User Talk: Mesocyclonic93

Server-side rendered snapshot of this editor's Wikipedia talk page discussions.

{{pp-semi|expiry=indefinite|reason=Persistent vandalism, user can request it be lifted whenever needed}}
{{bots|deny=DPL bot}}
{{User:MiszaBot/config
| algo=old(90d)
| archive=User talk:Mesocyclonic93/Archive %(counter)d
| counter=1
| maxarchivesize=200K
| archiveheader={{Archive}}
| minthreadsleft=5
| minthreadstoarchive=2
}}
{{Talk header}}
{{Archives}}

May 2026 Administrator Election – Call for Candidates

<div style="border: 5px solid #ABCDEF; padding: 0.5em 1em 0 1em;" role="article">
right|80px ↗
The administrator elections process has officially started! Interested editors are encouraged to self-nominate or arrange to be nominated by reviewing the instructions at '''Wikipedia:Administrator elections/May 2026/Candidates ↗'''.

Here is the schedule:

April 29 – May 5: Call for candidates

May 8–12: Discussion phase

May 13–19: SecurePoll voting phase

Please note the following:

The requirements to run are identical to RFA ↗—a prospective candidate must be extended confirmed ↗.

Prospective candidates are advised to become familiar with the community's expectations of administrators, which are much higher than the minimum requirement of having extended confirmed status. This includes reviewing successful ↗ and unsuccessful ↗ RFAs, reading the essay Wikipedia:Advice for admin elections candidates ↗, and possibly requesting an optional poll on their chances of passing ↗.

The process will have a seven day call for candidates phase, a two day pause, a five day discussion phase, and a seven day private vote using SecurePoll. Discussion and questions are only allowed on the candidate pages during the discussion phase.

The outcome of this process is identical to making a request for adminship. There is '''no official difference''' between an administrator appointed through RFA versus administrator elections.

Administrator elections are also a valid means of regaining adminship for de-sysopped editors ↗.

Ask any questions about the process at the talk page ↗. Later, a user talk message will be sent to official candidates with additional information about the process.

If you are interested in the process, please make sure to watchlist the appropriate pages. A watchlist notice will be added when the discussion phase opens, and again when the voting phase opens.

You're receiving this message because you signed up for the mailing list. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from the list ↗.
</div>

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:31, 29 April 2026 (UTC)

May 2026 Administrator Elections – Discussion Phase

{{Wikipedia:Administrator elections/May 2026/MMS/Discussion phase}} -- MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:22, 8 May 2026 (UTC)

What did i do wrong?

All Ive changed was the diff to update on the discussion Honeypack (talk) 16:07, 8 May 2026 (UTC)

:In general, you are not supposed to edit other people's comments, and the purpose of the link you changed is to link to the ''first'' attempt to communicate, not the most recent attempt. Mesocyclonic93 (t)(c ↗) 16:09, 8 May 2026 (UTC)
::Got you, thanks Honeypack (talk) 16:10, 8 May 2026 (UTC)

BNB Smart Chain

Hello, I've received this feedback from you: '' I'm Mesocyclonic93. I wanted to let you know that one or more external links you added to BNB Smart Chain (blockchain platform) have been removed because they seemed to be inappropriate for an encyclopedia. Take a look at our guidelines about external links. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page.''

Could you please let me know why the links have been removed? And what kind of links would be appropriate instead?

Also, was this the only issue? I'd like to update the page as it's not painting the full picture.

Looking forward to hearing from you Wikichain1 (talk) 21:28, 11 May 2026 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: :Wikipedia:Artikel erstellen ↗

Hello Mesocyclonic93. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of :Wikipedia:Artikel erstellen ↗, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Not nonsense - there is meaningful content. Thank you. CoconutOctopus talk 18:59, 12 May 2026 (UTC)

May 2026 Administrator Elections – Voting Phase

<div style="border: 5px solid #ABCDEF; padding: 0.5em 1em 0 1em;" role="article">
right|80px ↗
The voting phase of the May 2026 administrator elections has started and will continue until {{Administrator elections status/data|May 2026|end}} at {{Administrator election time|end}} UTC. You can participate in the voting phase at '''Wikipedia:Administrator elections/May 2026/Voting phase ↗'''.

As a reminder, the schedule of the election is:

{{Administrator elections/Header/daterange|May 2026|begin|end}}: SecurePoll voting phase ('''we are here''')

Scrutineering phase

In the voting phase, the candidate subpages close to public questions and discussion, and everyone who qualifies to vote ↗ has a week to use the SecurePoll ↗ software to vote, which uses a secret ballot ↗. You can see who voted, but not who they voted for. Please note that the vote totals cannot be made public until after voting has ended and as such, it will not be possible for you to see an individual candidate's vote total during the election. The suffrage requirements ↗ are similar to those at RFA.

Once voting concludes, we will begin the scrutineering phase, which will last for a few days, perhaps longer. Once everything is certified, the results will be posted on the results page ↗ (this is a good page to watchlist), and transcluded to the main election page ↗. In order to be granted adminship, a non-recall candidate must have received at least 70.0% support, calculated as Support / (Support + Oppose), and a minimum of 20 support votes. Recall ↗ candidates must achieve 55.0% support ↗. Because this is a vote and not a consensus, there are no bureaucrat discussions ↗ ("crat chats").

Any questions or issues can be asked on the election talk page ↗. Thank you for your participation. Happy electing.

You're receiving this message because you signed up for the mailing list. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from the list ↗.
</div>

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:10, 13 May 2026 (UTC)

Some baklava for you!

June 2026 GAN Backlog Drive

{| style="border: 5px solid #ABCDEF ; background-color: #FFF; padding:10px 15px 0; color: black"
|style="padding: 0; vertical-align: middle; height: 1.1em; font-size:130%" |'''Good article nominations ↗ |''' June 2026 Backlog Drive
|rowspan=3|right|75px ↗
|-
|'''June 2026 Backlog Drive:'''
Do you want to become more experienced in the GA process?

On 1 June, a one-month backlog drive for good article nominations will begin.

Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles reviewed.

Mentors are available, and new reviewers (<6 reviews) get bonus points!

Interested in taking part? You can '''sign up here ↗'''.
|-
|colspan=2|'''Other ways to participate:'''

Join the conversations on our talk page ↗.

|-
|colspan=2 style="font-size:85%; padding-top:15px;"|You're receiving this message because you have participated in a good article review this year or participated in the previous backlog drive.
|}

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:59, 25 May 2026 (UTC)

Discussion about Enid and Western Kentucky

Both deserve EF5 personally imo because, Western Kentucky swept off an entire second floor of a two story, well built, brick church, and badly damage the first floor which definitely is EF5. Also Enid swept a well built, and anchor bolted home clean that was constructed to be similar to some of the Moore EF5 homes. ~2026-37036-48 ↗ (talk) 14:34, 27 June 2026 (UTC)

:It's not our job to decide that. Tetradisulfate (talk) 19:52, 27 June 2026 (UTC)
:What your doing can VERY easily be counted as Vandalism, its not your job to decide what tornadoes get to be an EF5, that's for the NWS. TornadoEF4 (talk) 20:33, 27 June 2026 (UTC)

Changes

please do not add nonsense to articles. There is a discussion on the talk page of Southern Rhodesia ↗, which all the autorevert people have deliberately chosen to ignore. That article(and others) read like they had been written like a small child. There was a profound misunderstanding, that an adolescent could spot the obvious flaw. ~2026-37475-67 ↗ (talk) 13:36, 1 July 2026 (UTC)

::please read the discussion page. You are effectively vandalising articles. ~2026-37475-67 ↗ (talk) 13:39, 1 July 2026 (UTC)

::: Have you read the discussion? If not, every revert you make is disruptive. ~2026-37475-67 ↗ (talk) 13:42, 1 July 2026 (UTC)
::::It seems like you, for the last two days, have been it warring without participating in the discussion ''you started''. I have only made a single edit on any of the Rhodesia pages, and youve been doing way more disruptive editing than I have. At this point I might just report you to WP:ANEW ↗ or WP:ANI ↗. Mesocyclonic93 (t)(c ↗) 13:46, 1 July 2026 (UTC)
:::::What exactly is "disruptive"? Correcting an obvious error, that a 12-year-old would laugh at? Just because this preposterous wording has been there for a while, unsourced, doesn't make it Right. ~2026-37475-67 ↗ (talk) 15:54, 1 July 2026 (UTC)
::::::Edit warring is disruptive. Mesocyclonic93 (t)(c ↗) 18:09, 1 July 2026 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

{| style="background-color: var(--background-color-success-subtle, #fdffe7); border: 1px solid var(--border-color-success, #fceb92); color: var(--color-base, #202122);"
|rowspan="2" style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 5px;" | 100px ↗
|style="font-size: x-large; padding: 3px 3px 0 3px; height: 1.5em;" | '''The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar'''
|-
|style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;" | For your great work dealing with vandalism and playing sockpuppet whack-a-mole over at Siahkal Mahalleh ↗; and for your consistent anti-vandalism contributions overall. Thank you! AntiDionysius (talk) 12:40, 2 July 2026 (UTC)
|}