User Talk: Terot

Server-side rendered snapshot of this editor's Wikipedia talk page discussions.

'''Welcome!'''

Hello, {{PAGENAME}}, and welcome ↗ to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

The five pillars of Wikipedia ↗

How to edit a page ↗

Help pages ↗

Tutorial ↗

How to write a great article ↗

Manual of Style ↗

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian ↗! Please sign your name ↗ on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions ↗, ask me on my talk page, or place <code>{{helpme}}</code> on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! --Srleffler 00:20, 23 March 2006 (UTC)

I enjoyed your contribution at High Church Lutheranism ↗, and made some adjustments and additions. See what you think!--Srleffler 00:20, 23 March 2006 (UTC)

Hi. Re: Evangelical-Catholic ↗, is there a reason why you are adding categories to a redirect page? Redirects normally don't need to be categorized. (In fact, until recently the software did not even ''allow'' redirects to be categorized.)--Srleffler 22:43, 27 March 2006 (UTC)

Germany-related articles

Hi Terot,

I noticed you recently created a few Germany-related articles like Kirchliche Arbeit Alpirsbach ↗ and Heinrich Hansen ↗. I just wanted to inform you that you can announce any Germany-related articles you created at Portal:Germany/New articles ↗ and Portal:Germany/New article announcements ↗. Further, a WikiProject Germany is being started. If you're interested in contributing see User:Badbilltucker/WikiProject Germany and Wikipedia:WikiProject/List of proposed projects ↗. Thanks --Carabinieri <sup>T</sup><sub>T</sub><sup>a</sup><sub>a</sub><sup>l</sup><sub>l</sub><sup>k</sup><sub>k</sub> 14:21, 13 October 2006 (UTC)
==Edmund Tyrell Green ↗
Hi, Terot, I found the Date of Death on the fellow in question and edited the article to make it past tense. Cheers V. Joe 17:14, 11 December 2006 (UTC)

Michael Solomon Alexander

Well spotted - I'm merging them.--R613vlu 13:04, 19 December 2006 (UTC)

Johann Jacob Rambach article

{{Message_box|
id =Usrcvtext|
backgroundcolor =Pink|
image =Stop_hand.svg|
heading =Please don't add copyrighted text to Wikipedia|
message = We appreciate your contribution to the article Johann Jacob Rambach ↗, but we cannot accept copyrighted ↗ text borrowed from other web sites or printed material. Please see Wikipedia:Copyright problems ↗ for more information on this topic, or generally, Wikipedia:Policies and guidelines ↗. ''Please do not remove any copyright violation notice placed in the article or repost the suspected infringing text''.}}
—GrittyLobo441 16:33, 1 January 2007 (UTC)

"Category:Based on Schaff-Herzog Encyclopedia" proposed for deletion

A CfD has been called against :Category:Based on Schaff-Herzog Encyclopedia ↗ and most other "categories by source". (The categories are proposed for deletion, not the articles within them). If this category is useful to you, and you would prefer it not to be deleted, please comment at :Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2007_March_24#"By-source_categories" ↗. Jheald Jheald 15:41, 25 March 2007 (UTC)

Lutheranism

The WikiProject Lutheranism Collaboration Project ↗ is under way. Please help improve this month's article, or make a suggestion for next month's article. To add the collaboration banner to your userpage or talk page, use {{tl|Lutheran COTM}}. -- Pastordavid 19:31, 19 April 2007 (UTC)

Barnstars

Please offer your opinion on the two proposed Barnstars ↗ for WikiProject Lutheranism. '''Pastor David <sup>†</sup>''' <small><sub>(Review) ↗</sub></small> 18:25, 3 May 2007 (UTC)

New category

Many thanks for your hard work in creating :Category:Lutheran hymnwriters ↗. I'm afraid I've been a bit distracted lately by a new task force I've joined and haven't been putting my all in all into Lutheran category work. Thanks for pitching in! Fishal 21:10, 4 May 2007 (UTC)

Spelling of Lutheran names

I was going through the Lutherans mentioned in the book I referenced, and included the names as they were spelled there. I noted myself that on occasions this small-press book's spelling was at times erratic, but couldn't be sure that he was necessarily wrong, so went ahead with what I saw. Sorry for any spelling errors which creeped in. (For what it's worth, I actually won a five-state area award for vocabulary back in high school. I do note that some words, like "prosletyze", are ones I consistently screw up on. As that word has come up a lot in a recent discussion I've had, I made a comment on my poor spelling on that basis. But, in general, I try to ensure that I spell correctly, if I can verify the correct spelling. Except maybe on my user page. There, I am less interested in being correct than accurate, and spelling errors are something which I know can occasionally come up from me. But thank you for catching those errors, and helping ensure that mistakes don't stay in any articles too long.)John Carter 15:08, 5 May 2007 (UTC)

Award

Your dedication to creating new articles on Lutheran history and historical figures has more than earned you this...
{| style="border: 1px solid {{{border|gray}}}; background-color: {{{color|#fdffe7}}};"
|rowspan="2" valign="middle" | 100px ↗
|rowspan="2" |
|style="font-size: x-large; padding: 0; vertical-align: middle; height: 1.1em;" | '''The Barnstar of Indulgence'''
|-
|style="vertical-align: middle; border-top: 1px solid gray;" | In recognition of your dedication to increase the number and diversity of Lutheranism-related articles, I, Fishal, in Vollmacht aller Heiligen and under the auspices of the Lutheranism WikiProject ↗, award you this Barnstar of Indulgence. Fishal 21:37, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
|}

Regarding edits to Claus Harms ↗

Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia, Terot! However, your edit here ↗ was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove spam ↗ from Wikipedia. If you were trying to insert a good link, please accept my creator's apologies, but note that the link you added, matching rule \bangelfire\.com\/, is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. Please read Wikipedia's external links guidelines ↗ for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! Shadowbot 14:35, 4 June 2007 (UTC)

:Category:Former Lutherans ↗

You have recently recreated or reposted material {{ #if: Category:Former Lutherans | at :Category:Former Lutherans ↗}} which previously was deleted in accordance with Wikipedia's deletion policies ↗. Please do not recreate this article without prior approval from an administrator ↗ or '''you may be blocked ↗''' from editing. We ask that you respect what Wikipedia is not ↗. If you disagree with the article's deletion, you may seek an independent deletion review ↗.  The previous discussion for deletion of this article can be found here ↗. Thank you. - <span style="color:salmon;">'''Krakatoa'''</span><span style="color:teal;">Katie</span> 04:52, 13 June 2007 (UTC)

:Johann Franck ↗

left|40px ↗
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of :Johann Franck ↗, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.ccel.org/s/schaff/encyc/encyc04/htm/ii.ix.xii.htm. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 14:48, 29 February 2008 (UTC)

:This article about Johann Franck ↗ includes content derived from the Schaff-Herzog Encyclopedia of Religious Knowledge ↗, 1914, which is in the public domain. (Terot (talk) 14:55, 29 February 2008 (UTC))

CfD nomination of Category:Luther's works

left|48px| ↗''':Category:Luther's works ↗''', which you created, has been nominated for deletion ↗, merging ↗, or renaming ↗. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at '''the category's entry ↗''' on the Categories for discussion ↗ page. Thank you. – Good Ol’factory <sup>(talk)</sup> 05:35, 2 March 2008 (UTC)

Swedish heraldry

Thank you for your contributions to Swedish heraldry ↗ and its talk page ↗! Since I have made considerable expansions to the page, I would like to invite you to take a look over my work, and I will take another look at it as well after I take a few days' wikiholiday. Thanks! Wilhelm meis (talk) 06:54, 6 July 2008 (UTC)

Dates

Hello Terot! While for years I have linked full dates, there now seems to be a trend to delink them (WP:DATE#Dates ↗); that is why I removed the dates from the introduction of Johann Deutschmann ↗. Cheers! Olessi (talk) 03:15, 18 September 2008 (UTC)

Martin Bucer up for Featured Article Review

I just wanted to let you know that you can vote for or against Martin Bucer ↗ being the featured article at Wikipedia:Featured_article_candidates/Martin_Bucer#Martin_Bucer ↗. Thanks! --Epiphyllumlover (talk) 21:18, 13 April 2009 (UTC)

translation dispute

There is a discussion going on whether the name of that German church body can be translated or not (it appears like this on the english pages of this church's homepage). One user changed the name of this Church (actually a federation of several Lutheran, United and Reformed churches) and it's regional member churches to the German form because he says their names can't get translated. so the article on the Evangelical Lutheran Church in Bavaria now appears under its German name because he says the "concept" can't be translated into English. Please go to the discusson page of the Evangelical Church in Germany and have your say --93.130.249.56 ↗ (talk) 02:02, 3 March 2010 (UTC)

Mörlin

Hi Terot, I like your new article on Mörlin. Will you nominate it for DYK? --Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:11, 26 September 2010 (UTC)
: Hi Gerda, thank you for your suggestion. I am not familiar with the procedure, would you care to do it for me? (Terot (talk) 19:16, 27 September 2010 (UTC))
::I looked and see a problem I had overlooked: articles for DYK have to be referenced by footnotes. If you want to do that, the procedure to nominate is simple: you pick a fact that looks interesting to the general public, word it in no more than 150 characters and reference it with a reliable source. Then you go to Main page and click "nominate an article" below the current "hooks" and take it from there, you may add a picture. It's just filling three fields in a template. Perhaps you want to write your next article with footnotes from the start rather than adding to this one? Template:Cite web ↗ is recommended. Good luck. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 21:14, 27 September 2010 (UTC)
:::Thanks! Is it only for new articles, or is it possible to nominate one of my old articles as well? (Terot (talk) 16:06, 28 September 2010 (UTC))
::::Yesterday I answered in length, but forgot to save, sorry. Now, with less time: it's for articles not older than 5 days or expanded 5-fold within that time frame. I recommend to look at the suggestion page (s.a.) and get familiar with the process, watching how suggestions are sometimes questioned, then approved ... interesting reading! Then I would go for the next article and reference it from the start. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 12:28, 29 September 2010 (UTC)

''Ichthus'': January 2012

<div style="font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;">
{| style="text-align:center; border:10px solid black; background-color:black; width:100%;"
|-
|center|55px ↗
|- padding:15em;padding-top:5em;"
|style="font-size: 350%; color:gold; "|<br>'''<big>I</big>CHTHUS''' <br><br>
|- padding:15em;padding-top:5em;"
|style="color:gold;"|'''January 2012'''
|}
<div style="background-color:#FFF; font-size: 120%;font-weight:bold;">
''In this issue...'' <br />

From the Editor ↗

What are You doing For Lent? ↗

Fun and Exciting Contest Launched ↗

Spotlight on WikiProject Catholicism ↗

</div>
-----
<div class="center"><small>''Ichthus'' is the newsletter of Christianity on Wikipedia • It is published by WikiProject Christianity ↗<br>For submissions contact the Newsroom ↗ • To unsubscribe add yourself to the list here ↗</small></div>
</div>

Terveisiä

Moikka ja rauhaa! Tällä on englanninkielinen artikkeli Suomen Anglikaanisesta kirkosta ↗. – Kaihsu (talk) 15:03, 15 April 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 10

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Mathesius ↗, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Finnish ↗ (check to confirm ↗ | fix with Dab solver ↗). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. <small>Read the FAQ{{*}} Join us at the DPL WikiProject ↗.</small>

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:12, 10 December 2012 (UTC)

Lutheran Rev Article Review

Rev Jordahl Article Peer Review

Hello! I see you have done a lot of work on Lutheran WP articles. I thought perhaps you could do a peer review ↗ on this article? Thanks!

Article: '''V. Trygve Jordahl ↗'''

Nasa-verve (talk) 22:21, 16 July 2013 (UTC)

Opinion

Hi, i would like to have your opinion about a discussion which i started here ↗, thank.Kingroyos (talk) 23:32, 27 May 2014 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open! ↗

{{Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2015/MassMessage}} MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:51, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016 ↗: Voting now open!

{{Ivmbox|Hello, Terot. Voting in the '''2016 Arbitration Committee elections ↗''' is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee ↗ is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process ↗. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans ↗, topic bans ↗, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy ↗ describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements ↗ and submit your choices on '''the voting page ↗'''. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
|Scale of justice 2.svg|imagesize=40px}}

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

{{Ivmbox|Hello, Terot. Voting in the '''2018 Arbitration Committee elections ↗''' is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee ↗ is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process ↗. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans ↗, topic bans ↗, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy ↗ describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates ↗ and submit your choices on the '''voting page ↗'''. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
|Scale of justice 2.svg|imagesize=40px}}

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

<table class="messagebox " style="border: 1px solid #AAA; background: ivory; padding: 0.5em; width: 100%;">
<tr><td style="vertical-align:middle; padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em;">40px ↗</td><td>Hello! Voting in the '''2019 Arbitration Committee elections ↗''' is now open until 23:59 on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2019|end}}-1 day}}. All '''eligible users ↗''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee ↗ is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process ↗. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans ↗, topic bans ↗, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy ↗ describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates ↗ and submit your choices on the '''2019|poll}}|voting page ↗'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:07, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
</td></tr>
</table>

Nomination of :Frank Senn ↗ for deletion

<div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">48px|alt=|link= ↗</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ''':Frank Senn ↗''' is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines ↗ or whether it should be deleted ↗.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Frank Senn ↗ until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. '''<span style="color:#0000FF;">I-82-I</span> <span style="color:#0000FF;">|</span> <span style="color:#0000FF;">TALK</span> ↗''' 22:17, 25 July 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 4

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages ↗. Such links are usually incorrect ↗, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. <small>(Read the FAQ{{*}} Join us at the DPL WikiProject ↗.)</small>
:Cole Escola ↗
::added a link pointing to Finnish ↗
:Elizabeth McLaughlin ↗
::added a link pointing to Finnish ↗
:Victoria Moroles ↗
::added a link pointing to Finnish ↗

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:27, 4 September 2020 (UTC)

September 2020

25px|alt=Information icon ↗ Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced ↗ information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living (or recently deceased) persons ↗, as you did to :Joel McHale ↗. ''<br>Please do not cite "Ethnicelebs" as a source of biographical information. The site is unreliable because according to its own ToS page ↗ (section 5), it makes no guarantee for the accuracy of its content. In line with WP:BLPSOURCES ↗, biographies of living people must employ a high standard of sourcing.'' <b style="color: #FF0F00;">Super</b><b style="color: #FF3F00;">Mario</b><b style="color: #FF6F00;">Man</b> ↗ (Talk) 21:01, 4 September 2020 (UTC)

:Fair enough. But as a genealogist I don't understand what is cntroversial about it. Or has it got something to do with the recent race riots in America? (Terot (talk) 22:13, 4 September 2020 (UTC))
::That is not a very good way to respond. I was planning to do the same on your edit for Liza Weil as the source was overall poor (and also because the subject herself has never talked publically about her ancestreal heritage outside her immediate family). The reason for the reversions was '''solely''' BLPSOURCE, not an odd vendetta involving our racial justice situation. Assume good faith ↗ from now on. <span style="font-family: Roboto;">'''<span style="color:royalblue4">Nate</span>''' <span style="color:#00008B">•</span> <small>''(<span style="color:#B8860B">chatter</span> ↗)''</small></span> 01:48, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
:::I assume good faith, you do the same :-) (Terot (talk) 02:12, 5 September 2020 (UTC))

Speedy deletion ↗ nomination of :Category:Norvind family ↗

48px|left|alt=|link= ↗

A tag has been placed on :Category:Norvind family ↗ requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion ↗, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category ↗, a category redirect ↗, a featured topics category ↗, under discussion at Categories for discussion ↗, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may '''contest the nomination''' by visiting the page ↗ and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines ↗.   <span style="font-family:Papyrus; color:#800080;">'''''L'''''iz</span> <sup style="font-family: Times New Roman; color: #006400;">'''''Read!''''' ↗ '''''Talk!'''''</sup> 14:17, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
:It can be deleted. (Terot (talk) 16:01, 5 September 2020 (UTC))

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

<table class="messagebox " style="border: 1px solid #AAA; background: ivory; padding: 0.5em; width: 100%;">
<tr><td style="vertical-align:middle; padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em;">40px ↗</td><td>Hello! Voting in the '''2020 Arbitration Committee elections ↗''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2020|end}}-1 day}}. All '''eligible users ↗''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee ↗ is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process ↗. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans ↗, topic bans ↗, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy ↗ describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates ↗ and submit your choices on the '''2020|poll}}|voting page ↗'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:31, 24 November 2020 (UTC)
</td></tr>
</table>

:Category:Norvind acting family ↗ has been nominated for renaming

<div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">48px|alt=|link= ↗</div>''':Category:Norvind acting family ↗''' has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization ↗ guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at '''the category's entry ↗''' on the categories for discussion ↗ page. Thank you. Mike Selinker (talk) 01:51, 6 November 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

<table class="messagebox " style="border: 1px solid #AAA; background: ivory; padding: 0.5em; width: 100%;">
<tr><td style="vertical-align:middle; padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em;">40px ↗</td><td>Hello! Voting in the '''2021 Arbitration Committee elections ↗''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2021|end}}-1 day}}. All '''eligible users ↗''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee ↗ is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process ↗. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans ↗, topic bans ↗, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy ↗ describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates ↗ and submit your choices on the '''2021|poll}}|voting page ↗'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. <small>MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:12, 23 November 2021 (UTC)</small>
</td></tr>
</table>

:Category:Norvind acting family ↗ has been nominated for renaming

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

<div class="ivmbox " style="margin-bottom: 1em; border: 1px solid #AAA; background-color: ivory; padding: 0.5em; display: flex; align-items: center; ">
<div class="ivmbox-image" style="padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em; flex: 1 0 40px;">40px ↗</div>
<div class="ivmbox-text">
Hello! Voting in the '''2022 Arbitration Committee elections ↗''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2022|end}}-1 day}}. All '''eligible users ↗''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee ↗ is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process ↗. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans ↗, topic bans ↗, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy ↗ describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates ↗ and submit your choices on the '''2022|poll}}|voting page ↗'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. <small>MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:33, 29 November 2022 (UTC)</small>

</div>
</div>

":Liturgical renewal ↗" listed at Redirects for discussion ↗

30px ↗
The redirect <span class="plainlinks">[//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Liturgical_renewal&redirect=no Liturgical renewal]</span> has been listed at redirects for discussion ↗ to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines ↗. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at {{slink|Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 February 15#Liturgical renewal}} until a consensus is reached.  Veverve (talk) 22:52, 15 February 2023 (UTC)

":Lord’s Supper ↗" listed at Redirects for discussion ↗

30px ↗
The redirect <span class="plainlinks">[//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Lord%E2%80%99s_Supper&redirect=no Lord’s Supper]</span> has been listed at redirects for discussion ↗ to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines ↗. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at {{slink|Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 March 7#Lord’s Supper}} until a consensus is reached.  Veverve (talk) 23:59, 7 March 2023 (UTC)

November 2023

25px|alt=Information icon ↗ Hello, I'm Veverve. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, :Holy Name of Jesus ↗, but you didn't provide a reliable source ↗. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation ↗ and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners ↗. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you.  Veverve (talk) 07:59, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
:All right, thanks for letting me know. (Terot (talk) 21:22, 25 November 2023 (UTC))

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

<div class="ivmbox " style="margin-bottom: 1em; border: 1px solid #AAA; background-color: ivory; padding: 0.5em; display: flex; align-items: center; ">
<div class="ivmbox-image" style="padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em; flex: 1 0 40px; max-width: 100px">40px ↗</div>
<div class="ivmbox-text">
Hello! Voting in the '''2023 Arbitration Committee elections ↗''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2023|end}}-1 day}}. All '''eligible users ↗''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee ↗ is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process ↗. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans ↗, topic bans ↗, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy ↗ describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates ↗ and submit your choices on the '''2023|poll}}|voting page ↗'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. <small>MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:28, 28 November 2023 (UTC)</small>

</div>
</div>

":Unio personalis ↗" listed at Redirects for discussion ↗

30px ↗
The redirect <span class="plainlinks">[//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Unio_personalis&redirect=no Unio personalis]</span> has been listed at redirects for discussion ↗ to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines ↗. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at '''{{slink|Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 August 10#Unio personalis}}''' until a consensus is reached.  1234qwer 1234qwer 4 ↗ 15:11, 10 August 2024 (UTC)

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

<div class="ivmbox " style="margin-bottom: 1em; border: 1px solid #a2a9b1; background-color: #fdf2d5; padding: 0.5em; display: flex; align-items: center; ">
<div class="ivmbox-image noresize" style="padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em;">40px ↗</div>
<div class="ivmbox-text">
Hello! Voting in the '''2024 Arbitration Committee elections ↗''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2024|end}}-1 day}}. All '''eligible users ↗''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee ↗ is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process ↗. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans ↗, topic bans ↗, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy ↗ describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates ↗ and submit your choices on the '''2024|poll}}|voting page ↗'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. <small>MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:11, 19 November 2024 (UTC)</small>

</div>
</div>

Speedy deletion ↗ nomination of :The Necromancers ↗

48px|left|alt=|link= ↗
{{Quote box|quote=<p>If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article ↗.</p><p>You may want to consider using the Article Wizard ↗ to help you create articles.</p>|width=20%|align=right}}
A tag has been placed on :The Necromancers ↗ requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion ↗, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement ↗. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://thegothicwanderer.wordpress.com/2015/10/15/the-necromancers-a-pro-catholic-gothic-novel/<nowiki> </nowiki>and https://www.industriousfamily.com/the-necromancers.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of ''information'', but not as a source of ''sentences''. This part is crucial: ''say it in your own words''. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators '''will be blocked from editing ↗'''.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you ''must'' verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials ↗. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission ↗ for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy ↗ for more details, or ask a question here ↗.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may '''contest the nomination''' by visiting the page ↗ and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines ↗.  Fram (talk) 08:23, 2 May 2025 (UTC)

Speedy deletion ↗ nomination of :On the Incarnation ↗

48px|left|alt=|link= ↗
{{Quote box|quote=<p>If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article ↗.</p><p>You may want to consider using the Article Wizard ↗ to help you create articles.</p>|width=20%|align=right}}
A tag has been placed on :On the Incarnation ↗ requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion ↗, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement ↗. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://where-you-are.net/books/english/audio-books/st-athanasius-the-incarnation-of-the-word-oratio-de-incarnatione-verbi<nowiki> </nowiki>and https://www.thegospelcoalition.org/reviews/on-incarnation/. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of ''information'', but not as a source of ''sentences''. This part is crucial: ''say it in your own words''. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators '''will be blocked from editing ↗'''.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you ''must'' verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials ↗. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission ↗ for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy ↗ for more details, or ask a question here ↗.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may '''contest the nomination''' by visiting the page ↗ and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines ↗.  Fram (talk) 08:29, 2 May 2025 (UTC)

Speedy deletion ↗ nomination of :The Catholic Church and Conversion ↗

48px|left|alt=|link= ↗
{{Quote box|quote=<p>If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article ↗.</p><p>You may want to consider using the Article Wizard ↗ to help you create articles.</p>|width=20%|align=right}}
A tag has been placed on :The Catholic Church and Conversion ↗ requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion ↗, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement ↗. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://www.chesterton.org/lecture-49/<nowiki> </nowiki>and https://www.thefreelibrary.com/G.+K.+Chesterton.-a0268401849. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of ''information'', but not as a source of ''sentences''. This part is crucial: ''say it in your own words''. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators '''will be blocked from editing ↗'''.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you ''must'' verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials ↗. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission ↗ for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy ↗ for more details, or ask a question here ↗.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may '''contest the nomination''' by visiting the page ↗ and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines ↗.  Fram (talk) 08:32, 2 May 2025 (UTC)

Speedy deletion ↗ nomination of :Saint Thomas Aquinas (Chesterton) ↗

48px|left|alt=|link= ↗
{{Quote box|quote=<p>If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article ↗.</p><p>You may want to consider using the Article Wizard ↗ to help you create articles.</p>|width=20%|align=right}}
A tag has been placed on :Saint Thomas Aquinas (Chesterton) ↗ requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion ↗, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement ↗. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://www.chesterton.org/lecture-67/. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of ''information'', but not as a source of ''sentences''. This part is crucial: ''say it in your own words''. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators '''will be blocked from editing ↗'''.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you ''must'' verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials ↗. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission ↗ for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy ↗ for more details, or ask a question here ↗.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may '''contest the nomination''' by visiting the page ↗ and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines ↗.  Fram (talk) 08:34, 2 May 2025 (UTC)

Speedy deletion ↗ nomination of :Analogy of Religion ↗

48px|left|alt=|link= ↗
{{Quote box|quote=<p>If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article ↗.</p><p>You may want to consider using the Article Wizard ↗ to help you create articles.</p>|width=20%|align=right}}
A tag has been placed on :Analogy of Religion ↗ requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion ↗, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement ↗. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://www.scribd.com/doc/73700753/Philosophy-and-the-Christian-Faith. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of ''information'', but not as a source of ''sentences''. This part is crucial: ''say it in your own words''. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators '''will be blocked from editing ↗'''.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you ''must'' verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials ↗. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission ↗ for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy ↗ for more details, or ask a question here ↗.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may '''contest the nomination''' by visiting the page ↗ and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines ↗.  Fram (talk) 08:35, 2 May 2025 (UTC)

Wikipedia and copyright

30px|link=|alt=Control copyright icon ↗ Hello Terot! While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, it's important to understand and adhere to guidelines about using information from sources to prevent copyright ↗ and plagiarism ↗ issues. Here are the key points:

'''Limited quotation:''' You may only copy or translate a ''small'' portion of a source. Any direct quotations ↗ must be enclosed in double quotation mark ↗s (") and properly cited using an inline citation ↗. More information is available on the non-free content page ↗. To learn how to cite a source, see Help:Referencing for beginners ↗.

'''Paraphrasing:''' Beyond limited quotations, you are required to put all information ''in your own words''. Following the source's wording too closely can lead to copyright issues ↗ and is not permitted; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing ↗. Even when paraphrasing, you must still cite your sources ↗ as appropriate.

'''Image use guidelines:''' In most scenarios, only freely licensed ↗ or public domain ↗ images may be used and these should be uploaded to our sister project, Wikimedia Commons ↗. In some scenarios, non-freely copyrighted content can be used if they meet all ten of our non-free content criteria ↗; Wikipedia:Plain and simple non-free content guide ↗ may help with determining a file's eligibility.

'''Copyrighted material donation:''' If ''you'' hold the copyright to the content you want to copy, or are a legally designated agent, you ''may'' be able to license the text for publication here. Please see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials ↗.

'''Copying and translation within Wikipedia:''' Wikipedia articles can be copied or translated, however they must have proper attribution in accordance with Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia ↗. For translation, see {{section link|Help:Translation|Licensing}}.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices. Persistent failure to comply may result in being blocked ↗ from editing. If you have any questions or need further clarification, please ask them here on this page, or leave a message on my talk page. Thank you.  Whpq (talk) 13:27, 2 May 2025 (UTC)
: Thanks! (Terot (talk) 19:24, 2 May 2025 (UTC))

Nomination of :The Catholic Church and Conversion ↗ for deletion

<div class="afd-notice">
<div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0;">48px|alt=|link= ↗</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article :The Catholic Church and Conversion ↗ is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines ↗ or whether it should be deleted ↗.

The article will be discussed at '''Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Catholic Church and Conversion ↗''' until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.</div> Reaper Eternal (talk) 00:57, 3 May 2025 (UTC)

Autopatrolled

Hello Terot. This is just to let you know that I've removed the autopatrolled ↗ flag from your account: because of the recent copyright violations, I think it would be best for your articles to go through the usual new page patrol ↗ process for the time being. This won't affect you at all—it just means that when you create a new article, someone else will look at it to make sure it's all right. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 04:43, 3 May 2025 (UTC)
: Thanks! (Terot (talk) 13:36, 3 May 2025 (UTC))

Nomination of :St Benedict Patron of Europe Association ↗ for deletion

<div class="afd-notice">
<div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0;">48px|alt=|link= ↗</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article :St Benedict Patron of Europe Association ↗ is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines ↗ or whether it should be deleted ↗.

The article will be discussed at '''Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/St Benedict Patron of Europe Association ↗''' until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.</div> Dclemens1971 (talk) 15:59, 18 August 2025 (UTC)

ArbCom 2025 Elections voter message

<div class="ivmbox " style="margin-bottom: 1em; border: 1px solid #a2a9b1; background-color: #fdf2d5; padding: 0.5em; display: flex; align-items: center; ">
<div class="ivmbox-image" style="padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em;flex-basis: 40px">40px ↗</div>
<div class="ivmbox-text">
Hello! Voting in the '''2025 Arbitration Committee elections ↗''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2025|end}}-1 day}}. All '''eligible users ↗''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee ↗ is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process ↗. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans ↗, topic bans ↗, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy ↗ describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please review the candidates ↗ and submit your choices on the '''2025|poll}}|voting page ↗'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. <small>MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:22, 18 November 2025 (UTC)</small>

</div>
</div>