W
Active Editors
Back to Profile

User Talk: Narym2025

Server-side rendered snapshot of this editor's Wikipedia talk page discussions.


Welcome!


Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia ↗! Thank you for your contributions ↗; however, ''please'' remember the essential rule of respecting copyright ↗s. '''Edits to Wikipedia, such as your edit to the page :Siberian Tatars ↗, may not contain material from copyrighted sources unless that text is available under a suitable free license ↗.''' It is almost never okay to copy extensive text out of a book or website and paste it into a Wikipedia article with little or no alteration, though you ''can'' clearly and briefly quote copyrighted text in the right circumstances. Content that does not comply with this legal rule must be removed. For more information on this, see:

If you still have questions, there is the Teahouse ↗, or you can {{edit|Special:MyTalk|click here to ask a question on your talk page|section=new|preload=Help:Contents/helpmepreload|preloadtitle=Help me!}} and someone will be along to answer it shortly. As you get started, you may find the pages below to be helpful.


I hope you enjoy editing Wikipedia! Please sign your name ↗ on talk pages using four tilde ↗s (<nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Feel free to write a note on the bottom of my talk page if you want to get in touch with me. Again, welcome! <!-- Template:Welcome-copyright --> — Diannaa&nbsp;<span style="color:red">🍁</span>&nbsp;(talk) 22:56, 23 May 2025 (UTC)

July 2025



25px|alt=Information icon ↗ Hello, I'm Mellk. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, :Ket people ↗, but you didn't provide a reliable source ↗. On Wikipedia, it's important that article content be verifiable ↗. If you'd like to resubmit your change with a citation ↗, your edit is archived in the page history ↗. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. <!-- Template:uw-unsourced1 --> Mellk (talk) 05:48, 19 July 2025 (UTC)

25px|alt=Information icon ↗ Please do not add or change content, as you did at :Siberian Tatars ↗, without citing a reliable source ↗. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources ↗ to see how to add references to an article. Thank you.<!-- Template:uw-unsourced2 --> --Altenmann ↗ >talk ↗ 02:17, 24 July 2025 (UTC)

Recent edit reversion


In this edit here ↗, I reverted some information that appears to be a violation of our copyright policy ↗.

I provided a brief summary of the problem in the edit summary, which should be visible just below my name. You can also click on the "view history" tab in the article to see the recent history of the article. This should be an edit with my name, and a parenthetical comment explaining why your edit was reverted. If that information is not sufficient to explain the situation, please ask.

I do occasionally make mistakes. We get hundreds of reports of potential copyright violations every week, and sometimes there are false positives, for a variety of reasons. (Perhaps the material was moved from another Wikipedia article, or the material was properly licensed but the license information was not obvious, or the material is in the public domain but I didn't realize it was public domain, and there can be other situations generating a report to our Copy Patrol tool that turn out not to be actual copyright violations.) If you think my edit was mistaken, please politely let me know and I will investigate. <span style="color:#000E2F;padding:0 4px;font-family: Copperplate Gothic Light">S Philbrick</span><span style=";padding:0 4px;color:# 000;font-family: Copperplate Gothic Light">(Talk)</span> 10:57, 24 July 2025 (UTC)

August 2025



30px|link=|alt=Copyright problem icon ↗ Your edit to :Kurdak-Sargat Tatars ↗ has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted ↗ material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission ↗ from the copyright holder. If you {{em|are}} the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials ↗ for information on how to contribute your work appropriately. For legal reasons, Wikipedia strictly cannot host copyrighted text or images from print media or digital platforms without an appropriate ↗ and verifiable license. Contributions infringing on copyright will be removed. You may use external websites or publications as a source of {{em|information}}, but not as a source of {{em|content}}, such as sentences or images&mdash;you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy '''will be blocked from editing ↗'''. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources ↗ for more information. <!-- Template:uw-copyright --> The4lines &#124;&#124;&#124;&#124; (talk) 16:21, 10 August 2025 (UTC)

September 2025


25px|alt=Information icon ↗ I've noticed you keep reverting this paragraph on this article https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Jie_people&diff=prev&oldid=1309936751 ↗, I've checked the source and there's no mention of the clans that are mentioned. The no original research ↗ is an important policy of Wikipedia, please do not revert or change the content without citing verifiable sources. LothofOrkney (talk) 09:27, 7 September 2025 (UTC)

25px|alt=Information icon ↗ Please do not add external links to the same paper into numerous articles, like you did, e.g., here ↗. This looks like a promotion of Nikolai Tomilov. If there is something useful in this paper, please add information into the corresponding Wikipedia article. --Altenmann ↗ >talk ↗ 17:58, 7 September 2025 (UTC)

Tobol Tatars ↗ moved to draftspace



Thanks for your contributions to Tobol Tatars ↗. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because '''it needs more sources to establish notability'''.
I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page ↗.
When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. '''<span style="color:#536895;">Onel</span><span style="color:#ffb300;">5969</span>''' <sup><i style="color:blue">TT me</i></sup> 15:31, 14 September 2025 (UTC)

October 2025



25px|alt=Information icon ↗ Hello, I'm Sumanuil. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions ↗&#32;to :Yeniseian peoples ↗ have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse ↗ or the Help desk ↗. ''The source says she's Evenki, and that's a better picture anyway.''<!-- Template:uw-vandalism1 --> &nbsp;<span style="color:Purple">'''''Sumanuil'''''</span><span style="color:Purple">'''. '''</span><sub><span style="color:Purple">(talk to me)</span> ↗</sub> 04:46, 5 October 2025 (UTC)

25px|alt=Information icon ↗ Hello, I'm M Imtiaz. I noticed that you recently removed content ↗ from :Khakas ↗&nbsp;without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary ↗. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page ↗. Thanks.<!-- Template:uw-delete1 --> M Imtiaz (talk · contribs ↗) 19:13, 14 October 2025 (UTC)
:{{ping|M Imtiaz}} The removal was correct: whoever added the text did not read the cited sources carefully. I fixed the article. However you are right: '''removal of a text with referenced must always be explained''', because it always looks suspicious. --Altenmann ↗ >talk ↗ 19:42, 14 October 2025 (UTC)
::@Altenmann Thanks. I looked at the snippet that was quoted from one of the sources and I got the impression that a name used until Soviet times might still be validly listed as an alternative one in the lede, but I'm happy to have been corrected. M Imtiaz (talk · contribs ↗) 19:49, 14 October 2025 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation ↗: Tobol Tatars ↗ (November 4)


<div style="border: solid 1px #FCC; background-color: var(--background-color-warning-subtle, #fdf2d5); color: inherit; padding: 0.5em 1em; margin: 1.5em; width: 90%;"> 50px|left ↗Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation ↗ has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time.<nowiki> </nowiki>The reason left by Aesurias was:

{{divbox|gray|3=This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources ↗. ''Reliable'' sources are required so that information can be verified ↗. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners ↗ and Citing sources ↗.|}}<!--
--
--> Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit ''after they have been resolved''.
{{clear}}

Aesurias (talk) 23:36, 4 November 2025 (UTC)</div><!--Template:AfC decline-->

:Category:Indigenous peoples of the Subarctic ↗



Please do not add peoples to the category not coonfirmed by sources. --Altenmann ↗ >talk ↗ 14:06, 17 November 2025 (UTC)

ArbCom 2025 Elections voter message



<div class="ivmbox " style="margin-bottom: 1em; border: 1px solid #a2a9b1; background-color: #fdf2d5; padding: 0.5em; display: flex; align-items: center; ">
<div class="ivmbox-image" style="padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em;flex-basis: 40px">40px ↗</div>
<div class="ivmbox-text">
Hello! Voting in the '''2025 Arbitration Committee elections ↗''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2025|end}}-1 day}}. All '''eligible users ↗''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee ↗ is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process ↗. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans ↗, topic bans ↗, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy ↗ describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please review the candidates ↗ and submit your choices on the '''2025|poll}}|voting page ↗'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. <small>MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:51, 18 November 2025 (UTC)</small>

</div>
</div>
<!-- Message sent by User:Cyberpower678@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2025/Coordination/MM/09&oldid=1322758983 -->

Your submission at Articles for creation ↗: Tobol Tatars ↗ (December 21)


<div style="border: solid 1px #FCC; background-color: var(--background-color-warning-subtle, #fdf2d5); color: inherit; padding: 0.5em 1em; margin: 1.5em; width: 90%;"> 50px|left ↗Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation ↗ has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time.<nowiki> </nowiki>The reasons left by Ktkvtsh were:

{{divbox|gray|3=This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources ↗. ''Reliable'' sources are required so that information can be verified ↗. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners ↗ and Citing sources ↗.|}}<!--
-->{{divbox|gray|3=This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article ↗. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are: <br />
Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid ↗ when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.|}}<!--
--
--> Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit ''after they have been resolved''.
{{clear}}

<span style="color:#4B0082; font-weight:bold;">Kt</span><span style="color:#008080; font-weight:bold;">kv</span><span style="color:#B8860B; font-weight:bold;">tsh</span> <span style="color:#555;">(talk)</span> 01:03, 21 December 2025 (UTC)</div><!--Template:AfC decline-->

{| style="margin: 0.4em 2em;"
|- style="vertical-align: top;"
| alt=Teahouse logo ↗
| <div style="background-color:#e1e6db; color: #393D38; padding: 1em; font-size: 1.1em; border-radius:10px;box-shadow:-2px -2px 1px #8e8a78;">Hello, '''Narym2025'''!
Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the '''Articles for creation help desk ↗'''. If you have any ''other'' questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the '''Teahouse ↗''', a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! <span style="color:#4B0082; font-weight:bold;">Kt</span><span style="color:#008080; font-weight:bold;">kv</span><span style="color:#B8860B; font-weight:bold;">tsh</span> <span style="color:#555;">(talk)</span> 01:03, 21 December 2025 (UTC)</div>
|}<!-- Wikipedia:Teahouse/AfC Invitation -->
Category:Wikipedians who have received a Teahouse invitation through AfC ↗

Your submission at Articles for creation ↗: Tobol Tatars ↗ (February 3)


<div style="border: solid 1px #FCC; background-color: var(--background-color-warning-subtle, #fdf2d5); color: inherit; padding: 0.5em 1em; margin: 1.5em; width: 90%;"> 50px|left ↗Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation ↗ has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time.<nowiki> </nowiki>The reason left by ChrysGalley was:

{{divbox|gray|3=This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources ↗. ''Reliable'' sources are required so that information can be verified ↗. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners ↗ and Citing sources ↗.|}}<!--
--
-->&nbsp;The comment the reviewer left was:

{{divbox|blue|3=The last declines have been for insufficient sourcing. This new submission only has a picture added since the previous decline. No new or changed sourcing.}} Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit it ''after they have been resolved''.
{{clear}}

ChrysGalley (talk) 14:40, 3 February 2026 (UTC)</div><!--Template:AfC decline-->

February 2026


25px|alt=Information icon ↗ Hello, I'm Replayful. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions ↗&nbsp;to :Greenlandic language ↗ have been undone because they appeared to be promotional. Advertising ↗ and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox ↗" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted; Wikipedia articles should be written objectively, using independent sources ↗, and from a neutral perspective ↗. Take a look at the welcome page ↗ to learn more about Wikipedia. Please do not reinsert the YouTube link. If you want to argue why it should be there, you should consider opening a discussion on the talk page. {{PAGENAME}} ↗<!-- Template:uw-advert1 --> //Replayful (talk &#124; contribs ↗) 11:52, 15 February 2026 (UTC)

urums aren't crimean tatars



you can keep reverting the idiotic wikipedia page buddy history and facts wouldn't change. &#126;2026-27681-74 ↗ (talk) 10:13, 7 May 2026 (UTC)


Flags in infoboxes



Please stop inserting, and reverting to reinsert, flags into infoboxes. This is against the manual of style as documented in MOS:INFOBOXFLAG ↗. <b style="color: Blue;">Canterbury Tail</b> <i style="color: Blue;">talk</i> 00:03, 14 May 2026 (UTC)
:Again you are continuing to reinsert flags into the infoboxes against the MOS. This is considered disruptive editing ↗. If you continue this line of editing you will be blocked for your deliberate disruptive editing. <b style="color: Blue;">Canterbury Tail</b> <i style="color: Blue;">talk</i> 19:36, 14 May 2026 (UTC)

Mayfung



You seems to be adding false information to the page please don’t do this &#126;2026-29745-69 ↗ (talk) 11:59, 18 May 2026 (UTC)

Your recent edits/revisions on Giray Dynasty




25px|alt=Information icon ↗ Hi Narym2025! I noticed that you've made several edits in order to restore a version of an article. The impulse to repeatedly undo an edit you disagree with is understandable, but I wanted to make sure that you're aware of Wikipedia's edit warring policy ↗. Repeatedly undoing the changes made by other users in a back-and-forth fashion like this is disallowed, even if you feel what you're doing is justifiable.

All editors are expected to discuss content disputes on article talk pages ↗ in order to try to reach a consensus ↗ with the other editors involved. If you are unable to come to an agreement, please use one of the dispute resolution options ↗ that are available in order to seek input from others. Using this approach instead of repeatedly reverting other editors' changes can help you avoid getting drawn into edit wars. Thank you.<!-- Template:uw-ewsoft --> <span style="font-size: 8pt;">signed, </span>A Random Hylian <span style="color:burgundy; font-size:10pt">(Parry)</span><span style="color:burgundy; font-size:10pt;">(swing)</span> ↗ 16:05, 23 May 2026 (UTC)


May 2026



30px|alt=Stop icon ↗ '''You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war ↗, according to the reverts you've made to :Sofia Gubaidulina ↗.''' This means that you are repeatedly reverting content back to how you think it should be, despite knowing that other editors disagree. Once it is known that there is a disagreement, users are expected to collaborate ↗ with others, avoid editing disruptively ↗, and try to reach a consensus ↗ – rather than repeatedly reverting the changes made by other users.

Important points to note:
# {{strong|Edit warring is disruptive behavior ↗ – regardless of how many reverts you have made;}}
# {{strong|Do not engage in edit warring – even if you believe that you are right.}}
You need to discuss the disagreement on the article's talk page ↗ and work towards a revision that represents consensus among everyone involved. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard ↗ or seek dispute resolution ↗ if discussions reach an impasse. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection ↗. {{strong|If you continue to engage in edit warring, you may be blocked ↗ from editing.}} ''Please explain why you think that we should include two '''less''' specific links instead. Plus, it's against MOS:OVERLINK ↗ to link "Poland ↗". Thanks,''<!-- Template:uw-ew --> Thedarkknightli (talk) 16:11, 27 May 2026 (UTC)

June 2026



25px|alt=icon ↗ Please stop your disruptive editing ↗.
If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at :Ket people ↗, you may be blocked from editing ↗. <!-- Template:uw-disruptive3 --> '''<span style="color:#00d5ff !important">Zack</span><span style="color:#007F94 !important">mann</span>''' (<sup>Talk to me ↗</sup>/<sub><span style="color:orange !important">What I been doing</span> ↗</sub>) 15:59, 13 June 2026 (UTC)

25px|alt=Information icon ↗ Hello. Your recent edit appears to have added a non-notable entity to a list that normally includes only notable entries. In general, a person, organization or product added to a list should have ↗ a pre-existing article before being added to most lists. If you wish to create such an article, please first confirm that the subject qualifies for a separate, stand-alone article according to Wikipedia's notability ↗ guideline. Thank you. <!-- Template:uw-badlistentry -->--<span style="color: black;">VViking</span><sub><span style="color: green">Talk</span><span style="color: purple;">Edits</span> ↗</sub> 14:16, 17 June 2026 (UTC)

30px|alt=Stop icon ↗ '''You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war ↗, according to the reverts you've made to :Balti people ↗.''' This means that you are repeatedly reverting content back to how you think it should be, despite knowing that other editors disagree. Once it is known that there is a disagreement, users are expected to collaborate ↗ with others, avoid editing disruptively ↗, and try to reach a consensus ↗ – rather than repeatedly reverting the changes made by other users.

Important points to note:
# {{strong|Edit warring is disruptive behavior ↗ – regardless of how many reverts you have made;}}
# {{strong|Do not engage in edit warring – even if you believe that you are right.}}
You need to discuss the disagreement on the article's talk page ↗ and work towards a revision that represents consensus among everyone involved. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard ↗ or seek dispute resolution ↗ if discussions reach an impasse. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection ↗. {{strong|If you continue to engage in edit warring, you may be blocked ↗ from editing.}} ''Please discuss image on Talk:Balti people ↗ rather than continuing to revert.''<!-- Template:uw-ew --> SomeoneDreaming (talk) 22:56, 20 June 2026 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 20



Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ket people ↗, a link pointing to the disambiguation page Chukotka ↗ was added. Such links are usually incorrect ↗, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. <small>(Read the FAQ{{*}} Join us at the DPL WikiProject ↗.)</small>

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 22:57, 20 June 2026 (UTC)

June 2026



30px|alt=Stop icon ↗ You appear to be engaged in an '''edit war ↗'''. An ''edit war'' occurs when editors who disagree about the content of a page repeatedly revert each other's changes. Please '''do not revert or undo''' the edits made by other editors when your changes are reverted. Instead, use the '''talk page ↗''' to discuss how the page can represent consensus ↗ among the editors involved. Here is some advice on how to do this ↗. If discussions get stuck, you can request a third opinion ↗, ask for help at a relevant noticeboard ↗, or seek dispute resolution ↗.

'''Edit warring can result in being blocked from editing ↗''', especially if you violate the three-revert rule ↗, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts ↗ within 24 hours on one page. Undoing any other editor's work, in whole or in part, involving the same or different material, is a revert. You can still be blocked for edit warring '''even if you do not violate the three-revert rule''' should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.<!-- Template:uw-3rr -->--Ermenrich (talk) 12:43, 21 June 2026 (UTC)

Introduction to contentious topics



{{ivmbox | image = Commons-emblem-notice.svg |imagesize=50px | bg = #E5F8FF | text = You have recently edited a page related to ''' the region of South Asia ↗ (India, Pakistan, Afghanistan, Sri Lanka, Bangladesh and Nepal), including but not limited to history, politics, ethnicity, and social groups''', a topic designated as '''''contentious ↗'''''. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and <em>does <strong>not</strong> imply that there are any issues with your editing</em>.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as ''contentious topics''. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee ↗. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia's norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators ↗ have an expanded level of powers and discretion in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit <strong>carefully and constructively</strong>, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

<p><strong>Additionally, you must be logged in, have 500 edits, and have an account age of 30 days ↗ in order to make edits related to two subtopics:</strong> (1) Indian military history, or (2) caste-related topics in South Asia.</p><p>Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics <em>procedures</em>, you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard ↗ or you may learn more about this contentious topic ↗. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{tl|Ctopics/aware}} template. </p>}}<!-- Derived from Template:Contentious topics/alert/first --> Sutyarashi (talk) 02:34, 22 June 2026 (UTC)

link=|25px|alt=Information icon ↗ There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents ↗ regarding an issue with which you may have been involved.<!--Template:Discussion notice--><!--Template:ANI-notice--> --Altenmann ↗ >talk ↗ 03:13, 22 June 2026 (UTC)

June 2026


<div class="user-block" style="padding: 5px; margin-bottom: 0.5em; border: 1px solid var(--border-color-base, #a2ab91); background-color: var(--background-color-warning-subtle, #fef6e7); color:inherit; min-height: 40px">40px|left|alt=Stop icon with clock ↗<div style="margin-left:45px">You have been '''blocked ↗''' from editing for a period of '''31 hours''' for edit warring ↗. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions ↗. </div><div style="margin-left:45px">During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes ↗ and seek consensus ↗. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution ↗, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection ↗.</div><div style="margin-left:45px">If you believe that there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks ↗, then submit a request through the unblock wizard ↗ or through <span class="plainlinks">[{{fullurl:Special:MyTalk|action=edit&section=new&editintro=Template:Unblock/editintro&preloadtitle=Unblock+request&preload=Template:Unblock/preload&preloadparams%5b%5d=}} your talk page]</span>. &nbsp;<span style="color:#be33ff;">Star</span> <span style="color:#ff33da;">Mississippi</span> 01:05, 23 June 2026 (UTC)</div></div><!-- Template:uw-ewblock -->

Unreferenced



25px|alt=Information icon ↗ Hello, I'm Canterbury Tail. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, but you didn't provide a reliable source ↗. On Wikipedia, it's important that article content be verifiable ↗. If you'd like to resubmit your change with a citation ↗, your edit is archived in the page history. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. <!-- Template:uw-unsourced1 --> <b style="color: Blue;">Canterbury Tail</b> <i style="color: Blue;">talk</i> 15:55, 2 July 2026 (UTC)

You're still adding unsourced and unsupported categories to articles. The category must be suported by the article and references. A reference that just says Tatars, does not mean Crimean Tatar.

25px|alt=Information icon ↗ Please do not add or change content without citing a reliable source ↗. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources ↗ to see how to add references to an article. Thank you.<!-- Template:uw-unsourced2 --> <b style="color: Blue;">Canterbury Tail</b> <i style="color: Blue;">talk</i> 18:20, 2 July 2026 (UTC)

:And you're still reinstating information that isn't supported by the sources. You've been warned about sources previously, and also been warned about edit warring. Please stop, and ensure any sources you add actually specifically support the claim you are trying to support. <b style="color: Blue;">Canterbury Tail</b> <i style="color: Blue;">talk</i> 19:28, 2 July 2026 (UTC)

25px|alt=Warning icon ↗ Please stop. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced ↗ content, you may be blocked from editing ↗. <!-- Template:uw-unsourced3 --> <b style="color: Blue;">Canterbury Tail</b> <i style="color: Blue;">talk</i> 19:28, 2 July 2026 (UTC)

30px|alt=Stop icon ↗ You may be '''blocked from editing ↗ without further warning''' the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced ↗ material to Wikipedia. <!-- Template:uw-unsourced4 --> <b style="color: Blue;">Canterbury Tail</b> <i style="color: Blue;">talk</i> 20:46, 2 July 2026 (UTC)

MOS violations


Please do not make edits contrarty to the MOS ↗, you re-added small fonts into an infobox against MOS:SMALL ↗ and MOS:SMALLFONT ↗. <b style="color: Blue;">Canterbury Tail</b> <i style="color: Blue;">talk</i> 18:20, 2 July 2026 (UTC)

Disruptive edits



And now you're removing sourced information and replacing it with unsourced ↗. That's purely disruptive editing. <b style="color: Blue;">Canterbury Tail</b> <i style="color: Blue;">talk</i> 19:31, 2 July 2026 (UTC)

:It looks like Narym2025 has continued their usual pattern right after coming from a block for similar reasons. I think they have been given enough rope ↗ and it's time for a formal WP:ANI report now. Sutyarashi (talk) 19:49, 4 July 2026 (UTC)

Blocked



For your persistent adding of unsourced material, edit warring, adding of your own original research, adding refs that clearly don't support the claims being made, general disruption and complete and utter refusal to discuss edits or use talk pages when your poor edits are reverted. Upon returning if you continue to add your own original research, don't source everything clearly, or continue editing warring or disruptive editing, you will be blocked indefinitely. <b style="color: Blue;">Canterbury Tail</b> <i style="color: Blue;">talk</i> 21:05, 5 July 2026 (UTC)

<div class="user-block" style="padding: 5px; margin-bottom: 0.5em; border: 1px solid var(--border-color-base, #a2ab91); background-color: var(--background-color-warning-subtle, #fef6e7); color:inherit; min-height: 40px">40px|left|alt=Stop icon with clock ↗<div style="margin-left:45px">You have been '''blocked ↗''' temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges ↗. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions ↗. </div><div style="margin-left:45px">If you believe that there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks ↗, then submit a request through the unblock wizard ↗ or through <span class="plainlinks">[{{fullurl:Special:MyTalk|action=edit&section=new&editintro=Template:Unblock/editintro&preloadtitle=Unblock+request&preload=Template:Unblock/preload&preloadparams%5b%5d=}} your talk page]</span>. </div></div><!-- Template:uw-block --> <b style="color: Blue;">Canterbury Tail</b> <i style="color: Blue;">talk</i> 21:05, 5 July 2026 (UTC)