W
Active Editors
Back to Profile

User Talk: Consarn

Server-side rendered snapshot of this editor's Wikipedia talk page discussions.

{{DISPLAYTITLE:user talk:consarn}}
{{NoACEMM}}
{{bots|deny=KiranBOT}}
{{User:MiszaBot/config
| algo = old(69d)
| archive = User talk:Consarn/Archive %(counter)d
| counter = 1
| maxarchivesize = 169K
| archiveheader = {{Archive}}
| minthreadstoarchive = 6
| minthreadsleft = 9
}}

"do wrong right", my mommy used to say. this probably meant "if you're here to vandalize wikis, at least make it funny, you filthy casual"

<div style="text-transform: lowercase;">{{Archive box}}</div>

A barnstar for you!



{| style="background-color: var(--background-color-success-subtle, #fdffe7); border: 1px solid var(--border-color-success, #fceb92); color: var(--color-base, #202122);"
|rowspan="2" style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 5px;" | 100px ↗
|style="font-size: x-large; padding: 3px 3px 0 3px; height: 1.5em;" | '''The Defender of the Wiki Barnstar'''
|-
|style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;" | Thank you for a genuinely excellent, humorous, and pertinent deconstruction of Larry Sanger's Nine Theses. You put all my concerns into words I couldn't articulate, with your usual dose of wit and sarcasm. <span style="background-color: RoyalBlue; border-radius: 1em; padding: 3px 3px 3px 3px;">'''<span style="color: GhostWhite">qcne</span>''' <small><span style="color: GhostWhite">(talk)</span></small></span> 09:06, 4 October 2025 (UTC)
|}

:Yes indeed, I was coming here to give you a barnstar for that but <del>noticed that you considered east Peru a place</del> had already received one. Your post was quite a pleasant read but the humor did not muddle the meaning a bit. Thanks, 🇪🇭🇵🇸🇸🇩 '''<span style="color:red;">East</span><span style="color:black;">ernsa</span><span style="color:green;">hara</span> ↗''' 🇪🇭🇵🇸🇸🇩 06:52, 5 October 2025 (UTC)
::danke (or whatever it is they say in italy) to you three~
::admittedly, some sections... kind of needed humor to work? that entire section in comic sans is only written like that because i couldn't get the meaning across without way too many words or muddling its impact otherwise, for example '''<span style="color:#338665">consarn</span> ↗ <sub><span style="color:#439272">(talck)</span> ↗ <span style="color:#439272">(contirbuton s)</span> ↗</sub>''' 10:03, 5 October 2025 (UTC)
:::Just so you know, Breitbart did an article (can't link it 'cause blacklist) about the Larry situation which mentions you. I figured you would probably want to be aware of that. For what it's worth, I thought your dissection was well-written and quite accurate, and I will note that the author of the piece was previously banned by the community and seemingly holds a grudge against Wikipedia. QuicoleJR (talk) 16:32, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
::::{{tq|"Editor 'consarn' launched into a lengthy tirade filled with deranged mockery, arrogantly claiming Sanger didn't know what 'theses' meant by falsely insisting it referred strictly to academic papers"}}, huh...
::::what can i really say about that, except... hell yeah, i'm notable now, where's my article that only i will be able to edit?
::::really nice of him to acknowledge the superiority of lowercase letters when referring to me, too. i think i like this adler guy
::::jokes aside, i love and hate that it only actually comments on the first paragraph, meaning that whether or not he's actually read it past that point is up for debate. maybe i should ask him '''<span style="color:#338665">consarn</span> ↗ <sub><span style="color:#439272">(talck)</span> ↗ <span style="color:#439272">(contirbuton s)</span> ↗</sub>''' 16:47, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
:::::For those of us coming late to the party, could you provide a link to this masterpiece? Pretty please with a cherry on top? Mr Serjeant Buzfuz (talk) 03:49, 20 February 2026 (UTC)
::::::here '''<span style="color:#338665">consarn</span> ↗ <sub><span style="color:#439272">(talck)</span> ↗ <span style="color:#439272">(contirbuton s)</span> ↗</sub>''' 11:10, 20 February 2026 (UTC)

Unconstructive talk page comments



While I feel like a lot of the non sequiturs ↗ in your talk page comments aren't particularly conducive to the discussion, ones like this ↗ are flat out unconstructive. Please don't bog down discussions with stuff like that. Thanks. <span style="color:green">Sergecross73</span> <span style="color:teal">msg me</span> 19:29, 23 February 2026 (UTC)

:aye '''<span style="color:#338665">consarn</span> ↗ <sub><span style="color:#439272">(talck)</span> ↗ <span style="color:#439272">(contirbuton s)</span> ↗</sub>''' 20:56, 23 February 2026 (UTC)

remember to be wise


it's a new month and the wisdom of the month is now old, outdated wisdom, we need fresh wisdom from the fount of the greatest philosopher named consarn else we will all wither and perish in ignorance anyway yeah '''<span style="color:#a36328">caesar (it/he)</span> ↗ <sub><span style="color:#51915e">(talky place)</span> ↗ <span style="color:#079390">(united bestowals)</span> ↗</sub>''' 22:03, 1 March 2026 (UTC)

:i was busy :( '''<span style="color:#338665">consarn</span> ↗ <sub><span style="color:#439272">(talck)</span> ↗ <span style="color:#439272">(contirbuton s)</span> ↗</sub>''' 18:19, 2 March 2026 (UTC)

Results in article KineMaster ↗ nominated for deletion: restored



Consarn, please check back on my undeletion request at Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion#KineMaster ↗. <span style="color:var(--color-error, red);">'''''Do not re-nominate the article above or else I would get involved in the re-nomination for deletion.'''''</span> &#126;2026-78104-0 ↗ (talk) 01:09, 4 March 2026 (UTC)

:thanks for bringing it to my attention, but i'd actually already noticed the restoration back when it happened... and wound up doing nothing about it because i was asleep 3 minutes after the fact. oops?
:a threat of participating in an afd is not going to actually prevent an afd, especially when no reason has been provided to undelete that wouldn't be better off used to draftify '''<span style="color:#338665">consarn</span> ↗ <sub><span style="color:#439272">(talck)</span> ↗ <span style="color:#439272">(contirbuton s)</span> ↗</sub>''' 01:55, 4 March 2026 (UTC)

Heh



"...a deep misunderstanding of so many facets of reality...". Wow. Well said! David10244 (talk) 04:07, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

The_Daylight_Award


please kindly assist me , i need help to complete the nomination process step 3 and 4 of wikipedia article for deletion process , please is urgent now Samat lib (talk) 13:28, 9 June 2026 (UTC)

:ignoring that contacting some rando for this is strange to say the least, i'll try g6 ↗<nowiki/>ing the whole thing, at which point you should activate twinkle ↗ (accessible from the preferences menu, under "gadgets") and try it again yourself; the options will be there for you '''<span style="color:#338665">consarn</span> ↗ <sub><span style="color:#439272">(talk beige)</span> ↗ <span style="color:#439272">(count ribs)</span> ↗</sub>''' 13:34, 9 June 2026 (UTC)
ok if you cant fix the step 2 and 3 , then stop reverting the article i already nominated for deletionSamat lib (talk) 14:22, 9 June 2026 (UTC)

:it was steps 3 and 4, where you've only done step 2 right, and step 4 doesn't exist. going on with the process as is will result in other people having to deal with a nomination so broken that it will take less effort to start from scratch with a gadget. you don't seem to have read any of the information i've provided, so please try doing that '''<span style="color:#338665">consarn</span> ↗ <sub><span style="color:#439272">(talk beige)</span> ↗ <span style="color:#439272">(count ribs)</span> ↗</sub>''' 14:26, 9 June 2026 (UTC)

Moon Child references



Hi. I have just been editing the draft for ''Moon Child'' ↗ to make it different from the deleted article ↗. I rewrote the sentences from scratch, expanded the infobox and created separate sections for "Development", "Release", "Reception" and "Resurgence". I also added the following references, courtesy of Roberth Martinez (he said, "Those are pretty much all of them talking about ''Moon Child'' in one way or another."):

I also found these references on my own:

In the draft, the ''Amiga Magazine'' and ''Future'' references have quotes from the magazines; ''Amiga Magazines 24-25'' mention that ''Moon Child'' was being made as an unofficial sequel to ''Hoi'', and ''Amiga Future'' mentions Team Hoi's issues with unpaid royalties and the reason for the game's switch from Amiga to Windows. Is this draft okay to submit for review now? Bladerunner09 (talk) 22:00, 21 June 2026 (UTC)

Re: larry



Re this comment ↗: don't take his bait.

And just so you know: I'm not going to defend such clear and obvious trolling. His behavior post-block is simply abhorrent. To say that I am disappointed by this would be an understatement. SuperPianoMan9167 (talk) 14:43, 22 June 2026 (UTC)

:it's more a notice that "threat no good". procedural stuff, really, i'm not sure how he intends on making himself look good with that '''<span style="color:#338665">consarn</span> ↗ <sub><span style="color:#439272">(talk beige)</span> ↗ <span style="color:#439272">(count ribs)</span> ↗</sub>''' 14:44, 22 June 2026 (UTC)

your user page is awesome



I was rummaging through the wikipedia namespace ↗ and i came across your user page, it's silly, it's funny, and it's fun to read &#126;2026-35622-93 ↗ (talk) 19:53, 22 June 2026 (UTC)

:my condolences for bumping into the dark corner of wikipedia '''<span style="color:#338665">consarn</span> ↗ <sub><span style="color:#439272">(talk beige)</span> ↗ <span style="color:#439272">(count ribs)</span> ↗</sub>''' 19:55, 22 June 2026 (UTC)