W
Active Editors
Back to Profile

User Talk: Uhtregorn

Server-side rendered snapshot of this editor's Wikipedia talk page discussions.

Uhtregorn, you are invited to the Teahouse!




{| style="margin: 1em 4em;"
|- valign="top"
| alt=Teahouse logo|link=w:en:WP:Teahouse|File:WP teahouse logo 2.png by User:Heatherawalls, licensed under CC BY-SA 3.0 ↗
| <div style="background-color:#f4f3f0; color: #393D38; padding: 0.4em 1em;border-radius:10px; font-size: 1.1em;">
Hi '''Uhtregorn'''! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. <br />Be our guest at the Teahouse ↗! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like {{noping|Samwalton9}} (talk ↗).

<div class="submit ui-button ui-widget ui-state-default ui-corner-all ui-button-text-only" role="button" aria-disabled="false" style="float: left;"><span class="ui-button-text">Visit the Teahouse ↗</span></div>

<div style="text-align:right;">We hope to see you there!

<small>Delivered by {{noping|HostBot}} on behalf of the Teahouse hosts ↗</small>

<small>22:04, 13 June 2017 (UTC)</small></div>
</div>
|}
Category:Wikipedians who have received a Teahouse invitation ↗<!-- Template:Teahouse_HostBot_Invitation -->

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!



{{Wikipedia:Teahouse/Teahouse talkback|WP:Teahouse|Edit summaries|ts=DES <sup>(talk)</sup><sub>DESiegel Contribs</sub> ↗ 15:46, 8 July 2017 (UTC)}}

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!



{{Wikipedia:Teahouse/Teahouse talkback|WP:Teahouse|Question on reliable sources and news opinion pieces|ts=DES <sup>(talk)</sup><sub>DESiegel Contribs</sub> ↗ 15:53, 8 July 2017 (UTC)}}

Ways to improve Bridge the Divide



Hi, I'm Babymissfortune. Uhtregorn, thanks for creating Bridge the Divide ↗!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation ↗ tools, as having some issues to fix. This page is tagged for two issues.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse ↗.

'''<sup><span style="color:#552582;">Baby</span><span style="color:#061922;">miss</span><span style="color:#FDB927;">fortune</span> ↗</sup>''' 12:25, 7 January 2018 (UTC)
:Thanks! I'll see what I can do to improve it. Uhtregorn (talk) 21:29, 8 January 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 24



Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Don Bacon (politician) ↗, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page DACA ↗ ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Don_Bacon_%28politician%29 check to confirm]&nbsp;|&nbsp;[//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Don_Bacon_%28politician%29?client=notify fix with Dab solver]). Such links are usually incorrect ↗, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. <small>(Read the FAQ{{*}} Join us at the DPL WikiProject ↗.)</small>

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:26, 24 January 2018 (UTC)

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!



{{Wikipedia:Teahouse/Teahouse talkback|WP:Teahouse|Citing Associated Press|ts='''<span style="color: red">JTP</span> <sup>(talk • contribs ↗)</sup>''' 00:13, 13 February 2018 (UTC)}}

References



Hi. Thank you for your article creations. Please see WP:CITE ↗ and consider correctly formatting the links in the reference sections of the articles you create. If you have any questions, don't hesitate to ask me me. Happy editing. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 00:57, 13 February 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of :Scott Ferguson (hedge fund manager) ↗ for deletion


<div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">48px|alt=|link= ↗</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ''':Scott Ferguson (hedge fund manager) ↗''' is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines ↗ or whether it should be deleted ↗.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Scott Ferguson (hedge fund manager) ↗ until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.<!-- Template:afd-notice --> <b style="color:#7F007F">Ritchie333</b> <sup style="color:#7F007F">(talk)</sup> <sup style="color:#7F007F">(cont)</sup> ↗ 22:21, 13 February 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 7



An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Mike Bost ↗, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Civil War ↗ ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Mike_Bost check to confirm]&nbsp;|&nbsp;[//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Mike_Bost?client=notify fix with Dab solver]).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:17, 7 March 2018 (UTC)

Far right views, islamofobia, etc



Please do not add conspiracy theories from far right sites. Thank you. Jeblad (talk) 15:55, 20 March 2018 (UTC)

Thank you


Hi Uhtregorn, and thank you for your contributions ↗! I noticed your article :Eric Scheidler ↗ and I think it’s a good candidate for Did You Know. DYK is the easiest and funnest way to get your creation on to the Main Page and in front of the eyeballs of 17 million people. Learn all about it here "DYK for Newbies ↗." I'd like to take this opportunity to invite you to join other people who enjoy editing conservatism-related articles at WikiProject Conservatism ↗! A friendly and fun place where you can can meet new colleagues and get answers ↗ to burning questions. I hope to see you there! <!-- Template:WPRYT Invite3 --> &ndash; Lionel ↗<sup>(talk ↗)</sup> 06:46, 20 May 2018 (UTC)
:Well thank you very much! I'll take a look at DYK. Uhtregorn (talk) 02:10, 21 May 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of :Bjorn Bjercke ↗ for deletion


<div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">48px|alt=|link= ↗</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ''':Bjorn Bjercke ↗''' is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines ↗ or whether it should be deleted ↗.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bjorn Bjercke ↗ until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.<!-- Template:afd-notice --> power~enwiki (<span style="color:#FA0;font-family:courier">π</span>, <span style="font-family:courier">ν</span> ↗) 06:09, 3 June 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 13



An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Jeff Denham ↗, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page John Bolton ↗ ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Jeff_Denham check to confirm]&nbsp;|&nbsp;[//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Jeff_Denham?client=notify fix with Dab solver]).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:20, 13 June 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 12



An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Mimi Walters ↗, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Paris Accords ↗ ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Mimi_Walters check to confirm]&nbsp;|&nbsp;[//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Mimi_Walters?client=notify fix with Dab solver]).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:41, 12 July 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 20



An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.
:David Valadao ↗ ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/David_Valadao check to confirm]&nbsp;|&nbsp;[//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/David_Valadao?client=notify fix with Dab solver])
::added links pointing to Central Valley ↗, Kevin McCarthy ↗ and Joe Courtney ↗
:Randy Hultgren ↗ ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Randy_Hultgren check to confirm]&nbsp;|&nbsp;[//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Randy_Hultgren?client=notify fix with Dab solver])
::added a link pointing to Andy Barr ↗

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:19, 20 July 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 27



An automated process has detected that when you recently edited David Valadao ↗, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Central Valley ↗, Kevin McCarthy ↗ and Joe Courtney ↗ ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/David_Valadao check to confirm]&nbsp;|&nbsp;[//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/David_Valadao?client=notify fix with Dab solver]).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:19, 27 July 2018 (UTC)

Citation templates



Hi, I wanted to direct you to WP:REFB ↗ and see if you're familiar with using the refToolbar. I noticed some of the citations you're adding are showing up a bit wonky (the article title isn't clickable, and the URL is showing up as bare text). Let me know if you have any questions on formatting citations, thanks. Marquardtika (talk) 21:36, 2 August 2018 (UTC)
Just saw this. Thanks for the advice.

WP:COPYVIO ↗



You seem to have introduced some WP:COPYRIGHT ↗ violations here ↗. I specifically noticed "His record on firearms legislation earned him the 'NRA lap dog' label from the Brady Campaign, a leading gun-control group' ", which is copied word-for-word from the source ↗. Please address this ASAP. Marquardtika (talk) 18:54, 31 August 2018 (UTC)
So it just needs to be in different wording?
:Right, we can't copy wording directly from sourcing. I'll leave you the COPYVIO notice below with more information. Marquardtika (talk) 14:59, 1 September 2018 (UTC)

Wikipedia and copyright


30px|link=|alt=Control copyright icon ↗ Hello Uhtregorn, and welcome to Wikipedia. All or some of your addition(s) to :Carlos Curbelo ↗ have been removed, as they appear to have added copyrighted material without evidence of permission ↗ from the copyright holder. While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues here.


It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked ↗ from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. <!--Template:uw-copyright-new--> Marquardtika (talk) 14:59, 1 September 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of :Eddie Edwards (politician) ↗ for deletion


<div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">48px|alt=|link= ↗</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ''':Eddie Edwards (politician) ↗''' is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines ↗ or whether it should be deleted ↗.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eddie Edwards (politician) ↗ until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.<!-- Template:afd notice --> Wolfson5 (talk) 18:21, 26 September 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message



{{Ivmbox|Hello, Uhtregorn. Voting in the '''2018 Arbitration Committee elections ↗''' is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee ↗ is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process ↗. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans ↗, topic bans ↗, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy ↗ describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates ↗ and submit your choices on the '''voting page ↗'''. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
|Scale of justice 2.svg|imagesize=40px}}
<!-- Message sent by User:Cyberpower678@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2018/Coordination/MMS/11&oldid=866998401 -->

Disambiguation link notification for December 18



An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Linden Blue ↗, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Anastasio Somoza ↗ ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Linden_Blue check to confirm]&nbsp;|&nbsp;[//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Linden_Blue?client=notify fix with Dab solver]).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:52, 18 December 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 31



Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited François Rebsamen ↗, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Jack Lang ↗ and Ligue communiste révolutionnaire ↗ ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Fran%C3%A7ois_Rebsamen check to confirm]&nbsp;|&nbsp;[//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Fran%C3%A7ois_Rebsamen?client=notify fix with Dab solver]). Such links are usually incorrect ↗, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. <small>(Read the FAQ{{*}} Join us at the DPL WikiProject ↗.)</small>

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:50, 31 May 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 23



An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.
:Ted Paige ↗ ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Ted_Paige check to confirm]&nbsp;|&nbsp;[//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Ted_Paige?client=notify fix with Dab solver])
::added links pointing to National Research Council ↗, Royal Naval College ↗ and Graham Marshall ↗
:Obrana národa ↗ ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Obrana_n%C3%A1roda check to confirm]&nbsp;|&nbsp;[//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Obrana_n%C3%A1roda?client=notify fix with Dab solver])
::added links pointing to Pilsen ↗ and Josef Dostál ↗

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:50, 23 July 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 30



An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ted Paige ↗, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages National Research Council ↗ and Royal Naval College ↗ ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Ted_Paige check to confirm]&nbsp;|&nbsp;[//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Ted_Paige?client=notify fix with Dab solver]).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 10:19, 30 July 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 25



An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Gabriel Urralburu ↗, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Roncal ↗ ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Gabriel_Urralburu check to confirm]&nbsp;|&nbsp;[//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Gabriel_Urralburu?client=notify fix with Dab solver]).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 13:22, 25 September 2019 (UTC)

ArbCom 2019 election voter message



<table class="messagebox " style="border: 1px solid #AAA; background: ivory; padding: 0.5em; width: 100%;">
<tr><td style="vertical-align:middle; padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em;">40px ↗</td><td>Hello! Voting in the '''2019 Arbitration Committee elections ↗''' is now open until 23:59 on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2019|end}}-1 day}}. All '''eligible users ↗''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee ↗ is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process ↗. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans ↗, topic bans ↗, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy ↗ describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates ↗ and submit your choices on the '''2019|poll}}|voting page ↗'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:21, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
</td></tr>
</table>
<!-- Message sent by User:Cyberpower678@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2019/Coordination/MMS/07&oldid=926750474 -->

Disambiguation link notification for December 1



An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Georgy Sofronov ↗, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Southern Front ↗ ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Georgy_Sofronov check to confirm]&nbsp;|&nbsp;[//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Georgy_Sofronov?client=notify fix with Dab solver]).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:35, 1 December 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 8



An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Luis Recasens ↗, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Oliver Wendell Holmes ↗ and University of Rome ↗ ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Luis_Recasens check to confirm]&nbsp;|&nbsp;[//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Luis_Recasens?client=notify fix with Dab solver]).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:19, 8 December 2019 (UTC)

Ways to improve Taghi Amirani



Hello, Uhtregorn,

Thank you for creating Taghi Amirani ↗.

I have tagged the page ↗ as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process ↗ and note that:

{{Quote|1=Thank you for your new article on Taghi Amirani, but it needs mch better sources. See WP:SIGCOV ↗ and WP:RS ↗ for guidelines on the types of sources to be used in a Wikipedia article to determine if a person is notable ↗. If this issue is not corrected, future editors could call for the article to be deleted.}}

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with <code><nowiki>{{Re|</nowiki>Doomsdayer520<nowiki>}}</nowiki></code>. And, don't forget to sign your reply with <code><nowiki>~~~~</nowiki></code>. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse ↗.

<small>Delivered via the Page Curation ↗ tool, on behalf of the reviewer.</small> <!-- Template:Taggednote-NPF -->

---<span style="font-family: Calibri"><b style="color: DarkOrchid"><small>DOOMSDAYER</small>520</b> (Talk&#124;Contribs ↗)</span> 20:38, 22 January 2020 (UTC)

Zdeněk Novák ↗ moved to draftspace



An article you recently created, Zdeněk Novák ↗, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable ↗, independent sources ↗. <small>(? ↗)</small> Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability ↗ is of central importance ↗ on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace ↗ (with a prefix of "<code>Draft:</code>" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline ↗ and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. <span style="background:Black;padding:1px 5px"><b style="color: White">b</b><b style="color: White">uidh</b><b style="color: White">e</b> ↗</span> 00:17, 8 February 2020 (UTC)
{{ping|Buidhe}} the article was still under construction. I am adding the sources now.

Proposed deletion ↗ of Dewi Meirion Lewis ↗


left|link=|alt=Notice|48px| ↗

The article Dewi Meirion Lewis ↗ has been proposed for deletion ↗ because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy ↗, this '''biography of a living person ↗''' will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source ↗ that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners ↗, or ask at the help desk ↗. Once you have provided at least one reliable source ↗, you may remove the {{tl|prod blp/dated}} tag. '''Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced.''' If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can {{#ifexist:Dewi Meirion Lewis|request that it be undeleted|request that it be undeleted ↗}} when you are ready to add one.<!-- Template:ProdwarningBLP --> <span style="color: darkgreen"> ~~ </span> <span style="color: darkgreen">Alex Noble</span> <span style="color: darkgreen">- talk</span> 20:25, 19 February 2020 (UTC)

Can you guys give me a second before you post these messages? I'm actively building the page.

Disambiguation link notification for April 17



An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Mario Recordón ↗, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Osorno ↗ ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Mario_Record%C3%B3n check to confirm]&nbsp;|&nbsp;[//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Mario_Record%C3%B3n?client=notify fix with Dab solver]).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 14:36, 17 April 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 24



An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Josef Bílý ↗, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Frýdek ↗ ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Josef_B%C3%ADl%C3%BD check to confirm]&nbsp;|&nbsp;[//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Josef_B%C3%ADl%C3%BD?client=notify fix with Dab solver]).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 14:07, 24 April 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 15



An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Carlos Real de Azúa ↗, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Dualism ↗ ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Carlos_Real_de_Az%C3%BAa check to confirm]&nbsp;|&nbsp;[//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Carlos_Real_de_Az%C3%BAa?client=notify fix with Dab solver]).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 13:06, 15 May 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 3



An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Witold Sobków ↗, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page MFA ↗ ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Witold_Sobk%C3%B3w check to confirm]&nbsp;|&nbsp;[//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Witold_Sobk%C3%B3w?client=notify fix with Dab solver]).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:22, 3 June 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 13



An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Rudolf von Urban ↗, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Carmel ↗<!-- ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Rudolf_von_Urban check to confirm]&nbsp;|&nbsp;[//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Rudolf_von_Urban?client=notify fix with Dab solver])-->.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:55, 13 September 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message



<table class="messagebox " style="border: 1px solid #AAA; background: ivory; padding: 0.5em; width: 100%;">
<tr><td style="vertical-align:middle; padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em;">40px ↗</td><td>Hello! Voting in the '''2020 Arbitration Committee elections ↗''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2020|end}}-1 day}}. All '''eligible users ↗''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee ↗ is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process ↗. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans ↗, topic bans ↗, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy ↗ describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates ↗ and submit your choices on the '''2020|poll}}|voting page ↗'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:49, 24 November 2020 (UTC)
</td></tr>
</table>
<!-- Message sent by User:Xaosflux@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2020/Coordination/MMS/07&oldid=990308533 -->

Disambiguation link notification for December 29



An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Sergey Dmitriyevich Urusov ↗, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Peremyshl ↗<!-- ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Sergey_Dmitriyevich_Urusov check to confirm]&nbsp;|&nbsp;[//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Sergey_Dmitriyevich_Urusov?client=notify fix with Dab solver])-->.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:11, 29 December 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 1



An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Kalikoqu ↗, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Church ↗<!-- ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Kalikoqu check to confirm]&nbsp;|&nbsp;[//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Kalikoqu?client=notify fix with Dab solver])-->.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:06, 1 July 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message



<table class="messagebox " style="border: 1px solid #AAA; background: ivory; padding: 0.5em; width: 100%;">
<tr><td style="vertical-align:middle; padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em;">40px ↗</td><td>Hello! Voting in the '''2021 Arbitration Committee elections ↗''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2021|end}}-1 day}}. All '''eligible users ↗''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee ↗ is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process ↗. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans ↗, topic bans ↗, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy ↗ describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates ↗ and submit your choices on the '''2021|poll}}|voting page ↗'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. <small>MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:50, 23 November 2021 (UTC)</small>
</td></tr>
</table>
<!-- Message sent by User:Cyberpower678@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2021/Coordination/MM/07&oldid=1056563443 -->

Disambiguation link notification for December 29



An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Gurre ↗, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Somali ↗<!-- ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Gurre check to confirm]&nbsp;|&nbsp;[//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Gurre?client=notify fix with Dab solver])-->.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 29 December 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 31



An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Avtarjeet Singh Dhanjal ↗, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page British ↗<!-- ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Avtarjeet_Singh_Dhanjal check to confirm]&nbsp;|&nbsp;[//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Avtarjeet_Singh_Dhanjal?client=notify fix with Dab solver])-->.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 31 January 2022 (UTC)

April 2022



25px|alt=Information icon ↗ Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at :Georgia-Pacific ↗. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism ↗ and have been reverted ↗. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges ↗. Thank you.<!-- Template:uw-vandalism2 --> Horse Eye&#39;s Back (talk) 15:24, 26 April 2022 (UTC)

April 2022



25px|alt=Information icon ↗ Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at :Koch family foundations ↗. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism ↗ and have been reverted ↗. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges ↗. Thank you.<!-- Template:uw-vandalism2 --> Horse Eye&#39;s Back (talk) 15:30, 26 April 2022 (UTC)

COI



25px|alt=Information icon ↗ Hello, Uhtregorn. We welcome ↗ your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about ↗ on the page Koch industries ↗, you may have a conflict of interest ↗ (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the '''conflict of interest guideline ↗''' and FAQ for organizations ↗ for more information. We ask that you:


In addition, you are '''required''' by the Wikimedia Foundation ↗'s terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure ↗.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you.<!-- THE FOLLOWING CATEGORY SHOULD BE REMOVED IF THE USER IS BLOCKED, OR IT IS DECIDED THAT THIS USER DOES NOT HAVE A COI, OR THIS TEMPLATE HAS BEEN IN PLACE FOR A WHILE WITH NO ACTION. -->{{#ifexpr: ({{#time: U | now}} - 1651254179) < 13150000 | {{PAGENAME}} ↗ | }}<!-- Template:uw-coi --> Horse Eye&#39;s Back (talk) 17:42, 29 April 2022 (UTC)
:Ha! This is laughable. Interesting that you are jumping to conclusions without any discussion. Rather than Assume Good Faith, you are actively hostile, leading one to fire back with the same question... do YOU have a COI?
::Most of your edits are explainable by reasoning other than COI. This one I have a problem with though https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Koch_family_foundations&diff=prev&oldid=1081360573 ↗, I can't think of a good faith explanation other than COI or vandalism besides a simple mistake which it does not appear to be. This wasn't a copy edit and it wasn't correcting vandalism, so what was it? Horse Eye&#39;s Back (talk) 18:21, 29 April 2022 (UTC)
:::An anonymous SPA added "denial" when "skepticism" would be more appropriateUhtregorn (talk) 02:45, 30 April 2022 (UTC)
::::Why isn't denial appropriate? Denial is whats in the article and denial is what WP:RS say the organization engages in, right? Horse Eye&#39;s Back (talk) 18:43, 29 April 2022 (UTC)
:::::There's also due & undue weight and one of the things considered is what the source is. Proper attribution should be considered with a source.Uhtregorn (talk) 02:45, 30 April 2022 (UTC)
::::::What does that have to do with the perfectly valid category you removed? It wasn't vandalism and it was accurate, so why did you remove it while crying vandalism? Horse Eye&#39;s Back (talk) 20:46, 29 April 2022 (UTC)
:::::::Change your tone. You are in violation of Assume Good faith and Civil. Your history looks impassioned and I advise you to take a step back and get back to a calm, rational state of mind.Uhtregorn (talk) 02:45, 30 April 2022 (UTC)
::::::::My apologies, I did not mean to offend you! Just trying to understand whats going on here. Are you aware that alleging vandalism where none exists is against WP:AGF ↗ and WP:CIVIL ↗? Horse Eye&#39;s Back (talk) 22:22, 29 April 2022 (UTC)
:::::::::Ok, maybe vandalism was the wrong word. But its an SPA with no registration doing a drive-by edit on a page with a history of POV pushes. Hard to not assume its someone with a POV. Editors often (forgivably) forget to keep personal bias out of activity. No one is immune to it, its completely human to get impassioned about something. Doesn't matter how we feel about a subject, we should remain as unbiased as possible.Uhtregorn (talk) 02:45, 30 April 2022 (UTC)
::::::::::Might I suggest that you let your POV get the better of you in this situation? Horse Eye&#39;s Back (talk) 01:55, 30 April 2022 (UTC)
:::::::::::Aiming to remove POV is not a POV. I could suggest the same thing in your situation.Uhtregorn (talk) 02:45, 30 April 2022 (UTC)
::::::::::::What POV were you removing? The edit you reverted appears to have been a legitimate one. Horse Eye&#39;s Back (talk) 03:11, 30 April 2022 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 24



An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Olivier Guéant ↗, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page French ↗<!-- ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Olivier_Gu%C3%A9ant check to confirm]&nbsp;|&nbsp;[//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Olivier_Gu%C3%A9ant?client=notify fix with Dab solver])-->.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 24 May 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message



<div class="ivmbox " style="margin-bottom: 1em; border: 1px solid #AAA; background-color: ivory; padding: 0.5em; display: flex; align-items: center; ">
<div class="ivmbox-image" style="padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em; flex: 1 0 40px;">40px ↗</div>
<div class="ivmbox-text">
Hello! Voting in the '''2022 Arbitration Committee elections ↗''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2022|end}}-1 day}}. All '''eligible users ↗''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee ↗ is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process ↗. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans ↗, topic bans ↗, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy ↗ describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates ↗ and submit your choices on the '''2022|poll}}|voting page ↗'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. <small>MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:33, 29 November 2022 (UTC)</small>

</div>
</div>
<!-- Message sent by User:Xaosflux@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2022/Coordination/MM/06&oldid=1124425186 -->

Caleb Maupin ↗ moved to draftspace



An article you recently created, Caleb Maupin ↗, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable ↗, independent sources ↗. <small>(? ↗)</small> Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability ↗ is of central importance ↗ on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace ↗ (with a prefix of "<code>Draft:</code>" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline ↗ and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Jamiebuba (talk) 08:10, 1 December 2022 (UTC)

Speedy deletion ↗ nomination of :Rohen Shah ↗


48px|left|alt=|link= ↗
{{Quote box|quote=<p>If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article ↗.</p><p>You may want to consider using the Article Wizard ↗ to help you create articles.</p>|width=20%|align=right}}
A tag has been placed on :Rohen Shah ↗ requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion ↗, because the article appears to be about a person, a group of people, an individual animal, an organization (band, club, company, etc.), web content, or an organized event that does not credibly indicate ↗ how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion ↗, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable ↗.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may '''contest the nomination''' by visiting the page ↗ and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines ↗. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the {{Querylink|Special:Log|qs=type=delete&page=Rohen+Shah|deleting administrator}}. <!-- Template:Db-notability-notice --> 2A01:4C8:B3:FE70:FCB8:F074:DED0:D201 ↗ (talk) 05:56, 4 December 2022 (UTC)

First Media Corporation ↗ moved to draftspace



An article you recently created, First Media Corporation ↗, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from reliable ↗, independent sources ↗ in order to show it meets WP:GNG ↗. It should have at least three. And please remember that interviews, as primary sources, do not count towards GNG.<small>(? ↗)</small> Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability ↗ is of central importance ↗ on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace ↗ (with a prefix of "<code>Draft:</code>" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline ↗ and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.'''<span style="color:#536895;">Onel</span><span style="color:#ffb300;">5969</span>''' <sup><i style="color:blue">TT me</i></sup> 10:56, 2 March 2023 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 28



An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Nick Begich III ↗, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Democratic Party ↗ and Republican Party ↗<!-- ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Nick_Begich_III check to confirm]&nbsp;|&nbsp;[//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Nick_Begich_III?client=notify fix with Dab solver])-->.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 28 June 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of :Nick Begich III ↗ for deletion


<div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">48px|alt=|link= ↗</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article :Nick Begich III ↗, to which you have significantly contributed ↗, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines ↗ or if it should be deleted ↗.

The discussion will take place at '''Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nick Begich III ↗''' until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by ''SDZeroBot'' (talk) 01:03, 30 June 2023 (UTC)<!-- User:SDZeroBot/AfD notifier/template -->

Concern regarding Draft:First Media Corporation ↗


25px|alt=Information icon ↗ Hello, Uhtregorn. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:First Media Corporation ↗, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted ↗, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it ↗ again&#32;or request ↗ that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted ↗ so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 11:03, 2 August 2023 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Caleb Maupin ↗


25px|alt=Information icon ↗ Hello, Uhtregorn. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Caleb Maupin ↗, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted ↗, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it ↗ again&#32;or request ↗ that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted ↗ so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 04:01, 14 September 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message



<div class="ivmbox " style="margin-bottom: 1em; border: 1px solid #AAA; background-color: ivory; padding: 0.5em; display: flex; align-items: center; ">
<div class="ivmbox-image" style="padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em; flex: 1 0 40px; max-width: 100px">40px ↗</div>
<div class="ivmbox-text">
Hello! Voting in the '''2023 Arbitration Committee elections ↗''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2023|end}}-1 day}}. All '''eligible users ↗''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee ↗ is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process ↗. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans ↗, topic bans ↗, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy ↗ describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates ↗ and submit your choices on the '''2023|poll}}|voting page ↗'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. <small>MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:50, 28 November 2023 (UTC)</small>

</div>
</div>
<!-- Message sent by User:Cyberpower678@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2023/Coordination/MM/06&oldid=1187132321 -->

December 2023



25px|alt=Information icon ↗ Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. A page you recently created, :Draft:U.S._Ransomware_Task_Force ↗, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines ↗ for new pages, so it has been moved to where you can continue to work on it. Please consider using the Article Wizard ↗ or the Articles for Creation ↗ procedure. For more information about creating articles, you may want to read "Your first article ↗". You may also want to read our introduction page ↗ to learn more about contributing. Thank you. <!-- Template:uw-articletodraft --> Cray04 (talk) 05:41, 1 December 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion ↗ nomination of :Draft:U.S. Ransomware Task Force ↗


48px|left|alt=|link= ↗
{{Quote box|quote=<p>If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article ↗.</p><p>You may want to consider using the Article Wizard ↗ to help you create articles.</p>|width=20%|align=right}}
A tag has been placed on :Draft:U.S. Ransomware Task Force ↗ requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion ↗, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement ↗. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://decrypt.co/120105/doj-fbi-hive-network-ransomware-infiltration, https://www.healthlawadvisor.com/u-s-department-of-justice-announces-interagency-task-force-to-combat-covid-19-relief-fraud, and https://aag-it.com/the-latest-ransomware-statistics/. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of ''information'', but not as a source of ''sentences''. This part is crucial: ''say it in your own words''. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators '''will be blocked from editing ↗'''.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you ''must'' verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials ↗. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission ↗ for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy ↗ for more details, or ask a question here ↗.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may '''contest the nomination''' by visiting the page ↗ and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines ↗. <!-- Template:Db-copyvio-notice --><!-- Template:Db-csd-notice-custom --> Cray04 (talk) 05:54, 1 December 2023 (UTC)

Cut and paste move


25px|alt=Information icon ↗ Hi, and thank you for your contributions ↗ to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give a page a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into :U.S. Ransomware Task Force ↗. This is known as a "cut-and-paste move ↗", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history ↗, which is legally required for attribution ↗. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be ''moved'' to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases for registered users, once your account is four days old and has ten edits ↗, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab ↗ at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu ↗ for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect ↗ from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves ↗ to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Requests for history merge ↗. Thank you. <!-- Template:uw-c&pmove --> <span style="font-family:Papyrus; color:#800080;">'''''L'''''iz</span> <sup style="font-family: Times New Roman; color: #006400;">'''''Read!''''' ↗ '''''Talk!'''''</sup> 01:35, 2 December 2023 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:First Media Corporation ↗


48px|left|alt=|link= ↗

Hello, Uhtregorn. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation ↗ submission or Draft ↗ page you started, "First Media Corporation ↗".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace ↗, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion ↗. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. <!-- Template:Db-draft-deleted --><!-- Template:Db-csd-deleted-custom --> Hey man im josh (talk) 18:54, 2 February 2024 (UTC)

Nomination of :Edward B. Kurpis ↗ for deletion


<div class="afd-notice">
<div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">48px|alt=|link= ↗</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article :Edward B. Kurpis ↗ is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines ↗ or whether it should be deleted ↗.

The article will be discussed at '''Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Edward B. Kurpis ↗''' until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.<!-- Template:Afd notice --></div> <sub>signed, </sub>'''''Rosguill''''' <sup>''talk''</sup> 16:18, 15 February 2024 (UTC)

Proposed deletion ↗ of :Let America Vote ↗


left|link=|alt=Notice|48px| ↗

The article :Let America Vote ↗ has been proposed for deletion ↗&#32;because of the following concern:
<blockquote>'''LAV got some national media attention when it first launched, but that's mainly a function of having a good publicist and the fact that the group's founder was coming off a high-profile Senate run. The fact that they seem to have gotten barely any national coverage since then (nothing cited on this page and I couldn't really find anything) shows they aren't really notable. Most of the coverage I could find was primarily about LAV's partner group, End Citizens United ↗.'''</blockquote>

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons ↗.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary ↗ or on the article's talk page ↗.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process ↗, but other deletion process ↗es exist. In particular, the speedy deletion ↗ process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion ↗ allows discussion to reach consensus ↗ for deletion.<!-- Template:Proposed deletion notify -->

'''<span style="color: red;">This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history ↗ of each individual page for details.</span>''' Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:01, 18 July 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation ↗: Locus Robotics ↗ (July 31)


<div style="border: solid 1px #FCC; background-color: #F8EEBC; padding: 0.5em 1em; color: #000; margin: 1.5em; width: 90%;"> 50px|left ↗Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation ↗ has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time.<nowiki> </nowiki>The reasons left by SafariScribe were:

{{divbox|gray|3=This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources ↗. ''Reliable'' sources are required so that information can be verified ↗. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners ↗ and Citing sources ↗.|}}<!--
-->{{divbox|gray|3=This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article ↗. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are: <br />
Make sure you add references that meet ''all four'' of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid ↗ when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.|}}<!--
--
--> Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit ''after they have been resolved''.
{{clear}}

<span style="font-family:Papyrus; color:#800080;">Safari Scribe</span><sup style="font-family: Times New Roman; color: #006400;">'''''Edits!''''' ↗ '''''Talk!'''''</sup> 18:46, 31 July 2024 (UTC)</div><!--Template:AfC decline-->

September 2024



30px|alt=Stop icon ↗ You may be '''blocked from editing ↗ without further warning''' the next time you use Wikipedia for promotion or advertising ↗, as you did at :Refugee lens investing ↗. {{PAGENAME}} ↗<!-- Template:uw-advert4 --> '''<span style="text-shadow:7px 7px 8px black; font-family:Papyrus"><span style="color:#3399ff">scope_creep</span><sup>Talk</sup></span>''' 07:51, 2 September 2024 (UTC)

Deletion discussion about Refugee lens investing ↗



Hello Uhtregorn, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

While your contributions are appreciated, I wanted to let you know that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Refugee lens investing ↗, should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Refugee lens investing ↗.

Deletion discussions ↗ usually run for seven days and are ''not'' votes. Our guide ↗ about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. The most common issue in these discussions is notability ↗, but it's not the only aspect that may be discussed; read the nomination and any other comments carefully before you contribute to the discussion. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with <code><nowiki>{{Re|</nowiki>North8000<nowiki>}}</nowiki></code>. And don't forget to sign your reply with <code><nowiki>~~~~</nowiki></code> . Thanks!

<small>(Message delivered via the Page Curation ↗ tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)</small><!-- Template:AfD-notice-NPF -->

<b style="color: #0000cc;">''North8000''</b> (talk) 18:25, 19 September 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation ↗: Locus Robotics ↗ (October 8)


<div style="border: solid 1px #FCC; background-color: #F8EEBC; padding: 0.5em 1em; color: #000; margin: 1.5em; width: 90%;"> 50px|left ↗Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation ↗ has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time.<nowiki> </nowiki>The reason left by AlphaBetaGamma was:

{{divbox|gray|3=This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources ↗. ''Reliable'' sources are required so that information can be verified ↗. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners ↗ and Citing sources ↗.|}}<!--
--
-->&nbsp;The comment the reviewer left was:

{{divbox|blue|3=It was looking fair until the "Operations" section had unsourced claims. The sentence before that is a massive citation overkill ↗ and you want to fix that.}} Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit ''after they have been resolved''.
{{clear}}

ABG <small> (Talk/Report any mistakes here) </small> 09:27, 8 October 2024 (UTC)</div><!--Template:AfC decline-->

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message



<div class="ivmbox " style="margin-bottom: 1em; border: 1px solid #a2a9b1; background-color: #fdf2d5; padding: 0.5em; display: flex; align-items: center; ">
<div class="ivmbox-image noresize" style="padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em;">40px ↗</div>
<div class="ivmbox-text">
Hello! Voting in the '''2024 Arbitration Committee elections ↗''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2024|end}}-1 day}}. All '''eligible users ↗''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee ↗ is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process ↗. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans ↗, topic bans ↗, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy ↗ describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates ↗ and submit your choices on the '''2024|poll}}|voting page ↗'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. <small>MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:37, 19 November 2024 (UTC)</small>

</div>
</div>
<!-- Message sent by User:Cyberpower678@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2024/Coordination/MM/06&oldid=1258243641 -->

Dany Bahar (economist) ↗ moved to draftspace



Thanks for your contributions to Dany Bahar (economist) ↗. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because '''it needs more sources to establish notability'''.
I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page ↗.
When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit for review" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. BoyTheKingCanDance (talk) 04:16, 6 December 2024 (UTC)

Danny Elfman



Would you be interested in an RfC about where we should put the sexual assault allegations and how much weight they should be given? <span class="tmpl-colored-link {{#if:|mw-no-invert|}}" style="color: hotpink; text-decoration: inherit;">wizzito</span> ↗ &#124; <span class="tmpl-colored-link {{#if:|mw-no-invert|}}" style="color: navyc; text-decoration: inherit;">say hello!</span> ↗ 05:35, 6 January 2025 (UTC)
:{{Reply to|Wizzito}}I mean, sure I'll take a look. But I think the simplest solution here is just add back in a short paragraph that summarizes the previous section. I think it's fair that it should not be one of the largest sections in the article. Uhtregorn (talk) 06:29, 6 January 2025 (UTC)

Long term edit warring at Koch family



Uhtregorn, if you continue to restore your disputed edit to :Koch family ↗ without talk page consensus to do so, you will be blocked from editing the page altogether. Your disruption with regard to the use of climate change denial in relation to :Koch industries ↗ and :Koch family ↗ go back to at least 2022 when {{u|Horse Eye's Back}} pointed out the same POV issues to you above ↗. It needs to stop, as does your claiming that any editor who reverts you is somehow a sock or meatpuppet.-- <span style="color: Navy;">'''Ponyo'''</span><sup><span style="color: Navy;">''bons mots''</span></sup> 20:58, 7 February 2025 (UTC)
:{{u|Ponyo}} the user currently making those edits is literally under suspicion of being a sock or meatpuppet. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Daniel_Case#48_hour_block ↗.
:And I never changed the language to the pages. There were POV pushes by single-purpose editors.
::No, Theofunny is not under investiagtion as a meatpuupet; a checkuser explicitly stated in that same discussion that they were unrelated to the other editor. Even if they were sill under suspicion, that in no way gives you leeway to restore your disputed edits. The only POV pushes I can see is you, for years, changing "climate change denier" to "climate change skeptic" with multiple editors objecting. If you think you can get consensus for the disputed change, start a discussion on the talk page. -- <span style="color: Navy;">'''Ponyo'''</span><sup><span style="color: Navy;">''bons mots''</span></sup> 21:38, 7 February 2025 (UTC)
:::For years, the language was in place. And then a string of editors - often single purpose editors - changed the language. I think people tend to let their emotions cloud their judgement on that page because of how they feel about the family.
::::The wikilink is :climate change denial ↗ and you are repeatedly piping it so that it appears as "climate change skeptic". That is a POV piping to circumvent consensus that climate change denial is to be used on articles. Again, if you want your preferred version to stay, you need to get consensus for it. You can't just brush off the pages and pages of discussions that have led to the use of the term at Talk:Climate change denial ↗.. -- <span style="color: Navy;">'''Ponyo'''</span><sup><span style="color: Navy;">''bons mots''</span></sup> 22:18, 7 February 2025 (UTC)
:::::That's what it literally said for years in raw text and then it was the same editors who came up with that discussion page and added the links and then changed the text.
::::::That's irrelevant because consensus '''''now''''' is to use climate change denial, and the consensus of every editor you revert is that climate change denial should be used. Again, if you disagree, you need to demonstrate that "skeptic" should be used in that particular article. You cannot continue to edit war against multiple editors and the current consensus.-- <span style="color: Navy;">'''Ponyo'''</span><sup><span style="color: Navy;">''bons mots''</span></sup> 22:32, 7 February 2025 (UTC)

Introduction to contentious topics


{{ivmbox | image = Commons-emblem-notice.svg |imagesize=50px | bg = #E5F8FF | text = You have recently edited a page related to '''climate change ↗''', a topic designated as '''''contentious ↗'''''. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and <em>does <strong>not</strong> imply that there are any issues with your editing</em>.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as ''contentious topics''. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee ↗. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators ↗ have an expanded level of powers and discretion in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit <strong>carefully and constructively</strong>, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

<p>Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics ''procedures'', you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard ↗ or you may learn more about this contentious topic here ↗. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{tl|Ctopics/aware}} template. </p>}}<!-- Derived from Template:Contentious topics/alert/first -->

:James Boasberg ↗



Hi there! I noticed this edit ↗ and I was wondering how the source supports the assertion that Boasberg is Jewish. Am I missing something in the NYT announcement? Joyous! Noise! ↗ 15:00, 18 March 2025 (UTC)
:Oh oops! Got my wires crossed. That blurb was from a social media post by Tessaron news (definitely not an RS), and ''not'' in the NYT piece. I think I just got confused having both open at the same time. My apologies. Uhtregorn (talk) 23:39, 18 March 2025 (UTC)
::No worries. I just kept reading the nyt clip over and over thinking "What am I missing here? There must be some social clue I'm just not seeing." Joyous! Noise! ↗ 00:10, 19 March 2025 (UTC)
::Hello.
::It looks like you just made the same claim again ↗ using a different link that also doesn't support the claim.?
::The link used references exclusively references his father's involvement in a civil war org and says nothing about his father's religion or ethnicity. Manamanadodododo (talk) 21:22, 28 March 2025 (UTC)
:::I may be wrong here on OR grounds but I figured it was a minor enough issue to not be contentious - if there's a source that points to his parents being Jewish, isn't it okay to draw the conclusion that he is as well? Jewish is not exclusively a religion - it's an ethnicity as well. Seems fair to include. Uhtregorn (talk) 07:28, 29 March 2025 (UTC)
::::Concluding he is ethnically (at least) partially Jewish based on a parent would be a different discussion since the source provided says no such thing about his father. Maybe you meant to link to a different source, but the one used exclusively references his father's interest in civil war battlefield preservation. Manamanadodododo (talk) 10:51, 29 March 2025 (UTC)
:::::I may have read that wrong, but doesn't it describe his parents as Jewish? I will reevaluate because I'm human and can make errors, but if it does indeed mention it, I think it clears. Uhtregorn (talk) 11:27, 29 March 2025 (UTC)
::::::In such a situation, when referring to religion it would be unsourced/unknown/inaccurate and referencing it without an ethnicity quantifier or without instead listing it under parents' full heritage, indicates his religion.
::::::Regardless, what you posted has one simple paragraph that does not refer to both of his parents nor to Jewish anything. It is civil war stuff and that's it. So it is making a claim that is not backed by the source provided.
::::::This is your source:
::::::''Since the first years of the modern Civil War battlefield preservation movement, Tersh Boasberg has been a tireless advocate for saving hallowed ground. Boasberg, a Harvard Law School graduate and Washington, D.C., lawyer specializing in preservation and land-use issues, provided the legal muscle for the Save the Battlefield Coalition, Annie Snyder’s grassroots organization that defeated a mall on the Manassas battlefield. He helped start the Brandy Station Foundation and worked closely with preservationist and fellow Bearss honoree Clark B. Hall to defeat plans for a race track and a massive residential/industrial development on the Brandy Station battlefield. His call for a study of the state of battlefield preservation, published in The Washington Post in 1992, helped lead to the establishment of the congressional Civil War Sites Advisory Commission. From 2000 to 2011, Boasberg chaired the District of Columbia’s Historic Preservation Review Board.'' Manamanadodododo (talk) 21:27, 29 March 2025 (UTC)
:::::::I understand the concern but I believe the outstanding consensus is that Jewish is both a religion and an ethnicity, with overlap, and context mattering. Someone can be of Jewish ancestry even if they are not practicing. I may be wrong and will review, but the source I thought I saw pointed to his parents being Jewish. Reviewing now. Uhtregorn (talk) 23:32, 29 March 2025 (UTC)
::::::::I agree - if a reputable source said a parent(s) had Jewish, German, Igbo, whatever ancestry and the post said the person/parents had Jewish, German, Igbo, whatever ancestry, there'd be no contention. The issue here is that the claim has been made more than once with sources that say no such thing. Manamanadodododo (talk) 03:47, 30 March 2025 (UTC)

April 2025



25px|alt=Information icon ↗ Welcome to Wikipedia ↗. We appreciate your contributions ↗, but in one of your recent edits&nbsp;to :James Boasberg ↗, it appears that you have added original research ↗, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say ↗. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source ↗ for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources ↗. ''{{pb}}You have now been reverted a couple times for including content that is not explicitly supported by the sources you cite. Please read WP:SYNTH ↗. You cannot string together sources to derive a conclusion, whether it be two sources or a hundred. If you disagree, then start a discussion on the article's talk page to gain consensus ↗ but until you have consensus, you (nor anyone else) should add it again.''<!-- Template:uw-nor1 --> S0091 (talk) 20:56, 2 April 2025 (UTC)

Introduction to contentious topics


{{ivmbox | image = Commons-emblem-notice.svg |imagesize=50px | bg = #E5F8FF | text = You have recently edited a page related to '''post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people''', a topic designated as '''''contentious ↗'''''. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and <em>does <strong>not</strong> imply that there are any issues with your editing</em>.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as ''contentious topics''. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee ↗. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators ↗ have an expanded level of powers and discretion in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit <strong>carefully and constructively</strong>, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

<p>Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics ''procedures'', you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard ↗ or you may learn more about this contentious topic here ↗. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{tl|Ctopics/aware}} template. </p>}}<!-- Derived from Template:Contentious topics/alert/first -->

Nomination of :Blockchain LLC ↗ for deletion


<div class="afd-notice">
<div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0;">48px|alt=|link= ↗</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article :Blockchain LLC ↗ is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines ↗ or whether it should be deleted ↗.

The article will be discussed at '''Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Blockchain LLC ↗''' until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.<!-- Template:Afd notice --></div> -- <span style="color:#002BB8;">Luk</span> <sup><span style="color:#BB0066;">talk</span></sup> 08:29, 7 May 2025 (UTC)

Your democratic backsliding edits



In the last day, you removed the category ''Democratic backsliding in the United States'' from a large number of articles, with the edit summary "pov coatrack." Some of these removals are in such quick succession that it suggests you didn't read the articles first to check whether the category was substantiated in the text, @Lova Falk reverted one of these with the edit summary "This is discussed in the article." In some cases, it's clear to me that the category is relevant (e.g., attempts to restrict free speech are an element of democratic backsliding, and several of the articles are about attempts by the second Trump administration to deport people on the basis of their speech; another article where you did this is Second presidency of Donald Trump ↗, which clearly has content supporting the category). What are the article-specific reasons for your decisions? FactOrOpinion (talk) 13:21, 12 June 2025 (UTC)
:No I read them all. Uhtregorn (talk) 22:47, 12 June 2025 (UTC)
::Thanks for clarifying that part, but you didn't answer my question. As a start, please tell me why you removed that category from the following articles:
::* First presidency of Donald Trump ↗
::* Second presidency of Donald Trump ↗
::* Detention of Mahmoud Khalil ↗
::FactOrOpinion (talk) 23:05, 12 June 2025 (UTC)

:::Because its an opinion that any of those are democratic backsliding. Uhtregorn (talk) 23:28, 12 June 2025 (UTC)
::::I'm not sure what you're basing that claim on. Are you saying you reject that democratic backsliding can be assessed with evidence, even though researchers study it, and thus it can only ever be a matter of opinion? If not, then why are you claiming that it's an opinion in these specific cases? FactOrOpinion (talk) 00:41, 13 June 2025 (UTC)
:::::It is an opinion that the presidency of Donald Trump is democratic backsliding. Any research pointing to that is an opinion. It is not a generally accepted belief. Not being happy with the outcome of an election does not equate to democratic backsliding. Uhtregorn (talk) 01:01, 13 June 2025 (UTC)
::::::You didn't answer my first question, but it sounds like you think it's impossible to conclude that X is an example of democratic backsliding based on evidence, no matter what X is (e.g., you'd also say that it's just an opinion that Jim Crow ↗ is an example of democratic backsliding).
::::::"Any research pointing to that is an opinion." And your evidence for that is ___?
::::::Also, even if you think that it's just RSs' opinions, why are you prioritizing your own opinion about it over that of RSs?
::::::"Not being happy with the outcome of an election does not equate to democratic backsliding." I agree, but there's no reason to assume that researchers who've looked at the various elements of democratic backsliding (e.g., erosion of civil liberties like free speech and due process) concluded that democratic backsliding occurred in the first Trump admin. and is already occurring in the second Trump admin. are basing it on "not being happy with the outcome of an election." FactOrOpinion (talk) 02:00, 13 June 2025 (UTC)
:::::::You sound a little too vested in this. Maybe take a step back for a little. I did not say that about Jim Crow - the general consensus on that is that it was indeed democratic backsliding. Trump won the popular vote in the last election. Democracy does not mean "only if it goes one way". I don't mean to sound callous here, but there are so many editors who seem to have an ax to grind - and everyone has their own personal biases, and that's fine - but Wikipedia is not a place to "correct" narratives. It requires nuance and honest assessment to present the truth in the best possible way given what's available. Do these researchers have a certain bias? Are there others with opposing views? Is it commonly accepted or is it a point of view that at least half the country (and audience as a whole) disagrees with? Uhtregorn (talk) 02:33, 13 June 2025 (UTC)
::::::::Given that you're the one who chose to delete the category from over two dozen articles, it's funny for you to suggest that I'm the one who's invested in it. What I'm invested in is evidence-based discussions. I take it that you have no evidence for your claim that "Any research pointing to that is an opinion."
::::::::I agree that "Wikipedia is not a place to "correct" narratives" and also that "Democracy does not mean 'only if it goes one way'." No one is suggesting otherwise, so those are straw man arguments.
::::::::I gave you a couple of examples of the elements that researchers look at in assessing whether backsliding is occurring: erosion of civil liberties like free speech and due process. Assessing these kinds of issues doesn't depend on whether one likes or dislikes the president. FactOrOpinion (talk) 03:30, 13 June 2025 (UTC)
:::::::::You should take some time to ponder NPOV. Uhtregorn (talk) 04:28, 13 June 2025 (UTC)
::::::::::First of all, Uhtregorn, could you please focus on the content rather than making remarks about other editors. Comments like "too vested" or "should ponder NPOV" divert the discussion from evidence to personal insinuations, which are not appropriate in a content debate. The key issue is whether reliable sources describe these developments as democratic backsliding. FactOrOpinion is correctly grounding the discussion in such sources, which is exactly what Wikipedia policy requires. Personal disagreement with the sources does not override the sourcing standard. Lova Falk (talk) 05:43, 13 June 2025 (UTC)
:::::::::::Please remain CIVIL. You're new here and have not followed along with the discussion. If you too are heated about this I welcome you to take a break before returning. This is a misuse of sourcing policies. Firstly, for controversial topics attribution is typically meant to be applied. So when all the sources for a particular point are known to be partisan, that should be mentioned. But in the grander text, when all the "sources" come from partisan sources, while blurbs within the page might be acceptable, that does not mean the overall page should be classified in a way as those partisan sources say. There is probably an uncontroversial, apolitical example to explain this: something like "just because a lot of tele-tubby academics insist that purple tele-tubbies are in fact pink tele-tubbies does not mean that we should categorize the purple tele-tubbies page as "pink tele-tubbies". Uhtregorn (talk) 06:24, 13 June 2025 (UTC)
::::::::::::It is actually very interesting Uhtregorn how everything you say about someone else seems to say something about you. I am perfectly calm and I don’t see anything uncivil in my comment. Now back on topic. The fact that a source takes a position on democratic backsliding does not automatically make it “partisan” in a way that invalidates its use. Scholarly studies, expert analyses, and mainstream reporting that apply widely recognized frameworks are not dismissed simply because some people disagree with their conclusions. WP:NPOV and WP:RS require us to reflect what reliable sources say, not to exclude them because they happen to discuss politically sensitive topics. Labelling all such sources as "partisan" would essentially make it impossible to cover any subject related to democratic backsliding, or indeed much of politics at all. Lova Falk (talk) 06:41, 13 June 2025 (UTC)
:::::::::::::You are reaching now. I advise all parties to take a step back and calm down. We can engage civilly after you've cooled off. Uhtregorn (talk) 07:30, 13 June 2025 (UTC)
::::::::::::If I'm now understanding right, you believe that it's inappropriate to use the category because you think its use is necessarily partisan, and unlike text in the body of an article, which can be attributed, there's no way to attribute a category.
::::::::::::The reason that I started the discussion here rather than on an article talk page is because you had deleted the category from so many articles, and I thought that the discussion needed to address the general question instead of having article-specific discussions over and over on the various talk pages, and I couldn't figure out where else to have the conversation. Since you're now suggesting that use of the category is a matter of NPOV, I'll open a discussion of the category at WP:NPOVN ↗, as I think it would be helpful to get more community input. FactOrOpinion (talk) 12:32, 13 June 2025 (UTC)
:::::::::::::Here's a link to the topic I started ↗ at NPOVN. FactOrOpinion (talk) 12:54, 13 June 2025 (UTC)

Project 2025 ↗ Coatrack



I appreciate your cat edit to the page do you think there are article content edits to be done in the same spirit? If so I'd love to hear your suggestions at Talk:Project 2025 ↗ even if you don't have time to do the edits yourself. Czarking0 (talk) 15:01, 12 June 2025 (UTC)
:Sure, I'll take a look. Uhtregorn (talk) 22:48, 12 June 2025 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Dany Bahar (economist) ↗


25px|alt=Information icon ↗ Hello, Uhtregorn. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Dany Bahar (economist) ↗, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted ↗, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it ↗ again&#32;or request ↗ that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted ↗ so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 05:07, 11 July 2025 (UTC)

Mitsuo Nagamachi ↗ moved to draftspace



Thanks for your contributions to Mitsuo Nagamachi ↗. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because '''it needs more sources to establish notability''', '''it consists of machine-generated text''' and '''clear indications of AI hallucinations'''.
I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page ↗.
When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Ldm1954 (talk) 13:25, 7 September 2025 (UTC)

:There's no machine generated text. If you need more sources, okay I'll look. But the founder of an entire sub-industry seems notable. Uhtregorn (talk) 02:52, 8 September 2025 (UTC)

AfC ↗ notification: Draft:Mitsuo Nagamachi ↗ has a new comment


<div style="border:solid 1px #9accf6;background:#f1f9ff; padding: 0.5em 1em; color: #000; margin: 1.5em; width: 90%;"> 50px|left ↗
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Mitsuo Nagamachi ↗. Thanks! Ldm1954 (talk) 13:27, 7 September 2025 (UTC) </div>

I have sent you a note about a page you started



Hi Uhtregorn. Thank you for your work on Lior Div ↗. Another editor, Mariamnei, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol ↗ and left the following comment:

{{Bq|1=Thank you for your work on this article. Please fix the links to be embedded in the footnotes rather than afterwards. Thanks and have a wonderful day!}}

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{code|<nowiki>{{Re|</nowiki>Mariamnei<nowiki>}}</nowiki>}}. <small>(Message delivered via the Page Curation ↗ tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)</small><!-- Template:Sentnote-NPF -->

{{Re|Mariamnei}} Can you explain what you mean? I sincerely do not understand the request. Uhtregorn (talk) 06:51, 15 November 2025 (UTC)

Mariamnei (talk) 12:51, 13 November 2025 (UTC)

Nomination of :Lior Div ↗ for deletion


<div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">48px|alt=|link= ↗</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article :Lior Div ↗, to which you have significantly contributed ↗, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines ↗ or if it should be deleted ↗.

The discussion will take place at '''Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lior Div ↗''' until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by ''SDZeroBot'' (talk) 01:01, 16 November 2025 (UTC)<!-- User:SDZeroBot/AfD notifier/template -->

ArbCom 2025 Elections voter message



<div class="ivmbox " style="margin-bottom: 1em; border: 1px solid #a2a9b1; background-color: #fdf2d5; padding: 0.5em; display: flex; align-items: center; ">
<div class="ivmbox-image" style="padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em;flex-basis: 40px">40px ↗</div>
<div class="ivmbox-text">
Hello! Voting in the '''2025 Arbitration Committee elections ↗''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2025|end}}-1 day}}. All '''eligible users ↗''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee ↗ is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process ↗. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans ↗, topic bans ↗, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy ↗ describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please review the candidates ↗ and submit your choices on the '''2025|poll}}|voting page ↗'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. <small>MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:41, 18 November 2025 (UTC)</small>

</div>
</div>
<!-- Message sent by User:Cyberpower678@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2025/Coordination/MM/05&oldid=1322758768 -->

Proposed deletion ↗ of :Vladimir Lamm ↗


left|link=|alt=Notice|48px| ↗

The article :Vladimir Lamm ↗ has been proposed for deletion ↗&#32;because of the following concern:
<blockquote>'''Does not meet Wikipedia's standards for notability ↗'''</blockquote>

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary ↗ or on the article's talk page ↗.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process ↗, but other deletion process ↗es exist. In particular, articles for deletion ↗ allows discussion to reach consensus ↗ for deletion based on established criteria ↗.

If the proposed deletion has already been carried out, you may request undeletion ↗ of the article at any time.<!-- Template:Proposed deletion notify -->

This is an automated notification. Please refer to the page's history ↗ for further information. DatBot (talk) 00:31, 20 November 2025 (UTC)

Kamau Bobb ↗ moved to draftspace



Thanks for your contributions to Kamau Bobb ↗. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing as a live article at this time because '''it needs more sources to establish notability''' and '''As this is a controversial WP:BLP ↗, more coverage is needed outside antisemitism allegations per WP:1EVENT ↗.'''.
I have converted it to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page ↗.
When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Ca <i><sup style="display:inline-flex;rotate:7deg;">talk to me!</sup></i> 16:21, 8 January 2026 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Dany Bahar (economist) ↗


48px|left|alt=|link= ↗
Hello, Uhtregorn. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation ↗ submission or draft ↗ page you started, "Dany Bahar ↗".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion ↗. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. <!-- Template:Db-draft-deleted --><!-- Template:Db-csd-deleted-custom --> <span style="font-family:Papyrus; color:#800080;">'''''L'''''iz</span> <sup style="font-family: Times New Roman; color: #006400;">'''''Read!''''' ↗ '''''Talk!'''''</sup> 04:22, 16 January 2026 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Caleb Maupin ↗


48px|left|alt=|link= ↗
Hello, Uhtregorn. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation ↗ submission or draft ↗ page you started, "Caleb Maupin ↗".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion ↗. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. <!-- Template:Db-draft-deleted --><!-- Template:Db-csd-deleted-custom --> <span style="font-family:Papyrus; color:#800080;">'''''L'''''iz</span> <sup style="font-family: Times New Roman; color: #006400;">'''''Read!''''' ↗ '''''Talk!'''''</sup> 23:55, 19 January 2026 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started



Hi Uhtregorn. Thank you for your work on Jacquelline Fuller ↗. Another editor, Mariamnei, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol ↗ and left the following comment:

{{Bq|1=Thank you for your work on this article. Please fix the citation style. I recommend using the {{cite web}} template. Thanks and have a great day!}}

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{code|<nowiki>{{Re|</nowiki>Mariamnei<nowiki>}}</nowiki>}}. <small>(Message delivered via the Page Curation ↗ tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)</small><!-- Template:Sentnote-NPF -->

Mariamnei (talk) 09:42, 3 February 2026 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Mitsuo Nagamachi ↗


25px|alt=Information icon ↗ Hello, Uhtregorn. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Mitsuo Nagamachi ↗, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted ↗, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it ↗ again&#32;or request ↗ that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted ↗ so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 14:09, 7 February 2026 (UTC)

June 2026



30px|alt=Stop icon ↗ '''You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war ↗, according to the reverts you've made to :Danny Elfman ↗.''' This means that you are repeatedly reverting content back to how you think it should be, despite knowing that other editors disagree. Once it is known that there is a disagreement, users are expected to collaborate ↗ with others, avoid editing disruptively ↗, and try to reach a consensus ↗ – rather than repeatedly reverting the changes made by other users.

Important points to note:
# {{strong|Edit warring is disruptive behavior ↗ – regardless of how many reverts you have made;}}
# {{strong|Do not engage in edit warring – even if you believe that you are right.}}
You need to discuss the disagreement on the article's talk page ↗ and work towards a revision that represents consensus among everyone involved. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard ↗ or seek dispute resolution ↗ if discussions reach an impasse. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection ↗. {{strong|If you continue to engage in edit warring, you may be blocked ↗ from editing.}} <!-- Template:uw-ew --> Binksternet (talk) 03:13, 10 June 2026 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Kamau Bobb ↗


25px|alt=Information icon ↗ Hello, Uhtregorn. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Kamau Bobb ↗, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted ↗, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it ↗ again&#32;or request ↗ that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted ↗ so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 17:08, 10 June 2026 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started



Hi Uhtregorn. Thank you for your work on Eiichi Hosokawa ↗. Another editor, Mariamnei, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol ↗ and left the following comment:

{{Bq|1=Thank you for this article. The sources appear to be primarily about the company and not about the founder. Please establish notability for the founder as per WP:NBIO ↗. Alternatively, you can make the article about the company if it meets WP:NCORP ↗. Thanks and have a good day!}}

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{code|<nowiki>{{Re|</nowiki>Mariamnei<nowiki>}}</nowiki>}}. <small>(Message delivered via the Page Curation ↗ tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)</small><!-- Template:Sentnote-NPF -->

<span style="font:italic bold 115% Palatino,Georgia,serif;color:#1A4A3A;">Mariamnei</span> ✦ <sup><span style="color:#2D7A5F;font-style:italic;font-size:85%;">reach out 🕊️</span></sup> 11:13, 8 July 2026 (UTC)