User Talk: ZooBlazer
Server-side rendered snapshot of this editor's Wikipedia talk page discussions.
{{User:MiszaBot/config
|archiveheader = {{talk archive navigation}}
|maxarchivesize = 999K
|counter = 19
|minthreadsleft = 1
|minthreadstoarchive = 1
|algo = old(30d)
|archive = User talk:ZooBlazer/Archive %(counter)d
}}
{{archives
| auto = no
| search = <!-- yes/no -->
| collapsible = <!-- yes/no -->
| collapsed = <!-- yes/no -->
| style = width:10em;
| title = Archives
| image =
| alt =
| link =
| target =
| bot = MiszaBot
| age = 30
| units = days
| list = <center>2008 ↗</center>
<center>2009 ↗</center>
<center>2010 ↗</center>
<center>2011 ↗</center>
<center>2012 ↗</center>
<center>2013 ↗</center>
<center>2014 ↗</center>
<center>2015 ↗</center>
<center>2016 ↗</center>
<center>2017 ↗</center>
<center>2018 ↗</center>
<center>2019 ↗</center>
<center>2020 ↗</center>
<center>2021 ↗</center>
<center>2022 ↗</center>
<center>2023 ↗</center>
<center>2024 ↗</center>
<center>2025 ↗</center>
<center>2026 ↗</center>
}}
Four Award
{| style="border: 1px solid gray; background-color: #fdffe7;"
|rowspan="2" style="vertical-align:middle;" |
100px ↗
|rowspan="2" |
|style="font-size: x-large; padding: 0; vertical-align: middle; height: 1.1em;" | '''Four Award'''
|-
|style="vertical-align: middle; border-top: 1px solid gray;" | Congratulations! You have been awarded the Four Award ↗ for your work from beginning to end on '''Horizon Zero Dawn: The Frozen Wilds{{!}}''Horizon Zero Dawn: The Frozen Wilds'' ↗'''. <span class="nowrap">—<span style="color: #0b541f;">'''TechnoSquirrel69'''</span></span> <small>(<span style="color: #0b541f;">'''talk'''</span>)</small> 20:40, 27 June 2026 (UTC)
|}
Promotion of Horizon Zero Dawn: The Frozen Wilds ↗
{{ivmbox
|image = Cscr-featured.svg
|imagesize=60px
|extracss=font-size:1.25em; font-family:Georgia;
|text = Congratulations, ZooBlazer! The article you nominated, '''Horizon Zero Dawn: The Frozen Wilds ↗''', has been promoted to featured status, recognizing it as one of the best articles on Wikipedia. The '''nomination discussion ↗''' has been archived.{{parabr}}This is a rare accomplishment and you should be proud. If you would like, you may nominate it ↗ to appear on the Main Page as Today's featured article. Keep up the great work! Cheers, {{user0|Gog the Mild}} via FACBot (talk) 23:06, 27 June 2026 (UTC)
}}<!-- Template:FC pass talk message -->
WikiCup 2026 July newsletter
The third round of the 2026 WikiCup ended on 28 June at 23:59 (UTC). As a reminder, good article nomination reviews ↗ now receive 10 points, while peer reviews ↗, which continue to be worth 5 points, are now listed in the same section as featured article candidate reviews ↗, rather than with good article reviews. Everyone who competed in round 3 will advance to round 4 unless they have withdrawn or been banned. No other changes to the round-point system have been made for this year.
Round 3 was competitive. Three contestants scored more than 1,000 round points; eight scored over 500; and thirteen scored over 300. The top three contestants had at least one featured article ↗ (two of them with two apiece). The following competitors scored more than 800 round points:
- {{Wikipedia:WikiCup/Participant17|MCE89}} with 1567 points, mainly from good and featured articles about Australian people and geography, as well as some article reviews
- {{Wikipedia:WikiCup/Participant17|Bgsu98}} with 1547 points, mainly from good articles, featured articles, featured lists, and a good topic about figure skating, along with 20 article reviews
- {{Wikipedia:WikiCup/Participant17|Reconrabbit}} with 1004 points, mainly from a high-multiplier featured article on European rabbit ↗ and several good articles, DYKs, and reviews
- {{Wikipedia:WikiCup/Participant17|A.Cython}} with 1004 points, mainly from good articles about warfare, along with 22 article reviews
- {{Wikipedia:WikiCup/Participant17|Generalissima}} with 859 points, mainly from good and featured articles about rivers and East Asian topics
The full scores for round 3 can be seen here ↗. During this round, contestants have claimed 12 featured articles, 12 featured lists, 7 featured-topic articles, 117 good articles, 74 good-topic articles and more than 30 Did You Know articles. In addition, competitors have worked on 13 In the News ↗ articles, and they have conducted nearly 180 reviews. The tournament points table ↗ has been updated.
Remember that any content promoted after 28 June but before the start of Round 4 can be claimed in Round 4. Invitations for collaborative writing efforts or any other discussion of potentially interesting work is always welcome on the WikiCup talk page. Remember, if two or more WikiCup competitors have done significant work on an article, all can claim points. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed ↗. If you want to help out with the WikiCup, feel free to review one of the nominations listed on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed. Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup ↗, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages. Good luck! <small>If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send ↗.</small> MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:49, 29 June 2026 (UTC)
<!-- Message sent by User:Epicgenius@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send&oldid=1361686567 -->
FA review of Agnosticism ↗
Hello {{u|ZooBlazer}} and congratulations on getting Horizon Zero Dawn: The Frozen Wilds ↗ to FA status! I was wondering whether you may be interested in reviewing the article Agnosticism ↗ at Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Agnosticism/archive1 ↗ since the article hasn't received enough reviews so far. Thank you for taking a look and please feel under no obligation if now is not a good time. Phlsph7 (talk) 08:45, 2 July 2026 (UTC)
:@Phlsph7 Sure, I can take a look at it soon. I also have a current FAC nomination ↗ if you have any interest in leaving any comments. -- <span style="border:1px solid #F00;border-radius:9px;padding:2px 4px;text-shadow:0 0 4px #F00;font-family:Arial"><span style="color:#000">Zoo</span><b style="color:#000">Blazer</b></span> 16:35, 2 July 2026 (UTC)
::Thanks! I see your Horizon article series continues. I'll have a look when I get the time. Phlsph7 (talk) 16:45, 2 July 2026 (UTC)
''Good Article Gazette'', Issue 16
center|Logo: Good Article Gazette - the official GAN newsletter ↗
{{center|1={{big|1=Issue 16, 7 July 2026}}}}
{| style="margin:0 2em"
|-
!style="text-align:left"|Ongoing discussions!!style="text-align:left"|News!!style="text-align:left"|Current statistics
|-
| style="vertical-align:top" |
| style="vertical-align:top" |
- The 100th GA Review Circle begins ↗
- The June Backlog Drive ↗ concludes.
- Kiddush levana ↗ hits the 1.5 year mark in the queue.
- '''Number of GAs:''' 44,338 (+423)
- '''Number of nominations:''' 906 (-127)
- '''GAs for reassessment:''' 34 (-8)
{{hlist|class=center|Subscribe to the newsletter ↗|Review an article! ↗|Participate in review circles ↗|Acquire a mentor ↗}}
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:23, 7 July 2026 (UTC)
<!-- Message sent by User:TechnoSquirrel69@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Good_Article_Gazette/Mailing_list&oldid=1362586078 -->