User Talk: Emiya Mulzomdao

Server-side rendered snapshot of this editor's Wikipedia talk page discussions.

Copyright infringement

30px|left|alt=|link= ↗ I can see that you are a new editor, but you need to know that Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously. You must not copy and paste text from sources you find on the web into articles as you did in the article Fighter's History (video game) ↗. I have removed the infringing text, but the material you copied is subject to copyright, as is almost everything on the web, and when creating or expanding articles, you should completely rewrite the information from the source using your own words. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 13:38, 7 January 2019 (UTC)
: I see the problem. I'll get onto it. --Emiya Mulzomdao (talk) 05:31, 8 January 2019 (UTC)

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

<table class="messagebox " style="border: 1px solid #AAA; background: ivory; padding: 0.5em; width: 100%;">
<tr><td style="vertical-align:middle; padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em;">40px ↗</td><td>Hello! Voting in the '''2019 Arbitration Committee elections ↗''' is now open until 23:59 on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2019|end}}-1 day}}. All '''eligible users ↗''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee ↗ is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process ↗. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans ↗, topic bans ↗, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy ↗ describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates ↗ and submit your choices on the '''2019|poll}}|voting page ↗'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:15, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
</td></tr>
</table>

Re: Natsume split

When splitting the article Natsume Atari ↗, you seem to have accidentally done it backwards. Splitting off Natsume Inc. ↗ preserves none of the former page history. Furthermore, consensus was that the page remain at Natsume (company) ↗, not Natsume Inc. ↗.

As an example, Square (video game company) ↗ is still where it was originally after it was made in 2001, and Square Enix ↗ was made later in 2003. The proper methodology here would have simply been to create a new Natsume Atari page, leaving the older one in the same place. I suggest to reverse the move at WP:RM#T ↗ and change Natsume Inc. ↗ back to the redirect it was, then make a new page for Natsume Atari. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 20:43, 11 August 2023 (UTC)

:I don't quite get what you're saying because the issues with Natsume (company) ↗ aren't quite comparable to Square (video game company) ↗ for numerous factors.
:* The biggest issue with Natsume (company) ↗ was that, as its previous version of page describes them (exerpt from https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Natsume_Atari&oldid=1152431578 05:46, 30 April 2023‎ ↗: ''"Natsume (Japanese: ナツメ) is the name of two video game publishers, Natsume-Atari and Natsume Inc., that were once the same company but are now completely separated."''), this page has been containing information about two company even though they've been two completely different video game develoepers since at least 1995. For some reason, editors in the past never corrected this, which means the page history of Natsume (company) ↗ has accumlated edits about both company with no way to separate them now. Your suggestion sounds like Natsume Inc. ↗ is the one that should inherit the page history from Natsume (company) ↗ and the page Natsume Atari ↗ should start anew, but this doesn't sound right because Natsume Inc. ↗ was established as the US division of Natsume Co., Ltd/Natsume Atari before the former went independent. I think Natsume Atari is the one that should keep the history because it is the "original" one of the two.
:* Another reason I find the comparison to Square (video game company) ↗ not appropriate is because the situations around company are different. Square as an independent developer ceased to exist when it was merged with Enix to become Square Enix. It makes sense there are two separate pages about Square (video game company) ↗ and Square Enix ↗ because they cover different eras of the history (Square: 1986–2003; Square Enix: 2003–present). On the other hand, Natsume Co., Ltd never went away like it. It was founded in 1987 and still operates the business today. It changed its name to "Natsume Atari" in 2013, but Atari (unrelated to the American company of the same name) was Natsume's pachislot subsidiary, so it wasn't a merger between two separate corporations like Square and Enix. This is why I moved Natsume (company) ↗ to Natsume Atari ↗ because they're the same company.
:Emiya Mulzomdao (talk) 01:53, 12 August 2023 (UTC)
::Ok, fair, I didn't check indepth enough to see that Natsume Co. and Natsume Inc. were separate companies. This makes sense, then. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 02:39, 12 August 2023 (UTC)

Natsume Inc. ↗

I've marked that article as reviewed. Thanks for splitting those two pages. Deauthorized. <sup>(talk ↗)</sup> 00:31, 4 October 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

<div class="ivmbox " style="margin-bottom: 1em; border: 1px solid #AAA; background-color: ivory; padding: 0.5em; display: flex; align-items: center; ">
<div class="ivmbox-image" style="padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em; flex: 1 0 40px; max-width: 100px">40px ↗</div>
<div class="ivmbox-text">
Hello! Voting in the '''2023 Arbitration Committee elections ↗''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2023|end}}-1 day}}. All '''eligible users ↗''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee ↗ is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process ↗. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans ↗, topic bans ↗, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy ↗ describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates ↗ and submit your choices on the '''2023|poll}}|voting page ↗'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. <small>MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:41, 28 November 2023 (UTC)</small>

</div>
</div>

now hold on a minute

mostly a matter of curiosity so i don't plunge myself into a rabbit hole alone

about this edit ↗ on presumably former tommy tallarico studios ceo tommy tallarico, and the accompanying edit ↗ on tomorrow never dies, who even ''is'' this todd dennis? i went and looked around, and found nothing on. the credits i found seem to list sonic "david alexander" mayhem and howard ulyate as composers (mostly howard), and daryl kimoto, john botti, david whittaker, bill lusty, and a mysterious individual going by the name "joey kuras" as the people in charge of all the other sounds, but i found nothing on todd working on it specfically

did find a credit in the 3do port of wolfenstein 3d though, so at least he's real

is he in the credits of the game but just never mentioned anywhere else as having worked on it? '''<span style="color:#8a440a">cogsan</span> <sub><span style="color:#8a440a">(nag me)</span> <span style="color:#8a440a">(stalk me)</span> ↗</sub>''' 11:44, 4 March 2024 (UTC)

:Todd Dennis is listed as the composer in the booklet of official soundtrack, ''Tomorrow Never Dies (Video Game Original Soundtrack)''. Here's a photo of said booklet. ↗ Todd Dennis is credited on many other games that involved Tommy Tallarico Studios, famously ''Black Dawn'' whose music was recycled in ''Sonic and the Black Knight'', so this information checks out. Emiya Mulzomdao (talk) 14:09, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
::oh, thanks
::not sure why he's not mentioned elsewhere, when even joey is '''<span style="color:#8a440a">cogsan</span> <sub><span style="color:#8a440a">(nag me)</span> <span style="color:#8a440a">(stalk me)</span> ↗</sub>''' 14:16, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
:::This game appears to lack end credits and only has them in the manual. Even there, the music is credited to Tommy Tallarico Studios with no specific composer names. They're only listed in the official soundtrack and it seems like nobody bothered to check. Emiya Mulzomdao (talk) 14:31, 4 March 2024 (UTC)

Your view would be appreciated here

Talk:List of marines and naval infantry forces#Suggest renaming this article ↗ What do you think? Dreddmoto (talk) 17:07, 29 March 2024 (UTC)

:I'm not familiar with the topic enough to provide opinion. Emiya Mulzomdao (talk) 02:21, 30 March 2024 (UTC)

CS1 error on Street Fighter: The Movie (console video game) ↗

25px|alt=|link= ↗ Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have '''automatically detected''' that this edit ↗ performed by you, on the page :Street Fighter: The Movie (console video game) ↗, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A bare URL ↗ error. References show this error when one of the URL-containing parameters cannot be paired with an associated title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. ([//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Street_Fighter:_The_Movie_(console_video_game)&action=edit&minor=minor&summary=Fixing+reference+error+raised+by+%5B%5BUser%3AQwerfjkl%20(bot)%7CQwerfjkl%20(bot)%5D%5D Fix] | [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&preload=User:Qwerfjkl%20(bot)/helpform&preloadtitle=Referencing%20errors%20on%20%5B%5BSpecial%3ADiff%2F1216527059%7CStreet%20Fighter:%20The%20Movie%20(console%20video%20game)%5D%5D Ask for help])

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive ↗, you can [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:Qwerfjkl/Botpreload&editintro=User:Qwerfjkl/boteditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:Qwerfjkl&preloadtitle=Qwerfjkl%20(bot)%20–%20Emiya_Mulzomdao&section=new&preloadparams%5b%5d={{FULLPAGENAMEE:Street Fighter: The Movie (console video game)}}&preloadparams%5b%5d=1216527059 report it to my operator].
Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 14:59, 31 March 2024 (UTC)

Discussion at Talk:Cha Eun-woo § Listing of "model" as a profession ↗

25px|link=|alt= ↗ You are invited to join the discussion at Talk:Cha Eun-woo § Listing of "model" as a profession ↗. '''<span style="color:#f535aa">—</span> <span style="background:#f535aa;color:#fff;padding:2px;border-radius:5px">Paper9oll</span> <span style="color:#f535aa">(🔔 • 📝 ↗)</span>''' 07:12, 11 July 2024 (UTC)

Unreliable source

Thank you for noticing and removing the use of the 'Niche Gamer' unreliable source on Chiitan ↗. When I in-lined all the citations on that article yesterday I didn't realize that site was listed as such. There were some more instances of it on the page, I deleted the rest. –'''<span style="color:black">Erakura</span>'''<sup><span style="color:darkgreen">(talk)</span></sup> 13:22, 14 July 2024 (UTC)

:Yeah, I missed the other citations and it's good you caught and fixed them. Emiya Mulzomdao (talk) 12:03, 16 July 2024 (UTC)

Your edit/vandalism was reverted

1. You claimed FemiWiki is an open-wiki, thus is against WP:UGC.

Re 1: This is a false claim. FemiWiki is not an open-wiki.

2. You claimed the article linked is an original thought, thus is against WP:NOR.

Re 2. This is a false claim. This is a primary source (made by the creators of 4B themselves) and is allowed via WP:PRIMARY.

From point 1 of WP:PRIMARY: "Primary sources that have been reputably published may be used in Wikipedia, but only with care, because it is easy to misuse them". The FemiWiki source has been reputably published by various academic and peer-reviewed journals. 5 of the existing 32 sources from the 4B Wikipedia page refer to this FemiWiki source, but here is another academic journal that verified and refers to FemiWiki: 6B4T in China: a case of Inter-Asian feminist knowledge negotiation and contestation through translation ↗.

3. You claimed that "the claim does not line up at all with what's in this source"

Re 3. There was never a claim made. Only a copy+paste directly from the source was done. This is allowed by point 3 of WP:PRIMARY. '''Given that your meta-claim (your claim about how the FemiWiki source was used) was verifiably and grossly wrong, I have reason to believe your edit was not made in good faith and is therefore an instance of WP:VANDAL.'''

Please fully read and understand the Wikipedia policies (not just selectively read and stop reading whenever you get the bits of policies that you were looking for) so that you don't incorrectly label a source as being against some policy.

Please learn more about 4B if you want to continue contributing to the 4B page. 99.159.19.180 ↗ (talk) 18:21, 24 August 2024 (UTC)

:Primary sources still have to be reliable and Femwiki isn't a reliable source. You claim it isn't user generated content, then I assume you can provide the credentials of Leaf1234 who recently edited the article there. Have they been independently published by another reliable source that considers them a subject matter expert, as per WP:SPS ↗?
:I'll warn you again that falsely accusing other editors of vandalism is considered against WP:NPA ↗. Read WP:NOTVANDALISM ↗ and stop. -- <small>LCU</small> '''A<small>ctively</small>D<small>isinterested</small>''' <small>''«@» °∆t ↗°''</small> 18:55, 25 August 2024 (UTC)

Good but

Re this ↗. All good, you are correct and it is great you explain this in a detailed edit summary, but don't mark edits like this as minor. Just a heads up. <sub style="border:1px solid #228B22;padding:1px;">Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus|<span style="color:#7CFC00;background:#006400;"> reply here</span></sub> 06:26, 6 October 2024 (UTC)

:I'll keep this in mind next time. Emiya Mulzomdao (talk) 07:27, 6 October 2024 (UTC)

November 2024

25px|alt=Information icon ↗ Hello, I'm Arjayay. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, :Marc Benioff ↗, but you didn't provide a reliable source ↗. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation ↗ and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners ↗. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. CelebrityNetWorth is NOT a reliable source ↗ as per WP:RSP ↗  - Arjayay (talk) 12:06, 3 November 2024 (UTC)

:{{reply to|Arjayay}} I didn't add that. I actually cleaned up the other unrelated wiki link because of WP:UGC ↗. I don't know why the history page appears like that, but it wasn't me that added CelebrityNetWorth. Emiya Mulzomdao (talk) 13:31, 3 November 2024 (UTC)

::I suspect that as part of your revert you reinstated part of an earlier edit that included it - best wishes - Arjayay (talk) 14:01, 3 November 2024 (UTC)

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

<div class="ivmbox " style="margin-bottom: 1em; border: 1px solid #a2a9b1; background-color: #fdf2d5; padding: 0.5em; display: flex; align-items: center; ">
<div class="ivmbox-image noresize" style="padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em;">40px ↗</div>
<div class="ivmbox-text">
Hello! Voting in the '''2024 Arbitration Committee elections ↗''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2024|end}}-1 day}}. All '''eligible users ↗''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee ↗ is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process ↗. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans ↗, topic bans ↗, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy ↗ describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates ↗ and submit your choices on the '''2024|poll}}|voting page ↗'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. <small>MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:30, 19 November 2024 (UTC)</small>

</div>
</div>

The Dong-A Ilbo reliability

I think we should reexamine The Dong-A Ilbo btw. If you give me a few weeks I can initiate the discussion with my own research but just putting on your radar.

Thanks for all the work you've been doing on the RS list btw :) seefooddiet (talk) 19:58, 13 December 2024 (UTC)

:I'll look up what I can, although I'll focus on the main body because Dong-A media is too huge a group to determine everything under a single rating. Emiya Mulzomdao (talk) 03:19, 14 December 2024 (UTC)
::Agreed, I think we're better off individually classifying publications anyway. Parent companies often offer different flavors of publications. seefooddiet (talk) 05:22, 14 December 2024 (UTC)
<!--

":Naver Enter ↗" listed at Redirects for discussion ↗

30px ↗
The redirect <span class="plainlinks">[//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Naver_Enter&redirect=no Naver Enter]</span> has been listed at redirects for discussion ↗ to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines ↗. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at '''{{section link|1=Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 January 25#Naver Enter}}''' until a consensus is reached.

Disagree with removal of comments by Amanda Overton on LGBTQ themes in Western animation ↗ page

You removed content from that page, saying it violates WP:RSPREDDIT ↗, and "borders on original search" (I think you meant "borders on original research"). As I said in my edit, Overton is a key writer for the series. I'm not always the biggest fan of citing Reddit myself, but I will do it if that's the only place the information can be found and it is someone important to a show. I'm not going to cite some random fan analysis. For those reading the article, it is important to add information coming from one of the show writers. I would ''strongly'' suggest, that if you are having an issue with citing Reddit there, that ''you'' try to find citations to that information, in reliable sources, elsewhere, as I did ↗ with one of sections citing Reddit, since you initiated the removal. Thanks. Historyday01 (talk) 12:39, 7 April 2025 (UTC)

:{{reply to|Historyday01|p=,}} Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information. If you can only find the information in someone's reply to a user-generated post (not from r/IAmA), then it's not important enough to include in the article in the first place. Doesn't matter if it's from the show's writer. This is before going through that the discussion on WP:RSPREDDIT ↗ is that editors disagree on their reliability as a primary source.
:Also, you say I should seek information myself for removing the citations. That is not how Wikipedia works. The burden is on the editor who adds or restores material. See WP:BURDEN ↗. Since you added the article from ''The Gamer'' in the meantime, why not try to write around it instead? Emiya Mulzomdao (talk) 11:50, 8 April 2025 (UTC)
::I expected a response like that from you. I don't have unlimited time to write on Wikipedia and I don't appreciate comments like yours, which devalue the work other people have put into articles. Your tone is dismissive, nasty, and unwelcome. Historyday01 (talk) 12:02, 8 April 2025 (UTC)
:::I can ask a third opinion at noticeboards if that's what you want. Emiya Mulzomdao (talk) 12:15, 8 April 2025 (UTC)
::::Not necessary. I will say that ''if'' I do have time, I will look at it again, but it is not a top priority for me right now. I'd like to fix up some other pages first which are much more in need, then get back to that one. Historyday01 (talk) 12:30, 8 April 2025 (UTC)

Some stroopwafels for you!

{| style="background-color: var(--background-color-success-subtle, #fdffe7); border: 1px solid var(--border-color-success, #fceb92); color: var(--color-base, #202122);"
|style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 5px;" | 135px ↗
|style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;" | I read the latest discussion on your page and I think your tone was simply factual and straightforward - and you did not strike back when you were accused. So you really deserve some nice stroopwafels! Lova Falk (talk) 12:43, 9 April 2025 (UTC)
|}

May 2025

you do realize that it ↗ was Netflix TV show, right? 2600:8801:8E:9900:7DD4:26B7:D5A7:6A85 ↗ (talk) 16:22, 11 May 2025 (UTC)

:That website was frequently discussed as an unreliable churnalism content farm. Video game wikiproject is just one of the many. Emiya Mulzomdao (talk) 11:07, 13 May 2025 (UTC)

User generated

Posting a scan of a brochure is not user generated content. We post links to things hosted by others all of the time. <span style="background:#ff0000;font-family:Times New Roman;"><span style="color:#FDEE00;">''' Mr.choppers | '''</span><span style="color:#FDEE00;">✎ </span></span> 14:06, 15 July 2025 (UTC)

:Those blogs are run by persons who have no connection to the vehicle's manufacturer, and they're not properly scanned. It's not very helpful. I can't read half of what the fine print says in this one ↗. Either way, articles should not rely on WP:UGC ↗ too much. Emiya Mulzomdao (talk) 11:28, 16 July 2025 (UTC)

Template:Better source needed

Hey, thanks for your work on cleaning up unreliable sources.

I just wanted to point out that leaving an unreliable source in place and tagging it with <nowiki>{{better source needed}}</nowiki> ↗ may be a more appropriate action in some situations, instead of removing the citation entirely and leaving the statements fully unsourced. An unreliable source is better than no source at all, and that's what the <nowiki>{{better source needed}}</nowiki> ↗ tag is meant for.

Just a thought. RachelTensions (talk) 01:49, 30 August 2025 (UTC)

:I can see where you're coming from, but a lot of articles I touch are BLP in which case they should be removed instantly. I'll consider Template:Better source needed ↗ whenever applicable. Emiya Mulzomdao (talk) 01:57, 30 August 2025 (UTC)
::In the case of a BLP, the whole statement should be removed if it's contentious material, not just the citation. RachelTensions (talk) 02:33, 30 August 2025 (UTC)
:::I'll do that from now on. Emiya Mulzomdao (talk) 03:20, 30 August 2025 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 23

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of unofficial Mario media ↗, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Luigi ↗. Such links are usually incorrect ↗, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. <small>(Read the FAQ{{*}} Join us at the DPL WikiProject ↗.)</small>

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 20:00, 23 September 2025 (UTC)

Introduction to contentious topics

{{ivmbox | image = Commons-emblem-notice.svg |imagesize=50px | bg = #E5F8FF | text = You have recently edited a page related to '''gender-related disputes or controversies or people associated with them''', a topic designated as '''''contentious ↗'''''. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and <em>does <strong>not</strong> imply that there are any issues with your editing</em>.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as ''contentious topics''. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee ↗. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia's norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators ↗ have an expanded level of powers and discretion in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit <strong>carefully and constructively</strong>, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia ↗;

comply with all applicable policies and guidelines ↗;

follow editorial and behavioural best practices;

comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and

refrain from gaming the system ↗.

<p>Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics ''procedures'', you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard ↗ or you may learn more about this contentious topic here ↗. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{tl|Ctopics/aware}} template. <span style="opacity:.95;border:1px outset #6ED;border-radius:30% 0;background:linear-gradient(225deg,#16C,#6ED);color:#fff;padding:2px 5px"><b>tony</b></span> 15:46, 1 October 2025 (UTC)</p>}}

Question

Heyhi! Congrats on your 5,000th edit! I have just discovered your work on reliable sources and I think it's very valuable. I'm definitely not as good as you are at making those verdicts. That's why I have come to ask if you would like to evaluate the Deadmau5 ↗ article I am working on. I'm at a point with it where I'm not sure what to do to it. But if you can gut its poor sources that'd give me some more work I'd be really happy to return on. Thank you! You are welcome to refuse :) 12:18, 31 October 2025 (UTC) Viva la horde, ~ GoatLordServant ↗<sup>(Talk)</sup> 12:18, 31 October 2025 (UTC)

:Hello. While I appreciate your commendation, I'm not too familiar with music-related sources. This is not to say I won't scan the article, but I think you could start by cross-examining the sources with the lists below.
:* Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Perennial sources ↗ for general purpose
:* Wikipedia:WikiProject Albums/Sources ↗ for musical topics
:Emiya Mulzomdao (talk) 12:28, 31 October 2025 (UTC)

Finger edit

The recent edit is also fairly minor and risks dragging this on. I don't recommend doing this unless you'd like to argue with that user over and over for eternity. I can explain all my changes, I don't agree with the ones you made. Recommend you reconsider this, helps basically nobody and hurts me who's caught in the middle grapesurgeon (talk) 13:53, 31 October 2025 (UTC)

:I also do not want to interact with Someone123454321, who frankly should have been sanctioned already for this IDHT behavior and personal attack ↗. I'm doing the article review as I often do. Do you want me to cease that? Emiya Mulzomdao (talk) 14:33, 31 October 2025 (UTC)
::I'm asking you to be strategic about your time. If you don't want to argue and you know this conflict isn't very important and that that user will argue about unimportant stuff ad infinitum, is this a really good use of all of our time? grapesurgeon (talk) 14:37, 31 October 2025 (UTC)
:::I'll drop this for now since you have helped me before and I put trust in you, but it should be clear whatever stunt they're pulling off is neither normal nor concensus-building. That shouldn't be treated lightly. Emiya Mulzomdao (talk) 14:46, 31 October 2025 (UTC)

Temporary account IP viewer granted

right|80px|alt=The temporary account IP viewer logo, composed of the Wikipedia globe with a user and an IP address ↗
Hello, Emiya Mulzomdao. Per your request, your account has been <span class="plainlinks">granted ↗</span> {{mono|temporary-account-viewer}} rights. You are now able to reveal the IP addresses of individuals using temporary accounts ↗ that are not visible to the general public. This is very sensitive information that is <strong>only</strong> to be used to aid in anti-abuse workflows. Please take a moment to review Wikipedia:Temporary account IP viewer ↗ for more information on this user right. It is important to remember:

You must not share IP address data with someone who does not have the same access permissions unless disclosure is permissible as per guidelines listed at Foundation:Policy:Wikimedia Access to Temporary Account IP Addresses Policy ↗.

Access <strong>must not</strong> be used for political control, to apply pressure on editors, or as a threat against another editor in a content dispute. There must be a valid reason to investigate a temporary user. Note that using multiple temporary accounts is not forbidden, so long as they are not used in violation of policies (for example, block or ban evasion).

It is also important to note that the following actions are logged for others to see:

When a user accepts the preference that enables or disables IP reveal for their account.

Revealing an IP address of a temporary account.

Listing the temporary accounts that are associated with one or more IP address ↗es (using the CIDR notation ↗ format).

Remember, even if a user is violating policy, avoid revealing personal information if possible. Use temporary account usernames rather than disclosing IP addresses directly, or give information such as same network/not same network or similar. If you do not want the user right anymore then please ask me or another administrator and it will be removed for you. You may also voluntarily give up access at any time by visiting Special:Preferences ↗. Happy editing! —Femke 🐦 (talk) 17:10, 10 November 2025 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 13

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Mafia City ↗, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Android ↗.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 22:14, 13 November 2025 (UTC)

ArbCom 2025 Elections voter message

<div class="ivmbox " style="margin-bottom: 1em; border: 1px solid #a2a9b1; background-color: #fdf2d5; padding: 0.5em; display: flex; align-items: center; ">
<div class="ivmbox-image" style="padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em;flex-basis: 40px">40px ↗</div>
<div class="ivmbox-text">
Hello! Voting in the '''2025 Arbitration Committee elections ↗''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2025|end}}-1 day}}. All '''eligible users ↗''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee ↗ is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process ↗. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans ↗, topic bans ↗, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy ↗ describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please review the candidates ↗ and submit your choices on the '''2025|poll}}|voting page ↗'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. <small>MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:36, 18 November 2025 (UTC)</small>

</div>
</div>

Nomination for merger of Template:DonPachi series ↗

25px|alt=Information icon ↗ Template:DonPachi series ↗ has been nominated for merging ↗ with Template:CAVE games ↗. You are invited to comment on the discussion at '''the template's entry''' ↗ on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Jotamide (talk) 21:26, 11 December 2025 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi Emiya Mulzomdao. Thank you for your work on Mado Monogatari: Fia and the Wondrous Academy ↗. Another editor, Miminity, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol ↗ and left the following comment:

{{Bq|1=I just reviewed this article you created. Great Job!! I suggest submitting/nominating a simple "fun fact"/"trivia" about the subject of this article to WP:DYK ↗. You can use this guide to proceed. {{ifnotempty|Also try adding some review in the reception from the listed review scores in the bottom|Also try adding some review in the reception from the listed review scores in the bottom. Keep up the good work and Happy Editing!!|Keep up the good work and Happy Editing!!}}}}

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{code|<nowiki>{{Re|</nowiki>Miminity<nowiki>}}</nowiki>}}. <small>(Message delivered via the Page Curation ↗ tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)</small>

'''''Warm Regards''''', Miminity (Talk?) (me contribs ↗) 11:39, 8 February 2026 (UTC)

ANI case

Hey, as a heads up imo the ANI cases you've filed for the Someone user thus far have not been worded in a way that can result in a block. Thus far the evidence you've provided doesn't clearly show blockable behavior, when I think several things they've done are clearer in that direction.

The initial message is pretty important for these; sets the tone. If it's not clear enough, and if it's lengthy, people will not want to participate.

I'm going to observe how this one goes. If it fails, I'll file another one in future, with what I think will be clearer wording. Just a heads up to please hold off on filing on the Someone user in near future, except for if you get something clearly blockable. grapesurgeon (talk) 01:09, 11 February 2026 (UTC)

:I didn't look for a block, but did mention TBAN, which I think is enough solution for this situation. Emiya Mulzomdao (talk) 12:15, 11 February 2026 (UTC)
::I don't even think the current presentation may be enough for that grapesurgeon (talk) 14:08, 11 February 2026 (UTC)
:::That's unfortunate to hear, but I'll get by for how it goes. Emiya Mulzomdao (talk) 12:16, 14 February 2026 (UTC)
::::Again in future I'd like to file. First post very important. grapesurgeon (talk) 14:27, 14 February 2026 (UTC)
:::::Sure, go ahead. Emiya Mulzomdao (talk) 14:08, 15 February 2026 (UTC)
:::::Whew, looks like I was wrong. Happy to have been wrong. grapesurgeon (talk) 13:53, 23 February 2026 (UTC)
::::::Honestly this whole fiasco should have never happened. But everyone can move on now. Emiya Mulzomdao (talk) 11:38, 25 February 2026 (UTC)
:Suspect they're LOUTSOCKing again, I'll file an SPI grapesurgeon (talk) 12:33, 7 March 2026 (UTC)

Sunjae ↗

I see that you removed the extlink to Namuwiki from this page, commenting that it's libelous. Were you referring to the specific page, or to Namuwiki in general? I didn't see anything concerning on the extlink, and my understanding is that Namuwiki is the most popular Korean-language wiki. Is there a consensus to ban links to the wiki? pburka (talk) 12:19, 5 April 2026 (UTC)

:Open wikis are generally avoided for external link section (WP:LINKSTOAVOID ↗). In this case, I've cut the link because of WP:BLP ↗ since the website is known for publishing explicitly libelous materials. Emiya Mulzomdao (talk) 12:25, 5 April 2026 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 9

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Media Today ↗, a link pointing to the disambiguation page Union ↗ was added.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 18:05, 9 April 2026 (UTC)

CS1 error on Spyro ↗

25px|alt=|link= ↗ Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have '''automatically detected''' that this edit ↗ performed by you, on the page :Spyro ↗, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A generic name ↗ error. References show this error when author or editor name parameters use place-holder names. Please edit the article to include the source's actual author or editor name. ([//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Spyro&action=edit&minor=minor&summary=Fixing+reference+error+raised+by+%5B%5BUser%3AQwerfjkl%20(bot)%7CQwerfjkl%20(bot)%5D%5D Fix] | [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&preload=User:Qwerfjkl%20(bot)/helpform&preloadtitle=Referencing%20errors%20on%20%5B%5BSpecial%3ADiff%2F1351186304%7CSpyro%5D%5D Ask for help])

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive ↗, you can [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:Qwerfjkl/Botpreload&editintro=User:Qwerfjkl/Boteditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:Qwerfjkl&preloadtitle=Qwerfjkl%20(bot)%20–%20Emiya_Mulzomdao&section=new&preloadparams%5b%5d={{FULLPAGENAMEE:Spyro}}&preloadparams%5b%5d=1351186304 report it to my operator].
Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 13:53, 26 April 2026 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 26

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Crimson Desert ↗, a link pointing to the disambiguation page Black Desert ↗ was added.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 18:00, 26 April 2026 (UTC)

CS1 error on I Am Jesus Christ ↗

25px|alt=|link= ↗ Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have '''automatically detected''' that this edit ↗ performed by you, on the page :I Am Jesus Christ ↗, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A generic name ↗ error. References show this error when author or editor name parameters use place-holder names. Please edit the article to include the source's actual author or editor name. ([//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=I_Am_Jesus_Christ&action=edit&minor=minor&summary=Fixing+reference+error+raised+by+%5B%5BUser%3AQwerfjkl%20(bot)%7CQwerfjkl%20(bot)%5D%5D Fix] | [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&preload=User:Qwerfjkl%20(bot)/helpform&preloadtitle=Referencing%20errors%20on%20%5B%5BSpecial%3ADiff%2F1357424614%7CI%20Am%20Jesus%20Christ%5D%5D Ask for help])

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive ↗, you can [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:Qwerfjkl/Botpreload&editintro=User:Qwerfjkl/Boteditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:Qwerfjkl&preloadtitle=Qwerfjkl%20(bot)%20–%20Emiya_Mulzomdao&section=new&preloadparams%5b%5d={{FULLPAGENAMEE:I Am Jesus Christ}}&preloadparams%5b%5d=1357424614 report it to my operator].
Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 15:40, 2 June 2026 (UTC)

CS1 error on Crazy Arcade ↗

25px|alt=|link= ↗ Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have '''automatically detected''' that this edit ↗ performed by you, on the page :Crazy Arcade ↗, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A URL ↗ error. References show this error when one of the URL-containing parameters contains an invalid URL. Please edit the article to add the valid URL. ([//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Crazy_Arcade&action=edit&minor=minor&summary=Fixing+reference+error+raised+by+%5B%5BUser%3AQwerfjkl%20(bot)%7CQwerfjkl%20(bot)%5D%5D Fix] | [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&preload=User:Qwerfjkl%20(bot)/helpform&preloadtitle=Referencing%20errors%20on%20%5B%5BSpecial%3ADiff%2F1359459894%7CCrazy%20Arcade%5D%5D Ask for help])

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive ↗, you can [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:Qwerfjkl/Botpreload&editintro=User:Qwerfjkl/Boteditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:Qwerfjkl&preloadtitle=Qwerfjkl%20(bot)%20–%20Emiya_Mulzomdao&section=new&preloadparams%5b%5d={{FULLPAGENAMEE:Crazy Arcade}}&preloadparams%5b%5d=1359459894 report it to my operator].
Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 12:16, 15 June 2026 (UTC)

CS1 error on Playism ↗

25px|alt=|link= ↗ Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have '''automatically detected''' that this edit ↗ performed by you, on the page :Playism ↗, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A URL ↗ error. References show this error when one of the URL-containing parameters contains an invalid URL. Please edit the article to add the valid URL. ([//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Playism&action=edit&minor=minor&summary=Fixing+reference+error+raised+by+%5B%5BUser%3AQwerfjkl%20(bot)%7CQwerfjkl%20(bot)%5D%5D Fix] | [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&preload=User:Qwerfjkl%20(bot)/helpform&preloadtitle=Referencing%20errors%20on%20%5B%5BSpecial%3ADiff%2F1360365615%7CPlayism%5D%5D Ask for help])

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive ↗, you can [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:Qwerfjkl/Botpreload&editintro=User:Qwerfjkl/Boteditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:Qwerfjkl&preloadtitle=Qwerfjkl%20(bot)%20–%20Emiya_Mulzomdao&section=new&preloadparams%5b%5d={{FULLPAGENAMEE:Playism}}&preloadparams%5b%5d=1360365615 report it to my operator].
Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 01:33, 21 June 2026 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: :Park Jeong-tae ↗

Hello Emiya Mulzomdao, and thanks for patrolling new pages! I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of :Park Jeong-tae ↗, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: The article makes a credible assertion of importance or significance, sufficient to pass A7. You may wish to review the WP:CSD{{!}}Criteria for Speedy Deletion ↗ before tagging further pages. Thank you. <span style="color: purple">CoconutOctopus</span> <span style="color: DarkOrchid">talk</span> 12:26, 27 June 2026 (UTC)

I don't think you'll recognise me at first but I'm the guy who liked your work on RPG Maker/Wolf RPG Editor pages here.

I have an account now. Smileghozt (talk) 19:46, 29 June 2026 (UTC)

:Welcome to Wikipedia. I do remember. Help:Introduction ↗ is a good tutorial to get familiar with the site, but you don't have to learn everything at once. It's kind of a thing that you will learn as you go. If you have specific questions, it's a great idea to frequent Wikipedia:Teahouse ↗, where seasoned editors will generally come in quickly and help out. Emiya Mulzomdao (talk) 11:33, 30 June 2026 (UTC)
::Idk if you would be interested but I have a page in draft form I was working on. Smileghozt (talk) 12:21, 30 June 2026 (UTC)
:::https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Smileghozt/sandbox i have this too Smileghozt (talk) 18:45, 30 June 2026 (UTC)
::::I'm not very good at reviewing drafts, though I would say your recently accepted Middens is a good start. I really recommend visiting Teahouse for draft feedback. People there would be much more helpful than I can ever be.
::::Sandbox shows a lot of games only have a small number of references to make an article, but there are still ways to put them on Wikipedia somewhere. Scouting Template:Video games released by year ↗ is a great place to start. You only need one good reference (see WP:SECONDARY ↗) to add things there. Emiya Mulzomdao (talk) 11:59, 1 July 2026 (UTC)
:::::idk if you know much about middens, i played it like a week ago. its hard to really describe the game honestly because of how weird and abstract it is.
:::::i just have these references in case a page on these games might be made. middens already has a page so i dont need to put a reference for it on the list of games pages. Smileghozt (talk) 13:01, 1 July 2026 (UTC)
::::::also do you think this site is reliable? http://gekikarareview.com Smileghozt (talk) 01:45, 3 July 2026 (UTC)
:::::::It looks like a website accepting user reviews according to this ↗, so I would say no. See WP:USERGENERATED ↗. You should check out Category:WikiProject lists of reliable sources ↗ for frequently discussed materials. Emiya Mulzomdao (talk) 14:42, 3 July 2026 (UTC)
::::::::I mean there are some reviews are done by administrators. Smileghozt (talk) 15:52, 3 July 2026 (UTC)
:::::::::The host seems like amateur reviewers with no ties to conventional journalism, meaning it is likely unreliable. Emiya Mulzomdao (talk) 10:10, 4 July 2026 (UTC)
::::::::::Is Mogura Games reliable? I don't think its on the list of reliable sources in English at least.
::::::::::Indie Statik isn't as well, but I think it is reliable because at least 2 of the authors have worked for reliable sources like Kill Screen and IGN. Smileghozt (talk) 12:36, 4 July 2026 (UTC)
:::::::::::You might get better answers by asking at WP:V/N ↗ Emiya Mulzomdao (talk) 02:39, 5 July 2026 (UTC)

What do you think of the sources I have rn on my sandbox?

im 100% sure alicemare and noel the mortal fate meet notability criteria at this point, lieat, cloe's requiem and forest of drizzling rain probably, dreaming mary, stray cat crossing, strange men series, one-way heroics (i think there's way more sources out there but i dont feel bothered to get them as soon as possible) and gingiva maybe. everything else i dont really think so or i just doubt. Smileghozt (talk) 02:49, 6 July 2026 (UTC)

:Alicemare and Noel the Mortal Fate do look sound since you have a few reviews from reliable sources like Siliconera, RPGFan, and Hardcore Gamer. On the other hand, those "Top X list" coverage from GameRant would be interpreted as trivial mentions ↗, which technically can be cited but are not much helpful.
:I recommend adding these games to list articles first, since they only require one good secondary reference. Check out this edit of mine ↗ as an example, adding Steam rerelease of Alicemare using the Siliconera article. Emiya Mulzomdao (talk) 09:39, 6 July 2026 (UTC)
::I mean I hesitated doing stuff like that because I prefer posting them using the original date of release of the games, not the remakes or console releases.
::Also I wonder if it would actually be possible if the Wadanohara page could be recreated, if only because of the decent amount of sources about the manga (and the interview with the dev and Valnet providing some additional context about the game). I mean I feel some doubt about it but there's 4 sources who discussed it I know of, Natalie, Mogura Games, Anime News Network and Crunchyroll ↗ (gotta love the "Mogeko's magical all-ages adventure" comment, kids would better off with the Ao Oni manga) Smileghozt (talk) 13:10, 6 July 2026 (UTC)
:::Unfortunately there aren't a lot of reliable news media that cover RPG Maker or similar RPG engine games. It's quite difficult to write about individual games unless it's something like Lisa or Omori. Perhaps there could be a list article that hosts RPG Maker games. Emiya Mulzomdao (talk) 13:46, 8 July 2026 (UTC)
::::I think the reason why not many people cover them in the west is because a lot of them are either freeware (they get mentioned more if they're commercial), too obscure or too niche to bring up or just because most of them aren't in English and of all the ones translated its mostly just the big names in Japan. Of all the Japanese ones that have a page on Wikipedia as of now, Pert-em-Hru, Palette, Moon Whistle and The Aquarium Does Not Dance are the only ones that weren't either a part of the western horror game craze at the beginning of the 2010s, have large western fanbases, had anime adaptations or are just massive franchises in general.
::::There's a lot more coverage in Japan because these sorts of games were a big craze, anyone could make some horror game in weeks and you could make an entire franchise off of it long before us westerners saw Five Night's at Freddy's come along, Corpse Party, Ao Oni, Death Forest and Angels of Death are the most obvious cases (there's FIVE Death Forest films), but you also have things like the Identity V Ib collab (which I only heard of a day ago), Ib and Cloe's Requiem (at ''least'') getting cafés and Underworld Capital Incident getting a stage play.
::::And yeah I had that same list idea before. Smileghozt (talk) 17:45, 8 July 2026 (UTC)
:::::This conversation inspired me to make a draft. Feels like this should have been done ages ago.
:::::Draft:List of RPG Maker games ↗
:::::You can add games here, but it's important each game must have a secondary reference written by reliable news outlets. Otherwise we'll have a flood of obscure games self-sourcing their itch.io pages and quality control would be non-existent. More can be learned at Wikipedia:Stand-alone lists ↗. Emiya Mulzomdao (talk) 10:33, 9 July 2026 (UTC)
::::::I've always never liked when people try to shoehorn their special interests like that, know what I mean? Smileghozt (talk) 01:24, 10 July 2026 (UTC)
:::::::It's common people contribute to topics they have particular interest in, and Wikipedia's goal is to guide and refine their efforts toward beneficial. Emiya Mulzomdao (talk) 11:18, 10 July 2026 (UTC)
::::::::I mean like when they do it regardless of Wikipedia's guidelines, regardless of sources that are reliable or not. Smileghozt (talk) 15:26, 10 July 2026 (UTC)
:::::::::To be honest guidelines can be intimidating given how vast and intricate they are. It is of assistance for Wikipedia to assume good faith first ↗ and help out people. Emiya Mulzomdao (talk) 05:20, 11 July 2026 (UTC)