User Talk: RickStrate2029
Server-side rendered snapshot of this editor's Wikipedia talk page discussions.
Welcome!
Hi RickStrate2029! I noticed your contributions ↗ and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.
As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:
{{Clickable button 2|Help:Introduction|Learn more about editing|class=mw-ui-progressive|style=margin-left: 1.6em;}}
Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia ↗ page covers the same topics.
If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:
{{Clickable button 2|Wikipedia:Teahouse|Get help at the Teahouse|style=margin-left: 1.6em;}}
If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:
{{Clickable button 2|Wikipedia:Task Center|Volunteer at the Task Center|style=margin-left: 1.6em;}}
Happy editing! <!-- Template:Welcome--> Shirt58 (talk) 🦘 08:41, 10 November 2023 (UTC)
CS1 error on 2024 Democratic Party presidential primaries ↗
25px|alt=|link= ↗ Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have '''automatically detected''' that this edit ↗ performed by you, on the page :2024 Democratic Party presidential primaries ↗, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:
- A "bare URL ↗ and missing title ↗" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. ([//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=2024_Democratic_Party_presidential_primaries&action=edit&minor=minor&summary=Fixing+reference+error+raised+by+%5B%5BUser%3AQwerfjkl%20(bot)%7CQwerfjkl%20(bot)%5D%5D Fix] | [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Help_desk&action=edit§ion=new&preload=User:Qwerfjkl%20(bot)/helpform&preloadtitle=Referencing%20errors%20on%20%5B%5BSpecial%3ADiff%2F1197602619%7C2024%20Democratic%20Party%20presidential%20primaries%5D%5D Ask for help])
Thanks, <!-- User:Qwerfjkl (bot)/inform -->Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 05:57, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
Edits must include a supporting citation
Your edit to the 2024 United States Senate election in Michigan ↗ article was reverted because your edit regarding Justin Amash ↗ being a potential third party candidate was reverted because there is no citation from a journalistic source or from the Libertarian Party web site to support your edit. Please include a supporting citation that is NOT from Amash himself to support your edit. Steelbeard1 (talk) 20:43, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
:There is no need for a citation besides the one I included. Amash is a Libertarian party member considering a run for the Senate, he's said he's considering running in the Republican primary, but because he's a Libertarian it's absolutely logical to assume that's a possible route he could take. RickStrate2029 (talk) 01:41, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
::This explanation is a good example of original research ↗, which is not allowed on Wikipedia. A logical assumption is not enough to include something, it must be directly supported by a reliable source. This policy has been in place for over 2 decades and is one of Wikipedia's core content policies ↗. Jamedeus (talk) 07:44, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
:::Ah, fair enough. I won't re-add that section into the page unless further information compels me to. RickStrate2029 (talk) 05:24, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
CS1 error on Cornel West 2024 presidential campaign ↗
25px|alt=|link= ↗ Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have '''automatically detected''' that this edit ↗ performed by you, on the page :Cornel West 2024 presidential campaign ↗, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:
- A "bare URL ↗ and missing title ↗" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. ([//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Cornel_West_2024_presidential_campaign&action=edit&minor=minor&summary=Fixing+reference+error+raised+by+%5B%5BUser%3AQwerfjkl%20(bot)%7CQwerfjkl%20(bot)%5D%5D Fix] | [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Help_desk&action=edit§ion=new&preload=User:Qwerfjkl%20(bot)/helpform&preloadtitle=Referencing%20errors%20on%20%5B%5BSpecial%3ADiff%2F1202106945%7CCornel%20West%202024%20presidential%20campaign%5D%5D Ask for help])
Thanks, <!-- User:Qwerfjkl (bot)/inform -->Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 02:14, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
I have sent you a note about a page you started
Hello, RickStrate2029. Thank you for your work on AstroForge ↗. North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process ↗, had the following comments:
{{Bq|1=Good start}}
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{code|<nowiki>{{Re|</nowiki>North8000<nowiki>}}</nowiki>}}. Please remember to sign your reply with {{code|<nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>}}. <small>(Message delivered via the Page Curation ↗ tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)</small><!-- Template:Sentnote-NPF -->
<b style="color: #0000cc;">''North8000''</b> (talk) 20:48, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
CS1 error on 2024 Democratic Party presidential primaries ↗
25px|alt=|link= ↗ Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have '''automatically detected''' that this edit ↗ performed by you, on the page :2024 Democratic Party presidential primaries ↗, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:
- A "bare URL ↗ and missing title ↗" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. ([//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=2024_Democratic_Party_presidential_primaries&action=edit&minor=minor&summary=Fixing+reference+error+raised+by+%5B%5BUser%3AQwerfjkl%20(bot)%7CQwerfjkl%20(bot)%5D%5D Fix] | [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Help_desk&action=edit§ion=new&preload=User:Qwerfjkl%20(bot)/helpform&preloadtitle=Referencing%20errors%20on%20%5B%5BSpecial%3ADiff%2F1210906042%7C2024%20Democratic%20Party%20presidential%20primaries%5D%5D Ask for help])
Thanks, <!-- User:Qwerfjkl (bot)/inform -->Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 22:49, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
February 2024
25px|alt=Information icon ↗ Hello, I'm Jamedeus. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, :2024 Democratic Party presidential primaries ↗, but you didn't provide a reliable source ↗. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation ↗ and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners ↗. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. ''Your edit summary says the Philips endorsement is in the video, but the video does not even mention Philips.'' <!-- Template:uw-unsourced1 --> Jamedeus (talk) 00:50, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
May 2024
30px|link= ↗ You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war ↗  according to the reverts you have made on :2024 Democratic Party presidential primaries ↗. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate ↗ with others, to avoid editing disruptively ↗, and to try to reach a consensus ↗, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Points to note:
# '''Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;'''
# '''Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.'''
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page ↗ to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard ↗ or seek dispute resolution ↗. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection ↗. If you engage in an edit war, you '''may be blocked ↗ from editing.''' <!-- Template:uw-ew --> – Muboshgu (talk) 19:14, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
:I am not the perpetrator of the "edit war", the person reverting my changes is. We've discussed the change in detail in the talk page and have reached a majority consensus, but my changes keep being reverted. I am unsure how to proceed beyond what I'm doing now. RickStrate2029 (talk) 17:38, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
::Nobody is "innocent" in an edit war. If someone is edit warring against consensus, let them dig their own grave. If you violate 3RR in restoring the consensus, you still get blocked too. – Muboshgu (talk) 17:54, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
:::Out of curiosity, do you know if the other individual involved in the edit war has been contacted with this same warning? RickStrate2029 (talk) 17:58, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
::::I do not believe so. That's on me as I should have warned you both. – Muboshgu (talk) 18:16, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
<div class="user-block uw-block" style="padding: 5px; margin-bottom: 0.5em; border: 1px solid #a9a9a9; background-color: #ffefd5; min-height: 40px">40px|left|alt=Stop icon with clock ↗<div style="margin-left:45px">You have been '''blocked ↗''' from editing for a period of '''72 hours''' for edit warring ↗ and violating the three-revert rule ↗, as you did at :2024 Democratic Party presidential primaries ↗. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions ↗. </div><div style="margin-left:45px">During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes ↗ and seek consensus ↗. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution ↗, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection ↗.</div><div style="margin-left:45px">If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks ↗, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. --><code><nowiki>{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}</nowiki></code>. – Muboshgu (talk) 18:57, 23 May 2024 (UTC)</div></div><!-- Template:uw-3block -->
:In spite of my warning you, you've kept edit warring. You have violated WP:3RR ↗. I don't see anyone else currently in violation of it. – Muboshgu (talk) 18:58, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
::If you look in the edit history and the talk page you'll clearly see the other side of the edit warring and the consensus reached on the subject. I'm unclear on why I'm the only side being reprimanded. RickStrate2029 (talk) 19:14, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
:::Because, at that point, you were the only one who was edit warring. – Muboshgu (talk) 20:49, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
::::What about the person reverting my edits? RickStrate2029 (talk) 21:24, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
:::::They stopped. – Muboshgu (talk) 21:31, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
:::Can you please point to the discussion where the consensus was reached? Esolo5002 (talk) 21:09, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
::::Look to the talk page at any of the sections titled "Dean Phillips", the majority consensus is obviously in favor of his inclusion in the infobox. Just look. RickStrate2029 (talk) 21:23, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
August 2024
25px|alt=Information icon ↗ Hello, I'm The Herald. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, :Voyager 1 ↗, but you didn't provide a reliable source ↗. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation ↗ and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners ↗. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. <!-- Template:uw-unsourced1 --> The Herald (Benison) (talk) 02:25, 4 August 2024 (UTC)
:My bad, I had a citation with it but must've forgotten to include it, I will do so. RickStrate2029 (talk) 03:18, 4 August 2024 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for August 15
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of Donald Trump 2024 presidential campaign endorsements ↗, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Democratic ↗. Such links are usually incorrect ↗, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. <small>(Read the FAQ{{*}} Join us at the DPL WikiProject ↗.)</small>
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 07:57, 15 August 2024 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for September 5
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2024 United States Senate election in Montana ↗, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tesla ↗.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:55, 5 September 2024 (UTC)
CS1 error on 2024 United States House of Representatives elections in Ohio ↗
25px|alt=|link= ↗ Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have '''automatically detected''' that this edit ↗ performed by you, on the page :2024 United States House of Representatives elections in Ohio ↗, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:
- A bare URL ↗ error. References show this error when one of the URL-containing parameters cannot be paired with an associated title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. ([//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=2024_United_States_House_of_Representatives_elections_in_Ohio&action=edit&minor=minor&summary=Fixing+reference+error+raised+by+%5B%5BUser%3AQwerfjkl%20(bot)%7CQwerfjkl%20(bot)%5D%5D Fix] | [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Help_desk&action=edit§ion=new&preload=User:Qwerfjkl%20(bot)/helpform&preloadtitle=Referencing%20errors%20on%20%5B%5BSpecial%3ADiff%2F1251935342%7C2024%20United%20States%20House%20of%20Representatives%20elections%20in%20Ohio%5D%5D Ask for help])
Thanks, <!-- User:Qwerfjkl (bot)/inform -->Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 22:43, 18 October 2024 (UTC)
CS1 error on 2024 United States Senate election in Nebraska ↗
25px|alt=|link= ↗ Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have '''automatically detected''' that this edit ↗ performed by you, on the page :2024 United States Senate election in Nebraska ↗, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:
- A bare URL ↗ error. References show this error when one of the URL-containing parameters cannot be paired with an associated title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. ([//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=2024_United_States_Senate_election_in_Nebraska&action=edit&minor=minor&summary=Fixing+reference+error+raised+by+%5B%5BUser%3AQwerfjkl%20(bot)%7CQwerfjkl%20(bot)%5D%5D Fix] | [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Help_desk&action=edit§ion=new&preload=User:Qwerfjkl%20(bot)/helpform&preloadtitle=Referencing%20errors%20on%20%5B%5BSpecial%3ADiff%2F1252812179%7C2024%20United%20States%20Senate%20election%20in%20Nebraska%5D%5D Ask for help])
Thanks, <!-- User:Qwerfjkl (bot)/inform -->Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 01:48, 23 October 2024 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for October 23
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2024 United States Senate election in Nebraska ↗, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Forward Party ↗.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:54, 23 October 2024 (UTC)
ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message
<div class="ivmbox " style="margin-bottom: 1em; border: 1px solid #a2a9b1; background-color: #fdf2d5; padding: 0.5em; display: flex; align-items: center; ">
<div class="ivmbox-image noresize" style="padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em;">40px ↗</div>
<div class="ivmbox-text">
Hello! Voting in the '''2024 Arbitration Committee elections ↗''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2024|end}}-1 day}}. All '''eligible users ↗''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee ↗ is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process ↗. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans ↗, topic bans ↗, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy ↗ describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates ↗ and submit your choices on the '''2024|poll}}|voting page ↗'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. <small>MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:53, 19 November 2024 (UTC)</small>
</div>
</div>
<!-- Message sent by User:Cyberpower678@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2024/Coordination/MM/09&oldid=1258243804 -->
Disambiguation link notification for February 5
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Elon Musk ↗, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Independent ↗.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:56, 5 February 2025 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for April 2
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Elon Musk ↗, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Independent ↗.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:56, 2 April 2025 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for May 30
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2025 New York City mayoral election ↗, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Independent ↗.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:01, 30 May 2025 (UTC)
CS1 error on 2025 New York City mayoral election ↗
25px|alt=|link= ↗ Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have '''automatically detected''' that this edit ↗ performed by you, on the page :2025 New York City mayoral election ↗, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:
- A bare URL ↗ error. References show this error when one of the URL-containing parameters cannot be paired with an associated title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. ([//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=2025_New_York_City_mayoral_election&action=edit&minor=minor&summary=Fixing+reference+error+raised+by+%5B%5BUser%3AQwerfjkl%20(bot)%7CQwerfjkl%20(bot)%5D%5D Fix] | [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Help_desk&action=edit§ion=new&preload=User:Qwerfjkl%20(bot)/helpform&preloadtitle=Referencing%20errors%20on%20%5B%5BSpecial%3ADiff%2F1298538879%7C2025%20New%20York%20City%20mayoral%20election%5D%5D Ask for help])
Thanks, <!-- User:Qwerfjkl (bot)/inform -->Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 04:20, 3 July 2025 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for November 2
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2025 New York City mayoral election ↗, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Forward Party ↗.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:59, 2 November 2025 (UTC)
ArbCom 2025 Elections voter message
<div class="ivmbox " style="margin-bottom: 1em; border: 1px solid #a2a9b1; background-color: #fdf2d5; padding: 0.5em; display: flex; align-items: center; ">
<div class="ivmbox-image" style="padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em;flex-basis: 40px">40px ↗</div>
<div class="ivmbox-text">
Hello! Voting in the '''2025 Arbitration Committee elections ↗''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2025|end}}-1 day}}. All '''eligible users ↗''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee ↗ is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process ↗. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans ↗, topic bans ↗, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy ↗ describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please review the candidates ↗ and submit your choices on the '''2025|poll}}|voting page ↗'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. <small>MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:58, 18 November 2025 (UTC)</small>
</div>
</div>
<!-- Message sent by User:Cyberpower678@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2025/Coordination/MM/08&oldid=1322758940 -->
December 2025
25px|alt=icon ↗ Hello, I'm Bagumba. Your recent edit to the page :Philip Rivers ↗ appears to have included premature information ↗ about a reported sports transaction ↗, so it has been undone for now. The transaction is based on anonymous sources ↗ and/or awaiting an official announcement. Please cite a reliable source ↗ '''confirming its completion''' or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you think there has been a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page ↗. Thank you. <!-- Template:Uw-sportstrans --> —Bagumba (talk) 19:37, 9 December 2025 (UTC)
I have sent you a note about a page you started
Hi RickStrate2029. Thank you for your work on Phil Craig (South African politician) ↗. Another editor, Mariamnei, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol ↗ and left the following comment:
{{Bq|1=Thank you for your work on this article. Please establish notability as per WP:NPOL ↗. Thanks and have a great day!}}
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{code|<nowiki>{{Re|</nowiki>Mariamnei<nowiki>}}</nowiki>}}. <small>(Message delivered via the Page Curation ↗ tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)</small><!-- Template:Sentnote-NPF -->
Mariamnei (talk) 11:53, 13 January 2026 (UTC)
Introduction to contentious topics
{{ivmbox | image = Commons-emblem-notice.svg |imagesize=50px | bg = #E5F8FF | text = You have recently edited a page related to '''the Arab–Israeli conflict ↗''', a topic designated as '''''contentious ↗'''''. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and <em>does <strong>not</strong> imply that there are any issues with your editing</em>.
A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as ''contentious topics''. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee ↗. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia's norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators ↗ have an expanded level of powers and discretion in order to reduce disruption to the project.
Within contentious topics, editors should edit <strong>carefully and constructively</strong>, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:
- adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia ↗;
- comply with all applicable policies and guidelines ↗;
- follow editorial and behavioural best practices;
- comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
- refrain from gaming the system ↗.
<p><strong>Additionally, you must be logged in, have 500 edits, and have an account age of 30 days ↗, and you are not allowed to make more than 1 revert within 24 hours on any page within this topic.</strong></p><p>Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics <em>procedures</em>, you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard ↗ or you may learn more about this contentious topic ↗. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{tl|Ctopics/aware}} template. </p>}}<!-- Derived from Template:Contentious topics/alert/first --> User:Bluethricecreamman <span style="font-size: 85%;">(Talk·Contribs ↗)</span> 20:05, 22 January 2026 (UTC)
Endorsements
Social media is not a permittable source for endorsements '''made by individuals'''. It is intentionally exempt from the organization criteria because there was not enough consensus to ban it. The onus is now on you to prove why it would not be reliable given that all other editors on the page disagree with you :) aesurias <small>''(ping me in your reply, or I won't see it)'' (talk)</small> 20:48, 10 February 2026 (UTC)
2026 United States House of Representatives elections in Kentucky ↗ reversion
RickStrate2029, can you please explain why you made {{diff2|1338234322|this edit}} which seems to be based on the 2025-11-03 version and why there's no edit summary for this edit? Daniel Quinlan (talk) 00:24, 14 February 2026 (UTC)
April 2026
25px|alt=Information icon ↗ Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, articles should not be moved without good reason. They should have a name that is both accurate and intuitive. Wikipedia has some guidelines ↗ in place to help with this. Generally, a page should only be moved to a new title if the current name does not follow these guidelines. Also, if a page move is being discussed, consensus ↗ needs to be reached before anybody moves the page. If you would like to experiment with page titles and moving, please use the test ↗ Wikipedia. Take a look at the welcome page ↗ to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. ''Please seek consensus prior to moving articles and especially refrain from doing so across multiple articles where no discussion has established a basis for a move. ~''<!-- Template:uw-move1 --> Pbritti (talk) 19:28, 17 April 2026 (UTC)
:Welcome to you as well. The article was moved due to consensus in the talk page, and the information provided in the sources used throughout the page (which indicate the new title was more fitting than the old one.) The new title will be restored shortly, in future edits I'd encourage you to keep WP:NPOV in mind. RickStrate2029 (talk) 22:48, 17 April 2026 (UTC)
::A suggestion from one other editor is not consensus. The re-moving after you were reverted and asked to engage in the discussion process is disruptive. See Wikipedia:Requested moves#CM ↗ for information on how to open such a discussion. ~ <span style="color: #e3308a">oklopfer</span> (💬) 23:11, 17 April 2026 (UTC)
:::RickStrate2029, please listen to what Oklopfer said: you did something unideal with your undiscussed moves, but massively escalated the issue by doubling down (which contradicts a number of important policies). As for {{tq|I'd encourage you to keep WP:NPOV in mind}}, I have no idea what makes you think NPOV plays a role here. If you are unfamiliar with a Wikipedia process, please seek guidance at the Teahouse ↗ or one of the many other helpful places on the project. ~ Pbritti (talk) 02:12, 18 April 2026 (UTC)
::::I'd encourage you to avoid any further edit warring, as that specifically is pretty expressly forbidden per Wikipedia policy. Your soft violations of WP:NPOV are one thing, but nobody likes an edit war. RickStrate2029 (talk) 03:49, 18 April 2026 (UTC)
:::::The only one engaging in edit warring is you. You were reverted by two separate editors once each following your disruptive actions. You are the only one performing actions {{tq|expressly forbidden per Wikipedia policy}}. In light of your previous blocks for edit warring and vandalism, it's likely you will be blocked if you persist in disruption related to these articles. ~ Pbritti (talk) 04:43, 18 April 2026 (UTC)
::::::The only one reverting the moves thus far has been you, but I've informed you of the risks of edit warring to the best of my ability. If you choose to continue disregarding the Wikipedia policy, that is your decision I suppose, but I doubt it will be taken positively. Best of luck though. RickStrate2029 (talk) 04:51, 18 April 2026 (UTC)
:::::::Me reverting you: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=2026_United_States%E2%80%93Holy_See_rift&diff=prev&oldid=1349533878 ↗. Oklopfer reverting you: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=2026_United_States%E2%80%93Holy_See_rift&diff=prev&oldid=1349572687 ↗. You do not seem to understand what you are talking about. Please don't cast aspersions ↗, as you can and will face sanctions for those. ~ Pbritti (talk) 04:57, 18 April 2026 (UTC)
::::::::Unfortunately, the only one unable to comprehend what they're speaking about in this instance is you. My recommendation would be to not spread misinformation, there are two different discussions in the talk page right now where a majority of editors approve of the changes I've initiated.
::::::::You're all alone on this one, nobody supports the unilateral changes you keep pushing, but I suppose we'll see where the conversation leads. RickStrate2029 (talk) 17:47, 18 April 2026 (UTC)
:::::::::No, I disagree with the change, too. You should open a formal requested move using the link I provided above to substantiate your claim that the majority of other editors support such a change.
:::::::::Your responses here don't feel like they are fully in good faith, so I would also like to caution you about that. ~ <span style="color: #e3308a">oklopfer</span> (💬) 20:51, 18 April 2026 (UTC)
::::::::::It's clear that you're new to this platform, and have much to learn about the Wikipedia process and it's most important policies. Making significant changes on a unilateral basis is generally frowned up, my recommendation would be to continue your trajectory no further. RickStrate2029 (talk) 00:25, 20 April 2026 (UTC)