User Talk: LilianaUwU

Server-side rendered snapshot of this editor's Wikipedia talk page discussions.

{{DISPLAYTITLE:User talk:''LilianaUwU''}}
{{pp|harassment|small=yes}}
{{User:LilianaUwU/pretty stripe uwu}}
{{Talk header}}
{{Contentious topics/aware|gg|e-e|9/11|tpm|blp|covid|ps|aa2|acu|ab|gc|horn}}
{{archives|auto=long}}
'''Please reply on your talk page if you're not extended confirmed and need to reply to my messages.'''

category line so it doesn't disappear

Category:Wikipedians with red-linked categories on their user talk page ↗

Transgender healthcare and people ↗ arbitration case opened

You recently offered a statement in a request for arbitration. The Arbitration Committee has accepted that request for arbitration and an arbitration case has been opened at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Transgender healthcare and people ↗. Evidence that you wish the arbitrators to consider should be added to the evidence subpage, at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Transgender healthcare and people/Evidence ↗. '''Please add your evidence by August 11, 2025 at 23:59 UTC, which is when the evidence phase closes.''' You can also contribute to the case workshop subpage, Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Transgender healthcare and people/Workshop ↗. For a guide to the arbitration process, see Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Party Guide/Introduction ↗. For the Arbitration Committee, Jenson (SilverLocust 💬) 06:52, 28 July 2025 (UTC)

Temporary account IP viewer granted

right|80px|alt=The temporary account IP viewer logo, composed of the Wikipedia globe with a user and an IP address ↗
Hello, LilianaUwU. Per your request, your account has been granted ↗ '''temporary account IP viewer ↗''' rights. You are now able to reveal the IP addresses of individuals using temporary accounts ↗ that are not visible to the general public. This is very sensitive information that is only to be used to aid in anti-abuse workflows. Please take a moment to review Wikipedia:Temporary account IP viewer ↗ for more information on this user right. It is important to remember:

You must not share IP address data with someone who does not have the same access permissions unless disclosure is permissible as per guidelines listed at Foundation:Policy:Wikimedia Access to Temporary Account IP Addresses Policy ↗.

Access should not be used for political control, to apply pressure on editors, or as a threat against another editor in a content dispute. There must be a valid reason to investigate a temporary user. Note that using multiple temporary accounts is not forbidden, so long as they are not used in violation of policies (for example, block or ban evasion).

It is also important to note that the following actions are logged for others to see:

When a user accepts the preference that enables or disables IP reveal for their account.

Revealing an IP address of a temporary account.

Listing the temporary accounts that are associated with an IP address or CIDR range.

Remember, even if a user is violating policy, avoid revealing personal information if possible. Use temporary account usernames rather than disclosing IP addresses directly, or give information such as same network/not same network or similar. If you do not want the user right anymore then please ask me or another administrator and it will be removed for you. Happy editing! asilvering (talk) 16:44, 3 August 2025 (UTC)

Query

Hello, LilianaUwU,

First, thank you for your contributions to the project in so many diffferent areas, It's appreciated.

However, I have noticed that whenever an admin makes an edit or action that is opposed to your own perspective on trans isssues, you put out an immediate call for a recall or desysop for them. Frequently, you ignore years, maybe decades, of service to the project to highlight one edit they made that you disagree with. I'd just like to request you hold off on a rush to judment and try to put any recent edits into relation with an admin's entire history of service. I'm not claiming that there aren't admins making mistakes, it is obviouly happening. But why does one revert erase years of productive contributons? I sincerely would like to know how you are weighing contributions when you are agitating for an administrator to lose their admin status over some recent dispute. Thank you. '''''L'''''iz '''''Read!''''' ↗ '''''Talk!''''' 04:39, 28 August 2025 (UTC)

:@Liz I really hope you aren't saying what it looks like you're saying here. An editor's edit count and/or administrator status does not ever excuse transphobia or any other form of hate, at all whatsoever. Electricmemory (talk) 07:38, 28 August 2025 (UTC)
::Actually, come to think of it, an editor who is both an administrator and this experienced yet still decides to repeatedly violate numerous written policies doesn't deserve to walk off scotfree. I'd cut a new editor more slack than I'd give this person. Electricmemory (talk) 10:48, 28 August 2025 (UTC)
:In this specific case, Liz, said administrator was edit warring in order to violate MOS:DEADNAME ↗, something that any other editor would be blocked for. '''''LilianaUwU''''' (talk / contributions ↗) 12:47, 28 August 2025 (UTC)

Cruft

I figured we just wait until MAGA finds some other flavor of the week to freak out about then just go in and merge things back to an appropriate level of coverage. But you are entirely correct. Simonm223 (talk) 20:43, 23 September 2025 (UTC)

September 2025

30x30px ↗ {{strong|Do not add slurs, images, symbols, or other content meant to attack, harass, threaten, or disparage certain people or groups ↗ based on nationality, race, ethnicity, color, religion, sex, gender, gender identity, sexual orientation, disability, or other factors.}} Such content is {{strong|not tolerated}} by Wikipedia and as such may be hidden from public view ↗ at any time by an administrator (or in extreme cases, suppressed ↗). Articles or files of which the only purpose is to attack, harass, threaten or disparage certain people or groups are speedily deleted ↗. If you add hateful, derogatory, or bigoted content again, you may be {{strong|blocked ↗ from editing}} without further notice. 

Beluga732 (talk | contribs ↗) 23:57, 23 September 2025 (UTC)
:Give me diffs, Beluga732, or else I will assume you're assuming bad faith about me. '''''LilianaUwU''''' (talk / contributions ↗) 01:21, 24 September 2025 (UTC)
::In the Tyler James Robinson deletion discussion ↗, you wrote an offensive or abusive word in one of your comments. That bad word you wrote in your comment is obviously profane ↗ (threatens, attacks, or impersonates another person). I believe you are frustrated about a notable article being nominated for deletion, but please watch your language. For information, please take a look at WP:CIVIL ↗. Thank you. Beluga732 (talk | contribs ↗) 01:50, 24 September 2025 (UTC)
:::Wait, me saying "are you fucking kidding me" is worth all this? No, I'm not frustrated a notable article is nominated, I'm frustrated that there are seven articles about the event when I'd argue two is the most there should be (the event itself and the alleged perpetrator). '''''LilianaUwU''''' (talk / contributions ↗) 01:59, 24 September 2025 (UTC)
::::I'm sorry, but I can't help with writing bad words in talk page comments due to their offensive nature. And you just swore again. Beluga732 (talk | contribs ↗) 02:03, 24 September 2025 (UTC)
:::::(While there's a rule on Wikipedia against personal attacks ↗, and I think it's reasonable to say that "are you fucking kidding me?" in that context is a personal attack, there's no general rule against swearing. In fact, Wikipedia is explicitly not censored ↗.) Loki (talk) 16:55, 24 September 2025 (UTC)
:@Beluga732 Whether or not the comment was worth a warning (and I don't think it particularly was) - this is not the warning to give. Quite possible the worst warning to give in how off-base it is. That warning is explicitly about bigoted statements. "Are you fucking kidding me" is not a {{tq|slurs, images, symbols, or other content}} meant to {{Tq|attack, harass, threaten, or disparage certain people or groups based on nationality, race, ethnicity, color, religion, sex, gender, gender identity, sexual orientation, disability, or other factors.}}. It was an exasperated rhetorical question towards - not a slur or targeted at a group.
:In general, if you're going to warn people using "fuck" on a talk page, you'd have to probably warn half of the long-term editors on WP. Wikipedia is not censored and there is no written rule anywhere on this site that all profanity or swearing is outlawed on talk pages. Your Friendly Neighborhood Sociologist ⚧ Ⓐ (talk) 21:02, 24 September 2025 (UTC)
:Giving a level 4 warning to someone for saying {{tq|are you fucking kidding me}} has to be the most baffling decision someone has ever made. And I've seen some howlers. '''''MiasmaEternal'''''☎ ↗ 05:39, 25 September 2025 (UTC)

Notice that you are now subject to an arbitration enforcement topic ban

{{Ivmbox
|2=Commons-emblem-hand.svg
|imagesize=50px
|1=The following topic ban ↗ now applies to you:

{{Talkquote|1=You are banned from the post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people, broadly construed.}}

You have been sanctioned for a pattern of disruptive editing including irrelevant and combative personal/NOTFORUM comments ↗, profane and combative comments ↗, and unsubstantiated allegations of canvassing ↗. The immediate issue seems to particularly surround Charlie Kirk ↗, and if it were just this pattern of events I would have only banned you from that specific topic, but given the temporary TBAN ↗ I previously imposed from the full topic area for disruption regarding American political journalism, I don't think a narrow ban here would adequately prevent disruption.

This topic ban is imposed in my capacity as an uninvolved administrator ↗ under the authority of the Arbitration Committee ↗'s decision at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/American politics 2#Final decision ↗ and, if applicable, the contentious topics procedure ↗. This sanction has been recorded in the log of sanctions ↗. Please read WP:TBAN ↗ to understand what a topic ban is. If you do not comply with this topic ban, you may be blocked ↗ for an extended period, by way of enforcement of this sanction—and you may also be made subject to further sanctions.

You may appeal this sanction using the process described at {{slink|Wikipedia:Contentious topics|Appeals and amendments}}. I recommend that you use the arbitration enforcement appeals template ↗ if you wish to submit an appeal to the arbitration enforcement noticeboard. You may also appeal directly to me (on my talk page), before or instead of appealing to the noticeboard. Even if you appeal this sanction, you remain bound by it until you are notified by an uninvolved administrator that the appeal has been successful. You are also free to contact me on my talk page if anything above is unclear to you. -- Tamzin[cetacean needed] (they|xe|🤷) 02:03, 24 September 2025 (UTC)
}}

Proposed decision for Transgender healthcare and people posted

You are receiving this message because you are on the update list ↗ for ''Transgender healthcare and people'' ↗. The proposed decision ↗ has been posted. Your comments are welcome on the talk page ↗ in your own section. For the Arbitration Committee, House '''Blaster''' ↗ (talk • he/they) 03:39, 4 October 2025 (UTC)

Notice that you are now subject to an arbitration enforcement sanction (GENSEX)

{{Ivmbox
|2=Commons-emblem-hand.svg
|imagesize=50px
|1=The following sanction now applies to you:

{{Talkquote|1=Indefinite topic ban from transgender ↗-related edits, broadly construed}}

You have been sanctioned for battleground conduct ↗ such as in this this edit ↗.

This sanction is imposed in my capacity as an uninvolved administrator ↗ under the authority of the Arbitration Committee ↗'s decision at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Gender and sexuality#Final decision ↗ and, if applicable, the contentious topics procedure ↗. This sanction has been recorded in the log of sanctions ↗. If the sanction includes a ban, please read the banning policy ↗ to ensure you understand what this means. If you do not comply with this sanction, you may be blocked ↗ for an extended period, by way of enforcement of this sanction—and you may also be made subject to further sanctions.

You may appeal this sanction using the appeal process ↗. I recommend that you use the arbitration enforcement appeals template ↗ if you wish to submit an appeal to the arbitration enforcement noticeboard. You may also appeal directly to me (on my talk page), before or instead of appealing to the noticeboard. Even if you appeal this sanction, you remain bound by it until you are notified by an uninvolved administrator that the appeal has been successful. You are also free to contact me on my talk page if anything above is unclear to you. Guerillero Parlez Moi ↗ 07:16, 5 October 2025 (UTC)

}}

October 2025

<div class="user-block" style="padding: 5px; margin-bottom: 0.5em; border: 1px solid var(--border-color-base, #a2ab91); background-color: var(--background-color-warning-subtle, #fef6e7); color:inherit; min-height: 40px">40px|left|alt=Stop icon with clock ↗<div style="margin-left:45px">You have been '''blocked ↗''' from editing for a period of '''2 weeks''' for making personal attacks towards other editors ↗. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions ↗. </div><div style="margin-left:45px">If you believe that there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks ↗, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: <code><nowiki>{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}</nowiki></code>.   -- Tamzin[cetacean needed] (they|xe|🤷) 19:41, 5 October 2025 (UTC)</div></div>

:Bye. '''''LilianaUwU''''' (talk / contributions ↗) 20:01, 5 October 2025 (UTC)

:I went through many, many different comments I could make here. So many, some more blunt and blatant than others. But, in the end, I think it's best to keep it simple. I'm sad to see you supporting transphobia on Wikipedia, {{u|Tamzin}}. SilverserenC ↗ 21:17, 5 October 2025 (UTC)
::@Silver seren: This block had nothing to do with trans issues. {{slink|Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement#c-Tamzin-20251005203700-Tamzin-20251005194400}}. -- Tamzin[cetacean needed] (they|xe|🤷) 21:19, 5 October 2025 (UTC)
:::So it's even more inscrutable, since Liliana's comment there was in response to Guerillero bringing up the unrelated topic that involved that other editor. It was not a "{{tq|purely gratuitous personal attack}}", it was discussing past events and editors that Guerillero first brought up with no relation to the topic. Your block here is even more ridiculous and nonsensical. SilverserenC ↗ 21:23, 5 October 2025 (UTC)
::::It was "first brought up" by Liliana: {{tq|1=I believe this is an INVOLVED TBAN, due to Guerillero previously blocking me ↗ as an arb over similar battleground mentality concerns (which are completely false, by the way).}} jlwoodwa (talk) 21:26, 5 October 2025 (UTC)
:::::Bringing up the general subject of INVOLVED is not the same thing. Guerillero was the one who then brought up the more specific topic of the VRT ticket and the events, which Liliana was then responding to, rather than Guerillero actually addressing solely their INVOLVED status or not. Either way, Liliana's more specific explanation of the events is fully in line with that back and forth and is both not a personal attack and also not out of the blue for bringing up the other editor from the event that Guerillero was then discussing in detail. SilverserenC ↗ 21:30, 5 October 2025 (UTC)
::::Randomly pinging someone to accuse them of unspecified abuse and off-wiki misconduct because they caught you canvassing two years ago is harassment. But if you disagree, you are welcome to take the matter to AN or XRV. -- Tamzin[cetacean needed] (they|xe|🤷) 21:30, 5 October 2025 (UTC)
::Silver seren, please don't make such accusations on my talk page. What I did to earn that block was wildly petty, and completely unrelated to the TBAN or its appeal. '''''LilianaUwU''''' (talk / contributions ↗) 17:41, 24 October 2025 (UTC)

(Wish you can) get well soon

Hi. I'm not sure what to say but um...
I just wish all this mess won't affect your mood in the meatspace.

Wish you have a peaceful wikibreak.
iris 4:09a (+8). 海盐沙冰 / aka irisChronomia / Talk 20:09, 5 October 2025 (UTC)

:I'm not good at these sorts of messages so I'll just +1 to that. I hope you're doing OK. DanielRigal (talk) 19:42, 7 October 2025 (UTC)

Survey

Hi and thanks for your recent participation in AfD. I would like to hear your thoughts about the process. Please check this survey if you are willing to respond.Czarking0 (talk) 02:10, 6 October 2025 (UTC)

Guide to temporary accounts

Hello, LilianaUwU. This message is being sent to remind you of significant upcoming changes regarding logged-out editing.

'''Starting 4 November, logged-out editors will no longer have their IP address publicly displayed.''' Instead, they will have a '''temporary account ↗''' (TA) associated with their edits. Users with some extended rights like administrators and CheckUsers, as well as users with the temporary account IP viewer ↗ (TAIV) user right will still be able to reveal temporary users' IP addresses and all contributions made by temporary accounts from a specific IP address or range.

'''How do temporary accounts work?'''

thumb|350px|Editing from a temporary account ↗

When a logged-out user completes an edit or a logged action for the first time, a cookie will be set in this user's browser and a temporary account tied with this cookie will be automatically created for them. This account's name will follow the pattern: <code>~2025-12345-67</code> (a tilde, year of creation, a number split into units of 5).

All subsequent actions by the temporary account user will be attributed to this username. The cookie will expire 90 days after its creation. As long as it exists, all edits made from this device will be attributed to this temporary account. It will be the same account even if the IP address changes, unless the user clears their cookies or uses a different device or web browser.

A record of the IP address used at the time of each edit will be stored for 90 days after the edit. Users with the temporary account IP viewer ↗ (TAIV) user right will be able to see the underlying IP addresses.

As a measure against vandalism, there are two limitations on the creation of temporary accounts:

* There has to be a minimum of 10 minutes between subsequent temporary account creations from the same IP (or /64 range in case of IPv6).

* There can be a maximum of 6 temporary accounts created from an IP (or /64 range) within a period of 24 hours.

'''Temporary account IP viewer user right'''

thumb|350px|How to enable IP Reveal ↗

Administrators may grant the '''temporary account IP viewer ↗''' (TAIV) user right to non-administrators who meet the criteria for granting ↗. Importantly, an editor must make an explicit request for the permission (e.g. at WP:PERM/TAIV ↗)—administrators are not permitted to assign the right without a request.

Administrators will automatically be able to see temporary account IP information once they have accepted the Access to Temporary Account IP Addresses Policy ↗ via Special:Preferences ↗ or via the onboarding dialog which comes up after temporary accounts are deployed.

'''Impact for administrators'''

It will be possible to block many abusers by just blocking their temporary accounts. A blocked person won't be able to create new temporary accounts quickly if the admin selects the autoblock ↗ option.

It will still be possible to block an IP address or IP range.

Temporary accounts will not be retroactively applied to contributions made before the deployment. On Special:Contributions ↗, you will be able to see existing IP user contributions, but not new contributions made by temporary accounts on that IP address. Instead, you should use Special:IPContributions ↗ for this (see a video about IPContributions in a gallery below).

'''Rules about IP information disclosure'''

Publicizing an IP address gained through TAIV access is generally ↗ not allowed (e.g. {{!tq|~2025-12345-67 previously edited as 192.0.2.1}} or {{!tq|~2025-12345-67's IP address is 192.0.2.1}}).

Publicly linking a TA to another TA is allowed if "reasonably believed to be necessary". (e.g. {{tq|~2025-12345-67 and ~2025-12345-68 are likely the same person, so I am counting their reverts together toward 3RR ↗}}, but not {{!tq|Hey ~2025-12345-68, you did some good editing as ~2025-12345-67}})

See {{section link|Wikipedia:Temporary account IP viewer|What can and can't be said}} for more detailed guidelines.

'''Useful tools for patrollers'''

It is possible to view if a user has opted-in to view temporary account IPs via the User Info card ↗, available in {{Preferences|Appearance|Advanced options|check={{int:checkuser-userinfocard-enable-preference-description}}}}

* This feature also makes it possible for anyone to see the approximate count of temporary accounts active on the same IP address range.

Special:IPContributions ↗ allows viewing all edits and temporary accounts connected to a specific IP address or IP range.

Similarly, Special:GlobalContributions ↗ supports global search for a given temporary account's activity.

The auto-reveal feature (see video below) allows users with the right permissions to automatically reveal all IP addresses for a limited time window.

'''Videos'''
<gallery>
Temporary Accounts demo - IP Contributions.webm|How to use Special:IPContributions
Temporary Accounts demo - IP Auto-reveal.webm|How automatic IP reveal works
Temporary Accounts demo - IP Information.webm|How to use IP Info
Temporary Accounts demo - User Info Card.webm|How to use User Info
</gallery>

'''Further information and discussion'''

For more information and discussion regarding this change, please see the announcement from the Wikimedia Foundation at {{section link|Wikipedia:Village pump (WMF)|Temporary accounts rollout}}.

Most of this message was written by Mz7 ↗ (source). Thanks, 🎃 SGrabarczuk (WMF) (talk) 02:47, 31 October 2025 (UTC)

Redirect listed at Redirects for discussion ↗

30px ↗
Redirects you have created have been listed at redirects for discussion ↗ to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines ↗. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at '''{{slink| Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 November 2#Cary Huang }}''' until a consensus is reached.  —Myceteae{{zero width joiner}}🍄‍🟫 (talk) 16:49, 2 November 2025 (UTC)

ArbCom 2025 Elections voter message

<div class="ivmbox " style="margin-bottom: 1em; border: 1px solid #a2a9b1; background-color: #fdf2d5; padding: 0.5em; display: flex; align-items: center; ">
<div class="ivmbox-image" style="padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em;flex-basis: 40px">40px ↗</div>
<div class="ivmbox-text">
Hello! Voting in the '''2025 Arbitration Committee elections ↗''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2025|end}}-1 day}}. All '''eligible users ↗''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee ↗ is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process ↗. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans ↗, topic bans ↗, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy ↗ describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please review the candidates ↗ and submit your choices on the '''2025|poll}}|voting page ↗'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:54, 18 November 2025 (UTC)

</div>
</div>

Happy First Edit Day!

<div style="background-color:#E6E6FA; border: 1px solid #7D00B3; margin: 0.5em auto; padding: 0.5em; width:90%; text-align: center">50px|left ↗Happy First Edit Day!50px|right ↗
Have a very happy first edit anniversary!

From the Birthday Committee ↗, Nedia Wanna talk? Stalk me ↗ 01:22, 2 January 2026 (UTC)
</div>

Happy First Edit Day!

{| style="width: 80%; margin: 4px auto; padding: .2em; border: 2px dashed #FF0000; background-color: gold;"
| style="text-align:center;" |50px ↗
| style="text-align:center;" width="100%"|Hey, '''LilianaUwU'''. I'd like to wish you a wonderful First Edit Day on behalf of the Wikipedia Birthday Committee ↗! Have a great day! DaniloDaysOfOurLives (talk) 08:35, 2 January 2026 (UTC)
| style="text-align:right;" |55px ↗
|}

Sockpuppet suspected?

So I might have discovered a possible sockpuppet lurking about Wiki. In particular, do you think {{noping|LetitiaOrville}} is connected in some way to {{noping|TheGlobMonster}}, the latter of which you reverted back in March 2023 after they were blocked for socking? I raise this suspicion on the grounds that Letitia recently restored a redirect attempt at Fuck-me shoes ↗ that Glob attempted when they were still active, and both have also edited Captain Planet and the Planeteers ↗. My suspicions only go as far as that, and my hesitation for reporting comes from not only that limitation, but also that I don't know who the master would be in this case. Since I see you have some involvement, would you happen to know who the sockmaster would be in this situation? Thanks! Jalen Barks (Woof) 18:33, 19 January 2026 (UTC)

:And now they're blocked as a sock of {{noping|Fangusu}}. Nothing more needed here. Jalen Barks (Woof) 00:33, 20 January 2026 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Bubsy 4D ↗

48px|left|alt=|link= ↗

Hello, LilianaUwU. This message concerns the Articles for Creation ↗ submission or draft ↗ page you started, "Bubsy 4D ↗".

Drafts that go unedited for six months are eligible for deletion, in accordance with our draftspace policy ↗, and this one has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply {{edit|Draft:Bubsy 4D|edit the submission}}, and remove the {{tlc|db-afc}}, {{tlc|db-draft}}, or {{tlc|db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you read this, you can '''request its undeletion''' ↗. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the draft so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia!  DreamRimmer bot II (talk) 17:24, 20 February 2026 (UTC)

You may be eligible to vote in the U4C election

<section begin="announcement-content" />
I am contacting you because you previously voted in elections related to the Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) ↗. You may be eligible to vote in the current U4C election, which is open now and closes on 2 June 2026. You can find out more about the candidates and the election on the election page on Meta ↗, and from there you can access the vote itself. Your participation in these elections is important to the governance of Wikimedia communities, and your time spent learning about the candidates and voting is appreciated.

-- In cooperation with the U4C, Keegan (WMF) ↗ (talk ↗)<section end="announcement-content" />

Keegan (WMF) ↗ (talk ↗) 16:35, 20 May 2026 (UTC)

A kitten for you!

left|150px ↗
i give you evil larry,

'''nhals8''' (rats in the house of the dead) 03:53, 3 June 2026 (UTC)

Redirect listed at Redirects for discussion ↗

30px ↗
Redirects you have created have been listed at redirects for discussion ↗ to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines ↗. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at '''{{slink| Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2026 June 17#United States intervention in the Iran–Israel war }}''' until a consensus is reached.  Dudzcar (talk) 22:29, 17 June 2026 (UTC)

Birthday Cookies!

{{ombox
|type = notice
|image = 75px ↗
|style = border: 1px solid #CC9999; background-color: #f8eaba;
|text = Hungry? Here's a little snack for you on your birthday, from the Wikipedia Birthday Committee ↗! Have a great day, '''LilianaUwU'''! --☘︎☘︎☘︎'''ALEX'''Hammeke (talk | guestbook | sandbox) 02:52, 21 June 2026 (UTC)
}} ☘︎☘︎☘︎'''ALEX'''Hammeke (talk | guestbook | sandbox) 02:52, 21 June 2026 (UTC)

Happy Birthday!

{{ombox
| name = Happy Birthday
| image = 50px ↗
| imageright = 50px ↗
| style = border: 2px solid SlateBlue; background: repeating-linear-gradient(300deg, MistyRose, AntiqueWhite, Ivory, Honeydew, Azure, GhostWhite, MistyRose 50%);
| textstyle = padding: 0.75em; text-align:center;
| text = <big>'''Happy birthday!'''</big> Hi LilianaUwU! On behalf of the Birthday Committee ↗, I'd like to wish you a very happy birthday! Enjoy this special day! DaniloDaysOfOurLives (talk) 15:37, 21 June 2026 (UTC)
}}

Wikimedia Canada Train the Trainer Program Survey / Sondage pour le programme de formation à la facilitation

Wikimedia Canada ↗ is developing a Train the Trainer program to train volunteers to lead Wikimedia workshops across the country and we'd love your input!

If you are interested in learning how to teach others to contribute to a Wikimedia project, please fill out our short survey ↗ by '''July 10, 2026'''. It only takes a few minutes and it will help us create a program that works for our community.

''You have received this message because you are on the Wikimedia Canada Interest list ↗. To remove yourself from the list, please click here ↗.''

_________

Wikimédia Canada ↗ élabore actuellement un programme de formation à la facilitation destiné à former des bénévoles à l’animation d’ateliers Wikimédia et nous aimerions connaître votre avis !

Si vous souhaitez apprendre à former d’autres personnes à contribuer aux projets Wikimédia, merci de répondre à notre bref sondage ↗ avant le '''10 juillet 2026''' afin que nous puissions créer un programme adapté à notre communauté. Cela ne vous prendra que quelques minutes.

''Vous recevez ce message car vous faites partie de la liste des personnes intéressées par Wikimédia Canada ↗. Pour vous désinscrire de cette liste, veuillez cliquer ici ↗.''

-- Wikimedia Canada ↗ via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:21, 7 July 2026 (UTC)