W
Active Editors
Back to Profile

User Talk: CharlieMehta

Server-side rendered snapshot of this editor's Wikipedia talk page discussions.

{{talk page}}
{{User:ClueBot III/ArchiveThis
| age =2160
| archiveprefix =User talk:CharlieMehta/Archive
| numberstart =1
| maxarchsize =75000
| header ={{Archive}}
| minkeepthreads =5
| format = %%i
}}{{Archives|bot=ClueBot III|age=90}}
<!-- Template:Setup cluebot archiving -->

I have sent you a note about a page you started



Hi CharlieMehta. Thank you for your work on Hezekiah Moscow ↗. Another editor, Mariamnei, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol ↗ and left the following comment:

{{Bq|1=Nice start!}}

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{code|<nowiki>{{Re|</nowiki>Mariamnei<nowiki>}}</nowiki>}}. <small>(Message delivered via the Page Curation ↗ tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)</small><!-- Template:Sentnote-NPF -->

Mariamnei (talk) 07:36, 17 March 2026 (UTC)

:Thank you and much appreciated. Will keep improving the article. Charlie (talk) 07:46, 17 March 2026 (UTC)

KL University


what is you problem? Stop falsely accusing and abusing fellow editors without proof. I dont understand from where you poped up suddenly. I felt abused by u. '''I am not directly or indirectly compensated by any university on wikipedia or any university on planet Earth and planet Mars'''. If you are doing this to abuse and threaten fellow editors on the planet earth, Kindly stop wasting other editors time. Thanks.Univofbegumpet (talk) 15:34, 14 April 2026 (UTC)

30px|alt=Stop icon ↗ Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an '''edit war ↗'''. This means that you are repeatedly changing a page's content back to how you believe it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree with your changes. Please ''stop editing the page'' and use the '''talk page ↗''' to work toward creating a version of the page that represents consensus ↗ among the editors involved. Wikipedia provides a page explaining how this is accomplished ↗. If discussions reach an impasse, you can request help at a relevant noticeboard ↗ or seek dispute resolution ↗ such as a third opinion ↗. In some cases, you may wish to request page protection ↗ while a discussion to resolve the dispute is ongoing.

'''If you continue edit warring, you may be blocked from editing ↗ Wikipedia'''&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule ↗, which states that an editor ''must not perform more than three reverts ↗ on a single page within a 24-hour period''. Undoing another editor's work&mdash;whether in whole or in part, or whether it involves the same or different material each time&mdash;counts as a revert. Also, please keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;'''even if you do not violate the three-revert rule'''&mdash; if things indicate that you intend to continue reverting content on the page. Univofbegumpet (talk) 13:48, 13 April 2026 (UTC)

:@Univofbegumpet Thank you for your message. My edits were made in good faith to improve accuracy and neutrality, not to engage in edit warring. If you still have concerns, please feel free to report it. I am confident it will be reviewed fairly. For the time being, please refrain from editing KL University’s page until you explain why you are so keen to remove information stating that the university has been barred from NAAC accreditation for 5 years. Charlie (talk) 09:12, 15 April 2026 (UTC)
::For your info, I have restored all details of NAAC Ban. If it is barred from NAAC keep it in the article, I dont have any problem with it. Why are you removing content contributed by me? without mentioning it in edit summaries? Furthermore, if you abuse me again on paid promotions I will complain. Pls explain ur issues in edit summaries, this falls under edit conflict on content not paid promotion. There is no paid promotion here, I am no way connected to any university. Univofbegumpet (talk) 09:43, 15 April 2026 (UTC)
:::@Univofbegumpet Please avoid presenting the edits in a way that may come across as overly assertive. I was the one who re-added the NAAC bribery case to the lead section after it had been removed multiple times earlier by you. It now seems to have been rearranged again (by you), along with the addition of the NIRF ranking, and also you are trying to present everything as your own edit in this conversation. It would be best if you refrain from editing the KL University page for the time being. If you have any queries, please respond on the KL University talk page as requested earlier. Charlie (talk) 10:04, 15 April 2026 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Destubathon of the Americas ↗


You are invited to participate in the '''Destubathon of the Americas ↗''', a contest/editathon which will run from May 1 to May 31. The goal is to destub as many of our 475,000+ stubs for the Americas (from Alaska down to Chile) as possible. A good chance to have fun in expanding many of our old stale stubs and win up to £2000 ($2680) in Amazon vouchers for expanding stub articles. Sign up in the Contestants/participants section on the contest page if interested. Even if not interested in prizes you are still warmly welcome to participate in it as an editathon! Hopefully we can achieve something significant in the month of May together! ♦ <span style="font-variant:small-caps;color:#aba67e">''Dr. Blofeld''</span> 16:48, 15 April 2026 (UTC)

:@Dr. Blofeld Count me in and thanks for sharing. Charlie (talk) 02:13, 16 April 2026 (UTC)

Nomination of :2024 WazirX hack ↗ for deletion


<div class="afd-notice">
<div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0;">48px|alt=|link= ↗</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article :2024 WazirX hack ↗ is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines ↗ or whether it should be deleted ↗.

The article is being discussed at '''Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2024 WazirX hack ↗''' until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the AfD notice from the article until the discussion is closed.<!-- Template:Afd notice --></div> Bridget&nbsp;(talk) 11:21, 16 April 2026 (UTC)

:@Bridget Thanks for the message. Let me share my opinion at the AfD. Charlie (talk) 23:52, 16 April 2026 (UTC)

New pages patrol May 2026 Backlog drive



{| style="border: 2px solid #36c; border-radius: 4px; background: linear-gradient(to right, #ffffff, #eaf3ff); padding: 10px; color: #000;"
| style="vertical-align: middle; font-size: 130%" | May 2026 Backlog Drive ↗ | <span style="font-size: 85%">'''New pages patrol ↗''' </span>
| rowspan=3 | right|100px ↗
|-
|
|-
|colspan=2 style="font-size:85%; padding-top:15px;"|You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here. ↗
|}
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:23, 29 April 2026 (UTC)
<!-- Message sent by User:DreamRimmer@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:New_pages_patrol/Reviewers/Newsletter_list&oldid=1350894664 -->
:Cannot participate. I don't have the rights. Charlie (talk) 11:32, 29 April 2026 (UTC)

New Page Patrol Newsletter - May 2026



<div style="border:2px solid #90C0FF; background:#F0F0FF; width:99%; padding:4px">
<!-- do not use ;Header to make bold headers per H:DL ↗, causes errors for screen readers -->
Hello {{BASEPAGENAME}},

thumb|400px|New Page Review queue November 2025 - May 2026 ↗

'''Backlog update'''

At the time of this message, there are 15,282 articles and 32,951 redirects awaiting review.

After the January–February drive the article backlog was reduced to 15,179 articles and the redirect backlog to 19,053 respectively. Great job! However, both queues are growing rapidly and any additional reviews are highly appreciated.

'''2024 and 2025 NPP Awards'''

74px|left ↗{{no ping|JTtheOG}} was selected as the NPP reviewer of the year for both 2024 and 2025, for reviewing the most articles amongst all reviewers.
{{no ping|Hey man im josh}} and {{no ping|MPGuy2824}} won the Redirect Ninja Master Award for 2024 and 2025 respectively, for reviewing the most redirects.

Overall in 2024, one Platinum, two Gold, eight Silver, 12 Bronze and 45 Iron Barnstars were awarded. Additionally, 66 reviewers got the NPP barnstar for doing more than 100 reviews through the year. In 2025, one Platinum, ten Silver, 13 Bronze and 38 Iron Barnstars were awarded. Additionally, 38 reviewers got the NPP barnstar for doing more than 100 reviews through the year.

{{no ping|BoyTheKingCanDance}}, {{no ping|Rosiestep}}, {{no ping|SunDawn}}, and {{no ping|Vanderwaalforces}} were inducted into the NPP Hall of Fame ↗ for having two separate years of 2,000+ article reviews.

'''January–February backlog drive'''

The experimental two-month long backlog drive concluded with 183 reviewers patrolling over 27,761 articles and 35,309 redirects, earning over 36,836 points. Congratulations to {{no ping|JTtheOG}}, who achieved first place with 6,484.6 points in this drive.

'''May backlog drive'''

An article-only backlog drive is currently underway. We are hoping to make a big dent in the backlog. You can read more about it or join at Wikipedia:New pages patrol/Backlog drives/May 2026 ↗.

'''PageTriage'''

An attempt was made to get the New Pages Feed ↗ to sort by date marked as reviewed instead of date created. However we had to revert it due to bugs. We may try again in the future. You can subscribe to the Phabricator ticket ↗ if you're interested in following along.

{{refbegin}}
'''Reminders:'''

{{refend}}
</div>

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:37, 14 May 2026 (UTC)
<!-- Message sent by User:Novem Linguae@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:New_pages_patrol/Reviewers/Newsletter_list&oldid=1353812553 -->

Books & Bytes – Issue 74



<div lang="en" dir="ltr" class="mw-content-ltr"> <div style = "font-size: 1.5em; margin: 0 100px"> right|175px ↗</div> <div style = "line-height: 1.2"> <span style="font-size: 2em; font-family: Copperplate, 'Copperplate Gothic Light', serif">'''The Wikipedia Library''': ''Books & Bytes''</span><br /> Issue 74, March–April 2026 </div> <div style = "margin-top: 1.5em; border: 3px solid #ae8c55; border-radius: .5em; padding: 1em 1.5em; font-size: 1.2em">
<big>'''Read the full newsletter ↗'''</big> </div> </div> <small>Sent by MediaWiki message delivery ↗ on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team – 10:35, 2 June 2026 (UTC)</small>

(This message was sent to :User:CharlieMehta ↗ and is being posted here due to a redirect.)
<!-- Message sent by User:Samwalton9 (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=The_Wikipedia_Library/Newsletter/Recipients&oldid=30576650 -->

June 2026



25px|alt=Information icon ↗ Thank you for your contributions ↗ to Wikipedia. Regarding your recent edits to :Sir Seewoosagur Ramgoolam Memorial Centre for Culture ↗ when you modified the page, you introduced {{cl|Unknown parameters|unknown parameters}}. Just because you specify {{para|some_param|{{var|some_variable}}}} does not always mean that variable will display. The {{para|some_param}} must be defined in the template. You can look at the documentation for the template you are using but it is also helpful to use the preview ↗ button before you save your edit; this helps you find any errors you have made and ensure that the values you have added are displaying correctly. Below the edit box is a '''Show preview''' button. Pressing this will show you what the page will look like without actually saving it. It is strongly recommended that you use this before saving. Note I have likely fixed the error by now so check the history ↗ of the page to see how it was fixed. If you have any questions, contact the help desk ↗ for assistance.
Thank you.<!-- User:Zackmann08/uw/Unknown-params-warning --> '''<span style="color:#00d5ff !important">Zack</span><span style="color:#007F94 !important">mann</span>''' (<sup>Talk to me ↗</sup>/<sub><span style="color:orange !important">What I been doing</span> ↗</sub>) 16:42, 3 June 2026 (UTC)

Editing 2026 CBSE On-Screen Marking controversy ↗



Hello, I'm Vkwiki100. I'm writing to let you know that I plan to make substantial changes to this article. At present, it lacks a clear structure and is missing important information related to the subject.
As you are the article's creator and a major contributor to it, I thought it would be courteous to inform you in advance to help avoid any misunderstandings or potential edit-warring. If you're interested, you can look at my previous Wikipedia contributions to get an idea of my editing style. I would also recommend taking a look at the article 2024 NEET controversy ↗, which I substantially expanded and reorganized. Thank you. <span style="font-family: Times New Roman;"><span style="color: white;background:grey;padding:2px">VK</span>&nbsp;<span style="color:black;background:darkgrey;padding:2px">wiki100</span></span> 05:34, 7 June 2026 (UTC)

:@Vkwiki100 I appreciate the courtesy, although there was no need to notify me. But, of course thank you for being nice. Just try to keep it neutral, well-sourced, and free from sensationalism. And, try not to use AI-generated text. Charlie (talk) 07:03, 7 June 2026 (UTC)
::@Vkwiki100 I checked the new text with GPTZero, and it scored 66% AI. That's why I have restored the last stable, non-AI version for now. Please feel free to re-edit or expand the section using your own words. I appreciate your effort and good faith contributions to the page. Charlie (talk) 14:26, 7 June 2026 (UTC)
:::I am not saying the whole page should be 0% AI... at GPTZero. However, 66% is just too high. Charlie (talk) 14:28, 7 June 2026 (UTC)
::::Actually I write it in my words but as english is not my first language it contains some grammatical errors and some words which might not be formal or encyclopaedic. I use Gemini to correct grammar. I think that paraphrasing by Gemini is resulting in this GPTZero score. Can you suggest me some solution to this. <span style="font-family: Times New Roman;"><span style="color: white;background:grey;padding:2px">VK</span>&nbsp;<span style="color:black;background:darkgrey;padding:2px">wiki100</span></span> 14:47, 7 June 2026 (UTC)
:::::If you do not have expertise in the language, I advise you not to edit the page, though the choice is yours. If you still want to go ahead, please run any text you want to add through GPTZero and edit it there until it passes the AI check. As a free user, you receive 10,000 credits per month, which is more than enough for this editing work. Charlie (talk) 14:55, 7 June 2026 (UTC)
::::::I think copy editing is not problematic using AI per WP:LLM ↗. So, I think I can continue doing that, as I have used AI for copy editing in my previous edits too and even got an article to GA status. But since it is showing as AI-generated on GPTZero, I believe I need to paraphrase it so that it does not get flagged as AI-generated. Also, whatever I am adding satisfies WP:NPOV ↗, WP:V ↗, WP:RS ↗, and WP:NOR ↗. <span style="font-family: Times New Roman;"><span style="color: white;background:grey;padding:2px">VK</span>&nbsp;<span style="color:black;background:darkgrey;padding:2px">wiki100</span></span> 16:17, 7 June 2026 (UTC)
:::::::No matter what, do not get blocked for using AI. Charlie (talk) 03:03, 8 June 2026 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation ↗: George Camille ↗ (July 9)


<div style="border: solid 1px #FCC; background-color: var(--background-color-warning-subtle, #fdf2d5); color: inherit; padding: 0.5em 1em; margin: 1.5em; width: 90%;">'''Draft declined'''{{pb}}50px|left ↗Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Your draft submission to Articles for creation ↗ has been reviewed but not accepted at this time.{{pb}}
<nowiki> </nowiki>'''Feedback'''{{pb}}The reviewer, Zippybonzo, left the following feedback:
{{divbox|gray|3=This draft is not written from a neutral point of view ↗. Wikipedia articles must be written neutrally in a formal, impersonal, and dispassionate way. They should not read like a blog post, advertisement, or fan page. Rewrite the draft to remove:

Instead, only summarize in your own words a range of independent, reliable, published sources ↗ that discuss the subject.|}}<!--
--
-->

'''Next steps'''

'''Need help?'''

'''Scam warning'''
Zippybonzo &#124; <small>talk</small> &#124; <small>contribs</small> ↗ (they/them) 10:04, 9 July 2026 (UTC)</div><!--Template:AfC decline-->

{| style="margin: 0.4em 2em;"
|- style="vertical-align: top;"
| alt=Teahouse logo ↗
| <div style="background-color:#e1e6db; color: #393D38; padding: 1em; font-size: 1.1em; border-radius:10px;box-shadow:-2px -2px 1px #8e8a78;">Hello, '''CharlieMehta'''!
Having a draft declined at Articles for creation can be disappointing, but don't be discouraged, it's common when creating your first article ↗.

'''Need help?'''



|}<!-- Wikipedia:Teahouse/AfC Invitation -->
Category:Wikipedians who have received a Teahouse invitation through AfC ↗