User Talk: Chess enjoyer
Server-side rendered snapshot of this editor's Wikipedia talk page discussions.
{{talk header}}
{{User:MiszaBot/config
| algo = old(90d)
| archive = User talk:Chess enjoyer/Archive %(counter)d
| counter = 1
| maxarchivesize = 400K
| archiveheader = {{Archive}}
| minthreadstoarchive = 1
| minthreadsleft = 6
}}
Reminder: WP:FAITH
Hi, I'm The username filter bot is way too sensitive. I noticed that you provided a warning to a user after reverting vandalism(thanks!) but jumped immediately to their final warning. As per WP:FAITH β, users are generally supposed to assume that others are acting with good intentions. Next time, it might be better to start with the first warning(<nowiki>{{subst:Uw-vandalism1}}</nowiki>. Thank you! The username filter bot is way too sensitive (talk) 16:14, 24 April 2026 (UTC)
:I can see why you think I was harsh (and maybe I should have used the second-level warning instead), but how could changing the short description of a living person to "twat" possibly be in good faith? Chess enjoyer (talk) 16:17, 24 April 2026 (UTC)
::Also, {{re|The username filter bot is way too sensitive|p=,}} I see that you've been reverting vandalism, too (thank you!). You should consider enabling twinkle β. It makes reverting and leaving user warnings a lot easier. Chess enjoyer (talk) 16:22, 24 April 2026 (UTC)
::{{tpw}} Second-level would've been fine, probably (maybe can change now...?). The edit could've been a joke or nonserious, so first-level is fine, unless it's repeated behavior. That's the point of warnings, but you know that. I'd just say that final was WP:BITE βy. π« <span style="color:maroon;">'''Crash // Organhaver'''</span> (β''itβ/βhe''β|β''<span style="color:darkred;">talk to me, maybe?</span>''β) 16:47, 24 April 2026 (UTC)
:::You're right. I went overboard because it was a biography of a living person β, and we're supposed be more cautious around those. I tend to go straight to level two if there's no chance the edit was in good faith and it contained slurs or something, but using an only warning there was excessive. Chess enjoyer (talk) 16:57, 24 April 2026 (UTC)
::::Yeah, it probably was clearly not good faith. I definitely agree with level two-ish for this warning. Also, thanks for the recommendation of Twinkle. I'll see if I can install it soon. The username filter bot is way too sensitive (talk) 17:34, 24 April 2026 (UTC)
Your response about word count
I will gladly stop replying, but just noting that (I think) I am at just about 1000 words, or a little over, within that discussion. I'm assuming the extra 800 also encompasses the many other discussions on that page. π β Chicdat ''<sup style="font-family:Times New Roman">Bawk to me!</sup>'' 18:40, 25 April 2026 (UTC)
:See my recent revert. I may have gotten confused. Chess enjoyer (talk) 18:41, 25 April 2026 (UTC)
::I was wrong. You've still got ~60 words, not counting the quotes and the text you struck. Sorry about that. Chess enjoyer (talk) 18:50, 25 April 2026 (UTC)
Thanks, Chess enjoyer!
Just wanted to say thank you for fixing my spelling mistakes on the userbox categories. Yikes. I don't even think "humourous" is the correct spelling in ''any'' dialect?? Yeah, uh, the redirect {{noredir|Humourous}} is an {{tl|R from misspelling}}. Another yikes.
<small>I knew there was at least one U β, somewhere, at least...</small> π« <span style="color:maroon;">'''Crash // Organhaver'''</span> (β''itβ/βhe''β|β''<span style="color:darkred;">talk to me, maybe?</span>''β) 20:21, 28 April 2026 (UTC)
:You're welcome. I thought it was a British-English spelling. I looked it up on Wiktionary β, and it turns out we're both right; it's a misspelling that only occurs over there. Chess enjoyer (talk) 20:28, 28 April 2026 (UTC)
::Beautiful. π« <span style="color:maroon;">'''Crash // Organhaver'''</span> (β''itβ/βhe''β|β''<span style="color:darkred;">talk to me, maybe?</span>''β) 20:31, 28 April 2026 (UTC)
I have sent you a note about a page you started
Hi Chess enjoyer. Thank you for your work on Chlaenius extensus β. Another editor, Mariamnei, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:
Thank you for your work on this article. Please add more sources. Thanks and have a great day!
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Mariamnei}}. Mariamnei (talk) 11:17, 29 April 2026 (UTC)
AfC β notification: Draft:Acasta alba β has a new comment
<div style="border:solid 1px #9accf6;background:#f1f9ff; padding: 0.5em 1em; color: #000; margin: 1.5em; width: 90%;"> 50px|left β
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Acasta alba β. Thanks! Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 17:46, 29 April 2026 (UTC) </div>
Your submission at Articles for creation β: Acasta alba β has been accepted
<div style="border:solid 1px #57DB1E; background:var(--background-color-success-subtle, #dff2eb); padding: 0.5em 1em; color: inherit; margin: 1.5em; width: 90%;">50px|left β '''Acasta alba β, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been accepted!'''<br />
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions. <br />
The article has been assessed as '''Stub-Class''', which is recorded on its talk page β. It is common for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time β. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme β to see how you can improve the article.
- See the quality assessment scheme β to find out how to improve the article.
'''Future articles'''
<div class="autoconfirmed-show">
- Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself β without submitting a draft for review. However, you may continue submitting drafts to Articles for creation β if you prefer.</div>
- Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself β without posting a request to Articles for creation β.</div>
'''Next steps'''
- Find other Wikipedia articles related to your topic and add links pointing to the new article β. This helps readers find it.
- Group the article with similar subjects by adding relevant categories β.
- You may consider nominating a fact from the article β within the next 7 days to appear on the Main Page's Did you know section β.
- Wikipedia is a work in progress. You can continue to expand and improve the new article.
- The new article will become eligible to be indexed on search engines β once patrolled or after 90 days; search engines may take time to reflect this.
- For friendly peer support regarding editing, sourcing, or policies, visit the Teahouse β, a question and answer hub for new editors.
Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 17:47, 29 April 2026 (UTC)</div><!--Template:AfC accept-->
Discussion at AfD
25px|link=|alt= β You are invited to join the discussion at :Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/IranβUnited States war β. <!-- Template:Please see --> β'''<span style="color:#FFF;text-shadow:0px 0px 4px #000,0px 0px 4px #000">Gluonz</span><sup> talk contribs β</sup>''' 05:05, 2 May 2026 (UTC)
Timelash
Unless they have reverted it, which they haven't, there is no reason to remove the CSD. <i style="font-family:cursive,Serif;text-shadow:1px 1px 2px #f008;background:linear-gradient(90deg,#fb0,#f0b);-webkit-background-clip:text;-webkit-text-fill-color:#0000">β LuniZunie</i><sub>(talk)</sub> 19:05, 11 May 2026 (UTC)
:The CSD actually also helps bring admin attention, the only reason to wait until the block is if you know they are going to edit war. <i style="font-family:cursive,Serif;text-shadow:1px 1px 2px #f008;background:linear-gradient(90deg,#fb0,#f0b);-webkit-background-clip:text;-webkit-text-fill-color:#0000">β LuniZunie</i><sub>(talk)</sub> 19:07, 11 May 2026 (UTC)
::@LuniZunie, I just thought it was too soon. You and I both knew we were looking at a duck β quacking into a megaphone, but that G5 couldn't be actioned until they were actually blocked as one. I hadn't thought about it bringing admin attention, though. Chess enjoyer (talk) 19:40, 11 May 2026 (UTC)
:::It can actually be actioned before they are blocked, the being blocked is based on the master account; which is blocked. <i style="font-family:cursive,Serif;text-shadow:1px 1px 2px #f008;background:linear-gradient(90deg,#fb0,#f0b);-webkit-background-clip:text;-webkit-text-fill-color:#0000">β LuniZunie</i><sub>(talk)</sub> 19:42, 11 May 2026 (UTC)
ec override
I chose mine β, but yes, thanks! Valereee (talk) 23:18, 15 May 2026 (UTC)
:You're welcome, and don't feel bad about it: I've {{diff||1318749716|label=made the same mistake}} myself {{diff||1346931957|label=a couple of times}} :) Chess enjoyer (talk) 23:31, 15 May 2026 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation β: Bourguyia bocaina β has been accepted
<div style="border:solid 1px #57DB1E; background:var(--background-color-success-subtle, #dff2eb); padding: 0.5em 1em; color: inherit; margin: 1.5em; width: 90%;">50px|left β '''Bourguyia bocaina β, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been accepted!'''<br />
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
- See the quality assessment scheme β to find out how to improve the article.
'''Future articles'''
<div class="autoconfirmed-show">
- Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself β without submitting a draft for review. However, you may continue submitting drafts to Articles for creation β if you prefer.</div>
- Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself β without posting a request to Articles for creation β.</div>
'''Next steps'''
- Find other Wikipedia articles related to your topic and add links pointing to the new article β. This helps readers find it.
- Group the article with similar subjects by adding relevant categories β.
- You may consider nominating a fact from the article β within the next 7 days to appear on the Main Page's Did you know section β.
- Wikipedia is a work in progress. You can continue to expand and improve the new article.
- The new article will become eligible to be indexed on search engines β once patrolled or after 90 days; search engines may take time to reflect this.
- For friendly peer support regarding editing, sourcing, or policies, visit the Teahouse β, a question and answer hub for new editors.
<span>EatingCarBatteries</span> <sub>(contribs β | talk β)</sub> 21:04, 18 May 2026 (UTC)</div><!--Template:AfC accept-->
Wikiproject
Hello Chessenjoyer, I am attempting to create a wikiproject on Chess Streamers. I have got 3-5 people and need others. Would you consider joining ? We could use your experience. &RezAlt! (talk) 02:44, 23 May 2026 (UTC)
:Hi &RezAlt!. Thanks for offering, but I'm not particularly interested in editing in that topic area. If you haven't already, you might want to give this page β a read. Chess enjoyer (talk) 03:48, 23 May 2026 (UTC)
::Thank you anyways ! &RezAlt! (talk) 14:30, 23 May 2026 (UTC)
a barnstar for u!
thumb|100px|alexa gives this to u as well! β
{| style="border: 1px solid gray; background-color: #fdffe7;"
|rowspan="2" style="vertical-align:middle;" | {{#ifeq:alt|alt|100px β|100px β}}
|rowspan="2" |
|style="font-size: x-large; padding: 0; vertical-align: middle; height: 1.1em;" | '''The Minor Barnstar'''
|-
|style="vertical-align: middle; border-top: 1px solid gray;" | most of ur edits r le minor housekeepinβ type, so its fittinβ to give u this! <span style= "color:#cc2a2b; text-decoration:inherit">'''Alto'''</span>Hampton t β’ c β β’ g β’ s 02:26, 27 May 2026 (UTC)
|}
:Thanks to both of you :)
: I've been wondering how accurate that descriptor is, though. I first added it to my user page {{diff||1307180926|label=a while ago}}. Chess enjoyer β (talk) 02:35, 27 May 2026 (UTC)
::thx! oh, and sign me guestbook too! alexa will be waitinβ for u there. <span style= "color:#cc2a2b; text-decoration:inherit">'''Alto'''</span>Hampton t β’ c β β’ g β’ s 02:36, 27 May 2026 (UTC)
:::{{done}}'''.''' Chess enjoyer β (talk) 02:42, 27 May 2026 (UTC)
somethinβ
regardinβ https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User%3AChess_enjoyer&diff=1356329344&oldid=1356271838 β, i dont mind alexa there. in fact, she might be cheerinβ u up there, so thereβs no need to remove her! <span style= "color:#cc2a2b; text-decoration:inherit">'''Alto'''</span>Hampton t β’ c β β’ g β’ s 03:05, 27 May 2026 (UTC)
:oh, and appreciate her in me sandbox if u want! sheβll be happy! <span style= "color:#cc2a2b; text-decoration:inherit">'''Alto'''</span>Hampton t β’ c β β’ g β’ s 03:10, 27 May 2026 (UTC)
:Gotcha. By the way, {{diff||1356330170|label=I don't believe I've given my preferred pronouns anywhere?}} They/them is a good default when you don't know. Chess enjoyer β (talk) 03:12, 27 May 2026 (UTC)
::@Chess enjoyer sure thing. <span style= "color:#cc2a2b; text-decoration:inherit">'''Alto'''</span>Hampton t β’ c β β’ g β’ s 03:20, 27 May 2026 (UTC)
Kim Ju Ae
back a couple hours ago i did a edit on your wikipedia about Kim Ju Ae and i was adding one of Kim Ju Aeβs latest appearances not putting in deceased people in it or anything just writing about that in march this year she was for sure driving a tank with kim jong un and top officials on top of it and just check the internet and news articles you may find this sorce of information Isaiahs role plays (talk) 06:08, 5 June 2026 (UTC)
:Hi. Was {{diff||1357877842|label=this edit}} you logged out? I ''was'' able to find a source that covered most of the content and cite it in the article, but you should really be citing sources ''yourself'' instead of expecting others to do it for you. Otherwise, editors are likely to remove it as unsourced, like I did initially. Chess enjoyer β (talk) 06:41, 5 June 2026 (UTC)
Rollback granted
right|130px β
Hi Chess enjoyer. After reviewing your request, I have <span class="plainlinks">enabled β</span> '''rollback β''' on your account. Please keep the following things in mind while using rollback:
- Being granted rollback is no more momentous than installing Twinkle β or Ultraviolet β. It just adds a ''[rollback]'' button next to a page's latest live revision. It does not grant you any additional "status" on Wikipedia, nor does it change how Wikipedia policies apply to you.
- Rollback should be used to revert <em>clear and unambiguous cases</em> of vandalism {{emu|only}}. <em>Never</em> use rollback to revert good faith edits. For more information about when rollback is appropriate, see {{section link|Wikipedia:Rollback|When to use rollback}}.
- Rollback should never be used to edit war β, and it should never be used in a content-related dispute to restore the page to your preferred revision. If rollback is abused or used for this purpose or any other inappropriate purpose, the permission will be revoked.
- Use common sense. If you're not sure about something, <strong>''ask!''</strong>
Game Show Congress
Does it seem a little WP:POINT βy to you that Katzrockso deliberately reinstated unsourced information to justify their "keep" !vote in the RFD? <span style="color:green">'''Ten Pound Hammer'''</span> (<small>they/them</small>) β’ <sup>(What did I screw up now?)</sup> 18:25, 8 June 2026 (UTC)
:Well, that guideline is about making edits you don't actually agree with to make a point, and I assume that Katzrockso genuinely thinks the information should be there. I don't think WP:POINT β applies. That being said:
:#{{ping|Katzrockso|p=}}, I would prefer that you add sources ''when'' you reinstate challenged material, not later, per WP:BURDEN β.
:#{{ping|TenPoundHammer|p=}}, I don't think {{diff||1358441602|label=this}} was a valid use of Rollback. It wasn't obvious vandalism, and none of the other uses of Rollback β seem to apply. Per point one, I think the edit was otherwise okay, it just needed an edit summary.
:Chess enjoyer β (talk) 18:52, 8 June 2026 (UTC)
::I was at work at the time, which is why I was unable to go search through the references I had previously uncovered when researching for the AfD nomination. No WP:BURDEN β challenge was stated, the material was initially removed for mentioning a "non notable org", which is an invalid reason for removal. WP:ARTN β and WP:NNC β make it clear that non-notable topics can certainly (and very often are) included ''within'' other articles, but they just don't warrant a standalone article. Katzrockso (talk) 20:27, 8 June 2026 (UTC)
:::Notability aside, I don't think any content that has a {{t|cn}} tag should be restored without a reference to a reliable source, regardless of whether the edit summary had an explicit burden challenge. However, I knew all of that would become moot once you added those sources, and that's why I didn't revert you myself. Chess enjoyer β (talk) 20:51, 8 June 2026 (UTC)
::::{{ping|Katzrockso}} my apologies for assuming bad faith. I still think the history of the article (again: A7'd, restored, AFD'd, deleted, upheld at DRV, then re-created by me anyway to mitigate off-site harassment) is enough that the redirect should not stand, per both WP:UNDUE β (other game show personnel were also at Game Show Congress; why this one in particular?) and WP:NOPAGE β (given the contentious history of the page). <span style="color:green">'''Ten Pound Hammer'''</span> (<small>they/them</small>) β’ <sup>(What did I screw up now?)</sup> 13:05, 9 June 2026 (UTC)
:::::WP:REDIRECTPURPOSE β states {{tq|Subtopics or other topics that are described or listed within a wider article. (Such redirects are often targeted to a particular section of the article.)}}. A7, AfD deletion and a DRV are not under the list of reasons to delete a redirect.
:::::But this is not RfD, so I'm not sure why we are discussing the merits of the redirect. Katzrockso (talk) 23:37, 9 June 2026 (UTC)
An WP:ARCA β request you commented on has been closed
Hello Chess enjoyer, a request you commented on at WP:ARCA β regarding the transgender healthcare and people β case has been closed and archived at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Clarification and Amendment/Archive 136#Clarification request: Transgender healthcare and people β. Regards, <span style="color:#C01933">'''~delta'''</span> <sub>{<span style="color:#003366">'''talk'''</span> β’ <span style="color:#003366">'''cont'''</span> β β’ π°π· β β’ π’ β}</sub> 21:08, 24 June 2026 (UTC)
question; just making sureβ¦
thumb|100px|Did you notice anything different about me? -Alexa β
did u notice that the alexa sprite has slightly changed? i'm just makin' sureβ¦ (she's on ur userpage anywayβ¦) <span style= "color:#cc2a2b; text-decoration:inherit">'''A'''</span><span style= "color:#282F75; text-decoration:inherit">H</span><span style= "color:#878787; text-decoration:inherit">R</span> β (g β’ s β’ c) 06:12, 25 June 2026 (UTC)
:Is that a new pair of shoes I see? <small>''Definitely'' didn't check the page history on Commons. Nope.</small> Chess enjoyer β (talk) 06:15, 25 June 2026 (UTC)
::yeah, i just had to fix the shoes to be closer to how she actually looks in reality. (yes, she is based off a real person with the '''exact''' same name) <span style= "color:#cc2a2b; text-decoration:inherit">'''A'''</span><span style= "color:#282F75; text-decoration:inherit">H</span><span style= "color:#878787; text-decoration:inherit">R</span> β (g β’ s β’ c) 00:28, 28 June 2026 (UTC)
Spreading Peace
<div style="border-style:solid; border-color:#000000; background-color:#AliceBlue; border-width:1px; text-align:left; padding:8px;" class="plainlinks">40px|left β
Issac I Navarro (talk) wishes you peace! <br />
Spread peace and goodwill by adding {{tls|WikiPeace}} to other's talk pages with a friendly message.</div><!-- Template:WikiPeace -->
I hope that when you see this message, it is uplifting! I sincerely appreciate that you responded to the ping on the RfC Talk:Clop (erotic fan art) β. I know that page can be a lot, and I wanted to show my gratitude for your edits. (also noted it is not {{Strikethrough|Cheese}} {{smiley}}) Issac I Navarro (talk) 02:00, 26 June 2026 (UTC)
:Thanks, and you're welcome :)
:Yeah, I didn't know if I wanted to join the ''heated'' debate going on over there, but I thought I should comment on something that involved me directly. Chess enjoyer β (talk) 02:29, 26 June 2026 (UTC)
::Sorry if you did not want a ping for that thread, though.
::I did find your rationale to be compelling regarding the non-explicit image. and wanted to point out why I had that stance. :) Issac I Navarro (talk) 02:33, 26 June 2026 (UTC)
:::No need to apologize, I don't mind being pinged. Chess enjoyer β (talk) 02:40, 26 June 2026 (UTC)
::::It is just that I understand, given the nature of the article (as it involves a childrenβs cartoon being turned into pornographic content), that some may not wish to engage with it. Also, as you mentioned with how it was getting heated, I felt that some WP:β₯ β to the involved editors was in order. Issac I Navarro (talk) 02:48, 26 June 2026 (UTC)
::::I hope this message was uplifting. Once again, thank you for your continued years of service and contributions on Wikipedia as a whole. Issac I Navarro (talk) 02:50, 26 June 2026 (UTC)
I have sent you a note about a page you started
Hi Chess enjoyer. Thank you for your work on Echinosocius elatensis β. Another editor, PeriodicEditor, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol β and left the following comment:
{{Bq|1=First 2 sources support the claim, but at least from the abstract, the 3rd one does not mention it, although it may in the actual article.}}
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{code|<nowiki>{{Re|</nowiki>PeriodicEditor<nowiki>}}</nowiki>}}. <small>(Message delivered via the Page Curation β tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)</small><!-- Template:Sentnote-NPF -->
PeriodicEditor (talk) 05:09, 11 July 2026 (UTC)