User Talk: ZlatanSweden10

Server-side rendered snapshot of this editor's Wikipedia talk page discussions.

Centrists (Liberal Party of Australia) ↗ moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Centrists (Liberal Party of Australia) ↗. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because '''it has no sources'''.
I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page ↗.
When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Significa liberdade <small>(she/her)</small> (talk) 22:17, 24 September 2024 (UTC)

:Got it. I'll let you know when I find some sources then you can publish it as I don't know how to publish a page. ZlatanSweden10 (talk) 22:22, 24 September 2024 (UTC)

Deutschlandtakt ↗ moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Deutschlandtakt ↗. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because '''it needs more sources to establish notability''' and '''it is a poor translation'''.
I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page ↗.
When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Trainsandotherthings (talk) 23:58, 17 October 2024 (UTC)

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

<div class="ivmbox " style="margin-bottom: 1em; border: 1px solid #a2a9b1; background-color: #fdf2d5; padding: 0.5em; display: flex; align-items: center; ">
<div class="ivmbox-image noresize" style="padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em;">40px ↗</div>
<div class="ivmbox-text">
Hello! Voting in the '''2024 Arbitration Committee elections ↗''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2024|end}}-1 day}}. All '''eligible users ↗''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee ↗ is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process ↗. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans ↗, topic bans ↗, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy ↗ describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates ↗ and submit your choices on the '''2024|poll}}|voting page ↗'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. <small>MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:43, 19 November 2024 (UTC)</small>

</div>
</div>

Colors for the conference labels in the "Teams" table

@ZlatanSweden10, regarding the discussion about the background colors for the conference labels in the "Teams" tables, I'm not in favor of dropping them altogether, as I believe color coding makes the tables easier to understand. You had suggested adding a small color strip. Instead of a strip, would it be possible to add a border around each conference/division to match the color coding of the map? For example, MLS has two conferences (no divisions), so only pink and light blue would be used. NHL has four divisions (shown in yellow, pink, purple, and green on the map), MLB has six, NFL has eight, and so on. That way, there would be a visual correlation between the table and the map. This can be done in the sandbox for each league and then ask for consensus before implementing permanently. Assadzadeh (talk) 21:23, 5 December 2024 (UTC)

:I agree! I think the colour strip is the best way to go. As to how to add them I think I know how to as I've done it for political party page tables in the past (such as for here: Multi-Party Charter#Main parties ↗). But I think it is a slightly different process. Regardless I think getting some more opinions (who should agree with us) would be a good thing (I'm willing to bet there are pros who know how to edit tables better than me). ZlatanSweden10 (talk) 22:41, 5 December 2024 (UTC)
::I think you've done a great job with the political parties pages. It's similar to List of presidents of the United States ↗.
::Do you know of a general group covering all the major sports leagues that this question can be posted to? In the meantime, I would suggest removing the background colors per MOS:COLORCODING ↗ as they are too glaring and don't necessarily match the maps. Would you have an issue with this? Assadzadeh (talk) 03:29, 7 December 2024 (UTC)

Deutschlandtakt ↗ moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Deutschlandtakt ↗. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because '''it was published by likely sockpuppet'''.
I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page ↗.
When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit for review" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. DoubleGrazing (talk) 09:59, 9 January 2025 (UTC)

A cup of tea for you!

{| style="background-color: var(--background-color-success-subtle, #fdffe7); border: 1px solid var(--border-color-success, #fceb92); color: var(--color-base, #202122);"
|style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 5px;" | 120px ↗
|style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;" | thank you sincerely for your contributions!! :) <span style="font-family: century gothic;">'''x'''<u> RozuRozu </u> • ''<sup>'''t'''ea</sup><sub>'''c'''ups</sub> ↗''</span> 03:40, 22 January 2025 (UTC)
|}

Notice

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion

link=|25px|alt=Information icon ↗
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring ↗ regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring ↗.  Thank you. Stockenboi (talk) 20:18, 1 March 2025 (UTC)

:Regarding the Pro-EU. I plan to join a discussion which is on Social Democrats (Denmark) ↗ and Social Democratic Party of Germany ↗ if parties should or should not have their EU stance on the infobox (personally I think it should be listed). For the left-leaning/left-wing. I'm more than happy to have a discussion in the talk page of the party (Social Democratic Party of Switzerland ↗). Swiss People's Party ↗ had one not too long ago and a nice consensus had been reached (and I think one for SP/PS could be reached as well if a good amount of editors are engaged in the discussion like how they were in SVP's). ZlatanSweden10 (talk) 23:43, 1 March 2025 (UTC)

Hardcoding party names

Re edits like this ↗, the correct place to set the party's name for appearance in the infobox is the political party module series, e.g. Module:Political party/M ↗. Cheers, <span style="color: orange;">Number</span> <span style="color: green;">5</span><span style="color: blue;">7</span> ↗ 19:28, 2 March 2025 (UTC)

:Oh I never knew about this. Thanks for telling me! ZlatanSweden10 (talk) 21:04, 2 March 2025 (UTC)

Italics for 'foreign' political groups

Re: your change on 'National Rally' ↗, it appears you were correct. Where the name of a group is a 'borrowing' into English ''(eg Gestapo)'', we don't italicise, where it is wholly 'foreign' we do. Rassemblement bleu Marine ↗ would probably NOT be considered a borrowed name, as it isn't sufficiently well known in English. My apologies. Pincrete (talk) 04:42, 6 March 2025 (UTC)

:No worries! Always open to respectful discussions and light edit wars. ZlatanSweden10 (talk) 17:02, 6 March 2025 (UTC)

April 2025

25px|alt=Information icon ↗ Hello. Thank you for your contributions ↗ to Wikipedia ↗. I noticed that one or more recent edit(s) you made did not have an edit summary ↗. You can use the edit summary field to explain your reasoning for an edit, or to provide a description of what the edit changes. Summaries save time for other editors and reduce the chances that your edit will be misunderstood. For some edits, an adequate summary may be quite brief ↗.

The edit summary field looks like this:
{{Edit summary field/OOUI}}

'''Please provide an edit summary for every edit you make.''' With a Wikipedia account ↗, you can give yourself a reminder by setting {{myprefs|3|check={{int:tog-forceeditsummary}}}}, and then click the "{{int:saveprefs}}" button.
Thanks!{{sp}} Danners430 (talk) 17:14, 9 April 2025 (UTC)

:Understood! Will try to do so from now on! Apologies for not doing it earlier ZlatanSweden10 (talk) 17:21, 9 April 2025 (UTC)
::I noticed this as well in your recent edit to Likud ↗ (a topic area where edit summaries are extra important). Your stats show that more than 80% of your edits ↗ are without a summary — it would definitely help other editors for you to try to get that number as close to zero as you can! <span style="border:3px outset;border-radius:8pt 0;padding:1px 5px;background:linear-gradient(6rad,#86c,#2b9)"><span style="color:#FFF;text-decoration:inherit;font:1em Lucida Sans">Sdkb</span></span> <sup>'''talk'''</sup> 18:27, 25 April 2025 (UTC)
:::Got it! I should've done one for Likud since they're such a hot topic globally. I'll try get it to close to zero as possible! ZlatanSweden10 (talk) 23:05, 25 April 2025 (UTC)

Reversal of edit in Liberals infobox

Hi @ZlatanSweden10, I saw your reversal of my edit and your accompanying comment. Since you seemed confused about what was trying to be achieved, I am happy to discuss it. The idea is to replace the manual composition bars (<code><nowiki>{{composition bar|16|349|hex={{party color|Liberal People's Party (Sweden)}}}}</nowiki></code>) with automated calls to wikidata (<code><nowiki>{{Political party data|seat composition bar|ms-lower-house|percent=yes}}</nowiki></code>). Though you might have caught this at the wrong moment where something broke, but it's been remedied to. Julius Schwarz (talk) 13:28, 28 April 2025 (UTC)

:Hi! I understand now what you mean. Absolutely continue with what you're trying to do but your original edit which I have new reverted completely broke the infobox! Try do what you were trying to do but make sure it doesn't break the infobox by clicking show preview (or do it via the visual editor instead of the source editor). Best of luck! ZlatanSweden10 (talk) 13:35, 28 April 2025 (UTC)
::Of course, of course. That was on me, I made the wrong edit and it broke everything. It is now reverted and back to normal. Further will continue (has it should have) in the sandbox. Unless you have done it already, I will go ahead and reinstate the changed. Thanks again! Julius Schwarz (talk) 13:36, 28 April 2025 (UTC)
:::No worries! Just did a minor edit since the percentages aren't needed. ZlatanSweden10 (talk) 14:12, 28 April 2025 (UTC)
::::Actually, you are the second person to mention this, but the first never followed up on my question: where does it come from that it is not needed? Is there a consensus on this? On a personal level, I actually find it quite useful, so I am tempted to put it everywhere, but I also want to respect a consensus if there is one. Julius Schwarz (talk) 14:27, 28 April 2025 (UTC)
:::::No I agree. I do think it's useful. In the Swedish pages (or non-English pages) for example I always see percentages for all parties. But in the English wikipedia I have never (and I mean never) have seen it. I'm not sure why this is the case.
:::::I assume it's due to the percentages being rounded and not precise (as some parliaments are odd numbers). Therefore, of not real use since the numbers wouldn't be accurate as a hypothetical coalition would equal 50% instead of 51% of someone were to do some basic maths for looking at seat compositions for a legislature (best example I have is Landtag of Thuringia ↗, I think if the seats were viewed as %'s instead, it wouldn't equal the same as if it was pure numbers like it is now if I'm not wrong)?
:::::My best recommendation is bring it up to some administators, and or start a new topic in a big political party page such as the Republican Party (United States) ↗, Christian Democratic Union of Germany ↗, or elsewhere to get as many users as possible to talk with. Personally I don't mind the perecentages but I'm just following the customs. Plus I know compactness and simplicity is what many people strive for in infoboxes so the percentages may interrupt that goal of "compactness" and "simplicity". Regardless, I wish you luck in getting a consensus/official opinion on why there are no percentages in English Wikipedia when most/if not all non-English Wikipedia's have it! ZlatanSweden10 (talk) 16:48, 28 April 2025 (UTC)
::::::Ahah, thanks for the encouraging words. I will try and bring it up. For now, I need to focus on the translation aspect of the module I work on and then we'll see. Julius Schwarz (talk) 12:52, 29 April 2025 (UTC)

WP:IMAGESIZE ↗

"Except with very good reason, do not use <code>px</code> (e.g. <code>|thumb|300px</code>), which forces a fixed image width measured in pixels, disregarding the user's image size preference setting. In most cases {{nobr|1=<code>upright=''scaling_factor''</code>}} should be used, thereby respecting the user's base preference (which may have been selected for that user's particular devices)."

In most infoboxes, the parameter can be accessed by replacing "size" with "upright", e.g. <code>| logo_size =</code> → <code>| logo_upright =</code> . <big><span style="color:#757575; font-family:Consolas, monospace">''Yue''</span>🌙</big> 21:49, 1 May 2025 (UTC)

:Hi! Apologies for missing your message on my talk page. Could you give me a rundown of what you mean? I've adjusted many pages logo_size and logo_upright with no real issues or reverts. So I'm curious as to what I am doing wrong since I have had minimal (if no) issues at all in the past. Thanks in advance! ZlatanSweden10 (talk) 22:45, 23 July 2025 (UTC)

May 2025

30px|link= ↗ You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war ↗  according to the reverts you have made on :National Hockey League ↗. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate ↗ with others, to avoid editing disruptively ↗, and to try to reach a consensus ↗, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:
# '''Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;'''
# '''Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.'''
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page ↗ to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard ↗ or seek dispute resolution ↗. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection ↗. If you engage in an edit war, you '''may be blocked ↗ from editing.'''  – sbaio 13:07, 25 May 2025 (UTC)

:Hi Sbaio!
:I do not at all want to start an edit war. I also didn't do the edit out of preference but actually because I did the edit during the French abbreviation into bold a year or two ago but actually recently realised, I was wrong, so I revert it back into italics like I did the other day. Hope you understand. ZlatanSweden10 (talk) 14:52, 27 May 2025 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Deutschlandtakt ↗

25px|alt=Information icon ↗ Hello, ZlatanSweden10. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Deutschlandtakt ↗, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted ↗, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it ↗ again or request ↗ that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted ↗ so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 03:08, 15 June 2025 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Centrists (Liberal Party of Australia) ↗

48px|left|alt=|link= ↗

Hello, ZlatanSweden10. This message concerns the Articles for Creation ↗ submission or draft ↗ page you started, "Centrists ↗".

Drafts that go unedited for six months are eligible for deletion, in accordance with our draftspace policy ↗, and this one has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply {{edit|Draft:Centrists (Liberal Party of Australia)|edit the submission}}, and remove the {{tlc|db-afc}}, {{tlc|db-draft}}, or {{tlc|db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you read this, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions '''here''' ↗. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the draft so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia!  DreamRimmer bot II (talk) 12:25, 24 June 2025 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Deutschlandtakt ↗

48px|left|alt=|link= ↗
Hello, ZlatanSweden10. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation ↗ submission or draft ↗ page you started, "Deutschlandtakt ↗".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion ↗. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing.  <span style="font-family:Papyrus; color:#800080;">'''''L'''''iz</span> <sup style="font-family: Times New Roman; color: #006400;">'''''Read!''''' ↗ '''''Talk!'''''</sup> 02:36, 13 July 2025 (UTC)

ArbCom 2025 Elections voter message

<div class="ivmbox " style="margin-bottom: 1em; border: 1px solid #a2a9b1; background-color: #fdf2d5; padding: 0.5em; display: flex; align-items: center; ">
<div class="ivmbox-image" style="padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em;flex-basis: 40px">40px ↗</div>
<div class="ivmbox-text">
Hello! Voting in the '''2025 Arbitration Committee elections ↗''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2025|end}}-1 day}}. All '''eligible users ↗''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee ↗ is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process ↗. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans ↗, topic bans ↗, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy ↗ describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please review the candidates ↗ and submit your choices on the '''2025|poll}}|voting page ↗'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. <small>MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:54, 18 November 2025 (UTC)</small>

</div>
</div>

Happy First Edit Anniversary ZlatanSweden10 🎉

Hey @ZlatanSweden10. Your wiki edit anniversary is today, marking 5 years of dedicated contributions to English Wikipedia. Your passion for sharing knowledge and your remarkable contributions have not only enriched the project, but also inspired countless others to contribute. Thank you for your amazing contributions. Wishing you many more wonderful years ahead in the Wiki journey. :) -<span style="color:#990000">❙❚❚</span><span style="color:#339966">❙❙</span><span style="font-variant:small-caps;color:#000"> GnOeee </span><span style="color:#006699">❚❙❚</span><span style="color:#339966">❙❙</span> ✉ 18:01, 9 December 2025 (UTC)

January 2026

30px|link=|alt=Copyright problem icon ↗ Your edit to :Houston Metro ↗ has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted ↗ material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission ↗ from the copyright holder. If you {{em|are}} the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials ↗ for information on how to contribute your work appropriately. For legal reasons, Wikipedia strictly cannot host copyrighted text or images from print media or digital platforms without an appropriate ↗ and verifiable license. Contributions infringing on copyright will be removed. You may use external websites or publications as a source of {{em|information}}, but not as a source of {{em|content}}, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy '''will be blocked from editing ↗'''. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources ↗ for more information.  '''<span style="background:#2dc84d; color:#0033a0; padding:2px;">Sounder</span><span style="background:#7ce0d3; color:black; padding:2px;">Bruce</span>''' 00:59, 7 January 2026 (UTC)

:My apologies! I'll rewrite it into my own words in the future. ZlatanSweden10 (talk) 13:32, 19 January 2026 (UTC)

25px|alt=Information icon ↗ Please do not use styles that are nonstandard, unusual, inappropriate or difficult to understand in articles, as you did in :Chūō Shinkansen ↗. There is a Manual of Style ↗, and edits should not deliberately go against it without special reason. ''Don't split things into separate list items to simulate line breaks. This is non-semantic.'' XtraJovial (talk • contribs ↗) 03:02, 19 January 2026 (UTC)

:Understood! ZlatanSweden10 (talk) 13:32, 19 January 2026 (UTC)

April 2026

Your edit make some information of ideology of Ethiopian People's Revolutionary Democratic Front ↗ disappeared. Please fix this immediately. Nguyenduong2601 (talk) 07:42, 23 April 2026 (UTC)

Refn and lit templates

Hello. Please could you stop adding the refn template to articles – it creates a mess in the references section because the superscript reference number appears there, and then redirects to another reference in the section.

Please could you also stop adding the separate lit. template to articles that use the langx template – it has a built-in lit. function. You are welcome to suggest adding a tooltip to it if you think that would be an improvement. Cheers, <span style="color: orange;">Number</span> <span style="color: green;">5</span><span style="color: blue;">7</span> ↗ 23:24, 6 May 2026 (UTC)