W
Active Editors
Back to Profile

User Talk: SpeedyHaste

Server-side rendered snapshot of this editor's Wikipedia talk page discussions.

Hey



hey i just wanted to let you know that ive made a new article , maybe you can check it out if you want. The article is Dibran Wars (1912-1921) ↗. Peja mapping (talk) 18:06, 1 December 2024 (UTC)

:alr, i will check it and fix any mistakes :) SpeedyHaste (talk) 18:16, 1 December 2024 (UTC)
::Ive also nominated the article Battle of Rogovë ↗ for deletion. Can you go and take part in the deletion discussion. Peja mapping (talk) 12:09, 5 December 2024 (UTC)

Yo



hey i also made a new article on the Muzaka-Serbian Conflict ↗. Peja mapping (talk) 17:59, 14 December 2024 (UTC)

December 2024


25px|alt=Information icon ↗ Hello, SpeedyHaste, welcome to Wikipedia ↗ and thank you for your contributions ↗. Your editing pattern indicates that you may be using multiple accounts or coordinating editing with people outside Wikipedia, such as {{User|SpeedyHaste2}}. Our policy on multiple accounts ↗ usually does not allow this, and users who misuse multiple accounts may be blocked from editing ↗. If you operate multiple accounts directly or with the help of another person, please disclose ↗ these connections. Thank you.<!-- Template:uw-agf-sock --> <span class="nowrap">—<span style="color: #0b541f;">'''TechnoSquirrel69'''</span></span> <small>(<span style="color: #0b541f;">'''sigh'''</span>)</small> 19:26, 15 December 2024 (UTC)

:that was my friend trying to make me mad and get me banned for no reason SpeedyHaste (talk) 20:52, 15 December 2024 (UTC)

December 2024


{{Tmbox
| style = background: #f8eaba
| image = 55px ↗
| text = '''''This account has been blocked ↗ indefinitely''''' as a sockpuppet ↗&#32;that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed ↗, but using them for ''illegitimate'' ↗ reasons '''is not''', and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted ↗. If this account is not a sockpuppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block ↗ by first reading the guide to appealing blocks ↗, then adding the text <!-- Copy the text as it appears on the page, not as it appears in this edit area. --><code><nowiki>{{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}</nowiki></code> below. Izno (talk) 22:03, 15 December 2024 (UTC)<!-- Template:SockBlock -->}}

{{unblock reviewed |1=My friend created that account to get me blocked on purpose and i have proof of it. SpeedyHaste (talk) 22:06, 15 December 2024 (UTC) |decline = I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

Please read the guide to appealing blocks ↗ for more information. voorts (talk/contributions ↗) 02:01, 28 December 2024 (UTC)}}

{{{unblock reviewed |1=Hello, and thank you for noticing this. I just wanted to say that I have never caused any damage to this encyclopedia and made some useful contributions. If I have done so, then I apologize. But it is not the reason why I got blocked. I got blocked as a sockpuppet because Wikipedia administrators think I am related to Albanian atdhetar and SpeedyHaste2, when in reality, Albanian atdhetar is just one of my online friends who made an account named after me, and got me falsely blocked for it. I hope to get unblocked because I haven't done anything wrong.<br > — SpeedyHaste |accept = When this was bumped down to regular sock block from a CU-block, the CU noted in the block log: ''"bump down from cu block, but still clearly at least a meat situation''". The appealing user has said this is in fact the case. The fact is we rarely, if ever actually know who operated what account. The demands below for proof are asking to prove a nagative, that this user did ''not'' operate these other accounts, one of which they claim was deliberately created to Joe job ↗ them. I can't see how anyone could conclusively prove this either way and share this users' questioning attitude below, in that I honestly don't know what proof they were expected to proffer that would have satisfied these demands. At the end of the day it a matter of either believing nothing they have said, or assuming good faith that, whatver happened, it will not happen again. Welcome back. Beeblebrox <sup>Beebletalks</sup> 20:20, 3 January 2025 (UTC)}}

: What's your proof? PhilKnight (talk) 23:03, 15 December 2024 (UTC)

: Literally ask SpeedyHaste2 yourself. SpeedyHaste (talk) 07:28, 16 December 2024 (UTC)
::That's not proof- what is your proof? If they've said so, please provide diffs. 331dot (talk) 09:28, 16 December 2024 (UTC)
:::how am i supposed to prove without screenshots? SpeedyHaste (talk) 13:29, 16 December 2024 (UTC)
:::: diff of SpeedyHaste2 saying they are separate people ↗. PhilKnight (talk) 20:24, 16 December 2024 (UTC)
:::::@Izno here's your proof mate can I get unblocked now? SpeedyHaste (talk) 07:58, 21 December 2024 (UTC)
::::::That is still not proof. How do we know that's not you posting that on that account? voorts (talk/contributions ↗) 21:51, 29 December 2024 (UTC)
:::::::Good point, but how should I prove it otherwise? SpeedyHaste (talk) 08:33, 30 December 2024 (UTC)
::::::::@voorts can you atleast check my unblock request? SpeedyHaste (talk) 08:51, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
:::::::::Since I've declined your previous unblock request, the general practice is to let another admin deal with it. That said, I am not persuaded by your evidence and would decline your unblock request. voorts (talk/contributions ↗) 16:08, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
::::::::::Can you please tell me how else i should prove it? SpeedyHaste (talk) 17:33, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
:::::::::::@Beeblebrox Thank you for unblocking me, but the story doesn't end there. My 2 other friends, Goofyy ahhh and Shellshockersi got blocked for this same reason. All 3 of us and Albanian atdhetar are in a friend group, and they also got suspected and blocked for this same thing and they also didn't do anything wrong.
:::::::::::— SpeedyHaste SpeedyHaste (talk) 21:11, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
::::::::::::We don't do third-party unblock requests. They will have to make convincing appeals on their own if they wish to be unblocked. I'd like to be clear that you should ''not'' consider this as having cleared you of all wrongdoing. This is a second chance, nothing more. Beeblebrox <sup>Beebletalks</sup> 01:42, 4 January 2025 (UTC)
:::::::::::::Ok, I understand. Besides, this was not even my wrongdoing, I haven't vandalized anything on this website nor have done anything bad. I got blocked for something I didnt even do. SpeedyHaste (talk) 07:40, 4 January 2025 (UTC)

August 2025



Hi SpeedyHaste, re: Chetnik attack on the Užice Republic ↗, I notice that you have been adding a lot of content very quickly to the article. Can I ask, where is this content coming from ie are you using a sandbox or LLM ↗ to assist? I find it impossible to add that much content so quickly, with sourcing and checking etc. CNC (talk) 17:16, 28 August 2025 (UTC)

:Hello,
:I had been writing this article and saved its progress on the notes app on my phone over the span of a few days and im adding all of it piece by piece. SpeedyHaste (talk) 17:24, 28 August 2025 (UTC)
::@CommunityNotesContributor can u please respond SpeedyHaste (talk) 08:12, 29 August 2025 (UTC)
:::Thanks for reply. I was considering reviewing the page but ~5K words of Serbian military history isn't something I'm adapt at. I've just very rarely seen a fully developed article created from scratch like that so had to ask. As a suggestion, it'd be better to use your WP:SANDBOX ↗ because there are now lots of disambiguous links, as well as broken citations, which could have been avoided had it been used. Ultimately I'm leaving this article for someone with more experience to look at. CNC (talk) 08:27, 29 August 2025 (UTC)

Kosovo uprising (1945–1951) ↗ moved to draftspace



Thanks for your contributions to Kosovo uprising (1945–1951) ↗. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because '''it has too many problems of language or grammar''' and '''broken references indicating undisclosed copy&paste from other articles'''.
I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page ↗.
When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Joy (talk) 20:38, 30 August 2025 (UTC)

Assassination of Ante Pavelić ↗ moved to draftspace



Thanks for your contributions to Assassination of Ante Pavelić ↗. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because '''it has too many problems of language or grammar''' and '''broken references indicating undocumented copy&paste'''.
I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page ↗.
When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Joy (talk) 18:28, 8 September 2025 (UTC)

September 2025



25px|alt=Information icon ↗ Thank you for your contributions ↗ to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved content from one or more pages into another page. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content (here or elsewhere), Wikipedia's licensing ↗ does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary ↗ at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking ↗ to the copied page, e.g., <code>copied content from <nowiki>page name ↗</nowiki>; see that page's history for attribution</code>. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{tl|copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia ↗. Thank you. <!-- Template:uw-copying --> Joy (talk) 18:29, 8 September 2025 (UTC)

Deletion discussion about Operation Hajka ↗



Hello SpeedyHaste, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

While your contributions are appreciated, I wanted to let you know that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Operation Hajka ↗, should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Operation Hajka ↗.

Deletion discussions ↗ usually run for seven days and are ''not'' votes. Our guide ↗ about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. The most common issue in these discussions is notability ↗, but it's not the only aspect that may be discussed; read the nomination and any other comments carefully before you contribute to the discussion. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with <code><nowiki>{{Re|</nowiki>Wasianpower<nowiki>}}</nowiki></code>. And don't forget to sign your reply with <code><nowiki>~~~~</nowiki></code> . Thanks!

<small>(Message delivered via the Page Curation ↗ tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)</small><!-- Template:AfD-notice-NPF -->

🌸&#8288;wasianpower&#8288;🌸 ↗ (talk&nbsp;•&nbsp;contribs ↗) 03:13, 16 September 2025 (UTC)

:Hi, SpeedyHaste. I notice you translated this article from :sh:Operacija Hajka ↗. Translating articles from other language Wikipedias is normally a great way to get started, but there's a few things you have to keep in mind.
:Firstly, you always have to credit the original authors, in your edit summary, whenever you copy or translate material from another Wikipedia. You can do this quite easily by providing a link to the original page, or by using the content translation tool ↗.
:Secondly, not all Wikipedia pages in other languages are written to the same standards that enWiki expects. They may use sources we can't use, they may have different notability requirements, or they could just be flawed. In this case, the article has extensive copyright issues. As such, I've listed it for presumptive deletion. Sorry about that, I get that's probably frustrating. <span style="color:#EB0533;">GreenLipstickLesbian</span>💌 ↗🦋 ↗ 03:40, 16 September 2025 (UTC)

Attack on Lazarevac (1943) ↗ moved to draftspace



Thanks for your contributions to Attack on Lazarevac (1943) ↗. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because '''it needs more sources to establish notability'''.
I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page ↗.
When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Fade258 (talk) 12:26, 18 September 2025 (UTC)

Draft:Anti-Partisan action in Srem (1944) ↗ moved to draftspace



Thanks for your contributions to Draft:Anti-Partisan action in Srem (1944) ↗. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has too many problems of language or grammar and broken references indicating undocumented copy&paste. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Tronton 23 (talk) 17:10, 5 November 2025 (UTC)

Jovan Nenad's uprising ↗ moved to draftspace



Thanks for your contributions to Jovan Nenad's uprising ↗. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because '''it appears to be a redundant WP:content fork ↗ of Jovan Nenad ↗ with worse sources'''.
I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page ↗.
When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Joy (talk) 20:32, 17 November 2025 (UTC)

:The article isn't WP:content fork ↗ of Jovan Nenad and none of the sources are that unreliable. I also included some books in the source section. SpeedyHaste (talk) 20:41, 17 November 2025 (UTC)
::It definitely looks like it was written without paying attention to what's already there, because its first mention of Jovan Nenad ↗ isn't even linked. Why do we need two separate articles for this? --Joy (talk) 00:13, 18 November 2025 (UTC)

ArbCom 2025 Elections voter message



<div class="ivmbox " style="margin-bottom: 1em; border: 1px solid #a2a9b1; background-color: #fdf2d5; padding: 0.5em; display: flex; align-items: center; ">
<div class="ivmbox-image" style="padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em;flex-basis: 40px">40px ↗</div>
<div class="ivmbox-text">
Hello! Voting in the '''2025 Arbitration Committee elections ↗''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2025|end}}-1 day}}. All '''eligible users ↗''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee ↗ is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process ↗. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans ↗, topic bans ↗, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy ↗ describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please review the candidates ↗ and submit your choices on the '''2025|poll}}|voting page ↗'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. <small>MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:52, 18 November 2025 (UTC)</small>

</div>
</div>
<!-- Message sent by User:Cyberpower678@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2025/Coordination/MM/09&oldid=1322758983 -->

Nomination of :Battle of Prekaz (1999) ↗ for deletion


<div class="afd-notice">
<div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0;">48px|alt=|link= ↗</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article :Battle of Prekaz (1999) ↗ is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines ↗ or whether it should be deleted ↗.

The article will be discussed at '''Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Battle of Prekaz (1999) ↗''' until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.<!-- Template:Afd notice --></div> Wikicommonsfan134 (talk) 04:35, 12 December 2025 (UTC)


Nomination of Yugoslav September offensive ↗ for deletion


<div class="afd-notice"><div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0;">link=|alt=|48x48px ↗</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Yugoslav September offensive ↗ is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines ↗ or whether it should be deleted ↗.
The article will be discussed at '''Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yugoslav September offensive ↗''' until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.<!-- Template:Afd notice --></div>AverageSkiptar (talk) 20:58, 12 December 2025 (UTC)

SDK actions against the Chetniks in the Kragujevac region ↗ moved to draftspace



Thanks for your contributions to SDK actions against the Chetniks in the Kragujevac region ↗. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing as a live article at this time because '''it has too many problems of language or grammar'''.
I have converted it to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page ↗.
When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Donner60 (talk) 16:37, 23 December 2025 (UTC)

Copyright problem: Assassination of Ante Pavelić


30px|link=|alt=Control copyright icon ↗ Hello SpeedyHaste! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Assassination of Ante Pavelić ↗, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted material from other websites or printed works. This article appears to contain work copied from , and therefore to constitute a violation of Wikipedia's copyright policies ↗. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted. While we appreciate your contributions, copying content from other websites is unlawful and against Wikipedia's copyright policy ↗. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators are likely to lose their editing privileges ↗.

If you believe that the article is {{em|not}} a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under license allowed by Wikipedia, then you should do one of the following:

It may also be necessary for the text to be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and to follow Wikipedia article layout ↗. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines ↗.

See Wikipedia:Declaration of consent for all enquiries ↗ for a template of the permissions letter the copyright holder is expected to send.

Otherwise, you may rewrite this article from scratch. If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at [{{fullurl:Talk:Assassination of Ante Pavelić/Temp|action=edit&preload=Template:Copyvio/preload}} this temporary page]. Leave a note at Talk:Assassination of Ante Pavelić ↗ saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved.

Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing!<!-- Template:Nothanks-web --> ''Note: The user who made the listing at Wikipedia:Copyright problems/2026 January 2 ↗ did not notify you, I am notifying you because of that.'' Tenshi! (Talk page) 22:08, 10 January 2026 (UTC)

Nomination of :Kosovo uprising (1945–1951) ↗ for deletion


<div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">48px|alt=|link= ↗</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article :Kosovo uprising (1945–1951) ↗, to which you have significantly contributed ↗, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines ↗ or if it should be deleted ↗.

The discussion will take place at '''Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kosovo uprising (1945–1951) ↗''' until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by ''SDZeroBot'' (talk) 01:02, 22 January 2026 (UTC)<!-- User:SDZeroBot/AfD notifier/template -->

I have sent you a note about a page you started



Hi SpeedyHaste. Thank you for your work on Yugoslav counter-offensive in Kosovo (1998) ↗. Another editor, Scope creep, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol ↗ and left the following comment:

{{Bq|1=Hi, History.com in ref 6 is non-rs. Can you please update it.}}

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{code|<nowiki>{{Re|</nowiki>Scope creep<nowiki>}}</nowiki>}}. <small>(Message delivered via the Page Curation ↗ tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)</small><!-- Template:Sentnote-NPF -->

'''<span style="text-shadow:7px 7px 8px black; font-family:Papyrus"><span style="color:#3399ff">scope_creep</span><sup>Talk</sup></span>''' 17:31, 2 February 2026 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started



Hi SpeedyHaste. Thank you for your work on Yugoslav counter-offensive in Kosovo (1998) ↗. Another editor, Scope creep, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol ↗ and left the following comment:

{{Bq|1=Hi, Ref 21, 23, 25, 28 don't have citations. Ref 52 is damaged "Cite error: The named reference "politika" was defined multiple times with different content"}}

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{code|<nowiki>{{Re|</nowiki>Scope creep<nowiki>}}</nowiki>}}. <small>(Message delivered via the Page Curation ↗ tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)</small><!-- Template:Sentnote-NPF -->

'''<span style="text-shadow:7px 7px 8px black; font-family:Papyrus"><span style="color:#3399ff">scope_creep</span><sup>Talk</sup></span>''' 17:33, 2 February 2026 (UTC)

Ways to improve Battle of Petrinja (1995)



Hello, SpeedyHaste,

Thank you for creating Battle of Petrinja (1995) ↗.

I have tagged the page ↗ as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process ↗ and note that:

{{Quote|1=Better you should merge to Petrinja fighting ↗ page. Develop the Petrinja fighting ↗ page with reliable sourcing.}}

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with <code><nowiki>{{Re|</nowiki>SaTnamZIN<nowiki>}}</nowiki></code>. Remember to sign your reply with <code><nowiki>~~~~</nowiki></code>. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse ↗.

<small>Delivered via the Page Curation ↗ tool, on behalf of the reviewer.</small> <!-- Template:Taggednote-NPF -->

SatnaamIN (talk) 08:11, 9 February 2026 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Attack on Lazarevac (1943) ↗


25px|alt=Information icon ↗ Hello, SpeedyHaste. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Attack on Lazarevac (1943) ↗, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted ↗, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it ↗ again&#32;or request ↗ that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted ↗ so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 13:09, 18 February 2026 (UTC)

Proposed deletion ↗ of :Action in Grocka (1942) ↗


left|link=|alt=Notice|48px| ↗

The article :Action in Grocka (1942) ↗ has been proposed for deletion ↗&#32;because of the following concern:
<blockquote>'''One source, passing mention, no detail. Notability of a subject on Wikipedia requires significant coverage in reliable sources (plural). This is a paramilitary enforcement operation of a kind that no doubt occurred thousands of times during the war.'''</blockquote>

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary ↗ or on the article's talk page ↗.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process ↗, but other deletion process ↗es exist. In particular, articles for deletion ↗ allows discussion to reach consensus ↗ for deletion based on established criteria ↗.

If the proposed deletion has already been carried out, you may request undeletion ↗ of the article at any time.<!-- Template:Proposed deletion notify --> Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me ↗) 06:39, 5 April 2026 (UTC)

Proposed deletion ↗ of :Battle of Col (1944) ↗


left|link=|alt=Notice|48px| ↗

The article :Battle of Col (1944) ↗ has been proposed for deletion ↗&#32;because of the following concern:
<blockquote>'''Passing mentions of this event in sources, little detail. One skirmish of many over years of occupation, lacks notability due to lack of significant coverage on reliable sources independent of the subject, per the notability guideline.'''</blockquote>

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary ↗ or on the article's talk page ↗.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process ↗, but other deletion process ↗es exist. In particular, articles for deletion ↗ allows discussion to reach consensus ↗ for deletion based on established criteria ↗.

If the proposed deletion has already been carried out, you may request undeletion ↗ of the article at any time.<!-- Template:Proposed deletion notify --> Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me ↗) 07:08, 5 April 2026 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Jovan Nenad's uprising ↗


25px|alt=Information icon ↗ Hello, SpeedyHaste. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Jovan Nenad's uprising ↗, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted ↗, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it ↗ again&#32;or request ↗ that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted ↗ so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 02:07, 20 April 2026 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Northern Dalmatian Front (1991) ↗


25px|alt=Information icon ↗ Hello, SpeedyHaste. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Northern Dalmatian Front (1991) ↗, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted ↗, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it ↗ again&#32;or request ↗ that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted ↗ so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 13:07, 24 April 2026 (UTC)

Nomination of :Action in Grocka (1942) ↗ for merging to Serbian Gestapo ↗


<div class="afd-notice">
<div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0;">48px|alt=|link= ↗</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article :Action in Grocka (1942) ↗ is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines ↗ or whether it should be merged ↗ into Serbian Gestapo ↗.

The article is being discussed at '''Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Action in Grocka (1942) ↗''' until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the AfD notice from the article until the discussion is closed.<!-- Template:Afd notice --></div> Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me ↗) 07:28, 28 April 2026 (UTC)

Nomination of :Action in Grocka (1942) ↗ for deletion


<div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">48px|alt=|link= ↗</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article :Action in Grocka (1942) ↗, to which you have significantly contributed ↗, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines ↗ or if it should be deleted ↗.

The discussion will take place at '''Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Action in Grocka (1942) ↗''' until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by ''SDZeroBot'' (talk) 01:03, 29 April 2026 (UTC)<!-- User:SDZeroBot/AfD notifier/template -->

Serbian operations in the Slovene Littoral (1944–1945) ↗ moved to draftspace



Thanks for your contributions to Serbian operations in the Slovene Littoral (1944–1945) ↗. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing as a live article at this time because '''it needs more sources to establish notability'''.
I have converted it to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page ↗.
When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. --Joy (talk) 21:28, 5 May 2026 (UTC)

Eastern Front infobox



Hey there! Thanks for contributing to the Eastern Front ↗ infobox. While I agree that the Government of National Salvation's forces were involved on the Eastern Front, they were never affored recognition as a state by other Axis powers, and therefore do not belong in the infobox. They are absent from the infobox for European theatre of World War II ↗ for this reason. Just wanted to let you know about the revert, thanks! Xenomorph 001 (talk) 13:36, 8 May 2026 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Jovan Nenad's uprising ↗


48px|left|alt=|link= ↗
Hello, SpeedyHaste. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation ↗ submission or draft ↗ page you started, "Jovan Nenad's uprising ↗".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion ↗. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. <!-- Template:Db-draft-deleted --><!-- Template:Db-csd-deleted-custom --> <span style="font-family:Papyrus; color:#800080;">'''''L'''''iz</span> <sup style="font-family: Times New Roman; color: #006400;">'''''Read!''''' ↗ '''''Talk!'''''</sup> 01:49, 18 May 2026 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Northern Dalmatian Front (1991) ↗


48px|left|alt=|link= ↗

Hello, SpeedyHaste. This message concerns the Articles for Creation ↗ submission or draft ↗ page you started, "Northern Dalmatian Front ↗".

Drafts that go unedited for six months are eligible for deletion, in accordance with our draftspace policy ↗, and this one has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply {{edit|Draft:Northern Dalmatian Front (1991)|edit the submission}}, and remove the {{tlc|db-afc}}, {{tlc|db-draft}}, or {{tlc|db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you read this, you can '''request its undeletion''' ↗. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the draft so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! <!-- Template:Db-draft-notice --> DreamRimmer bot II (talk) 13:25, 22 May 2026 (UTC)

Attack on Šid (1991) ↗ moved to draftspace



Thanks for your contributions to Attack on Šid (1991) ↗. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing as a live article at this time because '''it needs more sources to establish notability''' and '''most existing sources seem to be WP:BLOG ↗'''.
I have converted it to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page ↗.
When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. --Joy (talk) 16:28, 23 May 2026 (UTC)

Uprising in the Independent State of Croatia (1941) ↗ moved to draftspace



Thanks for your contributions to Uprising in the Independent State of Croatia (1941) ↗. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing as a live article at this time because '''topic area already described in several existing articles, apparently no secondary sources specifically about this listed, risk of improper synthesis ↗'''.
I have converted it to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page ↗.
When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. --Joy (talk) 15:02, 31 May 2026 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:SDK actions against the Chetniks in the Kragujevac region ↗


48px|left|alt=|link= ↗

Hello, SpeedyHaste. This message concerns the Articles for Creation ↗ submission or draft ↗ page you started, "SDK actions against the Chetniks in the Kragujevac region ↗".

Drafts that go unedited for six months are eligible for deletion, in accordance with our draftspace policy ↗, and this one has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply {{edit|Draft:SDK actions against the Chetniks in the Kragujevac region|edit the submission}}, and remove the {{tlc|db-afc}}, {{tlc|db-draft}}, or {{tlc|db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you read this, you can '''request its undeletion''' ↗. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the draft so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! <!-- Template:Db-draft-notice --> DreamRimmer bot II (talk) 17:25, 23 June 2026 (UTC)

Nomination of Rommel Offensive ↗ for Deletion



link=|alt=Notice|left|48x48px ↗
The article Rommel Offensive ↗ has been proposed for deletion ↗&#x20;because of the following concern:<blockquote>Complete lack of any valid sources either for the participation of the units put forward or the chain of command&nbsp;</blockquote>You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary ↗ or on the article's talk page ↗.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process ↗, but other deletion processes ↗ exist. In particular, articles for deletion ↗ allows discussion to reach consensus ↗ for deletion based on established criteria ↗.

If the proposed deletion has already been carried out, you may request undeletion ↗ of the article at any time. Kel0bthe6er (talk) 14:42, 2 July 2026 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Attacks on Lučane ↗


25px|alt=Information icon ↗ Hello, SpeedyHaste. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Attacks on Lučane ↗, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted ↗, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it ↗ again&#32;or request ↗ that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted ↗ so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 06:06, 6 July 2026 (UTC)