 19 August 2011 (UTC)
| sortkey = 5}}
{{top icon
| imagename = Team Barnstar Hires.png
| wikilink = User:Igordebraga/Barnstars
| description = Once again, User: Igordebraga, thanks for all your work on ''The Man with the Golden Gun'': this article would not have got to GA Status without all your efforts. Schrodinger's cat is alive ^ @ 21:15, 14 August 2011 (UTC)
| sortkey = 6}}
{{top icon
| imagename = Team Barnstar Hires.png
| wikilink = User:Igordebraga/Barnstars
| description = Once again, User: Igordebraga, thanks for all your work on ''The Man with the Golden Gun'': this article would not have got to GA Status without all your efforts. Schrodinger's cat is alive ^ @ 21:15, 14 August 2011 (UTC)
| sortkey = 7}}
{{top icon
| imagename = Team Barnstar Hires.png
| wikilink = User:Igordebraga/Barnstars
| description = Once again a thousand thanks for all your input on the ''FYEO'' article - a great three person team we have going here! Only ''LTK'' (now a GAN) and ''NSNA'' to go for the full house! Thanks again.... SchroCat ^ @ 08:17, 31 August 2011 (UTC)
| sortkey = 8}}
{{top icon
| imagename = Star with eyes.svg
| wikilink = User:Igordebraga/Barnstars
| description = For your work on Wario, and helping get it to GA status! Thank you very much! Nathan2055 00:41, 5 September 2011 (UTC)
| sortkey = 9}}
{{top icon
| imagename = Team Barnstar Hires.png
| wikilink = User:Igordebraga/Barnstars
| description = Thanks again for all your hard work on ''Never Say Never Again'' to get it over the line for GA status! As always it's been great working with you again. I'm going to see what I can do for ''Casino Royale'' (Climax!) ↗, but I'm not sure there is enough information out there to get it to GA status, but I think we have to try! SchroCat ^ @ 15:35, 21 September 2011 (UTC)
| sortkey = 10}}
{{top icon
| imagename = Special Barnstar Hires.png
| wikilink = User:Igordebraga/Barnstars
| description = Fantastic news on the Bond Good Topics—here's hoping to the same on the novels, once the list goes through FLN procedure! SchroCat ^ @ 08:37, 25 January 2012 (UTC)
| sortkey = 11}}
{{top icon
| imagename = GA barnstar.png
| wikilink = User:Igordebraga/Barnstars
| description = Thanks Igordebraga for helping to promote Only Happy When It Rains to Good Article status. Please accept this little sign of appreciation and goodwill from me, because you deserve it. Keep it up, and give someone a pat on the back today. -- Sp33dyphil 01:11, 29 January 2012 (UTC)
| sortkey = 12}}
{{top icon
| imagename = GA barnstar.png
| wikilink = User:Igordebraga/Barnstars
| description = For your significant contributions that helped promote ''X-Men: First Class'' to good article status. Jhenderson777 19:30, 1 July 2012 (UTC)
| sortkey = 13}}
{{top icon
| imagename = GA barnstar.png
| wikilink = User:Igordebraga/Barnstars
| description = For your contributions in getting Synchrony (''The X-Files'') to Good Article status. -- Khazar2 23:27, 31 December 2012 (UTC)
| sortkey = 14}}
{{top icon
| imagename = GA barnstar.png
| wikilink = User:Igordebraga/Barnstars
|description=For your contributions to bring ''Crimewave'' to Good Article status. Thanks, and keep up the good work! -- Khazar2 12:52, 15 February 2013 (UTC)
| sortkey = 15}}
{{top icon
| imagename = million_award_logo.svg
| wikilink = User:Igordebraga/Barnstars
|description=For your contributions to bring ''Jaws (film)'' (estimated annual readership: 1,146,000) to Featured Article status, I hereby present you the Million Award. Congratulations on this rare accomplishment, and thanks for all you do for Wikipedia's readers. -- Khazar2 13:20, 28 August 2013 (UTC)
| sortkey = 16}}
{{top icon
| imagename = million_award_logo.svg
| wikilink = User:Igordebraga/Barnstars
|description=For your contributions to bring ''Inception'' (estimated annual readership: 2,096,000) to Good Article status, I hereby present you the Million Award. Congratulations on this rare accomplishment, and thanks for all you do for Wikipedia's readers. --Khazar2 15:23, 9 September 2013
| sortkey = 17}}
{{top icon
| imagename = Team Barnstar Hires.png
| wikilink = User:Igordebraga/Barnstars
|description=Thanks for your improvements to ''G.I. Joe: Retaliation'', and helping get it to GA status! Fortdj33 23:37, 30 September 2013 (UTC)
| sortkey = 18}}
{{top icon
| imagename = million_award_logo.svg
| wikilink = User:Igordebraga/Barnstars
|description=For your contributions to bring The Lion King (estimated annual readership: 1,689,248) to Good Article status, I hereby present you the Million Award. Congratulations on this rare accomplishment, and thanks for all you do for Wikipedia's readers! -- Bobnorwal 23:41, 15 April 2014 (UTC)
| sortkey = 21}}
{{top icon
| imagename = Editors Barnstar Hires.png
| wikilink = User:Igordebraga/Barnstars
|description=For making ''X-Men: The Last Stand'' a GA! Kailash29792 05:20, 10 October 2014 (UTC)
| sortkey = 22}}
{{top icon
| imagename = Cornflower blue Yogo sapphire.jpg
| wikilink = User:Igordebraga/Barnstars
|description='''quality over quantity''' Thank you, user from Brazil, for your contributions to quality articles on games, film and music, such as Metroid Prime 2: Echoes, Inception and The Lion King, for featured topics, list and reviews, for "quality over quantity", - you are an awesome Wikipedian! --Gerda Arendt 10:17, 15 November 2014 (UTC)
| sortkey = 23}}
{{top icon
| imagename = Working Wikimedian's Barnstar Hires.png
| wikilink = User:Igordebraga/Barnstars
|description= As someone who knows how exhausting the Top 25 Report ↗ can be, I feel you deserve a barnstar for posting it three weeks in a row :-) Serendipodous 06:28, 20 June 2018
| sortkey = 24}}
{{top icon
| imagename = Working Wikimedian's Barnstar Hires.png
| wikilink = User:Igordebraga/Barnstars
|description= his barnstar is awarded for your remarkable and tireless work on the Top 25 Report, and its annual version. Without you, the entire enterprise would have failed; and so, this barnstar denotes your diligent and driven work as the leading force behind the Top 25 Report. Kudos, Stormy clouds 14:01, 6 January 2019
| sortkey = 25}}
{{top icon
| imagename = Signpost_Barnstar_Hires.png
| wikilink = User:Igordebraga/Barnstars
|description= For an outstanding article in the March 2020 issue. Smallbones 00:18, 2 April 2020 (UTC)
| sortkey = 26}}
{{top icon
| imagename = Working Wikimedian's Barnstar Hires.png
| wikilink = User:Igordebraga/Barnstars
|description= I still read the Top 25 even though I don't have time to contribute, and I always mean to commend you on still tirelessly compiling it, as well as creating new functions to check statistics. So here's a tribute to that work! Kingsif 09:22, 8 January 2025 (UTC)
| sortkey = 27}}
{{top icon
| imagename = Working Wikimedian's Barnstar Hires.png
| wikilink = User:Igordebraga/Barnstars
|description=For getting the Top 50 report finally done, despite obvious frustration, I award you this small token. Serendipodous 5 February 2026 (UTC)
| sortkey = 28}}
{{top icon
| imagename = Signpost_Barnstar_Hires.png
| wikilink = User:Igordebraga/Barnstars
|description= For helping to write an interesting and useful Traffic report (vol. 22 issue 4 and always). Bri 05:03, 10 March 2026 (UTC)
| sortkey = 29}}
Archive 1 (May 2005-August 2009)<br/>
Archive 2 (September 2009-March 2011)<br/>
Archive 3 (March 2011-January 2012)<br/>
Archive 4 (February 2012-December 2012)<br/>
Archive 5 (January 2013-December 2014)<br>
Archive 6 (January 2014-December 2019)<br>
Archive 7 (January-December 2020)
Archive 8 (January 2021-December 2024)


A barnstar for you!


{| class="barnstar" style="border:1px solid gray; background:#fdffe7;"
|-
|rowspan="2" style="padding-right:5px;" | 100px ↗

|style="font-size:1.65em; padding:0; height: 1.1em;" | <strong>The Working Wikipedian's Barnstar</strong>
|-
|style="border-top: 1px solid gray;" | I still read the Top 25 even though I don't have time to contribute, and I always mean to commend you on still tirelessly compiling it, as well as creating new functions to check statistics. So here's a tribute to that work! Kingsif (talk) 09:22, 8 January 2025 (UTC)
|}

Top 25 Report



Hi, Igordebraga!
I want to join the commentary and take over the reports on Royal Rumble (2025) ↗, is there any request to join or just adding my name to the commentary? <span style="border-radius:7px;background:#800080;padding:4px 6px 4px 6px;color:white;"><span style="color:white;">ROY is WAR</span></span> '''''Talk!''''' 02:18, 3 February 2025 (UTC)

:Just write and add your name to the byline above. Any input is welcome. igordebraga ≠ ↗ 02:25, 3 February 2025 (UTC)

Congratulations, you are now famous



https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L7LhngzE10I&t=11s Polygnotus (talk) 04:49, 3 February 2025 (UTC)


Deaths in 2025 in Top 25?



Is the description for the Deaths in 2025 ↗ always a quote from a person who's also on the top 25? I've noticed that the most recent few have followed that pattern. WFUM🔥🌪️ (talk) 16:10, 22 April 2025 (UTC)

:Not always. Given the death list is on every week with few exceptions, straight entries get repetitive, so I started putting song lyrics about death (or ones taken out of context to seem like it). The others caught on, though at times putting quotes instead of lyrics. And if the list has something to reference in the death list entry, it's all the easier to write! igordebraga ≠ ↗ 16:36, 22 April 2025 (UTC)
:But in any case, {{ping|Wildfireupdateman}}, there's no problem with straighter entries like the one you did, I only changed because I had already set a song lyric and lost it during the edit conflict. After all, every contribution to the Report is welcome. igordebraga ≠ ↗ 16:53, 22 April 2025 (UTC)
::Thanks for the tips! I'm planning on contributing more to the report; it seems interesting. WFUM🔥🌪️ (talk) 17:05, 22 April 2025 (UTC)


Jaws (film) ↗



This is to let you know that the above article has been scheduled as today's featured article ↗ for 20 June 2025. Please check that the article needs no amendments. Feel free to amend the draft blurb, which can be found at Wikipedia:Today's featured article/June 2025 ↗, or to make comments on other matters concerning the scheduling of this article at Wikipedia talk:Today's featured article/June 2025 ↗. Please keep an eye on that page, as comments regarding the draft blurb may be left there. I also suggest that you watchlist Wikipedia:Main Page/Errors ↗ from two days before the article appears on the Main Page. Thanks and congratulations on your work! Wehwalt (talk) 11:32, 1 May 2025 (UTC)

TFA



Thank you today for the 2007 article Kingdom Hearts: Chain of Memories ↗! -- Gerda Arendt (talk) 09:58, 5 May 2025 (UTC)
{{User QAIbox
| image = Foxglove, Scheid, Ehrenbach.jpg
| image_upright = 0.8
| bold = story · music · places
}}
... and today for the timely appearance of Jaws (film) ↗, introduced (in 2012): "Like Martin Brody, my ship was sunken by an adversary willing to chew on me, and I'm taking shots at it. Lame jokes aside, I had already rewritten this Former Featured Article hoping to return its bronze star, and then during the last FAC User:DocKino joined and did a much-welcome copyedit. Now that my two weeks of waiting are done, I just want to see if I'm gonna need a bigger boat,"! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:10, 20 June 2025 (UTC)

Great minds think ... and do? alike



It looks like we added the same content one minute apart https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Wikipedia_Signpost/Next_issue/Traffic_report&diff=prev&oldid=1313508382 ↗https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Wikipedia_Signpost/Next_issue/Traffic_report&diff=prev&oldid=1313508461 ↗ from one another. ☆ <span style="white-space:nowrap;font-family: Papyrus">Bri</span> (talk) 20:38, 26 September 2025 (UTC)

:@Bri True. Only when I returned to edit something I noticed the duplicate. Now if only the bot that updates the most edited list resumed working so I'd add that as well... igordebraga ≠ ↗ 05:19, 27 September 2025 (UTC)

Signpost issue almost ready



Didn't know if you watch the ''Signpost'' newsroom ↗, but there's a couple of hours left until publication if you want to try to squeeze in Wikipedia:Top 25 Report/September 21 to 27, 2025 ↗. ☆ <span style="white-space:nowrap;font-family: Papyrus">Bri</span> (talk) 03:16, 2 October 2025 (UTC)

A cupcake for you!



{| style="background-color: var(--background-color-success-subtle, #fdffe7); border: 1px solid var(--border-color-success, #fceb92); color: var(--color-base, #202122);"
|style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 5px;" | 120px ↗
|style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;" | Thank you for your support in promoting ''Batman Returns ↗'' to Featured Article status. Darkwarriorblake (talk) 22:53, 4 November 2025 (UTC)
|}

Thanks



The quote you pulled for Patricia Routledge ↗ at Traffic report draft ↗ was not familiar to me; it really hit home ↗ when I read it. ☆ <span style="white-space:nowrap;font-family: Papyrus">Bri</span> (talk) 00:28, 6 November 2025 (UTC)

Your nomination of Game of Thrones season 1 ↗ is under review



Your good article nomination ↗ of the article Game of Thrones season 1 ↗ is <span class="nowrap">20px|alt=|link= ↗ </span>'''under review'''. See Talk:Game of Thrones season 1/GA1{{!}}the review page ↗ for more information. This may take up to 7 days; feel free to contact the reviewer with any questions you might have.<!-- Template:GANotice default --> <!-- Template:GANotice --> <small>Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Bgsu98</small> -- Bgsu98 (talk) 00:06, 9 November 2025 (UTC)

Your nomination of Game of Thrones season 1 ↗ has passed



Your good article nomination ↗ of the article Game of Thrones season 1 ↗ has <span class="nowrap">20px|alt=|link= ↗ </span>'''passed'''; congratulations! See Talk:Game of Thrones season 1/GA1{{!}}the review page ↗ for more information. If the article is eligible to appear ↗ in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it ↗ within the next seven days.<!-- Template:GANotice |result=pass --> <!-- Template:GANotice --> <small>Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Bgsu98</small> -- Bgsu98 (talk) 21:04, 17 November 2025 (UTC)

:If you ever decide to send this article to FAC, let me know. It is very well done. The only reason it was delisted from FL was because a decision had been made somewhere that those season articles no longer qualified as FLs; there was nothing wrong with the article. I believe the improvements we made were valuable. I would happily support this if you choose to pursue FA. <span style="color:darkorange;">'''Bgsu98'''</span> <span style="color:darkorange;">(Talk)</span> 01:47, 18 November 2025 (UTC)

ArbCom 2025 Elections voter message



<div class="ivmbox " style="margin-bottom: 1em; border: 1px solid #a2a9b1; background-color: #fdf2d5; padding: 0.5em; display: flex; align-items: center; ">
<div class="ivmbox-image" style="padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em;flex-basis: 40px">40px ↗</div>
<div class="ivmbox-text">
Hello! Voting in the '''2025 Arbitration Committee elections ↗''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2025|end}}-1 day}}. All '''eligible users ↗''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee ↗ is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process ↗. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans ↗, topic bans ↗, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy ↗ describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please review the candidates ↗ and submit your choices on the '''2025|poll}}|voting page ↗'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. <small>MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:21, 18 November 2025 (UTC)</small>

</div>
</div>
<!-- Message sent by User:Cyberpower678@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2025/Coordination/MM/01&oldid=1322757968 -->

A barnstar for you!



{| style="background-color: var(--background-color-success-subtle, #fdffe7); border: 1px solid var(--border-color-success, #fceb92); color: var(--color-base, #202122);"
|rowspan="2" style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 5px;" | 100px ↗
|style="font-size: x-large; padding: 3px 3px 0 3px; height: 1.5em;" | '''The Barnstar of Good Humor'''
|-
|style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;" | Este agradecimento é pelo excelente trabalho realizado na lista semanal dos artigos mais visualizados. Obrigado, Igordebraga.
Emperor Sheev Palpatine of Naboo (talk) 20:37, 22 November 2025 (UTC)
|}

Good article reassessment for Rock Band (video game) ↗


Rock Band (video game) ↗ has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page ↗. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 16:20, 14 December 2025 (UTC)

Draft:2025 Top 50 Report ↗


I am going to lumber you with this one as the above draft has no talk page. Can I suggest, in accordance with MOS:NUMBERSIGN ↗, that the prefixed '''#''' throughout is replaced by either '''number''' or '''No.''' (or even '''no.'''). Without the bolding, of course. Thanks. - Derek R Bullamore (talk) 22:36, 17 December 2025 (UTC)

:@Derek R Bullamore I moved to the Wikipedia namespace that would be the article's eventual destination, should be enough. igordebraga ≠ ↗ 23:17, 17 December 2025 (UTC)

Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2026!


{| style="background-color: #fdffe7; border: 4px solid #FFD700;"
| style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 2px;" | 200px ↗
| style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;" | '''Hello Igordebraga, may you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this seasonal occasion ↗. Spread the WikiLove ↗ by wishing another user a Merry Christmas ↗ and a Happy New Year ↗, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New Year 2026. <br />Happy editing,'''<br />
'''Wishes from''' <span class="nowrap"><span style="font-family:Comic Sans MS;color:#0078D7;">'''''Vestrian24Bio'''''</span></span>
| style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 2px;" | 200px ↗
|}
Click here ↗ to see the Christmas message I wrote...💞! <span class="nowrap"><span style="font-family:Comic Sans MS;color:#0078D7;">'''''Vestrian24Bio'''''</span></span> 13:05, 25 December 2025 (UTC)

Welcome to the 2026 WikiCup!



Happy New Year and Happy New WikiCup! The 2026 competition has just begun and all article creators, expanders, improvers and reviewers are welcome to take part. Even if you are a novice editor, we hope the WikiCup will give you a chance to improve your editing skills as you go. If you have already signed up, your submissions page can be found '''here ↗'''. If you have not yet signed up, you can '''add your name here ↗''', and a bot will set up your submissions page within one day, ready for you to take part. Any questions on the scoring, rules or anything else should be directed to one of the judges, or posted to the WikiCup talk page ↗.

For the 2026 WikiCup, the highest-ranking contestants will receive tournament points ↗ at the end of each round, and final rankings are decided by the number of tournament points each contestant has. This is the same scoring system that we had last year. If you're busy and can't sign up in January, don't worry: Signups are open throughout the year. To make things fairer for latecomers, the lowest-scoring contestants are no longer eliminated at the end of each round.

The first round will end on 26 February. The judges for the WikiCup this year are: {{User4|Cwmhiraeth}}, {{User4|Epicgenius}}, {{User4|Frostly}}, {{User4|Guerillero}} and {{User4|Lee Vilenski}}. Good luck! <small>If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send ↗.</small> MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:38, 1 January 2026 (UTC)
<!-- Message sent by User:Epicgenius@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send&oldid=1330482987 -->

Good article reassessment for Houston Rockets ↗


Houston Rockets ↗ has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page ↗. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 22:37, 2 January 2026 (UTC)

Barnstar!



{| class="barnstar" style="border:1px solid gray; background:#fdffe7;"
|-
|rowspan="2" style="padding-right:5px;" | 100px ↗

|style="font-size:1.65em; padding:0; height: 1.1em;" | <strong>The Working Man's Barnstar</strong>
|-
|style="border-top: 1px solid gray;" | For getting the Top 50 report finally done, despite obvious frustration, I award you this small token. <b><span style="color: #00b;">Serendi</span><sup><span style="color: #b00;">pod</span></sup> ↗<span style="color: #00b;">ous</span></b> 14:17, 5 February 2026 (UTC)
|}

Request to review Bella Ramsey ↗ FAC nomination ↗



Hi @Igordebraga. Apologies for contacting you out of the blue but I was wondering whether you be willing to take a look at my featured article nomination ↗ for Bella Ramsey ↗'s page? I noticed you’ve recently reviewed Chris Pratt's FAC, and I’d really value any feedback or suggestions you had. Thanks! Crp74 (talk) 10:34, 25 February 2026 (UTC)

Scream 7



Thanks for providing a plot draft for Scream 7! However I do note that you missed a few characters' names. See here:

Talk:Scream 7#Name mentions ↗

Thanks! NarutoSan6000 (talk) 04:34, 26 February 2026 (UTC)

WikiCup 2026 March newsletter



The first round of the 2026 WikiCup ended on 26 February. As some of you may have noticed, good article nomination reviews ↗ now receive 10 points, an increase from 5 points in the previous year, as per a consensus at WT:CUP ↗. This point increase has been retroactively applied to all good article reviews for which competitors have claimed points in this round. Peer reviews ↗, which continue to be worth 5 points, are now listed in the same section as featured article candidate reviews ↗, rather than with good article reviews. Everyone who competed in round 1 will advance to round 2 unless they have withdrawn or been banned. No other changes to the round-point system have been made for this year.

Round 1 was competitive. Three contestants scored more than 1,000 round points, and the top 16 contestants all scored more than 300 round points. The following competitors scored more than 800 round points:


The full scores for round 1 can be seen here ↗. During this round, contestants have claimed 7 featured articles, 16 featured lists, 2 featured-topic articles, 168 good articles, 13 good-topic articles and more than 50 Did You Know articles. In addition, competitors have worked on 14 In the News ↗ articles, and they have conducted nearly 700 reviews. The tournament points table ↗ will be updated within the next few days.

Remember that any content promoted after 26 February but before the start of Round 2 can be claimed in Round 2. Invitations for collaborative writing efforts or any other discussion of potentially interesting work is always welcome on the WikiCup talk page. Remember, if two or more WikiCup competitors have done significant work on an article, all can claim points. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed ↗. If you want to help out with the WikiCup, feel free to review one of the nominations listed on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed. Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup ↗, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages. Good luck! <small>If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send ↗.</small> MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:57, 27 February 2026 (UTC)
<!-- Message sent by User:Epicgenius@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send&oldid=1340412148 -->

Thank you



{| style="border: 1px solid gray; background-color: #fdffe7;"
|rowspan="2" style="vertical-align:middle;" |{{#ifeq:{{{2}}}|alt|100px ↗|100px ↗}}
|rowspan="2" |
|style="font-size: x-large; padding: 0; vertical-align: middle; height: 1.1em;" | '''The ''Signpost'' Barnstar'''
|-
|style="vertical-align: middle; border-top: 1px solid gray;" | For helping to write an interesting and useful Traffic report (vol. 22 issue 4 ↗ and always).&nbsp;&nbsp;
|} ☆ <span style="white-space:nowrap;font-family: Papyrus">Bri</span> (talk) 05:03, 10 March 2026 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Destubathon of the Americas ↗


You are invited to participate in the '''Destubathon of the Americas ↗''', a contest/editathon which will run from May 1 to May 31. The goal is to destub as many of our 475,000+ stubs for the Americas (from Alaska down to Chile) as possible. A good chance to have fun in expanding many of our old stale stubs and win up to £2000 ($2680) in Amazon vouchers for expanding stub articles. Sign up in the Contestants/participants section on the contest page if interested. Even if not interested in prizes you are still warmly welcome to participate in it as an editathon! Hopefully we can achieve something significant in the month of May together! ♦ <span style="font-variant:small-caps;color:#aba67e">''Dr. Blofeld''</span> 17:05, 15 April 2026 (UTC)

400th Report



{| style="border: 1px solid gray; background-color: #fdffe7;"
|rowspan="2" style="vertical-align:middle;" |{{#ifeq:{{{2}}}|alt|100px ↗|100px ↗}}
|rowspan="2" |
|style="font-size: x-large; padding: 0; vertical-align: middle; height: 1.1em;" | '''The ''Signpost'' Barnstar'''
|-
|style="vertical-align: middle; border-top: 1px solid gray;" | For the report covering April 12 to 18, 2026 ↗, the 400th report you have contributed to. {{u|Rahcmander}} (talk) 04:00, 24 April 2026 (EST)
|}

WikiCup 2026 May newsletter



The second round of the 2026 WikiCup ended on 28 April. As a reminder for contestants who just joined or are unaware of recent changes to our round-points system, good article nomination reviews ↗ now receive 10 points, an increase from 5 points in the previous year, as per a consensus at WT:CUP ↗. Peer reviews ↗, which continue to be worth 5 points, are now listed in the same section as featured article candidate reviews ↗, rather than with good article reviews. Everyone who competed in round 2 will advance to round 3 unless they have withdrawn or been banned. No other changes to the round-point system have been made for this year.

Round 2 was competitive. Three contestants scored more than 1,000 round points; nine scored over 500; and fourteen scored over 300. The top seven contestants had at least one featured article ↗ (two of them with two apiece). The following competitors scored more than 800 round points:


The full scores for round 2 can be seen here ↗. During this round, contestants have claimed 12 featured articles, 13 featured lists, 2 featured-topic articles, 106 good articles, 22 good-topic articles and more than 40 Did You Know articles. In addition, competitors have worked on 3 In the News ↗ articles, and they have conducted over 200 reviews. The tournament points table ↗ has been updated.

Remember that any content promoted after 28 April but before the start of Round 3 can be claimed in Round 3. Invitations for collaborative writing efforts or any other discussion of potentially interesting work is always welcome on the WikiCup talk page. Remember, if two or more WikiCup competitors have done significant work on an article, all can claim points. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed ↗. If you want to help out with the WikiCup, feel free to review one of the nominations listed on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed. Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup ↗, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages. Good luck! <small>If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send ↗.</small> MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:49, 29 April 2026 (UTC)
<!-- Message sent by User:Epicgenius@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send&oldid=1351688849 -->

Less views visible



Hello {{ping|Igordebraga}}

In Wikipedia:Top 25 Report/May 17 to 23, 2026 ↗, the Cockroach Janta Party ↗ is placed at 6th position with 705,936 views. I checked the Pageviews Analysis ↗ and it is showing 705,936 views for only 2 days - 20 and 21 May (203,289 and 502,400). The actual views on the article for the week is more. I request you to update the numbers.

Regards Calmly Trying (talk) 10:23, 25 May 2026 (UTC)

June 2026 GAN Backlog Drive



{| style="border: 5px solid #ABCDEF ; background-color: #FFF; padding:10px 15px 0; color: black"
|style="padding: 0; vertical-align: middle; height: 1.1em; font-size:130%" |'''Good article nominations ↗ |''' <span style="font-size:85%">June 2026 Backlog Drive</span>
|rowspan=3|right|75px ↗
|-
|'''June 2026 Backlog Drive:'''
Do you want to become more experienced in the GA process?
Interested in taking part? You can '''sign up here ↗'''.
|-
|colspan=2|'''Other ways to participate:'''
|-
|colspan=2 style="font-size:85%; padding-top:15px;"|You're receiving this message because you have participated in a good article review this year or participated in the previous backlog drive.
|}

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:58, 25 May 2026 (UTC)
<!-- Message sent by User:TechnoSquirrel69@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Good_articles/GAN_Backlog_Drives/June_2026/Mass_message_list&oldid=1356124266 -->

Teamwork barnstar



thumb|Teamwork barnstar|left ↗ For the impressive collective quantity of content in Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/Archives/2026-05-22 ↗ generated by a large number of people for a single ''Signpost'' issue, and which was published on time. <span style="white-space:nowrap;"><span style="color:#01796f; text-shadow:#00BFFF 0 0 1.0em">↠Pine</span> <span style="color:DeepSkyBlue">(<b style="color:#FFDF00;text-shadow:#FFDF00 0 0 1.0em">✉</b>)</span></span> 04:22, 30 May 2026 (UTC)

Nomination of :Icon (Megadeth album) ↗ for redirecting to Megadeth discography#Compilation albums ↗


<div class="afd-notice">
<div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0;">48px|alt=|link= ↗</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article :Icon (Megadeth album) ↗ is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines ↗ or whether it should be redirected ↗ to Megadeth discography#Compilation albums ↗.

The article is being discussed at '''Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Icon (Megadeth album) ↗''' until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the AfD notice from the article until the discussion is closed.<!-- Template:Afd notice --></div> Mika1h (talk) 12:41, 4 June 2026 (UTC)

Nomination of :Icon (Megadeth album) ↗ for deletion


<div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">48px|alt=|link= ↗</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article :Icon (Megadeth album) ↗, to which you have significantly contributed ↗, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines ↗ or if it should be deleted ↗.

The discussion will take place at '''Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Icon (Megadeth album) ↗''' until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by ''SDZeroBot'' (talk) 01:01, 5 June 2026 (UTC)<!-- User:SDZeroBot/AfD notifier/template -->

Your nomination of Casino Royale (2006 film) ↗ is under review



Your good article nomination ↗ of the article Casino Royale (2006 film) ↗ is <span class="nowrap">20px|alt=|link= ↗ </span>'''under review'''. See '''Talk:Casino Royale (2006 film)/GA1{{!}}the review page ↗''' for more information. This may take up to 7 days; feel free to contact the reviewer with any questions you might have.<!-- Template:GANotice default --> <!-- Template:GANotice --> <small>Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of ABehjat</small> -- ABehjat (talk) 18:02, 18 June 2026 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 25



An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Formiga (footballer, born 1978) ↗, a link pointing to the disambiguation page SBT ↗ was added.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 22:48, 25 June 2026 (UTC)

WikiCup 2026 July newsletter



The third round of the 2026 WikiCup ended on 28 June at 23:59 (UTC). As a reminder, good article nomination reviews ↗ now receive 10 points, while peer reviews ↗, which continue to be worth 5 points, are now listed in the same section as featured article candidate reviews ↗, rather than with good article reviews. Everyone who competed in round 3 will advance to round 4 unless they have withdrawn or been banned. No other changes to the round-point system have been made for this year.

Round 3 was competitive. Three contestants scored more than 1,000 round points; eight scored over 500; and thirteen scored over 300. The top three contestants had at least one featured article ↗ (two of them with two apiece). The following competitors scored more than 800 round points:


The full scores for round 3 can be seen here ↗. During this round, contestants have claimed 12 featured articles, 12 featured lists, 7 featured-topic articles, 117 good articles, 74 good-topic articles and more than 30 Did You Know articles. In addition, competitors have worked on 13 In the News ↗ articles, and they have conducted nearly 180 reviews. The tournament points table ↗ has been updated.

Remember that any content promoted after 28 June but before the start of Round 4 can be claimed in Round 4. Invitations for collaborative writing efforts or any other discussion of potentially interesting work is always welcome on the WikiCup talk page. Remember, if two or more WikiCup competitors have done significant work on an article, all can claim points. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed ↗. If you want to help out with the WikiCup, feel free to review one of the nominations listed on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed. Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup ↗, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages. Good luck! <small>If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send ↗.</small> MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:49, 29 June 2026 (UTC)
<!-- Message sent by User:Epicgenius@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send&oldid=1361686567 -->

Your nomination of Casino Royale (2006 film) ↗ has passed



Your good article nomination ↗ of the article Casino Royale (2006 film) ↗ has <span class="nowrap">20px|alt=|link= ↗ </span>'''passed'''; congratulations! See '''Talk:Casino Royale (2006 film)/GA1{{!}}the review page ↗''' for more information. If the article is eligible to appear ↗ in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it ↗ within the next seven days. Please also consider reviewing ↗ somebody else's nomination to help keep the backlog down.<!-- Template:GANotice |result=pass --> <!-- Template:GANotice --> <small>Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of ABehjat</small> -- ABehjat (talk) 20:42, 29 June 2026 (UTC)