User Talk: ThunderBrine

Server-side rendered snapshot of this editor's Wikipedia talk page discussions.

Welcome!

Hello, ThunderBrine, and welcome ↗ to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions ↗. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits to the page :Canon (fiction) ↗ have not conformed to Wikipedia's '''verifiability policy ↗''', and has been or will be removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or in other media. Always remember to provide a '''reliable source ↗''' for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research ↗ in articles. Additionally, all new biographies of living people ↗ must contain at least one reliable source.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the '''guide for citing sources ↗''' or come to the '''new contributors' help page ↗''', where experienced Wikipedians ↗ can answer any queries you have! Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

The five pillars of Wikipedia ↗

Contributing to Wikipedia ↗

How to edit a page ↗

Help pages ↗

Tutorial ↗

How to write a great article ↗

Simplified Manual of Style ↗

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name ↗ on talk pages using four tildes (<nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions ↗, ask me on User talk:BilCat{{!}}my talk page, or {{edit|Special:MyTalk|ask a question on your talk page|section=new|preload=Help:Contents/helpmepreload|preloadtitle=Help me!}}.  Again, welcome.  BilCat (talk) 00:11, 22 February 2018 (UTC)

Warning

December 2024

25px|alt=Warning icon ↗ Please stop. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced ↗ content, as you did at :Jack of all trades ↗, you may be blocked from editing ↗. ''The figure of speech is just "Jack of all trades, master of none".'' Belbury (talk) 08:22, 22 December 2024 (UTC)

:Sorry. I was under the impression that the phrase was common knowledge. I sometimes see it in articles and merchandising. I could share some if that would help.
:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7359846/
:https://www.codeandquill.com/blogs/ampersand/why-jack-of-all-trades?srsltid=AfmBOorGvrPzQT0PUSp7XwfcDjFnLB_YrsrVe2thcg2FdRVEFsZCDtSJ
:https://medium.com/know-thyself-heal-thyself/jack-of-all-trades-master-of-none-c4cb84bbd84b
:https://www.teepublic.com/magnet/6485389-jack-of-all-trades-master-of-none
:--'''''ThunderBrine''''' (talk; contributions ↗; watchlist ↗; sandbox) 21:55, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
::The "but oftentimes master of none" version definitely exists as a minor, recent variant of the phrase, but it's not the primary or original version. Belbury (talk) 08:06, 23 December 2024 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections voter message

2021

<table class="messagebox " style="border: 1px solid #AAA; background: ivory; padding: 0.5em; width: 100%;">
<tr><td style="vertical-align:middle; padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em;">40px ↗</td><td>Hello! Voting in the '''2021 Arbitration Committee elections ↗''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2021|end}}-1 day}}. All '''eligible users ↗''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee ↗ is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process ↗. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans ↗, topic bans ↗, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy ↗ describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates ↗ and submit your choices on the '''2021|poll}}|voting page ↗'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. <small>MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:55, 23 November 2021 (UTC)</small>
</td></tr>
</table>

2022

<div class="ivmbox " style="margin-bottom: 1em; border: 1px solid #AAA; background-color: ivory; padding: 0.5em; display: flex; align-items: center; ">
<div class="ivmbox-image" style="padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em; flex: 1 0 40px;">40px ↗</div>
<div class="ivmbox-text">
Hello! Voting in the '''2022 Arbitration Committee elections ↗''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2022|end}}-1 day}}. All '''eligible users ↗''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee ↗ is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process ↗. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans ↗, topic bans ↗, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy ↗ describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates ↗ and submit your choices on the '''2022|poll}}|voting page ↗'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. <small>MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:35, 29 November 2022 (UTC)</small>

</div>
</div>

2023

<div class="ivmbox " style="margin-bottom: 1em; border: 1px solid #AAA; background-color: ivory; padding: 0.5em; display: flex; align-items: center; ">
<div class="ivmbox-image" style="padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em; flex: 1 0 40px; max-width: 100px">40px ↗</div>
<div class="ivmbox-text">
Hello! Voting in the '''2023 Arbitration Committee elections ↗''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2023|end}}-1 day}}. All '''eligible users ↗''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee ↗ is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process ↗. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans ↗, topic bans ↗, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy ↗ describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates ↗ and submit your choices on the '''2023|poll}}|voting page ↗'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. <small>MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:48, 28 November 2023 (UTC)</small>

</div>
</div>

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

<div class="ivmbox " style="margin-bottom: 1em; border: 1px solid #a2a9b1; background-color: #fdf2d5; padding: 0.5em; display: flex; align-items: center; ">
<div class="ivmbox-image noresize" style="padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em;">40px ↗</div>
<div class="ivmbox-text">
Hello! Voting in the '''2024 Arbitration Committee elections ↗''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2024|end}}-1 day}}. All '''eligible users ↗''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee ↗ is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process ↗. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans ↗, topic bans ↗, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy ↗ describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates ↗ and submit your choices on the '''2024|poll}}|voting page ↗'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. <small>MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:39, 19 November 2024 (UTC)</small>

</div>
</div>

Fiction

February 2018

25px|alt=Information icon ↗ Welcome to Wikipedia ↗. We appreciate your contributions ↗, including your edits to :Canon (fiction) ↗, but we cannot accept original research ↗. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say ↗. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source ↗ for all of your contributions. Thank you. BilCat (talk) 00:11, 22 February 2018 (UTC)

Fastest animals ↗

May 2020

25px|alt=Information icon ↗ Hi ThunderBrine! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor at :Fastest animals ↗ that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia — it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections ↗ or reverting obvious vandalism ↗. Any edit that changes the ''meaning'' of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit ↗ for more information. Thank you.  Meters (talk) 04:30, 30 May 2020 (UTC)

25px|alt=Information icon ↗ Hello, I'm Meters. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, :Fastest animals ↗, but you didn't provide a reliable source ↗. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation ↗ and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources ↗. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. ''Did you even read the source you added? That was a '''record''' speed, not the speed of an average human.''  Meters (talk) 04:31, 30 May 2020 (UTC)

:I'm sorry for not reading the source I gave more thouroughly. I will have to search for the average speed in body lengths for a human from other sources. In the meantime, I would like to ask: What is your opinion on me putting the relative speed for these animals? ThunderBrine (talk) 00:08, 5 June 2020 (UTC)

June 2020

25px|alt=Information icon ↗ Please do not add or change content, as you did at :Fastest animals ↗, without citing a reliable source ↗. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources ↗ and take this opportunity to add references to the article. ''Please stop adding your calculated relative speeds. We don't edit Wikipedia based on editors' assumptions, and some of your assumptions are clearly incorrect.'' Meters (talk) 03:19, 22 June 2020 (UTC)

Colors

Disambiguation link notification for February 5

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Shades of red ↗, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Orange ↗. Such links are usually incorrect ↗, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. <small>(Read the FAQ{{*}} Join us at the DPL WikiProject ↗.)</small>

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:10, 5 February 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 27

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Shades of blue ↗, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Azure ↗.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:25, 27 February 2021 (UTC)

Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution

25px|alt=Information icon ↗ Thank you for your contributions ↗ to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from one or more pages into :Shades of red ↗. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing ↗ does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary ↗ at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking ↗ to the copied page, e.g., <code>copied content from <nowiki>page name ↗</nowiki>; see that page's history for attribution</code>. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{tl|copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia ↗. Thank you.  If you are the sole author of the prose that was copied or moved, attribution is not required. — Diannaa (talk) 13:41, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
:I will try to be more attentive when copying similar material into other pages. ThunderBrine (talk) 22:31, 16 February 2021 (UTC)

Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution (2nd request)

25px|alt=Information icon ↗ Thank you for your contributions ↗ to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from :Shades of green ↗ into :Shades of chartreuse ↗. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing ↗ does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary ↗ at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking ↗ to the copied page, e.g., <code>copied content from <nowiki>page name ↗</nowiki>; see that page's history for attribution</code>. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{tl|copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia ↗. Thank you.  — Diannaa (talk) 12:54, 16 February 2021 (UTC)

Warning

Hey there User:ThunderBrine, just a warning, the recent edit you did to Shades of azure ↗ was not helpful, please don't Vandalize our encyclopedia ↗ continuing will result a block ↗, please and thank you.
Lucky10 <small>(Userpage)</small> (<small>Lets talk!</small>) 19:27, 15 February 2021 (UTC) Reply with <nowiki>{{Ping|10-Is-Lucky}}</nowiki> or leave a message!
:Hello User:10-Is-Lucky, I would like to explain my thought process for the recent changes to the color pages. I have relocated the colors not within the hue range of 195 and 225, as those colors are not truly azure. I based this conclusion on mathematical proximity. I hope you will not penalize me if I perform these edits any further.
:While we are on the topic of bans, is it possible to get my ban repealed by you or another wiki editor?ThunderBrine (talk) 19:57, 15 February 2021 (UTC)

Discussion

ThunderBrine (talk) 20:25, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
In order to prevent a ban from the wikipedia staff, I will explain myself. I have been going through all the primary (red, green, blue), secondary (yellow, cyan, magenta), and tertiary colors (orange, chartreuse, spring green, azure, violet, rose) and have been giving them their own shade pages and templates, as well as editing others to coincide with the new creations. I do not think I will editing the arbitrary color pages (brown, purple, pink), and will only be the ones where I feel concrete and certain.

If red as a primary color is allowed attention, then it surely follows that green and blue get the same treatment. If yellow as a secondary color is allowed attention, then it surely follows that cyan and magenta get the same treatment. If orange as a tertiary color is allowed attention, then it surely follows that chartreuse, spring green, azure, violet and rose get the same treatment.

I created this paragraph detailing how each color should be categorized:
''"In a color proximity sense, a primary color has a color range of 120° (60° on each side of the color's hue) and any color has to be within that range to be considered a variation of that color. Secondary colors have a color range of 60° (30°), tertiary colors have a color range of 30° (15°), quaternary colors have a color range of 15° (7.5°), quinary colors have a color range of 7.5° (3.75°), and so on."''
:A load of WP:OR ↗, with no actual sources to back it up. I have removed all those sections, and think some of these attempts at additional articles should be merged. Hate to tell you this, but color definitions are ''not'' mathematical, and do not constitute equal slices of a pie. "Spring green", for example, is a shade of green as culturally defined (hence the name) and belongs in that article, not a separate one. In fact, the idea that all must be equal segments of the color wheel is completely incorrect and invalid. oknazevad (talk) 17:28, 13 January 2022 (UTC)

:Color classification is no longer purely cultural in nature.
:Colors are mathematical and scientific, and to suggest otherwise would be not only arbitrary, but a disservice to the study of colors. The RGB color wheel was made by Issac Newton in 1666 when studying optics, and the most modern form of the CMYK color wheel was created by a painter, Jacob Christoph Le Blon in 1719, by using an adaptation of the RGB color wheel.
:The concept of a color having a dedicated angle number to it's hue is not something that was simply made up. Each color can be subcategorized to an mathematical infinite degree through the equal slices of the color wheel, or pie. For example, Veronica is a subset of Indigo, which is a subset of Violet, which is a subset of Blue. This information was easily gathered by looking as a color, the quinary color Veronica, and going up it's classificationary roots like you would classify life of an animal, like how a human would go from Homo Sapien Sapien to Primates to Mammalia.
:Orange is "just a shade of red", and violet is "just a shade of blue", yet the reason why people treat spring green differently (including you, possibly) is because we haven't created an arbitrary name to differentiate it from its primary color family, even when all three colors are in the same situation. If spring green were to be treated this way, we would have to treat the other tertiary colors the same; The Orange article would be deleted, and it's assets would be relocated appropriately to the Red and Yellow pages, Violet would be dissolved into Blue and Magenta.
:We as Wikipedia editors should deliver an intellectual resource to consumers in a consistent fashion. ThunderBrine (talk) 03:56, 14 January 2022 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 19

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Shades of green ↗, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Chartreuse ↗ and Aquamarine ↗.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 19 August 2021 (UTC)

Nomination for merger of :Template:Shades of rose ↗

30px|alt=|link= ↗:Template:Shades of rose ↗ has been nominated for merging ↗ with Template:Shades of pink ↗. You are invited to comment on the discussion at '''the template's entry''' on the Templates for discussion page ↗. Thank you. <span style="border:1px solid;background:#800080"><span style="color:#FFCC00">p</span><span style="color:#FFCC00;">b</span><span style="color:#FFCC00;">p</span></span> 22:45, 23 September 2021 (UTC)

Nomination for merger of :Template:Shades of azure ↗

30px|alt=|link= ↗:Template:Shades of azure ↗ has been nominated for merging ↗ with Template:Shades of blue ↗. You are invited to comment on the discussion at '''the template's entry''' on the Templates for discussion page ↗. Thank you. <span style="border:1px solid;background:#800080"><span style="color:#FFCC00">p</span><span style="color:#FFCC00;">b</span><span style="color:#FFCC00;">p</span></span> 22:49, 23 September 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion ↗ nomination of :Category:Shades of rose ↗

48px|left|alt=|link= ↗

A tag has been placed on :Category:Shades of rose ↗ indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category ↗, a category redirect ↗, a featured topics category ↗, under discussion at Categories for discussion ↗, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion ↗.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may '''contest the nomination''' by visiting the page ↗ and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself.   <span style="font-family:Papyrus; color:#800080;">'''''L'''''iz</span> <sup style="font-family: Times New Roman; color: #006400;">'''''Read!''''' ↗ '''''Talk!'''''</sup> 16:39, 20 October 2021 (UTC)

Edit Summaries

April 2021

25px|alt=Information icon|link= ↗ Hello. Thank you for your contributions ↗ to Wikipedia ↗.
{{The edit-summary field}}
Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries ↗ are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.
Edit summary content is visible in:
{{Div col|colwidth=20em}}

User contributions ↗

Recent changes ↗

Watchlist ↗s

Revision diffs ↗

IRC channels ↗

Related changes ↗

New pages list ↗

Article editing history ↗

{{Div col end}}
Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. With a Wikipedia account ↗ you can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting {{myprefs|3|check=Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary}}.
Thanks! Rsk6400 (talk) 07:21, 26 April 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 9

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Quartz ↗, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Citrine ↗.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:11, 9 March 2024 (UTC)

Problems with upload of File:SuitEagles.png

Thanks for uploading ''':File:SuitEagles.png ↗'''. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link ↗, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions ↗.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Wikipedia:Image use policy ↗

Wikipedia:Image copyright tags ↗

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 21:30, 16 August 2024 (UTC)

Problems with upload of File:SuitRoyals.png

Thanks for uploading ''':File:SuitRoyals.png ↗'''. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link ↗, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions ↗.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Wikipedia:Image use policy ↗

Wikipedia:Image copyright tags ↗

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 21:30, 16 August 2024 (UTC)

File copyright problem with File:SuitEagles.png

64px|left|alt=|link= ↗
Thank you for uploading :File:SuitEagles.png ↗. However, it is currently missing information on its '''copyright''' and '''licensing''' status. Wikipedia takes copyright ↗ very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can verify that it has an acceptable license status and a verifiable source. Please add this information by editing the image description page ↗. You may refer to the '''image use policy ↗''' to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on '''copyright tags ↗''' may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion ↗ and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads ↗.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page ↗. Thanks again for your cooperation. 🔹<span style="color:#3457D5;">Blue</span> (talk/contribs ↗) 13:13, 25 August 2024 (UTC)

File copyright problem with File:SuitRoyals.png

64px|left|alt=|link= ↗
Thank you for uploading :File:SuitRoyals.png ↗. However, it is currently missing information on its '''copyright''' and '''licensing''' status. Wikipedia takes copyright ↗ very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can verify that it has an acceptable license status and a verifiable source. Please add this information by editing the image description page ↗. You may refer to the '''image use policy ↗''' to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on '''copyright tags ↗''' may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion ↗ and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads ↗.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page ↗. Thanks again for your cooperation. 🔹<span style="color:#3457D5;">Blue</span> (talk/contribs ↗) 13:13, 25 August 2024 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 17

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Theophory in the Bible ↗, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Joel ↗ and Castiel ↗.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:59, 17 March 2025 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 28

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Triple Crossed (2013 film) ↗, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Matthew Campbell ↗.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:56, 28 April 2025 (UTC)

Maximillian Roeg ↗ moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Maximillian Roeg ↗. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because '''it has no sources'''.
I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page ↗.
When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. <span style="font-family: Garamond; font-size:1.2em"><span style="color: purple">''Sophisticatedevening''</span>🍷<sup><span style="color: purple">''(talk)''</span></sup></span> 05:38, 3 May 2025 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 5

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited I Want Your Love (film) ↗, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Keith McDonald ↗.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:57, 5 May 2025 (UTC)

Hasan Piker

30px|link= ↗ You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war ↗  according to the reverts you have made on :Hasan Piker ↗. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate ↗ with others, to avoid editing disruptively ↗, and to try to reach a consensus ↗, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:
# '''Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;'''
# '''Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.'''
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page ↗ to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard ↗ or seek dispute resolution ↗. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection ↗. If you engage in an edit war, you '''may be blocked ↗ from editing.'''  --Hipal (talk) 15:13, 19 May 2025 (UTC)
:Oh, I was simply adding back my information, but I removed sections that would come off as too flowery and overly detailed. I added his reason for his purchase of his home, and I added his purchase of a pet animal, which one can argue is the adoption of a new family member. '''''ThunderBrine''''' (talk; contributions ↗; watchlist ↗; sandbox) 17:43, 19 May 2025 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of :Template:Tem ↗

30px|link= ↗:Template:Tem ↗ has been nominated for deletion ↗. You are invited to comment on the discussion at '''the entry on the Templates for discussion page''' ↗. <span style="font-family:Times New Roman;color:#4B0082;">'''''DB'''''</span><span style="color:DeepSkyBlue"><small>'''''1729'''''</small></span><sup><span style="color:#4B0082;">'''''talk'''''</span></sup> 02:57, 27 May 2025 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 31

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of gemstones by species ↗, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Moonstone ↗.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:58, 31 May 2025 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of :Template:Talk Page Proposal ↗

30px|link= ↗:Template:Talk Page Proposal ↗ has been nominated for deletion ↗. You are invited to comment on the discussion at '''the entry on the Templates for discussion page''' ↗. – Jonesey95 (talk) 13:04, 1 June 2025 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of :Template:Talk Page Proposal check ↗

30px|link= ↗:Template:Talk Page Proposal check ↗ has been nominated for deletion ↗. You are invited to comment on the discussion at '''the entry on the Templates for discussion page''' ↗. – Jonesey95 (talk) 13:04, 1 June 2025 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of :Template:Talk Page Proposal outcome ↗

30px|link= ↗:Template:Talk Page Proposal outcome ↗ has been nominated for deletion ↗. You are invited to comment on the discussion at '''the entry on the Templates for discussion page''' ↗. <span style="display:inline-block;">House '''Blaster''' ↗ (talk • he/they)</span> 18:10, 19 June 2025 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of :Template:Talk Page Proposal Settled ↗

30px|link= ↗:Template:Talk Page Proposal Settled ↗ has been nominated for deletion ↗. You are invited to comment on the discussion at '''the entry on the Templates for discussion page''' ↗. <span style="display:inline-block;">House '''Blaster''' ↗ (talk • he/they)</span> 00:58, 29 June 2025 (UTC)

Speedy deletion ↗ nomination of :Category:Talk pages with settled proposals ↗

48px|left|alt=|link= ↗

A tag has been placed on :Category:Talk pages with settled proposals ↗ indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category ↗, a category redirect ↗, under discussion at Categories for discussion ↗, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion ↗.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may '''contest the nomination''' by visiting the page ↗ and removing the speedy deletion tag.   <span style="font-family:Papyrus; color:#800080;">'''''L'''''iz</span> <sup style="font-family: Times New Roman; color: #006400;">'''''Read!''''' ↗ '''''Talk!'''''</sup> 23:19, 6 July 2025 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 28

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Semitic people ↗, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sinai ↗.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:01, 28 August 2025 (UTC)

Your recent edits

Hi ThunderBrine, you may have seen that I have reverted several of your recent edits. The changes you are making have numerous issues, including:

Addition of unsourced and factually dubious information as you did at Venus flytrap ↗, Yaodong ↗, and Semitic people ↗

Unhelpful structural changes, such as at Bed size ↗ where you rearranged a simple table and made it virtually unreadable

Lack of edit summaries (of your last 50 edits, only one included an edit summary describing or explaining your change) - see WP:FIES ↗

Please ensure that your editing is constructive, and that information you add is supported ↗ by reliable sources ↗. YFB <span style="color:#33CC66;">¿</span> 10:28, 29 August 2025 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Maximillian Roeg ↗

25px|alt=Information icon ↗ Hello, ThunderBrine. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Maximillian Roeg ↗, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted ↗, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it ↗ again or request ↗ that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted ↗ so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 19:07, 3 October 2025 (UTC)

ArbCom 2025 Elections voter message

<div class="ivmbox " style="margin-bottom: 1em; border: 1px solid #a2a9b1; background-color: #fdf2d5; padding: 0.5em; display: flex; align-items: center; ">
<div class="ivmbox-image" style="padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em;flex-basis: 40px">40px ↗</div>
<div class="ivmbox-text">
Hello! Voting in the '''2025 Arbitration Committee elections ↗''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2025|end}}-1 day}}. All '''eligible users ↗''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee ↗ is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process ↗. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans ↗, topic bans ↗, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy ↗ describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please review the candidates ↗ and submit your choices on the '''2025|poll}}|voting page ↗'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. <small>MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:42, 18 November 2025 (UTC)</small>

</div>
</div>

January 2026

25px|alt=Information icon ↗ Hello, I'm Chiswick Chap. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, :Cattle ↗, but you didn't provide a reliable source ↗. On Wikipedia, it's important that article content be verifiable ↗. If you'd like to resubmit your change with a citation ↗, your edit is archived in the page history ↗. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you.  Chiswick Chap (talk) 13:00, 19 January 2026 (UTC)
:I didn't leave a source because the information that was changed was merely reorganized, and whatever was added—which I don't believe was much of anything—was simply taken from Wikipedia's other pages. '''''ThunderBrine''''' (talk; contributions ↗; watchlist ↗; sandbox) 20:25, 20 January 2026 (UTC)
::I see. Do note that Wikipedia is "not a reliable source", i.e. one page cannot rely on another, or there'd be an infinite regress of hunting for the magic source that might or might not exist at the end of the rainbow. The material that was there is basically unencyclopedic, i.e. it's about terminology and nomenclature rather than about the thing itself (cattle, animals, their biology and uses). Per WP:NOTDICT ↗, Wikipedia is "not a dictionary": the focus of any article is the thing named in the title, not words. We may sometimes need to use definitions or give etymologies, but our focus is never on nomenclature. Hope this is not too obvious to be worth stating! All the best, Chiswick Chap (talk) 09:46, 22 January 2026 (UTC)

25px|alt=Information icon ↗ Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at :Kiwifruit ↗. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism ↗ and have been reverted ↗. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges ↗. ''Don't see what kind of edit that was, but don't do it again.'' Zefr (talk) 21:17, 28 January 2026 (UTC)

:Firstly, the first part of my edit was addressing the translations of the text. The edit was undestructive, and it's arguable if it was unconstructive; It was simply a more thorough translation. The Chinese language, like the English language and many others, uses multiple symbols in a row to create compound words to describe a subject. What I did was not edit the material to imply falsehood, but instead, I was being pedantic while caring about the etymology of the translation, in an environment where pedancy is encouraged.
:Secondly, the second part of my edit was the bolding of the text. The edit was undestructive, and it's arguable if it was unconstructive; it was simply bolding the alternate names like with do at the top of the page in many other pages; we do this to bring attention to the subject among the rest of the text. '''''ThunderBrine''''' (talk; contributions ↗; watchlist ↗; sandbox) 22:28, 28 January 2026 (UTC)
::Thanks for the good explanations. I think your intent was in good faith. 1) The Chinese origin and etymology discussion seemed sufficient before your edits, and appears exaggerated even now for the English encyclopedia (WP:NOTEVERYTHING ↗), and 2) the excessive bolding of names, which are not at all common in 21st century English economics for kiwifruit or its uses, created a mess, MOS:NOBOLD ↗. Zefr (talk) 00:53, 29 January 2026 (UTC)

Your Greek mythology edits

Thanks for your interest in our Greek mythology articles. However, most of your edits involving Greek mythology have been reverted. Although all of the content you've tried to add might be useful, please note than all content needs appropriate sourcing. Please see: WP:VERIFY ↗. Thanks, Paul August ☎ ↗ 12:37, 13 April 2026 (UTC)

Your draft article, User:ThunderBrine/Maximillian Roeg

48px|left|alt=|link= ↗

Hello, ThunderBrine. This message concerns the Articles for Creation ↗ submission or draft ↗ page you started, "Maximillian Roeg".

Drafts that go unedited for six months are eligible for deletion, in accordance with our draftspace policy ↗, and this one has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply {{edit|User:ThunderBrine/Maximillian Roeg|edit the submission}}, and remove the {{tlc|db-afc}}, {{tlc|db-draft}}, or {{tlc|db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you read this, you can '''request its undeletion''' ↗. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the draft so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia!  DreamRimmer bot II (talk) 16:26, 15 April 2026 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Going Down in La-La Land novel.jpg

35px|text-top|left|⚠|link= ↗ Thanks for uploading ''':File:Going Down in La-La Land novel.jpg ↗'''. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use ↗. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media ↗).

Note that any non-free images not used in any '''articles''' will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion ↗. Thank you. Gert7 (talk · contribs ↗) 17:36, 25 May 2026 (UTC)

Going Down in La-La Land (novel) ↗ moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Going Down in La-La Land (novel) ↗. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing as a live article at this time because '''it has no sources'''.
I have converted it to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page ↗.
When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. PeriodicEditor (talk) 19:46, 25 May 2026 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 27

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Theophane ↗, links pointing to the disambiguation pages Ewe ↗ and Ram ↗ were added.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 21:53, 27 May 2026 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Going Down in La-La Land novel.jpg

Your submission at Articles for creation ↗: Going Down in La-La Land (novel) ↗ (May 29)

<div style="border: solid 1px #FCC; background-color: var(--background-color-warning-subtle, #fdf2d5); color: inherit; padding: 0.5em 1em; margin: 1.5em; width: 90%;">'''Draft declined'''{{pb}}50px|left ↗Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Your draft submission to Articles for creation ↗ has been reviewed but not accepted at this time.{{pb}}
<nowiki> </nowiki>'''Feedback'''{{pb}}The reviewer, Pencilceaser123, left the following feedback:
{{divbox|gray|3=This draft's references do not show that the book meets Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion for books ↗. The draft requires either:

evidence that the subject meets any of the ''specific criteria for books ↗''

'''or''' multiple published secondary ↗ sources that:

provide ''significant coverage ↗'': discuss the book in detail, not just brief mentions or routine announcements;

are ''reliable ↗'': from reputable outlets with editorial oversight;

are ''independent ↗'': not connected to the book, such as press releases, the author or publisher's own website, or sponsored content.

Please add references that meet these criteria. If none exist, the subject is not yet suitable for Wikipedia.|}}{{divbox|gray|3=This draft is not adequately supported by reliable sources ↗. Wikipedia's verifiability policy ↗ requires that all content be supported by reliable sources ↗.

Reliable sources include: reputable newspapers, magazines, academic journals, and books from respected publishers.

Unacceptable sources include: personal blogs, social media, predatory publishers ↗, most tabloids ↗, and websites where anyone can contribute.

Replace any unreliable sources with high-quality sources. If you cannot find a reliable source for the material, it should be removed.|}}

'''Next steps'''

Edit Draft:Going Down in La-La Land (novel) ↗ to address the points above, making sure to publish any changes.

When you are ready to resubmit your draft for review, click the '''Resubmit''' button.

If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it may be deleted ↗.

'''Need help?'''

For an overview of our policies and guidelines see Everything you need to know ↗.

You can ask for help at the <span class="plainlinks" >[//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/New_question&withJS=MediaWiki:AFCHD-wizard.js&page=Draft:Going_Down_in_La-La_Land_(novel) '''Articles for creation help desk''']</span>, or on the <span class="plainlinks" >[//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Pencilceaser123&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Going_Down_in_La-La_Land_(novel) '''reviewer's talk page''']</span>.

'''Scam warning'''

If anyone asks you for money or payment to publish, protect, or restore a Wikipedia article or draft, it is a scam. Learn about scams on Wikipedia ↗.

Pencilceaser123 (talk) 04:09, 29 May 2026 (UTC)</div>

{| style="margin: 0.4em 2em;"
|- style="vertical-align: top;"
| alt=Teahouse logo ↗
| <div style="background-color:#e1e6db; color: #393D38; padding: 1em; font-size: 1.1em; border-radius:10px;box-shadow:-2px -2px 1px #8e8a78;">Hello, '''ThunderBrine'''!
Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the '''Articles for creation help desk ↗'''. If you have any ''other'' questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the '''Teahouse ↗''', a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Pencilceaser123 (talk) 04:09, 29 May 2026 (UTC)</div>
|}
Category:Wikipedians who have received a Teahouse invitation through AfC ↗