Back to Profile

User Talk: Sportsfan77777

Server-side rendered snapshot of this editor's Wikipedia talk page discussions.

{{Archives|style=width:10em;|

2016 ↗

2017 ↗

2018 ↗

2019 ↗

2020 ↗

2021 ↗

2022 ↗

}}

Welcome

<div style="text-align: center; padding: 1em; border: solid 2px darkblue; background-color: darkblue; -moz-border-radius: 25px 25px 0 0; -webkit-border-radius: 25px 25px 0 0; border-radius: 25px 25px 0 0;">
<span style="font-size:120%; color:white">Hello Sportsfan77777, and <span style="color:orange">Welcome to Wikipedia!</span> ↗</span></div>
<div style="align: left; padding: 1em; border: solid 2px darkblue; background-color: white; -moz-border-radius: 0 0 25px 25px; -webkit-border-radius: 0 0 25px 25px; border-radius: 0 0 25px 25px;">
'''''Welcome to Wikipedia! ↗''''' I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to stay ↗. As a first step, you may wish to read the Introduction ↗.

If you have any questions, feel free to ask me at my talk page – I'm happy to help. Or, you can ask your question at the New contributors' help page ↗.

-------
Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia... ↗

<big> '''Finding your way around:''' </big>
{{col-begin}}
{{col-2}}

'''Table of contents ↗'''

'''Department directory ↗'''

{{col-end}}

<big> '''Need help?''' </big>
{{col-begin}}
{{col-2}}

'''Questions ↗''' – a guide on where to ask questions

'''Cheatsheet ↗''' – quick reference on Wikipedia's mark-up codes

'''Wikipedia's 5 pillars ↗''' – an overview of Wikipedia's foundations

'''Article wizard ↗''' – a Wizard to help you create articles

'''The simplified ruleset ↗''' – a summary of Wikipedia's most important rules

'''Guide to Wikipedia ↗''' – a thorough step-by-step guide to Wikipedia

{{col-end}}

<big> '''How you can help:''' </big>
{{col-begin}}
{{col-2}}

'''Contributing to Wikipedia ↗''' – a guide on how you can help

'''Community portal ↗''' – Wikipedia's hub of activity

{{col-end}}

<big> '''Additional tips...''' </big>
{{col-begin}}
{{col-2}}

Please sign your messages on talk pages with four tildes (<nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>). This will automatically insert your "signature" (your username and a date stamp). The File:Button sig.png ↗ or File:Insert-signature.png ↗ button, on the tool bar above Wikipedia's text editing window, also does this.

If you would like to play around with your new Wiki skills the '''''Sandbox ↗''''' is for you.

{{col-end}}

''Sportsfan77777, '''good luck, and have fun.''''' – Aboutmovies (talk) 03:14, 12 January 2014 (UTC)</div>

Happy New Year, Sportsfan77777!

<div style="border: 3px solid #FFD700; background-color: #FFFAF0; padding:0.2em 0.4em; height:auto; min-height:173px; border-radius:1em; box-shadow: 0.1em 0.1em 0.5em rgba(0,0,0,0.75);" class="plainlinks">
left|x173px ↗x173px|right ↗
{{Paragraph break}}
{{Center|{{resize|179%|'''''Happy New Year ↗!'''''}}}}
'''Sportsfan77777''',<br />Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year ↗, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia.
<br />Abishe (talk) 01:58, 1 January 2023 (UTC)<br /><br />
</div>
   ''{{resize|88%|Send New Year cheer by adding {{tls|Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.}}''
{{clear}} Abishe (talk) 01:58, 1 January 2023 (UTC)

Vera Menchik ↗

I see that you have nominated this for GA. I was looking it over with the idea of doing a review, but, it looks like I would have to get a copy of Tanner's biography. Before I do that, is there anyone else who is doing a review? Note, I have never done a GA review; the idea only occurred to me because I have been working on Paul Morphy ↗, after getting a copy of Lawson's biography. Bruce leverett (talk) 02:34, 13 April 2023 (UTC)

:Sorry, silly question, I misunderstood the process. There can only be one reviewer. I will get the book, and when it arrives, I'll sign up to review the article. Bruce leverett (talk) 20:12, 14 April 2023 (UTC)

:: Hi {{u|Bruce leverett}}! Generally, it isn't expected of a GA reviewer (or even an FA reviewer) to obtain a copy of the sources if they aren't easily accessible. If you are reviewing an article and have a question about the accuracy of a particular statement, you could ask the nominator for a clarification. Sportsfan77777 (talk) 05:44, 22 April 2023 (UTC)
:::First, I have my copy of the book and am reading it, but I have been busy (and at one point sick), and I don't want to start the clock on a 7-day process until I know that I can follow through promptly.
:::I am aware that one can do a GA or FA review without having all the sources at one's fingertips, and if a reviewer had to spend $48 for each such review he did, it could get expensive. But I am interested in the topic, and this seemed like as good an occasion as any to acquire a new chess book. Also, it seems to me that when an article depends heavily on one source, which this one does (as it should, since Tanner's book is now "the" reference on this topic), doing a review without that source is going to be unsatisfying for the reviewer. Bruce leverett (talk) 13:10, 22 April 2023 (UTC)
::::Okay, great! I just wanted to make sure you didn't feel forced to spend money. Also, just to let you know, the 7-day rule isn't strict. Many reviews can take longer, unless there really aren't a lot of comments. Sportsfan77777 (talk) 04:57, 30 April 2023 (UTC)

Your GA ↗ nomination of Vera Menchik ↗

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've Talk:Vera Menchik/GA1{{!}}begun reviewing ↗ the article Vera Menchik ↗ you nominated for GA ↗-status according to the criteria ↗. 20px|link= ↗ This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period.   <small>Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Bruce leverett</small> -- Bruce leverett (talk) 03:41, 7 May 2023 (UTC)

WikiProject Women in Green June 2023 Good Article Editathon notification

<div style="border: 6px solid #2bbf08; background: #FFF; background-color:#FFFFFF; padding: 1ex 1ex 1ex 1.5ex; margin: 0px 0px 1em 1em; font-size: 99%">
100px|right ↗
Hello {{<includeonly>safesubst:</includeonly>BASEPAGENAME}}:

'''WikiProject Women in Green ↗''' is holding a ''' month-long Good Article Editathon event in June 2023 ↗'''!<br /><br />
Running from June 1 to 30, 2023, WikiProject Women in Green (WiG) is hosting a Good Article (GA) editathon event – another Wildcard Edition! Participants are invited to work on nominating and/or reviewing GA submissions related to '''any and all''' women and women's works during the event period. Want to improve an article about a Bollywood actress? Go for it. A pioneering female climate scientist? Absolutely. An award-winning book or film by a woman? Yes! GA resources and one-on-one support will be provided by experienced GA editors, and participants will have the opportunity to receive a special WiG barnstar for their efforts.

We hope to see you there!

Alanna the Brave (talk)

{{small|You are receiving this message as a member of the WikiProject Women in Green ↗. You can remove yourself from receiving notifications here ↗.}}

</div><noinclude></s>

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:27, 25 May 2023 (UTC)

Your GA ↗ nomination of Vera Menchik ↗

The article Vera Menchik ↗ you nominated as a good article ↗ has passed 20px|link= ↗; see Talk:Vera Menchik ↗ for comments about the article, and Talk:Vera Menchik/GA1 ↗ for the nomination. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a '''bold link''' under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it ↗ within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility.  <small>Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Bruce leverett</small> -- Bruce leverett (talk) 22:41, 27 June 2023 (UTC)

Vera Menchik ↗

Thank you for taking on this article and driving it to GA. Among chess players, Menchik is Notable with a capital N. Looking at Wikipedia biographies of chess players, I would have to conclude that it's not easy to write a good one, but you have set a good example. Bruce leverett (talk) 03:18, 1 July 2023 (UTC)

August 2023 Good Article Nominations backlog drive

{| style="border: 5px solid #ABCDEF ; background-color: #FFF; padding:10px 15px 0"
|style="padding: 0; vertical-align: middle; height: 1.1em; font-size:130%" |'''Good article nominations ↗ |''' <span style="font-size:85%">August 2023 Backlog Drive</span>
|rowspan=3|right|75px ↗
|-
|'''August 2023 Backlog Drive:'''

On 1 August, a one-month backlog drive for good article nominations will begin.

Barnstars will be awarded.

Interested in taking part? You can '''sign up here ↗'''.

|-
|colspan=2|'''Other ways to participate:'''

Join the conversations on our talkpage ↗

|-
|colspan=2 style="font-size:85%; padding-top:15px;"|You're receiving this message because you have reviewed or nominated a good article in the last year.
(t · c ↗) '''<span style="color: black">buidhe</span>''' 05:15, 30 July 2023 (UTC)
|}

Proposed deletion ↗ of :Kassa Korley ↗

left|link=|alt=Notice|48px| ↗

The article :Kassa Korley ↗ has been proposed for deletion ↗ because of the following concern:
<blockquote>'''Not even a grand master. Fails WP:GNG ↗. Not known for anything else.'''</blockquote>

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons ↗.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary ↗ or on the article's talk page ↗.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process ↗, but other deletion process ↗es exist. In particular, the speedy deletion ↗ process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion ↗ allows discussion to reach consensus ↗ for deletion. '''Usedtobecool''' ☎️ 10:41, 7 September 2023 (UTC)

Women in Green GA Editathon October 2023 - Around the World in 31 Days

<div style="border: 6px solid #2bbf08; background: #FFF; background-color:#FFFFFF; padding: 1ex 1ex 1ex 1.5ex; margin: 0px 0px 1em 1em; font-size: 99%">
100px|right ↗
Hello {{<includeonly>safesubst:</includeonly>BASEPAGENAME}}:

'''WikiProject Women in Green ↗''' is holding a ''' month-long Good Article Edit-a-thon event in October 2023 ↗'''!<br /><br />
Running from October 1 to 31, 2023, WikiProject Women in Green (WiG) is hosting a Good Article (GA) edit-a-thon event with the theme '''Around the World in 31 Days'''! All experience levels welcome. Never worked on a GA project before? We'll teach you how to get started. Or maybe you're an old hand at GAs – we'd love to have you involved! Participants are invited to work on nominating and/or reviewing GA submissions related to women and women's works (e.g., books, films) during the event period. We hope to collectively cover article subjects from at least '''31 countries''' (or broader international articles) by month's end. GA resources and one-on-one support will be provided by experienced GA editors, and participants will have the opportunity to earn a special WiG barnstar for their efforts.

We hope to see you there!

Alanna the Brave (talk) 00:53, 22 September 2023 (UTC)

{{small|You are receiving this message as a member of the WikiProject Women in Green ↗. You can remove yourself from receiving notifications here ↗.}}

</div><noinclude></s>

CfD nomination at {{Section link|Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2023 October 1#Category:WikiProject X members}}

<div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">48px|alt=|link= ↗</div>A category or categories you have created have been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization ↗ guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at '''{{Section link|Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2023 October 1#Category:WikiProject X members}}''' on the categories for discussion ↗ page. Thank you. <span style="background:#1d9ffc; color:white; padding:5px; box-shadow:darkgray 2px 2px 2px;">Qwerfjkl</span><span style="background:#79c0f2;color:white; padding:2px; box-shadow:darkgray 2px 2px 2px;">talk</span> 09:36, 2 October 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

<div class="ivmbox " style="margin-bottom: 1em; border: 1px solid #AAA; background-color: ivory; padding: 0.5em; display: flex; align-items: center; ">
<div class="ivmbox-image" style="padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em; flex: 1 0 40px; max-width: 100px">40px ↗</div>
<div class="ivmbox-text">
Hello! Voting in the '''2023 Arbitration Committee elections ↗''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2023|end}}-1 day}}. All '''eligible users ↗''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee ↗ is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process ↗. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans ↗, topic bans ↗, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy ↗ describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates ↗ and submit your choices on the '''2023|poll}}|voting page ↗'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. <small>MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:42, 28 November 2023 (UTC)</small>

</div>
</div>

March 2024 GAN backlog drive

{| style="border: 5px solid #ABCDEF ; background-color: #FFF; padding:10px 15px 0"
|style="padding: 0; vertical-align: middle; height: 1.1em; font-size:130%" |'''Good article nominations ↗ |''' <span style="font-size:85%">March 2024 Backlog Drive</span>
|rowspan=3|right|75px ↗
|-
|'''March 2024 Backlog Drive:'''

On 1 March, a one-month backlog drive for good article nominations will begin.

Barnstars will be awarded.

Interested in taking part? You can '''sign up here ↗''' or '''ask questions here ↗'''.

|-
|colspan=2 style="font-size:85%; padding-top:15px;"|You're receiving this message because you have reviewed or nominated a good article in the last year.
|} (t · c ↗) '''<span style="color: black">buidhe</span>''' 02:39, 23 February 2024 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 4

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Women's Candidates Tournament ↗, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Georgia ↗.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 18:08, 4 April 2024 (UTC)

Concerning your recent loserfruit edit.

Good day,

I was wondering why you deleted the section about channel growth that i did in your latest edit on that page. Cause it is relevant objective information that is up to date, gives more details about the channel over the years and is referenced well.

The readdition and rephrasing about the 2nd most female channel in the past is perfect.
As a non native english speaker however "have had" sounds a bit weird. Could it be possible to just change it to "had" or would that not be grammatically correct. The link reference you added there needs an update as well i think. When clicking on it it gives me "the page you are looking for isnt here"

with kind regards, Infrabel1 (talk) 18:36, 5 April 2024 (UTC)

: Hi, you can't add your own interpretation of a source, especially one that's not an RS. Sportsfan77777 (talk) 20:04, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
::Link rot on the page has been restored.
::I would however like to point out that the reference after checking out the article is not a reliable source.
::The reference (yahoo finance) itself uses a quote from another website (lineups.com) wich is not considered a reliable source.
::Is there no other source you can use as a reference? Infrabel1 (talk) 14:20, 17 April 2024 (UTC)

Women in Green GA Editathon June 2024 - Going Back in Time

<div style="border: 6px solid #2bbf08; background: #FFF; background-color:#FFFFFF; padding: 1ex 1ex 1ex 1.5ex; margin: 0px 0px 1em 1em; font-size: 99%">
100px|right ↗
Hello {{<includeonly>safesubst:</includeonly>BASEPAGENAME}}:

'''WikiProject Women in Green ↗''' is holding a ''' month-long Good Article Edit-a-thon event in June 2024 ↗'''!<br /><br />
Running from June 1 to 30, 2024, WikiProject Women in Green (WiG) is hosting a Good Article (GA) edit-a-thon event with the theme '''Going Back in Time'''! All experience levels welcome. Never worked on a GA project before? We'll teach you how to get started. Or maybe you're an old hand at GAs – we'd love to have you involved! Participants are invited to work on nominating and/or reviewing GA submissions related to women and women's works (e.g., books, films) during the event period. We hope to collectively cover article subjects from at least '''20 centuries''' by month's end. GA resources and one-on-one support will be provided by experienced GA editors, and participants will have the opportunity to earn a special WiG barnstar for their efforts.

We hope to see you there!
{{small|You are receiving this message as a member of the WikiProject Women in Green ↗. You can remove yourself from receiving notifications here ↗.}}</div> MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:12, 16 May 2024 (UTC)

Women in Green's "Around the World in 31 Days" GA Editathon – October 2024

<div style="border: 6px solid #2bbf08; background: #FFF; background-color:#FFFFFF; padding: 1ex 1ex 1ex 1.5ex; margin: 0px 0px 1em 1em; font-size: 99%">
100px|right ↗
Hello Sportsfan77777:

'''WikiProject Women in Green ↗''' is holding a ''' month-long Good Article Edit-a-thon event in October 2024 ↗'''!<br /><br />
Running from October 1 to 31, 2024, WikiProject Women in Green (WiG) is hosting a Good Article (GA) edit-a-thon event with the theme '''Around the World in 31 Days'''! All experience levels welcome. Never worked on a GA project before? We'll teach you how to get started. Or maybe you're an old hand at GAs – we'd love to have you involved! Participants are invited to work on nominating and/or reviewing GA submissions related to women and women's works (e.g., books, films) during the event period. We hope to collectively cover article subjects from at least '''31 countries''' (or broader international articles) by month's end. GA resources and one-on-one support will be provided by experienced GA editors, and participants will have the opportunity to earn a special WiG barnstar for their efforts.

We hope to see you there!

Grnrchst (talk) & Alanna the Brave (talk)

{{small|You are receiving this message as a member of the WikiProject Women in Green ↗. You can remove yourself from receiving notifications here ↗.}}
</div>
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:22, 11 September 2024 (UTC)

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

<div class="ivmbox " style="margin-bottom: 1em; border: 1px solid #a2a9b1; background-color: #fdf2d5; padding: 0.5em; display: flex; align-items: center; ">
<div class="ivmbox-image noresize" style="padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em;">40px ↗</div>
<div class="ivmbox-text">
Hello! Voting in the '''2024 Arbitration Committee elections ↗''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2024|end}}-1 day}}. All '''eligible users ↗''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee ↗ is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process ↗. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans ↗, topic bans ↗, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy ↗ describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates ↗ and submit your choices on the '''2024|poll}}|voting page ↗'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. <small>MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:26, 19 November 2024 (UTC)</small>

</div>
</div>

2025 Update from Women in Green

<div style="border: 6px solid #2bbf08; background: #FFF; background-color:#FFFFFF; color: #000000; padding: 1ex 1ex 1ex 1.5ex; margin: 0px 0px 1em 1em; font-size: 99%">
100px|right ↗
100px|right ↗
Hello {{<includeonly>safesubst:</includeonly>BASEPAGENAME}}:

2024 has wrapped up, and what a full year it was for WikiProject Women in Green ↗! Over the past year, we hosted two edit-a-thons, one themed around women's history ↗ and another on women around the world ↗. We also managed to achieve most of our 2024 annual goals ↗, nominating 75 articles for GA, reviewing 64 GA nominations, nominating 8 articles for FAC, peer reviewing 3 articles and reviewing 10 FAC nominations. Excellent work, and thank you to everyone involved!

For 2025 we have a new set of goals ↗ for nominations and reviews. In particular, we would like to see more articles on our Hot 100 list ↗ being improved and nominated for GA this year. If you take a look at the list and see an article you are interested in contributing to, feel free to add it and yourself to our Hot 100 project discussion ↗. You might even find someone interested in collaborating with you!

This year, as with every year, we hope you will join us in helping improve our coverage of women and women's works on this encyclopedia. Every contribution helps. We'll see you around!

Grnrchst (talk)

{{small|You are receiving this message as a member of the WikiProject Women in Green ↗. You can remove yourself from receiving notifications here ↗.}}

</div>

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 09:46, 3 January 2025 (UTC)

Good article reassessment for Alexander Zverev ↗

Alexander Zverev ↗ has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page ↗. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 17:17, 25 January 2025 (UTC)

Good article reassessment for Bianca Andreescu ↗

Bianca Andreescu ↗ has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page ↗. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 14:04, 26 February 2025 (UTC)

Women in Green's May 2025 edit-a-thon

<div style="border: 6px solid #2bbf08; background: #FFF; background-color:#FFFFFF; padding: 1ex 1ex 1ex 1.5ex; margin: 0px 0px 1em 1em; font-size: 99%">
100px|right ↗
Hello Sportsfan77777:
'''WikiProject Women in Green ↗''' is holding a ''' month-long Good Article Editathon event in May 2025 ↗'''!<br /><br />
Running from May 1 to 31, 2025, WikiProject Women in Green (WiG) is hosting a Good Article (GA) editathon event – Wildcard Edition! Participants are invited to work on nominating and/or reviewing GA submissions related to '''any and all''' women and women's works during the event period. Want to improve an article about a women's rights activist? Go for it. An Olympian gold medallist? Absolutely. A famous painting by a woman? Yes! GA resources and one-on-one support will be provided by experienced GA editors, and participants will have the opportunity to receive a special WiG barnstar for their efforts.
We hope to see you there!

<small>''(You are receiving this message as you are on the Women in Green mailing list ↗. If you wish to opt out of receiving future messages, feel free to remove yourself from the list.)''</small>
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:46, 28 March 2025 (UTC)
</div>

Precious anniversary

{{User QAIbox/auto|years=Six}}
--Gerda Arendt (talk) 18:21, 9 June 2025 (UTC)

Nomination of :Sagar Shah ↗ for deletion

<div class="afd-notice">
<div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0;">48px|alt=|link= ↗</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article :Sagar Shah ↗ is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines ↗ or whether it should be deleted ↗.

The article will be discussed at '''Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sagar Shah ↗''' until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.</div> Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 12:58, 19 June 2025 (UTC)

Nice timeline at Women in chess ↗

Seems like just hitting the thank button isn't enough. I have always been unhappy with the timeline, but didn't have the wherewithal to beef it up. Your additions include some that I had already yearned to see, e.g. Ellen Gilbert, and BTW thanks for citing sources for things that were already there, such as Chaudé de Silans.

Now it is perhaps even too long. Perhaps there should be separate lists for some things, e.g. 10th-20th-30th-40th women GMs, women breaking each other's records for youngest GM, whatever. You have probably already thought about this.

Seeing the entry about Ju Wenjun drawing with Ding Liren, I remembered that some years ago, Nino Batsiashvili drew a game with Carlsen in classical. It was noted in the online press and I can look it up for you if you don't already know about it. Do you know of the earliest game in which a woman drew with the reigning (open) WC? Bruce leverett (talk) 21:40, 8 July 2025 (UTC)

:Thanks!! Yeah, I think maybe it is a little bit too long, and I will think about if there is a way to improve the presentation. Sportsfan77777 (talk) 17:24, 9 July 2025 (UTC)
:Hmm, Judit drew Kramnik when he was World Champion (albeit during the split). I'm not sure if that's the first, although I'm leaning towards thinking it's not considered so significant. Sportsfan77777 (talk) 17:24, 9 July 2025 (UTC)

Women in Green's 9th Edit-a-thon

<div style="border: 6px solid #2bbf08; background: #FFF; background-color:#FFFFFF; padding: 1ex 1ex 1ex 1.5ex; margin: 0px 0px 1em 1em; font-size: 99%">
100px|right ↗
Hello Sportsfan77777:

'''WikiProject Women in Green ↗''' is holding a '''month-long Good Article Editathon event in October 2025 ↗'''!<br /><br />
Running from October 1 to 31, 2025, WikiProject Women in Green (WiG) is hosting a Good Article (GA) editathon event with the theme '''What Women Do'''! All experience levels welcome. Never worked on a GA project before? We'll teach you how to get started. Or maybe you're an old hand at GAs – we'd love to have you involved! Participants are invited to work on nominating and/or reviewing GA submissions related to women and women's works (e.g., books, films) during the event period. We hope to collectively cover article subjects from at least '''31 different occupations or professions''' (or broader roles in society) by month's end. GA resources and one-on-one support will be provided by experienced GA editors, and participants will have the opportunity to earn a special WiG barnstar for their efforts.

We hope to see you there!

Grnrchst (talk), Spookyaki (talk) & Alanna the Brave (talk)

{{small|You are receiving this message as a member of the WikiProject Women in Green ↗. You can remove yourself from receiving notifications here ↗.}}
</div>
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:38, 17 September 2025 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 26

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Daniel Naroditsky ↗, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Robert Hess ↗.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:01, 26 October 2025 (UTC)

Good article reassessment for Petra Kvitová ↗

Petra Kvitová ↗ has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page ↗. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 23:55, 3 November 2025 (UTC)

ArbCom 2025 Elections voter message

<div class="ivmbox " style="margin-bottom: 1em; border: 1px solid #a2a9b1; background-color: #fdf2d5; padding: 0.5em; display: flex; align-items: center; ">
<div class="ivmbox-image" style="padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em;flex-basis: 40px">40px ↗</div>
<div class="ivmbox-text">
Hello! Voting in the '''2025 Arbitration Committee elections ↗''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2025|end}}-1 day}}. All '''eligible users ↗''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee ↗ is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process ↗. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans ↗, topic bans ↗, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy ↗ describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please review the candidates ↗ and submit your choices on the '''2025|poll}}|voting page ↗'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. <small>MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:37, 18 November 2025 (UTC)</small>

</div>
</div>

Women in Green reviewing drive

<div style="border: 6px solid #2bbf08; background: #FFF; background-color:#FFFFFF; padding: 1ex 1ex 1ex 1.5ex; margin: 0px 0px 1em 1em; font-size: 99%">
100px|right ↗
Hello Sportsfan77777:

This month, February 2026, '''WikiProject Women in Green ↗''' is participating in the February 2026 GAN Backlog Drive ↗, in which we're aiming to review as many outstanding Good Article (GA) nominations about women and women's works as possible. If you want to help out, you can check out the project talk page ↗ for a list of nominations in need of review (including some WiG originals). If you haven't reviewed a GA nomination before, be sure to check out the reviewing instructions ↗ and guidelines ↗ and feel free to ask for a mentor ↗ to check your work.

We are also working together with a wikithon hosted on 5 February by Wikimedia UK, which will focus on writing and improving articles about women involved in sustainable development. If you want to join the event, feel free to sign up at the eventbrite page ↗; or if you would be interested in providing a 20-minute assessment and/or a full GA review of the submitted articles in the weeks following, put your name down on the project talk page ↗ for updates as the event progresses.

We hope to see you there!

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:05, 3 February 2026 (UTC)
</div>


{{-}}

Precious anniversary

{{User QAIbox/auto|years=Seven}}
--Gerda Arendt (talk) 10:10, 8 June 2026 (UTC)

Nomination of :Irina Zvereva ↗ for deletion

<div class="afd-notice">
<div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0;">48px|alt=|link= ↗</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article :Irina Zvereva ↗ is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines ↗ or whether it should be deleted ↗.

The article is being discussed at '''Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Irina Zvereva ↗''' until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines ↗.

Users may still edit the article ↗, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the AfD notice from the article until the discussion is closed.</div> T v ↗x ↗1 06:43, 13 June 2026 (UTC)