W
Active Editors
Back to Profile

User Talk: Anteosaurus magnificus

Server-side rendered snapshot of this editor's Wikipedia talk page discussions.


Welcome!





Hi Anteosaurus magnificus! I noticed your contributions ↗ and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

{{Clickable button 2|Help:Introduction|Learn more about editing|class=mw-ui-progressive|style=margin-left: 1.6em;}}

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia ↗ page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

{{Clickable button 2|Wikipedia:Teahouse|Get help at the Teahouse|style=margin-left: 1.6em;}}

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

{{Clickable button 2|Wikipedia:Task Center|Volunteer at the Task Center|style=margin-left: 1.6em;}}

Please remember to sign your messages on talk page ↗s by typing four tildes (<nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! <!-- Template:Welcome--> '''<span style="color:#ffb400;">Poppi</span><span style="color:#536980;">fied</span>''' <sup><i style="color:skyblue">talk</i></sup> 05:18, 8 March 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 25



Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Benito Mussolini ↗, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Fascist Italy ↗<!-- ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Benito_Mussolini check to confirm]&nbsp;|&nbsp;[//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Benito_Mussolini?client=notify fix with Dab solver])-->. Such links are usually incorrect ↗, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. <small>(Read the FAQ{{*}} Join us at the DPL WikiProject ↗.)</small>

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:06, 25 March 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 4



An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Henry Clay ↗, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Attorney ↗<!-- ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Henry_Clay check to confirm]&nbsp;|&nbsp;[//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Henry_Clay?client=notify fix with Dab solver])-->.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:07, 4 April 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message



<table class="messagebox " style="border: 1px solid #AAA; background: ivory; padding: 0.5em; width: 100%;">
<tr><td style="vertical-align:middle; padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em;">40px ↗</td><td>Hello! Voting in the '''2021 Arbitration Committee elections ↗''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2021|end}}-1 day}}. All '''eligible users ↗''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee ↗ is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process ↗. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans ↗, topic bans ↗, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy ↗ describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates ↗ and submit your choices on the '''2021|poll}}|voting page ↗'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. <small>MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:04, 23 November 2021 (UTC)</small>
</td></tr>
</table>
<!-- Message sent by User:Cyberpower678@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2021/Coordination/MM/09&oldid=1056563540 -->

Edit summary



25px|alt=Information icon|link= ↗ Hello. Thank you for your contributions ↗ to Wikipedia ↗.

{{The edit-summary field|new=y}}

You can use the edit summary field to explain your reasoning for an edit, or provide a description of what the edit changes. Summaries save time for other editors and reduce the chances your edit will be misunderstood. For some edits a summary may be quite brief ↗.

'''Please provide an edit summary for every edit you make.''' With a Wikipedia account ↗ you can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting {{myprefs|3|check=Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary}}.
Thanks!{{sp}}<!-- Template:uw-editsummary --> Fettlemap (talk) 01:53, 27 March 2022 (UTC)

April 2022



25px|alt=Information icon ↗ Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced ↗ information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living (or recently deceased) persons ↗, as you did to :Aung San Suu Kyi ↗. Thank you.<!-- Template:uw-biog2 --> ―&nbsp;<span style="color:#990000">'''''Tartan357'''''</span>&nbsp;<sup><span style="color:#224434">'''Talk'''</span></sup> 19:27, 2 April 2022 (UTC)

Category additions



Hello, please do not add categories to pages where there is not an overwhelming consensus that they apply, like you did to several articles such as Christopher Columbus ↗; see the relevant guideline ↗. You might also want to read the essay beware of the tigers ↗; if you keep editing the way you have been recently, you may be tranquilised (i.e. blocked). '''Graham'''<span style="color: green;">87</span> 03:45, 3 April 2022 (UTC)

Overlinking



25px|alt=Information icon ↗ Thank you for your contributions ↗ to Wikipedia. In your recent edit to :Jonkeria ↗, you added links ↗ to an article which did not add content or meaning, or repeated the same link several times throughout the article. Please see Wikipedia's guideline on links ↗ to avoid overlinking. Thank you. <!-- Template:uw-linking --> '''Graham'''<span style="color: green;">87</span> 04:21, 3 April 2022 (UTC)

Washington's Genocide of Iroquois



I agree with your comments in the George Washington article.

On 2022 February 12 I tried to highlight the genocide of the Sullivan expedition. It was reverted 2022 February 17 on grounds there was only one source. if you know of other sources, I'd appreciate knowing them.

I have also tried to reduce the hagiography in the article about Andrew Jackson but met resistance. His attitude to the south-eastern tribes was just as bad.

Humphrey Tribble (talk) 16:01, 8 April 2022 (UTC)

Agüero, Huesca ↗


Please don't wp:OVERLINK ↗. Most people know what a church, a hotel, and a village are. Someone reading the article is unlikely to need to find further info on those items. Please stop. Thank you Adakiko (talk) 03:04, 12 August 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of :Carboniferous-Earliest Permian Biodiversification Event ↗ for deletion


<div class="afd-notice">
<div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">48px|alt=|link= ↗</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ''':Carboniferous-Earliest Permian Biodiversification Event ↗''' is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines ↗ or whether it should be deleted ↗.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Carboniferous-Earliest Permian Biodiversification Event ↗ until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.
<!-- Template:Afd notice --></div> Hemiauchenia (talk) 17:39, 12 September 2022 (UTC)

Communication is not optional



See Wikipedia:Communication is required ↗. If people disagree with your content contributions, you are supposed to respond, not just ignore it. Hemiauchenia (talk) 15:36, 23 September 2022 (UTC)

TOAE



I merged the TOAE article (which was titled "Toarcian Turnover" https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Toarcian_turnover&oldid=992934963 ↗) into the Jurassic article nearly 2 years ago as it had very little content. If you're interested in writing about the TOAE it may be advisable to recreate the article (ideally under a different title, like Toarcian Oceanic Anoxic Event) and expand that, as the main Jurassic article should ideally only be a high-level summary, while an article dedicated to the topic could go more in depth. Hemiauchenia (talk) 22:41, 29 October 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message



<div class="ivmbox " style="margin-bottom: 1em; border: 1px solid #AAA; background-color: ivory; padding: 0.5em; display: flex; align-items: center; ">
<div class="ivmbox-image" style="padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em; flex: 1 0 40px;">40px ↗</div>
<div class="ivmbox-text">
Hello! Voting in the '''2022 Arbitration Committee elections ↗''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2022|end}}-1 day}}. All '''eligible users ↗''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee ↗ is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process ↗. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans ↗, topic bans ↗, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy ↗ describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates ↗ and submit your choices on the '''2022|poll}}|voting page ↗'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. <small>MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:50, 29 November 2022 (UTC)</small>

</div>
</div>
<!-- Message sent by User:Xaosflux@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2022/Coordination/MM/08&oldid=1124425185 -->

Discretionary alerts


J. K. Rowling ↗ is under double discretionary sanctions; please be sure to understand the restrictions on editing there. '''Sandy'''<span style="color: green;">Georgia</span> (Talk) 20:59, 19 December 2022 (UTC)
{{ivmbox | image = Commons-emblem-notice.svg |imagesize=50px | bg = #E5F8FF | text = This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. ''It does '''not''' imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.''

You have shown interest in '''gender-related disputes or controversies or in people associated with them.''' Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions ↗ is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions ↗ on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies ↗, or the page-specific restrictions ↗, when making edits related to the topic.

To opt out of receiving messages like this one, place {{tlx|Ds/aware}} on your user talk page and specify in the template the topic areas that you would like to opt out of alerts about. For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions ↗ and the Arbitration Committee's ↗ decision here ↗. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
}}<!-- Derived from Template:Ds/alert -->
{{ivmbox | image = Commons-emblem-notice.svg |imagesize=50px | bg = #E5F8FF | text = This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. ''It does '''not''' imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.''

You have shown interest in '''articles about living or recently deceased people ↗, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles.''' Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions ↗ is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions ↗ on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies ↗, or the page-specific restrictions ↗, when making edits related to the topic.

To opt out of receiving messages like this one, place {{tlx|Ds/aware}} on your user talk page and specify in the template the topic areas that you would like to opt out of alerts about. For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions ↗ and the Arbitration Committee's ↗ decision here ↗. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
}}<!-- Derived from Template:Ds/alert -->

A barnstar for you!



{| style="background-color: #fdffe7; border: 1px solid #fceb92;"
|rowspan="2" style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 5px;" | 100px ↗
|style="font-size: x-large; padding: 3px 3px 0 3px; height: 1.5em;" | '''The Original Barnstar'''
|-
|style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;" | Dasberg Event is a very good article. Well done! BoyTheKingCanDance (talk) 01:30, 25 March 2023 (UTC)
|}

Disambiguation link notification for April 22



An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Capitanian mass extinction event ↗, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Anoxia ↗<!-- ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Capitanian_mass_extinction_event check to confirm]&nbsp;|&nbsp;[//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Capitanian_mass_extinction_event?client=notify fix with Dab solver])-->.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:28, 22 April 2023 (UTC)

CS1 error on Serpukhovian ↗


25px|alt=|link= ↗ Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have '''automatically detected''' that this edit ↗ performed by you, on the page :Serpukhovian ↗, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive ↗, you can [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:Qwerfjkl/Botpreload&editintro=User:Qwerfjkl/boteditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:Qwerfjkl&preloadtitle=Qwerfjkl%20(bot)%20–%20Qwerfjkl_(bot)&section=new report it to my operator].
Thanks, <!-- User:Qwerfjkl (bot)/inform -->Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 17:49, 23 April 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of :Grover Furr ↗ for deletion


<div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">48px|alt=|link= ↗</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article :Grover Furr ↗, to which you have significantly contributed ↗, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines ↗ or if it should be deleted ↗.

The discussion will take place at '''Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Grover Furr (2nd nomination) ↗''' until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by ''SDZeroBot'' (talk) 01:01, 12 May 2023 (UTC)<!-- User:SDZeroBot/AfD notifier/template -->

CS1 error on Triassic–Jurassic extinction event ↗


25px|alt=|link= ↗ Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have '''automatically detected''' that this edit ↗ performed by you, on the page :Triassic–Jurassic extinction event ↗, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive ↗, you can [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:Qwerfjkl/Botpreload&editintro=User:Qwerfjkl/boteditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:Qwerfjkl&preloadtitle=Qwerfjkl%20(bot)%20–%20Qwerfjkl_(bot)&section=new report it to my operator].
Thanks, <!-- User:Qwerfjkl (bot)/inform -->Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 02:12, 31 May 2023 (UTC)

CS1 error on Paquier Event ↗


25px|alt=|link= ↗ Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have '''automatically detected''' that this edit ↗ performed by you, on the page :Paquier Event ↗, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive ↗, you can [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:Qwerfjkl/Botpreload&editintro=User:Qwerfjkl/boteditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:Qwerfjkl&preloadtitle=Qwerfjkl%20(bot)%20–%20Qwerfjkl_(bot)&section=new report it to my operator].
Thanks, <!-- User:Qwerfjkl (bot)/inform -->Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 01:52, 14 June 2023 (UTC)

June 2023



30px|link= ↗ You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war ↗. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate ↗ with others, to avoid editing disruptively ↗, and to try to reach a consensus ↗, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:
# '''Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;'''
# '''Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.'''
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page ↗ to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard ↗ or seek dispute resolution ↗. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection ↗. If you engage in an edit war, you '''may be blocked ↗ from editing.''' <!-- Template:uw-ew --> Hemiauchenia (talk) 01:05, 24 June 2023 (UTC)

:Hello, Anteosaurus magnificus,
:If an editor reverts your edit, it's not a sign that you should then revert them! You need to go to the article talk page and get a consensus for the change you want to make. Edit-warring or move-warring can result in a block so please don't be persistent here. I'd rather not block you. Thank you. <span style="font-family:Papyrus; color:#800080;">'''''L'''''iz</span> <sup style="font-family: Times New Roman; color: #006400;">'''''Read!''''' ↗ '''''Talk!'''''</sup> 01:20, 24 June 2023 (UTC)
:: I think the best path forward here would either to create a broader article about the extinction event, separate from the TOAE article, or attempt to gain broader consensus for the move using the instructions at Wikipedia:Requested_moves#Requesting_controversial_and_potentially_controversial_moves ↗. Hemiauchenia (talk) 01:24, 24 June 2023 (UTC)

CS1 error on Great Ordovician Biodiversification Event ↗


25px|alt=|link= ↗ Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have '''automatically detected''' that this edit ↗ performed by you, on the page :Great Ordovician Biodiversification Event ↗, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive ↗, you can [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:Qwerfjkl/Botpreload&editintro=User:Qwerfjkl/boteditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:Qwerfjkl&preloadtitle=Qwerfjkl%20(bot)%20–%20Qwerfjkl_(bot)&section=new report it to my operator].
Thanks, <!-- User:Qwerfjkl (bot)/inform -->Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 22:29, 4 July 2023 (UTC)

CS1 error on Pliocene ↗


25px|alt=|link= ↗ Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have '''automatically detected''' that this edit ↗ performed by you, on the page :Pliocene ↗, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive ↗, you can [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:Qwerfjkl/Botpreload&editintro=User:Qwerfjkl/boteditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:Qwerfjkl&preloadtitle=Qwerfjkl%20(bot)%20–%20Qwerfjkl_(bot)&section=new report it to my operator].
Thanks, <!-- User:Qwerfjkl (bot)/inform -->Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 02:35, 7 July 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion ↗ nomination of :Category:Oceanic anoxic events ↗


48px|left|alt=|link= ↗

A tag has been placed on :Category:Oceanic anoxic events ↗ indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category ↗, a category redirect ↗, a featured topics category ↗, under discussion at Categories for discussion ↗, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion ↗.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may '''contest the nomination''' by visiting the page ↗ and removing the speedy deletion tag. <!-- Template:Db-catempty-notice --> <!-- Template:Db-csd-notice-custom --> <span style="font-family:Papyrus; color:#800080;">'''''L'''''iz</span> <sup style="font-family: Times New Roman; color: #006400;">'''''Read!''''' ↗ '''''Talk!'''''</sup> 04:53, 9 August 2023 (UTC)

Cookie



{{cookie}} Benjamin (talk) 10:58, 4 September 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message



<div class="ivmbox " style="margin-bottom: 1em; border: 1px solid #AAA; background-color: ivory; padding: 0.5em; display: flex; align-items: center; ">
<div class="ivmbox-image" style="padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em; flex: 1 0 40px; max-width: 100px">40px ↗</div>
<div class="ivmbox-text">
Hello! Voting in the '''2023 Arbitration Committee elections ↗''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2023|end}}-1 day}}. All '''eligible users ↗''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee ↗ is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process ↗. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans ↗, topic bans ↗, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy ↗ describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates ↗ and submit your choices on the '''2023|poll}}|voting page ↗'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. <small>MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:55, 28 November 2023 (UTC)</small>

</div>
</div>
<!-- Message sent by User:Illusion Flame@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2023/Coordination/MM/08&oldid=1187132475 -->

Disambiguation link notification for January 14



An automated process has detectedthat when you recently edited Denisova Cave ↗, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Eurasian cave lion ↗.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:48, 14 January 2024 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 2



An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Logan (Iroquois leader) ↗, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Agree ↗, Killed ↗ and Affiliated ↗.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:52, 2 September 2024 (UTC)

Some reading for you



Wikipedia:Automated taxobox system ↗ YorkshireExpat (talk) 20:02, 16 September 2024 (UTC)

:Template:Taxonomy/Megaviverra ↗ YorkshireExpat (talk) 21:02, 19 September 2024 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started



Hi Anteosaurus magnificus. Thank you for your work on Messelopython ↗. Another editor, Hughesdarren, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol ↗ and left the following comment:

{{Bq|1=Hi there, I'm not a taxonomist but I'm guessing that the genus messelopython is a part of the Pythonidae family and wrote the taxobox accordingly. If this is not the case please let me know which family I need and I'll fix it up. Thanks for your work, taxoboxes are difficult to work but if you need any help in the future then drop me a line. Regards}}

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{code|<nowiki>{{Re|</nowiki>Hughesdarren<nowiki>}}</nowiki>}}. <small>(Message delivered via the Page Curation ↗ tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)</small><!-- Template:Sentnote-NPF -->

Hughesdarren (talk) 06:02, 4 October 2024 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started



Hi Anteosaurus magnificus. Thank you for your work on Tartaruscola ↗. Another editor, Hughesdarren, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol ↗ and left the following comment:

{{Bq|1=Fixed this one too, let me know if i got it wrong....Cheers}}

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{code|<nowiki>{{Re|</nowiki>Hughesdarren<nowiki>}}</nowiki>}}. <small>(Message delivered via the Page Curation ↗ tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)</small><!-- Template:Sentnote-NPF -->

Hughesdarren (talk) 06:08, 4 October 2024 (UTC)

Request for assessment



I see that you have requested assessment of a bulk of pages here ↗. By putting them in one large request, it will make it very difficult for us to keep track of what we have assessed and what remains to be done. Please delete your current request and re add them one by one as separate requests. Also ensure that you sign each request, as it appears your current one did not sign properly. Ktkvtsh (talk) 17:50, 13 October 2024 (UTC)

Request for assessment



It looks like you just added a bunch of articles, most of which you have not significantly edited (looked at a couple and it looks like you added a few links, did some cleanup, added a statement, etc.). Requests for assessment is usually for articles people don't want to rate themselves because they wrote them, or because they are unsure. If you believe an article deserves a higher rating based on the descriptions and did not significantly edit it (or even if you did), you can just set it to the higher rating. If you are unsure about some articles, I think it would be better to ask for a few 2nd opinions and then use that information to rate the rest. The description on the Requests for Assessment page says "If you have made significant changes to an article and would like an outside opinion on a new rating for it, please feel free to list it below." -- this isn't really what it's intended for, and it makes it less likely that the pages people have difficulty rating themselves will get second opinions.

I'm going to remove them per it not really being the point of the whole thing but feel free to add any back if you did write a significant portion of them or are unsure about the rating. Mrfoogles (talk) 23:11, 25 October 2024 (UTC)

:@Anteosaurus magnificus please stop adding so many articles to the "Requested assessments". It's filling up the whole thing, and given there are so many and so few people who are active there few of them are going to get reviewed anyway. It's probably better to just rate the articles yourself if there are so many; there are not enough people reviewing articles are Requested assessments to review them all. Maybe just add the few you edited the most/are unsure about? Mrfoogles (talk) 20:28, 8 December 2024 (UTC)

Rater assessment tool


@Anteosaurus magnificus - to "self-assess" an article, please install ''User:Evad37/rater'' tool. It is very helpful as I use daily after updating my favorite WikiProject articles and reviewing Long stub articles ↗. FYI - @Mrfoogles. Regards, JoeNMLC (talk) 09:14, 17 December 2024 (UTC)

Article assessments


{{notice|Greetings, In addition to requesting article assessments, please consider doing an assessment of one (or more) articles in the backlog. For introduction to assessments, see Assessment information ↗; you can help! ↗. Regards, JoeNMLC (talk) 16:55, 28 December 2024 (UTC) }}

Minimum taxobox parameters



Hi, if you look at [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Boritia&oldid=1256047225 this old version of ''Boritia''] that you created, you'll see that although the taxobox shows the genus, which it picks up from the page title by default, the page title is not italicized. Full functionality of species boxes requires the genus to be explicitly specified, in this case either by a combination of {{para|genus|Boritia}} and {{para|species|duffaudi}} or by {{para|taxon|Boritia duffaudi}}. So when I added {{para|species|duffaudi}}, the title was correctly italicized at ''Boritia ↗''. Keep up the good work! Peter coxhead (talk) 10:22, 8 November 2024 (UTC)

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message



<div class="ivmbox " style="margin-bottom: 1em; border: 1px solid #a2a9b1; background-color: #fdf2d5; padding: 0.5em; display: flex; align-items: center; ">
<div class="ivmbox-image noresize" style="padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em;">40px ↗</div>
<div class="ivmbox-text">
Hello! Voting in the '''2024 Arbitration Committee elections ↗''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2024|end}}-1 day}}. All '''eligible users ↗''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee ↗ is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process ↗. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans ↗, topic bans ↗, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy ↗ describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates ↗ and submit your choices on the '''2024|poll}}|voting page ↗'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. <small>MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:44, 19 November 2024 (UTC)</small>

</div>
</div>
<!-- Message sent by User:Cyberpower678@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2024/Coordination/MM/07&oldid=1258243692 -->

Please create taxonomy templates



Hi, when you create articles like ''Ningchengodon ↗'', it's your responsibility to create the taxonomy template that will make the taxobox work, and not leave the article with a broken taxobox. Click on the "fix" link in the taxobox, and a partial taxonomy template will be created. As a minimum you need to add a rank and the parent taxon. Ideally also add a citation – use the reference you put in the article without the ref tags. It's really not difficult. Please don't leave articles for others to clean up in this way. Peter coxhead (talk) 19:38, 15 December 2024 (UTC)

Extinct



Hi. When you create a taxonomy template for a taxon that is extinct, please mark it with <code>|extinct=yes</code>. See my correction to a template you created here ↗ as an example. Thanks. YorkshireExpat (talk) 17:11, 5 January 2025 (UTC)

Paleospecies in extant genera



Hi there. I have just redirected a bunch of paleospecies stubs you created (7 larks, a sitella and a murre) to their respective genus articles. Please be aware of that there is a pretty firm consensus ↗ in the Paleo project that there is no benefit in having standalone stubs for paleospecies without exceptional coverage, as there is precious little chance that they will ever be substantially expanded (this is in contrast to how extant species are treated). These should instead be covered at the genus level. It especially applies to paleospecies in ''extant'' genera, where the genus article is generally much more informative than that stub could ever be. - Accordingly, I have also removed the speculative redlinks in paleospecies lists in a couple of these genus articles, as they are not going to be blued following our current approach.

I'm sorry to negate your work of creating these stubs, but I suggest that in future you do not engage in making these, as it's going to be a bit of a waste of effort. Cheers --<span style="font-family:Courier">Elmidae</span> <small>(talk · contribs ↗)</small> 19:05, 1 February 2025 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 2



An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Rhodesian Bush War ↗, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Cold War History ↗.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:52, 2 February 2025 (UTC)

Hi there!


Hi! Thank you so much for all the pages of more obscure prehistoric vertebrates that you have recently created. It's a really big help. Just some suggestions for extra information to add, though these aren't completely necessary. Just to increase the connectedness between pages and populate some underused categories.
Thanks again! Geekgecko (talk) 01:48, 12 February 2025 (UTC)

A brownie for you!



{| style="background-color: var(--background-color-success-subtle, #fdffe7); border: 1px solid var(--border-color-success, #fceb92); color: var(--color-base, #202122);"
|style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 5px;" | 120px ↗
|style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;" | Thank you for creating ''Chilomycterus dzonotensis ↗''. Have a nice day! <span style="color: purple;">🌙'''Eclipse'''</span> (she/they/it/other neos ↗ • talk • edits ↗) 21:14, 15 February 2025 (UTC)
|}

A goat for you!



left|150px ↗
Thank you for suggesting articles to be reassessed!

<span style="color:#4B0082; font-weight:bold;">Kt</span><span style="color:#008080; font-weight:bold;">kv</span><span style="color:#B8860B; font-weight:bold;">tsh</span> <span style="color:#555;">(talk)</span> 05:37, 18 February 2025 (UTC)
<br style="clear: both;"/>

Stub articles



Greetings Anteosaurus magnificus, FYI - at ''WikiProject Wikipedia/Assessment'', your recent request for article, Dama clactoniana ↗, please be aware of "Prose size" as one of the criteria for a stub-class assessment. See here ↗ for details. That article contains (178 words) "readable prose size" so remains a stub until content to be about 250 words level or more. Regards, JoeNMLC (talk) 18:52, 25 February 2025 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 28



An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Gerald Mayr ↗, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Condor ↗.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:54, 28 February 2025 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started



Hi Anteosaurus magnificus. Thank you for your work on Tamiops minor ↗. Another editor, SunloungerFrog, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol ↗ and left the following comment:

{{Bq|1=Do you have an exact page for ''Tamiops minor'' in the Palaeontologia Sinica source please?}}

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{code|<nowiki>{{Re|</nowiki>SunloungerFrog<nowiki>}}</nowiki>}}. <small>(Message delivered via the Page Curation ↗ tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)</small><!-- Template:Sentnote-NPF -->

SunloungerFrog (talk) 07:20, 11 June 2025 (UTC)

:{{Re|SunloungerFrog}} I do not have the exact page for the description, as I simply copied and pasted the Palaeontologia Sinica reference from the page 2016 in mammal paleontology ↗ into the page ''Tamiops minor ↗'' as I was creating the latter, and as of right now, I do not currently have access to the pages of that source from my home computer. That said, I could someday try to see if I could access it from a computer in a library that would have access to these sorts of paywalled and difficult-to-access sources online. Anteosaurus magnificus (talk) 18:38, 11 June 2025 (UTC)
::It would be a nice touch to add it at some point if you are able, for ease of future verification. Cheers SunloungerFrog (talk) 22:03, 11 June 2025 (UTC)

New page creations and formatting



Hello, I've noticed that you have created the Wikipedia pages for many extinct taxa. Your efforts are appreciated but there are several aspects of your approach that need to change for optimal clarity on Wikipedia, and to prevent causing extra work for other editors. Your pages are created by plugging basic information into a consistent 'template'. There's nothing wrong with this—that's how I do it, too—but the 'template' you use is problematic.
In general, please keep in mind that Wikipedia is supposed to provide accessible and clear content to readers. If you are not already familiar with it, you should meet the requirements to access the Wikipedia Library ↗, which should grant access to most of the papers describing the taxa you write about. Using this resource, your pages could include additional basic information (etymology, discovery context, simple description of notability, anatomy, etc.). These are not critical but are simple additions that would allow readers to actually gain some insight from your pages. I am happy to provide any assistance or further guidance if desired. Happy editing, -SlvrHwk (talk) 06:08, 31 July 2025 (UTC)

:It seems you have entirely ignored the concerns raised above. These are not polite suggestions, but serious requests, as cleaning up from your editing behavior is causing additional unnecessary work for other editors. I will also ask that if you make requests at WP:TREEREQ ↗, please only ask for parts of the tree(s) that will be constructive to the page they will be added to. I just removed significant portions of the cladograms added to ''Massetognathus ↗'' and ''Shamosuchus ↗'' because there was no benefit to including every one of those taxa. Asking for the full tree is an unreasonable amount of work for other editors if it is not going to be put to good use. Not to mention, the tree requested for the latter is dated by more than 15 years, and does not accurately portray the current understanding of this animal's affinities. There are abundant options that are more up-to-date (e.g., https://doi.org/10.1080%2F02724634.2025.2542185 ↗) and would be more constructive for the page. -SlvrHwk (talk) 17:35, 22 October 2025 (UTC)
::@SlvrHwk I have not ignored the requests raised above; I have been adding more lay descriptions (i.e. "''Storchipedetes'' is an extinct genus of pedetid rodent", highlighting both the taxonomic family but also a broader clade like Rodentia that a general reader is likely to be familiar with) of the taxa I create new pages for, and I usually remember to add the descriptions (I forgot to do so for the past couple I made, apologies for that, but many of the others I made recently do have the short description and I've just added the wikitext for the short description into the general template I usually use for creating new pages so I don't forget it again). I have not made the error of punctuating et in "et al." in a while either.
::Also, I have been told elsewhere that a Wikipedia page's introduction should not have citations in it and that references should only be in the main body of the text. Given that I usually just put the information about the time period and region the animal lived in and what its classification is, which are already given in the taxobox and the brief "Distribution" section where I state the site/geologic layer the animal is from, would the information in the introduction not already be covered by those parts of the page? Anteosaurus magnificus (talk) 17:57, 22 October 2025 (UTC)
:::I apologize for making some unfair accusations, and I appreciate your efforts to address the previous ones. Still, ''Afrolagus ↗'' uses "leporid ↗" without mention of rabbits/hares, and "Distribution" is still being widely implemented, despite the aforementioned meaninglessness of this term for extinct species known from a single specimen or locality. Distribution sections should almost always be reserved for extant taxa for which this data is available.<br/>Regarding citations in the lead section (opening paragraph), please refer to MOS:LEADCITE ↗. There is nothing wrong with citations in the lead, especially in short articles. When the lead is only a summary of the rest of a larger page's content, it doesn't need citations since the content is cited in the main body. But in instances of short pages like yours where the lead contains content not mentioned or cited elsewhere, it certainly needs a citation. Hope this helps. -SlvrHwk (talk) 20:39, 25 October 2025 (UTC)

Half-assed editing



I am consistently annoyed by your half-assed edits to prehistoric animal articles. When you added a list of countries that ''P. gombaszogensis'' supposedly lived in, you obviously did not bother to do an even cursory literature review, and left most of the countries out. When I tried to correct this, I got edit conflicted by you adding a single country, it was present in (missing over half a dozen others), which meant I lost the correction. Can I ask you to leave the article alone, so that someone actually competent at writing encyclpedia articles (i.e. me) can fix it? Thanks. Hemiauchenia (talk) 22:36, 6 September 2025 (UTC)
: Please also read MOS:OVERLINK ↗. Adding links wikipedia links to basic, commons words like "known" like you did here ↗ is completely against the manual of style. Hemiauchenia (talk) 19:22, 5 October 2025 (UTC)

CS1 error on Middle Miocene Climatic Optimum ↗


25px|alt=|link= ↗ Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have '''automatically detected''' that this edit ↗ performed by you, on the page :Middle Miocene Climatic Optimum ↗, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive ↗, you can [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:Qwerfjkl/Botpreload&editintro=User:Qwerfjkl/boteditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:Qwerfjkl&preloadtitle=Qwerfjkl%20(bot)%20–%20Anteosaurus_magnificus&section=new&preloadparams%5b%5d={{FULLPAGENAMEE:Middle Miocene Climatic Optimum}}&preloadparams%5b%5d=1312640091 report it to my operator].
Thanks, <!-- User:Qwerfjkl (bot)/inform -->Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 20:48, 21 September 2025 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 24



An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Galesaurus ↗, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Crista lacrimalis ↗.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:54, 24 October 2025 (UTC)

ArbCom 2025 Elections voter message



<div class="ivmbox " style="margin-bottom: 1em; border: 1px solid #a2a9b1; background-color: #fdf2d5; padding: 0.5em; display: flex; align-items: center; ">
<div class="ivmbox-image" style="padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em;flex-basis: 40px">40px ↗</div>
<div class="ivmbox-text">
Hello! Voting in the '''2025 Arbitration Committee elections ↗''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2025|end}}-1 day}}. All '''eligible users ↗''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee ↗ is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process ↗. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans ↗, topic bans ↗, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy ↗ describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please review the candidates ↗ and submit your choices on the '''2025|poll}}|voting page ↗'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. <small>MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:55, 18 November 2025 (UTC)</small>

</div>
</div>
<!-- Message sent by User:Cyberpower678@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2025/Coordination/MM/07&oldid=1322758895 -->

Nomination of :Porphyrio claytongreenei ↗ for deletion


<div class="afd-notice">
<div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0;">48px|alt=|link= ↗</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article :Porphyrio claytongreenei ↗ is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines ↗ or whether it should be deleted ↗.

The article will be discussed at '''Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Porphyrio claytongreenei ↗''' until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.<!-- Template:Afd notice --></div> Traumnovelle (talk) 19:36, 7 February 2026 (UTC)

CS1 error on Ernst Mayr ↗


25px|alt=|link= ↗ Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have '''automatically detected''' that this edit ↗ performed by you, on the page :Ernst Mayr ↗, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive ↗, you can [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:Qwerfjkl/Botpreload&editintro=User:Qwerfjkl/Boteditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:Qwerfjkl&preloadtitle=Qwerfjkl%20(bot)%20–%20Anteosaurus_magnificus&section=new&preloadparams%5b%5d={{FULLPAGENAMEE:Ernst Mayr}}&preloadparams%5b%5d=1338928247 report it to my operator].
Thanks, <!-- User:Qwerfjkl (bot)/inform -->Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 01:42, 18 February 2026 (UTC)

March 2026



30px|link=|alt=Copyright problem icon ↗ Your edit to :Prolimnocyon ↗ has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted ↗ material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission ↗ from the copyright holder. If you {{em|are}} the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials ↗ for information on how to contribute your work appropriately. For legal reasons, Wikipedia strictly cannot host copyrighted text or images from print media or digital platforms without an appropriate ↗ and verifiable license. Contributions infringing on copyright will be removed. You may use external websites or publications as a source of {{em|information}}, but not as a source of {{em|content}}, such as sentences or images&mdash;you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy '''will be blocked from editing ↗'''. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources ↗ for more information. <!-- Template:uw-copyright --> — Diannaa&nbsp;<span style="color:red">🍁</span>&nbsp;(talk) 14:56, 7 March 2026 (UTC)

CS1 error on Fossorial ↗


25px|alt=|link= ↗ Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have '''automatically detected''' that this edit ↗ performed by you, on the page :Fossorial ↗, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive ↗, you can [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:Qwerfjkl/Botpreload&editintro=User:Qwerfjkl/Boteditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:Qwerfjkl&preloadtitle=Qwerfjkl%20(bot)%20–%20Anteosaurus_magnificus&section=new&preloadparams%5b%5d={{FULLPAGENAMEE:Fossorial}}&preloadparams%5b%5d=1342248244 report it to my operator].
Thanks, <!-- User:Qwerfjkl (bot)/inform -->Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 23:00, 7 March 2026 (UTC)

CS1 error on Rodolphe Tabuce ↗


25px|alt=|link= ↗ Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have '''automatically detected''' that this edit ↗ performed by you, on the page :Rodolphe Tabuce ↗, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive ↗, you can [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:Qwerfjkl/Botpreload&editintro=User:Qwerfjkl/Boteditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:Qwerfjkl&preloadtitle=Qwerfjkl%20(bot)%20–%20Anteosaurus_magnificus&section=new&preloadparams%5b%5d={{FULLPAGENAMEE:Rodolphe Tabuce}}&preloadparams%5b%5d=1346119855 report it to my operator].
Thanks, <!-- User:Qwerfjkl (bot)/inform -->Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 01:55, 30 March 2026 (UTC)

April 2026



25px|alt=Information icon ↗ In your flurry of recent page creations, two of them (''Nyctodon ↗'', ''Nacholameryx ↗'') lack a properly-formatted speciesbox as the parent taxon itself is missing a taxonomy template. Also, please be conscientious of MOS:LINK ↗ (MOS:SOB ↗, MOS:OL ↗, etc.). I feel this should go without saying, but please put more care and attention into the pages you create. A poorly-constructed three-sentence stub page has little value to a reader who actually wants to learn something about the taxon in question, and, given your edit history, I know you are clearly capable of more helpful contributions. -SlvrHwk (talk) 04:52, 3 April 2026 (UTC)

:Hi SlvrHwk,
:The taxobox for some pages appears broken even after I create the taxobox for the higher level taxonomic category that did not have it previously. For example, in my ''Dynamognathus ↗'' page, I created the taxobox for ''Dynamognathus'' and also for the tribe Desmognathini, and after I made the taxobox for the tribe Desmognathini, the taxobox appeared clean and unbroken in the preview before I saved the taxobox for Desmognathini, as the peview showed there was already a taxobox for the next highest taxon, that being Plethodontinae. But when I visit the page of ''Dynamognathus'', it still appears broken. Does it just take a while for these taxoboxes to update? Anteosaurus magnificus (talk) 19:03, 4 April 2026 (UTC)
::If you save an edit to an article within a couple of seconds of creating a taxonomy template for it, the template may not be recognized. But that definitely shouldn't take even as long as 10 seconds after creating the template. However, if that does happen, the taxobox in the article may be broken for hours; you can fix it by making a null edit a few seconds later. Plantdrew (talk) 20:13, 4 April 2026 (UTC)

Ways to improve Otaria josefinae



Hello, Anteosaurus magnificus,

Thank you for creating Otaria josefinae ↗.

I have tagged the page ↗ as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process ↗ and note that:

{{Quote|1=The source you have appears to be the first description of the species and so a primary rather than secondary source. We would usually need multiple reliable secondary sources to justify a new article.}}

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with <code><nowiki>{{Re|</nowiki>Boynamedsue<nowiki>}}</nowiki></code>. Remember to sign your reply with <code><nowiki>~~~~</nowiki></code>. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse ↗.

<small>Delivered via the Page Curation ↗ tool, on behalf of the reviewer.</small> <!-- Template:Taggednote-NPF -->

Boynamedsue (talk) 18:30, 18 April 2026 (UTC)

Otaria josefinae ↗ moved to draftspace



Thanks for your contributions to Otaria josefinae ↗. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing as a live article at this time because '''it has no sources'''.
I have converted it to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page ↗.
When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Boynamedsue (talk) 18:31, 18 April 2026 (UTC)

CS1 error on Camurodon ↗


25px|alt=|link= ↗ Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have '''automatically detected''' that this edit ↗ performed by you, on the page :Camurodon ↗, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive ↗, you can [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:Qwerfjkl/Botpreload&editintro=User:Qwerfjkl/Boteditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:Qwerfjkl&preloadtitle=Qwerfjkl%20(bot)%20–%20Anteosaurus_magnificus&section=new&preloadparams%5b%5d={{FULLPAGENAMEE:Camurodon}}&preloadparams%5b%5d=1359038383 report it to my operator].
Thanks, <!-- User:Qwerfjkl (bot)/inform -->Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 17:44, 12 June 2026 (UTC)