User Talk: Oudomo
Server-side rendered snapshot of this editor's Wikipedia talk page discussions.
Welcome!
<div class="MainPageBG" style="border:1px solid lightgrey; vertical-align:top; color:#000000;">
{| style="width: 100%; vertical-align:top;"
! <div style="margin:0; font-family:sans-serif; font-weight:normal; border:1px solid lightgrey; text-align:left; padding-left:0.4em; padding-top:0.2em; padding-bottom:0.2em;">Hello, Oudomo! '''Welcome to Wikipedia!''' Thank you for your contributions ↗. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place '''<code>{{helpme}}</code>''' on your talk page ↗ and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name ↗ on talk pages by clicking 22px|link=Wikipedia:How to sign your posts|alt= ↗ or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted ↗" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject ↗ to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here ↗ for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary ↗ field when making edits to pages.</div>
|}
{| style="width:100%; font-size:85%;"
|class="MainPageBG" style="width: 55%; border:1px solid white; background-color:lightgrey; vertical-align:top"|
{| style="width: 100%; vertical-align:top; background-color:Lavender"
! <div style="margin: 0; background-color:white; font-family: sans-serif; font-size:120%; font-weight:bold; border:1px solid lightgrey; text-align:left; color:grey; padding-left:0.4em; padding-top: 0.2em; padding-bottom: 0.2em;">Getting Started</div>
|-
|
- '''Introduction ↗''' • Contributing to Wikipedia ↗ • Your first article ↗
- The five pillars of Wikipedia ↗ • Simplified ruleset ↗
- How to: edit a page ↗ • upload an image ↗
! <div style="margin: 0; background:white; font-family: sans-serif; font-size:120%; font-weight:bold; border:1px solid lightgrey; text-align:left; color:grey; padding-left:0.4em; padding-top: 0.2em; padding-bottom: 0.2em;">Getting Help</div>
|-
|
- '''Get help at the Teahouse ↗'''
- Frequently Asked Questions ↗
- Where to ask questions ↗
- Department directory ↗
- Request administrator attention ↗
|-
! <div style="margin: 0; background:white; font-family: sans-serif; font-size:120%; font-weight:bold; border:1px solid lightgrey; text-align:left; color:grey; padding-left:0.4em; padding-top: 0.2em; padding-bottom: 0.2em;">Policies and Guidelines</div>
|-
|
- Neutral point of view ↗ • Verifiability ↗ • No original research ↗
- Reliable sources ↗ • Citing sources ↗ • Content guidelines ↗
- What Wikipedia is not ↗ • Biographies of living persons ↗
- Manual of Style ↗ (Simplified ↗) • Three-revert rule ↗
- '''Copyrights ↗''' • Non-free content ↗ • Image use policy ↗
- External links ↗ • Spam ↗ • Vandalism ↗ • Sockpuppetry ↗
- Deletion policy ↗ • Conflict of interest ↗ • Notability ↗
|}
|class="MainPageBG" style="width: 55%; border:1px solid lightgrey; background-color:Seashell; vertical-align:top"|
{| style="width: 100%; vertical-align:top; background-color:Seashell"
! <div style="margin: 0; background-color:white; font-family: sans-serif; font-size:120%; font-weight:bold; border:1px solid lightgrey; text-align:left; color:grey; padding-left:0.4em; padding-top: 0.2em; padding-bottom: 0.2em;">The Community</div>
|-
|
- '''Community Portal ↗''' • Adopt-a-user program ↗
- Assume good faith ↗ • Civility ↗ • Etiquette ↗
- No personal attacks ↗ • Resolving disputes ↗
- Build consensus ↗ • Village pump ↗
- Discord server ↗ • IRC channels ↗ • Mailing lists ↗
- ''The Signpost'' (Wikipedia's newspaper) ↗
! <div style="margin: 0; background-color:white; font-family: sans-serif; font-size:120%; font-weight:bold; border:1px solid lightgrey; text-align:left; color:grey; padding-left:0.4em; padding-top: 0.2em; padding-bottom: 0.2em;">Things to do</div>
|-
|
- '''Task Center ↗''' • Be bold in editing ↗
- Maintenance ↗ • Peer review ↗ • Requested articles ↗
- Join a WikiProject ↗ • Translating articles ↗
- Cleaning up: General ↗ • Copy editing ↗ • Vandalism ↗
! <div style="margin: 0; background-color:white; font-family: sans-serif; font-size:120%; font-weight:bold; border:1px solid lightgrey; text-align:left; color:grey; padding-left:0.4em; padding-top: 0.2em; padding-bottom: 0.2em;">Miscellaneous</div>
|-
|
- Categories ↗ • Disambiguation ↗ • Stubs ↗
- User pages ↗ • Talk pages ↗
- Useful templates ↗ • Tools ↗ • User scripts ↗
|}
</div>
Happy editing! Peaceray (talk) 20:32, 15 July 2024 (UTC)<!--Template:WelcomeMenu-->
Notice of Discussion at Talk:2024 United States presidential election#Remove RealClearPolitics from polling. ↗
Hi Oudomo. I have noticed that you have made edits to polling aggregates, and so I want to bring this discussion up to your attention. If you have any thoughts about this, regardless of your position, I encourage you to make a comment there. CountyCountry (talk) 17:56, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
:Alright, thanks. It's fine if you remove RCP. Oudomo (talk) 18:24, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
::Just to be clear, I’m not the one who created the discussion but I participated in it. If you can, please make a comment in that discussion thread. CountyCountry (talk) 19:49, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
:::Got it, is required though? Oudomo (talk) 19:51, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
::::Not required to comment. I just saw that you edited the polling aggregates before and I felt that you might be interested in the discussion. CountyCountry (talk) 20:04, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
:::::Just left a comment there, if Wikipedia removes RCP, that's fine. I'll focus on watching and editing other polling averages.
:::::You have a nice day :) Oudomo (talk) 20:11, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
Why...
...do you seem so happy ↗ that Trump wins WV? This is a legitimate question. '''''<span style="font-family:default;color:#246BCE;">Liliana</span><span style="font-family:Comic Sans MS;color:#FF1493;">UwU</span>''''' <sup>(talk / contributions ↗)</sup> 00:37, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
:whenever the news is big, i usually report it with all caps. Oudomo (talk) 00:38, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
::Oh. Sorry for the weird question. '''''<span style="font-family:default;color:#246BCE;">Liliana</span><span style="font-family:Comic Sans MS;color:#FF1493;">UwU</span>''''' <sup>(talk / contributions ↗)</sup> 00:43, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
Edit war warning
You already reverted my edit in the infobox. Please note if you do another revert within 24 hours, you will be in violation of WP:1RR ↗. We had an RfC, and we only add EVs when all 5 major sources project a state. Prcc27 (talk) 01:43, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
:Dude, I get it, all networks have been all over the place.
:But got it, apologies. Oudomo (talk) 01:50, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message
<div class="ivmbox " style="margin-bottom: 1em; border: 1px solid #a2a9b1; background-color: #fdf2d5; padding: 0.5em; display: flex; align-items: center; ">
<div class="ivmbox-image noresize" style="padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em;">40px ↗</div>
<div class="ivmbox-text">
Hello! Voting in the '''2024 Arbitration Committee elections ↗''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2024|end}}-1 day}}. All '''eligible users ↗''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee ↗ is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process ↗. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans ↗, topic bans ↗, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy ↗ describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates ↗ and submit your choices on the '''2024|poll}}|voting page ↗'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. <small>MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:55, 19 November 2024 (UTC)</small>
</div>
</div>
<!-- Message sent by User:Cyberpower678@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2024/Coordination/MM/09&oldid=1258243804 -->
Disambiguation link notification for December 17
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited New Jersey ↗, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Andy Kim ↗. Such links are usually incorrect ↗, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. <small>(Read the FAQ{{*}} Join us at the DPL WikiProject ↗.)</small>
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 19:56, 17 December 2024 (UTC)
Jimmy Carter
RIP Jimmy Carter. Anthonyt31201 (talk) 00:40, 30 December 2024 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
{| style="border: 1px solid gray; background-color: #fdffe7;"
|rowspan="2" style="vertical-align:middle;" | 100px ↗
|rowspan="2" |
|style="font-size: x-large; padding: 0; vertical-align: middle; height: 1.1em;" | '''The Death Barnstar'''
|-
|style="vertical-align: middle; border-top: 1px solid gray;" | For being the one to change ↗ "is" to "was" at Jimmy Carter ↗ when he died. ~{{Smallcaps|Darth Stabro}}<sup>Talk ↗{{nbsp}}•{{nbsp}}Contribs ↗</sup> 00:57, 30 December 2024 (UTC)
|}
January 2025
25px|alt=Information icon ↗ Hi Oudomo! I noticed that you have reverted to restore your preferred version of :United States Congress ↗ several times. The impulse to undo an edit you disagree with is understandable, but I wanted to make sure you're aware that the edit warring policy ↗ disallows repeated reversions even if they are justifiable.
All editors are expected to discuss content disputes on article talk pages ↗ to try to reach consensus ↗. If you are unable to agree at {{TALKPAGENAME:United States Congress}} ↗, please use one of the dispute resolution options ↗ to seek input from others. Using this approach instead of reverting can help you avoid getting drawn into an edit war. Thank you.<!-- Template:uw-ewsoft --> – Muboshgu (talk) 16:42, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
:alright, got it, thanks. timing is being rushed. Oudomo (talk) 16:44, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
February 2025
25px|alt=Information icon ↗ Hello, I'm David O. Johnson. It would be helpful if you included a link to the sources you mention when you edit articles, such as the 2026 United States Senate election in Minnesota ↗ article, rather than referencing them in your edit summaries. It makes the information easier to verify. Thanks, David O. Johnson (talk) 21:50, 18 February 2025 (UTC)
:Yes, well there was a message from McCollum’s spokesperson named Luke Bishop. He told the National Journal Hotline that McCollum declined to run. I checked and so far as of this time, there has been no articles being written about this news. It’s fine if you reverted my edits for now until another or multiple source confirms. Thanks! Oudomo (talk) 21:57, 18 February 2025 (UTC)
March 2025
30px|link= ↗ You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war ↗  according to the reverts you have made on :2025 Donald Trump speech to a joint session of Congress ↗. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate ↗ with others, to avoid editing disruptively ↗, and to try to reach a consensus ↗, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Points to note:
# '''Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;'''
# '''Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.'''
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page ↗ to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard ↗ or seek dispute resolution ↗. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection ↗. If you engage in an edit war, you '''may be blocked ↗ from editing.''' <!-- Template:uw-ew --> Feeglgeef (talk) 03:10, 5 March 2025 (UTC)
:Can you not revert my edits? I understand that you are trying to show me the Wikipedia Not News policy, but the speech is right now. If you could go back to the 2024 SOTU address page, it was "currently addressing" when Biden delivered a speech. Oudomo (talk) 03:12, 5 March 2025 (UTC)
::It shouldn't have, and it shouldn't and doesn't need to be updated. Wikipedia isn't supposed to tell you what is happening right now, there are many other services to do that. We remain focused on creating an encyclopedia. Feeglgeef (talk) 03:16, 5 March 2025 (UTC)
:::Well, lots of people are doing it. It should match and Wikipedia needs to be accurate. Upcoming right now is irrelevant. Some people might come to the page right now. Oudomo (talk) 03:17, 5 March 2025 (UTC)
::::And those people are ''wrong'' to seek news from an encyclopedia. Feeglgeef (talk) 03:25, 5 March 2025 (UTC)
:::::Well, if come they come to the page right now, it says "will deliver", when clearly Trump is delivering it right now? Oudomo (talk) 03:26, 5 March 2025 (UTC)
::::::Again, Wikipedia is not the place to check if the state of the union is running, we are not a news site. Feeglgeef (talk) 04:17, 5 March 2025 (UTC)
:::::::But people change statuses on Wikipedia pages all the time whenever an event is starting, happening, or ending. I'm not the only editor who does this. Oudomo (talk) 04:22, 5 March 2025 (UTC)
Recent edit
Hi,
I noticed you updated a reference on the 2026 United States Senate election in Michigan ↗ article, but you left the old ref name info intact, so a number of refs mistakenly had the newer ref cited. I've gone ahead and removed the ref name info from the new ref and added it to the older, first used ref.
Thanks, David O. Johnson (talk) 18:10, 13 March 2025 (UTC)
:Alright thanks, just learning how to add a citation to Wikipedia properly, just so you know. Oudomo (talk) 18:42, 13 March 2025 (UTC)
The skibidi vandal
They are an LTA, there is no point warning them. Just fir your info. <span style="color:DarkMagenta">Knitsey</span> (<span style="color: maroon">talk</span>) 19:55, 18 May 2025 (UTC)
:Ye ik, I just want to mess around with him for a bit if that's fine Oudomo (talk) 19:56, 18 May 2025 (UTC)
::Honestly, I wouldn't bother as it just encourages them. Wikipedia:Revert, block, ignore ↗, but, that's up to you. <span style="color:DarkMagenta">Knitsey</span> (<span style="color: maroon">talk</span>) 19:58, 18 May 2025 (UTC)
:::Eh, encouraging means it could speed up the process of having them blocked from editing. That's my point. Anyway, have a good day! Oudomo (talk) 19:59, 18 May 2025 (UTC)
2025 Virginia's 11th congressional district special election ↗ moved to draftspace
Thanks for your contributions to 2025 Virginia's 11th congressional district special election ↗. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because '''it has no sources'''.
I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.
Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page ↗.
When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. <span style="color:blue; text-shadow:#0080FF 0.2em 0.2em 0.2em;">harrz</span> <small><sup><span style="color:blue; text-shadow:#0080FF 0.1em 0.1em 0.1em;"><i>talk</i></span> ↗</sup></small> 13:40, 21 May 2025 (UTC)
:I plan on publishing the article maybe tomorrow or something but yeah it is reasonable. Just wait for more sources to come about plans to have the by-election scheduled and set up. Oudomo (talk) 13:42, 21 May 2025 (UTC)
ITN recognition for Harrison Ruffin Tyler ↗
{{ivmbox
|1=On 1 June 2025, '''''In the news ↗''''' was updated with an item that involved the article '''''Harrison Ruffin Tyler ↗''''', which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page ↗. Stephen 02:02, 1 June 2025 (UTC)
|2={{Ambox globe current red}}
|imagesize=50px
}}
September 2025
Please stop with the unsourced live-event updates to articles. Seasider53 (talk) 17:09, 9 September 2025 (UTC)
:I know it's unsourced, but I want to create them ahead of time, if I broke any Wikipedia rules, apologies. Oudomo (talk) 17:12, 9 September 2025 (UTC)
::I especially like how you asked people not to do something, but then did it in another article. Seasider53 (talk) 17:13, 9 September 2025 (UTC)
:::Don't be harsh, it's my mistake. Oudomo (talk) 17:16, 9 September 2025 (UTC)
::::Second and final warning. Seasider53 (talk) 17:20, 9 September 2025 (UTC)
:::::is it fine if I add these after the event when the news sources come out? Oudomo (talk) 17:23, 9 September 2025 (UTC)
25px|alt=Information icon ↗ Please do not add or change content, as you did at :IPhone 15 ↗, without citing a reliable source ↗. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources ↗ to see how to add references to an article. Thank you.<!-- Template:uw-unsourced2 --> Seasider53 (talk) 18:19, 9 September 2025 (UTC)
:I'm going to add the source soon, I'm not the only one who's adding the iPhone discontinued info, there is also another user adding the discontinued date. Oudomo (talk) 18:21, 9 September 2025 (UTC)
::We don't add that kind of information without an accompanying source. Seasider53 (talk) 18:34, 9 September 2025 (UTC)
Proposed deletion ↗ of :IPhone 17 Pro ↗
left|link=|alt=Notice|48px| ↗
The article :IPhone 17 Pro ↗ has been proposed for deletion ↗ because of the following concern:
<blockquote>'''Wikipedia is not a crystal ball ↗. It is simply too soon for this article; the product hasn't been released yet. Unsourced.'''</blockquote>
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons ↗.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary ↗ or on the article's talk page ↗.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process ↗, but other deletion process ↗es exist. In particular, the speedy deletion ↗ process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion ↗ allows discussion to reach consensus ↗ for deletion.<!-- Template:Proposed deletion notify --> <span style="background: linear-gradient(90deg, #800080, #444444); -webkit-background-clip: text; color: transparent;"> '''veko.'''</span> (user | talk | contribs ↗) 17:12, 9 September 2025 (UTC)
IPhone 17 Pro ↗ moved to draftspace
Thanks for your contributions to IPhone 17 Pro ↗. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because '''it has no sources''' and '''article creator seems to be OK with drafting to the article Wikipedia is not a crystal ball ↗. It is too soon for the article; the product hasn't even been announced yet. (discarding the PROD)'''.
I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.
Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page ↗.
When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. <span style="background: linear-gradient(90deg, #800080, #444444); -webkit-background-clip: text; color: transparent;"> '''veko.'''</span> (user | talk | contribs ↗) 17:26, 9 September 2025 (UTC)
November 2025
25px|alt=Information icon ↗ Hello, I'm Qwerty123M. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, :2025 California Proposition 50 ↗, but you didn't provide a reliable source ↗. On Wikipedia, it's important that article content be verifiable ↗. If you'd like to resubmit your change with a citation ↗, your edit is archived in the page history ↗. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. <!-- Template:uw-unsourced1 --> Qwerty123M (talk) 04:07, 5 November 2025 (UTC)
ArbCom 2025 Elections voter message
<div class="ivmbox " style="margin-bottom: 1em; border: 1px solid #a2a9b1; background-color: #fdf2d5; padding: 0.5em; display: flex; align-items: center; ">
<div class="ivmbox-image" style="padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em;flex-basis: 40px">40px ↗</div>
<div class="ivmbox-text">
Hello! Voting in the '''2025 Arbitration Committee elections ↗''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2025|end}}-1 day}}. All '''eligible users ↗''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee ↗ is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process ↗. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans ↗, topic bans ↗, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy ↗ describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please review the candidates ↗ and submit your choices on the '''2025|poll}}|voting page ↗'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. <small>MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:59, 18 November 2025 (UTC)</small>
</div>
</div>
<!-- Message sent by User:Cyberpower678@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2025/Coordination/MM/08&oldid=1322758940 -->
Disambiguation link notification for January 5
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2026 Minnesota gubernatorial election ↗, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Fox 9 ↗.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:56, 5 January 2026 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for January 22
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Lynne Walz ↗, a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Hill ↗ was added.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:54, 22 January 2026 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
{| style="background-color: var(--background-color-success-subtle, #fdffe7); border: 1px solid var(--border-color-success, #fceb92); color: var(--color-base, #202122);"
|rowspan="2" style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 5px;" | 100px ↗
|style="font-size: x-large; padding: 3px 3px 0 3px; height: 1.5em;" | '''The Teamwork Barnstar'''
|-
|style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;" | Thanks for your help in reigning in the early race calls in 2026 New Jersey's 11th congressional district special election ↗. Happy editing! Ahuman00 (talk) 03:25, 6 February 2026 (UTC)
|}
Decision desk HQ
I noticed you undid your edit on Malinowski's perceived victory. I appreciate that. In the future, please do not use DDHQ for race calls. It has made repeated mistakes, as its goal is to make calls first and hopefully accurately, which is not what calling races has traditionally been about. Also, if your edit is retracted, as it was here, it's good policy to discuss potential changes on the talk page, instead of reverting the edit. Thanks! <span style="background:linear-gradient(#C2D,#f8c);color:#000"><b>Ezra Fox🦊</b></span><span style="color:#529"> • </span><span style="text-shadow:2px 2px 2px #000;color:#f9f"><b>(talk)</b></span> 03:40, 6 February 2026 (UTC)
:Yes, is Wikipedia no longer considering DDHQ as a reliable source in calling election races now? Oudomo (talk) 03:50, 6 February 2026 (UTC)
::For a list of what the community considers reliable, you can use WP:RSPSOURCES ↗. I do not see DDHQ on here. I will ask about it. Generally, Wikipedia has a high bar for accuracy. Race calls do not decide the winner. More broadly, I would recommend following the WP:BRD ↗ guideline. There are different variations. But in this case, the policy as described by WP:BRR ↗ does not appear to have been followed. I've in the past reverted someone's revert and it didn't go well for me lol. <span style="background:linear-gradient(#C2D,#f8c);color:#000"><b>Ezra Fox🦊</b></span><span style="color:#529"> • </span><span style="text-shadow:2px 2px 2px #000;color:#f9f"><b>(talk)</b></span> 04:43, 6 February 2026 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for April 14
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2026 United States House of Representatives elections in California ↗, a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bloomberg ↗ was added.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 14 April 2026 (UTC)
I want to resolve this
Hey man, I wanna work this out. In short, why say Crystal Rhoades is the nominee on the page if you say Powell was victorious? I want to be civil, but I'm confused as of now. Hopefully we can work it out. CREditzWiki (yap ↗) | (things i apparently did ↗) 04:14, 13 May 2026 (UTC)
:Apologies, just looked at the results. I got confused with Powell and Rhoades. It's my fault and I'm sorry, you won the argument dw. My mind is overwhelming. Oudomo (talk) 04:16, 13 May 2026 (UTC)
::It's alright man. We all make mistakes, and I'm glad we were able to figure it out as quickly as we did. CREditzWiki (yap ↗) | (things i apparently did ↗) 04:17, 13 May 2026 (UTC)
:::Yeah it's fine. You can look through my talk page if you like, it's filled with all the mistakes I've done in the past like this one. Thanks for pointing out my flaws, you're a great editor! Oudomo (talk) 04:19, 13 May 2026 (UTC)
Jumping the gun
Please stop looking at one source (particularly DDHQ and VoteHub) and making a quick decision on election pages. VoteHub have been the only source to label Becerra as a candidate in the top-two, and you are aware that 5 reliable sources are needed. This has, as I learnt from some of the above messages, been a chronic issue. Why? aesurias <small>''(ping me in your reply, or I won't see it)'' (talk)</small> 03:22, 4 June 2026 (UTC)
:DDHQ and VoteHub aren’t my primary sources. I also follow NBC and AP. Although I do apologize for the edit I made for California governor, I’m not the only one doing it. Literally other editors like Scribetastic just make edit projections to other races whenever there’s only one source declaring it. That’s why I just follow his lead. Some other editors like IPs have also continued to ignore these warnings. Oudomo (talk) 04:48, 4 June 2026 (UTC)
::So, you knew that NBC and AP didn't call for Becerra (they still haven't), but you saw someone else doing something similar so you decided to ignore the 2 more reliable sources and follow VoteHub? aesurias <small>''(ping me in your reply, or I won't see it)'' (talk)</small> 04:49, 4 June 2026 (UTC)
:::Yes. What do you want me to do about it? Should I just be the one that look out for other editors in case if they do something like I did MANY times? Oudomo (talk) 04:54, 4 June 2026 (UTC)
::::Oh and I forgot to mention/ping your name. I just want this conversation to ressolve QUICKLY, apologies lol aesurias Oudomo (talk) 05:04, 4 June 2026 (UTC)
::::I'm just trying to understand your thought process here:
::::*You know there is a rule for minimum sourcing that exists,
::::*You watch all the sources,
::::*All bar one have not called for Becerra,
::::*You completely disregard the rule and the majority of sources and add Becerra to the infobox,
::::*You justify this using the "someone else also did something bad" argument.
::::Someone else's wrong doesn't make your wrong any better. The solution here is either wait until you have the amount of sources required, or propose that 5 be lowered to 2 or 3. You can't just keep pretending the rule doesn't exist when it inconveniences an edit. aesurias <small>''(ping me in your reply, or I won't see it)'' (talk)</small> 05:05, 4 June 2026 (UTC)
:::::Look, I'll try my best to follow the 5-source rule, AGAIN. I will take full responsibility on this one. But I'm still going to point out the issue that other editors continue to ignore the rule. We've been through with this before (particularly the TN-7 special election) and I all want of this to end. My main issue is that the 2 to 3 or 5-source rule isn't being well-informed to other editors, this caused peer-pressure within myself that I continue to break this rule. aesurias Oudomo (talk) 05:21, 4 June 2026 (UTC)
MacOS Page move
25px|alt=Information icon ↗ Hi, and thank you for your contributions ↗ to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to change the title of :Draft:macOS Golden Gate ↗ by cutting its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into :MacOS Golden Gate ↗. This is known as a "cut-and-paste move ↗", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history ↗, which is legally required for attribution ↗. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be ''moved'' to a new title together with their edit history.
In most cases for registered users, once your account is four days old and has ten edits ↗, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab ↗ at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu ↗ for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect ↗ from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves ↗ to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Requests for history merge ↗. Thank you. <!-- Template:uw-c&pmove --> <span style="font-family:times new roman"><span style="background-color:purple; color: #7FFFD4">~ŤheŴubṂachine</span>-<span style="color:#339966">840</span><span style="color:red">≈</span></span> ● <small>'''<span style="color:#339966;font-family:times new roman">✒️</span> ↗'''</small> 18:09, 8 June 2026 (UTC)
:Yeah I'll maybe try that, thanks! Oudomo (talk) 18:12, 8 June 2026 (UTC)
Siri AI ↗ moved to draftspace
Thanks for your contributions to Siri AI ↗. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing as a live article at this time because '''it needs more sources to establish notability'''.
I have converted it to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.
Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page ↗.
When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. BangJan1999 18:27, 8 June 2026 (UTC)
:Thanks for the reminder, but I wasn't the one who created the page. Brastein was the one who did it. Oudomo (talk) 18:28, 8 June 2026 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
{| style="border: 1px solid gray; background-color: #fdffe7;"
|rowspan="2" style="vertical-align:middle;" | {{#ifeq:{{{2}}}|alt|100px ↗|100px ↗}}
|rowspan="2" |
|style="font-size: x-large; padding: 0; vertical-align: middle; height: 1.1em;" | '''The iOS Barnstar'''
|-
|style="vertical-align: middle; border-top: 1px solid gray;" | For help construct the iOS 27 ↗ & iPadOS 27 ↗ pages & macOS Golden Gate ↗. even though it was copied and pasted. Happy WWDC day and Happy editing! <span style="font-family:times new roman"><span style="background-color:purple; color: #7FFFD4">~ŤheŴubṂachine</span>-<span style="color:#339966">840</span><span style="color:red">≈</span></span> ● <small>'''<span style="color:#339966;font-family:times new roman">✒️</span> ↗'''</small> 00:51, 9 June 2026 (UTC)
|}
:Thanks man! And I appreciate you contributing alongside me today! Sorry for the copying and pasting stuff that I “maybe” did today. Happy WWDC week! Maybe we could do it again next year 🤔 Oudomo (talk) 00:53, 9 June 2026 (UTC)
June 2026
25px|alt=Information icon ↗ Thank you for your contributions ↗ to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved content from :Draft:MacOS Golden Gate ↗ into another page. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content (here or elsewhere), Wikipedia's licensing ↗ requires that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s).{{pb}} When copying within Wikipedia, at a minimum, give attribution in an edit summary ↗ at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking ↗ to the copied page, e.g., <code>copied content from <nowiki>page name ↗</nowiki>; see that page's history for attribution</code>. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{tl|copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination.{{pb}} Please add attribution if no one has done so yet. If you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia ↗. ''Note: I have provided the attribution. Please keep this in mind in the future.'' <!-- Template:uw-copying --> Whpq (talk) 17:59, 13 June 2026 (UTC)
Source
Okay, but with a BLP the source should be provided first, not last. 331dot (talk) 00:24, 9 July 2026 (UTC)
:Ok cool your jets lol, I already got the source provided, was about to publish it but some user edited it already. I'll put it up right now. Oudomo (talk) 00:25, 9 July 2026 (UTC)
3RR Reminder
Hi,
Regarding your recent edits on the 2026 United States Senate election in Maine ↗ article, please look over WP:3RR ↗. Thanks, 12:46, 9 July 2026 (UTC) David O. Johnson (talk) 12:46, 9 July 2026 (UTC)