W
Active Editors
Back to Profile

User Talk: PCN02WPS

Server-side rendered snapshot of this editor's Wikipedia talk page discussions.

{{NoACEMM}}

{{archive box|search=no|

}}

Welcome to the 2026 WikiCup!



Happy New Year and Happy New WikiCup! The 2026 competition has just begun and all article creators, expanders, improvers and reviewers are welcome to take part. Even if you are a novice editor, we hope the WikiCup will give you a chance to improve your editing skills as you go. If you have already signed up, your submissions page can be found '''here ↗'''. If you have not yet signed up, you can '''add your name here ↗''', and a bot will set up your submissions page within one day, ready for you to take part. Any questions on the scoring, rules or anything else should be directed to one of the judges, or posted to the WikiCup talk page ↗.

For the 2026 WikiCup, the highest-ranking contestants will receive tournament points ↗ at the end of each round, and final rankings are decided by the number of tournament points each contestant has. This is the same scoring system that we had last year. If you're busy and can't sign up in January, don't worry: Signups are open throughout the year. To make things fairer for latecomers, the lowest-scoring contestants are no longer eliminated at the end of each round.

The first round will end on 26 February. The judges for the WikiCup this year are: {{User4|Cwmhiraeth}}, {{User4|Epicgenius}}, {{User4|Frostly}}, {{User4|Guerillero}} and {{User4|Lee Vilenski}}. Good luck! <small>If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send ↗.</small> MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:38, 1 January 2026 (UTC)
<!-- Message sent by User:Epicgenius@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send&oldid=1330482987 -->

Your nomination of 2025 NCAA Division I men's basketball championship game ↗ is under review



Your good article nomination ↗ of the article 2025 NCAA Division I men's basketball championship game ↗ is <span class="nowrap">20px|alt=|link= ↗ </span>'''under review'''. See '''Talk:2025 NCAA Division I men's basketball championship game/GA1{{!}}the review page ↗''' for more information. This may take up to 7 days; feel free to contact the reviewer with any questions you might have.<!-- Template:GANotice default --> <!-- Template:GANotice --> <small>Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Riley1012</small> -- Riley1012 (talk) 17:07, 2 January 2026 (UTC)

2026 Kentucky Wildcats baseball team



Thanks for the fixes. I actually am experimenting with putting the schedule and roster in a PostgreSQL ↗ database and the auto-generating the tables. I obviously have some work to do on the script before next season. However, while I agree with you that Kentucky's home field (Kentucky Proud Park) was overlooked, what do you think of the idea of linking it on the first mention each month, since the article is set up so the previous and future months are not shown by default, and only the current month is shown? Thanks again. rogerd (talk) 04:28, 14 January 2026 (UTC)

":United States men's national team results ↗" listed at Redirects for discussion ↗


30px ↗
The redirect <span class="plainlinks">[//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=United_States_men%27s_national_team_results&redirect=no United States men's national team results]</span> has been listed at redirects for discussion ↗ to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines ↗. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at '''{{section link|1=Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2026 January 14#United States men's national team results}}''' until a consensus is reached. <!-- Template:RFDNote --> Thryduulf (talk) 14:06, 14 January 2026 (UTC)

February 2026 GAN Backlog Drive



{| style="border: 5px solid #ABCDEF ; background-color: #FFF; padding:10px 15px 0"
|style="padding: 0; vertical-align: middle; height: 1.1em; font-size:130%" |'''Good article nominations ↗ |''' <span style="font-size:85%">February 2026 Backlog Drive</span>
|rowspan=3|right|75px ↗
|-
|'''February 2026 Backlog Drive:'''
|-
|colspan=2|'''Other ways to participate:'''
|-
|colspan=2 style="font-size:85%; padding-top:15px;"|You're receiving this message because you have conducted a good article review in the past year or participated in the previous backlog drive.
|} -- MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:00, 1 February 2026 (UTC)
<!-- Message sent by User:Sohom Datta@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Good_articles/GAN_Backlog_Drives/October_2025/Mass_message_list&oldid=1319447788 -->

Proposed deletion ↗ of :Matt Ammon ↗


left|link=|alt=Notice|48px| ↗

The article :Matt Ammon ↗ has been proposed for deletion ↗&#32;because of the following concern:
<blockquote>'''Reason: I am the article subject, and that I regard myself as a non-notable, private person, and that I want the article to be deleted. I am a private person with no significant coverage in independent, reliable sources.'''</blockquote>

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary ↗ or on the article's talk page ↗.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process ↗, but other deletion process ↗es exist. In particular, articles for deletion ↗ allows discussion to reach consensus ↗ for deletion based on established criteria ↗.

If the proposed deletion has already been carried out, you may request undeletion ↗ of the article at any time.<!-- Template:Proposed deletion notify -->

This is an automated notification. Please refer to the page's history ↗ for further information. DatBot (talk) 00:30, 7 February 2026 (UTC)

WikiCup 2026 March newsletter



The first round of the 2026 WikiCup ended on 26 February. As some of you may have noticed, good article nomination reviews ↗ now receive 10 points, an increase from 5 points in the previous year, as per a consensus at WT:CUP ↗. This point increase has been retroactively applied to all good article reviews for which competitors have claimed points in this round. Peer reviews ↗, which continue to be worth 5 points, are now listed in the same section as featured article candidate reviews ↗, rather than with good article reviews. Everyone who competed in round 1 will advance to round 2 unless they have withdrawn or been banned. No other changes to the round-point system have been made for this year.

Round 1 was competitive. Three contestants scored more than 1,000 round points, and the top 16 contestants all scored more than 300 round points. The following competitors scored more than 800 round points:


The full scores for round 1 can be seen here ↗. During this round, contestants have claimed 7 featured articles, 16 featured lists, 2 featured-topic articles, 168 good articles, 13 good-topic articles and more than 50 Did You Know articles. In addition, competitors have worked on 14 In the News ↗ articles, and they have conducted nearly 700 reviews. The tournament points table ↗ will be updated within the next few days.

Remember that any content promoted after 26 February but before the start of Round 2 can be claimed in Round 2. Invitations for collaborative writing efforts or any other discussion of potentially interesting work is always welcome on the WikiCup talk page. Remember, if two or more WikiCup competitors have done significant work on an article, all can claim points. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed ↗. If you want to help out with the WikiCup, feel free to review one of the nominations listed on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed. Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup ↗, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages. Good luck! <small>If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send ↗.</small> MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:57, 27 February 2026 (UTC)
<!-- Message sent by User:Epicgenius@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send&oldid=1340412148 -->

Your nomination of 2024–25 College Football Playoff ↗ has passed



Your good article nomination ↗ of the article 2024–25 College Football Playoff ↗ has <span class="nowrap">20px|alt=|link= ↗ </span>'''passed'''; congratulations! See '''Talk:2024–25 College Football Playoff/GA1{{!}}the review page ↗''' for more information. If the article is eligible to appear ↗ in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it ↗ within the next seven days. Please also consider reviewing ↗ somebody else's nomination to help keep the backlog down.<!-- Template:GANotice |result=pass --> <!-- Template:GANotice --> <small>Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of CosXZ</small> -- CosXZ (talk) 01:01, 25 March 2026 (UTC)

Your nomination of 2025 NCAA Division I men's basketball championship game ↗ has passed



Your good article nomination ↗ of the article 2025 NCAA Division I men's basketball championship game ↗ has <span class="nowrap">20px|alt=|link= ↗ </span>'''passed'''; congratulations! See '''Talk:2025 NCAA Division I men's basketball championship game/GA1{{!}}the review page ↗''' for more information. If the article is eligible to appear ↗ in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it ↗ within the next seven days. Please also consider reviewing ↗ somebody else's nomination to help keep the backlog down.<!-- Template:GANotice |result=pass --> <!-- Template:GANotice --> <small>Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Riley1012</small> -- Riley1012 (talk) 20:01, 25 March 2026 (UTC)

Your nomination of 2020–21 College Football Playoff ↗ is under review



Your good article nomination ↗ of the article 2020–21 College Football Playoff ↗ is <span class="nowrap">20px|alt=|link= ↗ </span>'''under review'''. See '''Talk:2020–21 College Football Playoff/GA1{{!}}the review page ↗''' for more information. This may take up to 7 days; feel free to contact the reviewer with any questions you might have.<!-- Template:GANotice default --> <!-- Template:GANotice --> <small>Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Jonathan Teagan</small> -- Jonathan Teagan (talk) 16:30, 4 April 2026 (UTC)

Your nomination of 2019–20 College Football Playoff ↗ is under review



Your good article nomination ↗ of the article 2019–20 College Football Playoff ↗ is <span class="nowrap">20px|alt=|link= ↗ </span>'''under review'''. See '''Talk:2019–20 College Football Playoff/GA1{{!}}the review page ↗''' for more information. This may take up to 7 days; feel free to contact the reviewer with any questions you might have.<!-- Template:GANotice default --> <!-- Template:GANotice --> <small>Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Jordano53</small> -- Jordano53 (talk) 22:41, 8 April 2026 (UTC)

Your nomination of 2019–20 College Football Playoff ↗ is on hold



Your good article nomination ↗ of the article 2019–20 College Football Playoff ↗ has been placed <span class="nowrap">20px|alt=|link= ↗ </span>'''on hold''', as the article needs some changes. See '''Talk:2019–20 College Football Playoff/GA1{{!}}the review page ↗''' for more information. If these are addressed within 7 days, the nomination will pass; otherwise, it may fail.<!-- Template:GANotice |result=hold --> <!-- Template:GANotice --> <small>Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Jordano53</small> -- Jordano53 (talk) 04:20, 9 April 2026 (UTC)

Your nomination of 2018 Cheez-It Bowl ↗ is under review



Your good article nomination ↗ of the article 2018 Cheez-It Bowl ↗ is <span class="nowrap">20px|alt=|link= ↗ </span>'''under review'''. See '''Talk:2018 Cheez-It Bowl/GA2{{!}}the review page ↗''' for more information. This may take up to 7 days; feel free to contact the reviewer with any questions you might have.<!-- Template:GANotice default --> <!-- Template:GANotice --> <small>Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Jordano53</small> -- Jordano53 (talk) 15:01, 10 April 2026 (UTC)

Your nomination of 2018 Cheez-It Bowl ↗ is on hold



Your good article nomination ↗ of the article 2018 Cheez-It Bowl ↗ has been placed <span class="nowrap">20px|alt=|link= ↗ </span>'''on hold''', as the article needs some changes. See '''Talk:2018 Cheez-It Bowl/GA2{{!}}the review page ↗''' for more information. If these are addressed within 7 days, the nomination will pass; otherwise, it may fail.<!-- Template:GANotice |result=hold --> <!-- Template:GANotice --> <small>Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Jordano53</small> -- Jordano53 (talk) 05:00, 12 April 2026 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Destubathon of the Americas ↗


You are invited to participate in the '''Destubathon of the Americas ↗''', a contest/editathon which will run from May 1 to May 31. The goal is to destub as many of our 475,000+ stubs for the Americas (from Alaska down to Chile) as possible. A good chance to have fun in expanding many of our old stale stubs and win up to £2000 ($2680) in Amazon vouchers for expanding stub articles. Sign up in the Contestants/participants section on the contest page if interested. Even if not interested in prizes you are still warmly welcome to participate in it as an editathon! Hopefully we can achieve something significant in the month of May together! ♦ <span style="font-variant:small-caps;color:#aba67e">''Dr. Blofeld''</span> 17:24, 15 April 2026 (UTC)

Your nomination of 2019–20 College Football Playoff ↗ has passed



Your good article nomination ↗ of the article 2019–20 College Football Playoff ↗ has <span class="nowrap">20px|alt=|link= ↗ </span>'''passed'''; congratulations! See '''Talk:2019–20 College Football Playoff/GA1{{!}}the review page ↗''' for more information. If the article is eligible to appear ↗ in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it ↗ within the next seven days. Please also consider reviewing ↗ somebody else's nomination to help keep the backlog down.<!-- Template:GANotice |result=pass --> <!-- Template:GANotice --> <small>Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Jordano53</small> -- Jordano53 (talk) 21:40, 22 April 2026 (UTC)

Your nomination of 2018 Cheez-It Bowl ↗ has passed



Your good article nomination ↗ of the article 2018 Cheez-It Bowl ↗ has <span class="nowrap">20px|alt=|link= ↗ </span>'''passed'''; congratulations! See '''Talk:2018 Cheez-It Bowl/GA2{{!}}the review page ↗''' for more information. If the article is eligible to appear ↗ in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it ↗ within the next seven days. Please also consider reviewing ↗ somebody else's nomination to help keep the backlog down.<!-- Template:GANotice |result=pass --> <!-- Template:GANotice --> <small>Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Jordano53</small> -- Jordano53 (talk) 15:00, 23 April 2026 (UTC)

WikiCup 2026 May newsletter



The second round of the 2026 WikiCup ended on 28 April. As a reminder for contestants who just joined or are unaware of recent changes to our round-points system, good article nomination reviews ↗ now receive 10 points, an increase from 5 points in the previous year, as per a consensus at WT:CUP ↗. Peer reviews ↗, which continue to be worth 5 points, are now listed in the same section as featured article candidate reviews ↗, rather than with good article reviews. Everyone who competed in round 2 will advance to round 3 unless they have withdrawn or been banned. No other changes to the round-point system have been made for this year.

Round 2 was competitive. Three contestants scored more than 1,000 round points; nine scored over 500; and fourteen scored over 300. The top seven contestants had at least one featured article ↗ (two of them with two apiece). The following competitors scored more than 800 round points:


The full scores for round 2 can be seen here ↗. During this round, contestants have claimed 12 featured articles, 13 featured lists, 2 featured-topic articles, 106 good articles, 22 good-topic articles and more than 40 Did You Know articles. In addition, competitors have worked on 3 In the News ↗ articles, and they have conducted over 200 reviews. The tournament points table ↗ has been updated.

Remember that any content promoted after 28 April but before the start of Round 3 can be claimed in Round 3. Invitations for collaborative writing efforts or any other discussion of potentially interesting work is always welcome on the WikiCup talk page. Remember, if two or more WikiCup competitors have done significant work on an article, all can claim points. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed ↗. If you want to help out with the WikiCup, feel free to review one of the nominations listed on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed. Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup ↗, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages. Good luck! <small>If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send ↗.</small> MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:49, 29 April 2026 (UTC)
<!-- Message sent by User:Epicgenius@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send&oldid=1351688849 -->

Your nomination of 2020–21 College Football Playoff ↗ is under review



Your good article nomination ↗ of the article 2020–21 College Football Playoff ↗ is <span class="nowrap">20px|alt=|link= ↗ </span>'''under review'''. See '''Talk:2020–21 College Football Playoff/GA2{{!}}the review page ↗''' for more information. This may take up to 7 days; feel free to contact the reviewer with any questions you might have.<!-- Template:GANotice default --> <!-- Template:GANotice --> <small>Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of ZooBlazer</small> -- ZooBlazer (talk) 23:20, 29 April 2026 (UTC)

ITN recognition for Kyle Busch ↗



{{ivmbox
|1=On 22 May 2026, '''''In the news ↗''''' was updated with an item that involved the article '''''Kyle Busch ↗''''', which you nominated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page ↗. Black Kite (talk) ↗ 21:48, 22 May 2026 (UTC)
|2={{Ambox globe current red}}
|imagesize=50px
}}<!-- Template:ITN notice -->

June 2026 GAN Backlog Drive



{| style="border: 5px solid #ABCDEF ; background-color: #FFF; padding:10px 15px 0; color: black"
|style="padding: 0; vertical-align: middle; height: 1.1em; font-size:130%" |'''Good article nominations ↗ |''' <span style="font-size:85%">June 2026 Backlog Drive</span>
|rowspan=3|right|75px ↗
|-
|'''June 2026 Backlog Drive:'''
Do you want to become more experienced in the GA process?
Interested in taking part? You can '''sign up here ↗'''.
|-
|colspan=2|'''Other ways to participate:'''
|-
|colspan=2 style="font-size:85%; padding-top:15px;"|You're receiving this message because you have participated in a good article review this year or participated in the previous backlog drive.
|}

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:59, 25 May 2026 (UTC)
<!-- Message sent by User:TechnoSquirrel69@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Good_articles/GAN_Backlog_Drives/June_2026/Mass_message_list&oldid=1356124266 -->

A bowl of strawberries for you!



{| style="background-color: var(--background-color-success-subtle, #fdffe7); border: 1px solid var(--border-color-success, #fceb92); color: var(--color-base, #202122);"
|style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 5px;" | 120px ↗
|style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;" | Good to see you're well! We haven't interacted in a while, but if you nominate any more Centre presidents, just ping me and I'll be happy to review :) IAWW (talk) 19:14, 28 May 2026 (UTC)
|}

Your nomination of 2020–21 College Football Playoff ↗ is on hold



Your good article nomination ↗ of the article 2020–21 College Football Playoff ↗ has been placed <span class="nowrap">20px|alt=|link= ↗ </span>'''on hold''', as the article needs some changes. See '''Talk:2020–21 College Football Playoff/GA2{{!}}the review page ↗''' for more information. If these are addressed within 7 days, the nomination will pass; otherwise, it may fail.<!-- Template:GANotice |result=hold --> <!-- Template:GANotice --> <small>Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of ZooBlazer</small> -- ZooBlazer (talk) 01:40, 16 June 2026 (UTC)

Your nomination of 2020–21 College Football Playoff ↗ has failed



Your good article nomination ↗ of the article 2020–21 College Football Playoff ↗ has <span class="nowrap">20px|alt=|link= ↗ </span>'''failed'''. See '''Talk:2020–21 College Football Playoff/GA2{{!}}the review page ↗''' for more information. If or when the reviewer's feedback has been addressed, you may nominate the article again.<!-- Template:GANotice |result=fail --> <!-- Template:GANotice --> <small>Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of ZooBlazer</small> -- ZooBlazer (talk) 17:40, 24 June 2026 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 28



An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2026 South Carolina elections ↗, a link pointing to the disambiguation page WRDW ↗ was added.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 21:55, 28 June 2026 (UTC)

WikiCup 2026 July newsletter



The third round of the 2026 WikiCup ended on 28 June at 23:59 (UTC). As a reminder, good article nomination reviews ↗ now receive 10 points, while peer reviews ↗, which continue to be worth 5 points, are now listed in the same section as featured article candidate reviews ↗, rather than with good article reviews. Everyone who competed in round 3 will advance to round 4 unless they have withdrawn or been banned. No other changes to the round-point system have been made for this year.

Round 3 was competitive. Three contestants scored more than 1,000 round points; eight scored over 500; and thirteen scored over 300. The top three contestants had at least one featured article ↗ (two of them with two apiece). The following competitors scored more than 800 round points:


The full scores for round 3 can be seen here ↗. During this round, contestants have claimed 12 featured articles, 12 featured lists, 7 featured-topic articles, 117 good articles, 74 good-topic articles and more than 30 Did You Know articles. In addition, competitors have worked on 13 In the News ↗ articles, and they have conducted nearly 180 reviews. The tournament points table ↗ has been updated.

Remember that any content promoted after 28 June but before the start of Round 4 can be claimed in Round 4. Invitations for collaborative writing efforts or any other discussion of potentially interesting work is always welcome on the WikiCup talk page. Remember, if two or more WikiCup competitors have done significant work on an article, all can claim points. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed ↗. If you want to help out with the WikiCup, feel free to review one of the nominations listed on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed. Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup ↗, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages. Good luck! <small>If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send ↗.</small> MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:49, 29 June 2026 (UTC)
<!-- Message sent by User:Epicgenius@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send&oldid=1361686567 -->