W
Active Editors
Back to Profile

User Talk: Ohok12

Server-side rendered snapshot of this editor's Wikipedia talk page discussions.

Air Canada express incident



Hey, since you created that article, I suggest adding it to the list of accidents and incidents involving commercial aircraft since this incident now has an article. Writing because I'm not sure how you feel about it Nagito Komaeda the Second (talk) 17:13, 7 July 2025 (UTC)

:Why not, I also wanted to add it too. Just add it, that's my purpose. Ohok12 (talk) 00:42, 8 July 2025 (UTC)
::Feel free to add the accidents you created articles about to the list of accidents and incidents involving commercial aircraft, you're doing a great job Nagito Komaeda the Second (talk) 17:06, 10 July 2025 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!



{| style="background-color: var(--background-color-success-subtle, #fdffe7); border: 1px solid var(--border-color-success, #fceb92); color: var(--color-base, #202122);"
|rowspan="2" style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 5px;" | 100px ↗
|style="font-size: x-large; padding: 3px 3px 0 3px; height: 1.5em;" | '''The Original Barnstar'''
|-
|style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;" | For the hard work regarding aviation. I wish I could contribute to a similar degree but I have limited time Nagito Komaeda the Second (talk) 17:05, 10 July 2025 (UTC)
|}

:It's ok, thank you! Ohok12 (talk) 01:59, 11 July 2025 (UTC)

Nomination of :PAL Airlines Flight 2259 ↗ for deletion


<div class="afd-notice">
<div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0;">48px|alt=|link= ↗</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article :PAL Airlines Flight 2259 ↗ is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines ↗ or whether it should be deleted ↗.

The article will be discussed at '''Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PAL Airlines Flight 2259 ↗''' until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.<!-- Template:Afd notice --></div> CambridgeBayWeather (solidly non-human), Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva ↗ 15:29, 13 July 2025 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia and remember to use signatures!



25px|alt=Information icon ↗ Hello and welcome to Wikipedia ↗. When you add content to talk pages ↗ and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, such as at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PAL Airlines Flight 2259 ↗, please be sure to sign your posts ↗ (but never when editing articles). There are two ways to do this. Either:
# Add four tilde ↗s ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment, or
# With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button 22px|link=Wikipedia:How to sign your posts ↗ located above the edit window.
This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you.<!-- Template:uw-tilde --> <span style="color:#d3b683; text-decoration:underline;">11WB</span> (talk) 09:56, 15 July 2025 (UTC)

:Also wanted to add, writing an article is an extremely difficult challenge and steep learning curve! Kudos to you for creating one! I only began writing articles (including some on aviation) a few months back! I recommend checking out WP:AfC ↗ and submitting some through there to see how you get on! If you need any assistance, I would be happy to help! <span style="color:#d3b683; text-decoration:underline;">11WB</span> (talk) 09:59, 15 July 2025 (UTC)
::Really thank you for supporting me. Ohok12 (talk) 10:17, 15 July 2025 (UTC)

July 2025


<div class="user-block" style="padding: 5px; margin-bottom: 0.5em; border: 1px solid var(--border-color-base, #a2ab91); background-color: var(--background-color-warning-subtle, #fef6e7); color:inherit; min-height: 40px">40px|left|alt=Stop icon with clock ↗<div style="margin-left:45px">You have been '''blocked ↗''' from editing for a period of '''31 hours''' for persistently making disruptive edits ↗. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions ↗. </div><div style="margin-left:45px">If you believe that there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks ↗, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. --><code><nowiki>{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}</nowiki></code>. &nbsp;<span style="font-family:Papyrus; color:#800080;">'''''L'''''iz</span> <sup style="font-family: Times New Roman; color: #006400;">'''''Read!''''' ↗ '''''Talk!'''''</sup> 18:39, 15 July 2025 (UTC)</div></div><!-- Template:uw-disruptblock -->
:Personally (based on the conversation over on my talk page), I think this was just a tad harsh since you acknowledged your mistakes, but 1) the block is short, and 2) remember that blocks are intended to be protective of the encyclopedia rather than punitive to the user. Don't let it get you down, keep learning, and be more careful in the future. --<b style="color: green;">Finngall</b> <sup style="color: #D4A017;">talk</sup> ↗ 18:52, 15 July 2025 (UTC)
::@Ohok12, I genuinely do feel bad about this, because I said you wouldn't get into trouble. I did leave a message on Liz's talk page but it was certainly not in a negative light or a report. I am not going to comment on the block directly, whilst not good it would be inappropriate of me, as a new user myself, to do so. This is definitely a learning opportunity for us both and hopefully something positive can come of this! Please don't let this deter you from being apart of Wikipedia in the future! <span style="color:#d3b683; text-decoration:underline;">11WB</span> (talk) 19:02, 15 July 2025 (UTC)
:::Thank you for the forgiveness, I appreciate how you guys tried to solve my trouble. Ohok12 (talk) 16:16, 16 July 2025 (UTC)

Tagging Draft:KLM Flight 1204 ↗ for speedy deletion



You tagged Draft:KLM Flight 1204 ↗ for speedy deletion, which applied only to "a page where the author of the only substantial content has requested deletion". You do not qualify to tag the article as there are other author. &mdash; ERcheck (talk) 14:38, 17 July 2025 (UTC)

:Oh right, I forgot to check that there are still some editors edit the page. I'm sorry Ohok12 (talk) 17:18, 17 July 2025 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started



Hi Ohok12. Thank you for your work on Aeroflot Flight 8175 ↗. Another editor, 11wallisb, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol ↗ and left the following comment:

{{Bq|1=This article is well written, however some more references would be good.}}

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{code|<nowiki>{{Re|</nowiki>11wallisb<nowiki>}}</nowiki>}}. <small>(Message delivered via the Page Curation ↗ tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)</small><!-- Template:Sentnote-NPF -->

<span style="color:#8C6A31; text-decoration:underline;">11WB</span> (talk) 08:49, 31 August 2025 (UTC)

Aeroflot Flight 8175 ↗ moved to draftspace



Thanks for your contributions to Aeroflot Flight 8175 ↗. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because '''it needs more sources to establish notability'''.
I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page ↗.
When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Aviationwikiflight (talk) 09:38, 31 August 2025 (UTC)

:I also agree this article should be in the draft too, only one reference isn’t enough. Ohok12 (talk) 08:52, 1 September 2025 (UTC)
::An IP just added WP:SIGCOV ↗. I have moved it back into the article space because I don't think drafting is necessary anymore. I find it likely that more exist. The Knowledge Pirate (talk) 06:47, 3 September 2025 (UTC)

Nomination of :Aeroflot Flight 8175 ↗ for deletion


<div class="afd-notice">
<div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0;">48px|alt=|link= ↗</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article :Aeroflot Flight 8175 ↗ is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines ↗ or whether it should be deleted ↗.

The article will be discussed at '''Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aeroflot Flight 8175 ↗''' until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.<!-- Template:Afd notice --></div> <span style="color:#8C6A31; ">11WB</span> (talk) 05:26, 23 November 2025 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation ↗: Aviaco Flight 231 ↗ has been accepted


<div style="border:solid 1px #57DB1E; background:var(--background-color-success-subtle, #dff2eb); padding: 0.5em 1em; color: inherit; margin: 1.5em; width: 90%;">50px|left ↗ '''Aviaco Flight 231 ↗, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.'''<br />

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions. <br />

The article has been assessed as '''C-Class''', which is recorded on its talk page ↗. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top {{AfC talk/C percentage}} of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme ↗ to see how you can improve the article.

<div class="autoconfirmed-show">Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself ↗ without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation ↗ if you prefer.</div>

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the '''<span class="plainlinks" >[//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/New_question&withJS=MediaWiki:AFCHD-wizard.js&page=Aviaco_Flight_231 help desk]</span>'''.<span class="unconfirmed-show"> Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself ↗ without posting a request to Articles for creation ↗.</span>

Thanks again, and happy editing!
Aviationwikiflight (talk) 15:46, 24 February 2026 (UTC)</div><!--Template:AfC accept-->

Your submission at Articles for creation ↗: Peinador Accident ↗ (March 31)


<div style="border: solid 1px #FCC; background-color: var(--background-color-warning-subtle, #fdf2d5); color: inherit; padding: 0.5em 1em; margin: 1.5em; width: 90%;">'''Draft declined'''{{pb}}50px|left ↗Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Your draft submission to Articles for creation ↗ has been reviewed but not accepted at this time.{{pb}}
<nowiki> </nowiki>'''Feedback'''{{pb}}The reviewer, Wisenerd, left the following feedback:
{{divbox|gray|3=This draft is not adequately supported by reliable sources ↗. Wikipedia's verifiability policy ↗ requires that all content be supported by reliable sources ↗.

Replace any unreliable sources with high-quality sources. If you cannot find a reliable source for the material, it should be removed.|}}<!--
--
-->{{divbox|blue|3=Citations are in Spanish}}

'''Next steps'''

'''Need help?'''

'''Scam warning'''
Wisenerd (talk) 00:47, 31 March 2026 (UTC)</div><!--Template:AfC decline-->

{| style="margin: 0.4em 2em;"
|- style="vertical-align: top;"
| alt=Teahouse logo ↗
| <div style="background-color:#e1e6db; color: #393D38; padding: 1em; font-size: 1.1em; border-radius:10px;box-shadow:-2px -2px 1px #8e8a78;">Hello, '''Ohok12'''!
Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the '''Articles for creation help desk ↗'''. If you have any ''other'' questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the '''Teahouse ↗''', a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Wisenerd (talk) 00:47, 31 March 2026 (UTC)</div>
|}<!-- Wikipedia:Teahouse/AfC Invitation -->
Category:Wikipedians who have received a Teahouse invitation through AfC ↗

Your submission at Articles for creation ↗: Aeroflot Flight 9981 ↗ (April 11)


<div style="border: solid 1px #FCC; background-color: var(--background-color-warning-subtle, #fdf2d5); color: inherit; padding: 0.5em 1em; margin: 1.5em; width: 90%;">'''Draft declined'''{{pb}}50px|left ↗Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Your draft submission to Articles for creation ↗ has been reviewed but not accepted at this time.{{pb}}
<nowiki> </nowiki>'''Feedback'''{{pb}}The reviewer, Aviationwikiflight, left the following feedback:
{{divbox|gray|3=This draft is not adequately supported by reliable sources ↗. Wikipedia's verifiability policy ↗ requires that all content be supported by reliable sources ↗.

Replace any unreliable sources with high-quality sources. If you cannot find a reliable source for the material, it should be removed.|}}<!--
--
-->{{divbox|blue|3=Whilst this could in theory be a notable crash, in its current form, this draft cannot be moved into mainspace. The following is a non-exhaustive list of problems regarding this draft:
– The {{Slink||Lawsuit}} section is nearly entirely unsourced;
– tailstrike.com is used numerous times in this article, which appears to be an unreliable, since for one, it doesn't really cite any sources;
– I don't see anything that lends credence to sources #7 ↗, #8 ↗ (a forum...), and #9 ↗;
– None of the information given at {{Slink||Crew}} is verified in the cited source ↗;
– This source ↗ that is used does not verify any of the information that it is cited to;
– russianplanes.net is not a reliable source; etc...}}

'''Next steps'''

'''Need help?'''

'''Scam warning'''
Aviationwikiflight (talk) 21:00, 11 April 2026 (UTC)</div><!--Template:AfC decline-->

Your submission at Articles for creation ↗: UPS Airlines Flight 1307 ↗ has been accepted


<div style="border:solid 1px #57DB1E; background:var(--background-color-success-subtle, #dff2eb); padding: 0.5em 1em; color: inherit; margin: 1.5em; width: 90%;">50px|left ↗ '''UPS Airlines Flight 1307 ↗, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been accepted!'''<br />

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

'''Future articles'''
<div class="autoconfirmed-show">
<div class="unconfirmed-show">

'''Next steps'''
Thanks again, and happy editing!
'''<span style="color:#fff; background:#9400d3">nhals8</span>''' <small>(rats in the house of the dead)</small> 14:04, 18 May 2026 (UTC)</div><!--Template:AfC accept-->

Your submission at Articles for creation ↗: Malév Flight 641 ↗ has been accepted


<div style="border:solid 1px #57DB1E; background:var(--background-color-success-subtle, #dff2eb); padding: 0.5em 1em; color: inherit; margin: 1.5em; width: 90%;">50px|left ↗ '''Malév Flight 641 ↗, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been accepted!'''<br />

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions. <br />

The article has been assessed as '''C-Class''', which is recorded on its talk page ↗. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top {{AfC talk/C percentage}} of accepted submissions, well done! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme ↗ to see how you can improve the article.

'''Future articles'''
<div class="autoconfirmed-show">
<div class="unconfirmed-show">

'''Next steps'''
Thanks again, and happy editing!
Aviationwikiflight (talk) 11:58, 26 May 2026 (UTC)</div><!--Template:AfC accept-->

Your submission at Articles for creation ↗: 1980 Nouadhibou TAROM Tupolev Tu-154 Crash ↗ has been accepted


<div style="border:solid 1px #57DB1E; background:var(--background-color-success-subtle, #dff2eb); padding: 0.5em 1em; color: inherit; margin: 1.5em; width: 90%;">50px|left ↗ '''1980 Nouadhibou TAROM Tupolev Tu-154 Crash ↗, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been accepted!'''<br />

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions. <br />

The article has been assessed as '''C-Class''', which is recorded on its talk page ↗. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top {{AfC talk/C percentage}} of accepted submissions, well done! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme ↗ to see how you can improve the article.

'''Future articles'''
<div class="autoconfirmed-show">
<div class="unconfirmed-show">

'''Next steps'''
Thanks again, and happy editing!
'''<span style="color:#00508F;">Epsilon</span>.<span style="color:#E97500;">Prota</span>''' <sup><i style="color:#F01010">talk</i></sup> 16:00, 6 June 2026 (UTC)</div><!--Template:AfC accept-->

Your submission at Articles for creation ↗: LOT Polish Airlines Flight 149 ↗ has been accepted


<div style="border:solid 1px #57DB1E; background:var(--background-color-success-subtle, #dff2eb); padding: 0.5em 1em; color: inherit; margin: 1.5em; width: 90%;">50px|left ↗ '''LOT Polish Airlines Flight 149 ↗, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been accepted!'''<br />

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions. <br />

The article has been assessed as '''C-Class''', which is recorded on its talk page ↗. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top {{AfC talk/C percentage}} of accepted submissions, well done! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme ↗ to see how you can improve the article.

'''Future articles'''
<div class="autoconfirmed-show">
<div class="unconfirmed-show">

'''Next steps'''
Thanks again, and happy editing!
Zzz plant (talk) 03:41, 10 June 2026 (UTC)</div><!--Template:AfC accept-->

LOT Polish Airlines Flight 149 ↗ moved to draftspace



Thanks for your contributions to LOT Polish Airlines Flight 149 ↗. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing as a live article at this time because '''it needs more sources to establish notability'''.
I have converted it to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page ↗.
When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. TBB (talk) 07:17, 17 June 2026 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation ↗: Aviaco Flight 260 ↗ has been accepted


<div style="border:solid 1px #57DB1E; background:var(--background-color-success-subtle, #dff2eb); padding: 0.5em 1em; color: inherit; margin: 1.5em; width: 90%;">50px|left ↗ '''Aviaco Flight 260 ↗, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been accepted!'''<br />

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

'''Future articles'''
<div class="autoconfirmed-show">
<div class="unconfirmed-show">

'''Next steps'''
Thanks again, and happy editing!
ArthurTheGardener (talk) 11:51, 29 June 2026 (UTC)</div><!--Template:AfC accept-->

AfC ↗ notification: Draft:VASP Cargo Flight 780 ↗ has a new comment


<div style="border:solid 1px #9accf6;background:#f1f9ff; padding: 0.5em 1em; color: #000; margin: 1.5em; width: 90%;"> 50px|left ↗
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:VASP Cargo Flight 780 ↗. Thanks! Aviationwikiflight (talk) 06:35, 3 July 2026 (UTC) </div>

LLM PRODs



LLM prods ↗ may be only be removed after an editor {{tqq|[assumes] responsibility for the content}} which first {{tqq|requires that all content and its sources be closely reviewed, and reworked as needed, to ensure that they comply with polices and guidelines}} per the objection process ↗. This deprod ↗ did not follow the objection process as unverified information was left in the article. fifteen&nbsp;thousand&nbsp;two&nbsp;hundred&nbsp;twenty&nbsp;four ↗&nbsp;(talk) 06:29, 4 July 2026 (UTC)

:Ok, sorry about that Ohok12 (talk) 08:04, 4 July 2026 (UTC)
::And again with this deprod ↗, a spot check quickly caught {{tqq|Five people died instantly from the impact with trees. Due to extreme cold, another six people succumbed to hypothermia before rescuers arrived.}} as failing verification. I'll emphasize that ''all'' content and sources must be checked and corrected first. To that end, how did you get access to ''O rastro da bruxa: história da aviação comercial brasileira no século XX através dos seus acidentes''? fifteen&nbsp;thousand&nbsp;two&nbsp;hundred&nbsp;twenty&nbsp;four ↗&nbsp;(talk) 12:20, 4 July 2026 (UTC)
:::I recall only adding ru.airdisaster not that Brazilian reference, maybe my phone lagged. Sorry for the inconvenience. Ohok12 (talk) 12:25, 4 July 2026 (UTC)
::::That's the title of a text you would have needed to read when deprodding Real Transportes Aéreos Flight 435 ↗ earlier today. fifteen&nbsp;thousand&nbsp;two&nbsp;hundred&nbsp;twenty&nbsp;four ↗&nbsp;(talk) 12:30, 4 July 2026 (UTC)
:::::Oh yes, I saw that. I apologized for that because I forgot to delete that site, thanks for reminding me. BTW, can you checked some of my dePROD in my contribution too, I believe I may have forgot to delete unverified details, thank you. Ohok12 (talk) 12:33, 4 July 2026 (UTC)
::::::I just spot-checked Aeroflot Flight 145 ↗ after it was deprodded again and found more WP:V ↗ issues in a minute.
::::::I appreciate your interest in tying to save these pages, but I'm going to have to ask that you stop deprodding for now. I keep finding verification issues in the remaining text, this is not acceptable as per WP:LLMPRVOBJ ↗ it's required that first {{tqq|all content and its sources be closely reviewed, and reworked as needed, to ensure that they comply with polices and guidelines}}. This has failed to happen many times across many pages now, please stop. fifteen&nbsp;thousand&nbsp;two&nbsp;hundred&nbsp;twenty&nbsp;four ↗&nbsp;(talk) 13:25, 4 July 2026 (UTC)
:::::::Ok Ohok12 (talk) 13:25, 4 July 2026 (UTC)
:::::::The LLMPROD tags should probably be followed, since LLMPRVOBJ has not been followed and these articles are still LLM-generated text. {{u|Ohok12}} may not have realised that they were taking responsibility for these pages and the LLM-generated text, the de-LLMPRODDING rationale sounds more like they were thinking of either G15 or regular PROD tags. &#x2011;&#x2011;gurkubondinn 15:34, 4 July 2026 (UTC)
::::::::Ah, nevermind. I see that it's been restored in Special:Diff/1362516638 ↗ for :Malév Flight 203 ↗. Are you taking responsibility for the rest of them? Seems like at least some of them still have source integrity issues.
::::::::If you want these incidents to have articles, you are far better off by writing new articles from scratch after these have been deleted. &#x2011;&#x2011;gurkubondinn 15:39, 4 July 2026 (UTC)
:::::::::I would actually want them to be stayed. It just that most of Aeroflot crashes were being undersourced (only containing databases) due to the Soviet censorship. Ohok12 (talk) 16:32, 4 July 2026 (UTC)
::::::::::Yeah, I'm aware. There's some interesting Aeroflot (and Soviet in general) incidents and accidents. This is definitely a notable interesting topic, I just don't think we should have LLM-generated articles on them because LLM-generated text is about as credible as a mouldy carrot. &#x2011;&#x2011;gurkubondinn 20:38, 4 July 2026 (UTC)
:::::::::::Ok Ohok12 (talk) 22:42, 4 July 2026 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation ↗: Lóide Aéreo Nacional Flight 652 ↗ (July 4)


<div style="border: solid 1px #FCC; background-color: var(--background-color-warning-subtle, #fdf2d5); color: inherit; padding: 0.5em 1em; margin: 1.5em; width: 90%;">'''Draft declined'''{{pb}}50px|left ↗Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Your draft submission to Articles for creation ↗ has been reviewed but not accepted at this time.{{pb}}
<nowiki> </nowiki>'''Feedback'''{{pb}}The reviewer, Nfutvol, left the following feedback:
{{divbox|gray|3=This draft's references do not show that the event meets Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion for events ↗. The draft requires multiple published secondary ↗ sources that:

Please add references that meet ''all four'' of these criteria. If none exist, the subject is not yet suitable for Wikipedia.|}}<!--
--
-->{{divbox|blue|3=Sourcing does not demonstrate notability per the WP:NEVENT ↗ guideline. Sourcing must show lasting coverage of the event, with in-depth coverage of the event in reliable, secondary sources. Additionally, the sourcing provided includes dead links, old dates, and other indicators of possible LLM usage.}}

'''Next steps'''

'''Need help?'''

'''Scam warning'''
nf utvol (talk) 18:32, 4 July 2026 (UTC)</div><!--Template:AfC decline-->

Another article (or draft) by Global Donald that might also need re-creating



Aeroflot Flight 29674 ↗ was another draft by Global Donald that might’ve had AI used in it’s development. YokohamaVibez (talk) 16:48, 6 July 2026 (UTC)

:Oh, thanks for reminding me. Ohok12 (talk) 00:29, 7 July 2026 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation ↗: Lóide Aéreo Nacional Flight 652 ↗ (July 8)


<div style="border: solid 1px #FCC; background-color: var(--background-color-warning-subtle, #fdf2d5); color: inherit; padding: 0.5em 1em; margin: 1.5em; width: 90%;">'''Draft declined'''{{pb}}50px|left ↗Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Your draft submission to Articles for creation ↗ has been reviewed but not accepted at this time.{{pb}}
<nowiki> </nowiki>'''Feedback'''{{pb}}The reviewer, EaglesFan37, left the following feedback:
{{divbox|gray|3=This draft is not adequately supported by reliable sources ↗. Wikipedia's verifiability policy ↗ requires that all content be supported by reliable sources ↗.

Replace any unreliable sources with high-quality sources. If you cannot find a reliable source for the material, it should be removed.|}}<!--
--
-->

'''Next steps'''

'''Need help?'''

'''Scam warning'''
EaglesFan37 (talk) 01:19, 8 July 2026 (UTC)</div><!--Template:AfC decline-->