User Talk: TitCrisse

Server-side rendered snapshot of this editor's Wikipedia talk page discussions.

{{Archives}}
{{User:MiszaBot/config
| algo = old(60d)
| archive = User talk:TitCrisse/Archive %(counter)d
| counter = 1
| maxarchivesize = 400K
| archiveheader = {{Archive}}
| minthreadstoarchive = 1
| minthreadsleft = 4
}}

Unblock request, not using AI

{{unblock reviewed|1=Good morning. Every word I’ve typed here is from my ten fingers. I apologize for using ChatGPT to refine my previous attempt. I did not know that the Wikipedia policy on using LLMs had changed in March of this year.

I humbly request to be unblocked please.

I cannot make this request from the Mamani1990 account as mentioned above on my talk page by Girth Summit, as it is globally locked and should remain that way. However, the reason Mamani1990 should remain locked is due to it being a sockpuppet of this account TitCrisse, not because it’s a sock of ConsumersDistributing.

The global lock on TitCrisse was lifted here: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Steward_requests/Global/2025-w43#h-Global_unlock_for_TitCrisse-Requests_for_global_(un)lock_and_(un)hiding-20251026100000 ↗, discussion here:https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Johannnes89/Archive/1#My_other_3_accounts ↗. I was never part of ConsumersDistributing. Mamani1990 is globally locked for the same reason, for an assumed connection to ConsumersDistributing.

I used Mamani1990 to evade the global lock on TitCrisse to make genuine edits on English wikipedia in good faith. I wanted to continue contributing constructively as a pastime. I should never have done this, I apologize. I should have requested the global unlock of TitCrisse the proper way from the get-go.
Also, while Mamani1990 was locked, I used a VPN and IP account to write an inappropriate comment (an African proverb) on a contributor’s talk page which could be interpreted as a threat: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Af%C3%AD-afeti&diff=prev&oldid=1318741159 ↗. I should have never done this and I apologize. It will never happen again.

When I reflect on my beginning, I realize I committed many mistakes, including the main one of creating several accounts without properly declaring them all. I assumed I could use different accounts to accomplish different tasks, but I never declared them all and it ended up just creating confusion and suspicion. I should have used just one account, this one (TitCrisse). I also lost my temper along the way and used AI to write without declaring it.

Since TitCrisse was unlocked on the French wiki 6 months ago, I’ve made over 4000 edits in good faith and am active on the Quebec project. I’ve been kind and helpful to other contributors and haven’t been blocked for any reason. I participated in a Wikimedia Canada event in Montreal in March. During this entire time, I’ve respected the decision of being blocked on English Wiki. I haven’t tried to evade, I haven’t contributed to the English Wikipedia at all. I haven’t created any other accounts or used a VPN to make contributions.

If I were unblocked on English Wiki, I promise to follow all the rules. To start, I will not use LLMs to write anything, full stop. I will contribute to the project using only this account. I will be kind and patient. I would like to translate articles from French into English, work on fighting vandalism, and contribute to the Canada project. I very much enjoy contributing to Wikipedia as a passtime and hope to have the ability to do so once again one day.
Thank you very much for taking the time to read this. Best regards, '''TitCrisse''' (t•c ↗) 11:39, 11 May 2026 (UTC).|accept=Welcome back. voorts (talk/contributions ↗) 18:22, 14 May 2026 (UTC)}} '''TitCrisse''' (t•c ↗) 11:39, 11 May 2026 (UTC)
:{{tlx|checkuser needed}} To check for socking / see the links to meta above which discuss things on CU wiki. voorts (talk/contributions ↗) 19:50, 11 May 2026 (UTC)
:: CheckUser didn't show any recent abuse of multiple accounts. PhilKnight (talk) 10:18, 12 May 2026 (UTC)
:@Girth Summit: any objections to unblocking? voorts (talk/contributions ↗) 00:35, 13 May 2026 (UTC)
::I have no objection to another chance in this instance. Girth Summit (blether) 16:26, 14 May 2026 (UTC)
:::Thank you @Voorts and @Girth Summit, I really appreciate being given this opportunity and I won't screw it up. Cheers, '''TitCrisse''' (t•c ↗) 19:18, 14 May 2026 (UTC).

Hello

Hello dear friend @TitCrisse, I noticed your contribution to Edward Sunday ↗, actually the goal is to build and not to uproot, I totally understand your concern, but that article is an article with significance, yeah you might not understand the source but let’s give it a chance as it was just undeleted (G13), it has never been on mainspace. if you understand the summary the admin who decline noted, you should understand that the article was nominated too soon, let’s hold a bit as see if more sources will be added, one things I’ll tell you multiple secondary sources always work, 1 source that isn’t good can’t rule out the others, at the point, I seak withdrawal of your Nom, thank you for your time. Allblessed (talk) 15:04, 16 May 2026 (UTC)

:Hello. I read all the sources. They are all either interviews or AI generated and very much appear like paid placements. I would rather let the community decided in the AfD whether the article should stay. Thank you, regards '''TitCrisse''' (t•c ↗) 20:58, 16 May 2026 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi TitCrisse. Thank you for your work on Jacques-Cartier Park (Sherbrooke) ↗. Another editor, Mariamnei, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol ↗ and left the following comment:

{{Bq|1=Thank you for your work on this article. Please add more sources and establish notability as per WP:NGEO ↗. Thanks and have a great day!}}

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{code|<nowiki>{{Re|</nowiki>Mariamnei<nowiki>}}</nowiki>}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation ↗ tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Mariamnei (talk) 12:30, 19 May 2026 (UTC)

:Good morning @Mariamnei, could you please explain why you believe this article doesn't pass WP:GNG ↗? 2 articles published 3 years apart on CBC (publicly-funded national TV/Radio/News in Canada) for a park established in 1989 satisfies the criteria in my opinion. Thank you, '''TitCrisse''' (t•c ↗) 12:38, 19 May 2026 (UTC).
::Thank you for writing to me. WP:GNG ↗ says that "Multiple publications from the same author or organization are usually regarded as a single source for the purposes of establishing notability." So the three sources from CBC count as one for notability purposes, and the other sources do not appear to be independent. I hope this helps clarify. Have a wonderful day! Mariamnei (talk) 09:32, 20 May 2026 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 28

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Place des Montréalaises ↗, a link pointing to the disambiguation page Radio-Canada ↗ was added. Such links are usually incorrect ↗, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ{{*}} Join us at the DPL WikiProject ↗.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 09:48, 28 May 2026 (UTC)

June 2026

25px|alt=icon ↗ I noticed that you tagged :Cambiaso Hermanos ↗ for speedy deletion ↗. I have removed the tag from the page because it does not meet the criterion or criteria specified. Please fully read Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion ↗ before tagging pages for speedy deletion. Thank you. ''Master wasn't blocked at time of creation.'' — rsjaffe 🗣️ 01:04, 7 June 2026 (UTC)

25px|alt=icon ↗ I noticed that you tagged :Technical School Network Roberto Rocca ↗ for speedy deletion ↗. I have removed the tag from the page because it does not meet the criterion or criteria specified. Please fully read Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion ↗ before tagging pages for speedy deletion. Thank you. ''Master not blocked at time of creation.'' — rsjaffe 🗣️ 01:12, 7 June 2026 (UTC)

25px|alt=icon ↗ I noticed that you tagged :Teesri Begum ↗ for speedy deletion ↗. I have removed the tag from the page because it does not meet the criterion or criteria specified. Please fully read Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion ↗ before tagging pages for speedy deletion. Thank you. ''Significant edits after sockpuppet creation.'' — rsjaffe 🗣️ 01:14, 7 June 2026 (UTC)

Classification in own articles

Hi {{ping|TitCrisse}} Can you stop setting the classification in your own articles. You set them all to "C" and they are not C class article. At best most of them are stubs and couple are start class. '''scope_creepTalk''' 12:09, 9 July 2026 (UTC)