User Talk: Pindrice
Server-side rendered snapshot of this editor's Wikipedia talk page discussions.
ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
<div class="ivmbox " style="margin-bottom: 1em; border: 1px solid #AAA; background-color: ivory; padding: 0.5em; display: flex; align-items: center; ">
<div class="ivmbox-image" style="padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em; flex: 1 0 40px; max-width: 100px">40px ↗</div>
<div class="ivmbox-text">
Hello! Voting in the '''2023 Arbitration Committee elections ↗''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2023|end}}-1 day}}. All '''eligible users ↗''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee ↗ is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process ↗. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans ↗, topic bans ↗, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy ↗ describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates ↗ and submit your choices on the '''2023|poll}}|voting page ↗'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. <small>MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:56, 28 November 2023 (UTC)</small>
</div>
</div>
<!-- Message sent by User:Illusion Flame@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2023/Coordination/MM/08&oldid=1187132475 -->
Two Nzoyikorera
I just wanted to apologize for the confusion regarding Nzoyikorera. yes there are two women named Nzoyikorera in the squad, I meant to say that Roy Nzoyikorera scored all the goals according to the match report. I deeply apologize for the oversight & confusion caused and hope you understand.
Handball
Hey, thanks for fixing. 382 would be crazy. :D At some point i made a number too much and never checked, sorry for that and thanks again. Kante4 (talk) 12:06, 4 August 2024 (UTC)
:That would be insane ^^ even in the Olympics ^^ Thanks Pindrice (talk) 12:08, 4 August 2024 (UTC)
Uefa U17 and U19
Hi, regarding your revert of my edit: if you read this article at the UEFA site:
https://www.uefa.com/under17/news/0285-191289ee1ce4-ff8d3b82e87e-1000--new-u17-euro-format-from-2024-25-and-u19-euro-format-from-20/
you will see how exactly U17 qualifying will from now be connected to U19 qualifying of 2 years later (which actually makes sense, because the same players become 2 years older). SomeBody1971 (talk) 16:51, 24 October 2024 (UTC)
ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message
<div class="ivmbox " style="margin-bottom: 1em; border: 1px solid #a2a9b1; background-color: #fdf2d5; padding: 0.5em; display: flex; align-items: center; ">
<div class="ivmbox-image noresize" style="padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em;">40px ↗</div>
<div class="ivmbox-text">
Hello! Voting in the '''2024 Arbitration Committee elections ↗''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2024|end}}-1 day}}. All '''eligible users ↗''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee ↗ is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process ↗. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans ↗, topic bans ↗, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy ↗ describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates ↗ and submit your choices on the '''2024|poll}}|voting page ↗'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. <small>MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:45, 19 November 2024 (UTC)</small>
</div>
</div>
<!-- Message sent by User:Cyberpower678@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2024/Coordination/MM/07&oldid=1258243692 -->
ArbCom 2025 Elections voter message
<div class="ivmbox " style="margin-bottom: 1em; border: 1px solid #a2a9b1; background-color: #fdf2d5; padding: 0.5em; display: flex; align-items: center; ">
<div class="ivmbox-image" style="padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em;flex-basis: 40px">40px ↗</div>
<div class="ivmbox-text">
Hello! Voting in the '''2025 Arbitration Committee elections ↗''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2025|end}}-1 day}}. All '''eligible users ↗''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee ↗ is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process ↗. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans ↗, topic bans ↗, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy ↗ describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please review the candidates ↗ and submit your choices on the '''2025|poll}}|voting page ↗'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. <small>MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:56, 18 November 2025 (UTC)</small>
</div>
</div>
<!-- Message sent by User:Cyberpower678@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2025/Coordination/MM/07&oldid=1322758895 -->
Puerto Rico v Bonaire: 5–0
The match between Puerto Rico and Bonaire at the 2026 CONCACAF U-20 Championship qualifying ↗ concluded with a 5–0 scoreline. The CONCACAF website initially listed the result as 4–0 '''in error''', but this was later corrected (see the official report here ↗). Please also refer to the relevant talk page discussion ↗. Reverting the edit without providing a source was not appropriate. Lunar Spectrum96 (talk) 16:38, 26 February 2026 (UTC)
:Dear @Lunar Spectrum96, my source in the official CONCACAF website and the standings : here ↗ : please explain to me why Puerto Rico is at 6 goals for and Bonaire is at 7 goals against : please explain me that because you said it was corrected but on the official wbesite and it is like this and I think the standings on the official website are pretty accurate ... Pindrice (talk) 18:50, 26 February 2026 (UTC)
::What's more : below the table on the wiki page we say : source CONCACAF : so we must follow what CONCACAF says, otherwise change the name of the source ... Pindrice (talk) 18:54, 26 February 2026 (UTC)
:::So please next time, don't come to my talk page and lecture me when I strictly follow the source that is BELLOW the table that is entitled to ! Pindrice (talk) 19:08, 26 February 2026 (UTC)
::::Dear @Pindrice, '''I apologize''' if my previous message came across as harsh or lecturing, that wasn't my intention. I was simply trying to point out a discrepancy.
::::The standings on the official CONCACAF website are generated from the match data entered into their system, and in this case the individual match result appears to have been input incorrectly at first. However, the official CONCACAF live stream, the match report published on their website, as well as confirmations from both the Puerto Rico and Bonaire's federations, indicate that the correct final score was 5–0.
::::I completely understand your point about following the stated source below the table, and I appreciate that you were doing exactly that. I just wanted to clarify why the 5–0 scoreline was used.
::::'''Sorry again''' for any misunderstanding. Lunar Spectrum96 (talk) 19:18, 26 February 2026 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for March 6
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2027 FIFA Women's World Cup qualification (inter-confederation play-offs) ↗, a link pointing to the disambiguation page CAF ↗ was added.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 21:50, 6 March 2026 (UTC)
2029 FIFA Club World Cup - qualification - as at April 2026
As one of the main editors at 2029 FIFA Club World Cup ↗, please be advised that the while qualification section has been WP:FORK ↗ed out, and sent to Draftspace, on the basis of accusations of WP:CRYSTAL ↗ and WP:OR ↗. The qualification article, in similar format to that used in 2025, is currently at '''Draft:2029 FIFA Club World Cup qualification ↗''', pending some official announcements from FIFA. <b style="white-space:nowrap;text-shadow:#500 0em 0em 0.7em,#ddd -0.2em -0.2em 0.7em,#bbb 0.2em 0.2em 0.7em;color:#500">Matilda <sup>talk ↗</sup></b> 12:07, 22 April 2026 (UTC)
June 2026
<s>25px|alt=Information icon ↗ Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at :2026–27 UEFA Women's Champions League ↗. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism ↗ and have been reverted ↗. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges ↗. ''As BK Häcken ↗ is the winners of 2025 Damallsvenskan ↗, they qualified for the 2026–27 UWCL. This fact is already confirmed and cannot be challenged. What you said "what would you put if Häcken finished 4th or lower?" is violating the fact.''<!-- Template:uw-vandalism2 --> KyleRGiggs (talk) 04:12, 2 June 2026 (UTC)</s>
::Hi @KyleRGiggs, you seem to be very confuse because I have never reverted your edits EVER ! Please check the view/edits history : it's the user SocietyBox that has reverted your edits on 30 May 09h43. I have not done anything against you so please delete this message and you own me apologies for false accusations !!! And please : let me be out of your feud with this other user !
::@KyleRGiggs, because since days, you are reverting each other edits with the user SocietyBox, I am just a spectator and I am minding my own business and now you come to my page you accuse me with false accusations ? You got some nerve ! I didn't do anything ! Pindrice (talk) 05:24, 2 June 2026 (UTC)
:::Oops sorry. KyleRGiggs (talk) 06:58, 4 June 2026 (UTC)
::::::Hi @KyleRGiggs, thank you. Please sort this out between yourselves and leave me out of it, if you don’t mind. Thank you in advance.
::::Pindrice (talk) 12:24, 5 June 2026 (UTC)
Club ranking updates during qualifying / play-off rounds
Hi @pindrice - I was planning on updating the date in the club rankings only after each qualifying round, since only Benfica or Atalanta can possibly have any changes prior to League phase and no other teams will enter the Top 25 before League phase. But feel free to update the dates on matchdays if you like, it's technically correct. Cheers. ThatStatMan (talk) 16:52, 9 July 2026 (UTC)
:Hi @ThatStatMan, thank you for your message. Usually in the past when you edited the date for the "Men's association coefficient" section you also edited the date for the "Men's club coefficient" section (in order to have both dates on the same day), so I thought you just forgot this time and that's why I edited it for you but apparently it was planned. So anyway ^^' do as you want ! Pindrice (talk) 12:24, 10 July 2026 (UTC)
::Thank you for telling me ! Pindrice (talk) 12:25, 10 July 2026 (UTC)