W
Active Editors
Back to Profile

User Talk: Villaida

Server-side rendered snapshot of this editor's Wikipedia talk page discussions.

{{bots|deny=DPL bot}}

November 2023



25px|alt=Information icon ↗ Hello, I'm JohnLaurensAnthonyRamos333. I noticed that you recently made an edit to :126th Coastal Defence Brigade ↗&nbsp;in which your edit summary did not appear to describe the change you made. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary ↗. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page ↗. Thanks.<!-- Template:uw-mislead1 --> JohnLaurensAnthonyRamos333 (talk) 01:03, 30 November 2023 (UTC)

:Ok, good to know. I'll keep that in mind for future edits. Villaida (talk) 21:21, 30 November 2023 (UTC)

January 2024



25px|alt=Information icon ↗ Hi Villaida! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor that may not have been. "Minor edit ↗" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia—it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections ↗ or reverting obvious vandalism ↗. Any edit that changes the ''meaning'' of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Thank you. <!-- Template:uw-minor --> Kj cheetham (talk) 18:33, 16 January 2024 (UTC)

:Ah. Good to know.
:Thank you for telling me. Villaida (talk) 18:35, 16 January 2024 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 20



Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detectedthat when you recently edited University of Nîmes ↗, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Faculties ↗. Such links are usually incorrect ↗, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. <small>(Read the FAQ{{*}} Join us at the DPL WikiProject ↗.)</small>

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 05:53, 20 January 2024 (UTC)

CS1 error on Asylum case ↗


25px|alt=|link= ↗ Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have '''automatically detected''' that this edit ↗ performed by you, on the page :Asylum case ↗, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive ↗, you can [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:Qwerfjkl/Botpreload&editintro=User:Qwerfjkl/boteditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:Qwerfjkl&preloadtitle=Qwerfjkl%20(bot)%20–%20Villaida&section=new&preloadparams%5b%5d={{FULLPAGENAMEE:Asylum case}}&preloadparams%5b%5d=1197777918 report it to my operator].
Thanks, <!-- User:Qwerfjkl (bot)/inform -->Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 22:44, 21 January 2024 (UTC)

CS1 error on Australia women's national softball team ↗


25px|alt=|link= ↗ Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have '''automatically detected''' that this edit ↗ performed by you, on the page :Australia women's national softball team ↗, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive ↗, you can [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:Qwerfjkl/Botpreload&editintro=User:Qwerfjkl/boteditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:Qwerfjkl&preloadtitle=Qwerfjkl%20(bot)%20–%20Villaida&section=new&preloadparams%5b%5d={{FULLPAGENAMEE:Australia women's national softball team}}&preloadparams%5b%5d=1197781590 report it to my operator].
Thanks, <!-- User:Qwerfjkl (bot)/inform -->Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 23:04, 21 January 2024 (UTC)

CS1 error on George Ness Falkenstein ↗


25px|alt=|link= ↗ Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have '''automatically detected''' that this edit ↗ performed by you, on the page :George Ness Falkenstein ↗, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive ↗, you can [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:Qwerfjkl/Botpreload&editintro=User:Qwerfjkl/boteditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:Qwerfjkl&preloadtitle=Qwerfjkl%20(bot)%20–%20Villaida&section=new&preloadparams%5b%5d={{FULLPAGENAMEE:George Ness Falkenstein}}&preloadparams%5b%5d=1197784655 report it to my operator].
Thanks, <!-- User:Qwerfjkl (bot)/inform -->Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 23:20, 21 January 2024 (UTC)

CS1 error on West Town Mall ↗


25px|alt=|link= ↗ Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have '''automatically detected''' that this edit ↗ performed by you, on the page :West Town Mall ↗, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive ↗, you can [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:Qwerfjkl/Botpreload&editintro=User:Qwerfjkl/boteditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:Qwerfjkl&preloadtitle=Qwerfjkl%20(bot)%20–%20Villaida&section=new&preloadparams%5b%5d={{FULLPAGENAMEE:West Town Mall}}&preloadparams%5b%5d=1198356443 report it to my operator].
Thanks, <!-- User:Qwerfjkl (bot)/inform -->Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 22:50, 23 January 2024 (UTC)

Fellowship of Baptist Churches in South Africa ↗ moved to draftspace



Thanks for your contributions to Fellowship of Baptist Churches in South Africa ↗. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because '''it needs more sources to establish notability'''.
I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page ↗.
When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. ARandomName123 (talk)<sup><span style="color:Green"><small>Ping me!</small></span></sup> 22:03, 27 January 2024 (UTC)

:Ok. Thank you. Villaida (talk) 22:10, 27 January 2024 (UTC)

Hey



I noticed you edited some health-related articles recently; thanks for that. A bunch of us hang out at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine ↗. You're welcome to join us if that's an area of editing that interests you. It's a good place to ask questions about finding good sources for medical content ↗ or writing style ↗. Feel free to put the group's page on your watchlist ↗, or stop by to say hello some time. There are other groups for other subject areas. You can usually find them listed at the top of the talk page on your favorite articles. WhatamIdoing (talk) 18:21, 28 January 2024 (UTC)

Categories



Hi, try not to be too general when categorizing articles. For example, don’t put Football Club Les Aigles du Congo ↗ in :Category:Football ↗ and :Category:Kinshasa ↗ but :Category:Football clubs in Kinshasa ↗. Instead of using your best guess to categorize uncategorized articles, try to find similar related articles to see how they are categorized. Thanks. <span style="color:blue">Star</span><span style="color:orange">cheers</span><span style="color:green">peaks</span><span style="color:red">news</span>lost<span style="color:blue">wars</span><sup>Talk to me</sup> 08:33, 3 February 2024 (UTC)

:Ok.
:Thank you for telling me. Villaida (talk) 13:04, 3 February 2024 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!



{| style="background-color: #fdffe7; border: 1px solid #fceb92;"
|rowspan="2" style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 5px;" | 100px ↗
|style="font-size: x-large; padding: 3px 3px 0 3px; height: 1.5em;" | '''The Minor barnstar'''
|-
|style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;" | Congratulations! 14 novembre (talk) 20:38, 25 March 2024 (UTC)
|}

:Thank you?
:(I don't know how I got it but good for me!) Villaida (talk) 16:38, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
::@Villaida You got it thanks to your helpful contributions! Kind regards 14 novembre (talk) 🇮🇹 17:59, 29 March 2024 (UTC)

Uncategorized articles



Hi Villaida. I see that you're quite active at :Category:Uncategorized from March 2024‎‎ ↗ (and similar categories). Thanks for that: nobody could take on that task alone. That being said, I'm concerned by some of your categorizations. The first thing I've noticed, is that you often categorize articles using container categories ↗ or really high-level categories. This doesn't really solve the categorization problem, it just punts the problem to whoever cleans up the high-level categories. For instance, you recently categorized Budderside ↗ in :Category:Music ↗ and :Category:Hard rock ↗. Both are container categories so they shouldn't include individual articles besides the main articles such as music ↗, Index of music articles ↗ and hard rock ↗. I've re-categorized it in :Category:Hard rock musical groups from California ↗ and :Category:Musical groups from Los Angeles ↗. This is much more precise and thus more useful to the reader. (I wanted to add a category of the form :Category:Musical groups established in XXXX ↗ but there's conflicting information on the article so I left it out for now). My advice for this problem is to always check that the category you've just attributed to an article doesn't contain a more precise subcategory.
My second concern about your categorization work is somewhat unrelated. Once an article leaves the backlog of uncategorized articles, it's relatively rare that editors add categories since many are unfamiliar with the existing categories. So when we do categorize an article for the first time, we should make sure that it's categorized in as many relevant categories as possible. For instance, any biography should at the very least be in a year of birth cat, a year of death cat (or the living people cat), an occupation cat, a nationality cat but frequently, you can add things like alma mater cats, position cats (for sportspeople), teams played for cats (for sportspeople), instrument played (for musicians), year of establishment/disestablishments (for organizations) and so on. To figure this out, you can always look at the categories that have been assigned to similar articles. Also, it is sometimes hard to categorize an article because we're unfamiliar with the subject. My advice in this case is to let someone else handle that article. There are multiple people working on this backlog with different areas of competence. Someone will get to it eventually.
Sorry for the wall of text. I'm humble enough to avoid saying "follow my lead" but if you put :Category:Uncategorized from March 2024 ↗ (or any monthly category) you can see on your watchlist who is actively working on the backlog and you can check out their work (editors like Wikishovel, Lenticel, WereSpielChequers among many others). Cheers, Pichpich (talk) 20:45, 31 March 2024 (UTC)

:Thanks for clarifying-sometimes categorizing pages can get *slightly* confusing.
:The wall of text is okay- I think it might have helped me understand the entire categorizing process better. I'm willing to try to help out with possible repair for the possible annoyance I might have created for anybody else, or possibly not categorize for a while so I don't make it worse.
:I usually put year of birth/year of death, along with occupations and whatever year various companies were established as categories, and if I have absolutely no idea what an article is about I will feel more inclined to leave it alone. (Also I don't touch the templates because I don't understand how to categorize those which is probably wise.)
:Thank you again for the advice, and I will do my best to catch myself in the future so I don't end up doing it again. Villaida (talk) 21:42, 31 March 2024 (UTC)
::Well it certainly wasn't my intention to discourage you from working on that backlog. I just think there are simple ways of improving your categorization work and I hope you stick around with this advice in mind. Cheers, Pichpich (talk) 22:11, 1 April 2024 (UTC)

Mirrors


25px|alt=Information icon ↗ Thanks for contributing to the article Electrolyte ↗. However, one of Wikipedia's core policies is that material must be verifiable ↗ and attributed to reliable sources ↗. You have recently used citations which copied, or mirrored ↗, material from Wikipedia. This leads to a circular reference ↗ and is not acceptable. Most mirrors are clearly labeled as such, but some are in violation of our license and do not provide the correct attribution. Please help by adding alternate sources to the article you edited! If you need any help or clarification, you can look at Help:Contents/Editing Wikipedia ↗ or ask at Wikipedia:New contributors' help page ↗, or just ask me. Thank you.<!-- Template:uw-refimprove --> ''Sam '''Kuru''' (talk) ↗'' 11:13, 11 April 2024 (UTC) <br clear="both">

:Oops! I did not realize that I did that by mistake, so my bad. Thank you for telling me.
:I will do my best to fix the problem as soon as I get around to it. If it has not already happened, I'm considering replacing whichever source that was circular with the "citation needed" template, or reversing my edit so then it doesn't get in the way of others (and so that a person who finds a good source can stick it in). Then, I can try to find a different source that is not circular to replace it.
:Thank you again-- you and other Wikipedia editors are great at helping out and explaining all sorts of stuff.
:Enjoy your day or night (whichever qualifies). Villaida (talk) 15:38, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
::Again here ↗, the source clearly identifies itself as copies of Wikipedia articles. You even added "Wikipedia" as the author. ''Sam '''Kuru''' (talk) ↗'' 18:00, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
:::My apologies. Villaida (talk) 12:47, 3 May 2024 (UTC)

Tagging when there is a URL



Hello,

I just wanted to let you know that your recent edit here ↗ wasn't the best practice. Template:Unreferenced ↗ shouldn't be used if there is any URL at all on the page, including in the ==External links== section. We tend to think of sources as only the things that are formatted to look like little blue clicky numbers ({{dummy ref}}), but the goal for that template is to identify articles with absolutely ''nothing'' – no URLs, no list of books, absolutely no sources mentioned anywhere at all. This is because, especially for new contributors, people struggle to figure out the formatting, and what we need is something on the page. As the top of Wikipedia:Citing sources ↗ says, as long as they get something on the page, we can clean up the formatting later. {{tl|no footnotes}} is for URLs, and I like to add {{tl|third party}} when the URL is only to a website related to the subject. WhatamIdoing (talk) 17:25, 12 April 2024 (UTC)

:Ok. Good to know. Villaida (talk) 17:59, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
:Also is there a help page or whatnot that explains template usage? Villaida (talk) 18:28, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
::I doubt it. Usually, you want to look on each template's documentation page. WhatamIdoing (talk) 20:43, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
:::Ok. Thanks for the tip. Villaida (talk) 21:50, 12 April 2024 (UTC)

A Dobos torte ↗ for you!



{| style="background-color: #fdffe7; border: 1px solid #fceb92;"
|style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 5px;" | 120px ↗
|style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;" | <span style="text-shadow:#396 0.2em 0.2em 0.5em; class=texhtml"><b style="color:#060">7&amp;6=thirteen</b> (<b style="color:#000">☎</b>)</span> has given you a Dobos torte ↗ to enjoy! Seven layers of fun because you deserve it.



To give a Dobos torte and spread the WikiLove ↗, just place {{tls|Dobos Torte}} on someone else's talkpage, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend.
|} <span style="text-shadow:#396 0.2em 0.2em 0.5em; class=texhtml"><b style="color:#060">7&amp;6=thirteen</b> (<b style="color:#000">☎</b>)</span> 14:06, 21 April 2024 (UTC)

:Yum.
:Thanks!
:(happily consumes)
:That was good. Villaida (talk) 15:21, 21 April 2024 (UTC)

You Just Have Been Smiled Upon



<div style="border-style:solid; border-color:blue; background-color:AliceBlue; border-width:1px; text-align:left; padding:8px;" class="plainlinks">left|62px ↗ '''Hello Villaida''', CreatorOfMinecraftHerobrine has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove ↗ and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove ↗ by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Go on, smile! Cheers, and happy editing! <br /> <small>''Smile at others by adding {{tls|Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.''</small></div><!-- Template:Smile --> CreatorOfMinecraftHerobrine (talk) 13:14, 3 May 2024 (UTC)

:First I would like to say I wish I wrote this sooner.
:When you left this on my talk page, I was going through a really rough time and it made me feel so much better, and meant to reply right then, but found myself being decently busy. Villaida (talk) 23:43, 15 December 2024 (UTC)
::Hello there, I understand that you took your time to reply back since I've done something similar. Honestly, I didn't know that a kind little gesture of mine had a major impact on you during your rough time. I always try to make a positive impact on Wikipedia and its Users (though I can be a real pain sometimes) and I'm glad I succeeded here. :) Hacked (Talk|Contribs ↗) 04:48, 16 December 2024 (UTC)
::(BTW, I've changed my name from CreatorOfMinecraftHerobrine to Ivebeenhacked). Hacked (Talk|Contribs ↗) 04:49, 16 December 2024 (UTC)

Inappropriate references



I recently checked four of your edits that included the edit summary "‎sourced" or "sourced statements". All four edits were seriously problematic: either adding sources that have none of the hallmarks of reliability ↗, or adding references at the end of sentences that do not support the content of the sentence. Edits like this result in major decreases in the quality of Wikipedia. I see that just one month ago you were having other glaring problems with choosing appropriate sources. If you cannot determine if sources are of adequate quality or if they support the content to which they're attached, you should absolutely not be adding them anywhere -- this kind of subtle damage is very difficult for competent editors to fix. What process are you using to identify sources, and how many edits adding sources have you used following this process? --JBL (talk ↗) 18:49, 5 June 2024 (UTC)

:I apologize for causing frustration among other editors (and the late reply), and I realize that I likely did not put in as much effort as I should have to find reliable sources as I probably should have for these four edits. I am willing to not source articles, or to step back from doing edits if needed for a period of time if you feel like that would be a good idea.
:I normally try to google whatever I'm sourcing, but that works okay, but it does not work as well as I originally thought it would. I am not sure about the number - recently I've had a lot of stuff stored in my head, so it's been hard to keep track of everything.
:Again, I'm sorry, and I apologize for making a mistake that I should have been more aware about. Villaida (talk) 21:31, 7 June 2024 (UTC)

::Villaida, can I draw your attention to your edit to Mining ↗ which I have reverted. The source you added was problematic. First, that site clearly does not meet our requirements for reliability ↗ - it is not independent, but rather a commercial site so this is bordering on a spam link ↗. The text it contains is clearly a close paraphrase of the Mining ↗ article, so you are effectively trying to source the article to itself. Circular sourcing is not helpful. Please pay closer attention to the sources you use - as JayBeeEll says above "If you cannot determine if sources are of adequate quality or if they support the content to which they're attached, you should absolutely not be adding them anywhere -- this kind of subtle damage is very difficult for competent editors to fix". Thanks, Opolito (talk) 15:18, 23 March 2025 (UTC)
:::Ok. Villaida (talk) 16:40, 23 March 2025 (UTC)
:::Is there any way that I can avoid doing the same mistake again?
:::Thanks, Villaida (talk) 21:43, 23 March 2025 (UTC)
::::I recommend starting with Wikipedia:Reliable sources ↗, the primary guidelines on sourcing. The key sentence is from the overview: "Articles should be based on reliable, independent ↗, published sources with a reputation for fact-checking and accuracy." Opolito (talk) 22:16, 23 March 2025 (UTC)
:::::Ok. Thanks! Villaida (talk) 22:20, 23 March 2025 (UTC)

Tim Walz



I know nothing about Wikipedia other than I search a few things. Perhaps someone can make a correction. The bio page for Tim Walz shows he was he was a Command Sergeant Major. Walz failed to complete the U.S. Army Sergeants Major Academy. He quit before completion. He was only a Command Sergeant Major CONDITIONALLY and, only for a few months. He was bumped back down to Master Sergeant when he quit the reserves 2 years and 4+ months before his enlistment was up. There are plenty of ways for you to verify this but the easiest might be to search the Minnesota newspaper The West Central Tribune. On November 2, 2018 Command Sergeant Majors Thomas Behrends and Paul Herr authored "The Truth About Tim Walz." In fact, that should be listed in references. 50.53.93.249 ↗ (talk) 21:59, 6 August 2024 (UTC)

Proposed deletion ↗ of Longstone Primary School ↗



Hello, Villaida

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username DoubleGrazing, and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I've proposed ↗ an article that you started, Longstone Primary School ↗, for deletion because it meets one or more of our deletion criteria ↗, and I don't think that it is suitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. The particular issue can be found in the notice that is now visible at the top of the article ↗.

If you wish to contest the deletion:

# Primary School}}&action=edit Edit the page ↗
# Remove the text that looks like this: <code><nowiki>{{proposed deletion/dated...}}</nowiki></code>
# Click the {{Clickable button 2|Publish changes|color=blue|link=no}} button.

If you object to the article's deletion, please remember to '''explain''' why you think the article should be kept on the article's talk page ↗ and '''improve''' the page to address the issues raised in the deletion notice. Otherwise, it may be deleted later by other means ↗.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with <code><nowiki>{{Re|</nowiki>DoubleGrazing<nowiki>}}</nowiki></code>. And remember to sign your reply with <code><nowiki>~~~~</nowiki></code>. Thanks!

<small>(Message delivered via the Page Curation ↗ tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)</small><!-- Template:Proposed deletion notify-NPF -->

DoubleGrazing (talk) 10:22, 15 September 2024 (UTC)

:{{Re|DoubleGrazing}} I don't mind if it gets deleted (I don't think I created it in the first place), and it didn't seem like there was a lot of info about it on the internet anyways.
:Villaida (talk) 15:03, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
::Okay, thanks. The PROD will take a week (unless someone dePRODs it earlier), so maybe someone will find and add sources. If not, it'll probably turn into a redirect to the town's article. Best, -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 15:13, 15 September 2024 (UTC)

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message



<div class="ivmbox " style="margin-bottom: 1em; border: 1px solid #a2a9b1; background-color: #fdf2d5; padding: 0.5em; display: flex; align-items: center; ">
<div class="ivmbox-image noresize" style="padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em;">40px ↗</div>
<div class="ivmbox-text">
Hello! Voting in the '''2024 Arbitration Committee elections ↗''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2024|end}}-1 day}}. All '''eligible users ↗''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee ↗ is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process ↗. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans ↗, topic bans ↗, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy ↗ describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates ↗ and submit your choices on the '''2024|poll}}|voting page ↗'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. <small>MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:55, 19 November 2024 (UTC)</small>

</div>
</div>
<!-- Message sent by User:Cyberpower678@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2024/Coordination/MM/09&oldid=1258243804 -->

Non-mainspace categories



Please do not categorize WP:PROJCATS ↗ in the content space categories, as done here ↗ and here ↗. Best, CMD (talk) 03:43, 20 November 2024 (UTC)

:Ok. Noted. Villaida (talk) 23:12, 20 November 2024 (UTC)

Editor experience invitation



Hi Villaida. I'm looking for experienced editors to interview here. Feel free to pass if you're not interested. <span style="color:darkorchid">Clovermoss</span><span style="color:green">🍀</span> (talk) 16:48, 29 November 2024 (UTC)

2 spaces stub tags


Hi, I see you removed the 2 spaces before the stub tag at Anamarie Avila Farias ↗. Please don't do that. There are always two spaces before stub tags. Thanks! Masterhatch (talk) 23:12, 30 November 2024 (UTC)

:Ok. Good to know. Villaida (talk) 00:11, 1 December 2024 (UTC)

I see you did it at Alexander Filatov ↗ too. Can you go back through your edits and restore the spacing? Thanks! Masterhatch (talk) 23:15, 30 November 2024 (UTC)

Here's the "rule" about stub spacing: WP:STUBSPACING ↗. Masterhatch (talk) 23:19, 30 November 2024 (UTC)

John Becker (basketball)



Hi there! In your recent edit to the John Becker (basketball) ↗ article, you attempted to fix reference #4. However, the reference link doesn't work for me and you've introduced a new error. Could you please fix this reference to remove the red error? Thanks! GoingBatty (talk) 00:39, 24 December 2024 (UTC)

:Ok I'm going to try. (might take me a bit but I'm slowly figuring out how to fix it) Villaida (talk) 01:10, 24 December 2024 (UTC)
::Also, the specific page appears to no longer be found on the Burlington Free Press website, which seems like some info that you would find useful. Villaida (talk) 01:22, 24 December 2024 (UTC)
:::I have fixed the reference in a different way. If you find a different way to fix the reference, please do so. Happy editing! GoingBatty (talk) 03:10, 24 December 2024 (UTC)
::::Good fix- it looks pretty good to me so I'll leave it as is. Villaida (talk) 20:36, 24 December 2024 (UTC)

December 2024



25px|alt=Information icon ↗ Hello. I have noticed that you {{usertalk other|often ↗|often}} edit without using an edit summary ↗. Please do your best to '''always fill in the summary field'''. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. To help yourself remember, you may wish to check the "prompt me when entering a blank edit summary" box in your preferences ↗. Thanks! <!-- Template:Uw-editsummary2 --> GoingBatty (talk) 03:25, 24 December 2024 (UTC)

:Ok-good to know. Also thanks for the idea about the prompt- I'll definitely do that! Villaida (talk) 20:36, 24 December 2024 (UTC)
:I've turned the edit summary prompt part on now. Villaida (talk) 20:38, 24 December 2024 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!



{| style="background-color: var(--background-color-success-subtle, #fdffe7); border: 1px solid var(--border-color-success, #fceb92); color: var(--color-base, #202122);"
|rowspan="2" style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 5px;" | 100px ↗
|style="font-size: x-large; padding: 3px 3px 0 3px; height: 1.5em;" | '''The Editor's Barnstar'''
|-
|style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;" | Thank you for your recent work. Very appreciated. Mamani1990 (talk) 22:49, 11 January 2025 (UTC)
|}

:Thanks!
:(yippie!) Villaida (talk) 22:50, 11 January 2025 (UTC)

Spacing



Hi Villaida. Please do not change double spaces after periods to single spaces. It has no effect on the rendered page, and gets people upset for no benefit. --Trovatore (talk) 23:04, 25 January 2025 (UTC)

:Ok.
:Noted. Villaida (talk) 23:39, 25 January 2025 (UTC)

Copyright problem



Copyright problem: OVS (gang)


30px|link=|alt=Control copyright icon ↗ Hello Villaida! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as OVS (gang) ↗, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted material from other websites or printed works. This article appears to contain work copied from https://www.dailybulletin.com/2014/01/27/leaders-of-ontario-street-gang-convicted/, and therefore to constitute a violation of Wikipedia's copyright policies ↗. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted. While we appreciate your contributions, copying content from other websites is unlawful and against Wikipedia's copyright policy ↗. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators are likely to lose their editing privileges ↗.

If you believe that the article is ''not'' a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under license allowed by Wikipedia, then you should do one of the following:

It may also be necessary for the text to be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and to follow Wikipedia article layout ↗. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines ↗.

See Wikipedia:Declaration of consent for all enquiries ↗ for a template of the permissions letter the copyright holder is expected to send.

Otherwise, you may rewrite this article from scratch. If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at [{{fullurl:Talk:OVS (gang)/Temp|action=edit&preload=Template:Copyvio/preload}} this temporary page]. Leave a note at Talk:OVS (gang) ↗ saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved.

Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing!<!-- Template:Nothanks-web --><span id="Kolano123:1739050214464:User_talkFTTCLNVillaida" class="FTTCmt"> —&nbsp;<span style="color:blue;"> '''Kolano''' </span>•<span style="color:red;"> ''talk'' </span> 21:30, 8 February 2025 (UTC)</span>

:Is there anything specific that I should do about this? Villaida (talk) 15:27, 9 February 2025 (UTC)
:Also what should I do if I'm sure I didn't add it, but was fixing bare URLs, one of them being that one, and forgot to make sure that they weren't causing copyright problems? Villaida (talk) 15:34, 9 February 2025 (UTC)
:Ok, hopefully I'm not annoying you with all of these questions (what's annoying for me is that I've twice now thought of a question to ask after I've published a commet), but is there anywhere that I should look that would help me avoid repeating this? Thanks in advance! Villaida (talk) 18:42, 11 February 2025 (UTC)

Free play ↗ moved to draftspace



Thanks for your contributions to Free play ↗. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because '''it needs more sources to establish notability''', '''it consists of machine-generated text''' and '''clearly NOT ready for main space'''.
I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page ↗.
When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Theroadislong (talk) 18:43, 28 March 2025 (UTC)

Bad citation dates



Hello, your edit to Hardy ministry ↗ (https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Hardy_ministry&diff=prev&oldid=1263262403) contained a bunch of incorrect publication dates. Please clean it up. Legend of 14 (talk) 20:14, 17 May 2025 (UTC)

:Ok. Will do. Villaida (talk) 13:39, 18 May 2025 (UTC)

Bicol express ↗



Thank you, ''thank you!'' for jumping into this article to deal with the overlinking after I had to take a break from it ↗! You're a boon to the encyclopedia! Much appreciated - <span style="color:#006600;font-family:Futura">Julietdeltalima</span> ''<span style="color:#806000">(talk)</span>'' 21:35, 9 November 2025 (UTC)

:You're welcome! I'm glad I could help. Villaida (talk) 21:36, 9 November 2025 (UTC)

ArbCom 2025 Elections voter message



<div class="ivmbox " style="margin-bottom: 1em; border: 1px solid #a2a9b1; background-color: #fdf2d5; padding: 0.5em; display: flex; align-items: center; ">
<div class="ivmbox-image" style="padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em;flex-basis: 40px">40px ↗</div>
<div class="ivmbox-text">
Hello! Voting in the '''2025 Arbitration Committee elections ↗''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2025|end}}-1 day}}. All '''eligible users ↗''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee ↗ is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process ↗. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans ↗, topic bans ↗, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy ↗ describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please review the candidates ↗ and submit your choices on the '''2025|poll}}|voting page ↗'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. <small>MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:59, 18 November 2025 (UTC)</small>

</div>
</div>
<!-- Message sent by User:Cyberpower678@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2025/Coordination/MM/08&oldid=1322758940 -->

Great Mall of the Bay Area edit



I had noticed that you had removed the stub notice. I had reverted it due to there not being enough evidence and information about the property. Not a huge deal however, we all make mistakes. Just letting you know that I will remove that stub notice once we (as in the Wikipedia editors) expand onto the article. Thanks!


-Editor22968

(I can make mistakes as well, so please let me know if what I did may be wrong. I can make mistakes due to me being a newer editor and how my brain functions) Editor22968 (talk) 22:57, 26 April 2026 (UTC)

:Sounds good! Villaida (talk) 17:41, 16 May 2026 (UTC)

Bare URLs



Hello. You have tagged several articles with the bare URLs banner which do not contain bare URLs. A bare URL is ''only'' a URL, with no other identifying information at all. See WP:BAREURLS ↗ for more information. Thank you, MediaKyle (talk) 17:06, 16 May 2026 (UTC)

:Ah, ok good to know. Thank you for the information. Villaida (talk) 17:41, 16 May 2026 (UTC)