User Talk: Yiosie2356

Server-side rendered snapshot of this editor's Wikipedia talk page discussions.

SpaceX rideshares

Hi, the Wiki diff view isn't that useful for table edits so I'm not sure what exactly you changed: Is List of Falcon 9 and Falcon Heavy launches ↗ up to date in that aspect, too? --mfb (talk) 04:07, 5 March 2020 (UTC)

::I'm updating the rideshares based on this page ↗. Because it lists "available flights" I don't know if the rideshare missions from July 2020 and earlier, previously taken from the original version of the SmallSat Rideshare Program page ↗, still exist or not (perhaps they do, but they're fully booked and thus not listed? No clue). I split the difference by leaving all the existing missions and just updating the payloads on the 2020 ↗ list, and fully updating all the missions on the 2021 ↗ page. I haven't checked the List of Falcon 9 and Falcon Heavy launches ↗ yet. I'll take a look at it later today, I suppose. Yiosie 2356 ↗ 17:53, 5 March 2020 (UTC)

About G-SATELLITE in 2020 in spaceflight

Hello Yiosie2356, I have an inquiry regarding your recent edit at 2020 in spaceflight ↗. The refs provided in the article, and a JAXA press release https://global.jaxa.jp/press/2020/04/20200430-1_e.html ↗ mentions the deployment of Quetzal-1, while they seem silent on G-SATELLITE. My assumption is that the latter hasn't been deployed and remains yet inside the ISS. I can always be wrong, so please disregard this message in that case. By the way, your continuous work in the Timeline of spaceflight pages has been a great motivator for me, and I'm sure your diligence benefits everyone reading the pages. Kind regards, Hms1103 (talk) 00:05, 1 May 2020 (UTC)
::{{Reply to|Hms1103}} Thanks for the inquiry! For some reason I thought that G-SATELLITE was mentioned in the reference I added, but it is not. Added a new reference https://www.fukuishimbun.co.jp/articles/-/1077428 ↗ for the deployment. I love improving spaceflight articles, especially the timeline lists, and I'm always open to corrections and suggestions! Yiosie 2356 ↗ 05:55, 1 May 2020 (UTC)
:::There were some conflicting informationhttps://twitter.com/planet4589/status/1255158970890756096 ↗ regarding G-SATELLITE, but I found a paper version of the ref you addedhttps://twitter.com/Zdz47X57Djfha0s/status/1255259551768731650 ↗ and yes it does say it was deployed on the 28th (28日、国際宇宙ステーション(ISS)の日本実験棟「きぼう」から放出された。). Thanks for clearing things up! Regards, Hms1103 (talk) 06:34, 1 May 2020 (UTC)

WikiProject Spaceflight newsletter notification

{|width=100% bgcolor=black style="border:2px solid #1E90FF; color:white;"
!rowspan=2 width=100px|100px ↗
!rowspan=2 style="padding:0px 2em; font-size:42px; text-align:left;"|The Downlink
|The WikiProject Spaceflight ↗ Newsletter
|-
|WikiProject Notification
|}
{|border=1 bgcolor=#FFFAF0 width=100% style="border:2px solid black; border-collapse: collapse;"
!bgcolor=black style="color:white; padding:5px;"|This is a one-time notification to all active WikiProject Spaceflight members.
|-
!style="padding:10px;"|The Downlink ↗ project page
|-
|style="padding:10px;"|I am notifying you, that thep ''The Downlink'' newsletter is starting up again, the first new issue will be published on the 1 November 2020.
|-
|style="padding:10px;"|

If you have any suggestions on what to add to the newsletter please leave a note at the newsletter discussion here: Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Spaceflight/Downlink ↗.

If you wish to have the newsletter added to your talk page on release then please add your name to here: Wikipedia:WikiProject Spaceflight/Downlink/Recipients ↗.

Thanks, {{noping|Terasail}} '''[Talk]'''
|}
--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:07, 23 October 2020 (UTC)

Long overdue!

{| style="border: 1px solid gray; background-color: #fdffe7;"
|rowspan="2" style="vertical-align:middle;" | {{#ifeq:{{{2}}}|alt|100px ↗|100px ↗}}
|rowspan="2" |
|style="font-size: x-large; padding: 0; vertical-align: middle; height: 1.1em;" | '''The SPFLT Achievement Patch'''
|-
|style="vertical-align: middle; border-top: 1px solid gray;" | For your appreciable contributions to Project: Spaceflight, especially keeping the chronologies updated. Neopeius (talk) 13:11, 26 October 2020 (UTC)
|}

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

<table class="messagebox " style="border: 1px solid #AAA; background: ivory; padding: 0.5em; width: 100%;">
<tr><td style="vertical-align:middle; padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em;">40px ↗</td><td>Hello! Voting in the '''2020 Arbitration Committee elections ↗''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2020|end}}-1 day}}. All '''eligible users ↗''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee ↗ is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process ↗. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans ↗, topic bans ↗, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy ↗ describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates ↗ and submit your choices on the '''2020|poll}}|voting page ↗'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:29, 24 November 2020 (UTC)
</td></tr></table>

Thank you for your continued work on the timeline!

{| style="border: 1px solid gray; background-color: #fdffe7;"
|rowspan="2" style="vertical-align:middle;" | {{#ifeq:{{{2}}}|alt|100px ↗|100px ↗}}
|rowspan="2" |
|style="font-size: x-large; padding: 0; vertical-align: middle; height: 1.1em;" | '''The ISSstar'''
|-
|style="vertical-align: middle; border-top: 1px solid gray;" | Wikipedia can sometimes be a thankless job -- but not at Project Spaceflight! We recognize and appreciate the hard work you're doing, keeping the timeline straight. Thank you! Neopeius (talk) 15:16, 8 January 2021 (UTC)
|}

(I've been working on the timeline from the other end: I've finished 1944-1952, and I've filled in orbital shots for 1966)

Starlink launches

Hi. This is regarding reversed edit in 2021 in spaceflight (January–June) ↗, when I use for e.g. "Starlink-18" in citation I mean Starlink v1.0-L18. I understand that this may cause confusion and will use proper naming in the future. Nonetheless, Emre Kelly states that both next Starlink launches are from pad 39A, though is seems logical for them to interchange the pads. Berkut88 (talk) 15:52, 28 January 2021 (UTC)

:Thanks for the clarification. I agree that the differing terminologies used for numbering Starlink launches can get pretty confusing. Once multiple sources agree that pad 39A will be used for Starlink v1.0-L18, feel free to change it back! Yiosie 2356 ↗ 21:47, 28 January 2021 (UTC)

List of Starship Flights

Sorry for the revert on List of Starship flights ↗. I think I fat-fingered things on my phone and didn't realize that'd rolled that back. My apologies. Carter (talk) 12:08, 7 June 2021 (UTC)

Your edits

We seem to have a conflict about whether Wikipedia should say August-December 2021 or NET August 2021 for the Starship orbital test flight. On other pages, something like this isn't used. Usually, missions that doesn't have a certain launch date says NET than a month. We should discuss this. StarshipSLS (Talk ↗), (My Contributions ↗) 15:37, 8 June 2021 (UTC)

ispace's third lunar mission

Hi Yiosie2356, as always thanks for all your effort in updating various launch schedules worldwide. I have a comment regarding the lunar lander company ispace ↗'s third mission. Unlike the first and second, which are branded as the Hakuto-R program, I believe the third mission is yet to be assigned to any program. ispace's presser ↗ about the launch contract with Space X says, ''"The company’s first two lunar missions will be carried out under the program name HAKUTO-R"''. Furthermore, the 'project' page ↗ in ispace's website places Mission 1 and 2 under Hakuto-R, while Missions 3 to 9 are grouped together, separately from Hakuto-R. Mission 1 and 2 are branded as the Hakuto-R program, as a homage to the former team Hakuto ↗. Meanwhile, Mission 3 could mark the start of a new program, or it could just simply be added to Hakuto-R as 'Hakuto-R Mission 3'. As things are undetermined, for now I suggest calling it as 'ispace Mission 3'. Kind regards, Hms1103 (talk) 23:29, 4 August 2021 (UTC)

:Thanks for the heads up. Looking over the links you provided, I agree with your suggestion regarding the naming of ispace Missions. Feel free to make those edits! I'll review the relevant pages myself later. Yiosie 2356 ↗ 01:47, 5 August 2021 (UTC)

🔥 Falcon 9

Link and timestamp of "announcement"?

:I've added the announcement of successful landing ↗ from SpaceX's Twitter to B1062 on the List of Falcon 9 first-stage boosters ↗ page. Yiosie 2356 ↗ 01:14, 16 September 2021 (UTC)

Hwasong-8 launch

Hi, just wondering your ''source'' for the Hwasong-8 launch, as it's '''not''' one of the Iskander-M (KN-23 style missiles we've seen them test in March and mid September (those reached ~60 km). Rather it's a ballistic hypersonic missile, which is '''different''' than a hypersonic cruise missile. You may have them confused. Hypersonic ballistic missiles reach an apogee in space, beyond the 100 and 80 km line, then reach hypersonic speeds on reentry. Hypersonic cruise missiles reach hypersonic speeds in atmosphere and don't reach near the altitude hypersonic ballistic missiles do. This launch (Hwasong-8) is a ''hypersonic ballistic'' type using a hypersonic glide vehicle (HGV) which must be boosted to a high apogee. Again, this isn't a cruise missile and I'm curious about your source of apogee. Thank you.--Jrcraft Yt (talk) 03:06, 29 September 2021 (UTC)

::{{Reply to|Jrcraft Yt}} There are conflicting sources, but 30 km and 60 km are the only given altitudes reported in the media so far. 30 km sources: https://www.japantimes.co.jp/news/2021/09/29/asia-pacific/north-korea-hypersonic-missile/ ↗ https://www.nknews.org/2021/09/north-korea-tested-new-hypersonic-missile-state-media/ ↗. 60 km sources: https://www.thedrive.com/the-war-zone/42560/north-korea-claims-to-have-tested-a-hypersonic-missile ↗ https://m-en.yna.co.kr/view/AEN20210928000455325 ↗. Yiosie 2356 ↗ 03:27, 29 September 2021 (UTC)

::: Source https://m-en.yna.co.kr/view/AEN20210928000455325 ↗, the 60km is referring the the launch on September 15. It states "It did not specify if the projectile is a ballistic missile and has not released such details as its flight range and altitude" in regards to the test on the 28th.--Jrcraft Yt (talk) 03:55, 29 September 2021 (UTC)

Your signature

Your signature appears to be in violation of WP:SIGAPP ↗, which says, "Avoid markup such as {{Tag|big|o}} and {{Tag|span|params=style="font-size: 200%;"|o}}(or more) tags (which {{Big|enlarge}} text); this is likely to disrupt the way that surrounding text displays." —Anomalocaris (talk) 07:12, 7 November 2021 (UTC)

::{{Reply to|Anomalocaris}} Thanks for bringing this to my attention; I have corrected my signature accordingly (it was created in 2011, before WP:SIGAPP ↗ existed). Yiosie 2356 08:08, 7 November 2021 (UTC)

:::Thank you for updating your signature! —Anomalocaris (talk) 19:43, 8 November 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

<table class="messagebox " style="border: 1px solid #AAA; background: ivory; padding: 0.5em; width: 100%;">
<tr><td style="vertical-align:middle; padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em;">40px ↗</td><td>Hello! Voting in the '''2021 Arbitration Committee elections ↗''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2021|end}}-1 day}}. All '''eligible users ↗''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee ↗ is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process ↗. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans ↗, topic bans ↗, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy ↗ describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates ↗ and submit your choices on the '''2021|poll}}|voting page ↗'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:33, 23 November 2021 (UTC)
</td></tr></table>

About my edit

Hi {{u|Yiosie2356}}, [https://en.m.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:MobileDiff/1061698611&markasread=235576071&markasreadwiki=enwiki&diffmode=source ] Chinakpradhan (talk) 10:11, 23 December 2021 (UTC)

I was intending to put the data removed in two separate pages of spaceflight launches Chinakpradhan (talk) 10:12, 23 December 2021 (UTC)

::{{Reply to|Chinakpradhan}} You will need to get consensus from other editors on the article's talk page before starting a large-scale restructuring like that. Yiosie 2356 11:06, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
:::ok Chinakpradhan (talk) 06:08, 24 December 2021 (UTC)

Chandrayaan 3 launch date

Chandrayaan 3 will be launched this year. Some media misunderstood the launch date of Chandrayaan 3 as mid 2023 due to the new year message given by Dr K Sivan. New year message was given on 31st December so they mean Chandrayaan 3 will be launched by the middle of 2022. Even India's Science and Technology Minister has confirmed that Chandrayaan 3 will be launched this year
https://mobile.twitter.com/PBNS_India/status/1481815835006091264?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1481815835006091264%7Ctwgr%5E%7Ctwcon%5Es1_&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fd-21021024743907434976.ampproject.net%2F2112231523002%2Fframe.html Harshdeep2021 (talk) 06:16, 14 January 2022 (UTC)

:{{Reply to|Harshdeep2021}} Thanks for the update. I have reverted the 2023 launch dates back to Q3 2022 on the relevant articles. Yiosie 2356 13:52, 14 January 2022 (UTC)

Hatsune Miku: Colorful Stage! ↗ section didn't violate the rules.

The Reception section, specifically the Controversy part, did not violate the rules about neutrality, reaction from both Japanese and American audience needed to be written (the voice of Japan in this doesn't count?) and also who started it all and everyone knows who, it's a well known fact, not a mystery. That's why there are the sources to prove and validate the content. Plus, I have to report a user that could be a vandal or a block evader previously reported, because they mentioned a site to be a hentai site (it talks about anime, manga and videogames in general, not just hentai) and a homophobic/transphobic site. It's not true at all, it's a big lie and slander trying to smear and invalidate everything, they are the only one who violated those rules. The user is 77.162.37.188 . Thanks. 151.44.78.107 ↗ (talk) 09:38, 2 April 2022 (UTC)

Anyway, with the last version, besides trying to satisfy all disagreements, I also followed the suggestions/requests and corrections from Blue Riband. I hope you agree with my last work on it. — Preceding unsigned ↗ comment added by 151.18.10.217 ↗ (talk) 13:59, 2 April 2022 (UTC) 

Would you join the discussion I had/am having with Blue Rind in his talk page? Because we mentioned you and we thought would be a good idea if you joined us to see. — Preceding unsigned ↗ comment added by 151.34.112.61 ↗ (talk) 16:02, 2 April 2022 (UTC) 

@Yiosie2356 - you might want to look at recent edits to this article again. There's an ISP editor who is claiming vandalism and sockpuppetry. I've asked them to state their disagreement on the article talk page. Blue Riband► 01:49, 26 August 2022 (UTC)

:@Blue Riband - Thanks for the notification. I responded on the talk page. Yiosie 2356 03:31, 26 August 2022 (UTC)

Waiting for your response in the talk page after the post-edit explanation and I'd like to make it quick, please. 151.34.158.249 ↗ (talk) 22:27, 7 September 2022 (UTC)

New project?

I saw that you have a keen interest on current space topic, and I guess that you might found my new Wikipedia:Constellation program ↗ interesting: it's about selecting one of a few articles that would need to be improved to GA and FA. What do you think about the project, and what changes should I make to it? CactiStaccingCrane (talk) 11:19, 27 April 2022 (UTC)

Thanks for your Fix

Thanks for fixing my url mistake in the List of the oldest living people. Rklingmann (talk) 01:14, 31 August 2022 (UTC)

100th birthday citations

Hi {{ping|Yiosie2356}}, 100th birthday citations should be dated from the day the subject turned 100 or after. A week before, or even a day before is not acceptable. I'm not going to revert anymore of your edits, but I ask you replace them with sources that came after their birthday, or self-revert the edits. We're very careful who we put into the centenarian categories nowadays because a lot of individuals die off radar and it isn't revealed until weeks, sometimes even months or years after. Thanks Jkaharper (talk) 00:50, 27 November 2022 (UTC)

:@Jkaharper Understood, thanks for the notification. Yiosie 2356 01:00, 27 November 2022 (UTC)

Note on adding missions to SpaceX

At the top of every year's section there is this long note, but people don't seem to read it and you appeared to have not read it either. Do you have any suggestions so that people such as yourself see it?

<pre></pre>

Ergzay (talk) 00:13, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

:Specifically you missed the part "The main source for the announcement should go after the payload name and not be repeated in other columns." Ergzay (talk) 00:27, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
::@Ergzay You're right, I did miss that part. It seems like my eyes gloss over most of the note due to its length, and that's my bad. To make it more noticeable, I would revise the first three lines as follows:
::1. Only officially announced missions should be listed. No rumors or speculation!
::2. The primary source for the announcement should go directly after the payload name. Do not repeat it in other columns.
::3. The most up-to-date source for the launch date should go directly after the date/time.
::Adding 1-2-3 numbering distinguishes these lines from the following ones, giving them priority for attention. Line 1 gets an exclamation point for emphasis. Lines 2 and 3 have been rewritten to be more direct and to complement each other in structure.
::The rest of the note seems fine to me. What do you think about these suggestions? Yiosie 2356 00:54, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
:::Immediately following writing my message and before your response, I separated the lines and added numbering. How does it look as is? Ergzay (talk) 21:56, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
::::@Ergzay The numbering and spacing are good, though it doesn't seem like the content has been changed. The line rewrites I suggested above are intended to make the rules more direct and flow better for comprehension. If you feel that's unnecessary, then it can be left as is; otherwise, feel free to make changes as you see fit. Yiosie 2356 01:58, 30 November 2022 (UTC)
:::::I didn't have an opinion on your suggested changes. I just wanted to check to see if you thought the changes sufficient. I'll likely adapt your changes either directly or maybe modified. Ergzay (talk) 08:13, 30 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

<div class="ivmbox " style="margin-bottom: 1em; border: 1px solid #AAA; background-color: ivory; padding: 0.5em; display: flex; align-items: center; ">
<div class="ivmbox-image" style="padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em; flex: 1 0 40px;">40px ↗</div>
<div class="ivmbox-text">
Hello! Voting in the '''2022 Arbitration Committee elections ↗''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2022|end}}-1 day}}. All '''eligible users ↗''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee ↗ is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process ↗. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans ↗, topic bans ↗, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy ↗ describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates ↗ and submit your choices on the '''2022|poll}}|voting page ↗'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:10, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

</div>
</div>

About ALE-1

Hi, Yiosie2356, I have a comment regarding the page 2019 in spaceflight ↗, specifically about the ALE-1 satellite. According to N2YO, while the object 'ALE-DOM ↗' has indeed been deorbited, 'ALE-1 ↗' apparently still remains in orbit.

My understanding is the following. ALE-1's initial altitude after separating from its rocket was going to be too high to perform its objective, to release small pellets to burn up in Earth's atmosphere. So ALE-1 carried a deorbit sail called ''SDOM'' (Separable De-Orbit Mechanism) that was used to bring it down to its optimal altitude. According to this paper's ↗ Fig. 17, once ALE-1 reaches its target altitude, SDOM gets separated from it. I assume what's catalogued as 'ALE-DOM' in N2YO is the SDOM after getting jettisoned, while ALE-1 itself has not been deorbited yet. Kind regards, Hms1103 (talk) 19:11, 7 April 2023 (UTC)

:@Hms1103 Thank you for clarifying the distinction between ALE-1 and its de-orbit mechanism! I will revise the edits I made to 2019 in spaceflight ↗ and Innovative Satellite Technology Demonstration Program ↗ accordingly. Yiosie 2356 20:03, 7 April 2023 (UTC)

ITN recognition for P. Sabanayagam ↗

{{ivmbox
|1=On 26 June 2023, '''''In the news ↗''''' was updated with an item that involved the article '''''P. Sabanayagam ↗''''', which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page ↗. —Bagumba (talk) 08:06, 26 June 2023 (UTC)
|2={{Ambox globe current red}}
|imagesize=50px
}}

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

<div class="ivmbox " style="margin-bottom: 1em; border: 1px solid #AAA; background-color: ivory; padding: 0.5em; display: flex; align-items: center; ">
<div class="ivmbox-image" style="padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em; flex: 1 0 40px; max-width: 100px">40px ↗</div>
<div class="ivmbox-text">
Hello! Voting in the '''2023 Arbitration Committee elections ↗''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2023|end}}-1 day}}. All '''eligible users ↗''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee ↗ is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process ↗. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans ↗, topic bans ↗, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy ↗ describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates ↗ and submit your choices on the '''2023|poll}}|voting page ↗'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:35, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

</div>
</div>

IMAP Mission Team

{| style="background-color: #fdffe7; border: 1px solid #fceb92;"
|rowspan="2" style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 5px;" | 100px ↗
|style="font-size: x-large; padding: 3px 3px 0 3px; height: 1.5em;" | '''Appreciation for documentation efforts'''
|-
|style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;" | Hi there, I'm one of the IMAP mission flight controllers, and I wanted to thank you for the updates you've made to the IMAP page here on wikipedia. goldenfool (talk) 17:54, 7 August 2024 (UTC)
|}

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi Yiosie2356. Thank you for your work on RFA One ↗. Another editor, SunDawn, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol ↗ and left the following comment:

{{Bq|1=Thank you for creating the article! I have marked the article as reviewed. Have a blessed day!}}

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{code|<nowiki>{{Re|</nowiki>SunDawn<nowiki>}}</nowiki>}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation ↗ tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

&maltese; SunDawn &maltese; (contact) 16:09, 1 September 2024 (UTC)

Invitation to participate in a research

Hello,

The Wikimedia Foundation is conducting a survey of Wikipedians to better understand what draws administrators to contribute to Wikipedia, and what affects administrator retention. We will use this research to improve experiences for Wikipedians, and address common problems and needs. We have identified you as a good candidate for this research, and would greatly appreciate your participation in this '''anonymous survey ↗'''.

You do not have to be an Administrator to participate.

The survey should take around 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its Meta page ↗ and view its privacy statement ↗ .

Please find our contact on the project Meta page if you have any questions or concerns.

Kind Regards,

WMF Research Team ↗

<bdi lang="en" dir="ltr">BGerdemann (WMF) (talk) 19:27, 23 October 2024 (UTC) </bdi>

Reminder to participate in Wikipedia research

Hello,

I recently invited you to take a survey about administration on Wikipedia. If you haven’t yet had a chance, there is still time to participate– we’d truly appreciate your feedback. The survey is anonymous and should take about 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its Meta page ↗ and view its privacy statement ↗.

Take the survey '''here ↗'''.

Kind Regards,

WMF Research Team ↗

<bdi lang="en" dir="ltr">BGerdemann (WMF) (talk) 00:39, 13 November 2024 (UTC) </bdi>

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

<div class="ivmbox " style="margin-bottom: 1em; border: 1px solid #a2a9b1; background-color: #fdf2d5; padding: 0.5em; display: flex; align-items: center; ">
<div class="ivmbox-image noresize" style="padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em;">40px ↗</div>
<div class="ivmbox-text">
Hello! Voting in the '''2024 Arbitration Committee elections ↗''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2024|end}}-1 day}}. All '''eligible users ↗''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee ↗ is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process ↗. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans ↗, topic bans ↗, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy ↗ describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates ↗ and submit your choices on the '''2024|poll}}|voting page ↗'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:22, 19 November 2024 (UTC)

</div>
</div>

A cup of tea for you!

{| style="background-color: #fdffe7; border: 1px solid #fceb92;"
|style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 5px;" | 120px ↗
|style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;" | thank you sincerely for your contributions!! :) '''x''' RozuRozu • '''''t'''ea'''c'''ups ↗'' 07:47, 29 December 2024 (UTC)

|}

A barnstar for your work!

{| style="border: 1px solid gray; background-color: #fdffe7;"
|rowspan="2" style="vertical-align:middle;" | 100px ↗
|rowspan="2" |
|style="font-size: x-large; padding: 0; vertical-align: middle; height: 1.1em;" | '''The Galactic Republic Barnstar of Merit'''
|-
|style="vertical-align: middle; border-top: 1px solid gray;" | Thank you for your work on the Star Wars Video Games Article! '''Valorrr (lets chat)''' 16:57, 20 April 2025 (UTC)
|}

Cite copying

Hi, I saw the citation you made for the 'Untitled ''Backyard Sports ↗'' game' column and I decided to copy it to use in the ''Backyard Sports'' page for the paragraph talking about Playground Productions' plans in releasing games. Is that alright? 2603:6010:8B00:44FF:9D2B:8033:926E:A143 ↗ (talk) 05:20, 31 May 2025 (UTC)

:No need for permission to reuse a citation; go ahead and use it. Yiosie 2356 07:33, 31 May 2025 (UTC)
::Thanks. I kind of thought I didn't need to, but I wasn't entirely sure. I did credit you as the one who made the cite when I copied it though. 2603:6010:8B00:44FF:9AA:47AA:3ED0:7F96 ↗ (talk) 15:51, 31 May 2025 (UTC)

Welcome to the drive!

Welcome, welcome, welcome Yiosie2356! I'm glad that you are joining the June 2025 drive ↗! Please, have a cup of WikiTea, and go cite some articles.
{{center|{{Clickable button 2|Special:RandomInCategory/All articles lacking sources|Fix a random page lacking sources|class=mw-ui-progressive}}|style=margin:1em}} Cielquiparle (talk) 04:35, 1 June 2025 (UTC)

Substack Edit Help

Hi Yiosie2356, nice to meet you! I saw that you are a part of WP:INTERNET ↗ and have been really helpful on a number of pages. I've been working to update the article about Substack ↗, and I was hoping you would take a look at the edit request I posted here ↗. If you agree that the changes improve the article, would you mind implementing them?

Thank you, LS4Substack (talk) 13:33, 11 June 2025 (UTC)

== June 2025 WikiProject Unreferenced articles backlog drive – award ==

{| style="border: 1px solid grey; background-color: #fdffe7;"
|rowspan="2" style="vertical-align:middle;" | 100px ↗
|rowspan="2" |
|style="font-size: x-large; padding: 0; vertical-align: middle; height: 1.1em;" |
'''Citation Barnstar'''
|-
|style="vertical-align: middle; border-top: 1px solid gray; width:100%;" |
This award is given in recognition to {{BASEPAGENAME}} for collecting more than 106.0 points during the WikiProject Unreferenced articles ↗'s JUN25 ↗ backlog drive. Your contributions played a crucial role in sourcing over 9,500 unsourced articles during the drive. Thank you so much for participating and helping to reduce the backlog! – '''Dream'''Rimmer Alt ■ 15:50, 14 July 2025 (UTC)
|}

Allowing the Africans to speak for themselves is a violation of NPOV?

Good to know. You racists are truly disgusting. ~ Peter1c (talk) 18:10, 9 August 2025 (UTC)

:For context, this user believes that {{diff|Alliance of Sahel States|prev|1305036157|this revert}} I made on Alliance of Sahel States ↗ for WP:NPOV ↗, which reverted the line "restore colonial rule after a successful anticolonial revolution in Niger" back to "restore civilian rule after a coup in Niger", makes me a disgusting racist who doesn't allow Africans to speak for themselves. I reject that characterization and let ''this'' speak for itself. Yiosie 2356 04:33, 10 August 2025 (UTC)

007 First Light genre

I've seen your edit ↗ for the article about the video game 007 First Light ↗. What part of the gameplay trailer (or "reveal") (I've watched it, by the way) shows adventure ↗ elements? FSlolhehe (talk) 00:39, 5 September 2025 (UTC)

:Also, your edit violates WP:V ↗ and WP:NOR ↗ FSlolhehe (talk) 00:45, 5 September 2025 (UTC)
:@FSlolhehe 007 First Light is called an action-adventure game by multiple reliable sources, including the developers themselves: IO Interactive ↗, IGN ↗, Xbox Wire ↗, Gamereactor ↗, etc. All verifiable and not original research. Yiosie 2356 03:44, 5 September 2025 (UTC)

Speedy deletion ↗ nomination of :Category:Video game companies established in 2025 ↗

48px|left|alt=|link= ↗

A tag has been placed on :Category:Video game companies established in 2025 ↗ indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category ↗, a category redirect ↗, under discussion at Categories for discussion ↗, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion ↗.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may '''contest the nomination''' by visiting the page ↗ and removing the speedy deletion tag.   '''''L'''''iz '''''Read!''''' ↗ '''''Talk!''''' 23:39, 12 September 2025 (UTC)

ArbCom 2025 Elections voter message

<div class="ivmbox " style="margin-bottom: 1em; border: 1px solid #a2a9b1; background-color: #fdf2d5; padding: 0.5em; display: flex; align-items: center; ">
<div class="ivmbox-image" style="padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em;flex-basis: 40px">40px ↗</div>
<div class="ivmbox-text">
Hello! Voting in the '''2025 Arbitration Committee elections ↗''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2025|end}}-1 day}}. All '''eligible users ↗''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee ↗ is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process ↗. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans ↗, topic bans ↗, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy ↗ describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please review the candidates ↗ and submit your choices on the '''2025|poll}}|voting page ↗'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:32, 18 November 2025 (UTC)

</div>
</div>

Artemis Accords Members.svg

Hi, I created the updated map of Artemis members so that it can be used consistently across all relevant Wikipedia pages. The map reflects the most recent information from NASA's official list of member states. https://www.nasa.gov/artemis-accords/ ↗ https://www.nasa.gov/organizations/oiir/artemis-accords/nasa-celebrates-five-years-of-artemis-accords-welcomes-3-new-nations/ ↗
I also want to note that my map was reused without attribution, which is required under the CC-BY license. The version that was uploaded also contains inaccuracies, for example, it incorrectly shows Latvia as a member (it might have signed but officially according to previous urls, still haven't joined). So there's really no need to change the file just to show it's the one you uploaded. You could have followed the proper procedure described at :Commons:Overwriting existing files/Requests ↗ to override the file if you needed to update it, so that it ensures the correct attribution and accuracy. Btw the file can now be overridden, so feel free to update it if you like, provided, of course, that the countries shown have actually joined the Accord. Thank you. Yacine Boussoufa (Write me!) 17:50, 22 November 2025 (UTC)

:@Yacine Boussoufa Thank you for letting me know; I have added Latvia to your map based on https://spacenews.com/latvia-signs-artemis-accords/ ↗. NASA's websites haven't been properly updated due to the government shutdown, and signing is equivalent to joining the Accords as far as I can tell (case in point: Philippines is listed and mentioned on the image caption in NASA's list ↗ with the signing date noted). Yiosie 2356 20:35, 22 November 2025 (UTC)
::Tho the same link you shared says "A NASA spokesperson said Nov. 3 that Latvia has agreed to sign the Accords but has yet to formally sign." which means Latvia has not yet signed but only said that they "wish to join" Yacine Boussoufa (Write me!) 21:48, 22 November 2025 (UTC)
::Hello @Yiosie2356 , thank you for your work on this article. I have uploaded a new map that I created to show India’s borders, including Jammu & Kashmir and Arunachal Pradesh, in a more accurate manner. If you have any concerns or suggestions for further improvement, please let me know so we can refine it together. Ravimahiind (talk) 09:00, 2 February 2026 (UTC)
:::I edited and replaced the previous map to include your changes. Since these are technically disputed areas, I left the map open to reversion if this is considered controversial by other users. If it is reverted, you can post your concerns in the Artemis Accords ↗ talk page. Yiosie 2356 19:05, 2 February 2026 (UTC)
::::Thanks for the clarification. I would like to understand the rationale for omitting Jammu & Kashmir and Arunachal Pradesh in the first place. From India’s official position and authoritative cartographic sources, these regions are integral parts of India, and excluding them introduces a perspective bias rather than neutrality.
::::If areas are considered disputed, that should be addressed through clear labeling or notes—not omission. Removing them entirely misrepresents India’s borders and implicitly reflects one geopolitical viewpoint. I believe the map should aim for balanced representation aligned with reliable sources rather than selective exclusion. Ravimahiind (talk) 20:29, 2 February 2026 (UTC)

Pathologic 3 ↗ moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Pathologic 3 ↗. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing as a live article at this time because '''it has no sources''' and '''it needs more sources to establish notability'''.
I have converted it to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page ↗.
When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. aesurias ''(ping me in your reply, or I won't see it)'' (talk) 05:13, 10 January 2026 (UTC)

Kinki Spiritual Affairs Bureau

Hey Thank you for fixing kinki spiritual affairs bureau MiniMimas2 (talk) 20:00, 2 March 2026 (UTC)

Hello

Hello I come in peace but I am Genuinly Curious and confused on what you said about papa japa. Now I know that it would be removed however its reason is a little confusing because the first game is noteable, the second game is not a game mode and the third game does have a release date and a source to back it up? so That confuses me a little but all respectful ~2026-15867-61 ↗ (talk) 07:53, 13 March 2026 (UTC)

:For that specific revision, "first game" refers to ''Papa Japa 3'' (not notable; see Wikipedia:Independent sources ↗ and Wikipedia:WikiProject Video games/Sources#Reliable sources ↗), "second game" refers to ''Fortnite: Save The World ↗'' (a game mode for the Fortnite platform; should not be added as a separate game, akin to ''Call of Duty Zombies ↗''), and "third game" refers to ''Harvest Moon: Echoes of Teradea'' (source says there is no release date at the moment; game already added to List of video games in development ↗). Yiosie 2356 10:20, 13 March 2026 (UTC)

Listing for discussion of :Template:Latest stable software release/Yandex Browser ↗

30px|link=|alt= ↗ :Template:Latest stable software release/Yandex Browser ↗ has been listed for discussion ↗, which may result in the template being merged ↗ or deleted ↗ by consensus ↗. You are invited to comment on the proposed action at '''the entry on the Templates for discussion page''' ↗. Gonnym (talk) 08:30, 13 May 2026 (UTC)