User Talk: Nafis Fuad Ayon

Server-side rendered snapshot of this editor's Wikipedia talk page discussions.

July 2020

left|25px|alt= ↗ Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to :Equipment of the Bangladesh Army ↗ has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.
{{clear}}

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [{{User:ClueBot NG/Warnings/FPReport|3747718}} report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.

For help, take a look at the introduction ↗.

The following is the log entry regarding this message: Equipment of the Bangladesh Army ↗ was changed ↗ by Nafis Fuad Ayon ↗ (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.875615 on 2020-07-28T13:44:35+00:00

Thank you.  ClueBot NG (talk) 13:44, 28 July 2020 (UTC)

August 2020

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia ↗! Thank you for your contributions ↗; however, ''please'' remember the essential rule of respecting copyright ↗s. '''Edits to Wikipedia, such as your edit to the page :Makassar-class landing platform dock ↗, may not contain material from copyrighted sources unless used with permission.''' It is almost never okay to copy extensive text out of a book or website and paste it into a Wikipedia article with little or no alteration, though you ''can'' clearly and briefly quote copyrighted text in the right circumstances. Content that does not comply with this legal rule must be removed. For more information on this, see:

Copying text from other sources ↗

Policy on copyright ↗

Frequently asked questions on Wikipedia's copyright policy ↗

Policy and guideline on non-free content ↗

If you still have questions, there is the teahouse ↗, or you can {{edit|Special:MyTalk|click here to ask a question on your talk page|section=new|preload=Help:Contents/helpmepreload|preloadtitle=Help me!}} and someone will be along to answer it shortly. As you get started, you may find the pages below to be helpful.

Introduction ↗

Contributing to Wikipedia ↗

The five pillars of Wikipedia ↗

How to edit a page ↗

How to create your first article ↗

Simplified Manual of Style ↗

I hope you enjoy editing Wikipedia! Please sign your name ↗ on talk pages using four tilde ↗s (<nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Feel free to write a note on the bottom of my talk page if you want to get in touch with me. Again, welcome!  — Diannaa (talk) 15:15, 13 August 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 25

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Generation III reactor ↗, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Corium ↗. Such links are usually incorrect ↗, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ{{*}} Join us at the DPL WikiProject ↗.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:26, 25 August 2020 (UTC)

Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution

25px|alt=Information icon ↗ Thank you for your contributions ↗ to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from :VVER ↗ into :Rooppur Nuclear Power Plant ↗. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing ↗ does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary ↗ at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking ↗ to the copied page, e.g., <code>copied content from <nowiki>page name ↗</nowiki>; see that page's history for attribution</code>. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{tl|copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia ↗. Thank you.  If you are the sole author of the prose that was copied, attribution is not required. — Diannaa (talk) 13:20, 26 August 2020 (UTC)

September 2020

25px|alt=Warning icon ↗ Please stop your disruptive editing ↗. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at :Sukhoi Su-30 ↗, you may be blocked from editing ↗. Do not remove sourced information from an article without providing additional better sourcing.Nigel Ish (talk) 16:14, 22 September 2020 (UTC)

Bangladesh Air Force

40px|alt=Warning icon ↗ '''<big>PLEASE STOP</big>''' changing or removing reliably sourced ↗, content as you have done on the Bangladesh Air Force ↗ article. Take it to the talk page, regarding any issues, if you continue to disruptively edit you may be permanently blocked ↗ from editing - FOX 52 (talk) 18:30, 15 October 2020 (UTC)

"World airforce 2020" don't have latest information about our airforce. Nafis Fuad Ayon (talk) 18:32, 15 October 2020 (UTC)

: Wikipedia polices WP:Verifiability ↗ and WP:No original research ↗ covers this. Look them over. -Fnlayson (talk) 14:49, 19 October 2020 (UTC)

Bro Can you add the Bangladesh Air Force Aviator Badge On the page.I have seen these badges on BAF officials Mehedi099 (talk) 16:24, 12 May 2021 (UTC)

Hi Nafis,

You are adding non-related stuff to Bangladesh Air Force ↗ page. If you want to compare Rafale vs Eurofighter, please go to a blog or forum where you can write anything you want. This is Wikipedia and Wikipedia has some standards and neutral information about the topics. Please do not add non-related content into the Bangladesh Air Force ↗ page.

Hi FOX 52 (talk) and BilCat (talk) please help here.

Disambiguation link notification for November 2

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Skif (ATGM) ↗, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Skif ↗.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:46, 2 November 2020 (UTC)

সাহায্য

আমাদের মাতৃভাষা তথা বাংলা উইকিপিডিয়া ↗ একটি অতি ক্ষুদ্র উইকি, এতে অবদান রাখার আহ্বান জানাচ্ছি। ধন্যবাদ :) --আফতাবুজ্জামান (talk) 18:45, 15 November 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

<table class="messagebox " style="border: 1px solid #AAA; background: ivory; padding: 0.5em; width: 100%;">
<tr><td style="vertical-align:middle; padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em;">40px ↗</td><td>Hello! Voting in the '''2020 Arbitration Committee elections ↗''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2020|end}}-1 day}}. All '''eligible users ↗''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee ↗ is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process ↗. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans ↗, topic bans ↗, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy ↗ describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates ↗ and submit your choices on the '''2020|poll}}|voting page ↗'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:58, 24 November 2020 (UTC)
</td></tr>
</table>

Edit conflict ↗s

Hi, I'm sure you've noticed that I'm currently editing ↗ the same page ↗. Would you mind leaving off for a short while? I'd just like to finish some tweaking and then it's all yours. Thanks - wolf 18:14, 6 December 2020 (UTC)
:Ok, so... no reply and you're still editing the page. I realize you're new here and that was why I both messaged you and linked edit conflict ↗ for you. You should give it a read, as well as WP's other policies and guidelines ↗, you will need to learn them if you wish to edit this project, or else you will just run into more problems and cause more work for other editors. But anyway, you go ahead and continue doing what you're doing with that page, I'll just come back to it later. If you have any questions, don't hesitate to contact the help desk ↗, anytime. - wolf 18:34, 6 December 2020 (UTC)

Bangladesh Navy Guided missile firgates quantity.

Hamilton-class cutters of BN don't have any anti ship missile. We have 5 guided missile frigates, not 7. Nafis Fuad Ayon (talk) 06:45, 8 December 2020 (UTC)
:Is this comment intended for others? It would probably be better to post it on Talk:List of active ships of the Bangladesh Navy ↗. Not very many people will see this comment otherwise. (On another note, at least we now see that you know how to use your talk page) Have a nice day - wolf 19:23, 8 December 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion ↗ nomination of :STM Alpagu ↗

48px|left|alt=|link= ↗
{{Quote box|quote=If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article ↗.You may want to consider using the Article Wizard ↗ to help you create articles.|width=20%|align=right}}
A tag has been placed on :STM Alpagu ↗, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion ↗, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam ↗ and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations ↗ for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may '''contest the nomination''' by visiting the page ↗ and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines ↗. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the {{Querylink|Special:Log|qs=type=delete&page=STM+Alpagu|deleting administrator}}.   '''Onel5969''' TT me 14:05, 8 December 2020 (UTC)

25px|alt=Information icon ↗ Hello, I'm Deb. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions ↗ have been undone because they appeared to be promotional. Advertising ↗ and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox ↗" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted; Wikipedia articles should be written objectively, using independent sources, and from a neutral perspective ↗. Take a look at the welcome page ↗ to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you.{{PAGENAME}} ↗
 
25px|alt=Information icon ↗ Hello, Nafis Fuad Ayon. We welcome ↗ your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about ↗ on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest ↗ (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the '''conflict of interest guideline ↗''' and FAQ for organizations ↗ for more information. We ask that you:

'''avoid editing or creating''' articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization or competitors;

'''propose changes''' on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{tl|request edit}} template);

'''disclose''' your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI ↗);

'''avoid linking''' to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:Spam ↗);

'''do your best''' to comply with Wikipedia's content policies ↗.

In addition, you are '''required''' by the Wikimedia Foundation ↗'s terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure ↗.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you.{{#ifexpr: ({{#time: U | now}} - 1607596451) < 13150000 | {{PAGENAME}} ↗ | }}Deb (talk) 10:34, 10 December 2020 (UTC)

Sukhoi Su-30 - reverts

Please don't label what appear to be good faith edits as vandalism like you did https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Sukhoi_Su-30&curid=552808&diff=993950982&oldid=993949576 ↗ even if they appear to be incorrect. This doesn't help to resolve the issue peacefully.Nigel Ish (talk) 10:42, 13 December 2020 (UTC)

December 2020

25px|alt=Information icon ↗ Welcome to Wikipedia ↗ and thank you for your contributions ↗. I am glad to see that you are discussing a topic. However, as a general rule ↗, talk pages are for discussion related to improving (a) an encyclopedia article in specific ways based on reliable sources ↗ or (b) project policies and guidelines ↗. They are not for general discussion ↗ about the article topic or unrelated topics, or statements based on your thoughts or feelings. If you have specific questions about certain topics, consider visiting our reference desk ↗ and asking them there instead of on article talk pages. Thank you. Miad I Mahbub BD (talk) 11:08, 13 December 2020 (UTC)

30px|link=|alt=Copyright problem icon ↗ Your edit to :Marshall Aerospace and Defence Group ↗ has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted ↗ material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission ↗ from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials ↗ for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of ''information'', but not as a source of ''content'', such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy '''will be blocked from editing ↗'''. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources ↗ for more information.  — Diannaa (talk) 12:13, 15 December 2020 (UTC)

25px|alt=Information icon ↗ Hello and welcome to Wikipedia ↗. Constructive contributions to Wikipedia ↗ are appreciated, but a recent edit ↗ of yours to the page :Hagia Sophia ↗ has an edit summary ↗ that appears to be inaccurate or inappropriate. The summaries are helpful to people browsing an article's history ↗, so it is important that you use edit summaries that accurately tell other editors what you did. Feel free to use the sandbox ↗ to make test edits. Thank you. Elizium23 (talk) 18:31, 31 December 2020 (UTC)

25px|alt=Information icon ↗ Hello, I'm GPinkerton. I noticed that you recently removed content from :Hagia Sophia ↗ without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary ↗. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page ↗. Thanks. GPinkerton (talk) 18:35, 31 December 2020 (UTC)

A tank for you!

{| style="background-color: #fdffe7; border: 1px solid #fceb92;"
|rowspan="2" style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 5px;" | 100px ↗
|style="font-size: x-large; padding: 3px 3px 0 3px; height: 1.5em;" | '''A tank for you!'''
|-
|style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;" | It took a loot of hard work. Miad I Mahbub BD (talk) 18:28, 13 December 2020 (UTC)
|}

{{reply to|Miad I Mahbub BD}} Thank you very much.Nafis Fuad Ayon (talk) 18:29, 13 December 2020 (UTC)

সাহায্য

আমাদের মাতৃভাষা তথা বাংলা উইকিপিডিয়া ↗ একটি অতি ক্ষুদ্র উইকি, এতে অবদান রাখার আহ্বান জানাচ্ছি। আপনার সাহায্য কামনা করছি। :) --আফতাবুজ্জামান (talk) 19:10, 2 January 2021 (UTC)
:যদি লক্ষ্য করেন দেখবেন বাংলা উইকিতে সেনাবাহিনীর অস্ত্র, সরঞ্জমাদি নিয়ে নিবন্ধ নেই। যা আছে তাতে খুব বেশি লেখা নেই। যতটুকু পারেন লিখে বাঙালি পাঠকদের সাহায্য করুন ভাই। --আফতাবুজ্জামান (talk) 19:13, 2 January 2021 (UTC)

Info

Brother is 42 tons the fully loaded mass of durjoy or is it the standard mass without any load? Mehedi099 (talk) 12:50, 9 January 2021 (UTC)

:Sorry brother, I don't have accurate information about this.{{reply to|Mehedi099}}Nafis Fuad Ayon (talk) 12:58, 9 January 2021 (UTC)

Bro i have a question 😐why do we call it a type 59G BD(Durjoy).Naming it just Durjoy MBT would have been more well Mehedi099 (talk) 13:01, 9 January 2021 (UTC)

Because Durjoy is nothing but a upgradation of older Type-59 tanks. Chinese use "G" to indicate upgraded , "G(BD)" means Bangladeshi upgrade. Durjoy is its nick name.{{reply to|Mehedi099}}Nafis Fuad Ayon (talk) 13:08, 9 January 2021 (UTC)

Well as far as i know that durjoy only uses the hull of type 59 tanks.But turkey also made there altay tanks hull on basis of k2 black Panther.But your right durjoy is nothing more than just and modification.If only we could design our own hull and Toauret then it could become our own indigenously made MBT Mehedi099 (talk) 13:12, 9 January 2021 (UTC)

:There is no reliable information about the tank available in internet. The tank is not indigenously "made" because the tank upgraded with chinese modification package and parts assisted by Chinese engineers in Bangladesh Machine Tools Factory. I got this information from my army friend. Sorry I am unable to talk to you more because I have exam tomorrow. {{reply to|Mehedi099}}Nafis Fuad Ayon (talk) 13:25, 9 January 2021 (UTC)

Brother GLOBAL FIRE POWER JUST UPDATED THWT BANGLADESH HAS MORE THAN 600 TANKS.SO THE NUMBER OG DURJOY TANKS HAVE INCREASED.I UPDATED THE INFORMATION BUT SOMEONE KEEPS REMOVING IT.CAN U PLEASE SORT THIS MATTER Mehedi099 (talk) 05:08, 18 January 2021 (UTC)

Bangladesh Air Force

40px|alt=Warning icon ↗ '''<big>PLEASE STOP</big>''' changing or removing reliably sourced ↗, content as you have done on the Bangladesh Air Force ↗ article. Your reverts are reinstating sourcing from 2020, overriding the new citation(s) for 2021. If you continue to disruptively edit, you may be permanently blocked ↗ from Wikipedia FOX 52 (talk) 04:19, 23 January 2021 (UTC)

Edit warring

30px|link= ↗ You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war ↗ according to the reverts you have made on :Bangladesh Air Force ↗; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate ↗ with others, to avoid editing disruptively ↗, and to try to reach a consensus ↗, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:
# '''Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;'''
# '''Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.'''
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page ↗ to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard ↗ or seek dispute resolution ↗. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection ↗. If you engage in an edit war, you '''may be blocked ↗ from editing.'''  --Worldbruce (talk) 07:12, 23 January 2021 (UTC)

What the hell is going on???? অগ্নিশিখা (talk) 13:51, 11 May 2021 (UTC)

Indian Ocean Raid

I rolled back your edits to the article because we don't specify individual ships in the infobox and only one link per ship is used, not each time it's mentioned.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 12:58, 24 February 2021 (UTC)

: User:Sturmvogel 66 Ok. But I added link for Hermes and Vampire in "Loss of Hermes section" again . Because it will helpful for mobile version users.Nafis Fuad Ayon (talk) 14:05, 25 February 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 3

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Hongdu JL-8 ↗, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Trainer ↗.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:11, 3 March 2021 (UTC)

Morocco ordered 13 TB2 Bayraktar

Add this to Bayraktar https://mobile.ledesk.ma/2021/04/16/le-maroc-se-dote-dun-escadron-de-drones-armes-turcs-lefficacite-redoutable/

: I have added the information with an English reference. Nafis Fuad Ayon (talk) 15:25, 17 April 2021 (UTC)

Welcome!

Hi Nafis Fuad Ayon! I noticed your contributions ↗ and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

{{Clickable button 2|Help:Introduction|Learn more about editing|class=mw-ui-progressive|style=margin-left: 1.6em;}}

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia ↗ page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

{{Clickable button 2|Wikipedia:Teahouse|Get help at the Teahouse|style=margin-left: 1.6em;}}

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

{{Clickable button 2|Wikipedia:Task Center|Volunteer at the Task Center|style=margin-left: 1.6em;}}

Please remember to sign your messages on talk page ↗s by typing four tildes (<nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing!  Berek (talk) 09:07, 1 May 2021 (UTC)

: User:Berek Thank you for your valuable suggestion 🙂. Your suggestions for new Wikipedias are very encouraging.Nafis Fuad Ayon (talk) 09:24, 1 May 2021 (UTC)

I hope you find it useful: you may also find the Learn to edit and Community portal links on the left-hand column useful. I'm always available for questions too. Berek (talk) 18:32, 2 May 2021 (UTC)

Bangladesh Armoured Corps

You May have known that there is no page about the armoured corps of Bangladesh Army.And to be honest I wanted to open a page but i don't know about armoured corps in general.So I was hoping If you could help me to make a page about Bangladesh army Armoured Corps and Artillery Bridge Mehedi099 (talk) 14:19, 13 May 2021 (UTC)

: User:Mehedi099 Sorry bro, I am getting busy with my studies and other activities. Nafis Fuad Ayon (talk) 06:04, 15 May 2021 (UTC)

No problem.Ill start page.can you fill in some details when you have free time? Mehedi099 (talk) 07:46, 15 May 2021 (UTC)

Bangladesh Air Force

30px|left|alt=|link= ↗ '''DO NOT''' engaged in an edit warring ↗ as done on Bangladesh Air Force ↗ article. You are expected to collaborate ↗ with others, to avoid editing disruptively ↗, and to try to reach a consensus ↗ rather than repeatedly undoing other users'. If they're certain changes you want to make, then do them individually, as opposed to reverting the entire article. If you engage in an edit war, you '''may be blocked ↗ from editing.''' FOX 52 ''talk!'' 06:02, 13 June 2021 (UTC)

User:FOX 52 This is an abuse of your administrating power. Your table order did not follow any sequence. I am not reverting the entire article but you are doing this everytime. You are removing my logical edits even I explained it. I'm trying to improve the table and you're ruining it. Why are you lying? Do you think Wikipedia as your personal blog? Nafis Fuad Ayon (talk) 06:16, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
:Explain what sequence it should be in, and why - FOX 52 ''talk!'' 06:21, 13 June 2021 (UTC)

::User:FOX 52 The sequence should be like this:
(1)More capable aircraft top and less capable aircraft button. Example: MiG-29 top and F-7 button.
(2)More important type top and less capable type button. Example: Jet trainers top and basic trainers button.
This will surely increase redability and bring aircraft of each types close to one another. I hope now you understand what I am trying to do. Nafis Fuad Ayon (talk) 06:29, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
::: capable? Thats why we have the sub-headings, but the reader is here to just get a quick reference of what each Air Force has. - FOX 52 ''talk!'' 16:02, 13 June 2021 (UTC)

:::User:FOX 52 Is this forbidden to makes such logical sequences in Wikipedia? This sequence is not harming anyone but benefiting the readers even if it is a little bit. You have you respect logical edits of other editors. You know very well I am trying to improve our Air Force article , I also provide the references with any new information. I don't understand why you are against my edits. You have no rights to remove other's edits untill it brake any rule of Wikipedia. Nafis Fuad Ayon (talk) 05:16, 14 June 2021 (UTC)
::You'er assuming the reader will grasp the concept of an aircraft's capability over another- further your making a judgement call saying one aircraft more capable over anther, (based ob what?) speed? rate of climb? payload rate? - best to focus on content rather than non-notable details - FOX 52 ''talk!'' 05:33, 14 June 2021 (UTC)

Unconstructive edits

Hey, PN Milgem corvette (4 ships currently under construction) and Jinnah-class frigate (design phase ongoing; 2 ships planned) are separate programs. Visit the Youtube link in the references section of the J-class article for the CNS Abbasi speech in this regard.

I am reverting your recent edits to the article; if you seek further discussion, move this section to the J-class talk page.

Any further reverts (without seeking consensus) may constitute edit warring and subsequently reported for a lock. Maxx786 (talk) 08:08, 11 July 2021 (UTC)

:User:Maxx786 It is not well to threat a good wikipedian like me. It is your (or other) mistake not to mentioned the minute in the 30 minutes+ long video.Nafis Fuad Ayon (talk) 10:55, 11 July 2021 (UTC)

Bangladesh Naval Aviation

40px|alt=Warning icon ↗ '''<big> STOP</big>''' disruptively editing ↗. If you continue to remove sourced ↗ content, as you did at Bangladesh Naval Aviation ↗ page, you will be blocked from editing ↗ - FOX 52 ''talk!'' 17:00, 18 July 2021 (UTC)

:User:FOX 52 It is sad but reality Flight Global does not provide accurate information for smaller air forces. We are victims. Nafis Fuad Ayon (talk) 18:47, 18 July 2021 (UTC)

Bangladesh Air Force

Need attention on the modernization section. People are adding random stuff from German Air Force into the page of Bangladesh Air Force. If someone likes to contribute to German Air Force, please feel free to contribute to German Air Force page. People also writing the same sentence again and again such as "Bangladesh will buy European fighter jets" after each paragraph. It confuses the reader. Please maintain tone and neutrality of the Wikipedia. Thanks again. Canberra2021 (talk)

:{{reply to|Canberra2021}} Information related to Tranche 4 and Tranche 3A added by me to the Eurofighter Typhoon related articles.Nafis Fuad Ayon (talk) 07:57, 20 July 2021 (UTC)

Bangladesh army

Many fire arms are missing from the small arms section also the uniform section is not upto mark.Please update these sections and provide proper informations Mehedi099 (talk) 14:23, 20 July 2021 (UTC)

:User:Mehedi099 It is not possible to add any information without a reference from reliable source. Because other users or administrators will remove it. Nafis Fuad Ayon (talk) 15:31, 20 July 2021 (UTC)

But what the special force uses pt pindad,aug,kriss vector etc they are confirmed by the army itself,and if they need reference we can add picture Mehedi099 (talk) 14:48, 21 July 2021 (UTC)

August 2021

{{checkuserblock-account|sig=Drmies (talk) 17:54, 21 August 2021 (UTC)}}

Aselsan STAMP-2 ↗ moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Aselsan STAMP-2 ↗, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable ↗, independent sources ↗. (? ↗) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability ↗ is of central importance ↗ on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace ↗ (with a prefix of "<code>Draft:</code>" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline ↗ and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. '''scope_creepTalk''' 19:47, 3 November 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Aselsan STAMP-2 ↗

25px|alt=Information icon ↗ Hello, Nafis Fuad Ayon. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Aselsan STAMP-2 ↗, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted ↗, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it ↗ again or request ↗ that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted ↗ so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 20:02, 5 April 2022 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Aselsan STAMP-2 ↗

48px|left|alt=|link= ↗

Hello, Nafis Fuad Ayon. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation ↗ submission or Draft ↗ page you started, "Aselsan STAMP-2 ↗".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace ↗, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion ↗. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing.  '''''L'''''iz '''''Read!''''' ↗ '''''Talk!''''' 19:59, 3 May 2022 (UTC)

Unblocked

Following a successful appeal to the Arbitration Committee, I have unblocked your account. As we discussed by email, you have agreed to publicly disclose your prior accounts: {{user|Yamato Bismarck Hood Iowa}} and {{user|The Gentle Daffodil}}. When you next edit, please take a moment and disclose the connection on the userpages of those two accounts. Going forward, you should use only this account and disclosed alts. Best, '''KevinL''' (aka L235 '''·''' t '''·''' c ↗) 01:17, 2 September 2022 (UTC)

List of active ships of the Turkish Naval Forces

Hi Nafis, could you please take a look at the List of active ships of the Turkish Naval Forces ↗? A user adds platforms are not in inventory. Ata Barış (talk) 09:41, 18 September 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

<div class="ivmbox " style="margin-bottom: 1em; border: 1px solid #AAA; background-color: ivory; padding: 0.5em; display: flex; align-items: center; ">
<div class="ivmbox-image" style="padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em; flex: 1 0 40px;">40px ↗</div>
<div class="ivmbox-text">
Hello! Voting in the '''2022 Arbitration Committee elections ↗''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2022|end}}-1 day}}. All '''eligible users ↗''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee ↗ is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process ↗. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans ↗, topic bans ↗, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy ↗ describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates ↗ and submit your choices on the '''2022|poll}}|voting page ↗'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:48, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

</div>
</div>

Introduction to contentious topics

{{ivmbox | image = Commons-emblem-notice.svg |imagesize=50px | bg = #E5F8FF | text = You have recently edited a page related to '''Armenia ↗, Azerbaijan ↗, or related conflicts''', a topic designated as '''contentious ↗'''. This standard message is designed as an introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as ''contentious topics''. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;

comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;

follow editorial and behavioural best practice;

comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and

refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics ''procedures'' you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard ↗ or you may learn more about this contentious topic here ↗. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{tl|Ctopics/aware}} template. }} - Kevo327 ↗ (talk) 15:20, 29 September 2023 (UTC)

September 2023

30px|link= ↗ You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war ↗ according to the reverts you have made on :Flight of Nagorno-Karabakh Armenians ↗. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate ↗ with others, to avoid editing disruptively ↗, and to try to reach a consensus ↗, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:
# '''Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;'''
# '''Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.'''
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page ↗ to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard ↗ or seek dispute resolution ↗. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection ↗. If you engage in an edit war, you '''may be blocked ↗ from editing.''' ''In the past 24 hours, you have made at least six reverts ({{diff2|1177720885|1}}, {{diff2|1177727790|2}}, {{diff2|1177735647|3}}, {{diff2|1177804933|4}}, {{diff2|1177870301|5}}, {{diff2|1177872702|6}}), and I suspect I have missed some.''

''You are well over the bright-line restriction of WP:3RR ↗; I note that your most recent revert has already been reverted as so a self-revert is not possible, but I suggested you step back from the article now.'' BilledMammal (talk) 04:32, 30 September 2023 (UTC)

October 2023

25px|alt=|link= ↗ Please stop your disruptive editing ↗.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute ↗ with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page ↗, and seek consensus ↗ with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution ↗ page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards ↗.

If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents ↗.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing ↗.  - Kevo327 ↗ (talk) 14:29, 1 October 2023 (UTC)
:I am not doing any disruptive editing. <del>You are just a pro Armenia editor continuously damaging neutrality of several articles related to Azerbaijan Armenian conflict.</del> Nafis Fuad Ayon (talk) 14:54, 1 October 2023 (UTC)
::Nafis Fuad Ayon, I would strongly encourage you to strike the second sentence in your comment; it's a personal attack ↗ that doesn't assume good faith ↗, and it isn't conducive to a collaborative editing environment particularly in a contentious topic area like this one. BilledMammal (talk) 16:10, 1 October 2023 (UTC)
:::User:BilledMammal Done. Thank you for your suggestion. Nafis Fuad Ayon (talk) 16:20, 1 October 2023 (UTC)
::::Thank you; I appreciate that. BilledMammal (talk) 16:21, 1 October 2023 (UTC)

25px|alt=Information icon ↗ Please refrain from using talk pages for general discussion of this or other topics. They are for discussion related to improving the article in specific ways, based on reliable sources ↗ and the project policies and guidelines ↗; they are not for use as a forum or chat room ↗. If you have specific questions about certain topics, consider visiting our reference desk ↗ and asking them there instead of on article talk pages. See the talk page guidelines ↗ for more information. Thank you. - Kevo327 ↗ (talk) 06:46, 5 October 2023 (UTC)

Concern about MRT Line 1 (Dhaka Metro) ↗

I noticed you reverted my edit although I provided the reason behind that. Let me clear about it, we summarized the whole article on the top. The whole content is provided with sources that verify the content on the top section. That's why we don't usually provide source for the top section. That's why removing source from top section is permissible. But there are exceptions and this article is not under exception. I hope you understand. It will be better if you notice edit summary before revert anyone's edit. Mehedi Abedin 17:26, 2 November 2023 (UTC)

:Mehedi Abedin ↗: Your point of view or personal manual of style is not a rule of wikipedia. There are hundreds of thousands of Wikipedia articles with reference on the top. I hope you understand reference on top paragraph is not restricted by wikipedia. I have full rights to add any related reference on top of the any wikipedia articles.Nafis Fuad Ayon (talk) 13:31, 5 November 2023 (UTC)

Another concern and I am reverting your revert

Here your reverted my edit ↗ calling misinformation which is ridiculous. First, MRT Line 6 is divided by initial phases and extension. After initial phases we call it a operational, not ongoing project. The extension to Kamalapur is part of extension, not ongoing project. Please research thoroughly before reverting any edit or at least discuss with editors. Your talk page is full of warning and it is clear that you can't understand something. Mehedi Abedin 05:59, 5 November 2023 (UTC)

:Mehedi Abedin ↗: MRT 6 is not yet fully operational. Bijoy Sarani, Kawran Bazar, Shahbagh and Dhaka University stations are yet to open.Please do research too.Nafis Fuad Ayon (talk) 13:22, 5 November 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion ↗ nomination of :Terabox ↗

Orphaned non-free image File:TeraBox logo.jpg

35px|text-top|left|⚠|link= ↗ Thanks for uploading ''':File:TeraBox logo.jpg ↗'''. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use ↗. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media ↗).

Note that any non-free images not used in any '''articles''' will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion ↗. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:49, 17 November 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

<div class="ivmbox " style="margin-bottom: 1em; border: 1px solid #AAA; background-color: ivory; padding: 0.5em; display: flex; align-items: center; ">
<div class="ivmbox-image" style="padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em; flex: 1 0 40px; max-width: 100px">40px ↗</div>
<div class="ivmbox-text">
Hello! Voting in the '''2023 Arbitration Committee elections ↗''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2023|end}}-1 day}}. All '''eligible users ↗''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee ↗ is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process ↗. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans ↗, topic bans ↗, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy ↗ describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates ↗ and submit your choices on the '''2023|poll}}|voting page ↗'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:00, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

</div>
</div>

Speedy deletion ↗ nomination of :KAI FA-50 Fighting Eagle ↗

48px|left|alt=|link= ↗
{{Quote box|quote=If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article ↗.You may want to consider using the Article Wizard ↗ to help you create articles.|width=20%|align=right}}
A tag has been placed on :KAI FA-50 Fighting Eagle ↗ requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion ↗, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement ↗. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://svppbellum.blogspot.com/2020/10/il-kai-t-50-golden-eagle-le-autorita.html?m=1. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of ''information'', but not as a source of ''sentences''. This part is crucial: ''say it in your own words''. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators '''will be blocked from editing ↗'''.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you ''must'' verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials ↗. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission ↗ for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy ↗ for more details, or ask a question here ↗.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may '''contest the nomination''' by visiting the page ↗ and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines ↗.  ~~ αvírαm<nowiki>|</nowiki>(tαlk) 13:37, 17 January 2024 (UTC)

::αvírαm ↗ I request to remove the copyright violation part (if any) only not the whole article. 99% information of this article is moved from the KAI T-50 Golden Eagle ↗ Wikipedia article. If need to delete the whole article delete both of the articles. In my openion https://svppbellum.blogspot.com/2020/10/il-kai-t-50-golden-eagle-le-autorita.html?m=1 copied from the original KAI T-50 Golden Eagle ↗ article. I mention same in the KAI FA-50 Fighting Eagle ↗ article talk page.--Nafis Fuad Ayon (talk) 13:43, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
:::Hi.. It seems you are attempting to make article split (WP:SPLIT ↗) from KAI T-50 Golden Eagle ↗. Refer to WP:WHENSPLIT ↗, the only acceptable reasons to make article split are {{tq|size, notability and potential neutrality issues}}. IMO, KAI T-50 Golden Eagle ↗ don't have issue in article size, FA-50 is not more notable than T-50, lastly.. I dont think there is any issue on neutrality. Ckfasdf (talk) 23:43, 17 January 2024 (UTC)

CS1 error on Alcotán-100 ↗

25px|alt=|link= ↗ Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have '''automatically detected''' that this edit ↗ performed by you, on the page :Alcotán-100 ↗, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A "bare URL ↗ and missing title ↗" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. ([//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Alcot%C3%A1n-100&action=edit&minor=minor&summary=Fixing+reference+error+raised+by+%5B%5BUser%3AQwerfjkl%20(bot)%7CQwerfjkl%20(bot)%5D%5D Fix] | [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&preload=User:Qwerfjkl%20(bot)/helpform&preloadtitle=Referencing%20errors%20on%20%5B%5BSpecial%3ADiff%2F1206923541%7CAlcotán-100%5D%5D Ask for help])

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive ↗, you can [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:Qwerfjkl/Botpreload&editintro=User:Qwerfjkl/boteditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:Qwerfjkl&preloadtitle=Qwerfjkl%20(bot)%20–%20Nafis_Fuad_Ayon&section=new&preloadparams%5b%5d={{FULLPAGENAMEE:Alcotán-100}}&preloadparams%5b%5d=1206923541 report it to my operator].
Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 14:06, 13 February 2024 (UTC)

Contentious topic alert

Introduction to contentious topics

{{ivmbox | image = Commons-emblem-notice.svg |imagesize=50px | bg = #E5F8FF | text = You have recently edited a page related to '''the Balkans or Eastern Europe''', a topic designated as '''contentious ↗'''. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as ''contentious topics''. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;

comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;

follow editorial and behavioural best practice;

comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and

refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics ''procedures'' you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard ↗ or you may learn more about this contentious topic here ↗. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{tl|Ctopics/aware}} template. See also WP:GS/RUSUKR ↗ for general sanction that specifically relate to the Russian invasion of Ukraine ↗, broadly construed. }} Cinderella157 (talk) 11:51, 17 February 2024 (UTC)

February 2024

25px|alt=|link= ↗ Please stop your disruptive editing ↗.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute ↗ with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page ↗, and seek consensus ↗ with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution ↗ page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards ↗.

If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents ↗.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing ↗.  Vanezi (talk) 09:26, 22 February 2024 (UTC)

:: I am just trying to improve the article. I have no desire to waste my time to engage in an edit war.Nafis Fuad Ayon (talk) 09:32, 22 February 2024 (UTC)

Mariupol ↗

Please note there is no consensus to change location/control in the infobox of settlements since the 2022 invasion. Thanks. Mellk (talk) 00:15, 13 March 2024 (UTC)

::Ok.Nafis Fuad Ayon (talk) 03:29, 13 March 2024 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Nafis Fuad Ayon. Thank you for your work on QW-2 MANPADS ↗. SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process ↗, had the following comments:

{{Bq|1=Good day! Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia by writing this article. I have marked the article as reviewed. Have a wonderful and blessed day for you and your family!}}

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{code|<nowiki>{{Re|</nowiki>SunDawn<nowiki>}}</nowiki>}}. Please remember to sign your reply with {{code|<nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation ↗ tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

&maltese; SunDawn &maltese; (contact) 03:26, 1 April 2024 (UTC)

:Thank you.Nafis Fuad Ayon (talk) 04:09, 1 April 2024 (UTC)

June 2024

25px|alt=Information icon ↗ Hello, I'm Swatjester. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, :YJ-12 ↗, but you didn't provide a reliable source ↗. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation ↗ and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners ↗. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. ''Please note that per consensus at the Reliable Sources Noticeboard, Armyrecognition.com is not considered a reliable source and should be avoided.''  ⇒SWATJester ↗ Shoot Blues, Tell VileRat! 22:38, 29 June 2024 (UTC)

July 2024

25px|alt=Information icon ↗ Please do not add or change content, as you did at :Type 055 destroyer ↗, without citing a reliable source ↗. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources ↗ and take this opportunity to add references to the article. You've been editing for four years; WP:VERIFY ↗ should be second-nature by now. - RovingPersonalityConstruct (talk, contribs ↗) 10:53, 4 July 2024 (UTC)

Anti-submarine ballistic artillery ↗

If your undiscussed page move is contested, an appropriate response is to '''''discuss''''' it next, not to just start making even more random page moves and scattering misspellings around. Andy Dingley (talk) 13:53, 10 July 2024 (UTC)

::Sure.Nafis Fuad Ayon (talk) 02:28, 11 July 2024 (UTC)

Please '''''STOP''''' making yet more musical chairs page moves to the article Anti-submarine mortar ↗. If this is to be moved, then OK. But get some consensus ''first'' before moving it. You have moved it what, three times so far? That just causes chaos, broken links, and double (or triple!) redirects.

Learn to spell the article subject correctly ''before'' doing any more edits to a simple misspelling of it.

Understand WP:NOTBROKEN ↗. If we have to find a way to rephrase the target article to cover both mortars and unguided rockets, then so be it. But other articles that are clearly about mortars should ''stay'' describing these weapons as mortars, not suddenly switch to an invented term instead. Appropriate use of article redirects is part of that. An article on one particular anti-submarine mortar should still link to anti-submarine mortar ↗, not suddenly something about rockets!

You are using gish galloping ↗ to try and win an edit war here. Just by not discussing anything and making countless rapid edits in the meantime you seek to spread confusion and simply run faster than any other editors. The solution to that is a simple bulk revert of all of your edits (I'd support that, if anyone wants to do it) and potentially a much deserved topic ban from page moves at all. Andy Dingley (talk) 10:44, 11 July 2024 (UTC)

::: I understand. I am just trying to improve the article and remove confusion between rockets and mortars. Please improve the article.Nafis Fuad Ayon (talk) 11:55, 11 July 2024 (UTC)

November 2024

I've reverted your undiscussed page move at Anti-ship missile ↗. Everything that {{yo|Andy Dingley}} was telling you in the above section, is still applicable here. A great many sources directly refer to the general concept of anti-ship missiles, separately from their ballistic and cruise subvariants. There was simply no call for, nor need, to move and rename the general article into covering only one specific variant. Nobody was asking for that, and it doesn't help reduce confusion in the topic space. Please discuss and gain consensus through a formal move discussion before making controversial moves like this, particularly if you've already been warned about this in the past. As for the article in question, I'd suggest just making a new page for anti-ship cruise missile ↗ instead of it being a redirect. Much of the content from the broader anti-ship missile ↗ page would be useful there; but that does not justify getting rid of the broader page. ⇒SWATJester ↗ Shoot Blues, Tell VileRat! 21:25, 11 November 2024 (UTC)

::Thank you.Nafis Fuad Ayon (talk) 01:00, 12 November 2024 (UTC)

: Your renames continue to be a problem. In what possible way was the Penguin ↗ a 'cruise missile' ? I would remind you of WP:OR ↗ and WP:RS ↗. This is just basic stuff here, and you seem to pay no attention to it. Andy Dingley (talk) 01:51, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
:::Pardon me.Nafis Fuad Ayon (talk) 01:56, 12 November 2024 (UTC)

:Category:Fighter aircraft in production ↗ has been nominated for deletion

<div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">48px|alt=|link= ↗</div>:Category:Fighter aircraft in production ↗ has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization ↗ guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at '''the category's entry ↗''' on the categories for discussion ↗ page. Thank you. The Bushranger One ping only 06:45, 13 November 2024 (UTC)

Shenyang J-31B

You have repeatedly removed sourced information about the J-31B from Shenyang J-35 ↗ while claiming that the "J-35 and previously reported J-31B is the same aircraft." Please see Talk:Shenyang J-35#J-31B ↗ about why attempts to remove it from the article have been reverted. If you have any sources confirming that the J-31B and J-35 are indeed the same aircraft, feel free to provide them there. - ZLEA T\C ↗ 19:12, 15 November 2024 (UTC)

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

<div class="ivmbox " style="margin-bottom: 1em; border: 1px solid #a2a9b1; background-color: #fdf2d5; padding: 0.5em; display: flex; align-items: center; ">
<div class="ivmbox-image noresize" style="padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em;">40px ↗</div>
<div class="ivmbox-text">
Hello! Voting in the '''2024 Arbitration Committee elections ↗''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2024|end}}-1 day}}. All '''eligible users ↗''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee ↗ is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process ↗. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans ↗, topic bans ↗, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy ↗ describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates ↗ and submit your choices on the '''2024|poll}}|voting page ↗'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:47, 19 November 2024 (UTC)

</div>
</div>

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi Nafis Fuad Ayon. Thank you for your work on Merlin (missile) ↗. Another editor, North8000, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol ↗ and left the following comment:

{{Bq|1=Nice work}}

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{code|<nowiki>{{Re|</nowiki>North8000<nowiki>}}</nowiki>}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation ↗ tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

''North8000'' (talk) 16:56, 24 January 2025 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi Nafis Fuad Ayon. Thank you for your work on Peregrine (missile) ↗. Another editor, North8000, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol ↗ and left the following comment:

{{Bq|1=Good start}}

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{code|<nowiki>{{Re|</nowiki>North8000<nowiki>}}</nowiki>}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation ↗ tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

''North8000'' (talk) 16:56, 24 January 2025 (UTC)

Help

i have created a new article P-282 SMASH ↗ . Please add more information. Vortex87878 (talk) 14:34, 3 February 2025 (UTC)

::{{User|Vortex87878}} Sure.Nafis Fuad Ayon (talk) 14:39, 3 February 2025 (UTC)
::::: {{User|Vortex87878}} The page is no longer available.Nafis Fuad Ayon (talk) 18:27, 7 February 2025 (UTC)
::::::Draft:P-282 SMASH ↗ Vortex87878 (talk) 06:39, 8 February 2025 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 16

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Bangladesh women's national football team ↗, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Peter Butler ↗.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:58, 16 February 2025 (UTC)

:Category:Hybrid cruise missile attack submarine ↗ has been nominated for deletion

<div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">48px|alt=|link= ↗</div>:Category:Hybrid cruise missile attack submarine ↗ has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization ↗ guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at '''the category's entry ↗''' on the categories for discussion ↗ page. Thank you. Gjs238 (talk) 00:57, 14 March 2025 (UTC)

Nomination of :VLS-equipped multipurpose attack submarine ↗ for deletion

<div class="afd-notice">
<div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0;">48px|alt=|link= ↗</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article :VLS-equipped multipurpose attack submarine ↗ is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines ↗ or whether it should be deleted ↗.

The article will be discussed at '''Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/VLS-equipped multipurpose attack submarine ↗''' until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.</div> Melbguy05 (talk) 07:34, 10 April 2025 (UTC)

:This is a completely new type of submarine class. There is no other option than creating this article. This type of submarine is going to be the mainstream submarine of future major navies. The problem is you can't simply call those submarines just attack submarine (classic attack submarines only equipped with torpedo tubes) or cruise missile submarine (such as Virginia class attack submarine) or ballistic missile submarine (such as KSS-III class attack submarine). This type of submarine is a hybrid between attack submarine ↗ and cruise-missile submarine ↗ and/or ballistic missile submarine ↗. Nafis Fuad Ayon (talk) 07:40, 10 April 2025 (UTC)
::You don't have any reliable sources WP:RS ↗ which verify WP:V ↗ your claim that there is a new type ↗ of military submarine. There may be sources sometime in the future that verify that there is a new type in which case the article could be republished with those sources (perhaps with a different article title WP:TITLE ↗ depending on the sources). Melbguy05 (talk) 14:23, 10 April 2025 (UTC)

:Category:VLS-equipped attack submarines ↗ has been nominated for deletion

<div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">48px|alt=|link= ↗</div>:Category:VLS-equipped attack submarines ↗ has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization ↗ guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at '''the category's entry ↗''' on the categories for discussion ↗ page. Thank you. The Bushranger One ping only 03:28, 23 April 2025 (UTC)

Sources

Looking at your additions to Attack submarine ↗ (https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Attack_submarine&diff=1286650523&oldid=1284991955 ↗), some things to keep in mind:

Stick to reliable sources. This has a particular meaning, and it depends on the credibility of author and/or publisher. In your edits, you used a number of unreliable or questionable sources:

: https://www.strategicfront.org (this is a WP:BLOG ↗)

: EurAsian (not reliable; WP:EURASIANTIMES ↗)

: https://strongernavy.org (also a WP:BLOG ↗)

As an aside, elsewhere in Special:Diff/1286876376 ↗ you used naval-technology.com, which is apparently questionable Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Noticeboard/Archive_424#Army_Technology_(army-technology.com)/Air_Force_Technology/Naval_Technology ↗.

If you're going to use a video, include a timestamp (Wikipedia:Video links ↗); this is like including page numbers for long documents.

Also, because you're WP:REFBOMBING ↗ to mask the lack of credibility and/or verifibility the sources are giving to your point. You copied the contents of your deleted article into attack submarine even ''after'' Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/VLS-equipped_multipurpose_attack_submarine ↗ raised concerns of WP:OR ↗ and WP:SYNTH ↗. That you didn't dispute this makes me question the quality of the additions to the attack submarine article. - RovingPersonalityConstruct (talk, contribs ↗) 04:25, 23 April 2025 (UTC)

::: I am going to replace those references with more reliable sources.Nafis Fuad Ayon (talk) 05:54, 23 April 2025 (UTC)

VLS-equipped attack submarine in Attack submarine ↗ article

30px|alt=Stop icon ↗ You may be '''blocked from editing ↗ without further warning''' the next time you violate Wikipedia's no original research policy ↗ by inserting unpublished information or your personal analysis into an article, as you did at :Attack submarine ↗. VLS-equipped attack submarine is not a term that is used as discussed in Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/VLS-equipped multipurpose attack submarine ↗ which was deleted. It is WP:OR ↗. Melbguy05 (talk) 08:05, 23 April 2025 (UTC)

May 2025

25px|alt=Information icon ↗ Hi Nafis Fuad Ayon! I noticed that you have reverted to restore your preferred version of an article several times. The impulse to undo an edit you disagree with is understandable, but I wanted to make sure you're aware that the edit warring policy ↗ disallows repeated reversions even if they are justifiable.

All editors are expected to discuss content disputes on article talk pages ↗ to try to reach consensus ↗. If you are unable to agree, please use one of the dispute resolution options ↗ to seek input from others. Using this approach instead of reverting can help you avoid getting drawn into an edit war. Thank you. KhndzorUtogh (talk) 07:36, 4 May 2025 (UTC)

Notice of Dispute resolution noticeboard discussion

60px|left ↗
This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard ↗ regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help this dispute come to a resolution. The thread is "Shenyang J-35 ↗".The discussion is about the topic :Shenyang J-35 ↗.
Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you! {{clear}}

H/PJ-26 76 mm naval gun ↗

You need to be mindful WP:INTEGRITY ↗ when using multiple sources; you need to make sure that info is verified against the correct source. Claiming all the sources are applicable to the attributed info starts looking like, or veering into, WP:REFCLUTTER ↗; that typically happens when you're using poor/bad sources and ''trying to hide'' that you're using poor/bad sources.

Which in this case you were. Deagal and weaponsystems.net are ''not'' reliable sources. Note how those sources ''fail'' to provide any information on the authors or editors, particularly where their expertise and/or qualifications are concerned. The mil.sina.cn isn't much better. The article needs other and better sources. Familiarize yourself Wikipedia:Reliable sources ↗ before editing any farther; this seems to be a running problem with your editing. - RovingPersonalityConstruct (talk, contribs ↗) 21:24, 21 July 2025 (UTC)

: And another thing: always add the source's author to citations. It is no mistake that the citation templates have parameters for those; use them. - RovingPersonalityConstruct (talk, contribs ↗) 22:17, 21 July 2025 (UTC)

25px|alt=Information icon ↗ Please do not add original research ↗ or novel syntheses ↗ of published material to articles as you apparently did to :H/PJ-26 76 mm naval gun ↗. Please cite a reliable source ↗ for all of your contributions. A quick search through the previous sources does not verify the name of the chief designer. - RovingPersonalityConstruct (talk, contribs ↗) 21:36, 21 July 2025 (UTC)

If you are going to keep making major changes to articles, do keep the above in mind. I took a quick look over of MKE 76 mm/62-caliber gun ↗, and much of the same problems were present in that as in H/PJ-26 76 mm naval gun. Compare your revision (Special:Permalink/1302412862 ↗) with what I ended up with (Special:Permalink/1302459392 ↗.)

Note the addition of author names to references, the removal of the cite WP:OVERKILL ↗ and the better use of some of the sources, and better supporting refs for the infobox. Stuff in the infobox and the lede does not need to be referenced ''if'' the info is in the body; anything else needs refs. - RovingPersonalityConstruct (talk, contribs ↗) 14:56, 25 July 2025 (UTC)

::: {{User|RovingPersonalityConstruct}} I understand. I will do better in future. I only add reliable and official sources in the new MKE 76 mm/62-caliber gun ↗ page.Nafis Fuad Ayon (talk) 15:21, 25 July 2025 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi Nafis Fuad Ayon. Thank you for your work on Roketsan ASW rocket launcher system ↗. Another editor, SunDawn, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol ↗ and left the following comment:

{{Bq|1=Thank you for taking the time to create the article! Have a blessed day!}}

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{code|<nowiki>{{Re|</nowiki>SunDawn<nowiki>}}</nowiki>}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation ↗ tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

&maltese; '''SunDawn''' &maltese; Contact me! 13:15, 5 September 2025 (UTC)

::{{Re|SunDawn}} It's my pleasure. Thank you for your encouragement.Nafis Fuad Ayon (talk) 19:50, 18 September 2025 (UTC)

October 2025

25px|alt=Information icon ↗ Please do not add or change content, as you did at :Northrop B-2 Spirit ↗, without citing a reliable source ↗. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources ↗ to see how to add references to an article. Thank you. '''''KNHaw''''' (talk) 14:26, 21 October 2025 (UTC)

ArbCom 2025 Elections voter message

<div class="ivmbox " style="margin-bottom: 1em; border: 1px solid #a2a9b1; background-color: #fdf2d5; padding: 0.5em; display: flex; align-items: center; ">
<div class="ivmbox-image" style="padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em;flex-basis: 40px">40px ↗</div>
<div class="ivmbox-text">
Hello! Voting in the '''2025 Arbitration Committee elections ↗''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2025|end}}-1 day}}. All '''eligible users ↗''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee ↗ is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process ↗. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans ↗, topic bans ↗, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy ↗ describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please review the candidates ↗ and submit your choices on the '''2025|poll}}|voting page ↗'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:48, 18 November 2025 (UTC)

</div>
</div>

Introduction to contentious topics

{{ivmbox | image = Commons-emblem-notice.svg |imagesize=50px | bg = #E5F8FF | text = You have recently edited a page related to '''the region of South Asia ↗ (India, Pakistan, Afghanistan, Sri Lanka, Bangladesh and Nepal), broadly construed, including but not limited to history, politics, ethnicity, and social groups''', a topic designated as '''''contentious ↗'''''. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as ''contentious topics''. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee ↗. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia's norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators ↗ have an expanded level of powers and discretion in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia ↗;

comply with all applicable policies and guidelines ↗;

follow editorial and behavioural best practices;

comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and

refrain from gaming the system ↗.

Additionally, you must be logged in, have 500 edits, and have an account age of 30 days ↗ in order to make edits related to two subtopics: (1) Indian military history, or (2) social groups, explicitly including caste associations and political parties related to India, Pakistan, Sri Lanka, Bangladesh and Nepal.Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures, you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard ↗ or you may learn more about this contentious topic ↗. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{tl|Ctopics/aware}} template. }} --Worldbruce (talk) 07:45, 10 December 2025 (UTC)

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion

link=|25px|alt=Information icon ↗
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring ↗ regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring ↗.  Thank you. Worldbruce (talk) 16:06, 10 December 2025 (UTC)

December 2025

<div class="user-block" style="padding: 5px; margin-bottom: 0.5em; border: 1px solid var(--border-color-base, #a2ab91); background-color: var(--background-color-warning-subtle, #fef6e7); color:inherit; min-height: 40px">40px|left|alt=Stop icon with clock ↗<div style="margin-left:45px">You have been '''blocked ↗''' from editing for a period of '''24 hours''' for edit warring ↗ and violating the three-revert rule ↗, as you did at :Bangladesh Air Force ↗. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions ↗. </div><div style="margin-left:45px">During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes ↗ and seek consensus ↗. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution ↗, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection ↗.</div><div style="margin-left:45px">If you believe that there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks ↗, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: <code><nowiki>{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}</nowiki></code>.  – '''brad''v''''' 16:15, 10 December 2025 (UTC)</div></div>

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi Nafis Fuad Ayon. Thank you for your work on MKE 120 MM 44C ↗. Another editor, SunDawn, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol ↗ and left the following comment:

{{Bq|1=Thank you for creating the article! Your contributions are greatly appreciated, have a blessed day!}}

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{code|<nowiki>{{Re|</nowiki>SunDawn<nowiki>}}</nowiki>}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation ↗ tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

&maltese; '''SunDawn''' &maltese; Contact me! 03:10, 5 January 2026 (UTC)

Shenyang J-31B again

Please don't add unsourced speculation such as this ↗ again. - ZLEA TǀC ↗ 14:50, 8 January 2026 (UTC)

MQ-28

It is debatable whether or not the Kiz. is a loyal wingman because we have deputable sources stating that it is, and that it may not be as it is yet to be demonstrated.

Because of that, it isn't appropriate to talk about whether or not the Kiz. could be or may not be a loyal wingman on the MQ-28's page, as that belongs on the Kiz.'s own page. Also, the larger edit further down is not relevant to the MQ-28's wiki. Saying the missile was guided by the E-7 is sufficient and factual. Saying that the Kiz.'s radar directed its own missile should be on the Kiz.'s page. Decooldude (talk) 07:45, 24 January 2026 (UTC)

Bangladesh Air Force UAV manufacturing and assembly plant ↗ moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Bangladesh Air Force UAV manufacturing and assembly plant ↗. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing as a live article at this time because '''it consists of machine-generated text'''.
I have converted it to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page ↗.
When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Ckfasdf (talk) 01:31, 5 February 2026 (UTC)

::{{User|Ckfasdf}} Sure, I am going to improve it very soon.Nafis Fuad Ayon (talk) 02:24, 5 February 2026 (UTC)

CS1 error on Lockheed Martin F-16V Viper ↗

25px|alt=|link= ↗ Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have '''automatically detected''' that this edit ↗ performed by you, on the page :Lockheed Martin F-16V Viper ↗, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A generic name ↗ error. References show this error when author or editor name parameters use place-holder names. Please edit the article to include the source's actual author or editor name. ([//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Lockheed_Martin_F-16V_Viper&action=edit&minor=minor&summary=Fixing+reference+error+raised+by+%5B%5BUser%3AQwerfjkl%20(bot)%7CQwerfjkl%20(bot)%5D%5D Fix] | [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&preload=User:Qwerfjkl%20(bot)/helpform&preloadtitle=Referencing%20errors%20on%20%5B%5BSpecial%3ADiff%2F1340531758%7CLockheed%20Martin%20F-16V%20Viper%5D%5D Ask for help])

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive ↗, you can [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:Qwerfjkl/Botpreload&editintro=User:Qwerfjkl/Boteditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:Qwerfjkl&preloadtitle=Qwerfjkl%20(bot)%20–%20Nafis_Fuad_Ayon&section=new&preloadparams%5b%5d={{FULLPAGENAMEE:Lockheed Martin F-16V Viper}}&preloadparams%5b%5d=1340531758 report it to my operator].
Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 06:24, 26 February 2026 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 28

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Naval weaponry of the People's Liberation Army Navy ↗, a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Diplomat ↗ was added.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 10:12, 28 February 2026 (UTC)

2026 Iran war ↗

At this article you have repeatedly added a separate <nowiki>{{flagicon|Bangladesh}}</nowiki> with 2 deaths in the infobox. Please note that these are already covered under the Bahrain and UAE deaths with explanatory footnote ↗s detailing the same. Your addition as such is simply incorrect and duplicates the casualty count. Please do not reinsert this again. Gotitbro (talk) 07:42, 5 March 2026 (UTC)

March 2026

You need to do a better job identifying reliable sources; this seems to be a recurring issue with you.

Just looking at your recent Istanbul-class frigate ↗ edits:

seaforces.org does not indicate ''who'' the site's or articles' contributors are, or gives any indication of ''why'' they should be considered authorative. Claiming that they get info from official websites is insufficient.

globaldefensecorp.com is the same thing. No name author, no name editors.

Also, remember to ''add the source's author(s)'' to citations. The identity of the publisher ''and'' the author are both contributing factors to reliability. Identifying the author should also remind you to check if the ''author'' is reputable. Publishers where this is important include ''Naval News''. - RovingPersonalityConstruct (talk, contribs ↗) 14:16, 16 March 2026 (UTC)

Another reminder to ''add the name of the author to citations''. Also, please use less verbose reference names. For example, see: Special:Diff/1344456421 ↗. - RovingPersonalityConstruct (talk, contribs ↗) 15:42, 20 March 2026 (UTC)

:{{User|RovingPersonalityConstruct}} Thank you for your suggestions.Nafis Fuad Ayon (talk) 16:22, 20 March 2026 (UTC)

Another reminder to ''add the name of the author to citations'' and to use less verbose ref names, since you did not do so in your edit here ↗.

Also, for the MSN source, use the "agency" field of the {{tlx|cite web}} to indicate that MSN is just republishing it from The Manila Times.

Also, just add new entries to the ship list table. That's what the table is there for. - RovingPersonalityConstruct (talk, contribs ↗) 18:53, 22 March 2026 (UTC)

:::{{User|RovingPersonalityConstruct}} Thank you for your suggestion. I have spent a lot of time to find that information. Ten Type-052D destroyers were commissioned in two years, but no user but me actually added them in Wikipedia. I will improve them too. I hope you are also going to improve those articles.
:Nafis Fuad Ayon (talk) 20:57, 22 March 2026 (UTC)

You can, of course, change the values in the list table, provided that you add appropriate sources that verify the values. The bottom line is that the list is generally unsupported by sources, and that many articles that normally might support it are badly/poorly sourced and so don't help.

It is the responsibility of editors to ensure that their additions are supported and verified by sources (WP:VERIFY ↗). It can be ''brought up to date'' later, or even by you. - RovingPersonalityConstruct (talk, contribs ↗) 06:09, 23 March 2026 (UTC)

CS1 error on H/PJ-87 100 mm naval gun ↗

25px|alt=|link= ↗ Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have '''automatically detected''' that this edit ↗ performed by you, on the page :H/PJ-87 100 mm naval gun ↗, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A dates ↗ error. References show this error when one of the date-containing parameters is incorrectly formatted. Please edit the article to correct the date and ensure it is formatted to follow the Wikipedia Manual of Style's guidance on dates ↗. ([//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=H/PJ-87_100_mm_naval_gun&action=edit&minor=minor&summary=Fixing+reference+error+raised+by+%5B%5BUser%3AQwerfjkl%20(bot)%7CQwerfjkl%20(bot)%5D%5D Fix] | [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&preload=User:Qwerfjkl%20(bot)/helpform&preloadtitle=Referencing%20errors%20on%20%5B%5BSpecial%3ADiff%2F1344417803%7CH/PJ-87%20100%20mm%20naval%20gun%5D%5D Ask for help])

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive ↗, you can [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:Qwerfjkl/Botpreload&editintro=User:Qwerfjkl/Boteditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:Qwerfjkl&preloadtitle=Qwerfjkl%20(bot)%20–%20Nafis_Fuad_Ayon&section=new&preloadparams%5b%5d={{FULLPAGENAMEE:H/PJ-87 100 mm naval gun}}&preloadparams%5b%5d=1344417803 report it to my operator].
Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 09:56, 20 March 2026 (UTC)

April 2026

25px|alt=Information icon ↗ Hello, I'm .nhals8. I noticed that you recently removed content ↗ without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary ↗. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page ↗. Thanks. '''nhals8''' (rats in the house of the dead) 09:30, 3 April 2026 (UTC)

::: {{User|.nhals8}} Those ship classes need seperate new articles.Nafis Fuad Ayon (talk) 09:36, 3 April 2026 (UTC)

CS1 error on Landing Ship, Tank ↗

25px|alt=|link= ↗ Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have '''automatically detected''' that this edit ↗ performed by you, on the page :Landing Ship, Tank ↗, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A generic name ↗ error. References show this error when author or editor name parameters use place-holder names. Please edit the article to include the source's actual author or editor name. ([//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Landing_Ship,_Tank&action=edit&minor=minor&summary=Fixing+reference+error+raised+by+%5B%5BUser%3AQwerfjkl%20(bot)%7CQwerfjkl%20(bot)%5D%5D Fix] | [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&preload=User:Qwerfjkl%20(bot)/helpform&preloadtitle=Referencing%20errors%20on%20%5B%5BSpecial%3ADiff%2F1346920608%7CLanding%20Ship,%20Tank%5D%5D Ask for help])

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive ↗, you can [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:Qwerfjkl/Botpreload&editintro=User:Qwerfjkl/Boteditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:Qwerfjkl&preloadtitle=Qwerfjkl%20(bot)%20–%20Nafis_Fuad_Ayon&section=new&preloadparams%5b%5d={{FULLPAGENAMEE:Landing Ship, Tank}}&preloadparams%5b%5d=1346920608 report it to my operator].
Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 17:46, 3 April 2026 (UTC)

WP:AN/I discussion notice

link=|25px|alt=Information icon ↗ There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents ↗ regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is User:Nafis Fuad Ayon and WP:SYNTH ↗. ZLEA TǀC ↗ 04:34, 8 May 2026 (UTC)

::: I checked it.Nafis Fuad Ayon (talk) 04:48, 8 May 2026 (UTC)

References and sources

Looking at Special:Diff/1354081496 ↗ and your creation of M60T tank ↗:

You must add the name of the ''author'' (like the name of the ''person'' or ''organization'') to references when they are different from name of publisher. Reliability may depend on ''both'' (reliable author and publisher.) For example, in your edit to the Type 052B destroyer, a bunch of the references indicate the ''publisher'' but not the ''author''. I am skeptical whether the authors can be deemed reliable in most of those cases.

Be mindful of WP:INTEGRITY ↗. In multiple cases, you have four references attached to a segment. This would mean that you are saying that each reference can be used to verify ''everything'' in the segment. Assign references as specifically as possible. It will also avoid veering into WP:OVERCITE ↗.

As a further note on reliable sources, your desire to add multiple sources is leading to the use of ''unreliable'' sources. In the case of the M60T article, the ones that immediately come to mind are Army Technology, Global Security, Tank Encyclopedia, Tank and AFV News.

It's rather surprising for these sort of things to be happening from a editor with 16000+ edits over six years. And I get the feeling that a great many of your edits have been like this. - RovingPersonalityConstruct (talk, contribs ↗) 16:42, 17 May 2026 (UTC)

:: I will improve it in two to three days. I always add archived links when create a reference. I always do my best. I have added 50+ references with archived links to create the M60T tank article. I will replace Army Technology, Global Security, Tank Encyclopedia, Tank and AFV News with Wikipedia acceptable sources from M60T tank article (or remove the information if there is no source). I was unaware those websites are blacklisted in Wikipedia. I typically rely on weapon manufacturers' official websites to add technical specifications to Wikipedia. My only problem is finding sources for Chinese weapons, as many Chinese media outlets are blocked on Wikipedia.Nafis Fuad Ayon (talk) 19:20, 17 May 2026 (UTC)
:RovingPersonalityConstruct ↗ I invite you to improve those articles with me.Nafis Fuad Ayon (talk) 18:27, 17 May 2026 (UTC)
::::RovingPersonalityConstruct ↗, Type 052B destroyer ↗s upgraded with 32 VLS and YJ-12 missiles. I am asking you to add this information to the Type 052B destroyer article. Let's improve Wikipedia articles together.Nafis Fuad Ayon (talk) 18:35, 17 May 2026 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 6

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.
:Naval weaponry of the People's Liberation Army Navy ↗
::added a link pointing to The Diplomat ↗
:Type 071 amphibious transport dock ↗
::added a link pointing to The Diplomat ↗

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 10:21, 6 June 2026 (UTC)

June 2026

25px|alt=Information icon ↗ Hello, you recently edited a maintenance template ↗ on the page :Bayraktar Kızılelma ↗. When removing or editing a maintenance template ↗, please either ensure that the problem that the template refers to has been resolved, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary ↗.

Your edit summary suggests you do not understand MOS:PUFFERY ↗, "facts are not puffery" is an invalid reason as MOS:PUFFERY ↗ has nothing to do with the factually of an article but rather the way it is written and presented. Please familiarize yourself with WP:WTRMT ↗ and MOS:PUFFERY ↗ before you edit/remove further maintenance templates. I have restored the maintenance template to its original state.

Please be aware that re-doing your edit to the maintenance template is considered edit warring ↗ and may result in you being blocked ↗.

«ΤΞΔ» 🏳️‍⚧️ TRANS RIGHTS ARE HUMAN RIGHTS - Please tag me (Tea Of Size Class) when you reply to me or I wont see it! (talk) 01:59, 24 June 2026 (UTC)