W
Active Editors
Back to Profile

User Talk: Xose.vazquez

Server-side rendered snapshot of this editor's Wikipedia talk page discussions.

March 2018


25px|alt=Information icon ↗ Constructive contributions to Wikipedia ↗ are appreciated, but a recent edit ↗ of yours to the page :NUMAlink ↗ has an edit summary ↗ that appears to be inaccurate or inappropriate. The summaries are helpful to people browsing an article's history ↗, so it is important that you use edit summaries that accurately tell other editors what you did. Feel free to use the sandbox ↗ to make test edits. Thank you.<!-- Template:uw-wrongsummary --> TJRC (talk) 00:28, 24 March 2018 (UTC)

Proposed deletion ↗ of :Vostok Europe ↗


left|link=|alt=Notice|48px| ↗

The article :Vostok Europe ↗ has been proposed for deletion ↗&#32;because of the following concern:
<blockquote>Not notable watch manufacturer, fails WP:NCORP ↗</blockquote>

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons ↗.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary ↗ or on the article's talk page ↗.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process ↗, but other deletion process ↗es exist. In particular, the speedy deletion ↗ process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion ↗ allows discussion to reach consensus ↗ for deletion.<!-- Template:Proposed deletion notify --> Renata (talk) 00:52, 1 August 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 17



Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of mechanical keyboards ↗, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Corsair ↗ ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/List_of_mechanical_keyboards check to confirm]&nbsp;|&nbsp;[//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/List_of_mechanical_keyboards?client=notify fix with Dab solver]). Such links are usually incorrect ↗, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. <small>(Read the FAQ{{*}} Join us at the DPL WikiProject ↗.)</small>

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:24, 17 October 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message



{{Ivmbox|Hello, Xose.vazquez. Voting in the '''2018 Arbitration Committee elections ↗''' is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee ↗ is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process ↗. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans ↗, topic bans ↗, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy ↗ describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates ↗ and submit your choices on the '''voting page ↗'''. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
|Scale of justice 2.svg|imagesize=40px}}
<!-- Message sent by User:Cyberpower678@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2018/Coordination/MMS/12&oldid=866998410 -->

Proposed deletion ↗ of :List of Tomtom products ↗


left|link=|alt=Notice|48px| ↗

The article :List of Tomtom products ↗ has been proposed for deletion ↗&#32;because of the following concern:
<blockquote>Wikipedia is WP:NOT ↗ a product directory; appears unsourced and none of these products appear independently notable.</blockquote>

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons ↗.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary ↗ or on the article's talk page ↗.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process ↗, but other deletion process ↗es exist. In particular, the speedy deletion ↗ process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion ↗ allows discussion to reach consensus ↗ for deletion.<!-- Template:Proposed deletion notify --> power~enwiki (<span style="color:#FA0;font-family:courier">π</span>, <span style="font-family:courier">ν</span> ↗) 23:09, 24 January 2019 (UTC)

Linking of Redhat OpenJDK to Adopt



The sense I get from Redhat's available downloads and migration guides is that they intend to support and develop RedHat OpenJDK on the server side. The windows clients they have available for download are restricted to "Development only" and intended for developers to use for writing against RHEL middleware (seemingly only provided to validate client and server differences from the Oracle OpenJDK implementation). That would indicate that intend to leave the client space to the Adopt OpenJDK project (which AdoptOpenJDK claims they sponsor and host). Thus, I would expect the linking to be as follows:
RedHat OpenJDK for Linux -> RHEL Repository downloads
RedHat OpenJDK for Windows -> https://developers.redhat.com/products/openjdk/download (for development only)
AdoptOpenJDK -> https://adoptopenjdk.net/

But the RedHat OpenJDK is not the same as the AdoptOpenJDK implementation - so the link from the RedHat OpenJDK for windows to AdoptOpenJDK seems incorrect. <!-- Template:Unsigned --><small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding unsigned ↗ comment added by Jeremyh3 (talk • contribs ↗) 21:58, 8 November 2019 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

ArbCom 2019 election voter message



<table class="messagebox " style="border: 1px solid #AAA; background: ivory; padding: 0.5em; width: 100%;">
<tr><td style="vertical-align:middle; padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em;">40px ↗</td><td>Hello! Voting in the '''2019 Arbitration Committee elections ↗''' is now open until 23:59 on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2019|end}}-1 day}}. All '''eligible users ↗''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee ↗ is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process ↗. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans ↗, topic bans ↗, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy ↗ describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates ↗ and submit your choices on the '''2019|poll}}|voting page ↗'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:07, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
</td></tr>
</table>
<!-- Message sent by User:Cyberpower678@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2019/Coordination/MMS/02&oldid=926750292 -->

February 2020


25px|alt=Information icon|link= ↗ Hello. Thank you for your contributions ↗ to Wikipedia ↗.

{{The edit-summary field}}

I noticed your recent edit to :BS2000 ↗ does not have an edit summary ↗.&#32;Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries ↗ are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:
{{Div col|colwidth=20em}}
{{Div col end}}
Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. With a Wikipedia account ↗ you can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting {{myprefs|3|check=Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary}}.
Thanks!<!-- Template:uw-editsummary --> Oneiros (talk) 17:33, 15 February 2020 (UTC)

References vs articles to support a claim



You've been around a long time, so I thought I'd drop you a line to explain why I reverted one of your edits to Dive computer ↗. The ''Manufacturers'' section has a maintenance template requesting more citations, so it's probably not a good idea to remove one of them. I do understand that most of the time, when we mention a company, we don't externally link to their website, and simply link to their article when it exists. However, that is to allow a reader to find out more about the company if they wish. That's a different concept from supplying a reference to support a claim. In the case where I reverted you, the reference was supporting the claim that HeinrichsWeikamp ↗ manufactures dive computers. Their own webpage is not an ideal source, of course, but generally we accept information that companies provide ''about themselves'', as long as it's not unduly promotional or self-serving. The conditions for using a self-published source are laid out at WP:ABOUTSELF ↗. Hope that helps. --RexxS (talk) 23:57, 15 February 2020 (UTC)

Comparison of TFTP software ↗ moved to draftspace



An article you recently created, Comparison of TFTP software ↗, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable ↗, independent sources ↗. <small>(? ↗)</small> Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability ↗ is of central importance ↗ on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace ↗ (with a prefix of "<code>Draft:</code>" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline ↗ and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Celestina007 (talk) 23:54, 22 May 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation ↗: Comparison of TFTP software ↗ (August 8)


<div style="border: solid 1px #FCC; background-color: #F8EEBC; padding: 0.5em 1em; color: #000; margin: 1.5em; width: 90%;"> 50px|left ↗Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation ↗ has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time.<nowiki> </nowiki>The reason left by Jackmcbarn was:

{{divbox|gray|3=Articles need to have some prose in them. Consider putting this in Trivial File Transfer Protocol ↗ instead of trying to make it its own article.|}}<!--
--
--> Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit ''when they have been resolved''.
{{clear}}

Jackmcbarn (talk) 20:24, 8 August 2020 (UTC)</div><!--Template:Afc decline-->

{| style="margin: 0.4em 2em;"
|- style="vertical-align: top;"
| alt=Teahouse logo ↗
| <div style="background-color:#e1e6db; color: #393D38; padding: 1em; font-size: 1.1em; border-radius:10px;box-shadow:-2px -2px 1px #8e8a78;">Hello, '''Xose.vazquez'''!
Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the '''Articles for creation help desk ↗'''. If you have any ''other'' questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the '''Teahouse ↗''', a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Jackmcbarn (talk) 20:24, 8 August 2020 (UTC)</div>
|}<!-- Wikipedia:Teahouse/AfC Invitation -->
Category:Wikipedians who have received a Teahouse invitation through AfC ↗

PROD



Hey, I just wanted to say that I deprodded Draft:Comparison of TFTP software ↗ because proposed deletion is only for articles and files. If you want your draft to be deleted, just use <code><nowiki>{{</nowiki>db-g7 ↗<nowiki>}}</nowiki></code> and it’ll be deleted. Thanks! Maka (talk '''·''' contribs ↗) 01:23, 30 September 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message



<table class="messagebox " style="border: 1px solid #AAA; background: ivory; padding: 0.5em; width: 100%;">
<tr><td style="vertical-align:middle; padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em;">40px ↗</td><td>Hello! Voting in the '''2020 Arbitration Committee elections ↗''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2020|end}}-1 day}}. All '''eligible users ↗''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee ↗ is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process ↗. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans ↗, topic bans ↗, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy ↗ describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates ↗ and submit your choices on the '''2020|poll}}|voting page ↗'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:31, 24 November 2020 (UTC)
</td></tr>
</table>
<!-- Message sent by User:Xaosflux@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2020/Coordination/MMS/02&oldid=990308077 -->

Vendor links


:{{spamlink|t-head.cn}}
25px|alt=Information icon ↗ Hello, I'm Ohnoitsjamie. I wanted to let you know that one or more external links you added have been removed because they seemed to be inappropriate for an encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page ↗, or take a look at our guidelines ↗ about links. Thank you. {{PAGENAME}} ↗<!-- Template:uw-spam1 --> <b>OhNo<span style="color: #D47C14;">itsJamie</span> <sup>Talk</sup></b> 22:56, 28 February 2021 (UTC)

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion


link=|25px|alt=Information icon ↗
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring ↗ regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring ↗. <!--Template:An3-notice--> Thank you.

30px|left|alt=Stop icon ↗ Your recent editing history at :CentOS ↗ shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war ↗; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page ↗ to work toward making a version that represents consensus ↗ among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle ↗ for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard ↗ or seek dispute resolution ↗. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection ↗.

'''Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing ↗'''&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule ↗, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts ↗ on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;'''even if you do not violate the three-revert rule'''&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.<!-- Template:uw-3rr -->

Carlwgeorge (talk) 04:31, 6 March 2021 (UTC)

Edit warring complaint



Please see the result of a recent complaint about you ↗ at the edit warring noticeboard. My only action is to remind you to observe Wikipedia's guideline at WP:TALK ↗ which describes the correct usage of talk pages:
#New posts are supposed to go at the *bottom*, so I had to undo your rearrangement.
#There is no justification for removing others' posts unless they are vandalism.
#Also, please be sure to WP:SIGN ↗ your own posts on talk.
Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 21:01, 14 March 2021 (UTC)

March 2021



30px|link=|alt=Copyright problem icon ↗ Your edit to :Sendmail ↗ has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted ↗ material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission ↗ from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials ↗ for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of ''information'', but not as a source of ''content'', such as sentences or images&mdash;you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy '''will be blocked from editing ↗'''. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources ↗ for more information. <!-- Template:uw-copyright --> — Diannaa&nbsp;(talk) 22:22, 24 March 2021 (UTC)

:Why are you removing a full section? Do you understand what you are doing? They are many similar texts in the wiki, for example: BSD licenses ↗ — Xose.vazquez&nbsp;(talk) 23:34, 24 March 2021 (UTC)

May 2021


25px|alt=Information icon ↗ Hello, I'm DaxServer. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions ↗&nbsp;to :IBM Global Services ↗ have been undone because they appeared to be promotional. Advertising ↗ and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox ↗" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted; Wikipedia articles should be written objectively, using independent sources, and from a neutral perspective ↗. Take a look at the welcome page ↗ to learn more about Wikipedia. '' ''{{PAGENAME}} ↗<!-- Template:uw-advert1 --> -- DaxServer (talk) 17:54, 20 May 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message



<table class="messagebox " style="border: 1px solid #AAA; background: ivory; padding: 0.5em; width: 100%;">
<tr><td style="vertical-align:middle; padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em;">40px ↗</td><td>Hello! Voting in the '''2021 Arbitration Committee elections ↗''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2021|end}}-1 day}}. All '''eligible users ↗''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee ↗ is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process ↗. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans ↗, topic bans ↗, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy ↗ describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates ↗ and submit your choices on the '''2021|poll}}|voting page ↗'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. <small>MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:12, 23 November 2021 (UTC)</small>
</td></tr>
</table>
<!-- Message sent by User:Cyberpower678@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2021/Coordination/MM/02&oldid=1056563129 -->

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message



<div class="ivmbox " style="margin-bottom: 1em; border: 1px solid #AAA; background-color: ivory; padding: 0.5em; display: flex; align-items: center; ">
<div class="ivmbox-image" style="padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em; flex: 1 0 40px;">40px ↗</div>
<div class="ivmbox-text">
Hello! Voting in the '''2022 Arbitration Committee elections ↗''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2022|end}}-1 day}}. All '''eligible users ↗''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee ↗ is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process ↗. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans ↗, topic bans ↗, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy ↗ describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates ↗ and submit your choices on the '''2022|poll}}|voting page ↗'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. <small>MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:33, 29 November 2022 (UTC)</small>

</div>
</div>
<!-- Message sent by User:Cyberpower678@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2022/Coordination/MM/02&oldid=1124425183 -->

Nomination for deletion of :Template:Releases Red Hat Linux ↗


30px|link= ↗:Template:Releases Red Hat Linux ↗ has been nominated for deletion ↗. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page ↗.<!--Template:Tfdnotice--> – Jonesey95 (talk) 03:12, 7 January 2023 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of :Template:X86-ABI ↗


30px|link= ↗:Template:X86-ABI ↗ has been nominated for deletion ↗. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page ↗.<!--Template:Tfdnotice--> – Jonesey95 (talk) 22:39, 7 January 2023 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of :Template:Releases openSUSE ↗


30px|link= ↗:Template:Releases openSUSE ↗ has been nominated for deletion ↗. You are invited to comment on the discussion at '''the entry on the Templates for discussion page''' ↗.<!--Template:Tfdnotice--> – Jonesey95 (talk) 20:16, 25 May 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message



<div class="ivmbox " style="margin-bottom: 1em; border: 1px solid #AAA; background-color: ivory; padding: 0.5em; display: flex; align-items: center; ">
<div class="ivmbox-image" style="padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em; flex: 1 0 40px; max-width: 100px">40px ↗</div>
<div class="ivmbox-text">
Hello! Voting in the '''2023 Arbitration Committee elections ↗''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2023|end}}-1 day}}. All '''eligible users ↗''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee ↗ is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process ↗. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans ↗, topic bans ↗, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy ↗ describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates ↗ and submit your choices on the '''2023|poll}}|voting page ↗'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. <small>MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:28, 28 November 2023 (UTC)</small>

</div>
</div>
<!-- Message sent by User:Cyberpower678@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2023/Coordination/MM/02&oldid=1187132049 -->

Mlmmj ↗ moved to draftspace



Thanks for your contributions to Mlmmj ↗. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because '''it needs more sources to establish notability'''.
I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page ↗.
When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. '''<span style="color:#1d556d">Just</span>''''''<span style="color:#000000">i</span>''' ↗'''<span style="color:#6d351d">yaya</span>''' 11:49, 16 January 2024 (UTC)

:I don't see how the subject is notable. If you think I'm wrong, please ping me. '''<span style="color:#1d556d">Just</span>''''''<span style="color:#000000">i</span>''' ↗'''<span style="color:#6d351d">yaya</span>''' 11:51, 16 January 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation ↗: Mlmmj ↗ (March 10)


<div style="border: solid 1px #FCC; background-color: #F8EEBC; padding: 0.5em 1em; color: #000; margin: 1.5em; width: 90%;"> 50px|left ↗Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation ↗ has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time.<nowiki> </nowiki>The reason left by Funnyfarmofdoom was:

{{divbox|gray|3=This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article ↗—that is, they do not show ''significant'' coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in ''published'', ''reliable'' ↗, ''secondary'' ↗ sources that are ''independent ↗'' of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of websites ↗). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help ↗ and learn about mistakes to avoid ↗ when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.|}}<!--
--
--> Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit ''after they have been resolved''.
{{clear}}

Funnyfarmofdoom (talk to me) 15:22, 10 March 2024 (UTC)</div><!--Template:AfC decline-->

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message



<div class="ivmbox " style="margin-bottom: 1em; border: 1px solid #a2a9b1; background-color: #fdf2d5; padding: 0.5em; display: flex; align-items: center; ">
<div class="ivmbox-image noresize" style="padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em;">40px ↗</div>
<div class="ivmbox-text">
Hello! Voting in the '''2024 Arbitration Committee elections ↗''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2024|end}}-1 day}}. All '''eligible users ↗''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee ↗ is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process ↗. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans ↗, topic bans ↗, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy ↗ describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates ↗ and submit your choices on the '''2024|poll}}|voting page ↗'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. <small>MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:11, 19 November 2024 (UTC)</small>

</div>
</div>
<!-- Message sent by User:Cyberpower678@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2024/Coordination/MM/01&oldid=1258243333 -->

Concern regarding Draft:Mlmmj ↗


25px|alt=Information icon ↗ Hello, Xose.vazquez. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Mlmmj ↗, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted ↗, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it ↗ again&#32;or request ↗ that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted ↗ so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 11:06, 17 December 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation ↗: Mlmmj ↗ (February 11)


<div style="border: solid 1px #FCC; background-color: #F8EEBC; padding: 0.5em 1em; color: #000; margin: 1.5em; width: 90%;"> 50px|left ↗Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation ↗ has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time.<nowiki> </nowiki>The reason left by KylieTastic was:

{{divbox|gray|3=This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article ↗. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are: <br />
Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid ↗ when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.|}}<!--
--
--> Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit ''after they have been resolved''.
{{clear}}

KylieTastic (talk) 19:56, 11 February 2025 (UTC)</div><!--Template:AfC decline-->

Nomination of :History of Ruby ↗ for deletion


<div class="afd-notice">
<div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0;">48px|alt=|link= ↗</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article :History of Ruby ↗ is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines ↗ or whether it should be deleted ↗.

The article will be discussed at '''Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/History of Ruby ↗''' until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.<!-- Template:Afd notice --></div> Gracen (they/them ↗) 21:10, 21 March 2025 (UTC)

July 2025



25px|alt=Information icon ↗ Thank you for your contributions ↗ to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved content from :Zen (microarchitecture) ↗ into another page. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content (here or elsewhere), Wikipedia's licensing ↗ does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary ↗ at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking ↗ to the copied page, e.g., <code>copied content from <nowiki>page name ↗</nowiki>; see that page's history for attribution</code>. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{tl|copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia ↗. Thank you. <!-- Template:uw-copying --> <span style="white-space: nowrap;">—Compassionate727&nbsp;<sup>(T·C ↗)</sup></span> 13:24, 19 July 2025 (UTC)

August 2025



25px|alt=Information icon ↗ Hello. I have noticed that you {{usertalk other|often ↗|often}} edit without using an edit summary ↗. Please do your best to '''always fill in the summary field'''. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. To help yourself remember, you may wish to check the "prompt me when entering a blank edit summary" box in your preferences ↗. Thanks! <!-- Template:Uw-editsummary2 --> — <kbd><span style="color: blue">void</span><span style="color: black">xor</span></kbd> 19:56, 3 August 2025 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Mlmmj ↗


48px|left|alt=|link= ↗
Hello, Xose.vazquez. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation ↗ submission or draft ↗ page you started, "Mlmmj ↗".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion ↗. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. <!-- Template:Db-draft-deleted --><!-- Template:Db-csd-deleted-custom --> <span style="font-family:Papyrus; color:#800080;">'''''L'''''iz</span> <sup style="font-family: Times New Roman; color: #006400;">'''''Read!''''' ↗ '''''Talk!'''''</sup> 19:55, 11 August 2025 (UTC)

Nomination for discussion of :Template:Releases SLES ↗


30px|link= ↗:Template:Releases SLES ↗ has been nominated for discussion ↗. You are invited to comment on the discussion at '''the entry on the Templates for discussion page''' ↗.<!--Template:Tfdnotice--> – Jonesey95 (talk) 14:19, 19 August 2025 (UTC)

September 2025



25px|alt=Information icon ↗ Hello, I'm Zackmann08. Thank you for your recent contributions&nbsp;to :Minix 3 ↗. When you were adding content to the page, you added duplicate arguments ↗ to a template which can cause issues with how the template is rendered. In the future, please use the preview ↗ button before you save your edit; this helps you find these errors as they will display in yellow at the top of the page. Thanks.<!---Template:Uw-dupargs---> '''<span style="color:#00ced1">Zack</span><span style="color:#007F94">mann</span>''' (<sup>Talk to me ↗</sup>/<sub><span style="color:orange;">What I been doing</span> ↗</sub>) 08:41, 17 September 2025 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 29



Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ethernet over twisted pair ↗, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Cat 3 ↗. Such links are usually incorrect ↗, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. <small>(Read the FAQ{{*}} Join us at the DPL WikiProject ↗.)</small>

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 07:57, 29 October 2025 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 5



An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Microprocessor chronology ↗, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Arrow Lake ↗.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 20:01, 5 November 2025 (UTC)

ArbCom 2025 Elections voter message



<div class="ivmbox " style="margin-bottom: 1em; border: 1px solid #a2a9b1; background-color: #fdf2d5; padding: 0.5em; display: flex; align-items: center; ">
<div class="ivmbox-image" style="padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em;flex-basis: 40px">40px ↗</div>
<div class="ivmbox-text">
Hello! Voting in the '''2025 Arbitration Committee elections ↗''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2025|end}}-1 day}}. All '''eligible users ↗''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee ↗ is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process ↗. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans ↗, topic bans ↗, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy ↗ describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please review the candidates ↗ and submit your choices on the '''2025|poll}}|voting page ↗'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. <small>MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:22, 18 November 2025 (UTC)</small>

</div>
</div>
<!-- Message sent by User:Cyberpower678@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2025/Coordination/MM/01&oldid=1322757968 -->

External links


Hi there. I noticed that you deleted the official external link from the FreeBSD ↗ article because it is already contained in a template (I assume the infobox, as I cannot find it elsewhere). Note that the infobox should summarize what is in the text, not contrain additional info (despite the fact that many do so anyway). Third parties that take WP data may exclude infoboxes, navboxes, etc. from the articles, so data such as the official website link should remain in the text (in the External links section) to ensure it is still accessible for readers of those third-party documents. <span style="color: #8b4513;">Mind</span><span style="color: #ee8811;">matrix</span> ↗ 01:22, 9 July 2026 (UTC)